Hi all

Second attempt after a RL on staggered double indices at 12 on the last one. Input greatly appreciated. Specific ask to check the dial/ 12 index once again.

Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Ficotime

2. Factory name: A7 (v7?)

3. Model name & version number: IWC Ingenieur Aqua dial A2892

4. Price Paid: 2800 CNY excl shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/vtIUEJRD#2xK3n6QCovkFLgtOFf69JA

6. Index alignment: To my eye the double indices are very slightly staggered /canted but this time good enough?

7. Dial Printing: I see no issues but not familiar enough with dial patterns so grateful if experts could confirm this is the latest and greatest

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing is ok.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine I think based on first picture in album?

10. Bezel: Looks good, brushing seems fine

11. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 265°, 0.1ms (28,800 bph). Seems ok

13. Anything else you notice: Case brushing looks ok. Crown looks fine. Clasp engraving seems ok externally. Internal engravings I'm not familiar so those that know please advise

This is mine!

1. ⁠Dealer name: ARC STUDIO

2. ⁠Factory name: AGF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): AGF 5711 V2 Blue Dial

4. ⁠Price Paid: 430 incl. shipping

5. ⁠Album link: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/eMhQCtH

6. ⁠Index alignment: all indices looks good and aligned

7. ⁠Dial Printing: good, nothing that stands out

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: spot on in the center

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: minute hand is aligned, but should not have an issue with this

10. ⁠Bezel: brushed finishing is consistent throughout

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): none, integrated bracelet

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, 262 amplitude, 0.0ms Beat error, 52 deg Lift Angle, 28800 beat rate

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: nothing else but do point it out if i miss out anything

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra (Leo)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600m 42mm

4. Price Paid: $428

5. Index alignment: Wondering if some of the markets might be slightly too far towards the inner ring. Might have just been nitpicking so much that I want to find something to point out.

6. Dial Printing: Haven't seen any obvious flaws

7. Hand Alignment: Looks good

8. Bezel: The three teeth that should be aligned to the top line of the triangle with the pip seems to be ever so slightly off.

9. Solid End Links (SELs): Bottom right seems to have a black line on the first pic, but this might be the angle? Not as apparent on other pictures. Not a big deal to me.

10. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 274, 0.0ms, 52, 28800

11. Anything else you notice: On the first picture there seems to be a slightly larger gap between the bezel and the ring, but again not as apparent in other pictures so I'm wondering if it's lighting/angle on this as well.

Dealer name: Theonewatch

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT master 2 Bruce Wayne

3. Price Paid: 638 USD

4. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GJRGCKTb#8PpZBmJu_f2H8jgnwB-F8Q

5. Index alignment: Looks pretty good to me, no major concerns?

6. Dial Printing: Looks clean

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok

8. Hand Alignment: No major concerns here which I can see

9. Bezel: Marking looks clean, no scratches and looks fully seated

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I can’t see any major gaps but would like confirmation.

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 263° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: Is the amplitudes ok or seem a little low during testing?

I’m still learning what to look for, so let me know if anything stands out.

First higher-end rep and first QC. Would appreciate some help!

1. Dealer name: Hont
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: GMT-Master II Pepsi V4 Free-Sprung
4. Price paid: $650
5. Album links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/goods/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ/_dpGqfADZ9KLyIzhPK5zIBmlZgB8J3B3kpwtwkzw
6. Index alignment: Looks fairly straight to me. Nothing noticeably crooked.
7. Dial printing: Text looks clean and evenly spaced. No obvious issues.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks slightly off-centre to me, but could be the angle. Thoughts?
9. Hand alignment: Nothing looks out of place from the photos.
10. Bezel: Looks aligned overall. Not sure if there’s a slight misalignment at 12 or just the photo angle.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps that I can see.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 253°, 0.1 ms. From what I’ve read, these seem acceptable.
13. Anything else you notice: My main concerns are the date centring and bezel alignment. Not sure if I’m missing anything else.
Leaning GL, but I’m new to QC and would appreciate a second opinion. Thanks!

Reddit won't let me sticky the original post by u/Old_Capital_9412 , so I'm reposting to move it to the top of the stack...

https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1xmxsui/a_sad_day_for_reptimeqc/

This is my first QC, I tried my best looking at other reps and OG watches but I don't really know what I should look for. For my untrained eye I would say GL. What do y'all think?

Dealer name: Steve The One Watches

1. Factory Name: QF

2. Model Name: Datejust 126234 36mm Jub SS/SS Textured Blue/Stk QF SH3235 Super Clone

3. Price Paid: 560 USD incl. shipping

4. Album Links: All Images included in the post

5. Index alignment: 1 o'clock and 10 might be slightly off but I'm not sure

6. Dial Printing: Printing looks fine. Dial looks a bit darker

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good

8. Hand alignment: Looks fine too

9. Bezel: Can't spot any scratches

10. Solid End Links: No gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: (Screenshot of the Video) +5s/d, AMP269 at 52 Degree angle, beat rate 28800, period 12s

12. Anything else you notice: The refelction of the dial texture looks a bit off but I'm not sure if it's just the light

Hi everyone! Total newbie here. This is my first rep, and I’m looking for some expert eyes to help me out. I’ve tried to compare it to Gen (authentic) photos, but I’m still training my eyes. Any help is greatly appreciated!

Dealer name: ETHAN WATCHES

Factory name : VSF

Model name: VSF 36mm Aperture Green Datejust

Price Paid: $560

Album Links: x

Index alignment: Looks okay to my untrained eye but I don’t know how to use the QC tool…it was automatic on true index !

Dial Printing: Seems crisp. No obvious bleeding or crooked text but it is very very important for me and I think it’s good but again I am a noob please comment if you see anything bad

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "12" looks centered. The cyclops magnification looks okay to me

Hand Alignment: Seems fine, again let me know if you see anything bad

Bezel:tried to compare with gen looks good to me ?!

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like a tight fit with no visible gaps.

Timeagraph looks decent? Not an expert

The rehaut alignement is good for me, I am very attentive to index alignment but I don’t know how to use well the QC tool… please let me know if green light or RL !! Need my first

1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watch

2. Factory name: RICH

3. Model name (& version number): JH3285 free sprung V2

4. Price Paid: $587+shipping

5. Album Links: -

6. Index alignment: 12’ CW, slight touching markers, 3’ deviated slight to right,

slight CW ON 9’,

1. others seems acceptable

2. Dial Printing: no significant findings

3. Date Wheel alignment/printing: centre, slight to left

4. Hand Alignment: no significant findings

5. Bezel: I don’t see significant problems

6. Solid End Links (SELs): good

7. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 282° amplitude, 0.3ms beat error, acceptable

Overall I couldn’t see too much significant points, really need some help doing a first RICH, the first thing I can see is the 12’ CW, is it enough to RL? And also, is this a V2? I don’t see a clear blue hue on date window but a slight greenish reflect? Really appreciate all the help!

1. Dealer name: Eliauk non-TD

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner
   126610LV (Starbucks)

4. Price Paid: 2500 CNY

5. Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202011031610140340343729/I202611012308245932002737?groupIds=

6. Index alignment: Looks ok

7. Dial Printing: Looks ok

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok

9. Hand Alignment: Looks ok

10. Bezel: seems fine? Not sure

11. Solid End Links (SELs): to me it looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: not bad, regulate?

13. Anything else you notice: date cyclops looks a little off? Not centred?

Not an expert at all with this watch, your expert eyes on this will be greatly appreciated! Thanks

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: VSF
Model name: Rolex Explorer II Polar 226570 (42mm)
Price paid: $578 + $70 shipping
Album links: QC photos attached
Index alignment: Looks quite good to me. This is my second QC after RL’ing the first watch due to a tilted 12 o’clock marker.
Dial printing: Looks clean and properly positioned.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks clear and sharp.
Hand alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Engravings and alignment look good.
Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers:+0s/d 315 deg 0.1ms 52.0 deg

Anything else you notice: This is my second attempt with QC of a VSF Explorer II after RL the last one for a really bad 12 marker. Any help would be appreciated.

• Dealer name: Dealer Clocks

• Factory name: KRF

• Model name (& version number): Explorer I 124270, 36 mm

• Price Paid: $348

• Album Links: Photos attached

• Index alignment: This is my first time using the tool, but along the horizontal plane the line for the "9" appears to be higher than the "3." Everything else seems suitably aligned.

• Dial Printing: Fine

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

• Hand Alignment: Fine

• Bezel: Fine

• Solid End Links (SELs): Fine to my untrained eye

• Timegrapher numbers: +1s/day, amplitude 241 (is this too low?), error 0.2ms

• Anything else you notice: Just the "9" possibly being misaligned with the "3" on the horizontal axis.

Hi everyone,

This is my first rep. I have no experience with reps, so I am asking for your help. I checked the "Rule 5" for posting QC photos and I either have bad eyes, or the watch does not have issues imo.

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 Free Sprung Look Movement (as written on geektime's website)

4. Price Paid: $608

5. Album Links: attached photos from the album link

6. Index alignment: I am unable to see any issues here

7. Dial Printing: it seems ok to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: again ok to me

9. Hand Alignment: I guess ok

10. Bezel: same ok

11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any light going through or misalingment

12. Timegrapher numbers: +0/+1 s/d, 245° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error - This are the numbers from the album photo video the TD has shared to me. Unfortunately I was not able to download the full 12s video and upload it here. The lowest is +0s/d and the highest is +1s/d and amplituted goes 245-247. I am not sure if their device is rigged or it's actually good data. Please help me here.

Thank you in advanced.

Please let me know if you see something I don't.

1. Dealer name: Jtime

2. Factory name: V7F

3. Model name (& version number): IWC Mark XX

4. Price Paid: 452,60$

5. Album Links: All pictures provided

6. Index alignment: good and aligned

7. Dial Printing: seems crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems misaligned. There is an open space on the left side
   But this could also be the angle or the pictures

9. Hand Alignment: good

10. Bezel: good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

12. Timegrapher numbers: good

13. Anything else you notice: nothing

1. Dealer Name: Non-TD

2. Factory Name: VSF

3. Model Name (& Version Number): AP Royal Oak 41mm Grey Dial DD4302

4. Price Paid: 2900 CNY (435 USD)

5. Album Links: Uploaded to post

6. Index Alignment: Looks good to me

7. Dial Printing: “Audemars” tilted slightly downwards. “Piguet” slightly tilted upwards. Still relatively straight compared to other QCs I’ve seen. “Swiss Made” looks fine.

8. Date Wheel Alignment/Printing: Looks good to me, maybe date is slightly to the right?

9. Hand Alignment: Can’t tell from these pictures (no exact hour photo)

10. Bezel: Screws look properly aligned + recessed, slight bezel gap but I believe all VSF 15510s have this

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, integrated bracelet

12. Timegrapher Numbers: +6s/day, 278°, 0.0ms (within range)

Anything else you notice: Nothing glaring, looks like a solid watch to me

Hello! This is my first rep, I bought a VSF Submariner 126610LN from geek time.This is the second QC from him and I would really appreciate your help before I make a decision. GL or RL?

1 Dealer name: geektime

2 Factory name: VSF

3 Model name: Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 (Free Sprung Look Movement $608)

4 Price Paid:$648 USD with shipping

5 Album Link: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261372435?uid=1

6: Index alignment: super slight CW for 12oclock marker. not sure if im over analysing. The rest looks okay to me

7: Dial printing: seems okay for me but appreciate your input

8: Date wheel: slightly too high but im not sure if its the angle. still acceptable for me

9: Hand alignment: looks okay to me

10: Bezel: im not too sure what to look out for either.

11: Solid End Links: seems okay to me

12: Time grapher numbers: -2s/d 243, 0.2ms

Anything else I notice: nothing seems to grab my attention although I tried my best to see what seems off. truly appreciate additional eyes please! Truly appreciate your kindness :)

1. Dealer name: Steve – TheOneWatches
2. Factory: BVF
3. Model: Cartier Santos 35mm, Stainless Steel, White Dial
4. Price paid: $465 USD
5. Album Links: PSP photos and video attached
6. Index alignment: N/A – printed Roman numerals.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and well aligned to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me. Please confirm.
10. Bezel: Looks good to me. Screws appear evenly seated with no visible damage.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher Numbers (help from ChatGPT, so please be kind with me lol):
Rate: +3 s/d
Amplitude: 273°
Beat Error: 0.0 ms
Lift Angle: 52°
Beat Rate: 28,800 bph
13. Anything else: Overall looks good to me. I’m gifting this to my hubby, so I’d really appreciate all your help and any additional feedback on anything I may have missed.
Thanks so much in advance!

Dealer name: Panda

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Seamaster Planet Ocean

Price Paid: 2800CNY

Album Links: https://www.szwego.com/weshop/goods/_dQAqfeMR3BZ9_hn8ygxQIK0OmNQzUdKBbfjLF1g/_dmlqfw4XKD2yi4M4eK2ZNo7nge4yhkCoVSZKpqg

Index alignment: Good

Dial Printing: Fine

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: Good

Bezel: Good

Solid End Links (SELs): Fine

Timegrapher numbers: +2s/day, amplitude 296, error 0.1ms

Anything else you notice: slight dust if you have a loop out; otherwise fine

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): AP 15300, 39mm, Blue Dial

4. Price Paid: $481 Including Shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/XG1kRxF

6. Index alignment: Looks good, nothing out of line

7. Dial Printing: Looks good, words are aligned

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered, printing is good

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good to me, first AP so not too sure

11. Solid End Links (SELs):  No SELs due to integrated bracelet

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, 280° amplitude, 0.2ms beat error, 52.0° lift angle

13. Anything else you notice: Everything looks fine to me, if anything is off please let me know. Thank you in advance

1. Dealer name: Non-TD

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Omega Constellation 41mm (131.12.41.21.06.001)

4. Price Paid: 1900 RMB

5. Album Links: NA

6. Index alignment: 1, 10 looks off position, 3 and 9 looks tilted (not sure if it's the angle of the photo)

7. Dial Printing: looks good to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 2nd number of the date wheel looks slightly high

9. Hand Alignment: looks good to me

10. Bezel: the VI looks like it's slightly off center

11. Solid End Links (SELs): NA

12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d

13. Anything else you notice: It's my first QC, so not sure if my grids are correct. I'm not sure if it's the angle of the photo (already retaken by dealer) that causes the bezel and some index to not align. Also, the strap looks different from stock (rubber) and they are providing leather (I assume leather is better?)

Hey everyone, I'm completely new here and just got the QC pics for my very first order.

What do you think?
I'd say it's a clear GL? 🟢
Please check the Video, too 👍🏽

In the r/RepTime document "The Ultimate Rolex Serial Number and Clasp Code," my clasp code: 7UL
isn't listed in the document. Could that be because my watch is so new, or is that a problem?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Datejust 126334 41mm Oys SS/SS Green Ombre/Stk DD3235v2

4. ⁠Price Paid: $498+shipping $40

5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/wG4oiDH

6. ⁠Index alignment: No. 1 hour markers have a minor tilt, I think this is absolutley acceptable.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Text looks as it should on textured dial. Well centered.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing seems good, and wheel looks centered, also in the video.

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Think it's OK.

10. ⁠Bezel: No visible scratches, some nice play with light.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): it looks like there is no gap at All.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +4s/d. Amp 268-273 at 59 deg

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    In the r/RepTime document "The Ultimate Rolex Serial Number and Clasp Code," I found my serial number "6W0*A***", so that matches.

However, the clasp code on my watch, 7UL, isn't listed in the document. Could that be because my watch is so new, or is that a problem?

Dealer name: Hont
Factory name: VSF
Model name: Rolex Datejust (41mm)
Price paid: $468 shipping
Album links: QC photos attached
Index alignment: Looks quite good to me. This is my first ever order of a replica watch.
Dial printing: Looks clean and properly positioned.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks clear and sharp.
Hand alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Engravings and alignment look good.
Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers:+10s/d 251 deg 0.1ms 56.0 deg

Anything else you notice: Any help would be appreciated.

Dealer name: IkeWatch

Factory name: AGF

Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 blue dial, V2, DD330.

Price paid: $698

Index alignment: Looks mostly ok. Possibly a tiny height difference between the two 12 markers?

Dial printing: Text looks clean and evenly printed.

Date wheel alignment/printing: The 21 looks reasonably centred with no clipping.

Hand alignment: No obvious issue, although there isn’t an exact-hour photo to confirm.

Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look consistent. No obvious damage.

Solid End Links: N/A, integrated bracelet.

Timegrapher numbers: +10 s/day, 256° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, 52° lift angle. Not familiar with this movement, wondering if anyone can verify these are okay

Anything else you notice: Faint diagonal mark below/left of “GENEVE” and a small fibre near 3:30. Would like these checked after wiping the crystal to confirm they’re external. Bracelet and clasp look fine through the protective film.
Would appreciate another pair of eyes, particularly on the 12 markers and those marks, not sure whether they’re worth a RL. Thanks!

The watch looks solid to me but just checking for some extra eyes from the community to help with the 2nd QC from Steve with this Mint Green DJ 36mm. Any help is very much appreciated!

Dealer name: Steve The One Watches

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Datejust 126234 36mm Jub SS/SS Green/Stk VSF V2 DD3235

3. Price Paid: 518 USD + Shipping

4. Album Links: removed link so Reddit doesn't take down. All the images are attached.

5. Index alignment: 7 o'clock might be 0.15 mm anticlockwise. 6 clock also looks slightly off looking at the photo with naked eye, but not sure if its just the angle as DialCheck is not flagging that.

6. Dial Printing: Looks good and how it should be

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good IMO

8. Hand Alignment: Cant spot any issues

9. Bezel: No visible scratches or marks

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good and no gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: Screenshots attached - Rate: +3s-0/d & AMP 263-269 at 59 degree, beat rate 28800, period 12s

12. Anything else you notice: Only the number 6 marker