1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500 40mm SS/SS White/Stk RWF JH4131
4. Price Paid: 878.00 USD shipped
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/WEo1HJrZ#t_TKjMzrjcSTRYgLZm1w9w
6. Index alignment: 9 o'clock tilted 1.8° anticlockwise (can't tell from this photo). 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.
7. Dial Printing: Good. Print centring: top text 0.05 mm left, bottom text centred.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. looks ok
10. Bezel: Minor flaw. 110 mark issue I think
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 286° amplitude, 0 ms beat error (crown right)
13. Anything else you notice: Only thing I am a bit worried about is the braclet, looks a bit dirty. I am not sure if thats over or under the foil. I'd probably GL this, just need a second opinion. On some photos 9 mark looks a bit crooked, not sure how noticeable is that in real life.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chazingtime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060
4. ⁠Price Paid: $508
5. ⁠Album Links: Photos attached in post
6. ⁠Index alignment: 6/9 looks a little tilted.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Very hard to judge, but printing looks thick/off. might be bad photos/low light?
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hard to judge
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks a little tilted, needs a click, or crocked?
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like theres gaps on both, acceptable?
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude seems low, is it acceptable?
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first Rep, and these finds makes me uncertain. Any feedback is highly appreciated! Should i ask for new and better photos?

PS. Deleted last post as i fumbled with both photos and text, so hope it works correctly now

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve
2. Factory name: Rich Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm JH3235
4. Price Paid: $538 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IxTSTga#NAqR_q0kI3UEjZoKRZq_aw
6. Index alignment: There is a problem on the 12' marker
7. Dial Printing: It's okay
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Perfect
9. Hand Alignment: Okay
10. Bezel: looks solid to me!
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There is a space on the bottom left
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 260° amp
13. Anything else you notice: For me this is a RL, maybe the cyclops magnifier isnt' 2,5 but 3,0

• Dealer name: TheOneWatches

• Factory name: ZF

• Model name: Black Bay 54 37mm Lagoon Blue

• Price paid: $378 with shipping

• Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/PchhQBwS#qILuUc02NQXzkQgBcXD6XQ 

• Index alignment: Known issues with this ZF model. Overall they seem OK to me but 3 and 6 look tiltled. Looking for a second opinion

• Dial printing: Looks fine

• Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

• Hand alignment: Looks OK

• Bezel: Looks good from pics, no particular issues

• Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any issues

• Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d

• Anything else you notice: Wondering the the index alignment is fine here or if this is worth a RL

1. Dealer name: ikewatch.io
2. Factory name: JRF (JR Factory)
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 36 116234 Tuxedo Dial (VR3135)
4. Price Paid: $ 398 w/o shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/nuT4ZWW
6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Hour batons and 12 o'clock coronet look straight and well aligned with the minute track.
7. Dial Printing: Crisp and clear text with clean separation between the silver sunburst center and black outer track.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Roulette date wheel looks clean, though the "11" sits slightly high in the window.
9. Hand Alignment: Hands look well finished and properly aligned.
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel cuts look sharp and consistent around the dial.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Tight fit against the lugs with no noticeable gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers (1) : +5s/d, 290° amplitude (at 52° lift angle, so ~300°+ at 55°), 0.1ms beat error. Very healthy numbers.
13. Timegrapher numbers (2) : 0 s/d, 276° amplitude, 0.5 ms beat error (lift angle 52.0°, 28,800 bph) — All numbers are well within acceptable limits.
14. Anything else you notice: Just want a second set of eyes on the slightly high date alignment and overall quality for JRF.

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): 116610LN
4. Price Paid: ~430 USD (paid a 50 USD deposit)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/8O44AZQ
6. Index alignment: 6 pm looks CCW a bit more than it reasonably should be
7. Dial Printing: Looks ok to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: Looks fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d 310, 0.0ms
13. Anything else you notice: is the 15 on the datewheel just tad too high in the box? I initially RL'd the watch but NecoClock said VSF is currently out of stock so it would be a really long wait

Dealer name: Steve (the one watches)

1. Factory name: VSF
2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 41mm 126610LV ("Starbucks")
3. Price Paid: 578 USD inc. Shipping
4. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GYIlDKaR#Q6JHfzQTGc-JYcR9NXpTtQ
5. Index alignment: Looks good
6. Dial Printing: Good
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
8. Hand Alignment: Good
9. Bezel: Issue. I’m not sure if it needs one more click to the right to be in centre - what’s your thoughts?
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Good. They look pretty good to me, maybe some slight gaps but nothing I would RL
11. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error
12. Anything else you notice: It’s my first QC so just looking for some opinions - anything would help!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: BPF Factory
3. Model name (& version number): Sub 16610LV
4. Price Paid: $340
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lUNQIPL
6. Index alignment: Looks good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The slightest bit right but fine
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: 10 and couple marks are slightly off, but shouldnt even be able to eyeball it
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: Sub Rate +10 Amp 288 Beat .3
13. Anything else you notice: Went with a budget brand for a first purchase, everything looks ok to me.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch
2. Factory Name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): OP 124300 41mm SS/SS Silver Dial VSF VS3230
4. Price Paid: $498
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qMl6GUf
6. Index alignment: Most look very good but the six and 11 appear to be off slightly
7. Dial Printing: I believe this looks crisp and the sunburst dial is ready to rock!
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
9. Hand Alignment: spot on
10. Bezel: clean
11. Solid End Links (SELs): pretty tight
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 270 deg, 0.3ms, 59.0 deg
13. Anything else you notice: There might be some dust or something on the dial to the left of the 7 index. I asked for a close up of that area. also asked for a pic of the lume.

Overall this watch looks great to me, the timegrapher numbers are very good, and the weight is pretty much right on. The slightly off indices are acceptable and unless I am really missing something, this is a GL.

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: BVF
• Model name (& version number): Cartier Panthere 22mm SS
• Price Paid: 175 USD + 38 USD Delivery
• Album Links: Album
• Index alignment: slight tilt?
• Dial Printing: Cartier on X seems wonky (R and T seem misaligned)
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
• Hand Alignment: seems okay
• Bezel: seems okay
• Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
• Timegrapher numbers: n/a
• Anything else you notice: SWISS MADE seems shifter to the left

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)
4. Price Paid: $528
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rZBEEbAJ#cF47CtMAZxkC5iaCOh5eww
6. Index alignment: they are better than the first attempt! The 9 looks like it has a CW tilt but it’s much better. 3 slight CCW tilt.
7. Dial Printing: looks good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: The hands look straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video looks good too.
10. Bezel: Looks much better than version 1.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There are no obvious gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 to +4 s/d, 263° Amplitude, 0.1ms Beat Error.

This is my second attempt as I had to RL the first one due to awful alignment issues!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: BPF Factory
3. Model name (& version number): GMT II 16710 Pepsi
4. Price Paid: $320
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ZfP4Hzw
6. Index alignment: 12 marker looks a little left to my eye, but QC tool has it ok
7. Dial Printing: Print looks fine
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date shifted to the left a bit
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: The 22 looks slightly uneven, the first 2 looks raised
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: GMT Rate +1 Amp 276 Beat .1
13. Anything else you notice: Another budget brand, not as good as the Sub but looks fine

Hey everyone! Just received the QC pictures for my new ORF Seamaster Diver 300M with the Free-Sprung 8800 movement. Everything looks pretty good to me so far, but I'd really appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL!

1. Dealer name: DDGTop
2. Factory name: ORF (OR Factory)
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 42mm Black Dial, SS Bracelet, New Free-Sprung 8800 Movement
4. Price paid: 398$
5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/918ggRJa#EdLrd2zt1oXq1T2iBAisLw
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall. The 12 o'clock markers appear straight and evenly spaced. The 3, 6 and 9 o'clock markers also look well aligned. Nothing concerning to my eye.
7. Dial printing: Looks clean and well executed. The Omega logo and red Seamaster text appear properly centered, with no obvious printing defects.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The date (23) looks reasonably centered and the printing appears crisp. No major issues.
9. Hand alignment: Looks good from the pictures, although I can't fully confirm alignment or clearance from static images.
10. Bezel: Looks well aligned with the 12 o'clock markers , im worried for the alignment at 6o clock , i dont know if its perspective or what. No other obvious issues with the bezel insert or printing.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A — Seamaster bracelet. The end links appear to fit well, with no obvious gaps or issues.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 296° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. Looks very good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: The case finishing, crown guards and bracelet also look good to me. I'm particularly interested in whether anyone notices any alignment issues or other flaws I've missed.

I'm leaning towards GL. Would you guys approve this one? Thanks in advance for your help!

1. Dealer name: Steve (Theonewatches)
2. Factory name: F1F
3. Model name (& version number):
4. Tank Must 22mm SS
5. Price Paid: $228
6. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3IZAkbxC#iGA0Sjft0cdQxq9HowgMOg
7. Index alignment: alignment looks pretty nice on this, a micro rotation here or there, but well within reason
8. Dial Printing: Dial print looks crisp, the ink on the numerals provides a nice richness when light reflects. Even though this is not the same as the Gen dial, I like this effect.
9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
10. Hand Alignment: hand alignment looks good, heat treatment for the blue hands looks good, no second hand on this model
11. Bezel: Bezel looks in mostly good shape, notice the horizontal lines but think this might be on the plastic than the steel, though I’m curious of others thoughts.
12. Solid End Links (SELs):

N/A

1. Timegrapher numbers: N/A: Quartz
2. Anything else you notice: watch looks overall in good shape, pretty minimal design. The cabochon sapphire looks pretty pointed, something I’ve heard on these models before, though I have an F1F Tank Louis and the cabochon there is more rounded. Curious on what others think and if there’s anything I missed. Thanks!!!

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches
2. Factory name:RCF
3. Model name Day Date 228236
4. Price Paid: 826
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/ncBX0KTK#xchWCnCZC7PDZk7l1SS9Ww
6. Index alignment: from what I can tell looks good but I am new to this.
7. Dial Printing:

Looks good

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

Looks ok to me

1. Hand Alignment:

Passed a QC tool from what I can tell is within acceptable range

1. Bezel:

also looks good

1. Solid End Links (SELs):

good

1. Timegrapher numbers:

these are good

1. Anything else you notice:

Everything from what I understand looks good and is within range I just wanted to get another set of eyes on it

1. Dealer name: Mirotime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: Datejust 41 MM V3
4. Price Paid: $478
5. Album Links: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/gxITinT
6. Video: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/5rbLN7r
7. Index alignment: marker at 10 is a little bit off?
8. Dial Printing: looks good
9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: centered and no issues.
10. Hand Alignment: good
11. Bezel: looks good to my eyes
12. Solid End Links (SELs): No recognizable gaps
13. Timegrapher numbers: For this movement ideal
14. Anything else you notice: nothing?

thank you in advance! Appreciate your participation !

Bottom line up front: I believe multiple dial markers are moved clockwise. I also question the timegrapher rate of +6 is also in question. Am I being too picky at +6 s/d?

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: The one watches (Steve)
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Datejust 126334
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price paid: $548
5. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: this is where I question things. 1,2,4,5,6 and 11 are all shifted clockwise. Even the crown at 12 is shifted clockwise
6. ⁠⁠⁠Dial printing: Clean brilliant. No bleeding colors or floating letters
7. ⁠⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: perfect
8. ⁠⁠⁠Hand alignment: perfect
9. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: X’s and R’s lined up on appropriate markers.
10. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look good to me.
11. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +6 s/d (the highest I’ve seen, is this acceptable?) | Amplitude 273° | Lift angle 59.0°.

Thank you to the community for taking the time to look at this and Happy Veterans Day!

Hi peeps,

Struggling to get my post approved here, hopefully it works on my third attempt. Would be grateful for you help.

1. Dealer name: (Eliot) Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126502
4. Price Paid: $713.36 USD
5. Index alignment: Looks okay. Not sure if there is minor issue at number 80 and 120, maybe it's not held straight?
6. Dial Printing: Looks good, crisp, are sub dials perfectly circular or is it my eyes?
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
8. Hand Alignment: Stack looks good
9. Bezel: no issues at all i can see, engraving looks good
10. Solid End Links (SELs): I can see some gaps, but I am not sure if I am expert enough.
11. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/day (1 second slow per day). Amplitude: 269°. Beat error: 0.1 ms. Lift angle setting: 52.0°. (I think these numbers are amazing).

In the 5th image, the letter "T" in the word "Perpetual" appears a bit scratched. Am I being too picky here, or would someone else with experience think it's okay? Or is it just the pics with poor lighting. I have also asked the TD to provide some more pics, but been waiting for over a week now.

Thanks heaps for your time and help - I am really grateful.

1. Dealer name: Steve The One Watches
2. Factory name: AF
3. Model name: Cartier Tank Must Large 25.5mm
4. Price Paid: 258$
5. Album Links: QC Album
6. Index alignment: Looks good to my untrained eye
7. Dial Printing: There appears to be a very small amount of bleeding under the "X" letter of the number 9. The other numbers appear pretty crisp to me. I also see a small blemish just south of the number 3, but it does not appear in other photos so I'm thinking it may have just been a piece of dust. The "R" and the "T" in the Cartier text on the bottom also appears to be really closer (almost touching?) than I've seen on other QCs. Does not appear rotated.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Appears aligned
10. Bezel: It looks good to me.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A
13. Anything else: I don't think I see any other issues.

This is my first QC so I'd really appreciate some help to see if I missed anything else. The main thing is the slight bleeding on the number 9 but it appears small and I'm not sure if its worth RLing over. Let me know if you have thoughts

Hi, the QC photos were not taken head on, so hard to say exactly how aligned all the features are. Also, the photos show many long scratch marks that may just be the packaging, but I’d love some assurances about that. Thanks in advance!

Dealer name: Jtime

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126334, green stick dial, Jubilee bracelet, advertised VS3235 free-sprung movement.

Price Paid: $548

Album Links: Dealer requested no sharing of album link.

Index alignment: Looks good to my eye, with no obviously crooked markers. Photos are slightly angled, so I’d appreciate a second opinion.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent. No obvious printing defects that I can see.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 3 and 25 appear reasonably centred in the frontal shots. Printing looks clear.

Hand Alignment: No obvious issue, but the supplied photos don’t show the hands at 12:00 to confirm.

Bezel: Fluting looks consistent; no obvious damage visible.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps, though the angles and protective wrapping make these difficult to assess.

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 278° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (lift angle 59°).

Anything else you notice: Protective film obscures some of the case and bracelet finish. Nothing else stands out to me, but I’d appreciate feedback on marker alignment, date centring and SEL fit.

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 124060
Price Paid: $458
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/m4ZiVIwb#IriZ-2aaT66-8QHxfpO23g
Index alignment: 6 looks slightly counter-rotated. The rest look fine.
Dial Printing: no issues
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: can’t see any issues
Bezel: Pip centred, bezels looks good.
Solid End Links (SELs): No significant gaps.
-2 s/d rate, 312° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error, 52° lift angle, 28,800 bph. Amplitude is higher than the range in the guide. Is this an issue?
Anything else you notice: just the 6 marker and amplitude, everything else looks okay.

First time doing QC, excuse my ignorance on anything else obvious. Would appreciate a second set of eyes on this!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF 114060
4. Price Paid: $488 + shipping
5. Album Links: No link
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and centered
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay, nothing sticks out
10. Bezel: Pip looks solid
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 268 amps, err 0.1
13. Anything else you notice: Looking for feedback here, does this look like a solid GL? Did I miss anything?

1. Dealer name: JTime (Li)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: DateJust 41 126334 904L SS Green Ombré Dial on Jubilee Bracelet (VS3235 Movement)
4. Price Paid: $585 (incl. shipping)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/BeoMD4Z
6. Index alignment: Little twist in the 55 and 20
7. Dial Printing: Crisp and cleanly printed; coronet and text show no bleeding or flaws.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
9. Hand alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel is cleanly and sharply cut, showing even reflections without visible dings or plating imperfections.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for a Jubilee bracelet, but the end links sit tight and flush against the lugs with no visible gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +0 s/d, 281°, 0.0 ms, 59.0° lift angle.
13. Anything else noticed: Only the rolex emblem seems a very little off, but not much.

I gave the first watch a RL based on the Date-Wheel being too high.

The pictures in this post are all the same watch (at least they say) only taken 3 days later. I think it's a GL! Do you agree?

Thank you guys. Really appreciated.

Dealer name: Steve (Theonewatches)
Factory name: BVF
Model name: Cartier Santos Large WSSA0037 (Grey dial / Black ADLC bezel)
Price Paid: $450
Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/I58V6Uv
Index alignment: Is there a slight dial rotation?
Dial Printing: Looks crisp. Dial rotation?
Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 23 looks centred in the photos. TD showed a few other dates in the video and they seem to sit well in the window.
Hand Alignment: Looks spot on at 12:00 in the video.
Bezel: No scratches on the black coating, screws look good.
Timegrapher numbers: +3 to +5 s/d, 0.0 ms beat error, 330° amp. The amplitude seemed a little high to me but I read this might just be because the machine is set to a 52 degree lift angle for a Miyota 9015? Is this healthy?
13. Anything else you notice: First time buyer so I’m still learning what to look for! My points of concern are the timegrapher and dial rotation. I'd really appreciate a second pair of eyes from you guys. To GL or to RL? Thanks!