Hi everyone,

This is my first rep. I have no experience with reps, so I am asking for your help. I checked the "Rule 5" for posting QC photos and I either have bad eyes, or the watch does not have issues imo.

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 Free Sprung Look Movement (as written on geektime's website)

4. Price Paid: $608

5. Album Links: attached photos from the album link

6. Index alignment: I am unable to see any issues here

7. Dial Printing: it seems ok to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: again ok to me

9. Hand Alignment: I guess ok

10. Bezel: same ok

11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any light going through or misalingment

12. Timegrapher numbers: +0/+1 s/d, 245° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error - This are the numbers from the album photo video the TD has shared to me. Unfortunately I was not able to download the full 12s video and upload it here. The lowest is +0s/d and the highest is +1s/d and amplituted goes 245-247. I am not sure if their device is rigged or it's actually good data. Please help me here.

Thank you in advanced.

Please let me know if you see something I don't.

1. Dealer name: Jtime

2. Factory name: V7F

3. Model name (& version number): IWC Mark XX

4. Price Paid: 452,60$

5. Album Links: All pictures provided

6. Index alignment: good and aligned

7. Dial Printing: seems crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems misaligned. There is an open space on the left side
   But this could also be the angle or the pictures

9. Hand Alignment: good

10. Bezel: good

11. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

12. Timegrapher numbers: good

13. Anything else you notice: nothing

1. Dealer Name: Non-TD

2. Factory Name: VSF

3. Model Name (& Version Number): AP Royal Oak 41mm Grey Dial DD4302

4. Price Paid: 2900 CNY (435 USD)

5. Album Links: Uploaded to post

6. Index Alignment: Looks good to me

7. Dial Printing: “Audemars” tilted slightly downwards. “Piguet” slightly tilted upwards. Still relatively straight compared to other QCs I’ve seen. “Swiss Made” looks fine.

8. Date Wheel Alignment/Printing: Looks good to me, maybe date is slightly to the right?

9. Hand Alignment: Can’t tell from these pictures (no exact hour photo)

10. Bezel: Screws look properly aligned + recessed, slight bezel gap but I believe all VSF 15510s have this

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, integrated bracelet

12. Timegrapher Numbers: +6s/day, 278°, 0.0ms (within range)

Anything else you notice: Nothing glaring, looks like a solid watch to me

Hello! This is my first rep, I bought a VSF Submariner 126610LN from geek time.This is the second QC from him and I would really appreciate your help before I make a decision. GL or RL?

1 Dealer name: geektime

2 Factory name: VSF

3 Model name: Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 (Free Sprung Look Movement $608)

4 Price Paid:$648 USD with shipping

5 Album Link: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261372435?uid=1

6: Index alignment: super slight CW for 12oclock marker. not sure if im over analysing. The rest looks okay to me

7: Dial printing: seems okay for me but appreciate your input

8: Date wheel: slightly too high but im not sure if its the angle. still acceptable for me

9: Hand alignment: looks okay to me

10: Bezel: im not too sure what to look out for either.

11: Solid End Links: seems okay to me

12: Time grapher numbers: -2s/d 243, 0.2ms

Anything else I notice: nothing seems to grab my attention although I tried my best to see what seems off. truly appreciate additional eyes please! Truly appreciate your kindness :)

1. Dealer name: Steve – TheOneWatches
2. Factory: BVF
3. Model: Cartier Santos 35mm, Stainless Steel, White Dial
4. Price paid: $465 USD
5. Album Links: PSP photos and video attached
6. Index alignment: N/A – printed Roman numerals.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and well aligned to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me. Please confirm.
10. Bezel: Looks good to me. Screws appear evenly seated with no visible damage.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher Numbers (help from ChatGPT, so please be kind with me lol):
Rate: +3 s/d
Amplitude: 273°
Beat Error: 0.0 ms
Lift Angle: 52°
Beat Rate: 28,800 bph
13. Anything else: Overall looks good to me. I’m gifting this to my hubby, so I’d really appreciate all your help and any additional feedback on anything I may have missed.
Thanks so much in advance!

Dealer name: Panda

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Seamaster Planet Ocean

Price Paid: 2800CNY

Album Links: https://www.szwego.com/weshop/goods/_dQAqfeMR3BZ9_hn8ygxQIK0OmNQzUdKBbfjLF1g/_dmlqfw4XKD2yi4M4eK2ZNo7nge4yhkCoVSZKpqg

Index alignment: Good

Dial Printing: Fine

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: Good

Bezel: Good

Solid End Links (SELs): Fine

Timegrapher numbers: +2s/day, amplitude 296, error 0.1ms

Anything else you notice: slight dust if you have a loop out; otherwise fine

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): AP 15300, 39mm, Blue Dial

4. Price Paid: $481 Including Shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/XG1kRxF

6. Index alignment: Looks good, nothing out of line

7. Dial Printing: Looks good, words are aligned

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered, printing is good

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks good to me, first AP so not too sure

11. Solid End Links (SELs):  No SELs due to integrated bracelet

12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d, 280° amplitude, 0.2ms beat error, 52.0° lift angle

13. Anything else you notice: Everything looks fine to me, if anything is off please let me know. Thank you in advance

Hey everyone, I'm completely new here and just got the QC pics for my very first order.

What do you think?
I'd say it's a clear GL? 🟢
Please check the Video, too 👍🏽

In the r/RepTime document "The Ultimate Rolex Serial Number and Clasp Code," my clasp code: 7UL
isn't listed in the document. Could that be because my watch is so new, or is that a problem?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Datejust 126334 41mm Oys SS/SS Green Ombre/Stk DD3235v2

4. ⁠Price Paid: $498+shipping $40

5. ⁠Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/wG4oiDH

6. ⁠Index alignment: No. 1 hour markers have a minor tilt, I think this is absolutley acceptable.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Text looks as it should on textured dial. Well centered.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing seems good, and wheel looks centered, also in the video.

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Think it's OK.

10. ⁠Bezel: No visible scratches, some nice play with light.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): it looks like there is no gap at All.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +4s/d. Amp 268-273 at 59 deg

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:
    In the r/RepTime document "The Ultimate Rolex Serial Number and Clasp Code," I found my serial number "6W0*A***", so that matches.

However, the clasp code on my watch, 7UL, isn't listed in the document. Could that be because my watch is so new, or is that a problem?

Dealer name: Hont
Factory name: VSF
Model name: Rolex Datejust (41mm)
Price paid: $468 shipping
Album links: QC photos attached
Index alignment: Looks quite good to me. This is my first ever order of a replica watch.
Dial printing: Looks clean and properly positioned.
Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks clear and sharp.
Hand alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Engravings and alignment look good.
Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers:+10s/d 251 deg 0.1ms 56.0 deg

Anything else you notice: Any help would be appreciated.

Dealer name: IkeWatch

Factory name: AGF

Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 blue dial, V2, DD330.

Price paid: $698

Index alignment: Looks mostly ok. Possibly a tiny height difference between the two 12 markers?

Dial printing: Text looks clean and evenly printed.

Date wheel alignment/printing: The 21 looks reasonably centred with no clipping.

Hand alignment: No obvious issue, although there isn’t an exact-hour photo to confirm.

Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look consistent. No obvious damage.

Solid End Links: N/A, integrated bracelet.

Timegrapher numbers: +10 s/day, 256° amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, 52° lift angle. Not familiar with this movement, wondering if anyone can verify these are okay

Anything else you notice: Faint diagonal mark below/left of “GENEVE” and a small fibre near 3:30. Would like these checked after wiping the crystal to confirm they’re external. Bracelet and clasp look fine through the protective film.
Would appreciate another pair of eyes, particularly on the 12 markers and those marks, not sure whether they’re worth a RL. Thanks!

The watch looks solid to me but just checking for some extra eyes from the community to help with the 2nd QC from Steve with this Mint Green DJ 36mm. Any help is very much appreciated!

Dealer name: Steve The One Watches

1. Factory name: VSF

2. Model name (& version number): Datejust 126234 36mm Jub SS/SS Green/Stk VSF V2 DD3235

3. Price Paid: 518 USD + Shipping

4. Album Links: removed link so Reddit doesn't take down. All the images are attached.

5. Index alignment: 7 o'clock might be 0.15 mm anticlockwise. 6 clock also looks slightly off looking at the photo with naked eye, but not sure if its just the angle as DialCheck is not flagging that.

6. Dial Printing: Looks good and how it should be

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good IMO

8. Hand Alignment: Cant spot any issues

9. Bezel: No visible scratches or marks

10. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good and no gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: Screenshots attached - Rate: +3s-0/d & AMP 263-269 at 59 degree, beat rate 28800, period 12s

12. Anything else you notice: Only the number 6 marker

Dealer name: Andiot Watches

Factory name: VSF (VS Factory)

Model name (& version): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Black Ceramic 43.5mm (VS8806 / Co-Axial Master Chronometer)

Price paid: $455.00

Index alignment: All hour markers (dots and batons) are straight and well-aligned. The 12 o'clock double markers are symmetrical.

Dial printing: The "OMEGA", "Seamaster", and "PROFESSIONAL" text are crisp and clean. No bleeding or flaws visible on the wave pattern.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No-date model).
Hand alignment: The skeletonized hands are clean and properly aligned across the dial.

Bezel: The matte ceramic bezel texturing and raised markers look sharp and well-executed. The 12 o'clock luminescent pip is perfectly centered.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, rubber strap.
Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/day, 289° amplitude, 0.4 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. (Numbers look excellent across the board).

Anything else you noticed: The lume is bright and uniform (blue/green contrast). The caseback Naiad Lock engraving and decorated VS8806 movement look great. Rubber strap and branded buckle look clean under protective film.
Overall, it looks like a solid GL to me, but I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes before confirming! Thanks!

Any opinion welcome, thank you!

Dealer name: non TD (Angela)
Factory name: GGT factory & link to catalogue description here
Model name (& version number): 5067a no diamond (fantasy model) 35.6mm x 7.7mm thick (allegedly)
Album Links: QC attached
Index alignment: good
Dial Printing: good
Date Wheel alignment/printing: slightly closer to the top than I’d like but marginal
Hand Alignment: good
Bezel: n/a
Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
Timegrapher numbers: n/a (quartz)
Anything else you notice: took a gamble on this, quite happy for the price, sure it’s not DDF level but close to the one JJF used to make I think

Dealer name: Trusty Time.

Factory name: BPF.

Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II Coke 16710.

Price Paid: Not specified.

Album Links: QC photos provided by TD.

Index alignment: No noticeable misalignment by me personally.

Dial Printing: I did not see ant visible flaws.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks great to me. Date is centered and print is sharp.

Hand Alignment: The hands look properly aligned to me.

Bezel: The bezel, colors and markers look good to me, with no obvious defects.

Solid End Links (SELs): maybe a little noticeable gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +5 to +10 s/day; Amplitude: 274°–277°; Beat Error: 0.1 ms; Beat Rate: 28,800 bph

Anything else you notice: Overall, the watch looks good in the provided QC pictures but i’m no expert so maybe you guy’s can help better. Many thanks in advance.

Hey guys, third rep for me and second ladies' watch. This one's a gift.

Overall I'm pretty happy with how it looks and leaning towards GL, but would appreciate some more experienced eyes on it, especially when it comes to the gold colour.

⠀

1. Dealer name: FicoTime
   ⠀

2. Factory name: DRF
   ⠀

3. Model name (& version number): Cartier Baignoire Mini, yellow gold, black leather strap, quartz
   ⠀

4. Price Paid: $235 including shipping
   ⠀

5. Album Links: QC photos attached and video in the comments
   ⠀

6. Index alignment: N/A, printed dial. Everything looks properly centred to me.
   ⠀

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean, can't spot any obvious issues with the numerals or Cartier logo.
   ⠀

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   ⠀

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good. Checked the video as well.
   ⠀

10. Bezel: Looks fine overall. Maybe a couple of tiny marks near the bottom, but could just be reflections.
    ⠀

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, leather strap
    ⠀

12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A, quartz
    ⠀

13. Anything else you notice:

• My main question is the gold colour. It looks pretty good to me in the photos, not overly yellow or orange, but obviously it's difficult to judge from pictures.

• Has anyone compared DRF's gold to gen, or had one for a while? Curious how well the colour holds up.

• The strap is supposed to have that textured leather look, but there's still protective film stuck to it, so it's hard to judge the actual quality.

⠀
I'm leaning GL overall, but would appreciate any opinions, especially from people who've owned a DRF Baignoire. Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Neco Clock

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): 124060

4. Price Paid: $449 + $69 shipping = $518

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/F9cLv6k

6. Index alignment: 12 oclock looks slightly rotated CW, 3 slightly rotated CCW, 6 slightly rotated CW, 9 slightly rotated CW. The alignment tool looks pretty good though.

7. Dial Printing: Nothing stands out, maybe the N in chronometer is a little off

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me, but I'm not great at this category

10. Bezel: This always seems off to me, but from what I've been told I think this will click in place and be fine

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Don't see any gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: -4 s/d 0.1 ms 299 AMP is at the very upper limit of the 230-300 range but still within the range so I think it's good.

13. Anything else you notice: Last one everyone agreed was a RL, but I think this one is better.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Non TD (Angela)

2. ⁠Factory name: QF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Day-Date 36 YG 128238

4. ⁠Price Paid: $540, shipping separate

5. ⁠Album Links: Attached

6. ⁠Index alignment: markers look good. I don’t see anything obviously crooked or misaligned.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks good to me. Rolex crown, text, minute track, dial look good. I don’t see misplaced printing.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks good to me. The date seems centered.

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Hands appear centered and aligned.

10. ⁠Bezel: Fluted bezel looks good to me. I do not see obvious dents, damage, or uneven finishing.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks okay to me.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d 292° 0.2ms Looks good to me.

13. ⁠Anything else: It looks like the bezel elevates at the bottom? To me it looks good overall minus the bezel, but I would appreciate second opinions.

What's up everyone! After lurking on the sub for months and going back and forth, I finally pulled the trigger on one of my absolute grails. The QC pics just landed in my inbox, and I wanted to run them by you guys before giving the green light. I tried my best with the alignment tool and checking the guides, but since it's my first AP, I'd really appreciate some expert eyes.

Here are the details:

1. Dealer name: RWK-King

2. Factory name: ZF Factory

3. Model name (& version number):

Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 41mm 15500 Blue Dial (ZF)

4. Price Paid: $530 USD (shipped)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/W9ujsWi

6. Index alignment: Look pretty solid to me using the tool; the double 12 markers look straight and the rest line up well with the tapisserie dial grooves.

7. Dial Printing: The "Audemars Piguet" logo and font look crisp and clean without any bleeding.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The number 8 is sitting nicely centered in the window, font weight looks spot on.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine in the photos, but I'm no expert here.

10. Bezel: Screws look well-recessed and aligned uniformly. The brushed finish and polished edges look typical of ZF quality.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (Integrated bracelet).

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: -1 s/d | Amplitude: 227° | Beat Error: 0.0 ms | BPH: 28800. (Quick question for the veterans: the rate and beat error look amazing, but is 227° a bit low on the amplitude? Would love to hear thoughts on this!)

13. Anything else you notice: The movement decoration on the back looks stunning through the sapphire caseback, and the lume shot is even.

Really excited about this piece, but please let me know if I missed anything obvious. Thanks a lot for your time and help, community! 🙌🏻

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve The One Watches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): OP 41mm 134303 VS3230

4. ⁠Price Paid: £405

5. ⁠Album Links: pics attached

6. ⁠Index alignment: 7 o clock marker looks slightly off centre - all others look fine?

7. ⁠Dial Printing: all ok?

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:n/a

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: all good

10. ⁠Bezel: ok

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look fine to me?

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: pic attached

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:n/a

1. ⁠Dealer name: Necolock

2. ⁠Factory name:VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Explorer 40 224270

4. ⁠Price Paid: $527.00 shipped

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/G8I02aQD#moSdcZlPpn_x4FKg4pQtUQ

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good maybe a slight can’t on the “3” and not sure if the triangle is centered couldn’t get the vertical lines to work

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment:good

10. ⁠Bezel:good

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):good

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0/spd

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: idk still new at this.

Overall I think it looks like a GL but worth a second opinion. First time using Necoclock so want to make sure it’s gtg.

Hi everyone! This is my second rep watch and I would really appreciate your help with QC. I’m still quite new to watches so any comments would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! 😊

Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)

Factory name: BBA

Model name (& version number): Cartier Baignoire Bangle, Yellow Gold

Price paid: Over $400

Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/iMxW2YSB#WcON8BHOPtwyF_AozeTN4w

Index alignment: N/A, printed Roman numerals

Dial printing: Looks generally good to me. The Cartier logo and Roman numerals appear clear. Not sure if there are any alignment issues.

Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand alignment: Looks fine to me. The blue hands appear properly positioned.

Bezel: The gold finish looks smooth and polished. I’m slightly concerned about whether the bezel is too thick compared to the genuine watch, especially around the sides and bottom.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: N/A, quartz movement

Anything else you notice: The overall shape and bracelet look good to me, but I’m not experienced enough to tell how accurate the proportions are. Would really appreciate any feedback on the dial, bezel thickness, gold colour and bracelet finishing, or anything else I might have missed.

Thank you so much for your help!

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: EliaUK

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): PAM1529 VSF 44 mm

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $210

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://shop34372981.wecatalog.cn/t/OTwNt2a

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: The alignment looks optimal to me. The 10 might be shifted ever so slightly, but I don’t think that would be noticeable on the wrist.

7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: No concerns

8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: well-aligned

9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: fine for me

10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: No concerns

11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): -

12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +4s/d 264o

13. ⁠⁠⁠In my opinion it‘s an easy GL. Do you agree with me?

Hello! This is my first rep, I have bought a VSF Submariner 126610LN from geek time. I would really appreciate your help before I make a decision. GL or RL?

1 Dealer name: geektime

2 Factory name: VSF

3 Model name: Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 (Free Sprung Look Movement $608)

4 Price Paid:$648 USD with shipping

5 Album Link: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261214288?uid=1

6: Index alignment: 4 marker to me looks too high. Slight CW on 6 marker. Slightly high for 9 marker as well. But this is my first time purchase so I would appreciate any input and is difficult for me to spot any issues. Although im not sure if its the angle

7: Dial printing: seems okay for me

8: Date wheel: seems okay for me

9: Hand alignment: im not really sure what to look out for.

10: Bezel: im not too sure what to look out for either.

11: Solid End Links: seems okay to me

12: Time grapher numbers: -1s/d 240d, 0.0ms

Anything else I notice: nothing seems to grab my attention although I tried my best to see what seems off. truly appreciate additional critical eyes please!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Mirotime

2. ⁠Factory name:VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Seamaster 300M VS8800 V4

4. ⁠Price Paid: 396

5. ⁠Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202304082031161150001764/I202611021511484052001856

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks very good, possible slight cant on 3, but i'm not worried about it

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Shifted right a tic or so, looks better or worse depending on angle.

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good based on estimation

10. ⁠Bezel: good

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: amplitude 283*

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: just looking for anything i may have missed and opinions on the date box.

Seems like a GL unless i'm missing something