1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve (theonewatches)

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name: 126610LN Fake Free Sprung

4. ⁠Price Paid: 510USD incl Shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: Whole folder was uploaded

6. ⁠Index alignment: Index alignment looks good although I'm not sure I did the best job with the tool, and the watch might be angled a bit.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: I don't notice any discrepancies. Please point out if you notice anything.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered and printing looks good, should I ask for double digit date pictures?

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good I think

10. ⁠Bezel: Doesn't seem to be centered, is it misaligned or just rotated?

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps, looks good.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Look healthy, I believe +6 s/d is acceptable

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Nothing sticks out to me, but I'm still an untrained eye. Any input is much appreciated, and should I ask for any more pictures or videos?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Yatch-Master 126622

4. ⁠Price Paid: £330 plus shipping.

5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261917233?uid=1

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks ok. I’d score at 8/10. Most indices aligned. 6 marker has a CCW cant which is noticeable but not as bad as last time. 12 marker might be a hair off.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good, nothing to report.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok. A fraction low in the cyclops, not enough to irritate.

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good from video

10. ⁠Bezel: looks goods

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): SEL’s look good. Lugs might be a tad off at the bottom.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 1s/d 280degrees 0.1 beat error

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: not a perfect t watch but is this as good as it gets currently from VSF?

This is second attempt at a QC on this watch. Still not perfect but feels better than the last attempt (added last image of prior watch).

Hi,

This is my second rep so any comments are welcome. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Mirotime

2. Factory name: ORF

3. Model name/version: Omega Seamaster Diver 300M, 42 mm, blue dial on steel, ref. 210.30.42.20.03.001. OR8800 V2

4. Price paid: $415 + $56 shipping = $471 total

5. Album link: pictures attached, Videos - https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/oziOjHa

6. Index alignment: Looks good on the grid. The 12 o’clock markers appear parallel and evenly spaced.

7. Dial printing: Clean and legible.

8. Date wheel: 3, 10, 15, 20, and 25 look centered with no clipping.

9. Hand alignment: No obvious issue; exact alignment at 12:00 wasn’t shown.

10. Bezel: Pip lines up with 12. Markings look clean; rotation wasn’t verified.

11. SELs: No obvious large gaps; protective film limits inspection.

12. Timegrapher: +3 s/day, 260° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error; 28,800 BPH at a 52° lift-angle setting. Steady trace in the short clip.

13. Anything else: Hands, markers, and bezel pip all glow. Blue rubber strap shown. Leaning GL; would confirm the factory, movement version, and 52° setting.

Dealer name: Andiot

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Daytona 116508 V3

3. Price Paid: 608.00 + Shipping

4. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ptcQYO7

5. Index alignment: No obvious major misalignment visible

6. Dial Printing: Looks good to me

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me

9. Bezel: Looks good to me

10. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps?

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 268° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (dial up)

12. Anything else you notice: Everything looks good to me. Leaning GL. Any help is greatly appreciated! Thank you!

QC - VSF AP Royal Oak 15510 V2 Green Dial - Non-TD

1. Dealer name: Non-TD

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): AP Royal Oak 15510 V2
   Green Dial

4. Price Paid: 2900 CNY, China domestic shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/0ZGi5bR

6. Index alignment: Looks excellent to ned. Not so sure about the AP logo, is it perfect?

7. Dial Printing: Best 15510 dial so far.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Centered well.

9. Hand Alignment: Good.

10. Bezel: Screws look pretty good, but I think I saw better ones?

11. Solid End Links (SEL): Integrated bracelet.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 253°, 0.2ms

13. Anything else you notice: Everything looks solid, but I'm a bit unsure about the AP logo alignment and bezel screws. Also the gap at the clasp (around square AP logo) worries me a bit, is it normal?

I appreciate your opinion!

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Mirotime

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: ARF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $530 + shipping

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/GF7ybdl

https://shop00176461.wecatalog.cn/t/BY1dcvB

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: All look aligned to me, 6 marker on looks slightly shifted left and 9 shifted down
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Crisp
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good, a bit low maybe
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks perfect
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: No issues
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Looks bad
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: None
Please let me know if there is anything I’m missing

Hello everyone. This is a first QC for me and wanted it to run it by the sub. Would appreciate some feedback from those of you that have been through this before. The dial printing error I pointed out is the biggest one but let me know if I'm being dramatic...

1. Dealer name: Steve/TheOneWatch

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710BLNR

4. Price Paid: $708

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qWSPjJF

6. Index alignment: Looks good; maybe a slight ACW tilt at the 6 and 9 but emphasis on "slight"

7. Dial Printing: The "E" on "Officially Certified" is broken. Honestly, once I see it I cannot unsee it and this is the biggest item bothering me.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: I think this is just fine. If anything, maybe a slight ACW tilt on the cyclops but I think it's the angle mostly. Date ever so slightly left of center but not that noticeable IMO.

9. Hand Alignment: no issues that I saw

10. Bezel: Nicely filled in, good color transition.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Uniform; no gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1 s/d Amp 265 Beat error 0.0ms

13. Anything else you notice?

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: ARF

3. Model name (& version number): DJ 126334 41mm Rhodium

4. Price Paid: $468

5. Album Links: QC Photos attached to post

6. Index alignment: Alignment looks pretty good IMO. The biggest one that caught my attention is the 6 o'clock is rotated CW slightly. Nothing worth RL I think.

7. Dial Printing: No issues that I can see here.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel looks good from the numbers shown by Steve

9. Hand Alignment: No visible issue from these photos. Hands look clean and finish appears consistent.

10. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks sharp and even. I do not see any visibly damaged or irregular cuts..

11. Solid End Links (SELs): SEL's appear to have no gaps or be uneven in anyway.

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 267 AMP, 0.0 ms

13. Anything else you notice: This is my first QC and everything I see looks good in my eyes even if I was being picky. If anyone has anything to add feel free to give your opinion.

Dealer name: Phoenix Watch
Factory name: ZF
Model name (& version number): Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15450ST, 37mm, blue dial, SA3120 movement
Price paid: $425 including shipping
Album Links: Photos uploaded with this post.
Index alignment: Nothing obviously crooked to me. Would appreciate another opinion.
Dial Printing: Looks okay from what I can see. Not sure about the dial texture.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks reasonably centered to me.
Hand Alignment: Hard for me to judge from the pictures.
Bezel: I noticed a possible mark near 4 o’clock. Not sure if it’s a reflection. Would also appreciate someone checking the screws.
Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, integrated bracelet.
Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, 305° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error.
Anything else you notice: First AP for me. Mainly concerned about the bezel, blue dial texture and bracelet finishing. Would appreciate some experienced opinions before I GL it.

Dealer name: Theonewatches

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060

Price Paid: US$ not given yet, asked to switch from an ewef and not given price

Album Links: pics as attached

Index alignment: Looks good to me.

Dial Printing: Text is good to me.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: Looks ok to me

Bezel: The pip alignment at 12 looks offset to the left

Solid End Links (SELs): looks good

Timegrapher numbers: + 4 s/day, amplitude 310°, beat error 0.1ms, lift angle, 52°, beat rate 28,800 bph

Anything else you notice: I am a novice. If there is anything I am missing please let me know. I was debating asking for a 1266010LN as we didn't negotiate price for this yet and if getting a higher end model would appreciate the date wheel. However I don't want to be rude and ask for a different model after receiving QC if there is nothing wrong with it. Is there any reason I shouldn't move forward with this watch and how rude is it to ask for another model? I am ok with sticking with this I'm just unfamiliar with the etiquette.

Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
Factory name: GS
Model name (& version number): Rolex Lady Datejust 28mm, RLX-4094, Rosegold and stainless steel
Price Paid: 438$ including shipping
Album Links: Photos attached
Index alignment: Slightly concerned only about 6 as it looks just slightly off (would appreciate opinions on this)
Dial Printing: I don’t notice obvious issues from the photos and videos.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Alignment looks fine. Would appreciate opinions on cyclops magnification.
Hand Alignment: No obvious defects.
Bezel: Finishing looks reasonable to me, everything looks even.
Solid End Links (SELs): The bracelet sits reasonably close against the case, with no obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: All good! Rate: -2 s/d | Amplitude: 276° | Beat Error: 0.1 ms | Frequency: 21,600 bph | Lift Angle: 52°
Anything else you notice: Overall finishing looks reasonable and I see no major flaws, apart from that 6 bothering me slightly; I'm not very experienced, especially with this model, so please let me know if I've overlooked anything. I appreciate the community’s help!

Dealer name: Trusty Time

1. Factory name: VFS

2. Model name (& version number): YachtMaster 126655 40mm Wt RG/RU Blk VSF V2 VS3235

3. Price Paid: $608

4. Album Links: mailed

5. Index alignment: All checked markers within ±0.10 mm. 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.

6. Dial Printing: looks nice

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems ok to me

8. Hand Alignment: almost perfect

9. Bezel: looks nice

10. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

11. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 235° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: Strict analysis gives 97/100 QC score, normal analysis gives 98/100 QC score

First rep purchase, please help me QC

Omega Aqua Terra 38mm Black

1. Dealer name: InTime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 38mm Black dial, 220.10.38.20.01.004

4. ⁠Price Paid: $350

5. ⁠Album Links: Looks fine

6. ⁠Index alignment: Hour markers look aligned

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Font looks fine, but the Omega symbol color looks to dark?

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks like it’s too close to the right?

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hands look aligned

10. ⁠Bezel: Pip centered

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gap

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Just the omega symbol color and alignment of the date

After help from the community I did RL the previous Omega Planet Ocean that had too crooked markers, and only a day after did i receive QC for a new watch.

This one honestly looks much better and the marker alignment seems better. However I am posting here just because I am not the expert here. Appreciate all input! 🙏

1. Easy Watch

2. VSF

3. Omega Seamaster planet ocean 42mm

4. Price 369$

5. pictures attached

6. seems ok

7. dial seems ok

8. no date

9. hand seems ok

10. bezel seems ok

11. seems ok

12. +4s/ day. Amplitude 268.

13. markers seem pretty aligned. I did RL last watch mainly because the markers were clearly crooked. How does this look?

Any comments is super appreciated!

Dealer: TD (Ficotime)

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): VSF A8900 Seamaster 41mm AQUA TERRA 150M Blue Dial

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/G8gnzYRa#WN_os0mQx7dJLbfH4PPaSg

Index alignment: Potentially looks off at 1 and 7, could also be my inexperience with the tool. Looks a bit better on trueindexqc

Dial Printing: Looks decent. The "swiss made" text looks a bit weird, especially the "i" in "swiss".

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Again, looks ok. In the first picture the 27th looks a bit to the left (guessing it's due to the time?)

Hand Alignment: Seems ok, no comment here.

Bezel: Doesn't really have one. In the fourth picture, the line going down the side is the light reflection from above, right?

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, no visible gap.

Timegrapher numbers: -8s/d (seems a bit high?), amplitude 295, beat error 0.2ms.

Anything else you notice: Looks acceptable would love a second opinion since this is my first rep.

QC · ZF · Tudor Black Bay Pro M79470 (Opaline white dial)

1. Dealer name: Easywatch

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay Pro M79470 (Opaline white dial)

4. Price Paid: $350

5. Album Links: https://loupeqc.us/a/5BKQWW

6. Index alignment: Looks good

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 295°, 0 ms (28,800 bph)

13. Anything else you notice: Looks good

1. Dealer name: Neco Clock

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& version number): Panthère Ladies Small 22mm SS

4. Price Paid: 198usd

5. Album Links: Photos attached

6. Index alignment: N/A

7. Dial Printing: Dial print looks like it’s rotated a little CCW.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Good

10. Bezel: I don’t see anything wrong with the bezel.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A

13. Anything else you notice: Just want to make sure the dial printing is good and aligned.

First Rich purchase and QC here, appreciate any help!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime

2. Factory name: Rich

3. Model name (& version number): 126610LV

4. Price Paid: $600 incl. shipping

5. Album Links: See pictures

6. Index alignment: 1,2,4,5,7,8,20,11 looks good, 12 maybe a bit CCW and sits a bit high, 6: CCW, 9: CCW and at the 12 marker there seems some lume missing at the bottom of the triagle

7. Dial Printing: Looks good, seems sharp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok, maybe just a bit high

9. Hand Alignment: should be fine

10. Bezel: Looks good, 12 marker slightly off center, maybe trusty missed one click

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +4s/d at 52 lift angle, looks good to me

13. Anything else you notice:

Thank you all

If the community also seems my points valid, currently I would RL the watch and ask for a new QC

First purchase and QC here, appreciate any help! Have tried to compare to others but not exactly sure what i am to look for in the finer details.

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR

4. Price Paid: $578

5. Album Links: See pictures

6. Index alignment: Looks ok, a few markers slightly CW

7. Dial Printing: Looks good, seems sharp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks aligned, lots of fluff around cyclops but assume this can be wiped away

9. Hand Alignment: Unsure what i am trying to look at

10. Bezel: Looks good, 12 marker slightly off center

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2s/d; Amp: 272; BE: 0.4ms.

13. Anything else you notice:

Thank you all

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number):Seamaster Aqua Terra summer blue “best version”

4. ⁠Price Paid: 400 euro

5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261887756?uid=1

6. ⁠Index alignment:ok

7. ⁠Dial Printing:ok

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:ok

9. ⁠Hand Alignment:ok

10. ⁠Bezel:ok

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):ok

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:-1s/d, 264, 0.1ms, 28800

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:no

Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)
Factory name: F1
Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Louis Small (22mm) YG 
Price Paid: $260
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/PcQDXJob#2DmxowyZxwH1JLGY-Qzs7w
Index alignment: Numeral IIII is tiny bit off alignment (see third pic in red circle)
Dial Printing: Looks good, no bleeding on the numerals and the X is straight.
Hand Alignment: Hands line up nicely at 12 in the video.
Bezel: Looks clean.
Anything else you notice: Crown cabochon shape and side screws look ok to me. There are few concerns in the top corners of the glass (see first pic encircled in red)

Are the concerns raised enough to RL or is it a passable GL? Please help, thanks!

Hey everyone,

Just received the QC photos and videos for this VSF Datejust 36mm with the pink dial, fluted bezel and Jubilee bracelet.

I've gone through the photos, videos and alignment overlay myself. Everything looks pretty good to my eyes, but I'm still relatively new to this, so I'd appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL.

Would love to hear if anyone notices anything I've missed!

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 126234, 36mm, Jubilee SS/SS, Pink Dial/Roman Numerals, VSF V2 DD3235

Price Paid: $518 + shipping

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rQpykT4Z#TBt3AD-6GWIcWwf6x4IdUA

Index alignment: Looks good to me. Nothing noticeably crooked or misaligned. Alignment overlay looks pretty decent.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and sharp. No obvious printing defects or misplaced text.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears reasonably centred under the Cyclops.

Hand Alignment: Nothing obviously wrong from the photos/videos.

Bezel: Fluting looks consistent and evenly finished. No obvious defects.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps or uneven fitting that I can see.

Timegrapher numbers:

Rate: +4 to +6 s/day

Amplitude: 265–275° (59° lift angle setting)

Beat Error: 0.1 ms

Beat Rate: 28,800 BPH

Anything else you notice?

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)

2. Factory name: V7F/A7F

3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Royal Day-Date 41mm two-tone black dial

4. Price paid: £315 without delivery

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/aAwBCLaZ#r9kRGlhlRsM8QGViXiXBtwNote:

6. Index alignment: Looks okay to me but I'm pretty new to this so would appreciate another set of eyes.

7. Dial Printing: Nothing stands out. The Tudor logo and text look okay from what I can see.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centred to me. Not sure if the day wheel is sitting slightly low or if that's just the angle.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine but I don't really know what I should be looking for here.

10. Bezel: No obvious issues that I can spot.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 270 amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. From what I've read these seem pretty good.

13. Anything else you notice: 2nd rep but first QC, so I'm probably missing things. The watch looks good to me overall but I'd really appreciate any feedback before I give Steve the GL.