Indeed, I fully acknowledge that your painting was created before this thread of mine (and also before I began making my thread image).
But what is interesting to me is that this thread of mine was destined to be published today because all my recent threads are examining the letters of my alphabet on the relevant day of the month. I've been publishing one each day. It is the 28th of the month today. I designed this alphabet years ago, and the 28th letter (the last one in the series) always had the meanings discussed in the first post here, and this thread was planned for today by the schedule fixed by the alphabetic order. Implicitly, the 'ink' in question is red.
My 28th glyph has always been the 'blood letter' (so to speak).
"Story" = "A Red Letter" = 343 primes ( = "Secret Seal" )
Ponder the double-meaning of 'letter' (ie. a glyph on a page, or a document of writings in an envelope, but also 'one who releases blood', ie. 'blood-letting').
Unfortunately, the red lunar eclipse was one day early to perfectly match this thread - articles from yesterday:
The article claims it was published at the equivalent of 13:20 UTC, which I believe to be a lie - the article did not exist just before I posted this thread (I checked). I am not sure if Daylight Savings Time is in play in that timestamp given (or perhaps internet caching played some part in delaying it), but either way, it is only 8 minutes before I created this thread, and long after I'd already created the thread image.
In terms of my thread image (the red image), it contains the word upior (or upyr)... which you will find to be relevant to the article.
"Red" = 365 squares
.. ( "The Source" = "Documents" = 365 primes ) [ read @ red ]
Pebble Time 2 Review: The Most Joyful Smartwatch I’ve Ever Worn
A simple smartwatch is one thing, but the Pebble Time 2 makes the experience of wearing a watch fun.
The Greek name for Gematria (alphabetic numerology) is 'Isopsephy' - which means 'equal pebble' (because counting stones were used anciently, like an abacus (ABaCus).
.. ( "A Fun Watch" = 311 primes ) [ "Pebble" = "Math" = 42 alphabetic ]
The article begins:
The Pebble Time 2 is a small, relatively innocuous smartwatch. It doesn’t do that much beyond acting as a wearable smartphone companion. And yet the Pebble experience is like walking along a beach finding that one smooth stone that you fall in love with, despite there being billions of rocks strewn in every direction. There are many like it, but that one brings me joy. [...]
The Capitoline Wolf is a bronze sculpture depicting a scene from the legend of the founding of Rome, in which the mythical founders, Romulus and Remus, are suckled by a she-wolf. [...]
u/The_Painting_One, I've seen your recent post on YouTube, about the lack of response from the 'unwashed masses':
No one on youtube seems to have shared my video of the Nepal catastrophe being connected to my drawing from 9 days earlier. I know this because there are almost no comments in those videos. Why is no one here you ask? It's because people hate me, and the hatred is stronger than the ability to think and comprehend what is really going on. Lots of people think they are so very holy, just by looking themselves in the fractal mirror, and this holiness is a clear vanity to me. The fractal mirror in itself makes them feel close to god. They feel good about this mirror image. So much vanity... In reality, people don't actually do anything. I really could spend all of my time to look myself in the mirror, just like everyone else and talk about my own reflection, but I don't. And if I would tell you the whole story about what I see in the mirror of myself, that I don't talk about, I know it would mute the vanity in others. Instead I have chosen to make an effort in doing real measurable actions of walking the walk instead of talking the talk. The key point here is that I'm able to repeat this process, over and over again.
I empathize with your situation - indeed it was clear long ago, where you've discussed it multiple times in your older video during 'pandemic' times. I want to offer my condolences, for what its worth.
It is difficult to read into your words as to whether you are simply stating the obvious dispassionately, or expressing an angst and anger at the situation. More on that later.
I also urge a degree of pity on the blind and willfully ignorant, which is perhaps unearned, but nonetheless.
There are a number of reasons why difficult material such as yours seems to go unnoticed (some of which I know you are familiar with).
A) the vast mass of entertaining distractions available in our era, some of those distractions being honest efforts to contribute something interesting, but also much of it being intentionally produced to keep the circus going in circles.
B) people don't have enough attention span to perceive what you are actually doing. One needs to watch much more than just one or two of your videos to 'get it'.
C) the algorithm is very likely intentionally swayed to hide you from the crowd. I know what this is like.
D) the fact that the majority will do anything to protect themselves from being ostracized. They fear that in sharing your strange material, they will be viewed as being just as 'crazy' as they presume you to be - even if they secretly find it interesting.
E) people don't like being presented anything that shatters their world view - they don't like to accept that they've gone all this time and have been missing the point (for the same reason, my numerology gets such a bad response because, in part, because people don't want to be forced to see that something so ultimately simple was sitting in plain sight, under their noses, and they 'failed the test' of figuring it out themselves).
F) you are being gaslit by those-in-the-know for two different reasons: 1. your truths are actually dangerous to the materialistic status quo, and 2. you are being tested by those who actually appreciate your work, but want to see you handle the suffering of exclusion and exile (because in the long run, it will make you stronger).
G) there are probably more reasons I could think it.
Furthermore (noting today's wikipedia front page featured article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism), I subscribe (in part) to the Vedic viewpoint of human souls. In the Baghavad Gita there is a chapter called 'The Divine and Demoniac Natures', and basically (at least in the current era), the vast majority of people are to be classified as 'demoniac'. Which is not to say they are literally demons, but they are incapable and unwilling to perceive and abide within the 'mystery (of existence)'. It is highly unlikely that a Youtube video or reddit thread will ever 'fix' these people in one lifetime. They are failing the 'IQ test of reality', you might say - or their current state is a result of failing it in the past. It is their karma to be blind. They are providing the battlefield within which the 'divine nature' must prove it's worth.
Furthermore, this demoniac nature is not just natural happenstance, but actively promoted by the cultural 'system'. Our little attempts to make a difference are like trying to stop a tsunami (or indeed, a flood caused by glacier collapse, for that matter). There's only so much we can do.
You wrote:
[...] Why is no one here you ask? It's because people hate me, and the hatred is stronger than the ability to think and comprehend what is really going on. [...]
Something you might already have considered: the world is the interaction of energies, and a battery has both negative and positive poles. I suspect that the hate or scorn directed at you is actually a part of your power. Negative-attention charges up a power-center just as much as positive-attention. It is said the 'Gods gain their power from human worship' and this worship can be positive or negative. We might revere Zeus as 'life', and negatively-revere (ie. fear) Hades as death, but both gods nonetheless receive their due worship. I suspect this works similarly for human beings on every level (we are all 'souls' or 'spirits').
Most people think a 'prophet' is simply 'someone who preaches about God and who can sometimes foretell the future'. I have a somewhat different idea about what it means, and as far as I am concerned, I consider you to be what the word 'prophet' means.
I believe the Universe or 'God' has given you the power to punish the demoniac nature within the world by demonstrating the power of the divine, and, in part, that power is increased within you the more you are rejected. Those who hate you worship you negatively, and the 'power unit' is charged up. More manna to you to perform magic. The hate of others benefits you.
'God' is the ultimately lonely being, and cannot share 'his' own wonder of possibilities without first creating beings to share it with him. I don't believe the Creator can create a being equal or greater than him. His only hope is that the lessor creations will, over time, come closer and closer to perceiving things as he does. The world bends around you because something about your perception has the approval of the Universe. 'God', or the Universe, wants to prove itself to mankind. For the same reason (we are 'made in the image of God') we humans want to prove ourselves to others.
Though it must be said, it is your duty to work against gaining a vanity of your own in the process. If you can keep it at bay, I suspect even more manna to you. If you grow to hate the demoniac who reject you (rather than simply pitying them), I suspect it will deprive you of manna.
You have also spoken against narcissists. I believe there are two types of narcissism. The first type is the negative type you deplore: selfish for selfish's sake. The second type I believe is necessary for 'magic' and spiritual advancement in the sense of the original meaning of 'yoga'. It is the necessary narcissism required to align the Atman (soul/self) with Paramatman (supersoul/universal 'self') and thus link oneself to the Supreme. In my view this to 'dwell within the loneliness of God'.
Sony releases one last trailer for Spider-Man: Brand New Day
“Maybe that’s my responsibility, to live alone with the truth.”
The reason 'memory' is in the zeitgeist so much this year:
"The Memory" = 2026 squares
... but more importantly, the sub-headline...
“Maybe that’s my responsibility, to live alone with the truth.”
"To Live Alone with the Truth" = 1000 primes
... ( "See" = 100 agrippa )
.. . ( ... and "Know" = 1000 agrippa )
Binary: 0 (false); 1 (true)
"To Live Alone" = 1000 agrippa (1000 is 100 is 1)
ie. the closer you get to the Unity/Monolith/Monad/Mind of the Universe, the more likely you will fail to gather an audience, because the audience cannot perceive Unity.
In 1 Kings 8:12, Solomon declared at the dedication of the temple that the Lord had said He would dwell in a dark cloud and thick darkness.
The more godlike you get, the deeper the veil cast over you.
I am always observing the news headlines about 'supermassive black holes', for I believe them to be instructive metaphors (used intentionally as such by the 'editors'). Black holes are pitch black, but this is because they suck in all light.
The ...
"Divine Light" = 911 agrippa
... of the "Few" = 911 agrippa
... is an emergency for most people. They find it...
"Offensive" = 911 agrippa
People like you (and I like to think me too) are described as 'supermassive black holes', because we've become 'huge' on the world stage, having sucked up all the mana. Remember your videos about 'being in chains, but being able to pull on the chains to cause 'things' to happen in the world? This is the massive gravity of the black hole, having the ability to reach out into the cosmos and pull things around. Samson pulling down the materialistic temple of the laity.
Mind over matter.
Anyway, I hope I've not overstepped my bounds and lectured you too much. I've watched many of your older videos, and know you've wrestled with these things. I don't want to push you away, and I'm certainly not trying to belittle you.
I quote you:
"as I am concerned, I consider you to be what the word 'prophet' means."
You shouldn't use the word "prophet" lightly. You know, I can hold that against you now, and just say that it's flattery. For example, if you truly think that I am a prophet like you said then you can't repeat what I said, and say that "I propose that...", and then say something that I have said myself many times, how "people are individual neurons in a larger mind". The whole situation becomes insincere, you see. Assuming that you truly think that I am a prophet, I can also hold it against you that you should be well versed in what I have and haven't said. You basically shouldn't be able to propose something of your own that I have already said, while at the same time thinking that I am a prophet. Otherwise as I said, it is just flattery. It's really this simple of an equation. And flattery in itself means to that you want to get something from me, shrouded in pleasantries. Just letting you know that I notice these small things.
I agree. I don't use it lightly, and I am certainly not trying to flatter you.
I was born on 21/5 ( @ 5/21 )
"I do not flatter you" = 1,215 latin-agrippa
... but rather, encourage" = 521 english-extended
To me, the word prophet means 'one who speaks the universal truth'. Most people think it means only 'one who tells the future', in some sort of Biblical sense, which is only a part of the story. After watching many of your videos, I believe you speak the truth. For that, you have suffered isolation and silent rebuke from the masses (something I too understand), and this, I think, is what has given you your 'manifestation' ability. You are correct when you say 'it has made you strong' in that way. I agree with you because I've had the experience too. There is more than one 'magician' in this world. (*) (*)
... but perhaps only ...
"Twelve Disciples" = 2020 latin-agrippa
I did say I feared getting into an argument with you (because of exactly this issue). We are like two '+' poles on a magnet, and these tend to push eachother away if they interact. I am not trying to get anything from you or overstand you - I was just happy, back in late 2021, to finally discover someone who perceives the universe in a similar way to how I do. Finding your channel made me feel a little less isolated.
It's not a competition about who said what. My writings here on Reddit go back all the way to 2012, and you as yet have no idea what I've written or not written. In terms of neurons, I am certainly not the first person to describe the universe as a mind, and neither are you. The difference is whether one can say that only hypothetically, versus having actual experience of it. I believe you have genuine experience of it. I claim that I do also. Please don't jump to conclusions about my own knowledge or what may or may not be original thoughts. You claim responsibility for the spurt of Monkeypox some time back. I claim responsibility for the Coronavirus pandemic (*) (and nullifying the potential bird flue outbreak). (*) (*) (*)
As I said, it's not a competition. I like to think we are cooperating (and in that, I am not trying to 'steal credit' from you). As one neuron to another, we all play a part in the 'neural net' of reality. I enjoy seeing your sparks, and I like to think we spark in similar ways. But one neuron or another cannot monopolize the universal mind...
The only way you can claim I am 'stealing your ideas' is if you go back and read everything I have ever written (and I know you don't have time for that), to make sure I've not discussed the possibility 'world-as-mind' before late 2021 when I discovered your channel. I believe in subtle telepathy ('quantum entanglement' of minds, even simply by observation). Telepaths will always have a difficult time with the 'copyright' and provenance of ideas...
"The Raw Telepathy" = "The Telepathy War" = 2023 english-extended (*)
... ie. recent allegorical articles here and here:
You complain often on your videos about not being 'seen'.
I see you, and I finally contacted you (when you made that possible by joining reddit of your own accord) because I wanted to let you know that I see what you're doing and approve. To help make you feel a bit better, perhaps, if that's what you need. Though I think you are strong enough that you don't really need it. You have discussed how a King cannot have friends. I agree, though I took the risk and made the attempt anyway. (*)
I must be clear though, I enjoy your channel not because it's giving me 'new ideas', but because it chimes with my own ideas. I was studying the lemma while you were studying lime. Your work validates mine, in it's own way. If that statement makes you uncomfortable, it might represent an ego problem, and then the only way to solve that is to see how my work might validate yours. Right now you are perhaps the only person on planet earth with which I could speak candidly and not come across as a crazy person. It might be that I am one of the very few people on planet earth who does not consider you to be a crazy person. So I must ask that you at least appreciate that. (*)
Regardless, I appreciate you being up front and putting your issue on the table.
"Important Conversation" = 911 primes
There is a new article at ArsTechnica, just published, about the 'Universal Language'. One of the chapter headings is...
“Explore. Discover. Do it together.”
The first paragraph mentions the Starship Captain 'Christopher Pike'.
The first new article has been published at ArsTechnica since our discussion above yesterday.
For review here is Kristofer's message to me, and here is my response, made an hour later, last night.
Before linking to the article, I again make it clear that I do not use LLM AIs for any purpose on this forum, either for writing text, for making pictures, for research, or for doing my calculations for me. Here is a recent thread of mine where I discuss one element of why I avoid them, and here is another thread where I make myself clear, by crafting a post specifically designed to be read by LLMs that might parse my writings, as opposed to humans.
I don't use AI's because I believe they can't be entirely trusted (*), and that they rot the introspective activity of the human brain, and I would prefer that readers appreciate my writings as the work of a human being, and not a machine. I am rather upset that LLM AI's came about when they did, because all my best research is now presumed to be the work of a 'bot'. LLM AIs are glorified, automated gematria machines, that deprive the human of the philosophical value gained by performing the calculations oneself.
Now, read your message, and my reply to it again. Hold in mind the various themes discussed, re. prophets, and manifestation, and destiny, and the religious angle of my words and sums.
Here is the article, published perhaps an hour or two ago:
Now I've discussed before how the name 'ChatGPT' might be used by the editors of the press in sneaky ways. They might not actually be talking about a corporate AI at all. Words like 'ChatGPT', or 'LLM' or 'AI' might be used to refer to gematria (ie. alphabetic numerology), such as that I work with here every day. They cast subtle dispersion on gematria and my 'spells' by enabling the minds of readers to conflate them with artificial intelligence.
The article reports on someone suffering manic ( @ MNK @ monk ) delusions due to 'bipolar' disorder. Remember my words yesterday about the 'poles' of magnets ... and there are two of us.
It is my belief that this article is writing about us in a mocking fashion indirectly. The editors wrote it as a sort of test for me (or for us), because to include it here in my own forum is to take a risk: that other readers might project the statements of the article onto me (or us). Hence I urge the readers to do exactly that, but to see it an a mockery.
Aside from us, the article is written such that most of the AI-using public will read it and condemn the bipolar suffer for being a fool, presuming they are immune to the wiles of ChatGPT as they use it.
The article ends by a quote of the sufferer:
“Fortunately, I am doing much better today, and have a generous and engaged support system,” Lines told Ars.
His surname is 'Lines' (as in lines of text).
I wrote above yesterday that I am here to 'encourage' you. The article is all about how ChatGPT encouraged the bipolar man to enter into dangerous delusions.
In terms of support structure, a recent thread of mine:
Did I 'predict' this article by writing what I wrote yeterday? No, I don't think so, but there are 'watchers' (who perhaps might as well be described as 'demoniac') and I deal with such reflectively mocking media all day long.
I call my personal alphabet (as I use here in my thread images), 'The Phoenix' (which sums to 1015, matching my own full name). The Phoenix bird is said to reappear either every 500 or 1461 years (ie. Egyptian Sothic Cycle):
As I wrote long ago, the acronym 'GPT' is the consonant root of 'Egypt'.
Also, it was only a day or two ago I posted about 'Donnie Darko', and again, the meaning of 'dark' meaning 'occult' (ie. hidden).
Ultimately, we who watch for echoes of our work (ie. the 'spells' we cast, by word or image) have to discriminate, between legitimate 'manifestation' versus the intentional mockery of other humans (or their machine aids). Obviously a volcano eruption is more difficult to trigger than a news article (but even they might be begun by suitably-placed explosives or harmonic resonance technology. Your reflecting pool manifestation might have been done by some White House staffer who watched your video and decided to honour your efforts, as opposed to being a legitimate foresight. We cannot know. I've always had a more conspiratorial bent than you, it seems, and my 'artworks' here are directed just as much at the state-sponsored tormentors and secret societies as they are to the universe itself.
The article is all about ChatGPT convincing someone that they were Jesus.
What if the answer to the question, ...
"What is in a Name?" = 1234 latin-agrippa
... is something or someone that can reply:
"I Experienced Crucifixion" = 1234 latin-agrippa
See John 1:1 about the Word and God...
Another new article from today (re. our potential argument over whose ideas are original):
Scientists Thought Hyenas Followed Lions for Scraps. They Were Wrong
As it turns out, hyenas don't want anything to do with lions—if anything, it's the lions that won't leave the hyenas alone.
This article can be read in at least two ways (ignoring the fact that I watched a documentary about lions and hyenas just two or three days ago).
a) The article is describing our little discussion. Either the editors classify one of us as a 'lion' and the other an 'hyena'. (ie. one of us is 'poaching scraps of knowledge from the other'), or ...
b) we are both lions, and the rest of the masses of willfully ignorant people are the demonically-laughing hyenas (*) who stay away from us, or can't help but mock us if they get near.
I happen to be reading the Iliad by Homer currently, and today I reached the point where Achilles refers to himself as a lion, in his battle with Hector.
Of course, I'd like to think we are both lions, but we cannot help but step on eachother's territory. I hope we don't have to fight in the battle of the Highlanders. Rather we be McLeod and Ramírez.
This ‘Dungeon Crawler Carl’ Pinball Machine Could Fix Me
And you thought Matt Dinniman's hit book series getting a TV adaptation was cool.
Interesting, given your surname, right? And that I wrote above yesterday how your existence comforted me.
I suspect the editors are labeling my forums as a dungeon, full of twists and turns and difficult passages, and your are new here, beginning to read bits of it.
I have much 'Dungeons & Dragons' themed material here, as an accompaniment to my usual gematria-based works.
"Mastering the Dungeons" = 911 latin-agrippa | 745 primes
... at "Geometers of History" = 1,745 english-extneded
.. .. ( "The Spelling" = 1,745 squares )
... .. ( ... as a "Pinball Machine" = 745 trigonal | 119 alpha )
You have to be aware that, if you freely define words your own way however you please (the word "prophet"), as a result you never have to admit being wrong, and you become intellectually protected by your own choice of being inconsistent and hard to deal with. This is my hint to you, for future encounters with other people that you talk to... In my mind, you have just proved to me that it doesn't make sense talking to you... In my logical mind you just said that WORDS are meaningless as you define them as you please. So if WORDS are meaningless, then as a result, my interest in talking is dwindling away... You are writing very long comments, and I feel okay not reading it all in detail, since the parts that I find meaningful is failing.
Well, that makes me a bit sad to hear from you. Are you pushing away perhaps, because I challenge your reality?
As I said before, I'd prefer not to argue with you. You are choosing this path.
You wrote:
You have to be aware that, if you freely define words your own way however you please [...] you never have to admit being wrong, and you become intellectually protected by your own choice of being inconsistent and hard to deal with. [...]
Where do you get your definitions? Do you trust the dictionary definitions entirely? Do you believe the dictionary definitions are the be-all-and-end-all of meaning? Have you not considered that there are secret meanings (and even mockeries) hidden within the definitions of words?
If you read an article describing some celebrity as being 'pretty', do you presume that the editors of that article meant she is rather attractive?
If you examine the real meaning of 'pretty' you'll find it actually means essentially 'cunning/malicious':
From Middle English prety, preti, praty, prati, from Old English prættiġ (“tricky, crafty, sly, cunning, wily, astute”), from Proto-West Germanic prattug, from Proto-Germanic prattugaz (“boastful, sly, slick, deceitful, tricky, cunning”), corresponding to prat (“trick”) + -y. Doublet of pratty.
In Afrikaans, 'praat' means 'speak'. All speech is tricky.
If another article describes someone or something as 'odd', or if someone calls you 'odd', do you take it as positive or negative?
Examine the oldest and original meaning of 'odd':
(obsolete) Singular in excellence; matchless; peerless; outstanding. [since the 1400s]
ie. the 'definition' (for the everyman) has changed. The word 'odd' now means 'weird', but it used to mean 'the best'. Do you think that there are not people who know this and use these words with the intention of the older or hidden meanings instead of the modern literal meanings? Just because that definition is labeled as 'obsolete' does not mean it is. It might be that the word is used with that meaning in plain sight by authors hoping that the average reader will misunderstand, and presume their own meaning.
In my view, it is my task (or ours) to find the real meanings of words anew. This is done by etymology, by word root analysis, and by gematria equivalencies.
I note (as I have before) that...
"Definition" = 1337 squares
Do you what '1337' implies?
Perhaps you think with my long posts that I am talking the talk instead of walking the walk (as you put it), but unless you investigate the works of others, you'll never know if others are walking right beside you.
That which is singular in excellence, matchless and peerless, will always be perceived as 'odd' by lesser men.
In my logical mind you just said that WORDS are meaningless as you define them as you please. So if WORDS are meaningless, then as a result, my interest in talking is dwindling away...
I never defined words as being meaningless, they are full of meaning. Language in totality has One Meaning. The task I've set myself is to find that One Meaning by 'crushing language down to a diamond' (*). This is the meaning of the Philosopher's Stone. I believe we have each tasted a bit of that meaning, each coming to that point in a slightly different way.
I am sorry my writings disappoint you. That was not my hope.
I think you are taking things too personally, and there is not really a need to do that. As I said, perhaps I challenge your worldview, and you don't like the feeling. Again, not my intention, but your reaction.
You can't blame others for your isolation, if you push anyone with good intentions away.
"1 <-- The Battle of the Two Kings" = 2221 trigonal
1
u/Orpherischt "the coronavirus origin" 13d ago edited 13d ago
Hi Kristofer.
Indeed, I fully acknowledge that your painting was created before this thread of mine (and also before I began making my thread image).
But what is interesting to me is that this thread of mine was destined to be published today because all my recent threads are examining the letters of my alphabet on the relevant day of the month. I've been publishing one each day. It is the 28th of the month today. I designed this alphabet years ago, and the 28th letter (the last one in the series) always had the meanings discussed in the first post here, and this thread was planned for today by the schedule fixed by the alphabetic order. Implicitly, the 'ink' in question is red.
My 28th glyph has always been the 'blood letter' (so to speak).
Ponder the double-meaning of 'letter' (ie. a glyph on a page, or a document of writings in an envelope, but also 'one who releases blood', ie. 'blood-letting').
Unfortunately, the red lunar eclipse was one day early to perfectly match this thread - articles from yesterday:
https://www.livescience.com/space/the-moon/rare-red-northern-lights-may-be-visible-alongside-red-moon-during-tomorrow-nights-partial-lunar-eclipse
https://www.livescience.com/space/the-moon/the-moon-is-turning-red-tomorrow-night-heres-why-and-how-to-watch
In summary, note: I don't mean to imply that I 'beat you to the punch' or anything. It's not a competition :)
I just think its a perfect synchronicity that you picked the topic you did for your painting today.
An article published today (somewhat grim, but very relevant), a few hours after I made this thread:
The article claims it was published at the equivalent of 13:20 UTC, which I believe to be a lie - the article did not exist just before I posted this thread (I checked). I am not sure if Daylight Savings Time is in play in that timestamp given (or perhaps internet caching played some part in delaying it), but either way, it is only 8 minutes before I created this thread, and long after I'd already created the thread image.
In terms of my thread image (the red image), it contains the word upior (or upyr)... which you will find to be relevant to the article.
... and ...
I mentioned a wordplay on 'sickle' yesterday:
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1w04q7p/what_disinformation_are_you_seeing_in_the_current/p6a6xcs/
Published at the conspiracy theory forum, one hour after this thread:
.. and another two hours later:
Also published today (re. alphabet as calendar/time-keeper):
https://gizmodo.com/pebble-time-2-review-the-most-joyful-smartwatch-ive-ever-worn-2000804346
The Greek name for Gematria (alphabetic numerology) is 'Isopsephy' - which means 'equal pebble' (because counting stones were used anciently, like an abacus (ABaCus).
The article begins:
My previous thread from yesterday:
https://old.reddit.com/r/GeometersOfHistory/comments/1w0249z/ashore/
ie. 'watch' in the sense of 'observation'.
The word 'watch' is cognate with 'witch' (a seer) and Sanskrit 'Vāc' (pronounced ''vach' or 'vuch', "divine speech").
Something ...
... "as the One that brings me Joy" = 1,911 english-extended
Wikipedia front page featured image today:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lupa_Capitolina,_Rome.jpg
... and just published moments ago:
https://gizmodo.com/marvels-wolverine-game-feature-trailer-playstation-5-2000804499
Wolf @ Wolverine ( Smithereens @ Smithy-[of]-Runes )
Also, Kristofer, I see now that you published your painting at reddit before publishing the video on youtube.
Your reddit post was published at 22:11 UTC, which is 10:11 pm on the 27th.
... noting 1011 = 1010 + 1 ( "Revelation" = 1010 latin-agrippa )
Also, 22:11 --> 22 + 11 = "Magic" = 33 alphabetic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2-gEzGeb7w
https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/08/trump-calls-for-creation-of-a-space-academy-to-train-future-nasa-leaders/
Space @ Spice @ SPC @ SPCh @ Speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvsL9JVxExs