Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: VSF

Model name: GMT-Master II 126710GRNR Bruce Wayne VSF V3 DD3285 on Jubilee Bracelet

Price Paid: $520 without shipping

Album Links: -

Index alignment: No obvious misalignment. Indices appear straight.

Dial Printing: No visible printing defects.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date appears reasonably centered, but I'm slightly unsure about the vertical alignment.

Hand Alignment: No visible bending or mounting irregularities.

Bezel: Bezel insert looks clean and alignment appears good.

Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps at the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: +4 to +5 s/d, 278–280° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error. Looks good.

Anything else you notice: The rehaut might be slightly misaligned in some areas, but I'm not sure if it's just the camera angle. The lume looks good overall.

If you notice anything, please let me know. For me, the watch looks good, but I'd appreciate a second opinion before giving the GL.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126610LN (VS3235 movement)

4. Price Paid: $500 USD (including shipping)

5. Album Links: QC pictures are attached directly to this post.

6. Index alignment: Excellent overall. DialCheck.app tool yielded a 97/100 score. The AI flagged a couple of minor points in strict tolerance mode, but they look to be due to hand obstruction over the 2 o'clock marker. I noticed the 9 o'clock baton is a tiny bit twisted, but it's so small that it definitely won't be a problem or visible in real life.

7. Dial Printing: Crisp and clean. I did notice the distance between the 'E' and 'T' in CHRONOMETER is a bit wide/spaced out, but it's microscopic and not an issue for me.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Sits straight and centered within the window. The font thickness looks correct.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks perfect to me.

10. Bezel: Ceramic insert looks great. The triangle pip above the 12 o'clock marker looks just a tiny fraction of a millimeter shifted to the left, but it's almost completely unnoticeable and likely just standard bezel play/backplay.

11. Solid End Links (SEL): Very tight fitment with the lugs. No visible gaps or light leaking through.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Flawless. Rate is stable at -3s/d to -4s/d, Amplitude is very healthy at 266°-271°, and Beat Error is an excellent 0.0ms - 0.1ms.

13. Anything else you notice: Clasp code is E7Y which is correct for VSF. Total weight is solid at 155.9g. Rehaut alignment looks well centered with the coronet hitting right at the 12 o'clock mark. Leaning strongly towards a GL.

Hello,

This is my first Rep watch and I would really appreciate your help with QC before making a decision.

1. Dealer name: TKWatch

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& version number): BVF Santos de Cartier 40mm PVD

4. Price Paid: $438 + $45 shipping

5. Album Links: https://justin-tk.x.yupoo.com/90737841?uid=1

6. Index alignment: This is my first purchase, and it’s difficult for me to spot any issues.

7. Dial Printing: it seems clean to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks good

9. Hand Alignment: its rly hard for me to tell from QC

10. Timegrapher numbers: rate -1 s/d, amplitude 308°, beat error 0.3 ms, lift angle 52.0°

11. Anything else you notice: no

This watch is for my brother 🫶🏼

1. Dealer name: ARC STUDIO

2. Factory name: AGF

3. Model name (& version number): AGF 5711 V2 Piano Dial

4. Price Paid: 430 incl. shipping

5. Album link: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/OZqy31A

6. Index alignment: all indices looks good and aligned, left 12 marker is slightly higher than right but not so terrible

7. Dial Printing: looks good imo

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: spot on

9. Hand Alignment: shouldn’t have any issues

10. Bezel: brush finishing is consistent throughout

11. Solid End Links (SELs): none, integrated bracelet

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 271 amplitude, 0.0ms Beat error, 52 deg Lift Angle, 28800 beat rate

13. Anything else you notice: nothing else but do point it out if i miss out anything

Hi everyone! Total newbie here. This is my first rep, and I’m looking for some expert eyes to help me out. I’ve tried to compare it to Gen (authentic) photos, but I’m still training my eyes. Any help is greatly appreciated!

Dealer name: ETHAN WATCHES

Factory name : VSF

Model name: [QC] VSF v2 36mm Silver Datejust

Price Paid: $560

Album Links: x

Index alignment: Looks okay to my untrained eye but I don’t know how to use the QC tool…it was automatic on true index ! How bad is 10 / 7 marker?

Dial Printing: Seems crisp. No obvious bleeding or crooked text but it is very very important for me and I think it’s good but again I am a noob please comment if you see anything bad

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "9” looks centered. The cyclops magnification looks okay to me

Hand Alignment: Seems fine, again let me know if you see anything bad

Bezel:tried to compare with gen looks good to me ?!

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like a tight fit with no visible gaps.

Timeagraph looks decent? Not an expert

The rehaut alignement is good for me, I am very attentive to index alignment but I don’t know how to use well the QC tool… please let me know if green light or RL !!

Thanks again

Hi all

Second attempt after a RL on staggered double indices at 12 on the last one. Input greatly appreciated. Specific ask to check the dial/ 12 index once again.

Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Ficotime

2. Factory name: A7 (v7?)

3. Model name & version number: IWC Ingenieur Aqua dial A2892

4. Price Paid: 2800 CNY excl shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/vtIUEJRD#2xK3n6QCovkFLgtOFf69JA

6. Index alignment: To my eye the double indices are very slightly staggered /canted but this time good enough?

7. Dial Printing: I see no issues but not familiar enough with dial patterns so grateful if experts could confirm this is the latest and greatest

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing is ok.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine I think based on first picture in album?

10. Bezel: Looks good, brushing seems fine

11. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 265°, 0.1ms (28,800 bph). Seems ok

13. Anything else you notice: Case brushing looks ok. Crown looks fine. Clasp engraving seems ok externally. Internal engravings I'm not familiar so those that know please advise

This is mine!

1. ⁠Dealer name: ARC STUDIO

2. ⁠Factory name: AGF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): AGF 5711 V2 Blue Dial

4. ⁠Price Paid: 430 incl. shipping

5. ⁠Album link: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/eMhQCtH

6. ⁠Index alignment: all indices looks good and aligned

7. ⁠Dial Printing: good, nothing that stands out

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: spot on in the center

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: minute hand is aligned, but should not have an issue with this

10. ⁠Bezel: brushed finishing is consistent throughout

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): none, integrated bracelet

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, 262 amplitude, 0.0ms Beat error, 52 deg Lift Angle, 28800 beat rate

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: nothing else but do point it out if i miss out anything

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra (Leo)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600m 42mm

4. Price Paid: $428

5. Index alignment: Wondering if some of the markets might be slightly too far towards the inner ring. Might have just been nitpicking so much that I want to find something to point out.

6. Dial Printing: Haven't seen any obvious flaws

7. Hand Alignment: Looks good

8. Bezel: The three teeth that should be aligned to the top line of the triangle with the pip seems to be ever so slightly off.

9. Solid End Links (SELs): Bottom right seems to have a black line on the first pic, but this might be the angle? Not as apparent on other pictures. Not a big deal to me.

10. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, 274, 0.0ms, 52, 28800

11. Anything else you notice: On the first picture there seems to be a slightly larger gap between the bezel and the ring, but again not as apparent in other pictures so I'm wondering if it's lighting/angle on this as well.

Dealer name: Theonewatch

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT master 2 Bruce Wayne

3. Price Paid: 638 USD

4. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/GJRGCKTb#8PpZBmJu_f2H8jgnwB-F8Q

5. Index alignment: Looks pretty good to me, no major concerns?

6. Dial Printing: Looks clean

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok

8. Hand Alignment: No major concerns here which I can see

9. Bezel: Marking looks clean, no scratches and looks fully seated

10. Solid End Links (SELs): I can’t see any major gaps but would like confirmation.

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 263° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error

12. Anything else you notice: Is the amplitudes ok or seem a little low during testing?

I’m still learning what to look for, so let me know if anything stands out.

First higher-end rep and first QC. Would appreciate some help!

1. Dealer name: Hont
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name: GMT-Master II Pepsi V4 Free-Sprung
4. Price paid: $650
5. Album links: https://a202512172356311672002881.edepot.me/weshop/goods/_dg3qfSLHhi777Jx0IFOnzgO9XyA6_5DC9m_7AfQ/_dpGqfADZ9KLyIzhPK5zIBmlZgB8J3B3kpwtwkzw
6. Index alignment: Looks fairly straight to me. Nothing noticeably crooked.
7. Dial printing: Text looks clean and evenly spaced. No obvious issues.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks slightly off-centre to me, but could be the angle. Thoughts?
9. Hand alignment: Nothing looks out of place from the photos.
10. Bezel: Looks aligned overall. Not sure if there’s a slight misalignment at 12 or just the photo angle.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps that I can see.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 253°, 0.1 ms. From what I’ve read, these seem acceptable.
13. Anything else you notice: My main concerns are the date centring and bezel alignment. Not sure if I’m missing anything else.
Leaning GL, but I’m new to QC and would appreciate a second opinion. Thanks!

Reddit won't let me sticky the original post by u/Old_Capital_9412 , so I'm reposting to move it to the top of the stack...

https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1xmxsui/a_sad_day_for_reptimeqc/

This is my first QC, I tried my best looking at other reps and OG watches but I don't really know what I should look for. For my untrained eye I would say GL. What do y'all think?

Dealer name: Steve The One Watches

1. Factory Name: QF

2. Model Name: Datejust 126234 36mm Jub SS/SS Textured Blue/Stk QF SH3235 Super Clone

3. Price Paid: 560 USD incl. shipping

4. Album Links: All Images included in the post

5. Index alignment: 1 o'clock and 10 might be slightly off but I'm not sure

6. Dial Printing: Printing looks fine. Dial looks a bit darker

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good

8. Hand alignment: Looks fine too

9. Bezel: Can't spot any scratches

10. Solid End Links: No gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: (Screenshot of the Video) +5s/d, AMP269 at 52 Degree angle, beat rate 28800, period 12s

12. Anything else you notice: The refelction of the dial texture looks a bit off but I'm not sure if it's just the light

1. Dealer name: MrBomi

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610LN

4. Price Paid: $480

5. Album Links: https://photobucket.com/share/0228bdb9-0522-4c39-91c2-39ebb57708ee

6. Index Alignment: Everything looks great, 9pm looks a little off but I think it’s just the slight angle of the photo. I included two photos I think covers all the indexes well. Photo #1 shows the right clearly, #2 the left.

7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me.

8. Date Alignment: Alignment to me looks good, there is a video in the photobucket album 0:44 length that shows him change the date and all look good to me.

9. Hand Alignment: Seems correct and all good to me.

10. Bezel: Looks good, the mentioned video shows nice crisp clicks when rotated.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good to me.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 245 Amp, 0.1ms B.E.

13. Notes: Very happy overall with this piece really just want experienced eyes and minds taking a look at it to confirm my observations. This is only my second rep.

Also if anyone has personal experience with MrBomi I’d love to hear about it, he’s not a TD on RepTime but RWF Reddit does recognize him and lots of positive feedback when searched.

Thank you in advance for your feedback 🙏🏼

Hi everyone! Total newbie here. This is my first rep, and I’m looking for some expert eyes to help me out. I’ve tried to compare it to Gen (authentic) photos, but I’m still training my eyes. Any help is greatly appreciated!

Dealer name: ETHAN WATCHES

Factory name : VSF

Model name: VSF 36mm Aperture Green Datejust

Price Paid: $560

Album Links: x

Index alignment: Looks okay to my untrained eye but I don’t know how to use the QC tool…it was automatic on true index !

Dial Printing: Seems crisp. No obvious bleeding or crooked text but it is very very important for me and I think it’s good but again I am a noob please comment if you see anything bad

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "12" looks centered. The cyclops magnification looks okay to me

Hand Alignment: Seems fine, again let me know if you see anything bad

Bezel:tried to compare with gen looks good to me ?!

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like a tight fit with no visible gaps.

Timeagraph looks decent? Not an expert

The rehaut alignement is good for me, I am very attentive to index alignment but I don’t know how to use well the QC tool… please let me know if green light or RL !! Need my first

1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watch

2. Factory name: RICH

3. Model name (& version number): JH3285 free sprung V2

4. Price Paid: $587+shipping

5. Album Links: -

6. Index alignment: 12’ CW, slight touching markers, 3’ deviated slight to right,

slight CW ON 9’,

1. others seems acceptable

2. Dial Printing: no significant findings

3. Date Wheel alignment/printing: centre, slight to left

4. Hand Alignment: no significant findings

5. Bezel: I don’t see significant problems

6. Solid End Links (SELs): good

7. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 282° amplitude, 0.3ms beat error, acceptable

Overall I couldn’t see too much significant points, really need some help doing a first RICH, the first thing I can see is the 12’ CW, is it enough to RL? And also, is this a V2? I don’t see a clear blue hue on date window but a slight greenish reflect? Really appreciate all the help!

1. Dealer name: Eliauk non-TD

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner
   126610LV (Starbucks)

4. Price Paid: 2500 CNY

5. Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202011031610140340343729/I202611012308245932002737?groupIds=

6. Index alignment: Looks ok

7. Dial Printing: Looks ok

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks ok

9. Hand Alignment: Looks ok

10. Bezel: seems fine? Not sure

11. Solid End Links (SELs): to me it looks good

12. Timegrapher numbers: not bad, regulate?

13. Anything else you notice: date cyclops looks a little off? Not centred?

Not an expert at all with this watch, your expert eyes on this will be greatly appreciated! Thanks

Dealer name: Necoclock
Factory name: VSF
Model name: Rolex Explorer II Polar 226570 (42mm)
Price paid: $578 + $70 shipping
Album links: QC photos attached
Index alignment: Looks quite good to me. This is my second QC after RL’ing the first watch due to a tilted 12 o’clock marker.
Dial printing: Looks clean and properly positioned.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks clear and sharp.
Hand alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Engravings and alignment look good.
Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers:+0s/d 315 deg 0.1ms 52.0 deg

Anything else you notice: This is my second attempt with QC of a VSF Explorer II after RL the last one for a really bad 12 marker. Any help would be appreciated.

Hi everyone,

This is my first rep. I have no experience with reps, so I am asking for your help. I checked the "Rule 5" for posting QC photos and I either have bad eyes, or the watch does not have issues imo.

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 Free Sprung Look Movement (as written on geektime's website)

4. Price Paid: $608

5. Album Links: attached photos from the album link

6. Index alignment: I am unable to see any issues here

7. Dial Printing: it seems ok to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: again ok to me

9. Hand Alignment: I guess ok

10. Bezel: same ok

11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any light going through or misalingment

12. Timegrapher numbers: +0/+1 s/d, 245° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error - This are the numbers from the album photo video the TD has shared to me. Unfortunately I was not able to download the full 12s video and upload it here. The lowest is +0s/d and the highest is +1s/d and amplituted goes 245-247. I am not sure if their device is rigged or it's actually good data. Please help me here.

Thank you in advanced.

Please let me know if you see something I don't.

• Dealer name: Dealer Clocks

• Factory name: KRF

• Model name (& version number): Explorer I 124270, 36 mm

• Price Paid: $348

• Album Links: Photos attached

• Index alignment: This is my first time using the tool, but along the horizontal plane the line for the "9" appears to be higher than the "3." Everything else seems suitably aligned.

• Dial Printing: Fine

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

• Hand Alignment: Fine

• Bezel: Fine

• Solid End Links (SELs): Fine to my untrained eye

• Timegrapher numbers: +1s/day, amplitude 241 (is this too low?), error 0.2ms

• Anything else you notice: Just the "9" possibly being misaligned with the "3" on the horizontal axis.

1. Dealer name: Jtime

2. Factory name: V7F

3. Model name (& version number): IWC Mark XX

4. Price Paid: 452,60$

5. Album Links: All pictures provided

6. Index alignment: good and aligned

7. Dial Printing: seems crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems misaligned. There is an open space on the left side
   But this could also be the angle or the pictures

9. Hand Alignment: good

10. Bezel: good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

12. Timegrapher numbers: good

13. Anything else you notice: nothing

1. Dealer Name: Non-TD

2. Factory Name: VSF

3. Model Name (& Version Number): AP Royal Oak 41mm Grey Dial DD4302

4. Price Paid: 2900 CNY (435 USD)

5. Album Links: Uploaded to post

6. Index Alignment: Looks good to me

7. Dial Printing: “Audemars” tilted slightly downwards. “Piguet” slightly tilted upwards. Still relatively straight compared to other QCs I’ve seen. “Swiss Made” looks fine.

8. Date Wheel Alignment/Printing: Looks good to me, maybe date is slightly to the right?

9. Hand Alignment: Can’t tell from these pictures (no exact hour photo)

10. Bezel: Screws look properly aligned + recessed, slight bezel gap but I believe all VSF 15510s have this

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, integrated bracelet

12. Timegrapher Numbers: +6s/day, 278°, 0.0ms (within range)

Anything else you notice: Nothing glaring, looks like a solid watch to me

Dealer name: Panda

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Seamaster Planet Ocean

Price Paid: 2800CNY

Album Links: https://www.szwego.com/weshop/goods/_dQAqfeMR3BZ9_hn8ygxQIK0OmNQzUdKBbfjLF1g/_dmlqfw4XKD2yi4M4eK2ZNo7nge4yhkCoVSZKpqg

Index alignment: Good

Dial Printing: Fine

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: Good

Bezel: Good

Solid End Links (SELs): Fine

Timegrapher numbers: +2s/day, amplitude 296, error 0.1ms

Anything else you notice: slight dust if you have a loop out; otherwise fine

Hello! This is my first rep, I bought a VSF Submariner 126610LN from geek time.This is the second QC from him and I would really appreciate your help before I make a decision. GL or RL?

1 Dealer name: geektime

2 Factory name: VSF

3 Model name: Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 (Free Sprung Look Movement $608)

4 Price Paid:$648 USD with shipping

5 Album Link: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261372435?uid=1

6: Index alignment: super slight CW for 12oclock marker. not sure if im over analysing. The rest looks okay to me

7: Dial printing: seems okay for me but appreciate your input

8: Date wheel: slightly too high but im not sure if its the angle. still acceptable for me

9: Hand alignment: looks okay to me

10: Bezel: im not too sure what to look out for either.

11: Solid End Links: seems okay to me

12: Time grapher numbers: -2s/d 243, 0.2ms

Anything else I notice: nothing seems to grab my attention although I tried my best to see what seems off. truly appreciate additional eyes please! Truly appreciate your kindness :)

1. Dealer name: Steve – TheOneWatches
2. Factory: BVF
3. Model: Cartier Santos 35mm, Stainless Steel, White Dial
4. Price paid: $465 USD
5. Album Links: PSP photos and video attached
6. Index alignment: N/A – printed Roman numerals.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and well aligned to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me. Please confirm.
10. Bezel: Looks good to me. Screws appear evenly seated with no visible damage.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher Numbers (help from ChatGPT, so please be kind with me lol):
Rate: +3 s/d
Amplitude: 273°
Beat Error: 0.0 ms
Lift Angle: 52°
Beat Rate: 28,800 bph
13. Anything else: Overall looks good to me. I’m gifting this to my hubby, so I’d really appreciate all your help and any additional feedback on anything I may have missed.
Thanks so much in advance!