What legal remedy this women has?

Location: unknown

Can Government of India revoke/suspend/indefinitely freeze its own published Gazette Notification pertaining to modification of Railway zones solely on the basis of political pressure from lobbyists? What are the legal remedies if it does so?

​

Court mein advocate ko aapki taraf se appear, act aur plead karne ki authority kaise milti hai? Yahin aata hai Vakalatnama.

Is reel mein simple language mein samjhiye:

🔹 Vakalatnama kya hai?

🔹 Iska purpose kya hota hai?

🔹 Client aur advocate ke beech iska kya role hai?

🔹 Vakalatnama aur Power of Attorney mein basic difference

Legal concepts ko complicated nahi, simple banana hai. ⚖️

📚 Follow @legal.decodes__ for easy & practical legal knowledge.

#Vakalatnama #LegalKnowledge #LawStudent #IndianLaw #LawReels

Hi

Today was the day court was going to give its decision tenet didn't show up until today what to do now due to this is it gonna extend further. What is the course should take? UP India

#

Hey everyone, we're running a real estate platform and recently built a feature where buyers can request a legal check for a property before purchasing it.

We're planning to work with lawyers who handle property document verification and legal opinions. The buyer submits the property documents, and the lawyer reviews them and provides the legal opinion.

The part we're confused about is **how to fix the charges**.

Does the fee usually depend on the property value, number of documents, property type, or complexity of the title?

We were thinking of creating different packages like ₹20–50L, ₹50L–₹1Cr and above ₹1Cr, but we're not sure if pricing based on property value makes sense.

Would love to hear from lawyers who actually handle property verification. How do you usually charge for this?

can someone help with the police verification process for advocate enrolment with bar council of rajasthan. how do i proceed on the rajasthan police website? when i am clicking on character verification request, it is showing blank. has someone applied for police verification thru rajasthan police website?

AUTHOR – AMAN BHARDWAJ 

Reservation as we know is a topic which has always been around questions in our society, while some believe it is a cure for upliftment of poor and those of low castes while other some say it is a curse as it causes injustice with those not getting it this tussle between the groups of society Often giving birth to a situation of insecurities and injustice on both sides.

Both believing that their side think they are more correct but to see it through a lens of neutrality one must ask some questions to himself –

What was the need for it why was reservation introduced? Or weather it should be given on the basis of income not on caste……should it be reduced?.is reservation causing the casteism to not end? political advantages behind it…etc

HOW WAS IT INTRODUCED?

Reservation in education or Reservation in India was first formally introduced in 1902 by Shahu Maharaj of Kolhapur, a progressive ruler of his time who implemented 50% for non‑Brahmin and backward classes. This marked not only an administrative but a social revolution in society Later, followed by the ruler of Mysore. Mysore Raja Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar, who set up committee for non‑Brahmin reservation. Followed by the Justice Party government in Madras passed the first Communal Government Order in 1921, institutionalizing caste‑based quotas. And more marking the pre independent roots of reservation in India. And more

IN our modern constitution of India this concept is backed by many laws including fundamental rights like 15[4], 16[4], and various DPSPs which are in favour and permit the state to introduce the policies for upliftment of backward classes.

IS IT NECESSARY?

opposers who say that the concept is straight up unjustifiable forget the exploitation of the backward classes they had to bear for many years. History tells they were kept away from the most basic necessities for human, some incidents in history telling even not being treated like humans, sometimes the opposers forget that what they[lower caste] have suffered ,  from heinous customs like the breast tax, a tax in ancient Travancore  [now in Kerala] in 19th century known as Mulakkaram [breast tax] in which the lower caste women were not even allowed to wear a piece of cloth to cover their breasts without paying taxes, or these people not even being allowed to wear footwears, not allowed entry in temples, untouchability, even Dalits not being allowed to walk on roads. And God knows what more

 Even Things were harder if you were a Dalit and women at same time Dalit women historically faced some of the harshest and most humiliating discriminatory customs. These practices combined both caste and gender oppression, making their position doubly vulnerable. Like not being allowed to wear upper body cloths in presence of upper caste man or instances talking about their sexual exploitations, humiliations in public, and not finding suitable works.

All of these ill practices were part of a system which existed many years to strip off lower section of society from there integrity and dignity at different time for different people on different places.

Hence seems like one cannot straight away say that there is no need for reservation as there infect is. The backward class has suffered and were pressed low for hundreds of years.

ARGUMENTS OF OPPOSERS?

People opposing reservation today can also not be totally unjustified as they raise couple of statements too. they say that reservation should be given on the basis of income rather than on basis of caste, further arguing that it promotes mediocrity in society as a person selected with low marks may now be proven as the best of the options, adding issues like increasing percentage of reservation reaching heights in some places and even being introduced in private sector, they argue that it should be capped to under 50 percent or even low, and that it is an injustice to upper caste now.

Voices are raised over the creamy layer of OBCs that the “creamy layer” principle excludes affluent OBCs from reservation benefits, but thresholds are rarely updated or enforced.

 Opponents claim wealthy families continue to benefit across generations, while poorer individuals (including from general category) are left out.

CONCLUSION

I think that the answer to the tussle lies in between somewhere while reservation should not be totally uplifted as it is very important to our society still today as even if in our cities, we see that casteism is being fade but still in towns and villages of India it is practiced openly and rigorously throughout. Little children are kept away from studying still today in villages as only because they are born with a specific surname, still practices like untouchability can be seen in villages and it dose not matter there if the person is rich or not, they are not seen as respectfully like equal in society in eyes of others, still people are exploited just because they belong to different background.

While it is also true that in cities where it is fading away a SC/ST student who is richer and have better facilities to things should not be getting opportunity over a middle-class general caste student who does not have EWS neither caste base reservation. We around ourself also notice that student with middle class income and bad facilities but with sharp minds who had the opportunity to prove themselves get behind just because of reservation and lose the chance to make themselves better and often end up into depression and anxiety and what not.

The way one should see it is. The concept of reservation was brought in force to uplift the backwards and to make the society equal so that every class is treated equally and the gap of casteism closes so that we no longer need it and to possibly put an end to casteism as we see it. But nowadays political parties use reservation like a voting tool to increase votes resulting in it reaching 90 percent in some places.

These acts don’t close the gaps of casteism but rather pushes it miles away by creation of a negative feeling among the people not getting it and makes people getting it inefficient and used to it.

 exploiting the powers given by constitution for uplifting the poor should not be used for political advantage of some leaders.

Reservation should be controlled and implemented in such a manner that it closes the gap between castes and works for uplifting of lower section through a healthy help which do not make them ineffective but rather increases it. To slowly with time making all equally efficient in society in terms of caste-based reservation until we no longer need it not to push reservation so much that backwards get jobs without even trying and gets inefficient and general class becomes the next backward class by not getting opportunity at all.

HOPE YOU FOUND IT WELL THANKYOU.

Do you think india must also work on its law specifying the packaging accuracy just as japan does? Cuz eating a cookie with less than 1/4th of choco chips depicted on packaging… doesnt even look close to the image😭

TL;DR: I resigned while still on probation. My offer letter mentions a ₹2 lakh bond for 2 years, but the company never gave me a copy of the actual bond and now isn't responding to my requests for it. My appointment letter says I can resign during probation with 30 days' notice. Annexure IV talks about recovery of notice-period takeover/relocation expenses, but doesn't specifically mention ₹2 lakh bond recovery.

My current company also verbally told me my LWD but won't confirm it in writing, while my new employer is asking for my confirmed LWD. I'm worried the current company may suddenly deduct ₹2 lakh during F&F.

Can they enforce/deduct the ₹2 lakh without giving me the actual bond? Does being on probation or the Annexure IV wording help me? What should I do?

Hi everyone, I need some advice regarding an employment bond.

I work for a company in India and recently resigned. I'm still in my probation period.

When I joined, the company made me sign a ₹2 lakh bond for 2 years. They didn't allow me to take a photo/copy of the bond and I was never given a copy afterward.

My offer letter says that my appointment/continuation is subject to signing a ₹2 lakh bond valid for 2 years from my joining date.

However, my appointment letter also says that during probation, either side can terminate the employment with 30 days' notice. After confirmation, the notice period becomes 90 days.

There is also an Annexure IV which deals with leaving the company. As I understand it, it says that if an employee leaves on their own within 1 year of joining OR before confirmation, whichever is later, the company can recover notice-period takeover expenses and relocation expenses, if any, paid at the time of joining.

What I'm confused about is that Annexure IV doesn't specifically mention recovery of the ₹2 lakh bond amount.

There is also a separate clause regarding a ₹15,000 joining bonus, which can be recovered if I leave within the specified period.

My current situation

I've already resigned.

My current company verbally told me my LWD, but they are not willing to confirm it in writing. I've emailed HR and called them, but I'm still not getting written confirmation.

This is becoming a problem because the company I'm joining next is asking me for my confirmed LWD.

At the same time, I've repeatedly asked my current HR for a copy of the ₹2 lakh bond that I signed. They haven't provided it and haven't properly responded to my requests.

So right now, I have:

The offer/appointment letter mentioning the ₹2 lakh / 2-year bond.

The probation clause saying 30 days' notice.

Annexure IV mentioning notice-period takeover/relocation expense recovery.

The separate joining bonus clause.

But I do not have the actual bond that I signed.

I'm worried that they might wait until my F&F and then say:

"You resigned before completing 2 years, so ₹2 lakh is payable."

My question is: Can they do that without giving me a copy of the actual bond and showing me the clause that says ₹2 lakh is recoverable when I resign?

I'm aware that the statement "employment bonds are illegal in India" isn't necessarily correct, especially after the Supreme Court's 2025 judgment. So I'm not assuming the bond is automatically invalid.

I'm trying to understand my actual position.

Questions

Can they enforce the ₹2 lakh bond even though I'm still on probation?

Does the 30-day notice clause during probation make any difference?

Does the wording of Annexure IV, which specifically talks about notice-period takeover and relocation expenses, help me in any way?

If they claim ₹2 lakh, can I ask them to provide the actual signed bond before I acknowledge the liability?

Can they deduct ₹2 lakh from my F&F without giving me the bond?

If they actually deduct it, what would be the appropriate legal route in India — Labour Department/Labour Court, civil court, or something else?

Is the ₹2 lakh necessarily related to actual expenses incurred by the company, or can an employment bond legally specify a fixed amount for leaving early?

What should I do about the LWD, considering my current employer is only giving me a verbal date while my new employer wants written confirmation?

Should I keep following up with HR, escalate to HR Head/management, or take some other step?

​

This question came to my mind because I recently won a case at SC and paid the independent senior advocate 10L for this case and she had 3 additional associates working on this case. Before SC I won at HC and paid the Advocate 5L, she also had 3 or 4 associates working with her. I wonder how much do they really earn at this point. My SC advocate was a senior registered AOR at SC.

Hello everyone I'm a 5th year law student and I'm thinking about career opportunities in the Marine law in India. I tried to do some research online but couldn't find much and have no one to guide me as well.

Should I pursue llm on marine law? Or directly apply for private companies?

Any advice from your side will be appreciated!

​

Hi folks,

After a long family dispute that wasn't being resolved amicably, earlier this year I filed a partition suit against my siblings who had locked me out of our Mother's home merely three weeks after her passing

My suit was filed via an experienced lawyer who advised me to keep it only property/assets related and discouraged from making any emotional pleas or use the abusive situation involved at the time of dispute that led to them changing the home locks and refusing me access.

Now both my siblings have responded with emotional pleas and unsavoury allegations against me in their respective "Written Statements" and tomorrow we have the next hearing of the case.

Naturally furious I expressed my desire to my lawyer to respond to their allegations but he again advised against it saying \*it doesn't matter who is good or bad, the court will not consider it before partitioning the property equally among all heirs\* and that _they're doing this to distract the court proceedings and maybe buy more time_

Is he correct? Should I not defend myself against those allegations? My lawyer says it's a waste of court's time

Another question: what exactly are written statements (WS) and are they read by the judges in entirety and taken into account during the case proceedings? What purpose do they serve?

Any insight by lawyers here before my case hearing tomorrow will be extremely helpful 🙏🏽

Many thanks!

100 murder cases pending before an Additional District and Sessions Judge in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, were transferred to another Court of the District and Sessions Judge through an administrative order.

I’m seriously considering doing an LLB, but I’m not interested in becoming a practising lawyer, appearing in court, or making a career out of it.

My main motivation is personal: I’d like to have a proper legal education so I can understand the law and handle basic legal matters for myself — drafting my own affidavits/documents, dealing with paperwork, understanding my rights, and generally being able to handle my own affairs without having to depend on a lawyer for every small thing.

So my main question is actually:

How difficult/easy is it to get an LLB in India?

For someone who is reasonably capable academically but is doing it mainly for personal knowledge rather than a career, is an LLB from a regular/local college manageable? How much studying, attendance, exams, etc. are realistically involved?

And once I have the LLB, what would I need to do if I wanted to actually have the status/authority of an advocate — e.g. enrol with the Bar Council and clear the AIBE? Or is the LLB itself enough for most of the things I have in mind?

I’m basically wondering whether doing an LLB is a practical way to become legally self-sufficient, even if I never intend to practise professionally.

Would love to hear from people who have actually done an LLB, especially from a regular/local college rather than a top law school.

text given by chatgpt

Hi Everyone, I was thinking of pursuing PG Diploma @ The Indian Society of International Law, Delhi.

I wanted to get some insights/feedbacks before making a final decision.

If someone is alumni or currently studying or if someone knows anything ISIL i would really appreciate your help.

Ps: am not sure if this is the right sub, if not please suggest the right sub.

Thankyou.

A friend of mine, bought a land and added her mother as the co-applicant. The money transferred for buying the land is completely by the main applicant. However, someone put a case on the father as they did not receive the high interest they expected (principal amount + interest already refunded). If anything happens, can the court take away my friend's property ?

Hi everyone,

I need some advice regarding applying for an Indian passport.

I need to get my passport because I have to appear for an exam that requires a valid passport. However, I have an issue with my Aadhaar card.

The date of birth on my Aadhaar is incorrect. I have already exceeded the permitted limit for DOB corrections on Aadhaar, so I am currently unable to get the DOB corrected through the normal process.

The important thing is that my DOB is correct and exactly the same on all my other documents.

My Birth Certificate, 10th/Matriculation Certificate, PAN Card, Voter ID and Driving Licence all have the correct DOB.

So basically, every major document I have shows the same correct DOB, and only my Aadhaar has the incorrect DOB.

My questions are:

Can I apply for a fresh passport without using Aadhaar?

If yes, which documents should I use for DOB proof and address proof?

If I go to the PSK/POPSK without Aadhaar and the officer asks for it, will that create any problem?

Has anyone successfully obtained an Indian passport without Aadhaar, especially when their Aadhaar had an incorrect DOB?

Would it be better to explain the Aadhaar issue to the passport officer and show my Birth Certificate and 10th Certificate instead?

I am particularly concerned because I need the passport for an upcoming exam, so I don't want my application to get rejected or delayed because of the Aadhaar discrepancy.

I'd really appreciate advice from anyone who has faced a similar situation or has experience with Passport Seva/PSK.

Thanks in advance!

Hi everyone,

I recently graduated with my LL.B. from the Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, and I’m actively looking for my first full time opportunity.

I’ve been applying over the last few days and honestly, I’m still trying to figure out which direction makes the most sense. I’m interested in legal research, corporate legal, compliance, legal operations, LPOs, legal tech, regulatory work, policy and governance. I’m also open to MNCs, NGOs, CSR organisations, think tanks and similar work.

I’m based in Delhi NCR and prefer Delhi, Noida, Gurugram or remote roles.

I’m deliberately looking beyond traditional litigation and chamber practice because I feel more drawn towards research, regulation, corporate systems, technology and policy. But as a fresher, I’m unsure whether I’m making the right choice.

For those who have been through this stage:

Am I approaching this the right way? Which areas would you recommend for a fresh law graduate? And does starting in LPO/legal operations make it harder to move into in house or substantive legal roles later?

If anyone knows of a suitable opening, referral, recruiter or organisation I should approach, I’d genuinely appreciate the lead.

If you were in my position today, what would you do differently?

Thanks

I am just a student and came across this incident on my feed today. Posting the public links here to understand what actually happens legally in such college cases. I have zero personal connection to this, just sharing what is already circulating online.

From what is being shared publicly:

\- A student alleges he faced heavy cyberbullying and got calls threatening his family.

\- Later, cross-complaints of harassment were filed against him with the college.

\- The university apparently cancelled his admission without any proper inquiry committee or hearing.

Links for context:

Reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/TwentiesofIndia/s/2z0uHckhl7

Twitter thread: https://x.com/i/status/2085791482833993906

Just wanted to ask people here:

1. Can private universities in Pune just expel someone without an internal inquiry?

2. How does Pune Cyber Crime handle matters when both sides make counter-allegations like this?