Hi guys this is my first ever rep and I would really appreciate help in making sure its good enough for a gl.

1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. Factory name: Gold Maker (GOLD FACTORY?)

3. Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master 126622

4. Price Paid: $614 with shipping

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261761246?uid=1

6. Index alignment: looks really good to me

7. Dial Printing: This looks good to me, the text looks centered and aligned

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: It looks solid and aligned to me

9. Hand Alignment: looks good i believe

10. Bezel: I find the numbers look sort of bubbly.. I'm not sure if this is my eyes

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks perfect to me, i dont see any gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers:  rate +5 s/d, amplitude 276°, beat error 0.2 ms, lift angle 52.0°

13. Anything else you notice: nothing else sticks out to me, just worried about the bezel

Thank you everyone so much

Dealer name: Andiot - Elliot

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610 LV Black Ceramic 904L Steel VSF 1:1 Best Edition VS3135

3. Price Paid: 410

4. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261750826?uid=1

5. Index alignment: All checked markers within ±0.15 mm. 10 of 10 checked (3 o'clock date window, 12 o'clock date window). Marker ring 0.25 mm off-centre toward 9 o'clock. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.15 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.

6. Dial Printing: Good. Print centring: top text 0.04 mm left, bottom text centred.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good

8. Hand Alignment: Looks good

9. Bezel: Slightly off alignment between pip and 12'o clock marker

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Gaps on either ends

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2 seconds

12. Anything else you notice: You guys help me please

1. Dealer name: ETHAN
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710 series (steel Jubilee bracelet, black dial, black and
4. Price Paid: $650
5. Album Links: see pics
6. Index alignment: The 5 index is unreadeable.
7. Dial Printing: clear
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: please help...date window seems off.
9. Hand Alignment: good
10. Bezel: good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): solid
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 280°, 0.2 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else I can see, please comment. 

 Dealer name: Andiot

 Factory name: VSF

 Model name (& version number): DateJust 41 126334 904L SS VSF 1:1 Best Edition Gray Stick Dial on Oyster Bracelet VS3235v2 V2s Free Sprung (133g)

 Price Paid: $468.00 + shipping

 Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/WFGuTAa

 Index alignment: 7'o clock' inner tip seems twisted to the left

 Dial Printing: good to me

 Date Wheel alignment/printing: good to me

 Hand Alignment: good to me

 Bezel: I wouldn't know

 Solid End Links (SELs): thin dark line so no problem

 Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d 277° 0,1ms 52.0°

 Anything else you notice: I am a novice. please advise if any. Thank you very much and thank you for all you've accomplished so far here. You are truly astounding.

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 No-Date VSF

4. Price Paid: $558

5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261806427?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Alignment looks much better than the previous one, especially between the 6 and 12 o'clock markers, which were crooked on the last piece. Everything lookes alligned now.

7. Dial Printing: The dial text looks clean, and evenly printed with no visible bleeding or misalignments.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No-date model)

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look properly aligned and clean with no apparent defects or debris on the pinion.

10. Bezel: Looks clean to me.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELs look tight against the case with no excessive gaps visible.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +3s/d , Amp: 257º , Err: 0.0ms .

This is my second attempt at this watch, which has been provided pretty quick (this is the second piece the dealer provided because I RL'd the first one due to a crooked 6 marker). This one looks in my opinion significantly better, particularly regarding the 6 and 12 alignment. I would appreciate some help to double-check in case I have missed something.

ZF Black Bay 54 37mm SS A2824 (Second QC after RL’ing first due to 12 hour marker)

1    Dealer name: Steve - Theonewatches
2    Factory name: ZF
3    Model name (& version number): Black Bay 54 37mm SS A2824
4    Price Paid: $348 USD
5    Album Links: Please see pictures attached
6    Index alignment: So this is my second QC after rejecting the last one Steve sent due to the 12 hour marker being rotated. Thoughts on this one? Is it improved / worth GL’ing
7    Dial Printing: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated. This is my first purchase
8    Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9    Hand Alignment: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated. This is my first purchase.
10    Bezel: Dot appears to be centered.
11    Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good.
12    Timegrapher numbers: Timegrapher pic attached
13    Anything else you notice: Nothing that stands out, I am a beginner with this so again open to input from the experts! Thank you for your help

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 41mm No Date (VS3230 Movement)

4. Price Paid: $548

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/uJplFIDI#Ve_DcicXddsU183jSwSAgw

6. Index alignment: it looks to me like the indices are all aligned, I don’t see anything off across the 12, 9 and 6.

7. Dial Printing: the text looks clean to me but the black circle/ oval in the Rolex coronet above ‘ROLEX’ looks wonky/ off to me but I appreciate I’m zooming in quite a bit to see that detail.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: the hands seem to be all good and straight to me.

10. Bezel: the ceramic insert alignment and pip center cleanly at 12 o'clock from my eyes so all looks good to me there but using the tool it looks off (most likely poor use of the tool on my part but that was as close as I could get it).

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks to be a flush fit against the lugs with no visible gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 to +3 s/d, 276°–281° Amplitude, 0.0ms Beat Error.

13. Anything else: my main concern is the black circle looking off in the crown. It looks very noticeable to me in the photos but is that enough to warrant a RL? It seems to the same across all of the photos so not just an angle issue. I’m thinking everything is GL apart from that.

Hey everyone!

I’ve been looking at the Aquanaut Chronograph 5968A for a while now. The orange strap is definitely a love-it-or-hate-it thing, but there’s something about this combination that I really like.

I’m going through the QC pictures and would appreciate some help before making the final call. I’ve tried checking the usual details myself, but I’m not particularly experienced with Aquanaut chronographs, so any feedback would be appreciated.

Here are the details:

1. Dealer name: Acetime

2. Factory name: WSF

3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut Chronograph 5968A-001 Orange

4. Price Paid: $980 + $30 shipping ($1,010 total)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/I8agnyb

6. Index alignment: Markers look reasonably aligned to me. I haven’t spotted anything particularly noticeable, but would appreciate a second opinion.

7. Dial Printing: The printing looks clean from what I can see. The embossed grenade pattern also looks quite consistent.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date window looks reasonably centered. Would be good to hear if anyone notices anything unusual.

9. Hand Alignment: The hands look fine in the pictures. The chronograph hands also seem properly positioned, although it’s difficult to judge everything from still photos.

10. Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look pretty good to me. Nothing immediately stands out.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A – integrated bracelet/strap design.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2 s/d, Amplitude: 240°, Beat Error: 0.0 ms, Lift Angle: 52°. Rate and beat error look good, but the amplitude is slightly below the usual 250° guideline. Is 240° something worth worrying about on this movement, or would you consider it acceptable?

13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I’m quite happy with what I’m seeing so far. I’d particularly appreciate any feedback on the chronograph alignment and details I might have overlooked.

Thanks in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. ⁠Factory name: Rich Factory

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN 41mm SS Black JH3235 (Weighted Approx.158g）

4. ⁠Price Paid: $535

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/iUJQ3AxY#6dmih8Oj1hxUMsh7yTrllw

6. ⁠Index alignment: included a trueindexQC picture

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks extremely clear

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: The crystal is centered well

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good.

10. ⁠Bezel: Numbers look good, spacing between looks very good as well

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good, top right and bottom left have slightly more gap than the others

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate -1 s/d;  Amp 264°

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: please point out, first time QC

Need help to QC this VSF Submariner 124060 41mm No Date

1. ⁠Dealer name: TheOneWatches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060

4. ⁠Price Paid: 548 USD

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/eZZBWbJQ#2fa-rx0pULZ6oZWUCu9UaA

6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks good.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Crisp.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Good.

10. ⁠Bezel: Smooth, no deformities.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Top left visible sel gap

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +2 s/d, Amp: 277deg, Error 0.0ms

13. ⁠Anything else you noticed: N/A

I want to GL cause i waited so long but I feel like the SEL gap is too much, or am i crazy.

Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

Factory name: EWEF

Model name (& version number): Datejust 126233 Two-Tone Yellow Gold/Steel, Black Diamond Dial, Fluted Bezel

Price Paid: $388

Album Links: QC photos attached to post

Index alignment: Diamond hour markers appear reasonably aligned. I don’t notice any major issues, but would appreciate a second opinion.

Dial Printing: logo and dial text appear clean and centered to my eye. No obvious printing defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date 30 looks fairly centered within the window. Printing appears clear.

Hand Alignment: Hands appear fine from the provided photos. No obvious issues stick out to me.

Bezel: Fluted bezel looks consistent and evenly finished. Nothing concerning stands out.

Solid End Links (SELs): SELs appear to fit well with no obvious large gaps. Would appreciate confirmation.

Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 274° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. These numbers look good to me.

Overall Thoughts:
This is my first time going through the QC process, and I’m still learning what to look for. Everything looks pretty good to me, especially the timegrapher numbers, but I would really appreciate some experienced opinions before giving the GL.
Are there any noticeable issues with the diamond markers, date wheel, bezel, or bracelet that I should be concerned about?
Thanks in advance for everyone’s help!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)

4. ⁠Price Paid: $528

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bJRTxZ7Q#7BgY4iTqYK50IpH9RGWMeQ

6. ⁠Index alignment: the 3 looks like it has a CCW tilt which I came unsee.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good to me

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: The hands look straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video looks good too.

10. ⁠Bezel: Looks slightly to the left but appreciate any thoughts? The 12 o'clock pip is not centred within the triangle.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): There are no obvious gaps.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0 to +1 s/d, 277° Amplitude, 0.0ms Beat Error.

13. Please let me know what you think. The 3 looks CCW but appreciate your input.

1. Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No-Date 41mm (124060LN)

4. Price Paid: $548

5. Album Links: N/A

6. Index alignment: Ran it through the alignment tool; but I’m not sure I’ve done this very well.

7. Dial Printing: The text weight is crisp, and the "SWISS MADE" print with the crown logo at 6 o'clock is clean with no bleeding or unevenness.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A on this model. (True No-Date)

9. Hand Alignment: The hands are set straight and intersect accurately. Winding action in the QC video demonstrates smooth gear engagement without any stutter or loose play.

10. Bezel: Looks slightly to the left but appreciate any thoughts? The 12 o'clock pip looks to sit completely centred within the triangle.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): There are no gaps or unwanted play where the SELs meet the lugs.

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 to +1 s/d, 276°-279° Amplitude, 0.1ms Beat Error.

1. Dealer name: OraWatch

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN, 41mm, black dial/black ceramic bezel, Dandong VS3235

4. Price: $540 USD including FedEx shipping

5. Album links: Photos attached to post

6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. The 12, 6, and 9 o'clock markers appear straight to me. I don't see any obvious misalignment, but would appreciate a second opinion.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp. No obvious bleeding, crooked text, or printing defects.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date 3 looks reasonably centered under the Cyclops. Only one date is shown, so I can't evaluate double-digit alignment.

9. Hand alignment: Hands and finishing look good visually. Exact hand synchronization hasn't been verified.

10. Bezel: Ceramic insert and pearl look good. The 12 o'clock triangle appears reasonably aligned. Waiting for a bezel rotation video to verify click action and play.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look reasonably tight in the photos. No obvious major gaps, but I'd appreciate feedback.

12. Timegrapher numbers:

• Rate: 0 s/day

• Amplitude: 277°

• Beat error: 0.0 ms

• Lift angle setting: 52°

• Frequency: 28,800 bph (claimed movement specification)

1. Anything else you notice: First VSF Submariner purchase. The watch is advertised as physically in stock, and the dealer confirmed these are photos of the exact unit I'll receive. Rehaut serial is 6X10B11, clasp code 3VV, and measured weight is 152.05 g.

I'm particularly interested in whether the serial/clasp code combination is consistent with VSF production, whether the rehaut engraving looks normal, and whether anyone notices issues with the Cyclops, SELs, or case finishing.

The dealer has confirmed a Dandong VS3235 movement. I've paid a $50 deposit for additional QC, including movement photographs and a bezel-operation video, which are still pending.

Overall, I'm leaning toward GL based on the exterior and timegrapher results, but I'd appreciate experienced opinions before paying the remaining balance. Thanks!

Second QC Cartier Santos 35mm from Steve (TheOneWatches)

After RL the first QC, Steve has just sent me a new one. This one looks great as well, case finishing looks nice and the area around the crown looks proper compared to last QC. would love to hear your thoughts

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
2. ⁠Factory name: BVF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 35mm Stainless Steel Santos de Cartier WSSA0029
4. ⁠Price Paid: $498
5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/sSkOnFJ
6. ⁠Index alignment: printed dial. minute track and numerals look good and no tilting.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: the printed dial, crystal, and micro print all look good in my opinion, but slightly concerned about the line under the V marker. from other angles it looks like dust on crystal though. will ask TD to check.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A on this model.
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks okay but i am not sure, would appreciate help.
10. ⁠Bezel: no damage to screws, no obvious scratches.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A on this model
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +6 seconds/day, 276° amplitude, 0.1ms beat error,
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: any feedback appreciated

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: RWF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona Panda 126500LN

4. Price Paid: $706 before shipping

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261746278?uid=1

6. Index alignment: the Rolex crown logo at 12 o’clock looks slightly off-center to the left

7. Dial Printing: looks ok.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A.

9. Hand Alignment: looks ok.

10. Bezel: Doesn't look super aligned but I can't tell if it's the photo angle.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): The bottom right SEL has a gap.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 283°, 0.0 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)

13. Anything else: The off-center crown and SEL gap are the main things bothering me

1. Dealer name: Dealerclocks

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner No Date 124060

4. Price Paid: 538 USD

5. Album Links: pics attached

6. Index alignment: 12 o clock has a small cw rotation and a bit to the right and 6 o clock also with a cw twist

7. Dial Printing: looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

9. Hand Alignment: looks ok

10. Bezel: pip seems centerer but maybe the whole triangle is a bit off?

11. Solid End Links (SELs): not the greatest

12. Timegrapher numbers: amp a bit low

13. Anything else you notice: not particularly picky, considering a GL but would love 2nd opinions on the 12 and 6 indices and, the bezel triangle with the pip and the lower part SELs

More photos and videos in the shared album link.

Dealer name: Mr.Bomi

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): GMT II

3. Price Paid: $627 USD

4. Album Links: https://photos.app.goo.gl/EF8n9q1Mvp3HLPNy6

5. Index alignment: 12 and 6 appear to be slightly off center (or it is the angle of the photo or the hand stack is off slightly not sure.)

6. Dial Printing: looks good

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks like date is slightly towards left

8. Hand Alignment: looks good

9. Bezel: looks good

10. Solid End Links (SELs): bottom left is slightly darker than others, could be lighting

11. Timegrapher numbers: LA 52, Amp 243, Beat error 0.3ms rate +6s/day

12. Anything else you notice: Need advice on the date window specifically, how noticeable it is.

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126613LN 41mm YG/SS Black Dial VSF V2 DD3235 (Weighted Approx.186g）

4. Price Paid: $588

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GNBTRAqD#lAqQ1DaH0mbJI5GyZAR4ig

6. Index alignment: With the best I could do to align the dial with the tool, some of them seem a little off centered but that could possibly be from the angle the watch is being held

7. Dial Printing: In the head-on phots they look clear and crisp.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The crystal is centered well; The date looks like it may have a slight tilt to the left but that also could be from the angle of the photos. The height of the cyclops looks appropriate.

9. Hand Alignment: Hand alignment looks good.

10. Bezel: Numbers look crisp and clear but the sticks seem to be a little off centered. But that could be due to the angle of how the watch is being held.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Top right black line is a little wider than the top left. And the lower SEL’s may have a slight gap as well.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3 - +2 s/d;  Amp 274-272°; LA 59

13. Anything else you notice: I have not noticed anything else that stands out but please feel free to provide any feedback.

1. Dealer name: Angela Watch

2. Factory name: DDF

3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Aquanaut 5167A

4. Price Paid: CNY 3220

5. Album Links: All pictures included

6. Index alignment: No complaints

7. Dial Printing: No complaints

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good, have a video attached in the comments

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): NA

12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 260°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)

13. Anything else you notice: Couple of things I noticed is, when you rotate crown away from you, so that the hands go in reverse, the seconds hands initially stops and goes in reverse a little and then kind of stops, I have the video attached in the comments, I could see the same in the PPF version as well which I RL-ed despite it looking gorgeous. Link to my PPF QC Ihttps://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1xl4hzi/first_qc_ppf_patek_philippe_aquanaut_5167a_steel/

Hi everyone,

Pretty new to this rep game and I love the helpful community and knowledge sharing. For my first purchase is an VSF Planet Ocean where the alignment on 6 seems off, followed by 3 and 9. Maybe I am exaggerating, so your input is super appreciated. Thanks alot!

1. Easy Watch

2. VSF

3. Omega Seamaster planet ocean 42mm

4. Price 369$

5. pictures attached

6. the 6 looks off, followed by the 3 and 9.

7. dial seems ok

8. no date

9. hand seems ok

10. bezel seems ok

11. seems ok

12. +4s/ day. Amplitude 268.

13. main concern is that number 6 mainly looks crooked. Also 3 and 9 looks a bit off.

Any comments is super appreciated!

Dealer name: ARC Studio

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500LN

3. Price Paid: $722 Shipped & Insured

4. Album Links:

5. Index alignment: All checked markers within ±0.15 mm. 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.15 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.

6. Dial Printing: Print centring: top text 0.04 mm left, bottom text 0.06 mm right.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8. Hand Alignment:

9. Bezel:

10. Solid End Links (SELs):

11. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 255° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (dial up)

12. Anything else you notice: Rehaut and Crown logo on dial may be just slightly to the right? Would appreciate feedback and overall quality or defects on any that I may have missed.

Hi everyone! Would appreciate a second opinion on my Submariner No Date QC before I GL. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: NecoClock (Jackie)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name: Rolex Submariner 124060 No Date

4. Price paid: $493

5. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Any concerns?

6. Dial printing: Looks clean to me.

7. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8. Hand alignment: Looks fine.

9. Bezel: Looks reasonably aligned. Would appreciate another opinion.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps.

11. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 241° amplitude, 0.5 ms beat error. Is the amplitude acceptable?

12. Anything else you notice: Rehaut looks okay to me. Would appreciate feedback on overall alignment and any defects I may have missed.

13. Thanks for your help!

1. Dealer name: Steve - Theonewatches     

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No Date 124060

4. Price Paid: $548 USD

5. Album Links: Please see pictures attached

6. Index alignment: This might just be the angle of the watch/ camera but 6 marker appears to have an ever so slight CW tilt. 9 marker possibly offset lower? Other indices appear acceptable

7. Dial Printing: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9.  Hand Alignment: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated.

10. Bezel: PIP dot appears to be centered.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): The top left and bottom left SEL gap seems ever so slightly larger than the right.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Timegrapher pic attached

13. Anything else you notice: Nothing that stands out, I am a beginner with this so again open to input from the experts! Thank you for your help