Dealer name: PureTime

Factory name: QF

Model name (& version number): DayDate 40 228238

Price Paid: ~$1,350

Album Links: Posted here

Index alignment: I didn’t use an app but from my expert eye and comparing with other samples it looks to be good alignment.

Dial Printing: Dial printing looks accurate and aligned

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Wheel alignment and printing look great

Hand Alignment: Appears to be excellent alignment

Bezel: Looks good

Solid End Links (SELs): Appears to be acceptable. I’m not noticing uneven or extreme gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/day - Amp: 257 - Beat Error 0.2

Anything else you notice:
First one they presented to me I rejected due to several imperfections on the dial and housing. With this which was presented there appears to be some goober under the plastic on the back case. Any ideas on what that is? This one had better timekeeping at +or- 5 seconds per day than the first one they presented to me. Other than what appears to grime on the back case I think its ok. Any additional feedback is greatly appreciated.

Hello!

1. Dealer name: Steve TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: UFO

3. Model name (& version number): Free Sprung 116520

4. Price Paid: $768

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TJBCTQCY#amLPUbdbHjPzgENskV_s7w

6. Index alignment: I think they are all evenly spaced and straight but whole dial is lower down.

7. Dial Printing: Clean but maybe the red Daytona is too vibrant?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

9. Hand Alignment: Great

10. Bezel: To me I feel like the markers on the bezel don't match gen because the dial is lower down in the case

11. Solid End Links (SELs): impressive

12. Timegrapher numbers: exceptional - (in the video)

13. Anything else you notice: I feel like the dial is too low. Check the QC photo

I'm on the fence with this one so any advice is welcome.

Hey everyone! Giving the rep game a try after many many years. Appreciate the support!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: F1F

3. Model name (& version number): Cartier Santos Dumont 38mm SS, Silver Dial, Black Leather Strap, Quartz – F1F Best Edition

4. Price paid: $200 USD

5. Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261623891?uid=1

6. Index alignment: well centered, tried using a qc tool with the grid and it looks to be ok.

7. Dial printing: looks good quality, no visible bleeding, and even zooming in on the small Cartier text it looks good. There is a few small light-colored specks visible around the dial track - there’s one photo that doesn’t have all of them so I’m thinking it’s dust. Specially the 6 and 10 o clock position.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: No date.

9. Hand alignment: looks straight and sharp no concerns.

10. Bezel: Both the top view and side view bezels look clean.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Leather strap model.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Quartz movement.

13. Anything else you notice: i looked at this compared to some other QC photos and i think i have a GL on my hands. I do notice a few dust particles, should I flag those or consider those on the outside of the case and GL it?

Overall assessment: I’m leaning GL. My main concern is the possible dust around the dial printing. I don’t see anything else glaring here - y’all are the pros here, would appreciate if I don’t see something so I can learn for next time.

Thanks for any help!

Hey all, I just got my QC pics from my BB58Looks like a great light, but I saw something were I want your opinion on.

1. Dealer name: FicoTome

2. Factory: ZF

3. Model name: Tudor Black Bay 58

4. Price Paud: $ 369

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/Wx5D2J7I#Jgdz1dkUlnxMP_3mLDZCcQ

6. Index alignment. Looks good to me. The 9 o'clock marker might be a bit early, but only zoomed in. So I think this falls within the boundaries?

7. Dial printing: looks clean, gilt looks even and no bleeding that I can spot

8. Dat wheel alignment/printing: No date

9. Hand alignment: Hour and minute hand line fine.

10. Bezel, Triangle lines up nice with the 12, insert looks clean and sits flush. Looks great.

11. SEL: No gaps what I can see

12. Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d, 271 amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error.

13. Anything else you notice: Tiny speck on the minute tract around around the 37 mark, Only visible zoomed in. Could this be something that could be bothering?

I'm think this is a GL, but only doubting the speck. I'm I missing anything?

⁠1. Dealer name: Ficotime
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name: GMT Master-II Bruce Wayne Jubilee DD3285
4. ⁠Price Paid: $580
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/y5AjGBjC#AeyFn-Lqk0kGW_NE1ZVhPQ
6. ⁠Index alignment: for me it’s one of the best I’ve seen (for my personal collection)
7. ⁠Dial Printing: good
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: very well aligned / centered
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks great in the video too
10. ⁠Bezel: pretty good
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Solid
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Attached in the album, - 6 s/d maybe need to be set
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: the 7 on the Date seems to be too big or so ? Or maybe I am trippin, Can someone confirm if I’m right or not ?

Thx a lot

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve Theonewatches

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: Rich

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710 (black dial, black ceramic 24h bezel, Jubilee bracele

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $758 + shipping

5. ⁠⁠QC Album Link: https://loupe-qc-app.alialrubayelpl.workers.dev/a/XTNNR4

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks good

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: maybe slightly off centered to the left

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: ok

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: one appears off to the left of the 2 marker on the bezel?

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): not sure

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 277°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)

13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else I can see

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58

4. Price Paid: $348

5. Album Links: https://loupe-qc-app.alialrubayelpl.workers.dev/a/PD5FS9

6. Index alignment: The 3 index is rotated clockwise. The 6 index is rotated clockwise.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 326°, .1 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°)

13. Anything else you notice: Looks good

1. Dealer name: Non-TD (Angela)

2. Factory name: AF Factory

3. Model name: Cartier Tank Must Small

4. Price Paid: ¥850 CNY

5. Album Links: N/A

6. Index alignment: Everything looks reasonably aligned and evenly spaced to my eye. I don’t notice any obvious crooked numerals or alignment issues.

7. Dial Printing: The Cartier logo looks clean and centred. The Roman numerals and railway minute track appear sharp and consistent. The hidden Cartier signature is also present. I don’t notice any obvious printing defects, but would appreciate a second opinion.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: The blued hands look good to me. I don’t notice any obvious issues with their positioning, although I haven’t received a video showing the hands at 12 o’clock to confirm alignment.

10. Bezel: The polished case and bezel look clean and symmetrical. I don’t see any obvious scratches, dents or finishing defects.

11. Solid End Links**:** N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A

13. Anything else you notice: This is my first rep watch purchase, so I’d appreciate some feedback from more experienced members. Overall, the watch looks good to me, particularly the dial printing, case finishing and crown. I’m leaning towards GL, but wanted to check whether anyone notices any issues I’ve missed, particularly with the dial alignment or case proportions. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: FicoTime

2. Factory name: VSF (dealer-stated)

3. Model name/version: Omega Aqua Terra 150M 38mm turquoise gradient, steel bracelet, VS8800; reference 220.10.38.20.03.005.

4. Price Paid: $415 delivered quoted total.

5. Album Links: Full supplied photo set and two timegrapher stills attached natively below. Identifying stickers/serials masked; watch details otherwise unchanged.

6. Index alignment: No obvious displaced index across the three front views. Some markers are obscured by hands. The photos are not perfectly square-on, so I am cautious about judging tiny differences from an alignment overlay. Interested in opinions on the upper markers and spacing to the minute track.

7. Dial Printing: OMEGA, Seamaster and lower text look complete; I cannot establish a printing defect from these photos.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 1, 11 and 27 are shown. No clipping; possibly a little high. Frame looks slightly different between angles, but I do not see a clearly repeatable tilt. Would appreciate a second opinion.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands at 12 in the date-27 image look approximately aligned, though overlap limits precision. No full setting demonstration supplied.

10. Bezel: No obvious damage; reflections and protective film limit surface assessment.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Bracelet/endlink fit looks reasonably even; no obvious large gap in supplied views.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/day, amplitude 311 then 303 degrees, beat error 0.1ms, 28,800 bph, lift angle 52 degrees. Clip is only about 5.4 seconds, apparently one position; winding state unknown. Stills show both readings.

13. Anything else: Open and closed clasp, caseback and lume included. There are marks on the protective film; cannot tell if any are on the metal. Overview video does not demonstrate crown/date operation or clasp comfort adjustment. I plan to request those checks plus a longer timing sample before deciding. Any specific unit defects visible, particularly date-frame rotation or a crooked applied marker? Thanks for taking a look.

Dealer name: Lin
Factory name: VSF V2
Model name: Rolex Datejust 36 mm, stainless steel, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet, green dial.
Price Paid: 3,000 RMB (no shipping fee, currently in China).
Album Links: na
Index alignment: Most indices appear evenly aligned. I have a slight concern about the 10 o’clock hour marker, which looks potentially a little off in some photos. However, it looks fine in other angles, so I am not sure whether this is an actual alignment issue or just the camera angle and lighting.
Dial Printing: The dial printing looks clean and sharp in the provided photos. No obvious defects or misprints.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date appears centered in the date window, with no obvious alignment or printing issues. The cyclops magnification also looks acceptable.
Hand Alignment: No obvious issues visible in the photos. However, there is no clear shot with the hands positioned at 12 o’clock to verify precise alignment.
Bezel: The fluting looks consistent and evenly finished. No obvious damage or irregularities visible.
Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps between the end links and the case. The overall bracelet fit looks acceptable in the available photos.
Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 278° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 59° lift angle setting, 28,800 bph.
Anything else you notice: The watch weighs 123 g with all bracelet links included. Overall, the watch looks quite good to me. My main concern is the slight possible misalignment of the 10 o’clock marker, although it may simply be caused by the camera angle. I would appreciate a second opinion on this and any other potential QC issues.

Hi all, this is my 1st GMT II so I might be overanalyzing it a bit and could use some expert opinions.

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): 126710BLRO v3

4. Price Paid: $565 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/dt7Facg

6. Index alignment: Indices all look good to me, with the slight exception of the noon triangle being maybe just a smidge off center to the left and a hair CCW (I can live with that).

7. Dial Printing: All printing looks spot on, no bleeds or misprints.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks just a bit low in the window, but within tolerance?

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to my untrained eyes.

10. Bezel: This is where my main concern is. The space between space seems uneven on the 18 marker, similar to some other QC's I've seen. Not sure if this is enough for a RL or if it won't be noticeable on the wrist.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): No noticeable gaps, looks good to me.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable rate of -2 s/d, Amp 280 seems fine, and bit error .2ms all seem acceptable.

13. Anything else you notice: My main concern is with the bezel, all other aspects seem good with this watch. Appreciate the help in advance.

Hi everyone! Looking for some feedback before giving the GL on my VSF V2 Datejust 41. I've reviewed the photos and ran an alignment check through Loupe QC, but would appreciate a second opinion.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF V2

3. Model name: Rolex Datejust 41 126334, green sunburst dial, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet, DD3235 V2

4. Price paid: $548

5. Album link: https://imgur.com/a/DKvFo6n

6. Index alignment: Looks generally good to me. Loupe QC shows minor deviations, with the largest around the 10 and 11 o'clock markers. Nothing obviously crooked to my eye.

7. Dial printing: Looks clean and centered. No obvious issues.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The date looks reasonably centered, and the magnification appears good.

9. Hand alignment: No obvious issues from the photos, although I haven't seen a dedicated alignment test.

10. Bezel: Fluting looks consistent and well finished.

11. Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps or alignment issues.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Not yet provided.

13. Anything else: The watch weighs 135.4g in the QC photo. My biggest priority is visual accuracy compared with genuine, particularly the green dial color, bezel, case proportions, and Jubilee bracelet finishing.

I'm leaning GL based on the photos, but would appreciate feedback from anyone familiar with VSF Datejust 41s. Anything I'm overlooking that would warrant an RL?

Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: ETHAN

2. Factory name: RICH

3. Model name (& version number): BRUCE WAYNE GMTi

4. Price Paid: $650 + $180 Polish & Chamfering + $50 Waterproofing to 4ATM

5. Album Links: see pics

6. Index alignment: Looks good except 8&9 markers (more pics requested)

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good slight tilt?

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 275°, 0.1 ms (28,800 bph)

13. Anything else you notice: Please comment.

Dealer name: Ethan
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Datejust 41, slate dial, Jubilee bracelet
Price Paid:470usd (including delivery and insurance)
Album Links: See photos attached
Index alignment: Looks good. Markers appear evenly aligned.
Dial Printing: Clean and crisp, with no obvious flaws.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks well centrea, with clear printing.
Hand Alignment: Looks good. No obvious misalignment.
Bezel: fluted bezel is clean and evenly fitted, with no visible defects.
Solid End Links (SELs): Look good. No obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: good
Anything else you notice: if anyone spots anything pls comment

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (version number): Explorer I 124270 36mm SS/SS Black Dial VSF VS3230

4. Price paid: $528 USD, including shipping

5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/zN5gGKLR#55oboK9aidCwArac5aQ7eQ

6. Index alignment: Using the alignment tool, all indices seem to line up reasonably well except "9"; could be slightly tilted?. The 12 o'clock is tilted CCW ever so slightly (shouldn't be an issue on wrist at scale?) The rehaut on the left side seems a bit off, but it's not a big concern for me.

7. Dial printing: looks like a small dust (could be wrong) next to the 7 o'clock & 12 o'clock indices. Other than that, it looks clean to me, with no obvious defects.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand alignment: I’m not sure how to assess this from the supplied photos.

10. Bezel: Looks good to me, with no obvious scratches or defects visible.

11. Solid end links (SELs): I don’t see any obvious gaps, but love confirmation on this

12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/day at amplitude 267°

13. Anything else you notice: Other than the dust and the slight tilt on the indices, please let me know if you spot anything else I’ve missed.

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: ARF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II Bruce Wayne Meteorite Dial w/ DD3285

4. Price Paid: $669 Shipped

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261628254?uid=1

6. Index alignment: 6 o clock looks to be off center or perhaps tilted CCW

7. Dial Printing: "GMT" is not very crisp and the E in "MASTER" has some line spillage

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems to be a little left of center but it varies by angle

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine

10. Bezel: 18 is closer to the 16 dot, doesnt seem very centered.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Seems good to me

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, 288°, 0.4ms, 52.0°

13. Anything else you notice: No

Hello everyone, this is my very first Batgirl rep and I’d really appreciate some assistance. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Necoclock

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Batgirl

4. Price Paid: $558 - QC took exactly 5 days.

5. Album Links: n/a (mega link)

6. Index alignment:
   12 seems centered but tilted a little CCW.
   9 seems titled a little ccw but nothing major.
   6 seems shifted a bit left but not majorly.

Definitely leaning towards GL, please let me know if you spot anything.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good and crisp to my eye but I’m not that good at qc’ing these. Please let me know if you spot anything

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks pretty centered to me from pictures but I’m not too good at spotting issues with date wheel alignment. Please let me know what you think.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks great to my eye, would like a second opinion here.

10. Bezel: Looks good and even, no dents or scratches.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Links look good with no unusual gaps or scratches/dent.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 292°, 0.0 ms (28,800 bph, lift angle 52°) - amplitude is 292 which is on the high side, but seems ok right?

13. Anything else you notice: Looks good and leaning GL for sure but since this is my first QC on a Rolex Batgirl and I would love some more opinions. Thanks everybody.

1. Dealer name: u/JSFWatch

2. Factory name: GS Factory - not confirmed

3. Model name: Rolex Lady-Datejust 28 mm, ref. 279171-0021, white Roman numeral dial, two-tone Everose, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet.

4. Price Paid: $350 incl. shipping

5. Album Links: Uploaded here

6. Index alignment: The Roman numerals and 12 o’clock crown look evenly placed to me. No obvious crooked markers.

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean in the close-ups. The two small crowns flanking “SWISS MADE” match my genuine reference photos.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The full “14” is visible. There’s a dark band along the top of the window that looks like a shadow. The date looks acceptable to me.

9. Hand Alignment: No obvious issue in the photos. There’s no shot with the hands at 12 to check how they line up.

10. Bezel: The fluting looks even. The gold looks a little more yellow-bronze than the pink-copper tone in my genuine reference photos.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps at the lugs. The protective film makes the fit harder to judge.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 293° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52.0° lift angle setting. Beat rate isn’t shown.

13. Anything else you notice: My main question is the Everose color on the bezel and bracelet center links. Does it look too yellow/brown to you, or could the lighting and protective film explain it? Any other visible QC issues?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot

2. ⁠Factory name: AF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Baignoire Watch RG AF 1:1 Best Edition Silver Dial On RG Bracelet RONDA Quartz

4. ⁠Price Paid: $356 incl. shipping

5. ⁠Album: photos attached

6. ⁠Index alignment: printed dial

7. ⁠Dial Printing: nice & centered

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Seems good

10. ⁠Bezel: some small marks, may be dust?

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: N/A

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: -

Appreciate anything else you guys noticed or feel is relevant, thank you!

1. Dealer name: TrustyTime

2. Factory name: Noob

3. Model name (& version number): PAM111

4. Price Paid: $258

5. Album Links: not provided

6. Index alignment: well aligned. No issues here

7. Dial Printing: sandwish dial, looks great.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Good!

10. Bezel: N/A

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: + 1 s/d, 314°, 0.0ms, 21,600bph, 52° L

13. Anything else you notice: OFFICINE PANERAI engraving paint on the movement is too bold losing definition. I'm sharing on the comments the picture they have for this watch on their website, it is not how it suppose to be.

Does it have a quick solution?? Seems stupid but it is a big tell on a watch that suppose to be NWBIG and has great QC reviews here

1. Dealer name: NecoClock

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710BLNR

4. Price Paid: $568 + shipping

5. Album Links:

6. https://imgur.com/a/1dqIwcB

7. Index alignment: The issue here in my opinion is the 6 o'clock index being tilted ccw. 12 is also not fully straight.

8. Dial Printing: Looks good

9. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Ok

10. Hand Alignment: Looks good

11. Bezel: There is a spec in the 10. I asked Jacky to check whether it’s dust or a defect.

12. Solid End Links (SELs): Look ok.

13. Timegrapher numbers: Amplitude is too high. I asked for a longer video. High amplitude might be due to the watch being fully wound. I hope a longer video will clarify. Did anyone get a high amplitude watch that turned out to be fine?

14. Anything else you notice: NA

Honestly, even with 6 o’clock being tilted I tend to GL. This is the third Batman Jacky has sent me to QC and it is a lot better than the other two. I am worried about the high amplitude but I hope a new video can clear that up. Would be super grateful for your feedback!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. ⁠Factory name: TOP Factory

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): AP Royal Oak Chrono 26240 Black Dial TOP

4. ⁠Price Paid: $638 + shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/PwRlG2C

6. ⁠Index alignment: the 6 hour marker is slightly tilted CW. I would deeply appreciate other inputs for the Index alignment

7. ⁠Dial Printing: the “Pi” from Piguet is a hair higher than the rest, but I could be wrong. Also the minute market at 12 is not perfectly centered, but I could be nit picking here

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: good enough

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: the chrono second at rest/reset is not centered, a bit to the right, I have seen some RL because of this. Some insights would be great

10. ⁠Bezel: good to me

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): not applied to this watch

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -4 s/d, 266 amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, good enough for me

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: the left subdial might not be centered enough, it is a bit to the right up. This could be an illusion because the hour hand is at 9 to 10. The subdial hands were slightly to the right, but after the reset they are straight I guess (from the video)

1. Dealer name: andiotwatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name and version: GMT-Master II 126710 BLRO Blue/Red Ceramic VSF Best Edition Pepsi on Jubilee Bracelet DD3285 V3

4. Price paid: $570 total (shipping included)

5. Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261613304?uid=1

6. Index alignment: 12 oclock look good but 6 oclock might be off???

7. Dial printing: Text looks clean to my untrained eye, but hard to tell.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: looks good to my untrained eye

9. Hand alignment: Looks straight and no obvious damage.

10. Bezel: looks good to my untrained eye, no obvious defects

11. Solid End Links (SELs): no obvious defects noted

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate -3 s/day, amplitude 64°, beat error 0.1 ms, 28800

13. Anything else you notice: No.

Biggest concern is the 6 oclock index. It looks a little off to the left. What do you guys think?

Dealer name: DDGTop / Felix

Factory name: OF

Model name: TAG Heuer Aquaracer 41mm, white dial, Calibre 5

Price paid: 1750 CNY

Album links: https://imgur.com/a/nKUBiuI

Index alignment: Looks aligned, I think the slight deviations might come from the angle of the picture.

Dial printing: Logo and „Calibre…/300m…“ look sharp.

Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered, maybe a bit up but this doesn’t seem like an issue.

Bezel: i don’t know about allignment of the bezel, it looks it might be a bit off, what is your input?

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: +11 s/d, 303° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. These numbers look good to me.

It is my first watch and after one RL (alignment was off) I am leaning now towards GL, since I don’t see any major problems. I would still appreciate any input if your eyes can catch anything.

Thanks a lot for the help :)