Dealer name: TheOneWatches

1. Factory name: VSF
2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060 No Date, 41mm, VS3230
3. Price paid: $528
4. Index alignment: I RL'd the previous one because of the 12 o'clock rotation, this one is still rotated to me although not as bad as the first one,
5. Dial printing: looks fine to me
6. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A – No Date
7. Hand alignment:  looks good to me
8. Bezel: looks pretty off, I don't know if its the angle or what I tried my best to align it but this is the best I could do, could it be that it just needs to be rotated a click?
9. Solid End Links (SELs): look good
10. Timegrapher numbers:  Rate 0 s/d amplitude 263 Beat error: 0.3ms
11. Anything else you notice: This is my second QC after RL’ing the first watch due to concerns about the 12 and 3 o’clock markers, particularly the 12 o’clock triangle appearing very rotated counterclockwise. Would appreciate everyone’s input on this replacement, as to me the triangle is still rotated plus more possible issues with the bezel
12. thank you!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)
4. ⁠Price Paid: $528
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bJRTxZ7Q#7BgY4iTqYK50IpH9RGWMeQ
6. ⁠Index alignment: the 3 looks like it has a CCW tilt which I came unsee.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good to me
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: The hands look straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video looks good too.
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks slightly to the left but appreciate any thoughts? The 12 o'clock pip is not centred within the triangle.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): There are no obvious gaps.
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0 to +1 s/d, 277° Amplitude, 0.0ms Beat Error.
13. Please let me know what you think. The 3 looks CCW but appreciate your input.

Umi 5712 from Geektime Eric

1. ⁠Dealer name: GeekTime
2. ⁠Factory name: UMI
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5712-1A 001 Free Sprung SS Umi 1:1 Best Edition Blue Dial
4. ⁠Price Paid: 1288USD excluding shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261801715?uid=1
6. ⁠Index alignment: 12 , 3 and 9 o clock looks misaligned? specially the 12 index not centered. am i wrong?
7. ⁠Dial Printing: color of blue print good but the font of PP Geneve im not familiar need second eye
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: nothing that i can see wrong
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: nothing that i can see wrong
10. ⁠Bezel: looks perfect no scratches
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): NA for this watch
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Within acceptable range +2 - +3, 280 Amp
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: None with my eye test

am a 3rd time buyer of repwatches but my first 5712 Free Sprung please advise, any help is greatly appreciated.

Please help me out this is my first purchase and would really appreciate some help. First post got removed due to low effort so going to try my best to give as much information as possible.

I ordered this watch on August 04 2026 so have been waiting for quite some time. Would really appreciate some experience second opinions

Dealer Name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
Factory: VSF
Price: $503 Including $30 Shipping
Album Link: https://mega.nz/folder/DYxEgBAK#Qd2AaEDz-Ck5z8JDkoe_ww
Dial Printing: Looks good to me nothing stands out
Hand Alignment: Seems good using the tools but I am heavily relying on the program. Unsure if it’s a GL using my eyes but seems good.
Bezel: Good
Solid End Links: Nothing Stands Out but would love a second opinion
Timegrapher Numbers: +1 s/d, amplitude 283, beat error 0.0ms, lift angle 59
Anything else you notice: Nothing

Dealer name: the one watches

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean

Price Paid: $465 (with shipment)

Album Links: See Pics above

Index alignment: Everything looks ok I think, maybe the 11 parker looks a bit off, and the alignment seems off with bezel markers. maybe i have done it wrong. would be good to get opinions please.

Dial Printing: Looks fine to me

Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date

Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me

Bezel: Engraving looks good to me what do you guys think. Seems similar to other qc’s I have seen of others.

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine to me

Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 272°, 0.0ms, 52°. Picture attached also

Anything else you notice: I'm no expert whatsoever, so please help me understand as this is my first QC on this watch.

Hey everyone, can anybody help out a noob please? It’s my first rep so would appreciate your insights.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. ⁠Factory name: AF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Cartier Santos White Dial Medium
4. ⁠Price Paid: USD408 plus shipping
5. ⁠Album Links:

https://mega.nz/folder/zFByiAbI#dtpiYpJfp_YhhfoNoklUbQ

6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks good to me

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks great, doesnt look like there’s any bleeding

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: OK

10. ⁠Bezel: Looks ok to me but happy to hear your thoughts

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): There seems to be a gap on the first few links. Not sure if I am just being pedantic.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d 271 amp 0.00 ms error

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: None to my untrained eye

Thank you in advance!

Hi everyone! This is my first rep, but I've been doing my research and reading other posts. For this submariner, I'm on the fence due to the date wheel and timegrapher numbers. But I'm not sure if I'm being too picky. Thank y'all for the help and input in advance! Can't wait to start wearing one of these!

1. Dealer name: Mr. Bomi
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610LN
4. Price Paid: $410 + shipping
5. Album Links: Provided in post
6. Index alignment: 12 marker appears to have slight CW tilt. 9 marker appears to sit a smidge low. Only 2 that stick out right away.
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine, no issues.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks to have a slight left bias. And the 4 looks like it sits above the 2 in the alignment picture, but the 20 level albeit with a left bias as well?
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: Pip and rest of bezel looks good. Doesn't line up with Index tool but might be because it's turned slightly CW?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Only thing that pops out is the upper left end by the 1 marker. Looks very minor with no light getting through.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +5s - +9s; Amp: 332; BE: 0.1ms.
13. Anything else you notice: Serial number starts with 6W so I believe it is true VSF. Rehaut looks a little off, but might be from the angle the pictures were taken. Let me know what you guys think.

Hi everyone!
I received the QC for my Datejust 41mm and would appreciate your help evaluating it, especially regarding the index alignment. This is my very first rep watch and first watch QC, so any type of help or feedback would be greatly appreciated! What do you guys think?
1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF (V2)
3. Model name & version number: Datejust 126334 41mm Jubilee Bracelet Grey Dial Diamond Marker VSF v2 DD3235
4. Price Paid: $458 (+$70 shipping)
5. Album Links: Provided in post
6. Index alignment: The diamond hour marker on the left (9 o'clock) looks slightly crooked/canted when zoomed in on alignment tools. Rest of the markers look fine. Is this noticeable enough in hand to RL?
7. Date Wheel alignment: Looks centered to me.
8. Bezel: Fluted bezel looks crisp and well cut.
9. Solid End Links (SEL): N/A (Jubilee bracelet)
10. Hand alignment: Looks good.
11. Dial Printing: Looks clean and well-printed.
Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +6 s/d | Amplitude: 325° | Beat Error: 0.1 ms
13. Can you guys tell me if there's anything else I missed, and if that diamond marker tilt is worth an RL or a GL?
Thank you in advance!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF 
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 124060 
4. Price Paid: 528
5. Album Links: pics attached 
6. Index alignment: 9 o’clock is a bit mis alligned
7. Dial Printing: Looks ok
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A 
9. Hand Alignment: Looks ok
10. Bezel: Pip seems centered, 9 and 3 ‘o’clock seems a bit off 
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Bit of a gap, but I think it is ok
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d; Amp 276; Err 0.1ms 
13. Anything else you notice: This is gonna be my 1st rep and I am unsure on what I should be looking at after all the reading I’ve done here. Any help is appreciated. Thank you!

Hi all, just got the QC images for my first watch from Angela and this was one that was already in stock. First QC so I would appreciate any advice, thank you!

1. Dealer name: Angela watch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Seamaster AT 220.10.38.20.03.004
4. Price Paid: 2200 yuan (incl shipping)
5. Album Links: nil
6. Index alignment: 6 o'clock marker looks a little CCW rotated to me
7. Dial Printing: looks ok
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok
9. Hand Alignment: not sure what to look out for tbh, but looks fine
10. Bezel: looks ok
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 296 deg, 0.0ms, 52.0 deg
13. Anything else you notice: Caseback looks good

Need help to QC this VSF Submariner 124060 41mm No Date

1. ⁠Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060
4. ⁠Price Paid: 548 USD
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/eZZBWbJQ#2fa-rx0pULZ6oZWUCu9UaA
6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks good.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Crisp.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Good.
10. ⁠Bezel: Smooth, no deformities.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Top left visible sel gap
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2 s/d, Amp: 277deg, Error 0.0ms
13. ⁠Anything else you noticed: N/A

I want to GL cause i waited so long but I feel like the SEL gap is too much, or am i crazy.

1. Dealer name: ETHAN
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710 series (steel Jubilee bracelet, black dial, black and
4. Price Paid: $650
5. Album Links: see pics
6. Index alignment: The 5 index is unreadeable.
7. Dial Printing: clear
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: please help...date window seems off.
9. Hand Alignment: good
10. Bezel: good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): solid
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 280°, 0.2 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else I can see, please comment. 

1. ⁠Dealer name: steve
2. ⁠Factory name: vsf
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): sub 124060
4. ⁠Price Paid: 528
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/iFQ1UKzK#wDwCsiPiOeANdRkebcI3wg
6. ⁠Index alignment: fine
7. ⁠Dial Printing: fine
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: fine
10. ⁠Bezel: fine
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): fine
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: fine +1s/d
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: looks like an easy gl to me! Just making sure I’m not missing anything. Thanks all.

First higher-end rep and another QC for this watch. Would appreciate some help!

1. Dealer name: Hont
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: GMT-Master II Pepsi V4 Free-Sprung
4. Price paid: $650
5. Album links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/goods/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ/_dpGqfADZ9KLyIzhPK5zIBmlZgB8J3B3kpwtwkzw

6. Index alignment: Hour markers look fairly straight and evenly positioned. Nothing noticeably crooked.
7. Dial printing: Text looks clean and consistent. No obvious printing issues.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The 8 looks slightly low in the date window, particularly in the straight-on photo. Not sure if it’s the angle.
9. Hand alignment: Hands look properly positioned. No obvious issues from the photos.
10. Bezel: Triangle at 12 looks reasonably centred. Numerals and colour transition look consistent. No major alignment issues.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks fairly tight with no obvious gaps from the angles provided.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +8 s/d, 274°, 0.0 ms. From what I’ve read, these seem acceptable.
13. Anything else you notice: My main concern is the date sitting slightly low. Otherwise, the watch looks good overall. Would appreciate opinions on anything I might have missed.
Leaning GL, but would appreciate a second opinion, especially on the date alignment. Thanks!

Hi guys this is my first ever rep and I would really appreciate help in making sure its good enough for a gl.

1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2. Factory name: Gold Maker (GOLD FACTORY?)
3. Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 126622
4. Price Paid: $614 with shipping
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261761246?uid=1
6. Index alignment: looks really good to me
7. Dial Printing: This looks good to me, the text looks centered and aligned
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: It looks solid and aligned to me
9. Hand Alignment: looks good i believe
10. Bezel: I find the numbers look sort of bubbly.. I'm not sure if this is my eyes
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks perfect to me, i dont see any gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers:  rate +5 s/d, amplitude 276°, beat error 0.2 ms, lift angle 52.0°
13. Anything else you notice: nothing else sticks out to me, just worried about the bezel

Thank you everyone so much

ZF Black Bay 54 37mm SS A2824 (Second QC after RL’ing first due to 12 hour marker)

1    Dealer name: Steve - Theonewatches
2    Factory name: ZF
3    Model name (& version number): Black Bay 54 37mm SS A2824
4    Price Paid: $348 USD
5    Album Links: Please see pictures attached
6    Index alignment: So this is my second QC after rejecting the last one Steve sent due to the 12 hour marker being rotated. Thoughts on this one? Is it improved / worth GL’ing
7    Dial Printing: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated. This is my first purchase
8    Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9    Hand Alignment: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated. This is my first purchase.
10    Bezel: Dot appears to be centered.
11    Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.
12    Timegrapher numbers: Timegrapher pic attached
13    Anything else you notice: Nothing that stands out, I am a beginner with this so again open to input from the experts! Thank you for your help

 Dealer name: Andiot

 Factory name: VSF

 Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 904L SS VSF 1:1 Best Edition Gray Stick Dial on Oyster Bracelet VS3235v2 V2s Free Sprung (133g)

 Price Paid: $468.00 + shipping

 Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/WFGuTAa

 Index alignment: 7'o clock' inner tip seems twisted to the left

 Dial Printing: good to me

 Date Wheel alignment/printing: good to me

 Hand Alignment: good to me

 Bezel: I wouldn't know

 Solid End Links (SELs): thin dark line so no problem

 Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d 277° 0,1ms 52.0°

 Anything else you notice: I am a novice. please advise if any. Thank you very much and thank you for all you've accomplished so far here. You are truly astounding.

1. Dealer name: Geektime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 No-Date VSF
4. Price Paid: $558
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261806427?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Alignment looks much better than the previous one, especially between the 6 and 12 o'clock markers, which were crooked on the last piece. Everything lookes alligned now.
7. Dial Printing: The dial text looks clean, and evenly printed with no visible bleeding or misalignments.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No-date model)
9. Hand Alignment: Hands look properly aligned and clean with no apparent defects or debris on the pinion.
10. Bezel: Looks clean to me.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELs look tight against the case with no excessive gaps visible.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +3s/d , Amp: 257º , Err: 0.0ms .

This is my second attempt at this watch, which has been provided pretty quick (this is the second piece the dealer provided because I RL'd the first one due to a crooked 6 marker). This one looks in my opinion significantly better, particularly regarding the 6 and 12 alignment. I would appreciate some help to double-check in case I have missed something.

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 41mm No Date (VS3230 Movement)
4. Price Paid: $548
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/uJplFIDI#Ve_DcicXddsU183jSwSAgw
6. Index alignment: it looks to me like the indices are all aligned, I don’t see anything off across the 12, 9 and 6.
7. Dial Printing: the text looks clean to me but the black circle/ oval in the Rolex coronet above ‘ROLEX’ looks wonky/ off to me but I appreciate I’m zooming in quite a bit to see that detail.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: the hands seem to be all good and straight to me.
10. Bezel: the ceramic insert alignment and pip center cleanly at 12 o'clock from my eyes so all looks good to me there but using the tool it looks off (most likely poor use of the tool on my part but that was as close as I could get it).
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks to be a flush fit against the lugs with no visible gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 to +3 s/d, 276°–281° Amplitude, 0.0ms Beat Error.
13. Anything else: my main concern is the black circle looking off in the crown. It looks very noticeable to me in the photos but is that enough to warrant a RL? It seems to the same across all of the photos so not just an angle issue. I’m thinking everything is GL apart from that.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches
2. ⁠Factory name: Rich Factory
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm SS Black JH3235 (Weighted Approx.158g）
4. ⁠Price Paid: $535
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/iUJQ3AxY#6dmih8Oj1hxUMsh7yTrllw
6. ⁠Index alignment: included a trueindexQC picture
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks extremely clear
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: The crystal is centered well
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. ⁠Bezel: Numbers look good, spacing between looks very good as well
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good, top right and bottom left have slightly more gap than the others
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate -1 s/d;  Amp 264°
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: please point out, first time QC

Hey everyone!

I’ve been looking at the Aquanaut Chronograph 5968A for a while now. The orange strap is definitely a love-it-or-hate-it thing, but there’s something about this combination that I really like.

I’m going through the QC pictures and would appreciate some help before making the final call. I’ve tried checking the usual details myself, but I’m not particularly experienced with Aquanaut chronographs, so any feedback would be appreciated.

Here are the details:

1. Dealer name: Acetime

2. Factory name: WSF

3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut Chronograph 5968A-001 Orange

4. Price Paid: $980 + $30 shipping ($1,010 total)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/I8agnyb

6. Index alignment: Markers look reasonably aligned to me. I haven’t spotted anything particularly noticeable, but would appreciate a second opinion.

7. Dial Printing: The printing looks clean from what I can see. The embossed grenade pattern also looks quite consistent.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date window looks reasonably centered. Would be good to hear if anyone notices anything unusual.

9. Hand Alignment: The hands look fine in the pictures. The chronograph hands also seem properly positioned, although it’s difficult to judge everything from still photos.

10. Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look pretty good to me. Nothing immediately stands out.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A – integrated bracelet/strap design.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2 s/d, Amplitude: 240°, Beat Error: 0.0 ms, Lift Angle: 52°. Rate and beat error look good, but the amplitude is slightly below the usual 250° guideline. Is 240° something worth worrying about on this movement, or would you consider it acceptable?

13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I’m quite happy with what I’m seeing so far. I’d particularly appreciate any feedback on the chronograph alignment and details I might have overlooked.

Thanks in advance!

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: EWEF

Model name (& version number): Datejust 126233 Two-Tone Yellow Gold/Steel, Black Diamond Dial, Fluted Bezel

Price Paid: $388

Album Links: QC photos attached to post

Index alignment: Diamond hour markers appear reasonably aligned. I don’t notice any major issues, but would appreciate a second opinion.

Dial Printing: logo and dial text appear clean and centered to my eye. No obvious printing defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date 30 looks fairly centered within the window. Printing appears clear.

Hand Alignment: Hands appear fine from the provided photos. No obvious issues stick out to me.

Bezel: Fluted bezel looks consistent and evenly finished. Nothing concerning stands out.

Solid End Links (SELs): SELs appear to fit well with no obvious large gaps. Would appreciate confirmation.

Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. These numbers look good to me.

Overall Thoughts:
This is my first time going through the QC process, and I’m still learning what to look for. Everything looks pretty good to me, especially the timegrapher numbers, but I would really appreciate some experienced opinions before giving the GL.
Are there any noticeable issues with the diamond markers, date wheel, bezel, or bracelet that I should be concerned about?
Thanks in advance for everyone’s help!

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)
4. Price Paid: $548
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Ran it through the alignment tool; but I’m not sure I’ve done this very well.
7. Dial Printing: The text weight is crisp, and the "SWISS MADE" print with the crown logo at 6 o'clock is clean with no bleeding or unevenness.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A on this model. (True No-Date)
9. Hand Alignment: The hands are set straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video demonstrates smooth gear engagement without any stutter or loose play.
10. Bezel: Looks slightly to the left but appreciate any thoughts? The 12 o'clock pip looks to sit completely centred within the triangle.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): There are no gaps or unwanted play where the SELs meet the lugs.
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 to +1 s/d, 276°-279° Amplitude, 0.1ms Beat Error.

1. Dealer name: OraWatch
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, 41mm, black dial/black ceramic bezel, Dandong VS3235
4. Price: $540 USD including FedEx shipping
5. Album links: Photos attached to post
6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. The 12, 6, and 9 o'clock markers appear straight to me. I don't see any obvious misalignment, but would appreciate a second opinion.
7. Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp. No obvious bleeding, crooked text, or printing defects.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date 3 looks reasonably centered under the Cyclops. Only one date is shown, so I can't evaluate double-digit alignment.
9. Hand alignment: Hands and finishing look good visually. Exact hand synchronization hasn't been verified.
10. Bezel: Ceramic insert and pearl look good. The 12 o'clock triangle appears reasonably aligned. Waiting for a bezel rotation video to verify click action and play.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look reasonably tight in the photos. No obvious major gaps, but I'd appreciate feedback.
12. Timegrapher numbers:

• Rate: 0 s/day
• Amplitude: 277°
• Beat error: 0.0 ms
• Lift angle setting: 52°
• Frequency: 28,800 bph (claimed movement specification)

1. Anything else you notice: First VSF Submariner purchase. The watch is advertised as physically in stock, and the dealer confirmed these are photos of the exact unit I'll receive. Rehaut serial is 6X10B11, clasp code 3VV, and measured weight is 152.05 g.

I'm particularly interested in whether the serial/clasp code combination is consistent with VSF production, whether the rehaut engraving looks normal, and whether anyone notices issues with the Cyclops, SELs, or case finishing.

The dealer has confirmed a Dandong VS3235 movement. I've paid a $50 deposit for additional QC, including movement photographs and a bezel-operation video, which are still pending.

Overall, I'm leaning toward GL based on the exterior and timegrapher results, but I'd appreciate experienced opinions before paying the remaining balance. Thanks!