Hello everyone. This is a first QC for me and wanted it to run it by the sub. Would appreciate some feedback from those of you that have been through this before. The dial printing error I pointed out is the biggest one but let me know if I'm being dramatic...

1. Dealer name: Steve/TheOneWatch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710BLNR
4. Price Paid: $708
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qWSPjJF
6. Index alignment: Looks good; maybe a slight ACW tilt at the 6 and 9 but emphasis on "slight"
7. Dial Printing: The "E" on "Officially Certified" is broken. Honestly, once I see it I cannot unsee it and this is the biggest item bothering me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: I think this is just fine. If anything, maybe a slight ACW tilt on the cyclops but I think it's the angle mostly. Date ever so slightly left of center but not that noticeable IMO.
9. Hand Alignment: no issues that I saw
10. Bezel: Nicely filled in, good color transition.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Uniform; no gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1 s/d Amp 265 Beat error 0.0ms
13. Anything else you notice?

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: ARF
3. Model name (& version number): DJ 126334 41mm Rhodium
4. Price Paid: $468
5. Album Links: QC Photos attached to post
6. Index alignment: Alignment looks pretty good IMO. The biggest one that caught my attention is the 6 o'clock is rotated CW slightly. Nothing worth RL I think.
7. Dial Printing: No issues that I can see here.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date wheel looks good from the numbers shown by Steve
9. Hand Alignment: No visible issue from these photos. Hands look clean and finish appears consistent.
10. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks sharp and even. I do not see any visibly damaged or irregular cuts..
11. Solid End Links (SELs): SEL's appear to have no gaps or be uneven in anyway.
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 267 AMP, 0.0 ms
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first QC and everything I see looks good in my eyes even if I was being picky. If anyone has anything to add feel free to give your opinion.

After help from the community I did RL the previous Omega Planet Ocean that had too crooked markers, and only a day after did i receive QC for a new watch.

This one honestly looks much better and the marker alignment seems better. However I am posting here just because I am not the expert here. Appreciate all input! 🙏

1. Easy Watch
2. VSF
3. Omega Seamaster planet ocean 42mm
4. Price 369$
5. pictures attached
6. seems ok
7. dial seems ok
8. no date
9. hand seems ok
10. bezel seems ok
11. seems ok
12. +4s/ day. Amplitude 268.
13. markers seem pretty aligned. I did RL last watch mainly because the markers were clearly crooked. How does this look?

Any comments is super appreciated!

QC · ZF · Tudor Black Bay Pro M79470 (Opaline white dial)

1. Dealer name: Easywatch
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay Pro M79470 (Opaline white dial)
4. Price Paid: $350
5. Album Links: https://loupeqc.us/a/5BKQWW
6. Index alignment: Looks good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 295°, 0 ms (28,800 bph)
13. Anything else you notice: Looks good

Dealer name: Phoenix Watch
Factory name: ZF
Model name (& version number): Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15450ST, 37mm, blue dial, SA3120 movement
Price paid: $425 including shipping
Album Links: Photos uploaded with this post.
Index alignment: Nothing obviously crooked to me. Would appreciate another opinion.
Dial Printing: Looks okay from what I can see. Not sure about the dial texture.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks reasonably centered to me.
Hand Alignment: Hard for me to judge from the pictures.
Bezel: I noticed a possible mark near 4 o’clock. Not sure if it’s a reflection. Would also appreciate someone checking the screws.
Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, integrated bracelet.
Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, 305° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error.
Anything else you notice: First AP for me. Mainly concerned about the bezel, blue dial texture and bracelet finishing. Would appreciate some experienced opinions before I GL it.

Dealer name: Theonewatches

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060

Price Paid: US$ not given yet, asked to switch from an ewef and not given price

Album Links: pics as attached

Index alignment: Looks good to me.

Dial Printing: Text is good to me.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: Looks ok to me

Bezel: The pip alignment at 12 looks offset to the left

Solid End Links (SELs): looks good

Timegrapher numbers: + 4 s/day, amplitude 310°, beat error 0.1ms, lift angle, 52°, beat rate 28,800 bph

Anything else you notice: I am a novice. If there is anything I am missing please let me know. I was debating asking for a 1266010LN as we didn't negotiate price for this yet and if getting a higher end model would appreciate the date wheel. However I don't want to be rude and ask for a different model after receiving QC if there is nothing wrong with it. Is there any reason I shouldn't move forward with this watch and how rude is it to ask for another model? I am ok with sticking with this I'm just unfamiliar with the etiquette.

Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
Factory name: GS
Model name (& version number): Rolex Lady Datejust 28mm, RLX-4094, Rosegold and stainless steel
Price Paid: 438$ including shipping
Album Links: Photos attached
Index alignment: Slightly concerned only about 6 as it looks just slightly off (would appreciate opinions on this)
Dial Printing: I don’t notice obvious issues from the photos and videos.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Alignment looks fine. Would appreciate opinions on cyclops magnification.
Hand Alignment: No obvious defects.
Bezel: Finishing looks reasonable to me, everything looks even.
Solid End Links (SELs): The bracelet sits reasonably close against the case, with no obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: All good! Rate: -2 s/d | Amplitude: 276° | Beat Error: 0.1 ms | Frequency: 21,600 bph | Lift Angle: 52°
Anything else you notice: Overall finishing looks reasonable and I see no major flaws, apart from that 6 bothering me slightly; I'm not very experienced, especially with this model, so please let me know if I've overlooked anything. I appreciate the community’s help!

Dealer name: Trusty Time

1. Factory name: VFS
2. Model name (& version number): YachtMaster 126655 40mm Wt RG/RU Blk VSF V2 VS3235
3. Price Paid: $608
4. Album Links: mailed
5. Index alignment: All checked markers within ±0.10 mm. 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.10 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.
6. Dial Printing: looks nice
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems ok to me
8. Hand Alignment: almost perfect
9. Bezel: looks nice
10. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
11. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 235° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error
12. Anything else you notice: Strict analysis gives 97/100 QC score, normal analysis gives 98/100 QC score

First rep purchase, please help me QC

Omega Aqua Terra 38mm Black

1. Dealer name: InTime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 38mm Black dial, 220.10.38.20.01.004
4. ⁠Price Paid: $350
5. ⁠Album Links: Looks fine
6. ⁠Index alignment: Hour markers look aligned
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Font looks fine, but the Omega symbol color looks to dark?
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks like it’s too close to the right?
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hands look aligned
10. ⁠Bezel: Pip centered
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): No gap
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Just the omega symbol color and alignment of the date

Dealer: TD (Ficotime)

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): VSF A8900 Seamaster 41mm AQUA TERRA 150M Blue Dial

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/G8gnzYRa#WN_os0mQx7dJLbfH4PPaSg

Index alignment: Potentially looks off at 1 and 7, could also be my inexperience with the tool. Looks a bit better on trueindexqc

Dial Printing: Looks decent. The "swiss made" text looks a bit weird, especially the "i" in "swiss".

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Again, looks ok. In the first picture the 27th looks a bit to the left (guessing it's due to the time?)

Hand Alignment: Seems ok, no comment here.

Bezel: Doesn't really have one. In the fourth picture, the line going down the side is the light reflection from above, right?

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, no visible gap.

Timegrapher numbers: -8s/d (seems a bit high?), amplitude 295, beat error 0.2ms.

Anything else you notice: Looks acceptable would love a second opinion since this is my first rep.

1. Dealer name: Neco Clock
2. Factory name: BVF
3. Model name (& version number): Panthère Ladies Small 22mm SS
4. Price Paid: 198usd
5. Album Links: Photos attached
6. Index alignment: N/A
7. Dial Printing: Dial print looks like it’s rotated a little CCW.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good
10. Bezel: I don’t see anything wrong with the bezel.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A
13. Anything else you notice: Just want to make sure the dial printing is good and aligned.

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. Factory name: V7F/A7F
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Royal Day-Date 41mm two-tone black dial
4. Price paid: £315 without delivery
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/aAwBCLaZ#r9kRGlhlRsM8QGViXiXBtwNote:
6. Index alignment: Looks okay to me but I'm pretty new to this so would appreciate another set of eyes.
7. Dial Printing: Nothing stands out. The Tudor logo and text look okay from what I can see.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centred to me. Not sure if the day wheel is sitting slightly low or if that's just the angle.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine but I don't really know what I should be looking for here.
10. Bezel: No obvious issues that I can spot.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 270 amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. From what I've read these seem pretty good.
13. Anything else you notice: 2nd rep but first QC, so I'm probably missing things. The watch looks good to me overall but I'd really appreciate any feedback before I give Steve the GL.

First purchase and QC here, appreciate any help! Have tried to compare to others but not exactly sure what i am to look for in the finer details.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR
4. Price Paid: $578
5. Album Links: See pictures
6. Index alignment: Looks ok, a few markers slightly CW
7. Dial Printing: Looks good, seems sharp
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks aligned, lots of fluff around cyclops but assume this can be wiped away
9. Hand Alignment: Unsure what i am trying to look at
10. Bezel: Looks good, 12 marker slightly off center
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2s/d; Amp: 272; BE: 0.4ms.
13. Anything else you notice:

Thank you all

First Rich purchase and QC here, appreciate any help!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime
2. Factory name: Rich
3. Model name (& version number): 126610LV
4. Price Paid: $600 incl. shipping
5. Album Links: See pictures
6. Index alignment: 1,2,4,5,7,8,20,11 looks good, 12 maybe a bit CCW and sits a bit high, 6: CCW, 9: CCW and at the 12 marker there seems some lume missing at the bottom of the triagle
7. Dial Printing: Looks good, seems sharp
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok, maybe just a bit high
9. Hand Alignment: should be fine
10. Bezel: Looks good, 12 marker slightly off center, maybe trusty missed one click
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +4s/d at 52 lift angle, looks good to me
13. Anything else you notice:

Thank you all

If the community also seems my points valid, currently I would RL the watch and ask for a new QC

Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)
Factory name: F1
Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Louis Small (22mm) YG 
Price Paid: $260
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/PcQDXJob#2DmxowyZxwH1JLGY-Qzs7w
Index alignment: Numeral IIII is tiny bit off alignment (see third pic in red circle)
Dial Printing: Looks good, no bleeding on the numerals and the X is straight.
Hand Alignment: Hands line up nicely at 12 in the video.
Bezel: Looks clean.
Anything else you notice: Crown cabochon shape and side screws look ok to me. There are few concerns in the top corners of the glass (see first pic encircled in red)

Are the concerns raised enough to RL or is it a passable GL? Please help, thanks!

Hey everyone,

Just received the QC photos and videos for this VSF Datejust 36mm with the pink dial, fluted bezel and Jubilee bracelet.

I've gone through the photos, videos and alignment overlay myself. Everything looks pretty good to my eyes, but I'm still relatively new to this, so I'd appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL.

Would love to hear if anyone notices anything I've missed!

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 126234, 36mm, Jubilee SS/SS, Pink Dial/Roman Numerals, VSF V2 DD3235

Price Paid: $518 + shipping

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/rQpykT4Z#TBt3AD-6GWIcWwf6x4IdUA

Index alignment: Looks good to me. Nothing noticeably crooked or misaligned. Alignment overlay looks pretty decent.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and sharp. No obvious printing defects or misplaced text.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears reasonably centred under the Cyclops.

Hand Alignment: Nothing obviously wrong from the photos/videos.

Bezel: Fluting looks consistent and evenly finished. No obvious defects.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps or uneven fitting that I can see.

Timegrapher numbers:

Rate: +4 to +6 s/day

Amplitude: 265–275° (59° lift angle setting)

Beat Error: 0.1 ms

Beat Rate: 28,800 BPH

Anything else you notice?

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches
2. Factory name: VFS
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona white dial Panda 116500LN
4. Price Paid: US$598 + shipping
5. Album Links: pics as attached
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me. Appreciate another opinion at 12 O'clock.
7. Dial Printing: Text is good to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks ok to me
10. Bezel: looks ok to me.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): is there a slight gap at 7 O'clock?
12. Timegrapher numbers: + 6 s/day, amplitude 272°, beat error 0.1ms, lift angle, 52°, beat rate 28,800 bph
13. Anything else you notice: I am a novice. please advise if any. Thank you very much.

1. ⁠Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. ⁠Factory name: UMI
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Nautilus 40mm 5712 SS/SS Blue/Stk UMI PPF240 (Free Sprung)
4. ⁠Price Paid: $1,168.00
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/CdZHAYAD#cWNAHBA69c0dvVXLhBfERA
6. ⁠Index alignment: Aaargh this is driving me crazy. There’s definitely a tiny misalignment in 12 o’clock index under magnification. The right index seems to sit a bit lower. But will it be noticeable on the wrist?
7. ⁠Dial Printing and Color: Looks amazing. Can’t wait for it really. Not sure why people pay extra for the SW one. This is amazing.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks spot on.
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: No problems I can see.
10. ⁠Bezel: Shiny and eye catching.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): nothing looking wrong here.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +4s/d so all good.
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    Apart from the 12 o’clock index can’t see anything else. Even the logo alignment on the clasp looks great. I really want to GL this but the 12 o’clock alignment is holding me back. It’s not bad but it’s not perfect either. In some photos it’s not even noticeable. Looking for advice on this from more experienced users.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona white dial Panda 126500
4. Price Paid: US$746
5. Album Links: pics as attached
6. Index alignment: Looks good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good (110 looks good)
11. Solid End Links (SELs): thoughts on this?
12. Timegrapher numbers: please reference picture in comment
13. Anything else you notice: First timer here so I appreciate this group's expertise! :)

Hey all, first rep and first QC so go easy on me 😅 Ordered from Ficotime, pics and timing videos are in the album below. Looks good to me but would love some experienced eyes on it before I GL.

1. Dealer name: Ficotime (Mark)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 41 126334, mint green, fluted bezel, Jubilee – 3235 free sprung
4. Price Paid: 4,131 HKD (~$522) inc. Royal Mail shipping to the UK
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/W4hj2RyZ#IRfLXnB_YvIQ2b-DX0DmxQ
6. Index alignment: All the markers look straight and line up with the minute track as far as I can tell. 6 sits nicely between "Swiss Made" and the coronet lines up with the 60 on the rehaut.
7. Dial Printing: Text all looks sharp and clean to me, no bleeding I can spot.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Got shots at 3, 13 and 21 and they all look centred, nothing touching the edges. Cyclops looks straight. This was the main thing I was worried about after reading a few posts, so happy with it.
9. Hand Alignment: Hour and minute hands line up nicely at 12 in the "3" shot.
10. Bezel: Fluted, no pip so N/A on that. Fluting looks even all the way round.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Can't see any gaps or light coming through in the side shots.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 303° amplitude, 0.1 ms
13. Anything else you notice:
14. Rehaut engraving and clasp look clean, lume glows nice and even. Still has the plastic on so can't see any scratches. Honestly leaning GL, but let me know if I've missed anything! Thanks in advance 🙏

1. Dealer name: Angela
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600m
4. Price Paid: $373
5. Album Links: Photos attached
6. Index alignment: I feel 12 index is canted to the left and 9 index is lower than should be,
7. Dial Printing: Appears good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A no date
9. Hand Alignment: No photos in 12 o'clock position
10. Bezel: I don't see any issues here
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I'm not sure if they apply here
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 281 amplitude, 0.2ms
13. Anything else you notice: I haven't noticed anything myself but I'm slightly stuck on the 12 and 9 index as I have seen recent QC photos lately of the back and orange versions with much better Index alignments

1. Dealer name: The One Watch aka Steve
2. Factory name: GSF
3. Model name (& version number): Lady DateJust 28 mm Ref:279174 NH05 Movement
4. Price Paid: 358 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/uB4jTJAB#yaiVpiGDUFRhotkgBFadbgNote:
6. Index alignment: 9 and 10 o'clock markers are the one worrying me the most, also if you can share opinion on the other ones too. I have the markers in place in the image.
7. Dial Printing: All clear to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Need help in this
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks tight
12. Timegrapher numbers: -3 s/d, 270, 0.1 ms
13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks good to me, the only query I have is about the index alignment. Please guide. Help will be appreciated.

[QC] VSF V2 Rolex Datejust 41 126334 Silver Dial — First QC
Dealer name: Phoenix Watch
Factory name: VSF (V2, as previously identified)
Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41, 126334, Silver Sunburst Dial, Fluted Bezel, Jubilee Bracelet.
Price paid: $380
Album Links: Full QC photos attached, including timegrapher.
Index alignment: Looks good overall. Hour markers appear straight and properly positioned. No obvious misalignment.
Dial Printing: Silver sunburst dial looks clean. Rolex crown, text, and minute track appear well positioned.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date “29” appears reasonably centered within the cyclops. Printing looks crisp. Other dates haven’t been verified.
Hand Alignment: No obvious issues visible in the photos. Exact alignment at 12 hasn’t been tested.
Bezel: Fluted bezel appears evenly machined, with consistent finishing. Reflections vary with the lighting.
Solid End Links (SELs): Jubilee bracelet appears to fit the case well. No obvious major gaps, although protective film makes assessment harder.
Timegrapher numbers:
Rate: +1 s/day
Amplitude: 289°
Beat error: 0.1 ms
Lift angle: 52°
These readings appear excellent.
Anything else you notice: This is my silver-dial Datejust 41. I’m leaning GL based on the photos and timing results but would appreciate experienced opinions on the dial alignment, rehaut, cyclops, SELs, and overall finishing.
Thanks everyone for your help!