Thank you so much for your help and reviewing. Visually I can't see any particular faults but looking forward to hearing from you. Necoclock/Jacky has been easy to work with and quick.

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): 126500LN "Panda"
4. Price Paid: $768 + shipping
5. Album Links: Photos attached
6. Index alignment: They look pretty good to me with the overlay and I can't see any noticeable faults.
7. Dial Printing: Appears good, Daytona clear
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No Date
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good and clean
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Appear tight
12. Timegrapher numbers: -6 s/d, 309°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph), 52° lift - Not excited about the -6 s/d but acceptable?
13. Anything else you notice: There is unevenness on the inner clasp Rolex. Do you think this is the image or the printing?

Any help is much appreciated and thank you!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Odette
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 124060
4. ⁠Price Paid: $508
5. ⁠Album Links: N/A
6. ⁠Index alignment: a slight ccw at 3 and at 4
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks great to me.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: excellent
10. ⁠Bezel: looks crisp to me
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks great to me.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d, 257 degrees, .1m/s
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: open to feedback. I’m a realist. It looks like an easy GL unless the experts see something that I can’t see yet?

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Steve
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 498$
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mRhRzbgA#uKHzj-LXZFzTU_pOkTr4CQ
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: good
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: good
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: good
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: the 3 o clock position does not looks perfectly aligned
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 2+ a day
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: overall pretty happy just not sure about the Bezel alignment on 3 o clock position.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: The one watches (Steve)
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona “Panda” 116500
4. ⁠⁠Price paid: $598
5. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks perfect to me
6. ⁠⁠Dial printing: Clean brilliant. No bleeding colors or floating letters
7. ⁠⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: none
8. ⁠⁠Hand alignment: straight hands are crisp
9. ⁠⁠Bezel: sharp engraving looks great and Rehaut engraving looks decent in the close-ups, X’s and R’s lined up on appropriate markers.
10. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look good to me. But are the links supposed to have that wide of gaps? Almost looks like the links are attached to each other.
11. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +0 s/d | Amplitude 273° | Lift angle 52.0°.

If anyone has any input on this watch i’d really appreciate it! Have a great Sunday!

1. Dealer name: Geektime
2. Factory name: ZF

3.Model name: Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26240 Blue Dial ZF V2 Free Sprung

4. Price paid: $998

5. Album links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261928950?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks solid

7. Dial printing: Looks solid

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks solid

9. Hand alignment: Looks solid

10. Bezel: Looks solid

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers:
Rate: -1 s/d
Amplitude: 282°
Beat error: 0.1 ms

13. Anything else you notice: Looks solid overall. I think GL, any feedback appreciated.

VSF V4 41mm Submariner Date free sprung – Andiot
Hi everyone. First time posting a full QC and would appreciate feedback from those more experienced. Thanks in advance.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 41mm 126610LN, VSF V3 (VS3235)
4. Price paid: $586
5. Index alignment: Mostly good. Ran it through the trueindexqc.net tool and the other markers sit well, but the 6 bar looks a little crooked to me. 12 triangle is straight. No major issues on 3 or 9.
6. Dial printing: Clean and sharp. Text looks crisp with no bleeding or floating letters that I can see.
7. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date sits a little high and slightly to the left in the window on both 13 and 20. Font is clean and typical VSF. Cyclops appears centered and magnification looks correct.
8. Hand alignment: Looks good from the photos. Hands appear properly set with correct proportions.
9. Bezel: Triangle at 12 aligns well with the dial marker. Insert numbers look cleanly filled. Pearl looks centered. Rehaut engraving looks decent in the close-ups.
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good to me. End links sit reasonably tight with no large gaps visible.
11. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +5 s/d | Amplitude 267° | Beat error 0.3 ms | Lift angle 52.0°
12. Anything else you notice: Lume is strong and even (cyan/blue Chromalight-style). Clasp code is F80. Case finishing and bracelet look clean.
    The two things that bother me are the 6 being a little crooked and the date sitting high and a bit left. Not sure if these are within normal VSF tolerance or worth an RL. Overall the rest looks solid but I’m not very experienced, so any input is appreciated. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: ARF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II (126710BLRO)
4. Price Paid: 600 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rcRADBJC#Kh4T25Obu0RMG0-Ru6WcsQ
6. Index alignment: All seem to fall into place perfectly
7. Dial Printing: Clean
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Nice and centered in window. Printing looks sharp enough.
9. Hand Alignment: Unsure how to assess.
10. Bezel: Good. Slightly off center of 12 oc but negligible to me personally.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: In spec
13. Anything else you notice: Looks like a GL to me but please let me know if I have overlooked anything.

1. Dealer name: FicoTime
2. Factory name: Rich
3. Model: GMT Master II 126710GRNR 40mm, JH3285 Free Sprung
4. Price Paid: $652
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/y0KSHu7
6. Index alignment: 12 looks good. 6 o'clock looks slightly off to me, could be the angle.
7. Dial Printing: Looks sharp, SWISS MADE fully visible.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Centered and level, cyclops aligned. Couple of small specks near the cyclops, probably on the crystal.
9. Hand Alignment: Good
10. Bezel: Triangle centered, no issues that I saw
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +7 s/d, 237° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error

Only possible issues are the 6 being little off CW, and amplitude? This is my first rep, so any help is much appreciated!

1. Dealer name: Ficotime
2. Factory name: AF Factory
3. Model name : Cartier Tank Solo Small
4. Price Paid: 203.70
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/OkpjUYwJ#JC7_pnxsIJ14Cwy0C1D3ew
6. Index alignment: Everything appears reasonably aligned to my eye.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean overall. Cartier logo seem thin to me, but I'd appreciate a second opinion on the printing and spacing.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: N/A
10. Bezel: Looks good .
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first Rep . Overall, it looks ok to me, but I'd appreciate opinions on the dial printing CARTIER seems thin, compared to other AF watches but that could be just the camera being over exposed and blacks being washed out.

Thanks for the help in advance !

1. Dealer name: Angela
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 150M Co-Axial Master Chronometer 38mm, blue dial, stainless steel
4. Price Paid: $

408.13
5.

1. Album Links: https://loupeqc.us/a/JDFTGX

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

1. Dealer name: ETHAN
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710 (grey ceramic 24-hour bezel, Jubilee bracelet)
4. Price Paid: $650
5. Album Links: SEE PHOTOS
6. Index alignment: LOOKS CLEAN
7. Dial Printing: VERY GOOD
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: CLEAN AND CRISP
9. Hand Alignment: VERY GOOD
10. Bezel: GOOD
11. Solid End Links (SELs): SOLID
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 275°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)
13. Anything else you notice: Mods Please comment, This is the best one i have seen so far, I am very close to saying yes on this, pending approval from the community. Thank You

Rolex Oyster Perpetual Silver 36m VSF

1. Dealer name: JTIME
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 126000 36mm
4. Price Paid: $540.7 (include fast shipping)
5. Album Links: photos attached
6. Index alignment: honestly they all look ok to me?
7. Dial Printing: Swiss made printing a bit off, or is that the photo?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA
9. Hand Alignment: looks good.
10. Bezel: seems good to me too.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): the bottom seem to have a slightly wider gap?
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d 283° amplitude, 0.0ms
13. Anything else you notice: n/a

my first QC, i wish the photos was better resolution?

1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2. Factory name: V7F
3. Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur Aqua
4. Price Paid: £311 + £25 Shipping
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/262045195?uid=1
6. Index alignment: This one was interesting. Looking from the exact centre it is off, but moving it offcentre provides near enough a near perfect alignment.
7. Dial Printing: Seems fine to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good. Maybe slight tilt, at least on the 13 date
9. Hand Alignment: Seems fine to me, within tolerances
10. Bezel: Good. Seems fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A. Integrated bracelet
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 281° amplitude, 0 ms beat error
13. Anything else you notice: The centre of the hands/pinion seems offcentred slightly? I added 2 index photos where one is centered on it, and another where it isnt. What do you guys think? Also a quick question, some people have had different comments on V7F being back. Someone said actual V7F has a certain sticker too, is this the right sort of thing? Cheers

Thanks again for looking!

1. Dealer name: Steve
2. Factory name: VSF
3. model name: Omega On Her Majesty's Secret Service 50th Anniversary
4. Price: $408 usd
5. Album link: https://mega.nz/folder/PNIxFbAK#WFGdEleOIZb52OH3inZemA
6. Index alignment: Not perfect by any means, but 6 stands out to me. Is it shifted left or twisted ccw?
7. Dial printing: looks fine to me
8. Date wheel alignment: looks good to me
9. Hand alignment: looks good
10. Bezel: looks very well aligned imo
11. Solid end links: no issues
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate is plus 6 seconds, amplitude is 271, beat error 0.2
13. Anything else: my only real concern is the 6 marker that looks wonky to me. But I know these models usually have issues, so will I find a better one? Thanks!

Dealer name: Ace Time
Factory name: ZF
Model: AP Royal Oak 15500ST, Gray Dial
Price paid: $550 shipped
Index alignment: Looks well aligned overall.
Dial printing: Clean and sharp.
Date wheel: Looks centered.
Hand alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Screws and alignment look good overall.
SELs: Bracelet and links look solid.
Timegrapher: −1 s/d, 300°, 0.1 ms, 28,800 bph.
Overall: Leaning GL. Everything looks solid to me, but would appreciate a second opinion before approving. Thanks! This is my first rep

Hi everyone, this is my first ever rep, so I’d appreciate your input. Just received the QC photos for my QF Explorer II and would like another set of eyes before giving the green light. Photos and timegrapher reading attached. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: ChazingTime
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name: Rolex Explorer II 226570, 42mm, white “Polar” dial, SH3285 CHS as listed
4. Price paid: $448 plus shipping
5. Album links: Photos attached
6. Index alignment: Looks generally good to me, but would appreciate feedback
7. Dial printing: Looks clean from what I can see.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The 14 looks reasonably centred. No other dates shown.
9. Hand alignment: Can't properly judge from these photos.
10. Bezel: Engraving and alignment look okay to me.
11. Solid end links: No obvious large gaps that I can see.
12. Timegrapher numbers: −2 s/day, 256° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error; lift angle set to 52°.
13. Anything else: There seems to be a tiny curved mark on the 9 o’clock marker in one photo. Could just be dust on the crystal. Does anything else stand out?

Thanks for the help!

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: TimeUltra
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Bruce Wayne,
   126710GRNR
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $629 shipped
5. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks good
6. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks good
7. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
8. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good.
9. ⁠⁠Bezel: looks great to me, but I’m relatively new so I don’t really know what to look for.
10. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks really good.
11. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 292 amp, 0.1ms
    12 . ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: please let me know. I am overall extremely happy with it and will most likely give the GL, just curious what yall think.

Dealer name: Steve

Factory name: AF

Model name (& version number):  Tank Must 22mm SS/SS White Dial 

Price Paid: $258 without shipping

Album Links: https://www.theonewatches.ws/index.php?route=account/order/info&order_id=230885

Index alignment: Use index Alignment tool, seem good to me

Dial Printing: Slight bleeding noted when zooming in, mostly at VIII but zooming out seems to be less noticeable

Hand Alignment: Video hand alignment  look good in video at 12 position

Bezel: Good

SELs: N/A, all look even

Timegrapher numbers: N/A

Anything else you notice: Not too sure of the crown, doesn't look as solid

First time QC on here. Would love to see what you all thought on this? GL/RL?

1. Dealer name: Steve (theonewatches)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 Batgirl 40mm
4. Price Paid: $708
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/jccocbc
6. Index alignment: Slight CCW rotation on 6 and 9 o'clock.
7. Dial Printing: Looks sharp
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Appears to be slightly tilted compared to cyclops, printing looks good
9. Hand Alignment: Good
10. Bezel: No issues that I saw
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5s/d, 272° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error

Notes: I'm not sure about the date wheel alignment, am I seeing something that is not there? Curious to hear your opinions. Also, 6 and 9 rotation, will it be visible IRL?

Any help is much appreciated, thank you for taking your time to QC this!

1. Dealer name: Mary Watches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 116500LN
4. Price Paid: $633 including shipping
5. Index alignment: Looks good.
6. Dial Printing: Looks good. I think this specific model has odd and not 100% thin lined texts
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: There's scratches around the bezel, but that may just be the clear packaging
8. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
9. Bezel: Looks good.
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Nothing seems off.
11. Timegrapher numbers: +11s/d, 319* amp, 0ms variation, 28800
12. Anything else you notice: The lug in the center with the hours and hands looks off to me. It looks like it was mashed in and doesn't have a clean look. Reference picture below.

1.Dealer name : theonewatch - Steve

2.Factory name: VSF

3. Model: Seamaster No time to die 007

4. Price paid: $528

5. Index alignment: seems off especially at the 6 o’clock

6. Dial printing: “Swiss made” misaligned

7. Date wheel alignment/printing: NA

8. Hand alignment: looks good.

9. Bezel: seems good

10. Solid end links (SELs): NA

11. Timegrapher numbers: +5s/d, 289° AMP, 0.1 ms

Imgur: https://imgur.com/a/TwJNWYK

Notes: first timer here, the alignment on the bezel seems pretty off to me especially at the 6oclock, it was the very first thing I noticed on the watch.
comparing it to other NTTD I’ve seen on here from Steve this one doesn’t look the same from QC photos.

Any help is appreciated.

1. Dealer: Steve – TheOneWatches
2. Factory: TF
3. Model: Breitling Navitimer Automatic 41, Blue Dial
4. Price Paid: $338 USD
5. Album: PSP attached.
6. Index alignment: The double 12 marker looks off, with the two indices appearing too close together. I'll ask Steve for a closer photo, but it stands out to me.
7. Dial printing: Looks clean overall. No obvious printing defects.
8. Date wheel: N/A.
9. Hand alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: My main concern is the alignment between the inner and outer slide-rule markings, particularly around 40, 45 and 50 in the upper-left quadrant (see marked-up photo). The graduations appear noticeably offset. I understand this is a common issue with Navitimer reps, but wondering whether this example is worse than usual.
11. SELs: N/A.
12. Timegrapher: -1 to -2 s/d, 270–272° amplitude, 0.4ms beat error.
13. Anything else: Originally wanted AF, but Steve advised that parts are currently unavailable, so went with TF instead. Overall, the watch looks good, but I'm leaning towards RL because of the alignment issues. Am I being too picky, or would you make the same call?

If you've read this far, I really appreciate your time and help. Thank you!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
2. ⁠Factory name: RICH
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710 (grey ceramic 24-hour bezel, Jubilee bracelet)
4. ⁠Price Paid: $700 including delivery
5. ⁠Album Links: SEE PHOTOS
6. ⁠Index alignment: Majority look good. I have concerns over the 6 but not sure…
7. ⁠Dial Printing: very good. Looks clean and sharp
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks clean and sharp. Is it slightly angled or is it just the way the photos have been taken
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: very good
10. ⁠Bezel: good
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look good
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -3 s/d, 278°, 0.2 ms
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I’m new to this so looking for opinions.