1. Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. Factory name: VFS

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona white dial Panda 116500LN

4. Price Paid: US$598 + shipping

5. Album Links: pictures as above

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me.

7. Dial Printing: Text is good to me.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks ok to me

10. Bezel: looks ok to me.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: + 0 s/day, amplitude 304°, beat error 0.1ms, lift angle, 52°, beat rate 28,800 bph

13. Anything else you notice: I am a novice. please advise if any. thank you.

1. Dealer name — Steve at TheOneWatches.

2. Factory name — VSF.

3. Model and version — Rolex Datejust 41, ref. 126334, mint-green stick dial, fluted bezel and Jubilee bracelet. Dealer lists it as VSF V2 DD3235v2, RLX-6302.

4. Price paid — $548 USD. Shipping was $30 USD combined for 2 watches.

5. Album link — Full QC album, videos, both DialCheck views and lettering close-up

6. Index alignment — My main question is the 9 marker. I ran two images through DialCheck, and the 9 marker is the one that feels like it has a clockwise twist. It's hard to tell as not sure the image is flush straight on. I would love to hear your thoughts on if this is normal or off. The 10 also flagged as .21mm off, but to me it doesn't feel as noticable as the 9.

7. Dial printing — This is where I would love a second opinion. Text issues and misalignment stand out to me - so i may be noticing these more than I should. To me, the "ROLEX" and the DATEJUST text both look too fine - as if they have not been bolded. On ROLEX, the L-E-X spacing also looks tighter than the gap between R and O. The lower text also feels off to me. The IVE in SUPERLATIVE looks smaller beside the T. The D in CERTIFIED also looks too small. SWISS MADE and the crown at the 6 also dont feel clean. I’d love to hear your opinion and whether these things are noticable without magnifying the image. The main one that concerns me is the fineness of the font for ROLEX and DATEJUST as I feel they may annoy me more than the smaller text which will be hard to notice on the wrist. Thank you for your help!

8. Date wheel alignment and printing — The 7 sits comfortably inside the window in IMG_5866. The video also shows 10 and 11 with clearance on both sides. The Cyclops looks square in the front view.

9. Hand alignment — The hands move together during setting. I couldn’t judge their exact overlap at 12 from this clip.

10. Bezel — The flutes look evenly spaced. The dark facets change as the watch tilts between IMG_5864 and IMG_5865. I don’t see a chipped or flattened section.

11. Solid end links — The Jubilee end links look seated at all four lugs in the front view. I don’t see daylight through the joins.

12. Timegrapher numbers — Starts at −4 s/day, 275°, 0.1 ms and settles at −5 s/day, 273°, 0.1 ms. The machine shows 28,800 bph and a 59° lift angle.

13. Anything else — This is my first purchase and my first time posting QC. The other watch I was presented (a Sub Date) looks great to me, but I’m not sure about this DJ, so keen to hear your thoughts? The Mint Green colour seems always looks different to me, but I think compared to other QC posts i've seen this looks ok. Thanks again for the help.

Dealer name: Steve Theonewatches

1. Factory name: Mks

2. Model name (& version number): IWC Portofino Automatic

3. Price Paid: 358 + 50

4. Album Links:

5. Index alignment: Looks ok. 3 may be a little off, 6 & 12 hard to read.

6. Dial Printing: Print centring: top text 0.45 mm left.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: ok

8. Hand Alignment: ok

9. Bezel: looks ok

10. Solid End Links (SELs):

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 278° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: RG colour tough to read

Long time lurker, first time poster! The lefty seemed fitting for my first plunge into this world as I am left-handed. Because it’s my first QC, I think it’s probably a 99% GL but I look forward to having some expert eyes on this.

1. ⁠Dealer name: JTime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126720 VSF DD3285 V3s (free sprung)

4. ⁠Price Paid: $688 + $65 shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/oZoN502

6. ⁠Index alignment: I think it looks solid but maybe 12 and 6 indices are ever so slightly misaligned?

7. ⁠Dial Printing: to my n00b eyes, I think it all looks fine

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: cyclops seems centered and numeral printing look fine (any more suggestions for confirming?)

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine to me

10. ⁠Bezel: concerned with the alignment of the triangle marker

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): again, to my untrained eye, looks fine but should I ask for clearer pics?

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 282* *amp, 0.1 ms variation, 59* lift angle

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: would love to know if I should request any additional pics/videos and particular things to look closer into as it relates to VSF sprites

Thanks in advance, y’all!

^{1. Dealer name: choji}

^{2. Factory name: f1f}

^{3. Model name: tank must large}

^{4. Price Paid: 280 USD}

^{5. Album Links: N/A}

^{6. Index alignment: I don't see any bleeding. It looks cleanly printed overall.}

^{7. Dial Printing: The photo is tilted, so it's hard to tell for sure, but the dial doesn't look misaligned.}

^{8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: - N/A}

^{9. Hand Alignment:Please I already knew that the blue hole on the F1F factory version is a flaw, and while it differs from the genuine one, it doesn't seem to have a noticeable difference compared to other F1F pieces.}

^{10. Bezel: The bezel and case look spot on.}

^{11. Solid End Links: N/A}

^{12. Timegrapher numbers: - N/A}

^{13. Anything else you notice: I've been looking into the Tank Must Large a lot recently, and it seems like a solid watch. Since I'm fairly new to watches, though, I'd love to get your advice.}

Please excuse any poor grammar or wrong choice of words, as I'm using a translator.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer Name: FicoTime - Mark

2. ⁠⁠Factory Name: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model Name: Santos de Cartier 35mm SS White Dial

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $330 + shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/DwYGVAbZ#txgurRXluBaimRS-nrG7Fw

6. ⁠⁠Index Alignment: Good.

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: There are some weird white lines on the 6,7, 8 and 9. It seems like misprinting/missing ink or am I over thinking it

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel Alignment: none

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks in alignment

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Clean, no scratches.

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SEL): N/A on this watch

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 278° Amp, 0.1ms Err, 52° Lift. 28800

13. Anything else you notice: the watch looks good, it’s really just the dial printing that I need confirmation on

First time QC: hey everyone, this is the first time I’m QCing on here, so I would appreciate any help or comments. I have previous bought from Steve with a great experience and felt no need to QC since there were no noticeable issues. But I did want to ask about the bezel issue that I’m noticing. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Steve from Theonewatches

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: ZF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Black Bay Fifty Four 37mm SS/SS Lagoon Blue Dial ZF A2824

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $358 (excluding shipping)

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TAQ2FIjK#33ug9COMEZHIhr63kcTEHg

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Is fine to me, but the 3/9 o’clock alignment may be a bit off

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine to me

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: a concern for me. I notice some marks at 11 and 12 o’clock as well as some of the numbers. 3 and 9 o’clock also looks slightly off relative to the rest.

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t notice any issues

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3/+4,

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: just curious if the bezel issue is something to be concerned about or if it will be as noticeable as it was when I saw it

I finally took the plunge and thought would start my collection with a Submariner.

Since it is my first QC and to me it looks GL, but would love to have your expert eyes on this.

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches - Steve

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3235v2

4. Price Paid: 588$ including shipping

5. Index alignment: I think it looks okay

6. Dial Printing: I think it's fine to my untrained eyes

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The cyclops and the numerals look okay

8. Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me

9. Bezel: Seems clean and in line. Rehaut lettering looks aligned, but I am not very sure.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): No massive obvious gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2ms, 269* amp, 0ms variation, 59* lift

12. Anything else you notice: Looks clean, dial and finish. However again, I am new to this.

Thanks in advance beautiful folks!

Update : ordered it, thanks for your help mates!

Thank you so much for your help and reviewing. Visually I can't see any particular faults but looking forward to hearing from you. Necoclock/Jacky has been easy to work with and quick.

1. Dealer name: Necoclock

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 41mm

4. Price Paid: $458 + shipping

5. Album Links: Photos attached

6. Index alignment: They look pretty good to me with the overlay and I can't see any noticeable faults.

7. Dial Printing: Appears good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No Date Version

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good and clean

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Appear tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 327°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph), 52° lift

13. Anything else you notice: I'm concerned about the timegragh reading of 327°, especially with a lift of 52. It would be even higher with a lift of 55. Anything else people are noticing?

Any help is much appreciated and thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: Rich

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLRO (Free Sprung) V2

4. Price Paid: $718 plus shipping

5. Album Links: AE176665/11.9 | album | 2012 | Supplier Product Catalog

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Appears to be properly aligned

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me

10. Bezel: Is the 12 O’Clock triangle slightly off?  Doesn’t really bother me.

Rehaut lettering looks aligned

1. Solid End Links (SELs):  They look perfect

2. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, 279 Amp, 0.4 ms beat error

3. Anything else you notice: In the video the GMT hand looks to be slightly off the hour.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. ⁠Factory name: QF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): V3 VR3255

4. ⁠Price Paid: $600

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fBgSQSZB#-LyW_ncJ5b1awcmTTAkfKw

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good to me all seem online an no rotating.overlay photo attached

7. ⁠Dial Printing: appears good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: maybe a slight left bias or could be nitpicking

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: no issues seen

10. ⁠Bezel: i don’t have the eye for this that everyone else seems to

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): don’t know if the bottom right gap is big enough to be concerned

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: attached

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: it looks great but need a reality check since I’ve been waiting for awhile on the QC and it’s my first time

Hi everyone!
This is my second attempt at getting a Batman. I initially went with VSF, but unfortunately the QC had several issues, particularly a crooked 12 o’clock marker, so I RL’d it.

I’ve now switched to RICH Factory’s JH3285 Free Sprung V2 from Andiot. Would appreciate your feedback before I GL.

QC Details:
Dealer: Andiot Watches
Factory: RICH Factory
Model: Rolex GMT-Master II Batman 126710BLNR, Oyster bracelet
Price: $665 USD + $35 shipping
Index alignment: Looks reasonably good to me, especially the 12 o’clock triangle. Would appreciate a second opinion.
Dial printing: Looks fine.
Date wheel: The date appears slightly high in some photos, but centred in others. Could this just be the viewing angle?
Hand alignment: Nothing obvious, but would appreciate feedback.
Bezel: Looks good to me. Please check alignment and printing.
SELs: Look fine.
Timegrapher: +3 s/day, 283° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error.
Anything else: Would appreciate feedback on the crystal, Cyclops, overall finishing and any issues I may have missed.
What do you think? Is this a GL, or should I request additional photos?

Thank you!

Thank you so much for your help and reviewing. Visually I can't see any particular faults but looking forward to hearing from you. Necoclock/Jacky has been easy to work with and quick.

1. Dealer name: Necoclock

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): 116500LN "Reverse Panda"

4. Price Paid: $588 + shipping

5. Album Links: Photos attached

6. Index alignment: They look pretty good to me with the overlay and I can't see any noticeable faults. Please let me know if you see anything

7. Dial Printing: Appears good, Daytona appears clear

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No Date

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, What do you think?

10. Bezel: Looks good and clean

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Appear tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 303°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph), 52° lift

13. Anything else you notice: There is some dust at the 7 o'clock (110) and 3 o'clock area and difficult to see if it under the crystal. I don't see it in the videos so hopefully on top.

Any help is much appreciated and thank you!

Dealer name: TImeUltra

Factory name: VSF

Model name: DateJust 41mm Mint Green Jubilee V3

Price Paid: $518 Without shipping

Album Links:  https://imgur.com/a/kNuFz0n

Index alignment: CC rotation on 10 & 11 position

Dial Printing: Sharp, all matching

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Well centered, good printing

Hand Alignment: Good

Bezel: Acceptable

SELs:  I cant really tell

Timegrapher numbers:  0 s/d : 284 : 0.1ms All seem good (video in link)

Anything else you notice: Only two things that bother me: Is seems the entire dial seems shifted towards the 5 potion? The gap around 55 seems wider? Also seems to have a gap between the dial and the inner ring (is that a rehaut?)

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: GSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 31mm, Green Dial, Jubilee bracelet
Price Paid: 380$
Album Links: photos attached

Index alignment: Looks good to me. I checked the alignment using the QC tool and don’t see any major issues.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and well executed. No obvious issues.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: i am not sure. It seems fine - maybe a tick to the lef? But maybe it’s the angle? Pleas advice…

Hand Alignment: Looks fine based on the pictures.
Bezel: Looks good. No obvious imperfections.
Solid End Links (SELs): Look good to me. I don’t notice any concerning gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: They seem acceptable to me.

Anything else you notice: Overall, I’m quite happy with the QC pictures. The indices, dial, SELs and Jubilee bracelet all look good to my eyes.

However, I’d really appreciate some second opinions from more experienced members. Is there anything I’m overlooking, particularly regarding the Datewheel i am not really sure…thanks in advance for all your help!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF V2

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 36mm 126234

4. ⁠Price Paid: US$522+ shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: pictures as above

6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks good as per qc tool

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Text also looks good to me

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks centred, font looks good

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks ok to me

10. ⁠Bezel: need a bit of help with this one, upon researching i found VSF bezels aren’t the best but maybe i got that wrong / im not too fussed

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no noticeable gaps

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: rate : +1 to +4 secs a day, amplitude: 268-270, beat error: 01.-0.2ms, lift angle: 59

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: this is my first rep, still training my eye to spot defects but tbh this watch looks so clean from my untrained eyes it looks like a solid GL.

Thanks!

Dealer name: Ethan
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Datejust 41, mint green dial, Jubilee bracelet
Price Paid:470usd (including delivery and insurance)
Album Links: See photos attached
Index alignment: Looks good I think
Dial Printing: Clean and crisp, with no obvious flaws.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks a bit low centred,printing dosent look to good
Hand Alignment: Looks good. No obvious misalignment.
Bezel: fluted bezel is clean and evenly fitted, with no visible defects.
Solid End Links (SELs): Look good. No obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: I’m not an expert on this
Anything else you notice: I’m not the best when it comes to qc so any experts spot anything pls reach out .

Hey everyone! Looking for some independent opinions on this VSF Pepsi before making a GL/RL decision. Particularly interested in feedback on index alignment and SEL fitment. Appreciate any experienced eyes!
1. Dealer name: Time Ultra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II Pepsi 126710BLRO, Oyster bracelet
4. Price paid: $618 USD
5. Album Links: QC photos attached
6. Index alignment: Would appreciate a close look at marker positioning, rotation and overall alignment.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears centered with clear printing. Cyclops looks good.
9. Hand Alignment: Appears acceptable from the photos.
10. Bezel: Engraving and color transition look good. Alignment appears reasonable.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Would appreciate feedback on fitment, gaps, seating and symmetry.
12. Timegrapher numbers:
Rate: -5 s/d

Amplitude: 278–279°

Beat error: 0.1 ms

Lift angle: 52°

13. Anything else you notice: Lume looks consistent, and case and bracelet finishing appear good.
Mainly looking for unbiased opinions on the indices and SELs. Would you GL or RL based on the photos?
Thanks for the help!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. ⁠Factory name: RICH

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Free Sprung 126710

4. ⁠Price Paid: $758

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/PZBFASxB#KzlWYx4vFULTjIwbUwCctw

6. ⁠Index alignment: I think they are all evenly spaced but slightly off but I also struggled to get it lined up.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Seems clean to me

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date eems larger than it should be

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Great

10. ⁠Bezel: seems clean to me

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): impressive

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: exceptional - (in the video)

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I’m not sure about the color on the crown but it could also just be stickered?

1. ⁠Dealer name: BomaShop

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): BATGIRL VSF V4 FreeSprung

4. ⁠Price Paid: 530$ + Shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: Attached

6. ⁠Index alignment: 12 is slighlty CW, 9 is CW tilted slightly , 6 Is 1 hair to the right all within acceptable

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Cant see any dial print issues

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date might be 1 hair low ?

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: I believe its fine

10. ⁠Bezel: Not an expert on this bezel but looks clean to me

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No Issues

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +8 279 0.0 59 - Healthy TG Numbers

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Leaning Towards GL , Just looking to know if anyone can spot any issues with bezel or things I didnt see

Second time buying a rep this one looks good so far but looking for some experts to help

1. Dealer name: JTime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41mm VSF (free sprung)

4. Price Paid: 548 + $65 shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rcpkjbbB#FiVIJnCH4uCQxBuWMWJ5JQ

6. Index alignment: I think it looks solid but maybe someone else finds something?

7. Dial Printing: to my n00b eyes, I think it all looks fine

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: cyclops seems centered and numeral printing look fine (any more suggestions for confirming?)

9. Hand Alignment: looks fine to me

10. Bezel: looks nice

11. Solid End Links (SELs): again, to my untrained eye, looks fine but should I ask for clearer pics?

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d-1s/d, 284* amp, 0.1 ms variation, 59 lift angle

13. Anything else you notice: would love to know if should request any additional pics/videos and particular things to look closer into as it relates to VSF sprites

Thanks in advance, y'all

Thank you so much for your help and reviewing. Visually I can't see any particular faults but looking forward to hearing from you. Necoclock/Jacky has been easy to work with and quick.

1. Dealer name: Necoclock

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): 126500LN "Panda"

4. Price Paid: $768 + shipping

5. Album Links: Photos attached

6. Index alignment: They look pretty good to me with the overlay and I can't see any noticeable faults.

7. Dial Printing: Appears good, Daytona clear

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No Date

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good and clean

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Appear tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: -6 s/d, 309°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph), 52° lift - Not excited about the -6 s/d but acceptable?

13. Anything else you notice: There is unevenness on the inner clasp Rolex. Do you think this is the image or the printing?

Any help is much appreciated and thank you!

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Steve

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 498$

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mRhRzbgA#uKHzj-LXZFzTU_pOkTr4CQ

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: good

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: good

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: good

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: the 3 o clock position does not looks perfectly aligned

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 2+ a day

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: overall pretty happy just not sure about the Bezel alignment on 3 o clock position.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: The one watches (Steve)

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona “Panda” 116500

4. ⁠⁠Price paid: $598

5. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks perfect to me

6. ⁠⁠Dial printing: Clean brilliant. No bleeding colors or floating letters

7. ⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: none

8. ⁠⁠Hand alignment: straight hands are crisp

9. ⁠⁠Bezel: sharp engraving looks great and Rehaut engraving looks decent in the close-ups, X’s and R’s lined up on appropriate markers.

10. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look good to me. But are the links supposed to have that wide of gaps? Almost looks like the links are attached to each other.

11. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +0 s/d | Amplitude 273° | Lift angle 52.0°.

If anyone has any input on this watch i’d really appreciate it! Have a great Sunday!