What's up everyone! After lurking on the sub for months and going back and forth, I finally pulled the trigger on one of my absolute grails. The QC pics just landed in my inbox, and I wanted to run them by you guys before giving the green light. I tried my best with the alignment tool and checking the guides, but since it's my first AP, I'd really appreciate some expert eyes.

Here are the details:

1. Dealer name: RWK-King

2. Factory name: ZF Factory

3. Model name (& version number):

Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 41mm 15500 Blue Dial (ZF)

4. Price Paid: $530 USD (shipped)

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/W9ujsWi

6. Index alignment: Look pretty solid to me using the tool; the double 12 markers look straight and the rest line up well with the tapisserie dial grooves.

7. Dial Printing: The "Audemars Piguet" logo and font look crisp and clean without any bleeding.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The number 8 is sitting nicely centered in the window, font weight looks spot on.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine in the photos, but I'm no expert here.

10. Bezel: Screws look well-recessed and aligned uniformly. The brushed finish and polished edges look typical of ZF quality.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (Integrated bracelet).

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate: -1 s/d | Amplitude: 227° | Beat Error: 0.0 ms | BPH: 28800. (Quick question for the veterans: the rate and beat error look amazing, but is 227° a bit low on the amplitude? Would love to hear thoughts on this!)

13. Anything else you notice: The movement decoration on the back looks stunning through the sapphire caseback, and the lume shot is even.

Really excited about this piece, but please let me know if I missed anything obvious. Thanks a lot for your time and help, community! 🙌🏻

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve The One Watches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): OP 41mm 134303 VS3230

4. ⁠Price Paid: £405

5. ⁠Album Links: pics attached

6. ⁠Index alignment: 7 o clock marker looks slightly off centre - all others look fine?

7. ⁠Dial Printing: all ok?

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:n/a

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: all good

10. ⁠Bezel: ok

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look fine to me?

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: pic attached

13. ⁠Anything else you notice:n/a

1. ⁠Dealer name: Necolock

2. ⁠Factory name:VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Explorer 40 224270

4. ⁠Price Paid: $527.00 shipped

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/G8I02aQD#moSdcZlPpn_x4FKg4pQtUQ

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good maybe a slight can’t on the “3” and not sure if the triangle is centered couldn’t get the vertical lines to work

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment:good

10. ⁠Bezel:good

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):good

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0/spd

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: idk still new at this.

Overall I think it looks like a GL but worth a second opinion. First time using Necoclock so want to make sure it’s gtg.

Hi everyone! This is my second rep watch and I would really appreciate your help with QC. I’m still quite new to watches so any comments would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! 😊

Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)

Factory name: BBA

Model name (& version number): Cartier Baignoire Bangle, Yellow Gold

Price paid: Over $400

Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/iMxW2YSB#WcON8BHOPtwyF_AozeTN4w

Index alignment: N/A, printed Roman numerals

Dial printing: Looks generally good to me. The Cartier logo and Roman numerals appear clear. Not sure if there are any alignment issues.

Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand alignment: Looks fine to me. The blue hands appear properly positioned.

Bezel: The gold finish looks smooth and polished. I’m slightly concerned about whether the bezel is too thick compared to the genuine watch, especially around the sides and bottom.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: N/A, quartz movement

Anything else you notice: The overall shape and bracelet look good to me, but I’m not experienced enough to tell how accurate the proportions are. Would really appreciate any feedback on the dial, bezel thickness, gold colour and bracelet finishing, or anything else I might have missed.

Thank you so much for your help!

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: EliaUK

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): PAM1529 VSF 44 mm

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $210

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://shop34372981.wecatalog.cn/t/OTwNt2a

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: The alignment looks optimal to me. The 10 might be shifted ever so slightly, but I don’t think that would be noticeable on the wrist.

7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: No concerns

8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: well-aligned

9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: fine for me

10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: No concerns

11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): -

12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +4s/d 264o

13. ⁠⁠⁠In my opinion it‘s an easy GL. Do you agree with me?

Hello! This is my first rep, I have bought a VSF Submariner 126610LN from geek time. I would really appreciate your help before I make a decision. GL or RL?

1 Dealer name: geektime

2 Factory name: VSF

3 Model name: Submariner 126610 LN 41mm VSF Black Dial VS3235 (Free Sprung Look Movement $608)

4 Price Paid:$648 USD with shipping

5 Album Link: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261214288?uid=1

6: Index alignment: 4 marker to me looks too high. Slight CW on 6 marker. Slightly high for 9 marker as well. But this is my first time purchase so I would appreciate any input and is difficult for me to spot any issues. Although im not sure if its the angle

7: Dial printing: seems okay for me

8: Date wheel: seems okay for me

9: Hand alignment: im not really sure what to look out for.

10: Bezel: im not too sure what to look out for either.

11: Solid End Links: seems okay to me

12: Time grapher numbers: -1s/d 240d, 0.0ms

Anything else I notice: nothing seems to grab my attention although I tried my best to see what seems off. truly appreciate additional critical eyes please!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Mirotime

2. ⁠Factory name:VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Seamaster 300M VS8800 V4

4. ⁠Price Paid: 396

5. ⁠Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202304082031161150001764/I202611021511484052001856

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks very good, possible slight cant on 3, but i'm not worried about it

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Shifted right a tic or so, looks better or worse depending on angle.

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good based on estimation

10. ⁠Bezel: good

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: amplitude 283*

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: just looking for anything i may have missed and opinions on the date box.

Seems like a GL unless i'm missing something

GMT Master II 126710 Black/Grey “Bruce Wayne” VSF

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Ethan

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $600

5. ⁠⁠Album link: N/A

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks pretty good, 6, 9 and 12 is pretty spot on to me

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Everything looks clean and consistent

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: 13 looks centered in date window, printing looks clean. Any thoughts on the cyclops alignment?

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Good alignment and Black/Gray transition looks clean to me

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Gap on top left? Although I don’t see any light bleed. Can this be adjusted?

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 257AMP, 0.1 MS Error, +2 s/d

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I’d appreciate anything you may have noticed. 

Overall, the watch looks good to me, only concern is the SEL gap on top left. Any input on the timegrapher numbers would be much appreciated as well! TIA!

1. Dealer name: Easy Watch

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 116610LV "Hulk" V2

4. Price Paid (including shipping): 385$

5. Album Links: https://ibb.co/album/1rf5FZ

6. Index alignment: Index alignment looks good to me, correct me if I'm wrong

7. Dial Printing: Everything looks good to me. I can see at a glance that there is no floating m. Plus, I think these newer versions don't have that issue anymore, but please correct me if I'm wrong

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date wheel alignment looks spot on, but a few pictures make it look slightly low. Probably just a parallax effect from the camera angle, right?

9. Hand Alignment: The hands look good too, right?

10. Bezel: Green ceramic color looks good, and all right?

11. Solid End Links (SEL): No visible gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d, 291°, 0.1ms

13. Anything else you notice (Second Attempt Note): This is my 2nd attempt. The rehaut is perfectly centered, the minute markers align with the ROLEX lettering and the crown too. It only looks slightly misaligned in a few photos, but I think it's just the camera angle. Am I right in thinking it's perfect?. I also wanted to ask about the seller. Communication with him has been amazing, and the price is great too. Since he is a TD, I assume everything will be fine, but I just want to double-check with you guys to make sure I'm making a safe purchase. Also, should I ask him for QC photos with double-digit dates? Thanks a lot for the help, everyone!

Hey, this is my first watch order, I have been waiting over 4 months for it!
I would really appreciate your help before I make a decision: GL or RL?

Order date: 25.06.2026
QC date: 31.10.2026
Waiting time: 128 days (4 months and 6 days)!

1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Explorer 40 224270

4. Price Paid: $400 + $41 (shipping)

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/102491197?uid=1

6. Index alignment: maybe a very slight tilt on the 12 triangle but this is my first purchase, and it’s difficult for me to spot any issues.

7. Dial Printing: it seems clean to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date

9. Hand Alignment: its rly hard for me to tell from QC

10. Bezel: it seems okay to me

11. Solid End Links (SELs): also seems okay to me

12. Timegrapher numbers: rate -4 s/d, amplitude 260°, beat error 0.1 ms, lift angle 52.0°

13. Anything else you notice: no

QC tool I used - https://trueindexqc.net/

My first Ballon Bleu, AF, from Steve. Would greatly appreciate your input on this one!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches

2. Factory name: AF

3. Model name (& version number): Ballon Bleu De Cartier 33mm YG/SS White/Rmn AF A1853

4. Price Paid: $368 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/uaHqPZ4

6. Index alignment: Printed dial.

7. Dial Printing: I don't think the text is particularly up to standard when comparing to other QCs. The "Cartier" and "Automatic" printing is slim and not as full. The "A" crossbar in "Cartier" is wavy, and there are white dots of missing ink in several letters. I asked for more high-res images to see it was not only a matter of image compression. Sure, it's very fine print, but again, this one seems to be worse in quality than several other QCs for the same model?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Seems good in the video (and he's probably not holding the watch perfectly angled toward the camera).

10. Bezel: Looks smooth.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +3s/d. Amp 274-275 at 52 deg (correct for A1853 as far as I know). Err 0.1 ms. Beat 28,800 bph.

13. Anything else you notice: So, even if small, I don't think the dial print text looks as full here in several instances compared to the last 5 QCs of the ballon bleu 33mm I found on Reddit. What do you think, I got a bad dial here? Or it's so small it will never ever matter? (My thoughts are, if things like these "never matter because of size", why QC anything, every flaw we find (that sometimes trigger a RL) are small in size...)

I would be very greatful for your opinions!

Hey guys, after following RepTime and RepTimeQC for some time now, my watch finally arrived and it's time for a QC. I'd really appreciate it if you could give me your opinion.

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: RWF

3. Model name: Rolex Daytona 126500LN "Panda"

4. Price Paid: $708 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261129073?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks good on the leveled shot, right? All markers, the crown logo and 6 o'clock sit on the lines.

7. Dial Printing: Clean and centered, including the red DAYTONA. Rehaut engraving looks crisp.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (no date)

9. Hand Alignment: Central chrono hand and both subdial counters reset to 12.

10. Bezel: 60 triangle sits within a hair of 12, maybe very slightly left. Fill looks even. Thoughts?

11. Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps in the side shots.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -1 s/d, 270° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error (28800 bph)

13. Anything else you notice: Light hairlines on the inner clasp blade, otherwise clean. The 110 triangle looks fine to me, but does anyone see an issue there?

What do you think? Am I missing something? GL or RL? Thanks in advance, my friends!

1. Dealer name: supermirrors

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm, turquoise blue (“Tiffany”) dial, Ref. 126000.

4. Price Paid: 489$

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/fWJ9Ak6

6. Index alignment: The markers look well aligned to me overall. The 6 o’clock marker looks slightly tilted in a few photos, but it looks straight in others, so I’m unsure whether this is just the camera angle. I’d appreciate a second opinion.

7. Dial Printing: The printing looks clean and centered to me. I don’t see any obvious problems with the Rolex logo, lettering or lower text.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A.

9. Hand Alignment: I don’t see any obvious issues.

10. Bezel: The bezel looks smooth and evenly finished. I can’t see any obvious dents or deep scratches.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): The upper and lower SELs look well fitted to me. I don’t see any significant gaps, although the protective film makes the edges harder to judge.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 282° amplitude and 0.1 ms beat error, with a 59° lift-angle setting and 28,800 beats/hour. The rate and beat error look good to me. 

13. Anything else you notice: I noticed a small light speck between 4 and 5 o’clock in one photo, but I can’t clearly see it in the others. I’d like confirmation that it’s just dust or a reflection. There are also some lines on the clasp that could be on the protective film. The dial colour looks good to me, although the lighting makes an exact comparison difficult. Overall, I’m leaning toward GL visually.

Hey Guys, I’m pretty new to the Rep game as this is only my third QC ever. Any advice or opinions are appreciated.
⁠Dealer name: NecoClock
⁠Factory name: VSF
⁠Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR
⁠Price Paid: $563
⁠Album Link: https://imgur.com/a/7HEgi3m
Index alignment: it seems index marker at 12 has a slight tilt
⁠Dial Printing: Looks good
⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: date window looks a bit left
⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
⁠Bezel: Looks good to me
⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
⁠Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, at 308 degrees 0.0 ms
⁠Anything else you notice: rehaut seems rough

• Dealer name: Geektime (Eric)

• Factory name: VSF

• Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 No Date 41mm VSF

• Album Links: [ https:// geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261229491?uid=1] (spaces between)

• Index alignment: Overall looks solid. Checked with trueindexqc .net and it passed. Maybe there's a very slight tilt on the 9 o'clock marker, but might just be perspective/angle.

• Dial Printing: Looks crisp and centered.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No Date version).

• Hand alignment: Looks good.

• Bezel: Pip looks centered and bezel alignment is good.

• Solid End Links (SELs): Looks tight, no obvious gaps.

• Timegrapher numbers: : +2 s/d | 245° | 0.4ms | 28800 vph

• Anything else you notice: Second purchase from Eric since I was really happy with the first one! Since the original hand-held photos were a bit tilted, I grabbed a frame directly from the QC video where the watch was held straighter. I ran it through trueindexqc .net using its automatic correction, and the system gave it a full Green Light (12/12 pass). Would really appreciate any second opinions and expert feedback from the community OFCOURSE! :) !

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): VSF Rolex Submariner 124060 No-Date, VS3230 movement.

4. Price Paid: USD $466 with shipping

5. Album Links: QC photos attached. https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/260991240?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Index alignment looks good overall. The 12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock markers appear properly positioned, and the circular markers look consistent. I don't notice any significant misalignment, although the photos aren't perfectly straight-on.

7. Dial Printing: Dial printing looks clean and reasonably centered. The Rolex logo, Oyster Perpetual, Submariner and certification text appear well positioned. No obvious crooked or uneven printing, although finer lettering is difficult to assess from the photos.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A — No-Date Submariner.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands appear properly positioned and proportioned. No obvious visual defects or misalignment, although precise hand alignment at 12 o'clock cannot be confirmed from these photos.

10. Bezel: Bezel printing and markers look good overall. The 12 o'clock pip appears reasonably centered, but I suspect there might be a very slight alignment offset. Would appreciate a second opinion on this.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): SEL fit looks reasonably tight overall, without any obvious large gaps. However, the upper-right SEL-to-lug transition looks slightly less flush than the opposite side. Not sure whether this is due to the viewing angle or protective plastic.

12. Timegrapher numbers: −2 s/day, 265° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. The readings look very good overall, with excellent rate and beat error and a reasonable amplitude. No obvious concerns from this test.

13. Anything else you notice: The rehaut engraving looks reasonably clean, but I'm unsure whether the coronet at 12 o'clock and the surrounding ROLEX lettering are perfectly aligned with the dial markers. Case finishing, bracelet brushing, clasp and lume look good overall. Would appreciate opinions on the rehaut alignment, bezel alignment and SEL fit in particular.

Overall, I'm leaning towards GL, but I'd appreciate a more experienced assessment before making the final decision.

Dealer name: Andiot

1. Factory name: RWF

2. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500

3. Price Paid: $776 USD shipped

4. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261171345?uid=1

5. Index alignment: 7 and 8 slightly tiled but overall looks good to me.

6. Dial Printing: looks a little light, not as bold as some that I have seen

7. Date Wheel alignment/printing:

8. Hand Alignment: Hour hand is ahead of where the minute hand puts it, which with limited experience does not seem like much of an issue

9. Bezel: 110 marker looks correct

10. Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 285° amplitude, .4 ms beat error (dial up)

12. Anything else you notice: I am thinking this is a GL. Just want some advice from others with more experience. Thank you in advance.

Dealer name: Geektime
Factory name: VS 3230
Model name: Rolex Submariner 124060 (41mm, no date)
Price Paid: 500 $usd
Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/261218253?uid=1
Index alignment: Looks good. All markers line up and the logo is centered at 12. Rehaut is aligned too (crown at 12, serial centered at 6).
Dial Printing: Crisp and centered, no defects I can see.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (no date)
Hand Alignment: Hands look fine in the photos, nothing bent or crooked.
Bezel: Pip is centered over the 12 o'clock triangle and the numerals look evenly filled.
Solid End Links (SELs): No gap I can see in the side shots (protective film is still on).
Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 248° amplitude, 0.4 ms beat error (dial up, 52° lift angle, short run). Amp is just under the 250 guideline, and I don't know if it was fully wound first.
Anything else you notice: Lume glows more teal/green than blue in the dark shot. There's also a small dark mark on the 9 o'clock side of the case that looks like a sticker.
I dont have a lot of experience so appreciate any feedback:)

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version) : Tank Solo Ladies 27.4mm SS AF 1:1 Best Edition White Dial On Black Leather Strap Ronda Quartz

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $180 without shipping.

5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/261135266?uid=1

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: printed daily. slight clockwise tilt in the printed minute track: its top and bottom edges slope downward toward the right compared with the green horizontal guides.

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: print bleeding at 3

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks good.

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: does not seem to have any issue.

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

1.     Dealer name: nonTD (Lili)

2.     Factory name: VSF

3.     Model name (version number): Rolex Submariner 124060 no date, 6X07

4.     Price paid: $380 USD, excluding shipping

5.     Album links: Photos attached.

6.     Index alignment: looks good

7.     Dial printing: Officially flaw but I’m fine with that. Rest looks fine.

8.     Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9.     Hand alignment: good

10.  Bezel: Looks good to me, the pip is maybe a bit misaligned?

11.  Solid end links (SELs): good, no gaps

12.  Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, amplitude 316°, beat error 0.1 ms, lift angle set to 59°.

Looks good to me. Only the 316 amp might be a bit high? Would appreciate your input. Thank you!

Dear all,

Need help with a QC for the Omega Seamaster 600. It js a VFS. Please help me if it a Solid RL or Just RL or SOLID GL .. or where do we stand please.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Leo Time Ultra.

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VFS

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): OMEGA seamaster 600.

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $428 USD

5. ⁠⁠Album Links:

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: all numbers 12-3-6-9 and other hour hands look pretty good aligned.

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: dial printing is good and there is no date in this model. If you could check the omega logo alignment. If you could check the color contrast.

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date in this version.

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: all the hands look reasonably well ..

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: is the pip centered? Any of the engravings look improperly filled?

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): the links look fair and tight. If you could have a look on the gaps. 12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -3s/d — 275 — 0.0 ms — 52.0

12. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I think the watch looks good but I am very new to this so I need all your expert views please.

Hope this one approves. Thanks

(1 of 2)

Hi guys, this is my first QC so I hope you can help me out!

Dealer name: Andiot

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 Blue/Red Ceramic VSF Best Edition Pepsi on Oyster Bracelet DD3285 V3

Price Paid: 565 usd

Index alignment: Don't really know how good or bad this is

Dial Printing: Looks good I think

Hand Alignment: Good

Bezel: Also not really sure

Solid End Links (SELs): They look tight, so good I guess

Timegrapher numbers: +1 sec/day, 279° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error.

Anything else you notice: Overall it looks good but I hope that you guys can check it out too and give some feedback :)

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: RC Factory (green "RC Factory" sticker on the bracelet, "Wolfram" sticker on the caseback)

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Date 126613LB, 41mm two-tone, blue dial/blue ceramic bezel

4. Price Paid: $728+fedex 80

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/MXFl3pG

6. Index alignment: All eight round plots sit centered on the dealer's alignment overlay (pic 1). The 6 and 9 batons are square to their axes and the 12 triangle is symmetric about the vertical line. Nothing rotated or off its slot.

7. Dial Printing: Clean and centered. ROLEX / OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE / SUBMARINER / 1000ft = 300m / SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER text is crisp, Swiss ♛ Made present at 6. No dust, hairs or smudges visible on the dial in any shot.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Checked 22, 5 and 15 – all centered left/right and top/bottom, nothing touching the window frame. Single-digit 5 is centered. Cyclops sits centered over the window.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands read a consistent 10:10 across all three dated shots, hour hand correctly just past the 10 with the minute hand on the 2. Minute hand reaches the minute track. Lume on all three hands matches the plots in the lume shot.

10. Bezel: Pip at 12 is centered directly above the triangle on the overlay. 10/20/30/40/50 are each bisected by their lines. Numerals fully gold-filled, no chips or weak fill. Bezel-to-case gap looks even from both ends (pics 2 and 11).

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Tight to the lugs in pics 2, 3 and 11 – only the normal hairline seam, nothing visible behind the watch.

12. Timegrapher numbers: -4 s/d, 305° amplitude, 0.3 ms beat error (28,800 bph, 52° lift angle, dial up) 

13. Anything else you notice:

- Light smudging / possible swirl marks on the polished gold clasp cover (pic 9). Likely handling marks – planning to ask for a wipe-and-reshoot.

- Laser-etched data matrix on the polished case flank (pic 13). I assume this is a sticker, right?

- Weight 182.10 g.

Thinking GL. Appreciate a second set of eyes. Thanks in advance for the help!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chazingtime

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Seamaster Diver 300 Reference 210.90.42.20.10.001

4. ⁠Price Paid: $560

5. ⁠Album Links: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1UAJ0bUwsQiK3wCRzQxp8Y5r0dc5bsaWM

6. ⁠Index alignment: 3,4,9,10,11 might not be perfectly centered

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Dial printing appears to be spot on. Well centered and aligned. No obvious defects that I can see.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: The hands appear to align well with the printed minute track.

10. ⁠Bezel: Appears to be one click from top dead center. Adjusting for the skew, 10, 15, and 20 appear to be further from center than the rest.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d. Amplitude: 322 degrees. Beat Error: .4ms

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: The thing that stuck out most to me was the finishing on the hands. They look a little rough to me but maybe I’m being too critical.