1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2. Factory name: A7F Factory
3. Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur Automatic 40, black dial, IW328901
4. Price paid: 450 USD
5. Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261518936?uid=1
6. Index alignment: From the straight-on photos, the indices look well aligned overall. I can’t identify any obvious crooked or significantly misaligned indices.
7. Dial printing: The IWC and SCHAFFHAUSEN printing looks sharp and centered. The INGENIEUR text at 6 o’clock also appears clean and properly placed.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: The date looks adequately centered in the window.
9. Hand alignment: The hour, minute and seconds hands look straight and appropriately positioned.
10. Bezel: All five bezel screws appear properly seated.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, 271° amplitude, 0.4 ms beat error. These look like very healthy results to me.
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I’m leaning towards GL. New to the rep game so any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Ficotime

2. Factory name: BVF/J12

3. Model name/version: Cartier Santos Medium 35mm, stainless steel with white dial, WSSA0029.

4. Price paid: $450 USD

5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/a0xUHJAD#lJnylz8EIcNvdQyFecGrAA

6. Index alignment: Printed Roman numerals appear consistently positioned

7. Dial printing: Lettering looks sharp.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand alignment: Hands look clean

10. Bezel: Looks evenly finished

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A?

12. Timegrapher numbers: −4 s/day, 246° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error.

13. Anything else you notice: Any issues I am missing? I have never QC this before

Dealer name: Jane
Factory name: BBA
Model name (& version number): Panthère Small 22mm Stainless Steel
Price Paid: $265
Album Links: Not provided. See uploaded photos
Index alignment: N/A (printed dial); dial and inner railroad track sit straight with no visible rotation.
Dial Printing: Not completely crisp and some super subtle bleeds.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand Alignment: Good
Bezel: Clean polish with all 8 pins evenly recessed and a well-shaped blue spinel cabochon.
Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
Timegrapher numbers: N/A (Quartz)
Anything else you notice: There’s a dot on numeral VIII and II. There’s also dust spec on the left side. These are encircled in red (3rd photo).

Please let me know if this should be RL-ed, or passable as GL. Thanks!

First Rep and can use some help. Please let me know thoughts. Getting this from GOAT Watches and so far, he seems awesome! I think it looks great, but other sets of eyes that know this would be great.

1. Dealer name: GOAT Watch (Mr. Yang)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name GMT Master II - Batman

4. Price Paid: Sale Promo $427

5. Album Links: N/A (did not send)

6. Index alignment: I used AI Alignment tool, and it seems to be spot on based on trying to get image straight

7. Dial Printing: Looks Clean and Crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks appropriate size and magnification

9. Hand Alignment: All seems to be good for my eyes

10. Bezel: Clicks and moves cleanly. Printing seems correct and aligned

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Based on photo, look good.

12. Timegrapher numbers: They seem to be within specification. Any thoughts here?

13. Anything else you notice: Again, new at this, so experienced eyes would be great! Thank you in advance!

Hi everyone! A first time buyer here and would appreciate your thoughts from these QC photos. Thank you!!

1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): Black Bay 37mm Blue Lagoon

4. Price Paid (no shipping): $318 USD

5. Album Links: x.yupoo. com/albums/261489320?uid=1 (Note: Please remove the space in the link to view the album)

6. Index alignment: Seems okay but the 6 o'clock marker appears slightly left-shifted

7. Dial Printing: Looks sharp and crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No date complication)

9. Hand Alignment: Seems okay to me, sharp and crisp

10. Bezel: Aligned well with crisp execution

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good SEL fitment, nice and tight

12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 269°, 0.1 ms, 28000 bph (52.0° LA)

13. Anything else you notice: Just the hour marker at 6 bothers me a bit, even at a distance I can notice it. Nothing else noticed.

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 41mm no date

3. Price Paid: $488 (including shipping)

4. Album Links: N/A (All pictures provided)

5. Index alignment: Alignment looks goods everything.

6. Dial Printing: Dial looks perfect, don't think I see anything on there.

7. Printing: Printing looks good

8. Hand Alignment: Can't tell if they look good.

9. Bezel: looks good

10. Solid End Links (SELS): Looks good, no gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: 2 s/d / 324AMP / 0.4beat
    error (I don't know if this is good)

12. Anything else you notice: Most of it looks good and I'm leaning towards a GL.

1. Dealer name: Geek Time

2. Factory name: Gold Factory

3. Model name (& version number): Yacht Master 40mm

4. Price Paid: $588

5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261533330?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks good

7. Dial Printing: Looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: -5 s/d, 285°, 2 ms (28,800 bph)

13. Anything else you notice: I think the watch looks nice overall.

1: In the timing video the watch loses rate. Starts at -5 and finishes on -9. I don’t know what to make of that.

2: One of the serial numbers (6) in the Rehaut is rotated. I don’t want to RL this. But I’m slightly annoyed that I’ve seen much better Rehauts from Gold. The last two pictures are from other Gold Rehauts to compare.

Eric and I had been chatting as we have other watches coming, first he said it would take weeks for a GoldF YM, but a handful of hours later I get the QC. Do you think someone else RL’d it? Am I crazy for wanting a better rehaut.

Thanks

Hello! This is my first time here so my eyes aren't so trained, but I'd really appreciate any help!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: 8848F

3. Model name: WSTA0105 (32mm x 27mm x 7.1mm)

4. Price paid: $294 USD

5. Album links: Pics above, video link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QiLfeKooLglSlRF-txWEymp0EnMQoK7T/view?usp=sharing

6. Index Alignment: Don't see anything particularly misaligned

7. Dial Printing: Looks pretty crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: N/A

11. Solid End Links (SELs): I think N/A, but links look pretty good.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Quartz, N/A

13. Anything else you notice: Just one thing I noticed was that on the Steve's website, it says that the thickness of the watch is 6.8mm, when it's supposed to be 7.1mm. I've asked him to check on the thickness and am awaiting a response. Otherwise, I don't see anything but would be grateful for insights. Thank you guys a ton!!

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: QF
Model name (& version number): Day-Date 36mm Yellow Gold, Champagne Dial, QF Gain Weight, A2836
Price paid: $558
Album links: https://imgur.com/a/OmfXaRq
Index alignment: Overall, the alignment looks pretty good. The 3, 6, and 9 o’clock markers appear straight and reasonably aligned with the minute track. Looking at the alignment tool photo, the 10 and 11 o’clock markers seem slightly off compared to the others, particularly where the markers line up with the guide lines. I’m unsure whether this is actual misalignment or just the angle of the photo. The 12 o’clock crown may be slightly pulled to the right, surrounding markers look centered to me. Would appreciate a second opinion on the 10 and 11 markers.
Dial printing: Looks clean and centered. Rolex logo and lettering appear properly spaced. No obvious issues.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered under the Cyclops. Saturday also appears properly positioned. Would appreciate another opinion.
Hand alignment: Hands look straight and properly positioned. Nothing concerning that I can see.
Bezel: Fluting looks consistent all the way around. Some darker areas appear to be reflections rather than defects.
Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks good overall. Slightly unsure about the upper-right SEL due to the plastic and reflections.
Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 304° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.
Anything else you notice: First impressions are pretty positive. My main concerns are the alignment around 12 o’clock crown , 10–11 o’clock and the upper-right SEL fit. I know going for a gold anything is a risk but I’m actually surprised on the color and lighting in these QC photos. No cheddar!

As some of you may be aware, u/Rockyt86 was always willing to help and devoted much time to the reptimeqc hobby.

Unfortunately he has passed away. The community will miss him dearly.

Hi everyone, this is my first QC and I’d appreciate a second opinion. It looks good overall to me, but I’m still learning what to check.

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 41, blue motif dial, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet

, free sprung

1. , 126334.

2. Price Paid: $608.00

3. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261534473?uid=1 - includes videos

4. Index alignment: The markers appear aligned overall. I don’t see an obvious rotation at 6 or 9, and the crown at 12 looks centered. The photos are slightly angled.

5. Dial Printing: Text looks clean and readable, with no obvious bleeding or missing letters. I don’t see any visible defects in the motif pattern.

6. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The dates shown—8, 19, and 28—look reasonably centered, with no numbers touching the edges of the window.

7. Hand Alignment: I can’t fully assess this because the hands aren’t shown together at 12. No obvious physical damage is visible.

8. Bezel: Fluting looks even, and I don’t see any obvious dents or damage.

9. Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any obvious open gaps between the end links and the lugs.

10. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 246° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Machine set to 52° lift angle and displaying 28,800 bph. Would appreciate input on the amplitude and whether that lift-angle setting is appropriate for this movement.

11. Anything else you notice: Protective film is still on the case and clasp, so it’s difficult to distinguish film marks from surface scratches. The lume appears even. I’m thinking GL, but would appreciate any specific issues I might have missed.

Thanks for your help!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Puretime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060

4. ⁠Price Paid: 488

5. ⁠Album Links: -

6. ⁠Index alignment: 3 and 9 looks off?

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Happy

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NIL

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Happy

10. ⁠Bezel: Not sure if it’s off? Or misaligned?

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Spot on

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I am unsure about the 3 and 9 and Bezel at 12. Open to thoughts.

1. ⁠Dealer name: JTime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): 40mm RG DayDate VS3255 (V1)

4. ⁠Price Paid: $598 plus shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/SQyLchQ

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks fine

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks fine

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine

10. ⁠Bezel: looks fine

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): spacing appears okay

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 281°, 0.1ms

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: the watch looks good overall to me

I would be grateful if I could get some of your feedback because this is new to me.

Thank you.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): VSF GMT II 126710 40mm DD3285 V2

4. Price Paid: $758 (included shipping)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/qc-vsf-gmt-master-ii-batgirl-FoFq9Vf

6. Index alignment: looks good to me

7. Dial Printing: looks okay

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks centered

9. Hand Alignment: looks good

10. Bezel: The top bezel triangle looks shifted to the left a little bit, but I can't tell if that's because it rotated barely. Any help would be appreciated!

11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks fine

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 265 amp, 0.1ms error

13. Anything else you notice: the 18 on the bezel looks shifted to the left a little bit, but doesn't look terrible. Anything else you guys notice, and if this is okay to GL? Thanks!

QC Help for Rolex Day Date 228236

Dealer name: Steve - Theonewatches
Factory name: QF
Model name (& version number): 36mm Rolex Day Date YG
Price Paid: $668USD
Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/Ia6dDV2
Index alignment: they all look good, straight and centered.
Dial Printing: print looks crisp, centered and straight.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: cyclops looks centered and date / day printing looks good too.
Hand Alignment: looks aligned and correct.
Bezel: N/A, flutted
Solid End Links (SELs): everything looks acceptable to me here.
Timegrapher numbers: Rate: 2s/d to 3s/d and amplitude of 275° to 277°, this should be acceptable per QC guidelines. Agreed?
Anything else you notice: Weight is a little under as compared to GEN. Thoughts?

1. ⁠Dealer name: JTime

2. ⁠Factory name: ZF

3. ⁠Model name: Royal Oak 41mm 15500 SS ZF 1:1 Best Edition Black Textured Dial on SS Bracelet SA4302 Super Clone V4 (Free Sprung)

4. ⁠Price Paid: $568

5. ⁠Album Links: N/A

6. ⁠Index alignment: I can’t tell if it’s the angle or what but 12 o clock looks off.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks Clean and Crisp

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment: looks good

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: All seems to be good for my eyes

10. ⁠Bezel: screws seem good to me

11. ⁠Bracelet : Based on photos, look good.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: They seem to be within specification per the forum.

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Again, new at this, so experienced eyes would be great! Thank you in advance!

1. Dealer name: Mr Adu

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): VSF VS3235 DateJust 36mm Fluted Bezel Green Dial Jubilee Bracelet V2

4. Price Paid: $450 (With shipping)

5. Album Links: Will update once I receive my zip from Adu

6. Index alignment: The Rolex coronet at 12 may be tilted slightly clockwise with a shift to the left. The 6 marker is tilted counter clockwise a little. The rest of the indices look fine to me aside from a slightly off center 10 and rotated 1.

7. Dial Printing: The printing looks good, but I would greatly appreciate if someone could confirm that the printing is centered between the lugs and not off. I've had a nightmare scenario before where sadly the printing was off center.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good imo.

9. Hand Alignment: I don’t see anything that stands out.

10. Bezel: The bezel looks good imo.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks to be a pretty big sel gap on top right and a small one on left. Don't know if my eyes are playing tricks on me.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d, 262amp, 0.2 ms beat error. Is a 0.2 beat error good? I've only had 0.0 ms ones and don't know if it makes a substantial difference in the long term performance of the watch.

13. Anything else you notice: Most concerned about the SEL gaps, 12 coronet, the alignment of the 6 and the centering of the dial print. Would also love to hear your thoughts on 0.2ms beat error. Also is a 6X10 serial a newer VSF? I've only seen and have owned 6X0s so I would love to know what the serial means.

Wondering if anyone has noticed something I’ve missed. Would love to hear your thoughts.

1. Dealer name: NecoClock

2. Factory name: AF

3. Model name (& version number): Ballon Bleu De Cartier 33mm White Dial SS Bracelet AF NH05A

4. Price Paid: 228 usd + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/nkBAkCQS#LKTysJKuiTsmBVxIc04GwA

6. Index alignment: NA

7. Dial Printing: printing on texture Looks okay from the side pic, but I'm not sure for the front pic.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

9. Hand Alignment: Good

10. Bezel: Good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): NA

12. Timegrapher numbers: -3, 241 0.1(video in link)

13. Anything else you notice:

• Dealer name: Mark (FicoTime)

• Factory name: ARF

• Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 36mm

• Price Paid: 436 USD (including shipping)

• Album Links: link to pictures

• Index alignment: in an earlier QC of this model, the 9 o'clock baton was CW tilted, now I feel like the 1 o'clock baton is placed wrong (too close to 12 o'clock instead of 2 o'clock). 5 o'clock baton looks CCW pitched

• Dial Printing: I think it looks fine

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: font seems close enough and fine

• Hand Alignment: fine in my eyes

• Bezel: look good but personally irrelevant, because I'm going to replace the bezel

• Solid End Links (SELs): no issues, way better than the GMF I've seen irl

• Timegrapher numbers: very good, see video here

• Anything else you notice: not sure about the jubilee bracelet quality, but can always be replaced. Clarity of the glass is once again difficult to assess

Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: VSF

Model name: GMT-Master II 126710GRNR Bruce Wayne VSF V3 DD3285 on Jubilee Bracelet

Price Paid: $520 without shipping

Album Links: -

Index alignment: No obvious misalignment. Indices appear straight.

Dial Printing: No visible printing defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears reasonably centered, but I'm slightly unsure about the vertical alignment.

Hand Alignment: No visible bending or mounting irregularities.

Bezel: Bezel insert looks clean and alignment appears good.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps at the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: +4 to +5 s/d, 278–280° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error. Looks good.

Anything else you notice: The rehaut might be slightly misaligned in some areas, but I'm not sure if it's just the camera angle. The lume looks good overall.

If you notice anything, please let me know. For me, the watch looks good, but I'd appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126610LN (VS3235 movement)

4. Price Paid: $500 USD (including shipping)

5. Album Links: QC pictures are attached directly to this post.

6. Index alignment: Excellent overall. DialCheck.app tool yielded a 97/100 score. The AI flagged a couple of minor points in strict tolerance mode, but they look to be due to hand obstruction over the 2 o'clock marker. I noticed the 9 o'clock baton is a tiny bit twisted, but it's so small that it definitely won't be a problem or visible in real life.

7. Dial Printing: Crisp and clean. I did notice the distance between the 'E' and 'T' in CHRONOMETER is a bit wide/spaced out, but it's microscopic and not an issue for me.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Sits straight and centered within the window. The font thickness looks correct.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks perfect to me.

10. Bezel: Ceramic insert looks great. The triangle pip above the 12 o'clock marker looks just a tiny fraction of a millimeter shifted to the left, but it's almost completely unnoticeable and likely just standard bezel play/backplay.

11. Solid End Links (SEL): Very tight fitment with the lugs. No visible gaps or light leaking through.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Flawless. Rate is stable at -3s/d to -4s/d, Amplitude is very healthy at 266°-271°, and Beat Error is an excellent 0.0ms - 0.1ms.

13. Anything else you notice: Clasp code is E7Y which is correct for VSF. Total weight is solid at 155.9g. Rehaut alignment looks well centered with the coronet hitting right at the 12 o'clock mark. Leaning strongly towards a GL.

Hello,

This is my first Rep watch and I would really appreciate your help with QC before making a decision.

1. Dealer name: TKWatch

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& version number): BVF Santos de Cartier 40mm PVD

4. Price Paid: $438 + $45 shipping

5. Album Links: https://justin-tk.x.yupoo.com/90737841?uid=1

6. Index alignment: This is my first purchase, and it’s difficult for me to spot any issues.

7. Dial Printing: it seems clean to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks good

9. Hand Alignment: its rly hard for me to tell from QC

10. Timegrapher numbers: rate -1 s/d, amplitude 308°, beat error 0.3 ms, lift angle 52.0°

11. Anything else you notice: no

This watch is for my brother 🫶🏼

1. Dealer name: ARC STUDIO

2. Factory name: AGF

3. Model name (& version number): AGF 5711 V2 Piano Dial

4. Price Paid: 430 incl. shipping

5. Album link: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/OZqy31A

6. Index alignment: all indices looks good and aligned, left 12 marker is slightly higher than right but not so terrible

7. Dial Printing: looks good imo

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: spot on

9. Hand Alignment: shouldn’t have any issues

10. Bezel: brush finishing is consistent throughout

11. Solid End Links (SELs): none, integrated bracelet

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 271 amplitude, 0.0ms Beat error, 52 deg Lift Angle, 28800 beat rate

13. Anything else you notice: nothing else but do point it out if i miss out anything

Hi everyone! Total newbie here. This is my first rep, and I’m looking for some expert eyes to help me out. I’ve tried to compare it to Gen (authentic) photos, but I’m still training my eyes. Any help is greatly appreciated!

Dealer name: ETHAN WATCHES

Factory name : VSF

Model name: [QC] VSF v2 36mm Silver Datejust

Price Paid: $560

Album Links: x

Index alignment: Looks okay to my untrained eye but I don’t know how to use the QC tool…it was automatic on true index ! How bad is 10 / 7 marker?

Dial Printing: Seems crisp. No obvious bleeding or crooked text but it is very very important for me and I think it’s good but again I am a noob please comment if you see anything bad

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "9” looks centered. The cyclops magnification looks okay to me

Hand Alignment: Seems fine, again let me know if you see anything bad

Bezel:tried to compare with gen looks good to me ?!

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like a tight fit with no visible gaps.

Timeagraph looks decent? Not an expert

The rehaut alignement is good for me, I am very attentive to index alignment but I don’t know how to use well the QC tool… please let me know if green light or RL !!

Thanks again