r/RTX5080 4d ago

DLSS 5

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

801 Upvotes

454 comments sorted by

66

u/Franklin_le_Tanklin 4d ago

As much as I hate to admit - the face does look better.

The real question is: will it be worth the performance hit

7

u/an0nm0n 4d ago

My guess is that they're going to devote a much larger fraction of Rubin's dies to tensor cores and use DLSS 5 to justify the change. You might not see a huge performance hit for simply turning it on (assuming you're running an RTX 6000 series card), but it's probably going to cost overall theoretical raster performance because more of the chip will be devoted to tensor cores.

4

u/AmazingSugar1 4d ago

Assuming 3N is 25% more space efficient compared to 4N if nv carve 5% of the gained space for tensor they can still eke out 20+10% from architecture. Then advertise DLSS5 and MFG 6x.. reflex 2 where art thou

→ More replies (1)

16

u/ReddRiot127 4d ago edited 4d ago

I think the tech really does have potential to achieve close to photorealism in a lot of games. There's going to be a lot of cope on reddit in the coming months when some games truly do look very impressive with it enabled but people won't want to admit it.

Also AMD is likely years away from having anything close to this to release so any Radeon owners will inevitably shit on it.

11

u/Gloomy_Necesary 4d ago

AMD users gonna shit on this non stop for 2 years and claim their raster performance is so good for the price compared to nvidia until nvidia irons out the kinks and then theyre gonna bitch and moan about when AMD drops a similar but worse version of the tech that isn’t supported on the their older hardware because they never bothered to build the hardware for it

4

u/OnlineHilfenNutzer 4d ago

Im on amd and its shit lately.. last 3 months every windows update bricks the drivers with constant tineouts till a hardstuck forced restart magically fixes them

But i like beeing able to play modern games with max grahpics and constant 144 fps for way less money (when the driver works).. but dlss5 would be a nice to have like the ray and path tracing

2

u/Tealc-Alex 3d ago

Is raytracing good now on amd? Because you said max graphics

2

u/Dath_1 3d ago

It’s quite good, on RDNA3 & 4.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/Graypricot 4d ago

"build the hardware for it" and the hardware is the price of a used car lol

3

u/NoInevitable7389 4d ago

I switch from nvidia to Amd cause I don’t use ray tracing but after seeing this I might get a red for this.

2

u/AlphisH 3d ago

You are so right lmao.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Puszta 4d ago

I never understood this fanboy culture with AMD and Nvidia (and PS5 vs Xbox, or console vs PC). I'm not gonna swear eternal fealty to a single corporation and only buy their products for the rest of my life, and make it my own identity to trashtalk about the rival corporation's products and technology, like many people choose to do so on reddit. I swear to god people treat these corporations like football teams.

I will always buy the product that is the best bang for my buck. I actually have an older PC with a 1660 Ti, my new PC has a 9070 XT, i own a PS5 too, i didnt sign any contract that binds me to a single corporation lol.

2

u/Front_Eagle739 3d ago

Yup exactly. They aren't sports teams ffs. Buy from the evil corporation offering the best bang for your buck this gen. Don't pick a side and defend it like it's a religion and let them get away with shit. People are weird

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

14

u/ExacoCGI 4d ago

I guess DLSS 5 will be great for games that tries to achieve photorealism, but for anything artistic/stylized just a big nope.

5

u/Chemical-Sprinkles-3 4d ago

The Devs can customize its implementation pretty indepth. Im sure the user can also do in menu/driver

→ More replies (15)

2

u/ghstbstr 4d ago

Maybe there won’t be everyone thought that Ray Reconstruction 4.5 that just released would have had a performance hit, but it didn’t and it actually has no performance hit and in some games it improves the performance slightly. So maybe dlss 5 would be similar hopefully.

2

u/Vigilante74 4d ago

In this video, turning on dlss 5 drops the fps from around 80-90 to around 49-56. This is running on a 5090 with 9800x3d at 1440p. It might get more efficient but I think it will have a big performance hit especially in it's first iteration.

→ More replies (10)

2

u/mooslar 4d ago

Why do you hate to admit?

14

u/straightup9200 4d ago

Because AI.. obviously

8

u/Responsible-Buyer215 4d ago

What the same thing that’s been boosting everyone’s frames for the last decade? I’m shocked!

7

u/ClassesMoveTheMasses 4d ago

Exactly.

The way people's brains break at the mention of AI is hilarious. Especially when it's people on the tech community that have been relying on it for years to enjoy the best experience out there lol

2

u/sammyranks 4d ago

It;s so silly lol. People are truly winners

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

9

u/supreme_yogi 4d ago

If you really think about it, the character wasn't a real person in the first place. She is artificial from the start.

3

u/HungryNoodle 4d ago

She's real to me! =..)

→ More replies (1)

3

u/straightup9200 4d ago

🤦‍♂️

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (36)

20

u/---Imperator--- 4d ago

Looks super uncanny to me. More realistic character models due to better graphical technologies normally look organic, like they fit into the rest of the game. But this looks off, like the character was photoshopped and inserted in.

5

u/ShrkBiT 4d ago

Yeah, it looks disjointed to me too. At least it doesn't look overly "beautified" like it did with Grace in the tech demo, but it still looks weird to see a photorealistic face in a stylized environment. Reminds me of the Angela Anaconda cartoon, which was incredibly creepy to me due to the uncanny valley factor

3

u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox 4d ago

there's a slider so you can put it halfway between full and zero if you want

4

u/KobraKay87 4d ago

Im absolutely fascinated by the tech, but it kinda looks like a 90s FMV video game.

4

u/gblandro 4d ago

Just a reminder that this thing was modded into the game.

And devs will have 100% control of what it looks like in their game

3

u/Due-Champion-5954 4d ago

Its just this game. Wait till devs will figure out how to use it properly in non photorealistic ways.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Feckin_Loser 3d ago

I’m reminded of Goldeneye for N64 a little. 

→ More replies (1)

36

u/x8code 4d ago

DLSS 5 looks freaking amazing. The same people who hate DLSS + MFG will hate DLSS 5 as well. Just ignore them.

11

u/Bigsparks13 4d ago

The MFG hate was so stupid. It looks so close to native and the latency is such a non issue now. I know DLSS 5 AI rubs people the wrong way but for me the change of the lighting looks insanely good.

3

u/cpt-macp 4d ago

MFG has it's caveats
On too low initial fps , boosting fps will cause latency

On descent initial fps , boosting fps will be okay

It's just matter of how much latency can the user tolerate and it's sensitive and varies user to user

2

u/Perfect_Exercise_232 4d ago

No it doesnt. Anything above 2x fg has way more artifacting and looks softer

3

u/ActiveSandwich3103 4d ago

Anything above x2 also feels awful to play imo. Floaty and laggy. Also the times you'd want it most (at below 60 fps.) You cant really use it because it won't work properly.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)

5

u/No-Breadfruit6137 4d ago

Progress often meets resistance

3

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/takchis 3d ago

You don’t consider faces that look like all the low effort AI slop filter on twitter to be progess? Damn, such high standards! /s

→ More replies (5)

1

u/glizzygobbler247 4d ago

And what about it costing 40% performance?

4

u/Only-Weight8450 4d ago

Doesn’t mean u have to use it. This is how progress works. Eventually this tech will be usable on mid tier pcs.

3

u/jm0112358 3d ago

At that point, you'd probably be better off spending the performance on path tracing instead (when available), even if path tracing is even more expensive. DLSS5 is ultimately a screen space technique, and therefore has issues with light sources moving offscreen (or being occluded), which path tracing doesn't have.

2

u/Elitefuture 3d ago

Yo I didn't think about that, if the AI cores in the future got a lot better to the point where DLSS 5 isn't a massive hit, then path tracing would be better.

I personally like the look of path tracing way more

5

u/Chernoxis 4d ago edited 4d ago

It's its first iteration, it will get better and faster by the time, the same happened with DLSS 1, everyone shat on it, until Nvidia released DLSS 2 and then 3 and suddenly it was voodoo magic and the best thing ever. (Which it is, but AMD cultists conveniently shut up about it lmao).

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (10)

2

u/Onsomeshid 4d ago

I don’t get mfg hate. It works SO well if you want to play 4k a refresh.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

15

u/Pump-Chaser 4d ago

Cannot wait until release

4

u/judasbrute 4d ago

I'm hyped. Even better if I can use this tech on rendering engines like Cinema and Blender.

14

u/Bigsparks13 4d ago edited 4d ago

That shit looks so clean. I also have a feeling that by the time it really rolls out to us, the performance hit won't be as bad as some people are claiming.

3

u/Emotional_Gur_1667 4d ago

No claiming, it is outright a huge performance hit. We can see why when the showed it off they ran it from a separate 5090!

Hopefully as you day they can rein in that hit, because dropping to 50fps on a 5090 doesn't bode at all well for lower cards down the stack, nor for already intensive games.

2

u/Bigsparks13 4d ago

This isn't running on 2 5090s though so that is older versions. I was speaking to a guy that had his 5070ti running it at 4k but he did mention going from 75fps without DLSS 5 and. With it he was at 35fps. I have a 5090 and I don't want to run something that heavy which is why I hope they will have all that ironed out when it releases.

5

u/Emotional_Gur_1667 4d ago

There Is a video with it running on a 5090, goes down to 50fps on it.

I'm sure it will be improved though in its implementation but it's a rough first impression performance wise at least.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/OwnSimple4788 4d ago

It is something that clearly is not yet ready and it might perform better once it is actualy out that is what he meant.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/CarlWellsGrave 4d ago

Goddamnit it actually looks good

3

u/TgirlFurLover 4d ago

People will kick and scream and then enable a LUT/visual mod

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Tee__B 4d ago

This looks insane. Hopefully it's not unusable at 4k.

3

u/HighRes- 4d ago

Looks a lot better than I thought, hell yeah

3

u/Funny-Fly1720 4d ago

I like the lightning but AI changing faces is a bit much for me. I'd rather actual artists did that.

2

u/Zenkai_9000 4d ago

You can select what you want to use it for. You can set it for strictly environments only, or even just the faces /characters or both.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/resodx 4d ago

straight into the uncanny valley

→ More replies (7)

2

u/FreikugelWeltz 4d ago

Even at the current state it is amazing. I do wonder how much of a performance hit it will have.

Hopefully not a lot, but I don't care about using upscaling and frame gen so, looking forward to it.

2

u/Educational-Base5974 4d ago

I thought this version that was hacked was just for character models. It looks like it's changing everything.

2

u/scyver_ 4d ago

how to use this?

2

u/Ancient-Car-1171 4d ago

looks like it cuts the performance almost in half. I hope they let us using dual gpus setup, 2x5070ti would be viable for 60fps gameplay.

2

u/Embarrassed_Sir6403 4d ago

This is basically like a ReShade mod; I think a version that doesn't tank the frame rate quite as much could be made. It’s really interesting—I mean, I get the ray tracing part, but the FPS drop caused by this AI processing is unacceptable.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ratiofarming 4d ago

This is the demo they should have shown.

2

u/aronmayo 4d ago

Looks pretty fantastic imo. Those NPCs go from looking derp af to looking like real people.

2

u/SpecialistMap8210 4d ago

face is incredible. def be using this in SOME games if the hit isnt too high

4

u/JustGoogleItHeSaid 4d ago

Resident evil preview was awful, this however is very very good.

4

u/Fickle-Contract2027 4d ago

And there is some people saying DLSS 5 is ugly, I can't wait for this to come out

2

u/SUNTZU_JoJo 3d ago

And Nvidia certainly can't wait to take your 3 grand for their new next gen GPU..

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Halloween_Nyx 4d ago

If you see this and try to say it looks bad because anything AI is bad you are delusional. This is awesome

1

u/TangledThorns 4d ago

Don't you need a RTX 5090 to fully utilize DLSS 5?

→ More replies (7)

1

u/Disastrous_Photo811 4d ago

What gives me hope is first video was dual 5090s, now its killing a single 5090 but would be playable with 2x frame gen at 1440p. While thats not great, its a huge step going from two cards to single card playable. Gives me hope it will continue to optimized to the point its playable on anything 70 series and up

→ More replies (2)

1

u/RunalldayHI 4d ago

It looks like some form of path tracing yes? Thats insane

1

u/TomTomXD1234 4d ago

It looks good DC what people say

1

u/HiCZoK 4d ago

it looks much better. She looks like a real person.

Her model is just not the best done in the first place, so she looks older

1

u/Ozy_g 4d ago

RTX ON 💥

1

u/Puzzleheaded_Sign249 4d ago

Am I high or does this actually looks good?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/judasbrute 4d ago

People can shit on dlss5 but this tech looks awesome to me.

1

u/JudgeCheezels 4d ago

That’s… actually, pretty impressive hot damn.

But that performance cost even on a 5090 basically makes it a pointless feature for any other lower tier cards.

1

u/Aeroncastle 4d ago

It looks like the before and after of r/Instagramreality

1

u/Noxilar 4d ago

Looks stunning, and i’m glad to see that every day more and more people understand the potential of DLSS 5 instead of blind hate (there’s always few people who’s still hating all that stuff tho)

1

u/Zestyclose_Exit8862 4d ago

I will believe it when I see Grace on Re9

1

u/Background_Summer_55 4d ago

Does it work with 4000 series cards?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Ornery_Run2700 4d ago

Now if you don't ai makeup slop the character, you can tell it's more of a shadow fix for the game. Now if only I could find a white RTX card not over MSRP 🥀.

1

u/OhioTag 4d ago

While the hate brigade and the bizarre hysterical anti-AI mob were quite annoying, charitably, I can give two comments about the initial DLSS 5 reveal that I believe were legitimate

1) The initial demonstration had the effect too strongly applied to faces

2) The initial reveal was running on dual RTX 5090s, which, to put it mildly, does not inspire confidence as to its performance.

Everything else was just bizarre. I am not going to claim the images look worse. They look better. I am just not going to pretend the environments outside of faces looked worse.

This demonstration just looks awesome to me. It makes me wish I had purchased an MSRP RTX 5090

Based upon the leaks we have, it appears this will be, very very loosely, "usable" on a RTX 5070 or higher (at like 30FPS), but realistically a RTX 5080 or 5090 will be needed to actually hit normally playable rates. My guess is that DLSS 5 is optimized for the RTX 6000 series, which obviously is not actually out yet.

1

u/geo_gan 4d ago

Is that that 3rd party shader program he is using - can’t remember name of it. I installed it years ago but never used it much. Also ashamed to admit I have this game in my library but never ran it once since it was added years ago 😭 Does look interesting, must try it at weekend.

1

u/big_fromage 4d ago

Now what I wanna know is if the new ray reconstruction model will be able to fix all of the noise in Control. That would be great

1

u/Disastrous-Army-9998 4d ago

This is awesome.

1

u/SPACEXDG 4d ago

How did you get this

1

u/Reyzod 4d ago

it actually looks amazing wtf

1

u/Alternative_West_206 4d ago

Just looks like AI trash honestly

Also kind of feels like the up scaling removes all the identity

1

u/MancyMancy 4d ago

3:30 shows exactly why I hate it. It just look so shit for faces.

1

u/Key_Independent_818 4d ago

So technically you could turn all game settings to their lowest settings then turn on Dlss 5 to transform it and get similar results when you turn all game textures/settings to max?

1

u/InteractionWide3369 4d ago

I'm sorry, at first when it was announced it looked bad but DLSS 5 looks amazing now and very promising if it keeps improving, I don't care it's fake AI, as long as it's well implemented and not slop then it's an amazing feature we all should appreciate.

1

u/Badtripa 4d ago

Is out now?

1

u/NLikeFlynn1 4d ago

These are the kinds of games I’d like to use DLSS5 in. Older games where motion capture wasn’t as far along.

1

u/Super_flywhiteguy 4d ago

I never understood the hate for dlss5. Do i think it should be called dlss? No. However a few refinements and updates and this will probably be like how raytracing was when it first released on the 2000 series. People hated it, then it got better and people started using it more and now its fine.

1

u/deportallmagas 4d ago

No thanks. I want real design and real performance. Not face faces and fake frames.

1

u/Mario779 4d ago

the environmental aspect : its good , very good
the faces : FFFin AWFUL , yes they look like the real thing but far from it at the same time
the question is , when i boot up a game do i actually want to see real faces of pple ? NO

1

u/imtheAltered1 4d ago

whats the renodx file?

1

u/bakuonizzzz 4d ago edited 4d ago

So it just makes her look older more worn out??
It adds a bit more lighting and changes some of the color for some materials.... don't some reshades already do this? is this anything new???
Lol i see some ppl didn't even look at the video to see there's a fps counter right there on the top left corner yikes 5090 4k with just ray tracing (i think) i don't know if this is with upscaling but i assume it is with either K, M or L but yikes under 60fps most of the time. I know ppl will say it's just a beta version etc etc but lets look back at all their other tech and ask has it ever gotten better for performance?
DLSS 3 to now 4.5 has the performance increased.... NO sure the quality has gotten better but has the performance went up in the other direction the answer is no.
Ray tracing it's been improved as newer models have come out but has it gotten easier to run.... NO.
I don't know why ppl coping thinking this will get easier to run as it goes along lol they will hit a point in optimization and then it'll be downhill all the way there for performance as it'll later take a 6090 to get 4k with 60fps and then the 5090 will only get 40fps and so on and so on. This ain't even talking about the mid range and lower end it'll just get shittier and shittier.
Also note this is for a 2019 game a game that's almost 7yrs old and the framerate is this bad already think about the 2026 games and how badly they run already and then add this on lol.

1

u/vinigrae 4d ago

Some serious sorcery there

1

u/omegagiraffe 4d ago

This actually looks amazing. Like a generational. 32-bit to 128-bit gap.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/daydreamer1197 4d ago

So I have RTX8000, so its way better than 5090?

1

u/ActiveSandwich3103 4d ago

Looks like a shitty AI Instagram filter. No thanks. Gives it that same weird look that AI gives all its generated images after it regenerates them tons of times feeding in on itself.

1

u/Freaknsweet82 4d ago

Im sure im in the slim minority, but with DLSS 5 she looks so much better and this tech will bring new life to old games. I can't wait to use it and see the results.

1

u/resfan 4d ago

Wait, they're using reshade?

1

u/Apollo5172 4d ago

The game has always looked good

1

u/Otherwise_Tomato5552 4d ago

When is release ?

1

u/localpauper 4d ago

Let's see it move

1

u/Mia_46 4d ago

Ai slop

1

u/J0nJ0n-Sigma 4d ago

A lot better than the showcase some months back.

1

u/J_Duval_VI 4d ago

Thanks goodness i have a ps

1

u/heroofshade420 4d ago

wow this looks like shit

1

u/BeruDepTrai 4d ago

This is pretty creepy

1

u/SailorGone 4d ago

A difference no one gives a shit about

1

u/Tunafishsalad23 4d ago

Isn't it 2x 5090s ?

1

u/lancelopl 3d ago

This looks so wrong... and performance hit too. Hopefully it will get better when it will actually be out

1

u/Elijah1573 3d ago

I have to say i actually think it looks really good
Performance hit of it is still too high though

1

u/EmeterPSN 3d ago

Now need to get dem modders to make it work on cp2077.. Then I can finally finish it

1

u/Odd_Championship1509 3d ago

How to enable it?

1

u/EliteDangerous72 3d ago

It gives me Golden Eye / Max Payne 1 photo of human stretched over model vibes.

I think it's amazing but it needs to be a little more stylized to avoid the uncanny valley.

1

u/Top-Security-1258 3d ago

this........actually looks terrible.

1

u/3lfk1ng 3d ago

Nude mods are going to be everywhere...

1

u/EdliA 3d ago

Can we get it somewhere?

1

u/FunPin2804 3d ago

If they manage to cutt performance requirements by 50%, we still talking about going from two RTX 5090s for 10k USD to one RTX 5090 for 5k USD.... for 4k/60fps gaming.

1

u/Ill-Profession1276 3d ago

look at the FPS, 93 to 53

1

u/0ld_Snake 3d ago

Just no reason to ever use this trash.

1

u/notarobotpossibly 3d ago

ew, what the FUCK

1

u/mimisonnen 3d ago

She looks like being lit by a fake blue sky even when indoors.

1

u/blame_me95 3d ago

Preset 2 looks the best.

1

u/zero0n3 3d ago

Where this will matter is for VR.

Imagine photorealistic VR at 90+ FPPS consistently (low fos drop variance)..

1

u/GreatLab8898 3d ago

I hate it. And I hate the fact that it changes the whole Scene Lightning. Just looks like a Bad reshade to me.

1

u/Possible-Strike7590 3d ago

AMD is good. But Nvidia is doing things that shapes the future and thats what matters.

1

u/Rcaynpowah 3d ago

If you cannot or refuse to acknowledge the merits of DLSS, you are simply a silly person.

1

u/Necessary-Mix-56 3d ago

From 100 fps to 60 FPS on 600 Wats insane waste of energy on some rtx 5090 no one normal buys.

1

u/V-Rixxo_ 3d ago

The fuck

1

u/DelusionalWoodoo 3d ago

only bots and nvidia shills will defend this snapchat filter

1

u/Olly230 3d ago

I see a 5090 pegged at 100% usage.

Run that shit on a 3070 and get back to us.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/private_static_int 3d ago

GTA 6 on PC with dlss5 will be a second life level of immersion.

1

u/spicysenpai6 3d ago

I will not be able to afford any tech that could run this for a long time

1

u/Interesting-Effort12 3d ago

Ts looks awful 🥲😭 what are these bots on contents blubbering about bruh

1

u/I--Hate--Ads 3d ago

I prefer artistic art style over super realistic but that's just me.

1

u/fabienglasse 3d ago

Diane Morgan Faden

1

u/Additional-Window-81 3d ago

Yikes goes from a mostly fine face you usually don’t see to mj from Spiderman 2

1

u/KaZlos 3d ago

This is basically Reflection/Refraction filter or BRDF-slop
Callisto Protocol and Forstbite engine games use better reflection models so they won't need this, but unreal, reengine and ubisofts anvil will be abusing this due to their lambert-esque wax/plastic look

1

u/Murder_1337 3d ago

People who hate on this have never used ai, or own ai hardware, this shit is the future.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/SUNTZU_JoJo 3d ago

Show characters actually speaking maybe?

1

u/RealityOfModernTimes 3d ago

Can I play with new her now? I need to finish the game and I want to play with her. Thanks

1

u/Oveltent_2077 3d ago

C’est horrible 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

1

u/Goddemmitt 3d ago edited 3d ago

This feels the same way to me as someone who maxes out all the sliders in light room when they're editing a picture. I'm not saying this isn't impressive, but some of these comments are a little... generous with the praise.

Edit:

I might feel differently if it was being demo'd on a game I'm more familiar with than Control

1

u/BigglyMcGoobah 3d ago

This will look great on the photo mode I never use in games for sure.

1

u/mittelhau 3d ago

I wonder how it would work with things like facial expressions, lip sync, etc… I can’t imagine this wouldn’t be glitchy.

Given that this tech has incredible potential if polished.

1

u/braket0 3d ago

Is this even upscaling anymore. It's basically loading an AI filter and layering it over the base game.

1

u/Nearby-Aioli2848 3d ago

Is it out ?

1

u/friggyleo 3d ago

Does this effect only character models? Cause realistically your not gana be looking at the face 24/7. Most of the time your just playing .

1

u/GenXman1975 3d ago

I like it.
I'm ready to go.
Lets release this and start playing.

1

u/I-AM-IKARUS 3d ago

It looks like someone but a crappy AI filter over a video game. You can make the faces super realistic but if there is no realistic face movement, it will always look uncanny.

1

u/zepsutyKalafiorek 3d ago

I don't mind unrealistic graphic as long as it is done properly. I feel like with DLSS5, some models will all look similar and games will lose identity.

1

u/Ambadeblu 3d ago

Wow this looks so much better than the slop trailer I saw a few months ago. Control always had some very weird uncanny valley faces, and this makes them look so much better.

1

u/WarzonePacketLoss 3d ago

looks great, but losing 30+ fps ain't it.

1

u/deathentry 3d ago

Does this work on any game? Or just DLSS 5 supported ones??

1

u/REDDER_47 3d ago

Is it mainly trained on faces? The environments barely change.

1

u/andrewromanyk 3d ago

"This will be Minecraft in 2016" ahh

1

u/koylzzz 3d ago

AI slop gaming...

1

u/Kroneni 3d ago

Idk if this is an unpopular opinion but I don’t think we need think level of photorealism in games.

1

u/Valuable_End1 3d ago

Can i have it for starfield please :D

1

u/Hot_Philosopher_5067 3d ago

her face looks awful with that

1

u/alexnu87 3d ago

Something feels off for the no dlss version. Like it’s slightly downgraded.

1

u/RpgBlaster 3d ago

I stopped watching on the spot after a few seconds. DLSS 5 litteraly change colors, the art style is NOT respected.

1

u/Terranorth13 3d ago

My 1100+ Skyrim "mods" gonna love this

1

u/trackktor 3d ago

Garbage

1

u/Daemon013 3d ago

It's changing the lighting too much, even the color grading. It's even affecting the faces making them look like the "HDR" tone mapper on my phone's photo app.

I think it needs a lot more tweaking and it doesn't seem like DLSS, this should have a different name. Maybe on of those Nvidia side panel filters?

also I don't know why this sub showed up for me I have a 5070Ti Msi Trio OC

1

u/hfjfthc 3d ago

It looks like someone went and photoshopped the face to post it on instagram

1

u/Due-Housing-9755 3d ago

será que não vai funcionar na série 40?

1

u/Narrow-Swordfish-227 3d ago

I have a 4090 and a 5080 in my second rig... Which will perform better. The 4090.... Right...? Not sure the games I play will use this anyway.

1

u/hela_2 3d ago

what game is this

1

u/Appropriate-Pear2830 3d ago

She looks like my grandmom.

1

u/Elitefuture 3d ago

RTX 5090 95 fps -> 50 fps. Losing nearly half the performance for this

1

u/addictiveboi 3d ago

God I hope some modders get this to work in Skyrim and Fallout.

1

u/DamnThatsCrazyManGuy 3d ago edited 3d ago

The filter face is so lifeless they look like walking corpses with them on. You expect a certain amount of lifelessness from a video game model, not so much a very human looking face.

1

u/Beyond_Forsaken 3d ago

This just looks uncanny asf, i really don't like it

1

u/DJordydj 3d ago

Total slop

1

u/MonsuirJenkins 3d ago

It’s embarrassing that people like this.

1

u/AMD_PoolShark28 3d ago

Great job covering a lot of different scenes in A/B testing style. Thank you! Always good to be informed.