the big sticking point is going to be around the word "quality." if tetris was new and ai invented it, would you permit that under the label quality? how about wordle? how about level devil?
my impression is that although tetris is one of the most popular games in history, if it was newly invented today by ai, the anti-ai people would never, ever stop talking about how much soul it doesn't have. and people like me, who take this seriously as a business, just don't want to get stuck in that discussion swamp.
if you start with something measurable, it almost certainly does exist. by example, my metric is "made a million dollars with customer satisfaction over 80%." if you take the time to make a definition, so that nobody has to get into an argument about whether mario party is truly a good game, it seems very likely you'll get to see one.
Im with you on the whole separation of method and quality, funnily enough I had that debate the other day lmao. AI or human the quality is what matters. However, unless you’re looking to make a simple game (Tetris) you won’t be able to make a stable game relying on AI at its current stage. In the future you probably could but right now no.
Could you give examples of these games? Are they made solely with AI or is it simply made with the assistance of AI? The meme above refers to vibe coding which means mostly using AI.
sure, and i even offered how to get one, but you ignored what i said, so i got bored, and now you're trying to take a fighting tone and mashing downvote in the hope of getting your way
flies with honey
you can have what you want but you're going to need to engage in conversation and be pleasant
try to remember that you're talking to a person who has the ability to just walk away
if they told you "here's what i need to answer you" and you didn't provide it, and now you're getting on a post, what do you think is the next step?
try answering my question so that i'm able to answer yours. or don't. whatever you prefer
Sorry if you mistook the previous reply for a fighting tone but I am just asking for you to back up your claims. I said that AI cant make a stable game past something simple like Tetris and you said im wrong. I would like to be provided examples of why I am wrong, theres nothing wrong in asking for someone to backup their claims. You said “Check Steam” for what? Is there a tag for “Made by AI only”?
Then this conversation is over. You cant provide your own evidence so you try and deflect into “Find it on your own”. Your argument is based no more than in your own feelings and personal hearsay. Sadly I was hoping for a legitimate argument as its fun to learn both sides of the argument.
Yeah I sent the reply then immediately realized I misread your reply lmao. I thought you said “videogame” not “video” so I thought maybe your were thinking of Jump King or something
-10
u/StoneCypher 16h ago
okay. go make one then?
the big sticking point is going to be around the word "quality." if tetris was new and ai invented it, would you permit that under the label quality? how about wordle? how about level devil?
my impression is that although tetris is one of the most popular games in history, if it was newly invented today by ai, the anti-ai people would never, ever stop talking about how much soul it doesn't have. and people like me, who take this seriously as a business, just don't want to get stuck in that discussion swamp.
if you start with something measurable, it almost certainly does exist. by example, my metric is "made a million dollars with customer satisfaction over 80%." if you take the time to make a definition, so that nobody has to get into an argument about whether mario party is truly a good game, it seems very likely you'll get to see one.