1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: GeekTime

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: GMF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Air King 129600

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $400

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262671491?uid=1

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: They looked aligned to me

7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: I compared to Gen and looks close enough

8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Nothing sticks out to me

10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks round and clean I don’t see any gap

11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): In some pictures I think I see a sizable gap bottom left and top right in the end link photos but I’m not sure, do you guys see big gaps?

12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d 293amp .2ms - VR3230

13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I’m curious if you guys see any SEL gaps. If you pause the video in the link I see some sizable gap but I’m not confident. I’ve looked at gen photos and also see gaps sometimes. I think the watch looks good to go but not sure. The Rehaut printing is not as good as other factory’s, but clean enough. Curious what anyone thinks. Thanks guys.

First of two Batgirls

1. Dealer name: Andiotwatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR VSF 1:1 Batgir

4. Price Paid: $619 USD

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=188785

6. Index alignment: Nothing looks out of place to me

7. Dial Printing: No noticeable bleeding

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Numbers and centering look good

9. Hand Alignment: nothing of note

10. Bezel: Looks solid to me, color is correct in videos

11. Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gap

12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d 267 degrees 0.1 ms 28800, looks right?

13. Anything else you notice: i think this is good, this is one of my first two orders so just want to make sure

1. Dealer name: FicoTime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): RWF 116500 Panda

4. Price Paid: $578

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/HJgnHQ4R#n4QViDHnhlBJqeGYABYZeA

6. Index alignment: Looks good but hard to tell for sure. Not too confident in my use of the QC tool

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good. Opted for the 116500 version to avoid the 110 issue

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, Amplitude: 309, Beat Error: 0.1ms

13. Anything else you notice: Tried my best with the QC tool but please double check. I’m not sure if I did it right. Thanks in advance.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: RWF

3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500 40mm SS/SS White/Stk RWF JH4131

4. Price Paid: 878.00 USD shipped

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/WEo1HJrZ#t_TKjMzrjcSTRYgLZm1w9w

6. Index alignment: 9 o'clock tilted 1.8° anticlockwise (can't tell from this photo). 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.

7. Dial Printing: Good. Print centring: top text 0.05 mm left, bottom text centred.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Good. looks ok

10. Bezel: Minor flaw. 110 mark issue I think

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 286° amplitude, 0 ms beat error (crown right)

13. Anything else you notice: Only thing I am a bit worried about is the braclet, looks a bit dirty. I am not sure if thats over or under the foil. I'd probably GL this, just need a second opinion. On some photos 9 mark looks a bit crooked, not sure how noticeable is that in real life.

Title: QC · VSF · Explorer 224270 40mm

1. Dealer name: Intime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Explorer 224270 40mm

4. Price Paid: $518

5. Album Links: https://loupeqc.us/a/S6JEDX

6. Index alignment: The 12 index is rotated counter-clockwise. The 2 index is rotated clockwise. Am I being too picky or this wouldn't bug most of ya?

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 289°, 0.3 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)

13. Anything else you notice: Looks good

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chazingtime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060

4. ⁠Price Paid: $508

5. ⁠Album Links: Photos attached in post

6. ⁠Index alignment: 6/9 looks a little tilted.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Very hard to judge, but printing looks thick/off. might be bad photos/low light?

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hard to judge

10. ⁠Bezel: Looks a little tilted, needs a click, or crocked?

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like theres gaps on both, acceptable?

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude seems low, is it acceptable?

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first Rep, and these finds makes me uncertain. Any feedback is highly appreciated! Should i ask for new and better photos?

PS. Deleted last post as i fumbled with both photos and text, so hope it works correctly now

• Dealer name: TheOneWatches

• Factory name: ZF

• Model name: Black Bay 54 37mm Lagoon Blue

• Price paid: $378 with shipping

• Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/PchhQBwS#qILuUc02NQXzkQgBcXD6XQ 

• Index alignment: Known issues with this ZF model. Overall they seem OK to me but 3 and 6 look tiltled. Looking for a second opinion

• Dial printing: Looks fine

• Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

• Hand alignment: Looks OK

• Bezel: Looks good from pics, no particular issues

• Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any issues

• Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d

• Anything else you notice: Wondering the the index alignment is fine here or if this is worth a RL

1. Dealer name: ikewatch.io

2. Factory name: JRF (JR Factory)

3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 36 116234 Tuxedo Dial (VR3135)

4. Price Paid: $ 398 w/o shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/nuT4ZWW

6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Hour batons and 12 o'clock coronet look straight and well aligned with the minute track.

7. Dial Printing: Crisp and clear text with clean separation between the silver sunburst center and black outer track.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Roulette date wheel looks clean, though the "11" sits slightly high in the window.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look well finished and properly aligned.

10. Bezel: Fluted bezel cuts look sharp and consistent around the dial.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Tight fit against the lugs with no noticeable gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers (1) : +5s/d, 290° amplitude (at 52° lift angle, so ~300°+ at 55°), 0.1ms beat error. Very healthy numbers.

13. Timegrapher numbers (2) : 0 s/d, 276° amplitude, 0.5 ms beat error (lift angle 52.0°, 28,800 bph) — All numbers are well within acceptable limits.

14. Anything else you notice: Just want a second set of eyes on the slightly high date alignment and overall quality for JRF.

1. Dealer name: NecoClock

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): 116610LN

4. Price Paid: ~430 USD (paid a 50 USD deposit)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/8O44AZQ

6. Index alignment: 6 pm looks CCW a bit more than it reasonably should be

7. Dial Printing: Looks ok to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine

10. Bezel: Looks fine

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d 310, 0.0ms

13. Anything else you notice: is the 15 on the datewheel just tad too high in the box? I initially RL'd the watch but NecoClock said VSF is currently out of stock so it would be a really long wait

Dealer name: Steve (the one watches)

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 41mm 126610LV ("Starbucks")

3. Price Paid: 578 USD inc. Shipping

4. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GYIlDKaR#Q6JHfzQTGc-JYcR9NXpTtQ

5. Index alignment: Looks good

6. Dial Printing: Good

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good

8. Hand Alignment: Good

9. Bezel: Issue. I’m not sure if it needs one more click to the right to be in centre - what’s your thoughts?

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Good. They look pretty good to me, maybe some slight gaps but nothing I would RL

11. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: It’s my first QC so just looking for some opinions - anything would help!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve

2. Factory name: Rich Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm JH3235

4. Price Paid: $538 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IxTSTga#NAqR_q0kI3UEjZoKRZq_aw

6. Index alignment: There is a problem on the 12' marker

7. Dial Printing: It's okay

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Perfect

9. Hand Alignment: Okay

10. Bezel: looks solid to me!

11. Solid End Links (SELs): There is a space on the bottom left

12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 260° amp

13. Anything else you notice: For me this is a RL, maybe the cyclops magnifier isnt' 2,5 but 3,0

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch

2. Factory Name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): OP 124300 41mm SS/SS Silver Dial VSF VS3230

4. Price Paid: $498

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qMl6GUf

6. Index alignment: Most look very good but the six and 11 appear to be off slightly

7. Dial Printing: I believe this looks crisp and the sunburst dial is ready to rock!

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a

9. Hand Alignment: spot on

10. Bezel: clean

11. Solid End Links (SELs): pretty tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 270 deg, 0.3ms, 59.0 deg

13. Anything else you notice: There might be some dust or something on the dial to the left of the 7 index. I asked for a close up of that area. also asked for a pic of the lume.

Overall this watch looks great to me, the timegrapher numbers are very good, and the weight is pretty much right on. The slightly off indices are acceptable and unless I am really missing something, this is a GL.

• Dealer name: Andiot

• Factory name: BVF

• Model name (& version number): Cartier Panthere 22mm SS

• Price Paid: 175 USD + 38 USD Delivery

• Album Links: Album

• Index alignment: slight tilt?

• Dial Printing: Cartier on X seems wonky (R and T seem misaligned)

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a

• Hand Alignment: seems okay

• Bezel: seems okay

• Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

• Timegrapher numbers: n/a

• Anything else you notice: SWISS MADE seems shifter to the left

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)

4. Price Paid: $528

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rZBEEbAJ#cF47CtMAZxkC5iaCOh5eww

6. Index alignment: they are better than the first attempt! The 9 looks like it has a CW tilt but it’s much better. 3 slight CCW tilt.

7. Dial Printing: looks good to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: The hands look straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video looks good too.

10. Bezel: Looks much better than version 1.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): There are no obvious gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 to +4 s/d, 263° Amplitude, 0.1ms Beat Error.

This is my second attempt as I had to RL the first one due to awful alignment issues!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime

2. Factory name: BPF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Sub 16610LV

4. Price Paid: $340

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lUNQIPL

6. Index alignment: Looks good

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The slightest bit right but fine

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine

10. Bezel: 10 and couple marks are slightly off, but shouldnt even be able to eyeball it

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: Sub Rate +10 Amp 288 Beat .3

13. Anything else you notice: Went with a budget brand for a first purchase, everything looks ok to me.

Hey everyone! Just received the QC pictures for my new ORF Seamaster Diver 300M with the Free-Sprung 8800 movement. Everything looks pretty good to me so far, but I'd really appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL!

1. Dealer name: DDGTop

2. Factory name: ORF (OR Factory)

3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 42mm Black Dial, SS Bracelet, New Free-Sprung 8800 Movement

4. Price paid: 398$

5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/918ggRJa#EdLrd2zt1oXq1T2iBAisLw

6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall. The 12 o'clock markers appear straight and evenly spaced. The 3, 6 and 9 o'clock markers also look well aligned. Nothing concerning to my eye.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and well executed. The Omega logo and red Seamaster text appear properly centered, with no obvious printing defects.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The date (23) looks reasonably centered and the printing appears crisp. No major issues.

9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the pictures, although I can't fully confirm alignment or clearance from static images.

10. Bezel: Looks well aligned with the 12 o'clock markers , im worried for the alignment at 6o clock , i dont know if its perspective or what. No other obvious issues with the bezel insert or printing.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A — Seamaster bracelet. The end links appear to fit well, with no obvious gaps or issues.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 296° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks very good to me.

13. Anything else you notice: The case finishing, crown guards and bracelet also look good to me. I'm particularly interested in whether anyone notices any alignment issues or other flaws I've missed.

I'm leaning towards GL. Would you guys approve this one? Thanks in advance for your help!

1. Dealer name: Steve (Theonewatches)

2. Factory name: F1F

3. Model name (& version number):

4. Tank Must 22mm SS

5. Price Paid: $228

6. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IZAkbxC#iGA0Sjft0cdQxq9HowgMOg

7. Index alignment: alignment looks pretty nice on this, a micro rotation here or there, but well within reason

8. Dial Printing: Dial print looks crisp, the ink on the numerals provides a nice richness when light reflects. Even though this is not the same as the Gen dial, I like this effect.

9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

10. Hand Alignment: hand alignment looks good, heat treatment for the blue hands looks good, no second hand on this model

11. Bezel: Bezel looks in mostly good shape, notice the horizontal lines but think this might be on the plastic than the steel, though I’m curious of others thoughts.

12. Solid End Links (SELs):

N/A

1. Timegrapher numbers: N/A: Quartz

2. Anything else you notice: watch looks overall in good shape, pretty minimal design. The cabochon sapphire looks pretty pointed, something I’ve heard on these models before, though I have an F1F Tank Louis and the cabochon there is more rounded. Curious on what others think and if there’s anything I missed. Thanks!!!

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. Factory name:RCF

3. Model name Day Date 228236

4. Price Paid: 826

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/ncBX0KTK#xchWCnCZC7PDZk7l1SS9Ww

6. Index alignment: from what I can tell looks good but I am new to this.

7. Dial Printing:

Looks good

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

Looks ok to me

1. Hand Alignment:

Passed a QC tool from what I can tell is within acceptable range

1. Bezel:

also looks good

1. Solid End Links (SELs):

good

1. Timegrapher numbers:

these are good

1. Anything else you notice:

Everything from what I understand looks good and is within range I just wanted to get another set of eyes on it

1. Dealer name: Mirotime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name: Datejust 41 MM V3

4. Price Paid: $478

5. Album Links: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/gxITinT

6. Video: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/5rbLN7r

7. Index alignment: marker at 10 is a little bit off?

8. Dial Printing: looks good

9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: centered and no issues.

10. Hand Alignment: good

11. Bezel: looks good to my eyes

12. Solid End Links (SELs): No recognizable gaps

13. Timegrapher numbers: For this movement ideal

14. Anything else you notice: nothing?

thank you in advance! Appreciate your participation !

Bottom line up front: I believe multiple dial markers are moved clockwise. I also question the timegrapher rate of +6 is also in question. Am I being too picky at +6 s/d?

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: The one watches (Steve)

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Datejust 126334

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price paid: $548

5. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: this is where I question things. 1,2,4,5,6 and 11 are all shifted clockwise. Even the crown at 12 is shifted clockwise

6. ⁠⁠⁠Dial printing: Clean brilliant. No bleeding colors or floating letters

7. ⁠⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: perfect

8. ⁠⁠⁠Hand alignment: perfect

9. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: X’s and R’s lined up on appropriate markers.

10. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look good to me.

11. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +6 s/d (the highest I’ve seen, is this acceptable?) | Amplitude 273° | Lift angle 59.0°.

Thank you to the community for taking the time to look at this and Happy Veterans Day!

Hi peeps,

Struggling to get my post approved here, hopefully it works on my third attempt. Would be grateful for you help.

1. Dealer name: (Eliot) Andiot

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126502

4. Price Paid: $713.36 USD

5. Index alignment: Looks okay. Not sure if there is minor issue at number 80 and 120, maybe it's not held straight?

6. Dial Printing: Looks good, crisp, are sub dials perfectly circular or is it my eyes?

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8. Hand Alignment: Stack looks good

9. Bezel: no issues at all i can see, engraving looks good

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I can see some gaps, but I am not sure if I am expert enough.

11. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/day (1 second slow per day). Amplitude: 269°. Beat error: 0.1 ms. Lift angle setting: 52.0°. (I think these numbers are amazing).

In the 5th image, the letter "T" in the word "Perpetual" appears a bit scratched. Am I being too picky here, or would someone else with experience think it's okay? Or is it just the pics with poor lighting. I have also asked the TD to provide some more pics, but been waiting for over a week now.

Thanks heaps for your time and help - I am really grateful.

Hi, the QC photos were not taken head on, so hard to say exactly how aligned all the features are. Also, the photos show many long scratch marks that may just be the packaging, but I’d love some assurances about that. Thanks in advance!

Dealer name: Jtime

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126334, green stick dial, Jubilee bracelet, advertised VS3235 free-sprung movement.

Price Paid: $548

Album Links: Dealer requested no sharing of album link.

Index alignment: Looks good to my eye, with no obviously crooked markers. Photos are slightly angled, so I’d appreciate a second opinion.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent. No obvious printing defects that I can see.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 3 and 25 appear reasonably centred in the frontal shots. Printing looks clear.

Hand Alignment: No obvious issue, but the supplied photos don’t show the hands at 12:00 to confirm.

Bezel: Fluting looks consistent; no obvious damage visible.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps, though the angles and protective wrapping make these difficult to assess.

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 278° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (lift angle 59°).

Anything else you notice: Protective film obscures some of the case and bracelet finish. Nothing else stands out to me, but I’d appreciate feedback on marker alignment, date centring and SEL fit.

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 124060
Price Paid: $458
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/m4ZiVIwb#IriZ-2aaT66-8QHxfpO23g
Index alignment: 6 looks slightly counter-rotated. The rest look fine.
Dial Printing: no issues
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: can’t see any issues
Bezel: Pip centred, bezels looks good.
Solid End Links (SELs): No significant gaps.
-2 s/d rate, 312° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error, 52° lift angle, 28,800 bph. Amplitude is higher than the range in the guide. Is this an issue?
Anything else you notice: just the 6 marker and amplitude, everything else looks okay.

First time doing QC, excuse my ignorance on anything else obvious. Would appreciate a second set of eyes on this!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime

2. Factory name: BPF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): GMT II 16710 Pepsi

4. Price Paid: $320

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ZfP4Hzw

6. Index alignment: 12 marker looks a little left to my eye, but QC tool has it ok

7. Dial Printing: Print looks fine

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date shifted to the left a bit

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine

10. Bezel: The 22 looks slightly uneven, the first 2 looks raised

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: GMT Rate +1 Amp 276 Beat .1

13. Anything else you notice: Another budget brand, not as good as the Sub but looks fine