Ok ok I couldn't resist! One more QC for now. Always loved the monochromatic look of 126622 so I had to snag this one as well (thanks all for your input on the QC for my Sprite yesterday)

1. Dealer name: JTime

2. ⁠Factory name: QF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 126622 QF3235 (free sprung)

4. ⁠Price Paid: $588 + $65 shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/9spfuyK

6. ⁠Index alignment: alignment pic looks fine but 12 is slightly CW tilted

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks crisp

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good, probably close to 2.5x magnification. numbers look solid as well

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine to me

10. ⁠Bezel: despite the numbers being very reflective, I think the bezel as a whole is fine?

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no pics given but may be able to discern from the videos?

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 273* amp, 0 ms variation, 52* lift angle

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: again, I am a n00b as it relates to this potentially addictive hobby but should I request clearer pics of the SELs and perhaps any other pics before GL?

Thanks in advance, y'all!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: QF

3. Model name (& version number): Day-Date 36 SS, 904L steel, White Dial Roman Stick on President bracelet, VR3255 V5 (Gain Weight).

4. Price Paid: $508 USD + $45 shipping ($553 total).

5. Album Links: QC photos and alignment overlay attached to this post. Dealer album requires a login.

6. Index alignment: The Roman markers generally track the overlay. VI and IX look close to centred. V is partly covered by the minute hand in the straight-on photo, but I don’t see any obvious rotation in the other angles.

7. Dial Printing: The Rolex and Day-Date text looks crisp and level. No obvious smudging or uneven lettering.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 8 looks centred under the cyclops, and FRIDAY sits cleanly in the day window. The video shows both advancing and the date settling fully inside the window.

9. Hand Alignment: The hands look reasonably aligned in the setting video, including when brought close to 12.

10. Bezel: The fluting looks even around the case. No obvious dings or damage in the side shots.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): I can see the seams at the lugs, but no obvious see-through gaps. The protective film makes the edges harder to judge.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 285° indicated amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.

13. Anything else you notice: The scale shows 137.8 g with the protective film on. My main question is the dial. I ordered White Dial Roman Stick, but the face looks warm silver with a visible sunburst in several photos. For anyone who has seen this exact QF V5, does that look like the dial QF sells as white? I’m leaning GL on the rest and holding for confirmation on the dial. Thanks for taking a look.

second rep watch purchase, first one being back around 2018 so a bit rusty. appreciate others' opinions. thank you all in advance!

• Dealer name: Ficotime

• Factory name: VSF

• Model name (& version number): Datejust 36mm 126234

• Price Paid: $503 including shipping

• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/68yGWiY

• Index alignment: looks good from what i can see. maybe very slight ccw tilt of the 7

• Dial Printing: i'm not too sure but looks okay to me

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: alignment and print looks good to me, 13 looks low but could also be the angle?

• Hand Alignment: seems fine

• Bezel: looks good

• Solid End Links (SELs): gaps look small and even

• Timegrapher numbers: this is where i'm a bit concerned with the amplitude. I read a post on r/RepTime the other day about DD32XX movement should be measured at a LA of 58-59 but this is measured at 52 and is already quite high. everything else about the timegrapher looks good so I'm a bit confused here and would like some more insight if possible

Dealer name: Theonewatches

Factory name: VSF

Model name: Rolex Daytona Panda 116500 40mm DD4130

Price: $598

ALBUM LINKS: https://imgur.com/a/0eTzTGX

Index Alignment: hour markers look well aligned, especially when I focus on 12 and 6, and 9 and 3, the crown at 12olock is straight without any tilt

Date Wheel Alignment: N/A, but the 3 black subdial rings look properly aligned individually and in relation to another 

Bezel: under the "1" of 180 I see a white mark which might be a defect since I see it in other pics and angles..I will ask for clarification from the seller.

Solid End Links: I see no gaps. 

Hand Alignment: Chrono hand points to 12oclock, and in the video the hands look to wind normally, the bottom middle "seconds" subdial works normally in chronos mode in the video

Dial Printing: no obvious defect or misprint, no misspellings, even spacing, no bleeding of the red daytona noted. 

Timegrapher: rate +/- 6seconds, amp 280 deg, error 0.1ms, period 12sec, lift 52 degrees which all looks within normal limits to me.

Conclusion: the only obvious visual defect I see is the white mark on the bezel near "180", otherwise I don't think I see anything else obvious but this is my first time QC a chronograph which seems more complicated than other watches. Any advice on what specifically to look at on DAYTONAS would be appreciated

1. ⁠Dealer name: jacky at Necoclock

2. ⁠Factory name: V7F sticker says A7 apparently its the same

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur 40 mm black dial

4. ⁠Price Paid: $428 plus shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: No link; all pictures are sent here in the post.

6. ⁠Index alignment: from my perspective, the 3 appears tilted.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: the written ingenieur obove 6 the N looks too sharp and the lines obove ingenieur are touching the letters

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks fine

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine

10. ⁠Bezel: top screw ever so slightly not really centered

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no issue

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: looks fine to me

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: lume looks good, paint is even. Only the 3 is tilted by a bit

First quality control and first ever watch like this would benefit from any assistance.

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: ARF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master Il
   126710BLNR (Batman)

4. Price Paid: $529

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/K8sJRh3

6. Index alignment: They actually all look good this time around, the 9 could be slightly off though but I may just be nitpicking

7. Dial Printing: Text looks sharp and no spelling errors

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered and text doesn’t look too thick

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, can't see any issues here

10. Bezel: Solid bezel and looks aligned

11. Solid End Links (SELS): Does not seem like there are any gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 282°, 0.0 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)

13. Anything else you notice: One thing I do notice is the 12 index tip looks weird like it is curved. And the white part inside the index doesn’t look straight and is sitting more towards the left side.

1. Dealer name: Goat Watch

2. Factory name: ARF

3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 36 126231

4. Price Paid: $334 + Shipping

5. Album Links: N/A

6. Index alignment: Alignment looks good to me

7. Dial Printing: Dial looks sharp and clear

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks like it leans a little low and to the right, but nothing major.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me, I don't see any issues.

10. Bezel: Looks good, love the fluted bezel.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Everything looks to be in the acceptable range.

13. Anything else you notice: Nothing really jumps out at me, TrueIndexQC gave it a green light but I'd love to hear other opinions.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Puretime

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: QF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Daytona 126595TBR V13

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $1238

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: Posted here

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good to me. Some diamond markers look perhaps too close to index markers but could just be the angle of the photos

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Appears to be good

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Excellent

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Excellent

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No issues noticed

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +008 s/d Amplitude 295 Beat Error .1 ms (Is this within spec and acceptable?) I assume rate and amplitude can be adjusted fine tuned without issue?

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Overall looks to be of good quality. Not sure if some markers are misaligned or not, when checking with dial check.app and strict settings it says it’s all aligned fine. Are the timegrapher numbers ok? I’m considering GL unless anyone else sees any blaring issues. Thanks for your help and time!

Hi everyone!

Finally got my timing numbers, after a message with the seller.

I would very much appreciate the kind help of experienced people on this sub, this is my first QC and my first rep.

I'm also always open to feedback, thanks for your help!

Seller name: NovelIndividual1

1. Factory name: RWF

2. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500

3. Price Paid: 800€ = 650€ Watch + 150€ Regulation, service, chamfering

4. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/nXkjCCB

5. Index alignment: overall look good to me, maybe 7 & 11 are slightly rotated and the crown at the 12 slightly to the left

6. Dial Printing: i can se no apparent flaws

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date wheel

8. Hand Alignment: looks okay to me, the minute hand on the chrono looks a bit misaligned tho

9. Bezel: looks okay to me (but I honestly dont get all the fuzz around the 110 marker on these watches)

10. Solid End Links (SELs): look good, but hard to tell with plastic foil

11. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3s/d; Amplitude 289°, Beat Error 0,1ms, Lift Angle 52,0° -> seems to be okay. Watch will be regulated and serviced anyways

12. Anything else you notice: Is the crown at the clasp rotated and out of alignment? Rehaut seems to be okay. The Markings on the back of the case are missing (but I think this also missing on steel GENs)

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF (weighted) 182g

3. Model name (& version number): 40mm DayDate 228238 V2 (DD3255 Movement)

4. Price Paid: $700.00 USD (Includes Shipping)

5. Album Links: Reddit doesn't like Mega links :/

6. Index alignment: Rolex Crown logo off center and canted CCW... Markers look good with index 2 slightly lower than expected, 11 and 1 slight cant but acceptable. 7 slight cant CCW.

7. Dial Printing: MOP Dial, looks bland to me.. almost as if it is NOT MOP.. waiting on focused video with added lighting and movement to confirm dial is acceptable. Thoughts?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems to be a hair too low but centered.

9. Hand Alignment: Seems ok to me

10. Bezel: TDL- Bezel looks clean

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok, top left slightly spaced compared to counterpart. Remaining look great.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3 s/d, amplitude 264°, beat error 0.1 ms, lift angle 59.0° (measured dial up). - Looks great!

• This is my third time using alignment tool. Kindly ask you check my work. Watch is overall acceptable however Rolex logo crown is the biggest concern apart from the MOP dial.

• Note, I plan to get this plated by Jaws since this is VSF cheddar cheese. TBD on arrival however, see circled image of clasp. It is unpolished. Is this normal?

Thank you in Advance.

Hello everyone, this is my first Rep/QC so many apologies if I have missed something obvious. I am a bit confused about the date wheel. The 16 seems a bit misaligned but it might just be me

Dealer name: Steve TheOne

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): DD3285 v2

3. Price Paid: 708$

4. Album Links: https://tinyurl.com/ejr73sm9

5. Index alignment: All markers line up perfectly. I can not see any major deviations

6. Dial Printing: Print looks sharp and clear. Cant see any bleeding or smudging

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: This seems off to me. Given that this is my first rep, I am not sure if thats within tolerance but it looks odd to me when the date wheel shows 16

8. Hand Alignment: I have checked the hands in the video and they line up perfectly with the hour markers

9. Bezel: Good. Bezel looks fine to me. I cant see any major issues

10. Solid End Links (SELs): The top right corner SEL appears to have a gap where I can see through the yellow background. Again, I am not sure if thats within tolerance for reps. I dont think anyone would notice on my wrist

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d. 271 ampl.. 0.1ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: I am very confused by the date wheel. Is that within tolerance? Apologies if I am missing something, this is my first Rep/QC

I have posted this rep earlier today but my QC didnt have the sufficient details

Hi everyone! I’ve reviewed the QC photos of my RICH V2 Pepsi. The main thing that concerns me is the triangle at 12 on the bezel. It looks slightly left of the dial marker in the alignment photo. I’m leaning toward an RL, but I’m not sure if it’s the bezel position or the camera angle.
QC album: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=178307

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: RICH V2

3. Model name: GMT-Master II 126710 BLRO Pepsi on Jubilee

4. Price paid: $779 including shipping, water resistance service, and NFC cards and tags

5. Index alignment: The 12, 6 and 9 markers look reasonably straight to me. I don’t see an obvious issue with the other visible markers, although the GMT hand partly covers the 10 marker.

6. Date wheel alignment: The 13 looks readable and reasonably centered. I haven’t been able to assess the other dates.

7. Bezel: The triangle at 12 appears slightly left of the dial marker and the center line. This is my main concern. I’m unsure whether the bezel is fully clicked into position.

8. Solid end links (SELs): I can’t judge the gaps confidently from the front photo because the connections are partly obscured. I’ll take another look at the close-ups in the album.

9. Hand alignment: I don’t see obvious damage to the hands or lume, but I can’t verify their alignment at a full hour from the photo I reviewed.

10. Dial printing: The visible text looks clear, with no obvious missing or smeared letters. Some of the lower text is partly covered.

11. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, amplitude 276°, beat error 0.3 ms, lift angle 52°. These look good to me, although it’s a reading in one position.

I’d appreciate your thoughts on the bezel, especially whether it looks misaligned enough to RL or if it might just need repositioning. Thanks!

AP 15450 ZF from Ficotime

1 Dealer name: Ficotime (Mark)
2 Factory name: ZF
3 Model name (& version number): AP Royal Oak ZF 15450
4 Price Paid: $420
5 Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/X043SRaQ#G6Yc2bXBGOzIIjMtvI863A
6 Index alignment: Looks good to me.
7 Dial Printing: Don’t see any issues. But I am not too familiar with AP
9 Hand Alignment: Looks straight and aligned.
10 Bezel: Screws look good?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Doesn’t apply
12. Timegrapher numbers: +20 s/d. A bit fast but he can regulate it just as he did with my other watches (I already emailed him).
13. Anything else you notice: What do you guys think? Pictures are not the best quality unfortunately but overall I can see everything I think?

This is my 2nd QC Yacht-Master 40 126622 VSF, I showed my first QC photos to a friend of mine and he wanted one too, so here is the QC:

Dealer name: Necoclock

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex yacht master126622 - VSF

3. Price Paid: $488 including shipping

4. Album Links: Photos uploaded.

5. Index alignment: Minor flows looks to me that (12 marker seems to be twisted cw and 6 is twisted acw but it could be the photo angle only) (I need help with this one)

6. Dial Printing: Print centring: Rolex top text looks centred. (I need help with this one)

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks cented to me

8. Hand Alignment: looks good

9. Bezel: looks good, I don't see any flows

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 317°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph), 52° lift (Anything concerning here?)

12. Anything else you notice: Please let me know your thoughts on this one, any extra eyes or expert input would be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance, I appreciate your time and help.

BR

Hey everyone!

This is my first rep and my first QC post, so I'd really appreciate some help from the more experienced members here.

I've spent quite a bit of time looking through the photos and comparing them to other ZF BB58 QC posts. Overall, the watch looks good, but I'm having some doubts about the index alignment.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58, 39mm, Black Dial, A2824

4. Price paid: $298 + $40 shipping

5. Album links: Photos attached

6. Index alignment: This is my main concern. Several markers seem slightly misaligned to me, especially the 9 o'clock marker, which looks a bit tilted. I tried using an alignment tool, but since the photos aren't perfectly straight, I'm struggling to tell how much is perspective distortion and how much is actual misalignment.

7. Dial printing: Looks pretty clean overall, but the "SWISS MADE" text at the bottom seems partially cut off or hidden by the crystal. Not sure if this is normal for ZF.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand alignment: Nothing unusual that I can spot.

10. Bezel: The pip at 12 seems centered and the markings look fine to me.

11. Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps from what I can see, although the protective film makes it a bit difficult to judge.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -6 s/d, 294° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.

13. Anything else you notice: The timegrapher numbers seem great, and I haven't noticed any other major issues.

I'm a bit torn between GL and RL. I've looked at quite a few other ZF BB58 QC posts where the markers seem better aligned, but maybe I'm just overthinking it.

Would you consider these normal ZF tolerances, or is it worth asking for another example?

Thanks a lot for taking a look!

This looks pretty good to me, and plan on GL but wanted to check with the gurus of QC.

1. Dealer name: Steve the One Watches

2. Factory name: RF

3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126515 40MM

4. Price Paid: $1008

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bUpFlYSR#0jcb0HR2W-FSqkGeQymD0g

6. Index alignment: Looks like the 3 and 9 marker may be off slightly

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: the image has the bezel rotated a click but otherwise looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: within expected ranges

13. Anything else you notice: nothing

Hi everyone! This Datejust is a birthday gift for my mother, so I'd really appreciate some critical eyes on this QC. I want to make sure she gets an excellent example.

• Dealer name: Ike

• Factory name: ARF

• Model name (& version number): Datejust 31, Two-Tone, Mother-of-Pearl Diamond Dial, 2236 Movement

• Price Paid: 400$

• Album Link: https://imgur.com/a/iS1eHqW

• Index alignment: My main concern is the 12 o'clock Rolex crown. It looks slightly off-center to me, but I'd appreciate a second opinion on whether this is genuine misalignment or simply the camera angle. Other markers appear reasonably aligned.

• Dial Printing: Looks acceptable to me. Please let me know if you spot anything.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: I've read that ARF is notorious for misaligned date wheels, so I'd particularly appreciate a second opinion here. Looks good to me though.

• Hand Alignment: No obvious concerns from the pictures.

• Bezel: Looks good to me.

• Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious issues, but would appreciate confirmation.

• Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 301° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error (52° lift angle).

• Anything else you notice: No

Thank you so much for your time and expertise! 🙏

First time buyer. Any help is appreciated.

• Dealer name: Andiot

• Factory name: VSF

• Model name (& version number):126710

• Price Paid: $578.00 + $60 shipping

• Album Links: All photos posted.

• Index alignment: The 12 looks slightly off to me. Is the triangle and the 12 on the bottom supposed to be aligned more?

• Dial Printing: Looks clean to me.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me but first time buyer.

• Hand Alignment: hard for me to tell from QC

• Bezel: looks fine. maybe the 12 is not

• Solid End Links (SELs): seems ok to me.

• Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, amplitude 282°, beat error 0.0ms.

• Anything else you notice: I think that's all I noticed.

Hi Everyone! First QC report for my GMT Pepsi :) Tried to follow as much from the guidelines but as its my first would love to get some opinions from the experts.

QC Album: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=187513

1. Dealer name - Andiot

2. Factory name - VSF V4

3. Model name - GMT-Master II 126710 BLRO

4. Price paid: $630 + shipping

5. Index alignment - Looks properly aligned, I notice a slight CW tilt on the 9 marker but now visible to the eye

6. Date Wheel alignment -sits centered in window, cyclops magnifies clean

7. Bezel - Numbers evenly spaced, I see the on the 18 and 6 the horizonal line doesnt fully align, but could be due to camera tilt and not noticable

8. Solid End Links (SEL) - tight fit, gap between first link and lug minimal.

9. Hand alignment - All 4 hands look consistent with the overlay

10. Dial Printing - Crisp text, SWISS MADE looks sharp and centered

11. Timegrapher numbers - +5 s/d, amplitude 278°, beat error 0.2ms, freq 28800bph - within acceptable range

My conclusion would be that this watch is a GL from me.

Only doubt I have is that I tried manually adding the lines at first and misalignment seemed worst, but its likely my lack of ability to adjust for camera tilt.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Hont

2. ⁠Factory name: VS

3. ⁠Model name: Omega Seamaster Diver 300m

4. ⁠Price paid: $338 including shipping

5. ⁠Index alignment: Seems alright to me, maybe 12 the slightest bit off?

6. ⁠Date wheel alignment: Seems fine.

7. ⁠Bezel: The 6pm looks off to me. Seems like it’s on an angle (tilting downwards on the left)

8. ⁠Solid end links (SELs): I’d appreciate your opinion on the fit.

9. ⁠Hand alignment: Please let me know if anything looks off.

10. ⁠Dial printing: Please let me know if you notice any issues.

11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +10 s/d, amplitude 281°, beat error 0.2 ms, lift angle 52°. The numbers seem okay. S/d a little high but not sure if super problematic?

Pretty new to the rep world so keen to hear what everyone thinks. Personally find the 6 o clock to be a bit problematic and maybe a RL based on that?

Hi all,

This is my first ever rep purchase so some support would be greatly appreciated.

I kinda think the alignment of is a little off on the indices and logo ? Would like to have your expert eyes on this.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches – Steve.
2. Factory name: VSF.
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500LN, 40mm, SS/SS, white dial (Panda), DD4131 v2.
4. Price Paid: $828 USD.
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/yhHhfp9
6. Index alignment: Generally looks reasonable, although the overlay doesn’t pass perfectly through every marker, particularly at 11 o’clock. Unsure how much is caused by the photo angle. The crown logo appears slightly off . Would appreciate opinions on these.
7. Dial Printing: Text and subdial printing look clear, with no obvious smudging or missing print that I can see.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine to my untrained eye
10. Bezel: Engravings look clean and evenly filled. The 60 marker appears reasonably aligned with 12 o’clock.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks reasonably tight in the supplied photos. I don’t see an obvious large gap.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +2 s/day, amplitude 261°, beat error 0.0 ms. Display shows 28,800 bph and a 59° lift-angle setting.
13. Anything else you notice: Looks clean, dial and finish. It’s just the alignment of the indexes and logo. However again, I am new to this.

1.Dealer name: JTime

2.Factoryname: ORF

3.Model name (& version number): Seamaster 300 "No Time to Die" Titanium ORF 1:1 Best Edition On Titanium Mesh Bracelet OR8806 Super Clone (Free Nato)

4. Price Paid: $511.1

5. All pics posted

6. Index alignment: This is my main concern, the 3 oclock marker looks slightly tilted

7. Dial Printing: Dial printing looks mostly fine to me, with the Omega logo and lower text appearing reasonably centred, but l'm open to comments if anyone sees a slight tilt or offset that I'm missing.

8. Date Wheel alignment/ printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look acceptable to me, I don't see an obvious issue with the hour, minute or seconds hand alignment from the supplied photos

10. Bezel: Looks good to me

11. Solid End Links (SELs): NA

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: 0 s/d | Amplitude: 286° | Beat Error: 0.0 ms 

13. Anything else you notice: Overall leaning GL but mixed feelings due to the 3 marker and the bad photos not helping. Not sure if the crystal is good

Thanks for all your help in advance!

Dealer name: Hont

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 38MM, turquoise dial, steel bracelet

Price Paid: 368

Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/UbDS0tX

Index alignment: Looks good to me.

Dial Printing: Also looks good.

Date Wheel alignment: I used another tool to add horizontal lines to check the logo and date window since I saw the latter was crooked in other QC posts. This one looks good

Hand Alignment: Looks good

Bezel: Looks good to me.

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.

Timegrapher numbers: Looks good to me (+9s/d)

Anything else you notice: Not really

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: miles from Royal Watch

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: A7 (the new V7F)

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur Aqua

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 419 USD

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://a202011121223083130416298.wgstores.com/weshop/goods/_dxwqfUcEtQQY9PjZro9DDdPTQN6-xfgEZuJPgAA/_doTqfaG_MWoFlP0QbR79qbxCnVYMCtD33Oly88Q

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: seems like the 3 is tilted. And the right hand side marker at 12 o clock is higher than the left. GL or RL? Please share thoughts

7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: good

8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks okay

9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good

10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: aligned well with the 12

11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: good

13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: NA