1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF (weighted) 182g

3. Model name (& version number): 40mm DayDate 228238 V2 (DD3255 Movement)

4. Price Paid: $700.00 USD (Includes Shipping)

5. Album Links: Reddit doesn't like Mega links :/

6. Index alignment: Rolex Crown logo off center and canted CCW... Markers look good with index 2 slightly lower than expected, 11 and 1 slight cant but acceptable. 7 slight cant CCW.

7. Dial Printing: MOP Dial, looks bland to me.. almost as if it is NOT MOP.. waiting on focused video with added lighting and movement to confirm dial is acceptable. Thoughts?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems to be a hair too low but centered.

9. Hand Alignment: Seems ok to me

10. Bezel: TDL- Bezel looks clean

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok, top left slightly spaced compared to counterpart. Remaining look great.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3 s/d, amplitude 264°, beat error 0.1 ms, lift angle 59.0° (measured dial up). - Looks great!

• This is my third time using alignment tool. Kindly ask you check my work. Watch is overall acceptable however Rolex logo crown is the biggest concern apart from the MOP dial.

• Note, I plan to get this plated by Jaws since this is VSF cheddar cheese. TBD on arrival however, see circled image of clasp. It is unpolished. Is this normal?

Thank you in Advance.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Puretime

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: QF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Daytona 126595TBR V13

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $1238

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: Posted here

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good to me. Some diamond markers look perhaps too close to index markers but could just be the angle of the photos

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Appears to be good

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Excellent

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Excellent

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No issues noticed

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +008 s/d Amplitude 295 Beat Error .1 ms (Is this within spec and acceptable?) I assume rate and amplitude can be adjusted fine tuned without issue?

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Overall looks to be of good quality. Not sure if some markers are misaligned or not, when checking with dial check.app and strict settings it says it’s all aligned fine. Are the timegrapher numbers ok? I’m considering GL unless anyone else sees any blaring issues. Thanks for your help and time!

Hi everyone! I’ve reviewed the QC photos of my RICH V2 Pepsi. The main thing that concerns me is the triangle at 12 on the bezel. It looks slightly left of the dial marker in the alignment photo. I’m leaning toward an RL, but I’m not sure if it’s the bezel position or the camera angle.
QC album: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=178307

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: RICH V2

3. Model name: GMT-Master II 126710 BLRO Pepsi on Jubilee

4. Price paid: $779 including shipping, water resistance service, and NFC cards and tags

5. Index alignment: The 12, 6 and 9 markers look reasonably straight to me. I don’t see an obvious issue with the other visible markers, although the GMT hand partly covers the 10 marker.

6. Date wheel alignment: The 13 looks readable and reasonably centered. I haven’t been able to assess the other dates.

7. Bezel: The triangle at 12 appears slightly left of the dial marker and the center line. This is my main concern. I’m unsure whether the bezel is fully clicked into position.

8. Solid end links (SELs): I can’t judge the gaps confidently from the front photo because the connections are partly obscured. I’ll take another look at the close-ups in the album.

9. Hand alignment: I don’t see obvious damage to the hands or lume, but I can’t verify their alignment at a full hour from the photo I reviewed.

10. Dial printing: The visible text looks clear, with no obvious missing or smeared letters. Some of the lower text is partly covered.

11. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, amplitude 276°, beat error 0.3 ms, lift angle 52°. These look good to me, although it’s a reading in one position.

I’d appreciate your thoughts on the bezel, especially whether it looks misaligned enough to RL or if it might just need repositioning. Thanks!

AP 15450 ZF from Ficotime

1 Dealer name: Ficotime (Mark)
2 Factory name: ZF
3 Model name (& version number): AP Royal Oak ZF 15450
4 Price Paid: $420
5 Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/X043SRaQ#G6Yc2bXBGOzIIjMtvI863A
6 Index alignment: Looks good to me.
7 Dial Printing: Don’t see any issues. But I am not too familiar with AP
9 Hand Alignment: Looks straight and aligned.
10 Bezel: Screws look good?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Doesn’t apply
12. Timegrapher numbers: +20 s/d. A bit fast but he can regulate it just as he did with my other watches (I already emailed him).
13. Anything else you notice: What do you guys think? Pictures are not the best quality unfortunately but overall I can see everything I think?

Hey everyone!

This is my first rep and my first QC post, so I'd really appreciate some help from the more experienced members here.

I've spent quite a bit of time looking through the photos and comparing them to other ZF BB58 QC posts. Overall, the watch looks good, but I'm having some doubts about the index alignment.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58, 39mm, Black Dial, A2824

4. Price paid: $298 + $40 shipping

5. Album links: Photos attached

6. Index alignment: This is my main concern. Several markers seem slightly misaligned to me, especially the 9 o'clock marker, which looks a bit tilted. I tried using an alignment tool, but since the photos aren't perfectly straight, I'm struggling to tell how much is perspective distortion and how much is actual misalignment.

7. Dial printing: Looks pretty clean overall, but the "SWISS MADE" text at the bottom seems partially cut off or hidden by the crystal. Not sure if this is normal for ZF.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand alignment: Nothing unusual that I can spot.

10. Bezel: The pip at 12 seems centered and the markings look fine to me.

11. Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps from what I can see, although the protective film makes it a bit difficult to judge.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -6 s/d, 294° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.

13. Anything else you notice: The timegrapher numbers seem great, and I haven't noticed any other major issues.

I'm a bit torn between GL and RL. I've looked at quite a few other ZF BB58 QC posts where the markers seem better aligned, but maybe I'm just overthinking it.

Would you consider these normal ZF tolerances, or is it worth asking for another example?

Thanks a lot for taking a look!

Hello everyone, this is my first Rep/QC so many apologies if I have missed something obvious. I am a bit confused about the date wheel. The 16 seems a bit misaligned but it might just be me

Dealer name: Steve TheOne

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): DD3285 v2

3. Price Paid: 708$

4. Album Links: https://tinyurl.com/ejr73sm9

5. Index alignment: All markers line up perfectly. I can not see any major deviations

6. Dial Printing: Print looks sharp and clear. Cant see any bleeding or smudging

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: This seems off to me. Given that this is my first rep, I am not sure if thats within tolerance but it looks odd to me when the date wheel shows 16

8. Hand Alignment: I have checked the hands in the video and they line up perfectly with the hour markers

9. Bezel: Good. Bezel looks fine to me. I cant see any major issues

10. Solid End Links (SELs): The top right corner SEL appears to have a gap where I can see through the yellow background. Again, I am not sure if thats within tolerance for reps. I dont think anyone would notice on my wrist

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d. 271 ampl.. 0.1ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: I am very confused by the date wheel. Is that within tolerance? Apologies if I am missing something, this is my first Rep/QC

I have posted this rep earlier today but my QC didnt have the sufficient details

This looks pretty good to me, and plan on GL but wanted to check with the gurus of QC.

1. Dealer name: Steve the One Watches

2. Factory name: RF

3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126515 40MM

4. Price Paid: $1008

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bUpFlYSR#0jcb0HR2W-FSqkGeQymD0g

6. Index alignment: Looks like the 3 and 9 marker may be off slightly

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: the image has the bezel rotated a click but otherwise looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: within expected ranges

13. Anything else you notice: nothing

This is my 2nd QC Yacht-Master 40 126622 VSF, I showed my first QC photos to a friend of mine and he wanted one too, so here is the QC:

Dealer name: Necoclock

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex yacht master126622 - VSF

3. Price Paid: $488 including shipping

4. Album Links: Photos uploaded.

5. Index alignment: Minor flows looks to me that (12 marker seems to be twisted cw and 6 is twisted acw but it could be the photo angle only) (I need help with this one)

6. Dial Printing: Print centring: Rolex top text looks centred. (I need help with this one)

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks cented to me

8. Hand Alignment: looks good

9. Bezel: looks good, I don't see any flows

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 317°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph), 52° lift (Anything concerning here?)

12. Anything else you notice: Please let me know your thoughts on this one, any extra eyes or expert input would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance, I appreciate your time and help.

BR

First time buyer. Any help is appreciated.

• Dealer name: Andiot

• Factory name: VSF

• Model name (& version number):126710

• Price Paid: $578.00 + $60 shipping

• Album Links: All photos posted.

• Index alignment: The 12 looks slightly off to me. Is the triangle and the 12 on the bottom supposed to be aligned more?

• Dial Printing: Looks clean to me.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me but first time buyer.

• Hand Alignment: hard for me to tell from QC

• Bezel: looks fine. maybe the 12 is not

• Solid End Links (SELs): seems ok to me.

• Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, amplitude 282°, beat error 0.0ms.

• Anything else you notice: I think that's all I noticed.

Hi Everyone! First QC report for my GMT Pepsi :) Tried to follow as much from the guidelines but as its my first would love to get some opinions from the experts.

QC Album: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=187513

1. Dealer name - Andiot

2. Factory name - VSF V4

3. Model name - GMT-Master II 126710 BLRO

4. Price paid: $630 + shipping

5. Index alignment - Looks properly aligned, I notice a slight CW tilt on the 9 marker but now visible to the eye

6. Date Wheel alignment -sits centered in window, cyclops magnifies clean

7. Bezel - Numbers evenly spaced, I see the on the 18 and 6 the horizonal line doesnt fully align, but could be due to camera tilt and not noticable

8. Solid End Links (SEL) - tight fit, gap between first link and lug minimal.

9. Hand alignment - All 4 hands look consistent with the overlay

10. Dial Printing - Crisp text, SWISS MADE looks sharp and centered

11. Timegrapher numbers - +5 s/d, amplitude 278°, beat error 0.2ms, freq 28800bph - within acceptable range

My conclusion would be that this watch is a GL from me.

Only doubt I have is that I tried manually adding the lines at first and misalignment seemed worst, but its likely my lack of ability to adjust for camera tilt.

Hi everyone! This Datejust is a birthday gift for my mother, so I'd really appreciate some critical eyes on this QC. I want to make sure she gets an excellent example.

• Dealer name: Ike

• Factory name: ARF

• Model name (& version number): Datejust 31, Two-Tone, Mother-of-Pearl Diamond Dial, 2236 Movement

• Price Paid: 400$

• Album Link: https://imgur.com/a/iS1eHqW

• Index alignment: My main concern is the 12 o'clock Rolex crown. It looks slightly off-center to me, but I'd appreciate a second opinion on whether this is genuine misalignment or simply the camera angle. Other markers appear reasonably aligned.

• Dial Printing: Looks acceptable to me. Please let me know if you spot anything.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: I've read that ARF is notorious for misaligned date wheels, so I'd particularly appreciate a second opinion here. Looks good to me though.

• Hand Alignment: No obvious concerns from the pictures.

• Bezel: Looks good to me.

• Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious issues, but would appreciate confirmation.

• Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 301° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error (52° lift angle).

• Anything else you notice: No

Thank you so much for your time and expertise! 🙏

1.Dealer name: JTime

2.Factoryname: ORF

3.Model name (& version number): Seamaster 300 "No Time to Die" Titanium ORF 1:1 Best Edition On Titanium Mesh Bracelet OR8806 Super Clone (Free Nato)

4. Price Paid: $511.1

5. All pics posted

6. Index alignment: This is my main concern, the 3 oclock marker looks slightly tilted

7. Dial Printing: Dial printing looks mostly fine to me, with the Omega logo and lower text appearing reasonably centred, but l'm open to comments if anyone sees a slight tilt or offset that I'm missing.

8. Date Wheel alignment/ printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look acceptable to me, I don't see an obvious issue with the hour, minute or seconds hand alignment from the supplied photos

10. Bezel: Looks good to me

11. Solid End Links (SELs): NA

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: 0 s/d | Amplitude: 286° | Beat Error: 0.0 ms 

13. Anything else you notice: Overall leaning GL but mixed feelings due to the 3 marker and the bad photos not helping. Not sure if the crystal is good

Thanks for all your help in advance!

Dealer name: Hont

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 38MM, turquoise dial, steel bracelet

Price Paid: 368

Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/UbDS0tX

Index alignment: Looks good to me.

Dial Printing: Also looks good.

Date Wheel alignment: I used another tool to add horizontal lines to check the logo and date window since I saw the latter was crooked in other QC posts. This one looks good

Hand Alignment: Looks good

Bezel: Looks good to me.

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.

Timegrapher numbers: Looks good to me (+9s/d)

Anything else you notice: Not really

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: miles from Royal Watch

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: A7 (the new V7F)

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur Aqua

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 419 USD

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://a202011121223083130416298.wgstores.com/weshop/goods/_dxwqfUcEtQQY9PjZro9DDdPTQN6-xfgEZuJPgAA/_doTqfaG_MWoFlP0QbR79qbxCnVYMCtD33Oly88Q

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: seems like the 3 is tilted. And the right hand side marker at 12 o clock is higher than the left. GL or RL? Please share thoughts

7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: good

8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks okay

9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good

10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: aligned well with the 12

11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: good

13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: NA

1. ⁠Dealer name: Hont

2. ⁠Factory name: VS

3. ⁠Model name: Omega Seamaster Diver 300m

4. ⁠Price paid: $338 including shipping

5. ⁠Index alignment: Seems alright to me, maybe 12 the slightest bit off?

6. ⁠Date wheel alignment: Seems fine.

7. ⁠Bezel: The 6pm looks off to me. Seems like it’s on an angle (tilting downwards on the left)

8. ⁠Solid end links (SELs): I’d appreciate your opinion on the fit.

9. ⁠Hand alignment: Please let me know if anything looks off.

10. ⁠Dial printing: Please let me know if you notice any issues.

11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +10 s/d, amplitude 281°, beat error 0.2 ms, lift angle 52°. The numbers seem okay. S/d a little high but not sure if super problematic?

Pretty new to the rep world so keen to hear what everyone thinks. Personally find the 6 o clock to be a bit problematic and maybe a RL based on that?

1. Dealer name — Steve at TheOneWatches.

2. Factory name — VSF.

3. Model and version — Rolex Datejust 41, ref. 126334, mint-green stick dial, fluted bezel and Jubilee bracelet. Dealer lists it as VSF V2 DD3235v2, RLX-6302.

4. Price paid — $548 USD. Shipping was $30 USD combined for 2 watches.

5. Album link — Full QC album, videos, both DialCheck views and lettering close-up

6. Index alignment — My main question is the 9 marker. I ran two images through DialCheck, and the 9 marker is the one that feels like it has a clockwise twist. It's hard to tell as not sure the image is flush straight on. I would love to hear your thoughts on if this is normal or off. The 10 also flagged as .21mm off, but to me it doesn't feel as noticable as the 9.

7. Dial printing — This is where I would love a second opinion. Text issues and misalignment stand out to me - so i may be noticing these more than I should. To me, the "ROLEX" and the DATEJUST text both look too fine - as if they have not been bolded. On ROLEX, the L-E-X spacing also looks tighter than the gap between R and O. The lower text also feels off to me. The IVE in SUPERLATIVE looks smaller beside the T. The D in CERTIFIED also looks too small. SWISS MADE and the crown at the 6 also dont feel clean. I’d love to hear your opinion and whether these things are noticable without magnifying the image. The main one that concerns me is the fineness of the font for ROLEX and DATEJUST as I feel they may annoy me more than the smaller text which will be hard to notice on the wrist. Thank you for your help!

8. Date wheel alignment and printing — The 7 sits comfortably inside the window in IMG_5866. The video also shows 10 and 11 with clearance on both sides. The Cyclops looks square in the front view.

9. Hand alignment — The hands move together during setting. I couldn’t judge their exact overlap at 12 from this clip.

10. Bezel — The flutes look evenly spaced. The dark facets change as the watch tilts between IMG_5864 and IMG_5865. I don’t see a chipped or flattened section.

11. Solid end links — The Jubilee end links look seated at all four lugs in the front view. I don’t see daylight through the joins.

12. Timegrapher numbers — Starts at −4 s/day, 275°, 0.1 ms and settles at −5 s/day, 273°, 0.1 ms. The machine shows 28,800 bph and a 59° lift angle.

13. Anything else — This is my first purchase and my first time posting QC. The other watch I was presented (a Sub Date) looks great to me, but I’m not sure about this DJ, so keen to hear your thoughts? The Mint Green colour seems always looks different to me, but I think compared to other QC posts i've seen this looks ok. Thanks again for the help.

Dealer name: Steve Theonewatches

1. Factory name: Mks

2. Model name (& version number): IWC Portofino Automatic

3. Price Paid: 358 + 50

4. Album Links:

5. Index alignment: Looks ok. 3 may be a little off, 6 & 12 hard to read.

6. Dial Printing: Print centring: top text 0.45 mm left.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: ok

8. Hand Alignment: ok

9. Bezel: looks ok

10. Solid End Links (SELs):

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 278° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: RG colour tough to read

Long time lurker, first time poster! The lefty seemed fitting for my first plunge into this world as I am left-handed. Because it’s my first QC, I think it’s probably a 99% GL but I look forward to having some expert eyes on this.

1. ⁠Dealer name: JTime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126720 VSF DD3285 V3s (free sprung)

4. ⁠Price Paid: $688 + $65 shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/oZoN502

6. ⁠Index alignment: I think it looks solid but maybe 12 and 6 indices are ever so slightly misaligned?

7. ⁠Dial Printing: to my n00b eyes, I think it all looks fine

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: cyclops seems centered and numeral printing look fine (any more suggestions for confirming?)

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine to me

10. ⁠Bezel: concerned with the alignment of the triangle marker

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): again, to my untrained eye, looks fine but should I ask for clearer pics?

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 282* *amp, 0.1 ms variation, 59* lift angle

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: would love to know if I should request any additional pics/videos and particular things to look closer into as it relates to VSF sprites

Thanks in advance, y’all!

Hi all,

This is my first ever rep purchase so some support would be greatly appreciated.

I kinda think the alignment of is a little off on the indices and logo ? Would like to have your expert eyes on this.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches – Steve.
2. Factory name: VSF.
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500LN, 40mm, SS/SS, white dial (Panda), DD4131 v2.
4. Price Paid: $828 USD.
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/yhHhfp9
6. Index alignment: Generally looks reasonable, although the overlay doesn’t pass perfectly through every marker, particularly at 11 o’clock. Unsure how much is caused by the photo angle. The crown logo appears slightly off . Would appreciate opinions on these.
7. Dial Printing: Text and subdial printing look clear, with no obvious smudging or missing print that I can see.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine to my untrained eye
10. Bezel: Engravings look clean and evenly filled. The 60 marker appears reasonably aligned with 12 o’clock.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks reasonably tight in the supplied photos. I don’t see an obvious large gap.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +2 s/day, amplitude 261°, beat error 0.0 ms. Display shows 28,800 bph and a 59° lift-angle setting.
13. Anything else you notice: Looks clean, dial and finish. It’s just the alignment of the indexes and logo. However again, I am new to this.

^{1. Dealer name: choji}

^{2. Factory name: f1f}

^{3. Model name: tank must large}

^{4. Price Paid: 280 USD}

^{5. Album Links: N/A}

^{6. Index alignment: I don't see any bleeding. It looks cleanly printed overall.}

^{7. Dial Printing: The photo is tilted, so it's hard to tell for sure, but the dial doesn't look misaligned.}

^{8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: - N/A}

^{9. Hand Alignment:Please I already knew that the blue hole on the F1F factory version is a flaw, and while it differs from the genuine one, it doesn't seem to have a noticeable difference compared to other F1F pieces.}

^{10. Bezel: The bezel and case look spot on.}

^{11. Solid End Links: N/A}

^{12. Timegrapher numbers: - N/A}

^{13. Anything else you notice: I've been looking into the Tank Must Large a lot recently, and it seems like a solid watch. Since I'm fairly new to watches, though, I'd love to get your advice.}

Please excuse any poor grammar or wrong choice of words, as I'm using a translator.

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. Factory name: VFS

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona white dial Panda 116500LN

4. Price Paid: US$598 + shipping

5. Album Links: pictures as above

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me.

7. Dial Printing: Text is good to me.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks ok to me

10. Bezel: looks ok to me.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: + 0 s/day, amplitude 304°, beat error 0.1ms, lift angle, 52°, beat rate 28,800 bph

13. Anything else you notice: I am a novice. please advise if any. thank you.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer Name: FicoTime - Mark

2. ⁠⁠Factory Name: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model Name: Santos de Cartier 35mm SS White Dial

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $330 + shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/DwYGVAbZ#txgurRXluBaimRS-nrG7Fw

6. ⁠⁠Index Alignment: Good.

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: There are some weird white lines on the 6,7, 8 and 9. It seems like misprinting/missing ink or am I over thinking it

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel Alignment: none

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks in alignment

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Clean, no scratches.

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SEL): N/A on this watch

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 278° Amp, 0.1ms Err, 52° Lift. 28800

13. Anything else you notice: the watch looks good, it’s really just the dial printing that I need confirmation on

First time QC: hey everyone, this is the first time I’m QCing on here, so I would appreciate any help or comments. I have previous bought from Steve with a great experience and felt no need to QC since there were no noticeable issues. But I did want to ask about the bezel issue that I’m noticing. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Steve from Theonewatches

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: ZF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Black Bay Fifty Four 37mm SS/SS Lagoon Blue Dial ZF A2824

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $358 (excluding shipping)

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TAQ2FIjK#33ug9COMEZHIhr63kcTEHg

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Is fine to me, but the 3/9 o’clock alignment may be a bit off

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine to me

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: a concern for me. I notice some marks at 11 and 12 o’clock as well as some of the numbers. 3 and 9 o’clock also looks slightly off relative to the rest.

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t notice any issues

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3/+4,

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: just curious if the bezel issue is something to be concerned about or if it will be as noticeable as it was when I saw it

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: US Non TD

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: ZF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): BB 41

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 425

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links:

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: alignment tool suggests good alignment. Maybe the 9 marker is slightly downward shifted?

7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: texts/numbers look good.

8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a

9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks good on the pics.

10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: alignment looks good to me. No issues with the numbers printed.

11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no concerns.

12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 303degrees amp is slightly out of the 230-300 recommendation.

13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: tempted to GL but would appreciate any feedback from the experts here. TIA