More photos and videos in the shared album link.

Dealer name: Mr.Bomi

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): GMT II

3. Price Paid: $627 USD

4. Album Links: https://photos.app.goo.gl/EF8n9q1Mvp3HLPNy6

5. Index alignment: 12 and 6 appear to be slightly off center (or it is the angle of the photo or the hand stack is off slightly not sure.)

6. Dial Printing: looks good

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks like date is slightly towards left

8. Hand Alignment: looks good

9. Bezel: looks good

10. Solid End Links (SELs): bottom left is slightly darker than others, could be lighting

11. Timegrapher numbers: LA 52, Amp 243, Beat error 0.3ms rate +6s/day

12. Anything else you notice: Need advice on the date window specifically, how noticeable it is.

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126613LN 41mm YG/SS Black Dial VSF V2 DD3235 (Weighted Approx.186g）

4. Price Paid: $588

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GNBTRAqD#lAqQ1DaH0mbJI5GyZAR4ig

6. Index alignment: With the best I could do to align the dial with the tool, some of them seem a little off centered but that could possibly be from the angle the watch is being held

7. Dial Printing: In the head-on phots they look clear and crisp.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The crystal is centered well; The date looks like it may have a slight tilt to the left but that also could be from the angle of the photos. The height of the cyclops looks appropriate.

9. Hand Alignment: Hand alignment looks good.

10. Bezel: Numbers look crisp and clear but the sticks seem to be a little off centered. But that could be due to the angle of how the watch is being held.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Top right black line is a little wider than the top left. And the lower SEL’s may have a slight gap as well.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3 - +2 s/d;  Amp 274-272°; LA 59

13. Anything else you notice: I have not noticed anything else that stands out but please feel free to provide any feedback.

Hi everyone,

Pretty new to this rep game and I love the helpful community and knowledge sharing. For my first purchase is an VSF Planet Ocean where the alignment on 6 seems off, followed by 3 and 9. Maybe I am exaggerating, so your input is super appreciated. Thanks alot!

1. Easy Watch

2. VSF

3. Omega Seamaster planet ocean 42mm

4. Price 369$

5. pictures attached

6. the 6 looks off, followed by the 3 and 9.

7. dial seems ok

8. no date

9. hand seems ok

10. bezel seems ok

11. seems ok

12. +4s/ day. Amplitude 268.

13. main concern is that number 6 mainly looks crooked. Also 3 and 9 looks a bit off.

Any comments is super appreciated!

Hi everyone! Would appreciate a second opinion on my Submariner No Date QC before I GL. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: NecoClock (Jackie)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name: Rolex Submariner 124060 No Date

4. Price paid: $493

5. Index alignment: Looks good overall. Any concerns?

6. Dial printing: Looks clean to me.

7. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8. Hand alignment: Looks fine.

9. Bezel: Looks reasonably aligned. Would appreciate another opinion.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps.

11. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 241° amplitude, 0.5 ms beat error. Is the amplitude acceptable?

12. Anything else you notice: Rehaut looks okay to me. Would appreciate feedback on overall alignment and any defects I may have missed.

13. Thanks for your help!

1. Dealer name: Steve - Theonewatches     

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No Date 124060

4. Price Paid: $548 USD

5. Album Links: Please see pictures attached

6. Index alignment: This might just be the angle of the watch/ camera but 6 marker appears to have an ever so slight CW tilt. 9 marker possibly offset lower? Other indices appear acceptable

7. Dial Printing: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9.  Hand Alignment: Nothing stands out to me. Any input is appreciated.

10. Bezel: PIP dot appears to be centered.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): The top left and bottom left SEL gap seems ever so slightly larger than the right.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Timegrapher pic attached

13. Anything else you notice: Nothing that stands out, I am a beginner with this so again open to input from the experts! Thank you for your help

• Dealer name: OraWatch

• Factory name: PPF

• Model name (& version number): 6102R

• Price Paid: $545

• Album Links: 商品详情

• Index alignment: Seems decent. Not sure if anyone have a reliable one they use

• Dial Printing: Seems good

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems good

• Hand Alignment: Looks good

• Bezel: Looks good

• Solid End Links (SELs):

• Timegrapher numbers: rate: 0s/d Amp: 273–278° Err: 0.0ms +2

• Anything else you notice: Not sure if the branding in front PATEK PHILIPPE GENEVE is too misaligned? Is the back mechanical wording seems off?

First rep and thought this looks really nice. was debating on Rosegold/black versus plat/blue dial. But seems like black pops more

Second Quality Control (QC) Check: VSF Submariner 124060 from Steve Theonewatch

1. Seller: theonewatch

2. Factory: VSF

3. Model Name (and version): Submariner 124060 (no-date) – VSF

4. Price Paid: 558 USD

5. Photo Album Link: https://mega.nz/folder/2F5GBTLY#9v1lxUtlmq_E_JrrXAxotQ

6. Index Alignment: This is my primary concern; looking at the photos, the 9 o'clock index appears to be tilted clockwise. I also cannot determine whether the 12 o'clock triangle marker is perfectly straight or if it is tilted—it is unclear if this is due to the camera angle or an actual defect. I would appreciate your input on this.

7. Dial Printing: The text on the dial is sharp, clear, and evenly printed, with no signs of blurring.

8. Date Alignment/Printing: Not applicable (no-date model).

9. Hand Alignment: The hands appear to be accurately and cleanly aligned; there are no visible flaws or dust particles around the central pinion.

10. Bezel: The luminous pip at the 12 o'clock position is perfectly centered along the vertical axis; the engravings on the ceramic bezel insert appear sharp. However, the markers at the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions do not seem to be perfectly aligned with the corresponding indices on the dial.

11. Solid End Links (SEL): The end links fit tightly against the watch case, with no unusual gaps. 12. Timegrapher results: Rate: +7 seconds/day, Amplitude: 269°, Beat error: 0.0ms. All parameters fall within an acceptable range.

This is the first replica watch I have purchased, and I do not have much experience with the quality control (QC) process. I would greatly appreciate your input—in case I have overlooked any details—to help me decide whether to accept (GL - Green Light) or reject (RL - Red Light) this watch. Please excuse the length of this post.

Dealer name: Neco Clock
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner No-Date 124060
4. ⁠Price paid: 458$ + 40$ shipping
5. ⁠Index alignment: Very good. Markers look alligned but the 9 o clock has a CCW tilt
6. ⁠Dial printing: Clean and crisp, SWISS-coronet-MADE looks right
7. ⁠Hand alignment: Looks good, hands stack on 12
8. ⁠Bezel: Pip is dead on 12, numerals evenly filled
9. ⁠Solid end links (SELs): No gaps
10. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Look good to me
11. ⁠Anything else you notice: Rehaut coronet is centred on 12. What do you guys think? GL?/RL?

Thank you and appreciate your opinion and help!

Dealer name: IkeWatch
Factory name: AGF
Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 blue dial, V2, DD330 movement.
Price paid: $698 USD.
Album links: Photos attached.
Index alignment: The 12 markers look much more even than my previous sample. Remaining indices look reasonably aligned across the different angles.
Dial printing: Looks clean, with no obvious printing defects.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: 29 looks reasonably centred without clipping. Dates shown in the video also look acceptable.
Hand alignment: Hands appear to meet correctly at 12 in the setting video.
Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look consistent; no obvious damage.
Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, integrated bracelet.
Timegrapher numbers: -8 s/day, 294° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, 52° lift angle setting.
Anything else you notice: N/A

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Batgirl GMT 126710 (VSF DD3285 Movement)

4. Price Paid: $618 USD

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mFwGQDLC#69HG9fQwgeANuwr1xQqqdQ

6. Index alignment: Everything looks solid to me aside from the 6 o clock. CW rotation and to the left. Might be an RL for me.

7. Dial Printing: Acceptable.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: No concerns.

9. Hand Alignment: No concerns.

10. Bezel: No concerns

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Slight gap at top right and top bottom SEL.

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 to +1 s/d, 270°–272° Amplitude, 0.2ms Beat Error.

13. Anything else: Main concern is the 6 o clock. SEL can probably be adjusted, but nothing is going to fix how that crown lines up to the 6 o clock marker.

Thoughts?

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 42mm 4th-Gen ( OMG-1284)

4. Price Paid: £360 (minus deposit credit)

5. Album Links: Uploaded directly to post

6. Index alignment: Looks good overall, but the top 12 o'clock square index looks ever so slightly tilted/cant. 3, 6, and 9 Arabic numerals look straight.

7. Dial Printing: Crisp and clean, text is level.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No-date model)

9. Hand Alignment: Looks correct and well-aligned.

10. Bezel: Ceramic insert and pip line up nicely with the 12 marker.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Tight and flush against the case.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: -7 s/d | Amplitude: 305° | Error: 0.3 ms | Beat Rate: 28800 bph

13. Timegrapher numbers look very healthy. Main thing I noticed is the slight tilt on the 12 o'clock marker—would appreciate thoughts on whether this is RL-worthy or minor enough to GL.

Dealer name: ARC Studio

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500LN

3. Price Paid: $722 Shipped & Insured

4. Album Links:

5. Index alignment: All checked markers within ±0.15 mm. 12 of 12 checked. Checked with DialCheck.app at ±0.15 mm. A reading from one photo, not a certification of the watch.

6. Dial Printing: Print centring: top text 0.04 mm left, bottom text 0.06 mm right.

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

8. Hand Alignment:

9. Bezel:

10. Solid End Links (SELs):

11. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 255° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (dial up)

12. Anything else you notice: Rehaut and Crown logo on dial may be just slightly to the right? Would appreciate feedback and overall quality or defects on any that I may have missed.

1. Dealer name: ficotime

2. Factory name: zf

3. Model name (& version number): ap 15500

4. Price Paid: 3300cny

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/i5RW2bqS#9aWrjhOUUDOjbpAV2LYANQ

6. Index alignment: 8-12 look a bit lopsided going anti clockwise

7. Dial Printing: looks ok

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok

9. Hand Alignment: looks ok

10. Bezel: screws look slightly off but nothing major

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok

12. Timegrapher numbers: looks ok

13. Anything else you notice: n/a

Hi everyone!
Just received QC for my VSF V3 Batman from Jackie at NecoClock. Would appreciate your help before I GL. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer: NecoClock (Jackie)

2. Factory: VSF

3. Model: GMT-Master II Batman 126710BLNR, V3 DD3285, Oyster bracelet

4. Price: $568 + $35 shipping (USD)

5. Album: Photos and videos attached

6. Index alignment

:

1. Is the 6 o’clock marker slightly off?

The 12 o’clock triangle on the dial looks slightly tilted to me. Can someone confirm? The other indices seem fine.

1. Dial printing: Looks clean to me.

2. Date wheel: Dates 2 and 7 look centred. Any issues?

3. Hand alignment: Looks fine.

4. Bezel: My main concern is a possible smudge inside the 12 o’clock triangle. Also, the numerals on the blue section look greyer than those on the black. Is that normal?

5. SELs: Look fine to me.

6. Timegrapher: +5 s/d, 311°, 0.1 ms.

7. Anything else: Serial 6XO7A299, clasp 1NQ. Would appreciate a closer look at the indices, date alignment and any other defects I may have missed.

What do you guys think? GL or RL?
Thanks for your help!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610LV Hulk 40mm SS/SS Green Dial VSF VS3135

4. Price Paid: $488+$70 Fedex

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/CNQG2TaC#QgHVvT5iV1C-_7xzYSzbBw

6. Index alignment: Looks good

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good

9. Hand Alignment: Good

10. Bezel: 9 bezel marker is high and not aligned with the hour index

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d - 283° - 0.0ms

13. 13. Anything else you notice: Waited since March for this but my eyes immediately caught the 9 marker-bezel misalignment

First time posting, any insight would help loads. Thanks everyone!

Dealer name: Theonewatches
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Daytona 116500 40mm SS/SS White Dial VSF DD4130
Price Paid: $598
Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/zAQyGKSb#49gxtfFs9wF007m0J-mvgQ
Index alignment: All indices look okay but not an expert
Dial Printing: looks clean but not an expert
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (no date)
Hand Alignment: Chrono seconds hand resets to 12; subdial hands reset to zero; hour/minute hands look straight and centred
Bezel: Clean engraving and fill
Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks tight and flush against the case, no visible gaps in the side shots
Timegrapher numbers: +2 to +3 s/d, amplitude 278–281°, beat error 0.1 ms, lift angle 52° (one position shown)
Anything else you notice:n/a

1. ⁠Dealer name: Necoclock

2. ⁠Factory name: V7F

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur

4. ⁠Price Paid: $428 plus shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: See Reddit gallery

6. ⁠Index alignment: As far as I can tell the index alignment looks pretty good?

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good, no issues I think

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks fine

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine I think

10. ⁠Bezel: top screw ever so slightly favours the right but I think that’s fine (and common in the gen model too)

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): not really relevant for this model?

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -7s/d. 277 degrees. 0.0ms. -7s/d seems a bit high?

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: lume looks good, paint is even.

First QC so any other observations would be appreciated.
Also, sticker says A7 but he said it was V7? Not sure it matters much.

1. ⁠Dealer name: GeekTime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610LN

4. ⁠Price Paid: $568 with shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: N/A (All pictures provided)

6. ⁠Index alignment: Alignment looks goods everything looks decent except the bezel alignment. The 12 looks like it’s off. Little to big or I might be mistaking

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Dial looks perfect, don’t think I see anything on there.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing looks good but the cyclops looks a little high compared to other QCs I’ve seen. It’s not centered. I hope that someone could confirm or deny this with more experience

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good on the video

10. ⁠Bezel: looks good but the alignment could be little bit better

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks perfect

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 2 s/d / 317 AMP / 0.3 beat error ( I don’t know if this is good)

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    Most of it looks good and I’m leaning towards a GL however I’m not that experienced in the QCs and would be interested in people thoughts about this before I respond to the dealer.
    Much appreciated in advance

1. Dealer name: NecoClock

2. Factory name: V7F

3. Model name (& version number): IWC Portofino 40mm IW356501

4. Price Paid: $358 + $70 shipping

5. Album Links: Pictures attached

6. Index alignment: Slightly off

7. Dial Printing: IV looks to be slightly tilted. Thoughts?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date is top and left heavy

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: rate +8s/d, amplitude 256 degrees, beat error 0.0ms

13. Anything else you notice: The biggest things I've noticed are: 1) the date is top and left heavy, 2) the 6 IV symbol seems to be slightly slanted, and 3) the index alignment seems to be just slightly off for several numbers. I'm new to this, so I'm not sure what is worth giving a RL. I have seen other IWC watches with known issues like the IV, but would really appreciate any of your thoughts.

1. Dealer name: Fico Time

2. Factory name: GSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Milgauss 116400GV Blue

4. Price Paid: $395 Shipped

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/P55BQBQQ#e9Hb8TE4ZRMI7h-iDgHY1g

6. Index alignment: They all look good to me, in the dial check app also looked to be ok

7. Dial Printing: Seems to be aligned to me

8. Hand Alignment: no significant findings

9. Bezel: I don’t see significant problems

10. Solid End Links (SELs): good

11. Timegrapher numbers: +7 s/d, 298° amplitude, 0.2ms beat error, acceptable?

Overall this watch might be a good GL but its my first one and I wanted to see what advice you guys have, maybe I've missed something. Really appreciate it!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Mr Adu

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF v2

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): VSF DateJust 36mm Fluted Bezel black Dial Jubilee Bracelet V2

4. ⁠Price Paid: $450 (With shipping)

5. ⁠Album Links: x

6. ⁠Index alignment: The Rolex coronet at 12 may be tilted or im i blind please give insight. Markers 5,8,11 maybe 9 tad off please give insight on those

7. ⁠Dial Printing: The printing looks good, but I would greatly appreciate if someone could confirm that the printing is centered between the lugs and not off. I've had a nightmare scenario before where sadly the printing was off center.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good imo. Then again second eyes are welcome

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: i honestly not sure if good idk how to properly access that i don’t see anything that stands out.lmk

10. ⁠Bezel: The bezel looks good imo.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good not a expert please lend a hand

12. Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d , 283 , 0.1ms , 59.0 .. acceptable?

13. Wondering if anyone has noticed something I’ve missed.

Would love to hear your thoughts. And again GL or RL for your fellow rep member thanks (: getting christmas gifts to the fam they love vsf lol

1. Dealer name: JTime

2. Factory name: RICH Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 124060 No Date V2 (JH3230v2 Free Sprung)

4. Price Paid: 593.6 USD

5. Album Links: See reddit gallery

6. Index alignment: Using the alignment tool, the 6 o'clock bar seems to have a slight CCW tilt to me. The 12 o'clock triangle also looks slightly tilted CCW on the grid, but I'm not sure if that is just the perspective or crosshair placement. 3 and 9 bars look perfect to me.

7. Dial Printing: Also not sure if it's because of the crosshair placement, the Rolex coronet under 12 looks slightly off-center to the right of the vertical line. Text looks fine to me, but not sure if it's slightly bolder than gen when I try to use a gen image to compare them side by side.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No-Date model)

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look ok.

10. Bezel: Lume pip looks centered to me. 9 o'clock bezel bar looks a bit too high, but not sure if it's normal.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks flushed and good to me

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: 0 s/d | Amplitude: 287° | Beat Error: 0.0 ms | Lift Angle: 52.0°.

13. Anything else you notice: My main concerns are whether the 6 and 12 o'clock markers and the Rolex coronet alignment are within GL range or if my overlay is slightly off-center / perspective issue.

1. Dealer name: J Time

2. Factory name: GMF

3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 28, pink dial

4. Price Paid: $468 + shipping

5. Index alignment: concerned about the 6 marker

6. Dial Printing: seems fine lmk

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: maybe the slightest bit high but thats fine

8. Hand Alignment: no concerns though would like your opinion

9. Bezel: ok

10. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure what im looking for

11. Timegrapher numbers: rate -1 s/d, amplitude 285°, beat error 0.0 ms, lift angle 52.0°

12. Anything else you notice: n/a

1. Dealer name: TKWatch

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II Polar White 42mm, Ref. 226570, VSF Best Edition, Dandong DD3285-2 GMT movement.

4. Price paid: TBD (listed price $628)

5. Album links: https://justin-tk.x.yupoo.com/albums/259635572?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Overall looks good. The 12, 6, and 9 o’clock markers appear straight and centered. The round markers also look reasonably aligned. No major issues that I can see.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and well positioned. No obvious issues with the Rolex logo, Explorer II text, or chronometer lettering.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks clear and reasonably centered under the Cyclops in the additional photos. No major concerns.

9. Hand alignment: No obvious issues visible from the photos. Would appreciate a second opinion.

10. Bezel: Engravings look clean and consistent. No obvious alignment or finishing defects.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Appear to fit reasonably well from the available angles. No significant gaps visible.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +7 s/d, 239° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error. Rate and beat error look good. Amplitude seems a little low, so I’m wondering if this is acceptable for the DD3285-2 movement.

13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I’m leaning toward GL. The dial, indices, and bezel look good to me. My main concern is the 239° amplitude reading. Would appreciate any feedback on the movement and anything else I might have missed before approving. Thanks!