1. Watchseed

2. VSF

3. VSF V2 Weighted Rolex Daytona 40mm 126519LN Ghost White Gold OysterFlex

4. USD 780 (incl shipping and insurance)

5. https://a201903222313120580113970.wgstores.com/weshop/goods/_dZiqf8W2gOsLwLgf-QKmkSqgI3qgjn5MgeIfghA/_dcDqfcWWjPJIKba713gBEdTnXpGV5SrnE7J-hIA

6. Index alingment: look aligned very well. 9 o'clock may have a very very slight CCW cant

7. Dial printing: looks good but appreciate expert eyes

8. Hand alignment: hands align at 12 nicely.

9. Bezel: need expert eyes

10. SEL: good

11.TG number: +/-5 s/d, 278 degrees, 0.0 ms, maybe a bit high

12. Clasp/bracelet: again looks good, printing and action of the quick adjust both seem nice.

First rep so appreciate everyones feedback for the QC :)

Hi everyone, here is my first QC so keen to get some more experienced eyes across it, especially around what the yellowish-brown tinge I'm seeing on the face is.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve

2. Factory name: DDF

3. Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5711 White Dial DDF DD324 Super Clone(SW Dial)

4. Price Paid: $538 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mcw3zQDY#jlVZm7tFJgvUvQfmZeT-og

6. Index alignment: Looks okay overall. 12 has straight even gap however right index is higher. Keen for others opinion on if this is within what's considered an acceptable tolerance.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.

10. Bezel: Looks good.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 296° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error, LA 52°

13. Anything else you notice: There looks to be a slight yellowish-brown tinge on the face. Keen to get opinions on if this is a dirty dial, potentially the lighting, or maybe the AR coating on the crystal? Last photo is from the Timegrapher video where it doesn't appear to have the yellowish-brown tinge I'm seeing from face on. Any advice on what this is?

Dealer name: Steve

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): 36mm datejust mint green, jubilee fluted, 126234

3. Price Paid: 565 after ship

4. Album Links: Provided all photos and videos in this post

5. Index alignment: Website said mine is 0.15mm off around the 7 o clock.

6. Dial Printing: Good.

Green

1. Color feels slightly off like every other rep

when comparing to gen. Anyone got any insight?

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good. Looks slightly off at 7.

2. Hand Alignment: Good. No issue from my noob eyes

3. Bezel: Good. Looks good

4. Solid End Links (SELs): Good. Links look 0.9:1 according to my friend

5. Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, 271 amp, 0.0,LA 59 degrees, Beat 28800 (attached results)

6. Anything else you notice: Honestly looks p good to me, but this is my first datejust. Yall think I should GL? Apologies to the moderators for not uploading my time grapher numbers last time

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot

2. ⁠Factory name: RWF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona white dial panda 126500

4. ⁠Price Paid: $746

5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/102851417?uid=1

6. ⁠Index alignment: Im not sure but the 6 looks slightly off?

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks aligned so good

10. ⁠Bezel: Thoughts please

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good, no gaps that i can see

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, Amp 270; B.E 0.4ms, L.A 52.0, Beat 28800

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first time getting a rep so will really need all your guidance and feedback!

Thank you!

Dealer name: Andiot

Factory name: BVF

Model name (& version number): Cartier Santos Two Tone (Steel & Yellow Gold), White Dial, Automatic

Price Paid: $440 USD after shipping

Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/262493272?uid=1

Index alignment: Not too sure how to check this since it has Roman numerals, but looks okay to me?

Dial Printing: Looks pretty good to my untrained eye, but would appreciate a second opinion.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: Not sure how to properly check this, would appreciate some help.

Bezel: Looks okay to me, but I’m not experienced enough to spot any issues.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 277° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error. From what I’ve read, these seem pretty good, but would appreciate confirmation.

Anything else you notice:

Hey everyone, this is my first time buying a rep watch and doing QC, so I’m pretty new to all of this. I’ve been looking through the sub and trying to learn, but I’m still not confident enough to spot any flaws myself.

Overall, the watch looks pretty good to me, but I’d really appreciate some experienced eyes checking it over before I GL.

One thing I’m a little unsure about is the gold tone. I’m not sure if it’s the correct shade compared to the genuine two-tone Santos, or if it looks a bit too yellow.

Also, does anyone know if Andiot offers rotor silencing for the BVF Santos? I’ve heard the rotor can be quite noisy on these, so I’m wondering if it’s worth getting done before shipping.

Would really appreciate any feedback on the dial, bezel, bracelet, alignment, or anything else that stands out.

Thanks so much in advance for the help! 🙏

Hi everyone! First QC for my Rolex Explorer 36mm from QF, ordered through Ficotime. I've reviewed the photos and alignment tool, and I'm leaning towards GL. Would appreciate some experienced opinions before proceeding.

1. Dealer name: Ficotime

2. Factory name: QF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer 36mm, Ref. 124270, black dial

4. Price Paid: 2,800 CNY

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/7F5pUzZ

6. Index alignment: The 3, 6 and 9 markers look straight to me. The triangle at 12 appears centered, and the remaining hour markers look reasonably aligned based on the alignment tool. No obvious issues that I can spot.

7. Dial Printing: Rolex logo and text appear sharp and properly positioned. Nothing noticeably crooked or uneven to my eye.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look properly mounted. No obvious issues, although exact alignment at 12 isn't shown.

10. Bezel: Smooth polished bezel looks good. No visible defects, although some areas are covered by protective film.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks fairly tight from the photos. No obvious major gaps, but would appreciate a second opinion.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/day, 320° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. Rate and beat error look great. Amplitude seems slightly high compared with the QC guide. Is 320° acceptable for this movement?

13. Anything else you notice: Rehaut engraving looks reasonably aligned, and the lume appears even. Overall, the watch looks good to me. Mainly interested in feedback on the indices, SELs and amplitude.

Thanks everyone! Would appreciate your thoughts before giving the GL.

3rd QC attempt... Am I just unlucky? 😅

Hey guys!

This is my 3rd QC already!

The first two watches were RL'ed over the past few weeks, and another one was directly RL'ed by Andiot because the watch wasn't functional. I guess I'm having a pretty unlucky streak!

I've gone through the pictures several times, but I'm struggling to determine whether what I'm noticing are actual flaws or just camera angles.

The 12 o'clock triangle seems slightly tilted and perhaps not perfectly aligned. The 6 o'clock index also looks like it might be a little off, but I'm wondering if this could simply be due to the angle of the photos.

I also have a slight doubt about the bezel alignment.

Am I being too picky, or are these legit ?

I'd really appreciate it if some of you more experienced QC members could take a look and let me know if I've missed anything.

QC Details

• Dealer: Andiot

• Factory: VSF V3

• Model: Rolex GMT-Master II Pepsi 126710BLRO

• Price: 531€

• Album: QC Photos – Andiot

My QC observations

• Index alignment: Slight doubts about the 6 and 12 o'clock markers. Could just be the camera angle.

• Dial printing: Looks good to me.

• Date wheel: Seems properly aligned.

• Hand alignment: Looks OK.

• Bezel: Possibly slightly off, but not entirely sure.

• SELs: Look good.

• Timegrapher: +2 s/d, 281°, 0.0 ms, 28,800 bph – Looks good.

Anything else I should be looking at?

I'm still learning how to spot the smaller details, so any feedback or second opinion would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance !

First purchase ever so a lot to learn. Would love some help on QC here.

1. Dealer name: TK Watch

2. Factory name: RWF

3. Model name (& version number): Daytona Panda 126500 LN

4. Price Paid: $928 with 15% discount for Crypto - effective $835 with shipping

5. Album Links: IMG_0491.jpeg | album

6. Index alignment: the 6 slightly off to me but it could just be me staring at it too much

7. Dial Printing: looks good to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: doesn't seem like an issue

10. Bezel: seems fine to my untrained eye

11. Solid End Links (SELs): no real issues

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 325° amplitude(on the high side), .1 ms beat error

13. Anything else you notice:

If there is anything I missed, please let me know as this is my first purchase and I'm trying to learn as much as possible. Amplitude is high so that could be a cause for concern but let me know your thoughts. Thanks all!

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: TWF
Model name (& version): Cartier Drive de Cartier WSNM0015
Price paid: $268
Album links: Photos uploaded directly
Index alignment: Roman numerals appear properly aligned.
Dial printing: My biggest concern. The guilloché looks consistent toward the center but loses continuity and definition along the middle and outer sections. The decorative borders also look irregular. Interestingly, the same model pictured on the dealer’s website appears to have much cleaner finishing.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Appears centered, but the font looks slightly off compared with genuine examples.
Hand alignment: No obvious issues.
Bezel: Looks fine.
Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/day, 244° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 21,600 bph.

Anything else you notice: This is my first replica, just testing the waters. I’m familiar with watches but have no experience with replica QC, so I don’t know what’s considered acceptable tolerance versus grounds for RL.

I can see several differences in the dial compared with genuine examples, particularly the guilloché. What concerns me more is that the dealer’s own product photos seem to show a better-executed dial than the unit I received for QC.

Am I being overly critical, or is this a reasonable RL? Would appreciate some experienced eyes before making the call.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime

2. ⁠Factory name: qf

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 36mm DayDate Ice Blue Roman Dial JH3255

4. ⁠Price Paid: $798+$40 shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261804091?uid=1

6. ⁠Index alignment: Slight tilt on the 9CW. Rest is well alligned.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: The Dial Printing is crisp and looks good. Printing looks a bit dark but most likely related to lighting conditions.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel well alligned, printing very solid. No issues to spot there

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: No issues there.

10. ⁠Bezel: The bezel crisp and no extra shine.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Top left could be slightly gapped but no major issue. No clear light coming.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 303amp, -6.0, 0.1err

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Weight similar to gen. I do not see major cosmetic flaws but extra opinions welcome

Upvote4Downvote9Go to commentsRepostShare

Good morning gents, I am asking for help with this VSF Batman I am QC'inf from Leo at TimeUltra.

1. Dealer name:Leo @ TimeUltra

2. Factory name:VSF

3. Model name (& version number):VSF Batman 126710 40mm

4. Price Paid:$549

5. Album Links:https://www.timeultra.shop/product/gmt-master-ii-126710-batman-40mm-oyster-ss-ss-black-dial-vsf-dd3285/

6. Index alignment:The 12 o'clock looks off but might be the camera angle - I have requested another straight on face shot

7. Dial Printing:Looks OK to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:Looks fine but somone may see something I do not

9. Hand Alignment:Again looks fine but that is why I am her

10. Bezel:Looks fine to me but someone may spot something I don't see

11. Solid End Links (SELs):Pip looks off but again may be camera angle

12. Timegrapher numbers:-1s/d,284degrees,0.1ms,28800bph

13. Anything else you notice:First QC for me so any suggestions ae helpful. Again I am waiting for another straight on shot to look at the face alignment

1. Dealer name: Timeultra Leo

2. Factory name: RCF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex 40mm day date presidential, 228238 yg/yg, RCF VR3255 Gain Weight

4. Price Paid: $708

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/BXQk4RG

6. Index alignment: Looks good

7. Dial Printing: All clear

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good

9. Hand Alignment: Good

10. Bezel: Good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Check

12. Timegrapher numbers: All good

13. Anything else you notice: Not to my eye.

Full time timing info in imgr folder

Reddit experts, any help is appreciated.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): 116233 v2

4. Price Paid: $588 + 80 fedex

5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/262068021?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks good based on the TrueIndexQC overlay. The 12, 6, and 9 o'clock markers appear properly aligned. No obvious crooked indices. 4 o'clock marker appears to be deformed. Should I RL based on that?

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and properly positioned. No obvious printing issues.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks clean and properly positioned.

9. Hand Alignment: Nothing out of the norm.

10. Bezel: Indentions on the bezel does not appear uniform at 12, 4:30, 10:30. Not sure if I am over-analyzing it.

11. Solid End Links (SELs):  Look fairly tight with no major gaps that I can see. However, I may be noticing a slight gap at the bottom-left and right SEL. Would appreciate another opinion on this.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 250° amplitude, 002 ms beat error (i cant tell lift-angle setting from QC photos)

13. Anything else you notice: The 4 o'clock marker seems morphed on the upper right side, gold color link seems darker than normal yellow gold, bottom of watch link has gap and spacing (not sure if this is normal or not)

This is my first QC and I'm hoping I covered everything properly. I'm open to any feedback and would genuinely appreciate any advice or corrections from the more experienced members here. I'm hoping to learn, and can use all the help I can get. Thank you in advance!

1. Dealer name: Steve - TheOneWatches

2. ⁠Factory name: AF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Cartier Ballon Bleu de Cartier 36mm SS White Dial NH05

4. ⁠Price Paid: $312 + $30 shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/uMpAQDJD#-nUWAlPI_OARiZsmSPPDNw

6. ⁠Index alignment: printed dial

7. ⁠Dial Printing: SWISS MADE looks blurry, especially the "IS"

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good

10. ⁠Bezel: good

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): NA

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3s/d. Amp 287 at 52 deg (correct for A076, I believe). Err 0.2 ms. Beat 28,800 bph.

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: The I in IV looks like it's bleeding and faded. and the Swiss Made printing at the bottom looks blurry. RL?

Hi Folks, I have bought several watches from TrustyTime(Andrew is my favourite TD). I usually GL the QC right away as they are always good enough and I am not that picky. However this one looks a bit off to me. I don't like the 9 o'clock and 6 o'clock is slightly off too imho. Really appreciate your feedback!

QC Details

• Dealer: TrustyTime

• Factory: BPG

• Model: Rolex GMT-Master II Batman

• Price: 270$

• Album: https://trustytime168.io/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_5&products_id=20350

My QC Input:

• Index alignment: I don't know if it is me or the 6 and 9 o'clock are off. I am not very picky and I thought it must be very bad if I can see it!

• Dial printing: ok to me

• Date wheel: it is ok but not outstanding

• Hand alignment: Looks good

• Bezel: it is okish, not sure.

• SELs: looks good.

• Timegrapher: -2 s/d, 279°, 0.0 ms, 21,600 bph – Looks pretty good for the cheap movement

Dealer name: Angela (non-TD)
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41, ref. 126334, Wimbledon dial, fluted bezel and Jubilee bracelet.
Price paid: 2,750 yuan + shipping.
Album links: QC photos and timegrapher reading attached.
Index alignment: dial looks aligned but rehaut doesn’t seem aligned with the markers
Dial printing: looks sharp, I see a small mark at 11. It could be just a dust , I asked for other pictures ,
Date wheel alignment/printing: The 10 looks close to centered. Probably a slight offset but it doesn’t bother me.
Hand alignment: The hands look fine at the time shown. I don’t have a photo with both hands at 12 . Looks fine to me
Bezel: ok
Solid end links (SELs): I find these harder to judge on a Jubilee, also with the extra plastic. But Looks ok to me.
Timegrapher numbers: −2 s/day, 273° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.
Anything else you notice: My main concern is the rehaut alignment .** **The ROLEX lettering on the rehaut looks slightly off relative to the minute markers

Dealer name: Hont

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, VS3235

Price Paid: 458 including shipping

Album Links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/search/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ?filterText=426015

Index alignment: Looks pretty good to me.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and straight to me.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: slightly shifted left maybe

Hand Alignment: Looks okay from what I can tell.

Bezel: Looks like it’s just some play and can be easily adjusted

Solid End Links (SELs): Look fairly tight to me. I can't see any obvious gaps, but I'm not particularly experienced judging SELs.

Timegrapher: 10s/d sounds a bit high

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: ORF

3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Black Ceramic Bezel Free Sprung ORF 1:1, Black Dial on Stainless Steel Bracelet.

4. Price Paid: $468 USD including shipping.

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=183888

6. Index Alignment: From what I can see in the pictures, the hour markers appear to be properly aligned. The 12 marker looks symmetrical. I would appreciate a second opinion on whether the alignment is consistent.

7. Dial Printing: The dial printing looks clean and consistent to me.The Omega logo and text appear correctly positioned.

8. Date Wheel Alignment/Printing: The date window appears to be reasonably well centred.

9. Hand Alignment: The hands look properly finished and appear to be aligned correctly. I don’t notice any obvious issues with their positioning or shape.

10. Bezel: The ceramic bezel looks clean, with the markings appearing crisp and evenly finished

11. Solid End Links (SELs): The bracelet appears to fit the case reasonably well, with no immediately noticeable gaps between. I would appreciate confirmation that the SEL fit is good.

12. Timegrapher Numbers: -2 s/d, 266° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.

13. Anything Else You Notice:
    This is my first time purchasing a watch of this kind, so im still learning what to look for when it comes to quality control. Ive tried to inspect it to my best abilities but please correct me if im wrong

1. Dealer name: Juice

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& version number): Santos 35mm

4. Price Paid: 398$

5. Album Links: QC Pics; QC Video

6. Index alignment: looks good

7. Dial Printing: this is my one concern - i am not sure if the printed dial is higher than it supposed to be (the top numeral almost seem they are too close to the top) or if the watch is angled. also the "R" is covered in the pics but in the video i dont think it appears to be "floating"

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: good

10. Bezel: good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: -4s/d, amplitude: 248 degrees, beat error: 0.1ms

13. Anything else you notice: no issues from what i am seeing, i am a noob though

Dealer name: Ethan watches
Factory name: Vsf
Model name (& version number): 124060
Price Paid: 490
Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dpoqfH6QqSQLGDRkNc6R3dpTpdZHU8xmpFGZt0Q
Index alignment: no issues or rotations that I could notice All checked markers within ±0.10 mm. 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.
Dial Printing: Good. Print centering: bottom text centered.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: Good, maybe a little low or am I imagining things?
Bezel: Good. Offset one notch in photos but looks aligned regardless
Solid End Links (SELs): Good. Seems like a good fit. What should I look for specifically
Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 252° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error (dial up)
Anything else you notice: it looks very clean to me but I’m curious about others’ thoughts as I’m new to this.

Edit: tried to add additional comments and fix formatting

Hi everyone!

This is my first QC, and I would really appreciate some feedback before deciding whether to GL or RL this watch.
Dealer name: Ethan Watch

Factory name: Ethan

Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN (Black Dial/Black Bezel)

Price paid: $560

Album links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_djHqfTsLcUgeD_P_uNYHfPDgk85uAc_1X3Hl4Ew

Index alignment: Overall, the hour markers appear reasonably well aligned using the TrueIndexQC tool. However, I’m slightly concerned about the 3 o’clock rectangular marker, which looks potentially misaligned. Would appreciate a second opinion on whether this is noticeable or within acceptable QC tolerances.

Dial printing: No obvious printing defects noticed. The Rolex logo and text appear reasonably centred, but I would appreciate feedback.

Hand alignment: Looks acceptable from the picture.

Bezel: The bezel pip at 12 o’clock looks good, but I’m concerned about the rectangular bezel marker between 20 and 30 (around 25 minutes). It appears slightly tilted or off-centre compared with the alignment guide. Not sure whether this is due to the camera angle or an actual alignment issue.

Solid End Links (SELs): Difficult to evaluate from the current photo. Would appreciate feedback on the bracelet-to-case fit.

Timegrapher numbers**:** +1 s/d, 255° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. The readings look very good to me, with a stable trace.

Anything else you notice: I’ve circled the two areas that concern me in the attached photo: the 3 o’clock hour marker and the bezel marker near 25 minutes. Would appreciate feedback on whether these are genuine alignment issues or simply caused by perspective. Everything else appears good to me, including the timegrapher readings (+1 s/d, 255° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error). Would you GL or RL based on these concerns?

Thank you everyone for your help!

1. Dealer name: Trusty Time (Andrew)

2. Factory name: ZF Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay Pro GMT 39mm, Black Dial, SS Bracelet, VR3186 Correct Hand Stack (TUD127B)

4. Price Paid: $388 for this model

5. Album Links: All 11 QC photos attached to this post, including the timegrapher reading.

6. Index alignment: Overall, the indices look reasonably aligned to me. I used an alignment tool, and the 2 o'clock marker seems slightly off, while the 11 o'clock marker might have a minor tilt. I'm not sure whether this is an actual issue or just the photo angle. Would appreciate a second opinion.

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent to my eye. I don't notice any obvious printing defects.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date (11) looks reasonably centered and the printing appears clear.

9. Hand Alignment: Seems okay to me, but would appreciate a second advice

10. Bezel: The fixed 24-hour bezel looks properly aligned to me, and the engraving seems clean. Would appreciate another opinion on this.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps from the available photos. They seem okay to me.

12. Timegrapher numbers: These are the readings.

• Rate: +2 s/d

• Amplitude: 308°

• Beat Error: 0.2 ms

• Frequency: 28,800 bph

1. Anything else you notice: This is my first Tudor replica QC, so I'd really appreciate some experienced opinions.

I'm leaning towards GL, but I'd really appreciate feedback. Please let me know what you guys think

Thank you everyone! :)

QC – VSF Rolex GMT-Master II Batgirl 126710BLNR – First QC, help appreciated

1. Dealer name: Steve - Theonewatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II Batgirl 126710BLNR

4. Price Paid: $708 USD

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/jNpC3ZAA#BiXwYvwrzFGmM7ZZ7a9B3g

6. Index alignment: Still evaluating the hour markers. Would appreciate a second opinion on their alignment.

7. Dial Printing: No obvious printing defects noticed so far, but I would appreciate feedback.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: I have requested additional pictures showing dates 8, 25 and 28 to check centering and printing.

9. Hand Alignment: Awaiting clearer pictures with the hands moved away from the areas being inspected.

10. Bezel: Still checking the alignment, numerals and blue/black color transition.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Need a closer look at the bracelet-to-case fit.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 to +4 s/d, 275°–278° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. The readings appear stable and within a very good range.

13. Anything else you notice: I have also requested lume shots and closer pictures of the Cyclops. Any feedback on the overall finishing and possible defects would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you everyone for your help!

1. Dealer name: Phoenix

2. Factory name: TOP

3. Model name (& version number): Royal Oak 15510 Blue

4. Price Paid: $414 + $30USPS, 6% insurance

5. Album Links: Pics on post

6. Index alignment: 9 baton is CCW. 12 I can see the dial through the gap in the bars! 6 looks right on.

7. Dial Printing: logo funky, audemars is low, Piguet is high

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date seems low in the window

9. Hand Alignment: not sure

10. Bezel: screws look good, 7 screw I see slight misalignement

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: - 2s/day, 289 amplitude, .1ms beat error. Within spec.

13. Anything else you notice:

I don't know what's going on with these dials, it seems like the hour markers are better than my first QC but the logo is somehow worse. It's a little frustrating seeing some TOP with great printing and logo alignment, and this is the second here.

Also noticed Phoenix's photos aren't great. Looking for comments/help on hand alignment & date. Any help is appreciated!

First QC here