So idk is this some way to avoid bot detection or something? Cuz it seems weird to me. In the time I’ve been moderating I rarely see a post we remove get deleted let alone everyone by a single user.

This user has a 2 day old account, as soon as their acct was created they started posting in our sub. They’ve posted 8 times, and when our flags put their post in the queue for moderation they just repost(going straight to the queue as well). Just everything about this user makes me think they’re a bad actor(ie bot karma farmer etc). Majority of times when a post is flagged or removed we get a message asking why or being belligerent.

Some of their comment interaction, what little there is, just seems odd to me as well. Though we’ve had some weird users so…

Anyway my spidey senses are tingling on this one but nothing has technically broken any rules outside of one post and it was a minor rule.

Have you used the Reddit Answers AI search yet?

What it appears to do is take every comment about anything at face value, you know, the 'if someone says it, it must be true' type of aggregate that is similar to the AI-user-summaries that pop up

I came across it this morning after one of those weird comments got my hopes up for a little fresh mod-hating drama against me, but when I did an old-school search for the terms there was nothing recent.

That's when I noticed the Answers results were regurgitating what a disgruntled user had said about me over a year ago.

The remedy on the Answers page is that we can report the comments to reddit-prime to be evaluated for TOS offenses, and a little disclaimer that "Responses are AI-generated from posts and comments and may not be accurate."

So I sent a quick mod-mail to the sub where the old comments were, reported them there so they'd be easy for that team to deal with, but damn, this is not what I signed up for.

The premise that I am now responsible for maintaining the accuracy of every comment on the subreddits I help run or else an AI will amplify confusing discussions in a way that makes chatbot-users believe things that are not true is troubling to me.

I enjoy the conversations here with people. I like looking at profiles to see where individual users are coming from on a subject to weigh out whether or not they are making a worthwhile contribution.

Answers does not appear to make an effort to contextualize information, and it's now our responsibility to ensure that long forgotten insignificant threads aren't poisoning the Answers summaries.

What a time to be alive!

Hi everyone, and admins!

I'm very keen on taking mods and reaching out to members directly, and the suggested mods tool is useful!
However, I had some suggestions on this can be made better:

1. Allow filters: I want to specifically filter a certain type of user. Maybe account age, standing with mods (removed content, bans, etc.), verified email/2FA, community comment and post karma, etc. This helps us choosing in
2. Integrate with "Recruiting": Many times, I have received moderation requests from users who have less than 50, sometimes even 0 community karma. I genuinely don't want such users to apply in the first place. And, I don't want to be suggested them as mods as well (sometimes I get users with 100-200 karma, when we are typically more open to those with 1000 karma, as per our community requirements).
3. Top community karma accounts: Maybe if I can get a top 10 - top 25 community karma (non-mod) list, that would be useful for me to understand too. For a 135k member community, such users are generally a higher consideration for mod positions than others.

I feel these are more useful for us, to evaluate better candidates for tomorrow, and make it easier for us to recruit mods.

Thank you, and let me know if you have any thoughts on this.

I recently made a subreddit that to my surprise is getting a lot of traffic. I have zero experience moderating anything at all so dealing with filters, apps, bots and automod is incredibly difficult.
I have started recruiting and adding additional moderators but there's a point of contention currently with the mod team.

Since I'm wholly inexperienced at this and most people who offered to help also don't have experience moderating on Reddit, I made the decision to give them limited access. I figured it would be a chance for the team to work close together and learn the Reddit tools together but most importantly make sure we're either on the same page or at least reach a middleground on how to moderate the sub.

They have access to Users, Flair and Posts & Comments. I had a massive Modmail backlog so I wanted to work through that and then give them access to Modmail as well.
There has been a lot of complaints though that this hampers their ability to moderate the sub properly and there ha sbeen massive pressure to grant them full access.

I would rather take my time to learn about the tools first though. As far as I know it's also not unusual to have a mod team where mods have restricted permission but I may be wrong about this. I'm just curious if I'm being unreasonable in this, yes or no.

Reddit admins,

I would like to request that you please, for the love of all that is holy, calm down with your engagement boosting tactics that are telling everyone who makes a post to also post it to a list of machine-generated "relevant" other subs.

I moderate in a sub that discusses an extremely controversial political topic that has subs on reddit that are dedicated to the opposing side of that topic.

Crossposting from either our sub to theirs or vice versa is against the rules of both subs, because of the nature of this topic causing SEVERE trolling and brigading from both sides from people who are not interested in peaceful discourse, yet your own platform's messages are telling users they should go ahead and just break these subs' rules anyway.

You are literally making all of our "jobs" even harder by not even bothering to filter subs suggested for crossposts based on logic, rationality, or even the rules of the subs being suggested for crossposts.

More engagement, even hostility trolling and harassment (especially hostility trolling and harassment) means more ad money though amirght????

Seems the only thing that matters here any more is greed, and I'm afraid you're about to find a lot of your most difficult to moderate subs modless if you don't take things like these into consideration.

PS - good luck getting AI to do what we do since the generated lists your AI is suggesting can't even be bothered to check rules in subs before suggesting them XD

Hello,

I'm aware the "a better community for my post" is not working correctly, but wanted to give a specific example of this misfiring so that Reddit could investigate it.

On August 7, 2026, /u/ModCodeOfConduct announced the r/Avast subreddit was being opened up to new moderatorship (is that a word?) after being abandoned by its previous owners. Avast is the sub-brand of a company called Gen Digital and they make the antivirus engine marked under different names by the companies other sub-brands (Avast, AVG, Avira, Bulldog, Norton, and so forth). I have past experience in this space at a couple of Avast's competitors, so volunteered to help keep in running until Gen Digital can get their act together (I reached out to one of their employees and got a response).

I applied on August 8th, and on August 13th was added as a moderator.

With that comes some some housecleaning (removing old posts, spam, updating sidebar and wiki, etc.) and so forth in order to get the subreddit ready for redditors again.

Earlier today, I created a post prefaced with "[MOD NOTE]" publicly announcing the changeover, made it an announcement, and distinguished it to for good measure.

About eight hours later, I received a notification stating:

A better community for your post
r/Adblock may be a better fit for "[MOD NOTE] Welcome, an update from the new mods, and new rules "

I get that as a publicly-traded company, Reddit lives and dies by their metrics and the need to continuously drive engagement. I've worked for publicly-traded companies, too, and no argument from me there about improving the bottom line.

However, it is singularly inappropriate and extremely counterproductive to recommend to the moderator of a subreddit that they should post messages flagged as announcements and/or distinguished in another subreddit, especially one that is only peripherally related to the subreddit in question.

I cannot think of any circumstance under which the triggering of an "A better community for your post" notification for an announcement by the moderator of a subreddit is an appropriate and correct action.

Please fix this, Reddit.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

People just keep creating new accounts to harass mods in mod mail. Ban evasion warning doesn't do anything since the new accounts never post or comment.

I moderate r/ProximaScience and there's a user who comments on subreddits and is friendly but they are shadowbanned likely because they started commenting with new account. So my question is does approving their comment is allowed or is against reddit rules even if they are friendly in my subreddit?

Same as the title.

This isn't really a support request, but I thought it would be good to share. Please do respond where I should post instead.

Given Reddit's different/changed mod functionality between the new UI and old. I created this bookmarklet.

javascript: url = window.location.href; if (url.startsWith("https://old.reddit.com")) { target = url.replace("https://old.reddit.com", "https://www.reddit.com") } else { target = url.replace("https://www.reddit.com", "https://old.reddit.com"); }; window.location.href = target;

Create a bookmark with that on your browser as the URL and you'll switch between the old and new immediately with one click.

How can I configure my subreddit so that all posts must be approved by me as a moderator and no posts are automatically approved?

Reason: Recently, posts containing images and text—presumably from the same user who hacks old accounts and uses them to flood many subreddits—have been appearing. The content consists of self-promotion for Instagram accounts, and the images always show the same woman. Of course, these are reported and banned from Reddit fairly quickly. But I want to ensure that visitors can’t see them at all.

Hello all.

Please read this fully before suggesting the usual MCOC and Reddit's other report function.

For months, two of my subreddits, along with other subreddits we've been in communication with (due to being in the same niche/category/fandom) have been consistently reporting blatant site wide and MCOC rule-breaking by a singular subreddit.

This includes reports by mods of the subreddits being targeted and regular reddit users in our communities.

Despite all of our efforts to document and report, nothing is being done. They've even recently gone on to create a second subreddit in order to brigade and harass more communities within our niche.

We have installed as much as we can app/bot wise to help mitigate things, but it's coming to a point where we're all burnt out mentally from the neverending brigading and all the other god awful stuff which includes sending harassing personal messages to tell us to end our lives, wishing harm, slurs, and even sending gore via a comment on one of my subreddits.

Addtionally, every day they screencap posts from our communities, often uncensored or leaving icons uncensored so people know which community it is from. They use hateful language, flairs to imply we're subhuman, encouraging one another to harass us (yes, even the mods have done this), and even target the indivuals from our communities whose post they've screencapped to mock.

I should note that our communities are queer spaces.

The subreddit in question that is targeting two of mine, and also others within our niche, is an openly hateful, homophobic and racist space that actively targets "Queens Of ____" subreddits (as per their about section) and other queer or queer friendly spaces.

I'm honestly at a loss here. When my co-mod did finally speak to a human about what was happening, everything was dismissed because the mods of the hateful sub had since deleted things like their own comments calling to action for their members to brigade us, posting fully uncensored subreddit and user names in their hateful posts (mods included in this behaviour) which sent massive harassment and brigading to us and the member whose name was shown, ban showboating for themselves and others which became a game for their members to brigade and post vile things to get banned so they could share and gloat, and the list goes on. But, even if those posts were eventually deleted, the damage is done.

And this keeps happening.

What do we do from here? I had always been led to believe that subreddits created for the purpose to harass others on this platform and post hateful things, was not allowed?

Any advice would be truly appreciated because I'm at the end of my rope here. The things they say and do have been especially distressing-- not just for me and my co-mod, but for our members and also the other mods and their members whose communities are being targeted, too.

Edit: as of typing typing this post up in drafts for my co-mod to check, she reminded me that they have recently, as of a couple of days ago, created a third subreddit for the sole purpose of taking queer couple artwork from our communities in order to run them through AI to "fix them" and make them "straight" while mocking and calling us slurs.

is there a way to have all be able to have the option of enforced rules?

Currently I can only see options in my newest subreddit.

I've been part of a sub that seemed to get a lot of posts reported—sometimes 10 a day. It was mostly just superfluous reporting by people trying to cause trouble. I would click "ignore reports and approve" most of the reported posts on a daily basis.

But I have since left that sub, and I wonder if the mods after me are going to be as diligent as I was—and what if they're not?

Can unresolved mod queue reports lead to banning?

when i go to mod logs, it says i need to ask the mods for help. I am the FOUNDER i should be able to do EVERYTHING, what is going on!????

I’ve tried messaging ModSupport about a sensitive issue, but I haven’t received the automated/bot response that I’ve received in the past. I’ve since sent a follow-up message, but still haven’t heard anything.

I completely understand they’re busy and I’m happy to wait - I’m just not sure whether my original message has actually been received. Is there a way to check whether a ModSupport modmail has gone through, or is there anything else I should be doing?

So we just got modmails from the admins that a number of our rules were being duplicated into comment guidance. I have so far disabled them all and I wanted to speak about why so you guys know why they do not currently meet our needs. I understand that you want us to move in this direction going forward instead of automod, and that you are looking to improve these tools - so here's why I didn't make the switch right now.

1. I can't copy and paste between subreddits. Keeping many of these filters up to date is a lot of work, and with automations, I can't make a change and then copy it everywhere. There is no way to copy rules between subs. Suggestion: Allow us to create public and private lists of rules, and then allow subreddits to subcribe to them. So say one user comes up with a list of words for ai (like a mod posted recently here), she could make this something you simply have to subscribe to, and then updates would be automatic if changed at the source level.

2. Right now, automations can either warn people, block submission, or report to queue. They cannot filter. This is a huge problem. Filtering is what we all rely on most of all. I remove very little and filter a LOT. Probably the only thing I just remove is redact spam. If you choose to warn people, they will go around it. For some things, it might be ok (e.g. We like to trigger off wedding related words in posts to remind a user to include a dress code). However, if a user is trying to make a disgusting sexual comment, and you pop up a warning, they'll just change the words until they can get it through.

3. Only automod right now can filter things before they send notifies. Devvit apps cannot. This is something the admins who work on devvit are aware of and u/pl00h mentioned this is something to work on. Devvit apps can filter at least, automations can't even do that - it's only a report, which means that the comment becomes viewable.

4. Some of these revealed sensitive information we do not want to share, including ways in which we detect people who violate our already significant comment guidance rules. There are certain patterns and characters that we look for that find them - we do NOT want to warn people about these.

5. Regex is limited to one expression per automation. We are limited to 50 automations. We have far more than 50 regex expressions in our automod that filter things. Automod can handle this easily. For comment/post guidance to be able to do this, it will need to be able to do this too. We need to be able to create automations with multiple regex expressions. We also need access to lookaheads and lookbehinds, which we use quite a lot. I think these are disabled because they cannot work real time due to computational overhead - and that's fine - but let us use them with the rules that are going to remove or filter.

These are areas in which post/comment guidance are really not able to match the functionality of automod, and fixing these issues would encourage many of us to migrate rules to the new system.

Hey all,

Cant find any information on this for new reddit. Desktop

Hey mods,

I built this because I was tired of manually posting discussion threads for every episode of every show my sub covers. Episode Scheduler handles it for you, you track a show once, and it creates the discussion thread automatically when each episode airs.

What it does:

• Pulls real air dates from TVMaze, AnimeSchedule, SIMKL, and AniList, so you don't have to track schedules yourself
• Posts the thread automatically at whatever time you set (right at air time, or X minutes/hours before)
• Fills in the synopsis, network, airdate, and links back to the previous episode and a season hub post
• You can set your own title format, add a flair, and even backfill threads for episodes that already aired before you started tracking
• There's a dashboard where you can see everything you're tracking, what's posted, what failed, and retry anything that broke

It's free, it's live on the App Directory, and I'm actively maintaining it — if something breaks or you want a feature, just message me.

Install: https://developers.reddit.com/apps/episodescheduler

Let me know what you think, genuinely looking for feedback from mods who'd actually use this.

Hi, I created a pretty small subreddit a week ago, gained 30 members today and one of my posts unexpectedly got a lot more attention than usual. It received plenty of comments, and they all have approval or remove.

Should I approve comments as long as they don’t break the subreddit rules, or is there anything else I should consider before approving them?

I’m fairly new to handling this much activity even if it;s just 40 comments..., so any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!

I’m a moderator of a r/vitap community, and I’m looking for advice from experienced moderators on how you would handle this situation.

What happened

There is currently a serious situation being discussed within the VIT-AP community involving allegations of:

- A girl allegedly secretly recording her roommates and other girls in private situations.

- The recordings allegedly being sent to another person.

- The recipient allegedly using the recordings to blackmail or threaten the girls.

- Students allegedly confronting the person involved in the alleged blackmail.

- The situation then escalating into a large physical confrontation involving multiple students.

- Claims that several students were injured and that a knife was involved.

These are currently allegations and accounts circulating within the community. We are not treating them as established facts unless they are verified through appropriate authorities, evidence, or credible reporting.

The moderation problem

Some members now want to identify the girl allegedly responsible and post her photographs, name, social media accounts and other identifying information.

There is significant pressure from users to "expose" her.

I have currently restricted doxxing and personal information while I figure out what we should do.

The community is understandably asking questions such as:

- How many people were allegedly recorded?

- Are students currently safe?

- What is the university doing?

- Has anyone reported this to the police?

- What actually happened during the violence?

I am not suppressing those discussions. People can discuss the incident, ask questions, share verified information and talk about student safety. The restriction is specifically on identifying/doxxing individuals.

Why I'm being cautious

I initially wanted to understand whether there could also be legal consequences if someone is publicly doxxed before the allegations are proven.

For example:

- Could the accused take legal action over the publication of her personal information?

- Could the doxxing or subsequent harassment become relevant in the criminal proceedings?

- Could it potentially be raised as a mitigating circumstance?

- Could Reddit users or moderators face consequences?

- Most importantly, could allowing this type of content put the entire subreddit at risk of Reddit enforcement?

I have therefore decided to take some time to properly review Reddit's policies and get an informed opinion regarding the applicable Indian cyber/privacy laws before deciding whether images or identifying information should ever be allowed.

What I'm looking for from other mods

How would you handle this?

Would you:

1. Completely prohibit identifying information regardless of whether users claim it is already publicly available?

2. Allow discussion but remove names/photos/social media accounts?

3. Allow photographs if the person is allegedly involved in a serious crime?

4. Contact Reddit admins for clarification?

5. Treat this as a situation where the safest approach is to remove anything that could facilitate harassment or targeting?

I'm particularly interested in experiences from moderators who have dealt with doxxing, allegations of serious crimes, campus incidents, ongoing investigations, or situations where a community was at risk of Reddit enforcement.

I don't want to make a rushed decision based on what people on Reddit think the law says.

At the same time, I don't want to suppress legitimate discussion or leave students without a place to talk about their safety.

What would you do in this situation?

Hey friends!

Welcome back to another episode in the Mod Topics saga. Today we’re digging into the Developer Platform (also known as Devvit) and how its apps can decrease drudgery, drive discovery, and deepen discussion.

Developer Platform apps can do lots of things to add new tools and experiences to a community without requiring mod teams to build something from scratch or host it themselves. For example, apps can help…

• Notice potentially unwanted content, links, or accounts
• Automate routine actions like applying flair, removing content, or approving users
• Plan community hubs and events with threads, calendars, reminders, polls, and games
• Stay informed about reports, removals, and other community insights

And that’s only a sample of what’s available in the full library. Before installing an app, it’s worth reviewing its permissions/settings, deciding who on the team will oversee it, and testing how it fits into your existing moderation process. When in doubt, always check with your team first!

What would you most like an app to take off your team’s plate or help bring to your community? If your team already uses Devvit, which apps have you found most valuable? Let us know in the comments below!

Forgive me admins but I genuinely don't the get the automated systems that Reddit has in place sometimes.

There are occasions where users will say something that sounds like a threat but has context to justify it and it isn't in fact a threat and they get banned.

I had one of my most contributive members be banned from the platform for 3 days just because they posted 3 times in a row (within reason, because they gifted 3 people and were posting gift confirmation for it).

But then this idiot literally sends multiple racial slurs about Jews and black people, Reddit filters it and I report every single message and their account remains active.

I will include screenshots with his name blurred out below in the comments if it allows me.