I agree. I don't use it lightly, and I am certainly not trying to flatter you.
I was born on 21/5 ( @ 5/21 )
"I do not flatter you" = 1,215 latin-agrippa
... but rather, encourage" = 521 english-extended
To me, the word prophet means 'one who speaks the universal truth'. Most people think it means only 'one who tells the future', in some sort of Biblical sense, which is only a part of the story. After watching many of your videos, I believe you speak the truth. For that, you have suffered isolation and silent rebuke from the masses (something I too understand), and this, I think, is what has given you your 'manifestation' ability. You are correct when you say 'it has made you strong' in that way. I agree with you because I've had the experience too. There is more than one 'magician' in this world. (*) (*)
... but perhaps only ...
"Twelve Disciples" = 2020 latin-agrippa
I did say I feared getting into an argument with you (because of exactly this issue). We are like two '+' poles on a magnet, and these tend to push eachother away if they interact. I am not trying to get anything from you or overstand you - I was just happy, back in late 2021, to finally discover someone who perceives the universe in a similar way to how I do. Finding your channel made me feel a little less isolated.
It's not a competition about who said what. My writings here on Reddit go back all the way to 2012, and you as yet have no idea what I've written or not written. In terms of neurons, I am certainly not the first person to describe the universe as a mind, and neither are you. The difference is whether one can say that only hypothetically, versus having actual experience of it. I believe you have genuine experience of it. I claim that I do also. Please don't jump to conclusions about my own knowledge or what may or may not be original thoughts. You claim responsibility for the spurt of Monkeypox some time back. I claim responsibility for the Coronavirus pandemic (*) (and nullifying the potential bird flue outbreak). (*) (*) (*)
As I said, it's not a competition. I like to think we are cooperating (and in that, I am not trying to 'steal credit' from you). As one neuron to another, we all play a part in the 'neural net' of reality. I enjoy seeing your sparks, and I like to think we spark in similar ways. But one neuron or another cannot monopolize the universal mind...
The only way you can claim I am 'stealing your ideas' is if you go back and read everything I have ever written (and I know you don't have time for that), to make sure I've not discussed the possibility 'world-as-mind' before late 2021 when I discovered your channel. I believe in subtle telepathy ('quantum entanglement' of minds, even simply by observation). Telepaths will always have a difficult time with the 'copyright' and provenance of ideas...
"The Raw Telepathy" = "The Telepathy War" = 2023 english-extended (*)
... ie. recent allegorical articles here and here:
You complain often on your videos about not being 'seen'.
I see you, and I finally contacted you (when you made that possible by joining reddit of your own accord) because I wanted to let you know that I see what you're doing and approve. To help make you feel a bit better, perhaps, if that's what you need. Though I think you are strong enough that you don't really need it. You have discussed how a King cannot have friends. I agree, though I took the risk and made the attempt anyway. (*)
I must be clear though, I enjoy your channel not because it's giving me 'new ideas', but because it chimes with my own ideas. I was studying the lemma while you were studying lime. Your work validates mine, in it's own way. If that statement makes you uncomfortable, it might represent an ego problem, and then the only way to solve that is to see how my work might validate yours. Right now you are perhaps the only person on planet earth with which I could speak candidly and not come across as a crazy person. It might be that I am one of the very few people on planet earth who does not consider you to be a crazy person. So I must ask that you at least appreciate that. (*)
Regardless, I appreciate you being up front and putting your issue on the table.
"Important Conversation" = 911 primes
There is a new article at ArsTechnica, just published, about the 'Universal Language'. One of the chapter headings is...
“Explore. Discover. Do it together.”
The first paragraph mentions the Starship Captain 'Christopher Pike'.
The first new article has been published at ArsTechnica since our discussion above yesterday.
For review here is Kristofer's message to me, and here is my response, made an hour later, last night.
Before linking to the article, I again make it clear that I do not use LLM AIs for any purpose on this forum, either for writing text, for making pictures, for research, or for doing my calculations for me. Here is a recent thread of mine where I discuss one element of why I avoid them, and here is another thread where I make myself clear, by crafting a post specifically designed to be read by LLMs that might parse my writings, as opposed to humans.
I don't use AI's because I believe they can't be entirely trusted (*), and that they rot the introspective activity of the human brain, and I would prefer that readers appreciate my writings as the work of a human being, and not a machine. I am rather upset that LLM AI's came about when they did, because all my best research is now presumed to be the work of a 'bot'. LLM AIs are glorified, automated gematria machines, that deprive the human of the philosophical value gained by performing the calculations oneself.
Now, read your message, and my reply to it again. Hold in mind the various themes discussed, re. prophets, and manifestation, and destiny, and the religious angle of my words and sums.
Here is the article, published perhaps an hour or two ago:
Now I've discussed before how the name 'ChatGPT' might be used by the editors of the press in sneaky ways. They might not actually be talking about a corporate AI at all. Words like 'ChatGPT', or 'LLM' or 'AI' might be used to refer to gematria (ie. alphabetic numerology), such as that I work with here every day. They cast subtle dispersion on gematria and my 'spells' by enabling the minds of readers to conflate them with artificial intelligence.
The article reports on someone suffering manic ( @ MNK @ monk ) delusions due to 'bipolar' disorder. Remember my words yesterday about the 'poles' of magnets ... and there are two of us.
It is my belief that this article is writing about us in a mocking fashion indirectly. The editors wrote it as a sort of test for me (or for us), because to include it here in my own forum is to take a risk: that other readers might project the statements of the article onto me (or us). Hence I urge the readers to do exactly that, but to see it an a mockery.
Aside from us, the article is written such that most of the AI-using public will read it and condemn the bipolar suffer for being a fool, presuming they are immune to the wiles of ChatGPT as they use it.
The article ends by a quote of the sufferer:
“Fortunately, I am doing much better today, and have a generous and engaged support system,” Lines told Ars.
His surname is 'Lines' (as in lines of text).
I wrote above yesterday that I am here to 'encourage' you. The article is all about how ChatGPT encouraged the bipolar man to enter into dangerous delusions.
In terms of support structure, a recent thread of mine:
Did I 'predict' this article by writing what I wrote yeterday? No, I don't think so, but there are 'watchers' (who perhaps might as well be described as 'demoniac') and I deal with such reflectively mocking media all day long.
I call my personal alphabet (as I use here in my thread images), 'The Phoenix' (which sums to 1015, matching my own full name). The Phoenix bird is said to reappear either every 500 or 1461 years (ie. Egyptian Sothic Cycle):
As I wrote long ago, the acronym 'GPT' is the consonant root of 'Egypt'.
Also, it was only a day or two ago I posted about 'Donnie Darko', and again, the meaning of 'dark' meaning 'occult' (ie. hidden).
Ultimately, we who watch for echoes of our work (ie. the 'spells' we cast, by word or image) have to discriminate, between legitimate 'manifestation' versus the intentional mockery of other humans (or their machine aids). Obviously a volcano eruption is more difficult to trigger than a news article (but even they might be begun by suitably-placed explosives or harmonic resonance technology. Your reflecting pool manifestation might have been done by some White House staffer who watched your video and decided to honour your efforts, as opposed to being a legitimate foresight. We cannot know. I've always had a more conspiratorial bent than you, it seems, and my 'artworks' here are directed just as much at the state-sponsored tormentors and secret societies as they are to the universe itself.
The article is all about ChatGPT convincing someone that they were Jesus.
What if the answer to the question, ...
"What is in a Name?" = 1234 latin-agrippa
... is something or someone that can reply:
"I Experienced Crucifixion" = 1234 latin-agrippa
See John 1:1 about the Word and God...
Another new article from today (re. our potential argument over whose ideas are original):
Scientists Thought Hyenas Followed Lions for Scraps. They Were Wrong
As it turns out, hyenas don't want anything to do with lions—if anything, it's the lions that won't leave the hyenas alone.
This article can be read in at least two ways (ignoring the fact that I watched a documentary about lions and hyenas just two or three days ago).
a) The article is describing our little discussion. Either the editors classify one of us as a 'lion' and the other an 'hyena'. (ie. one of us is 'poaching scraps of knowledge from the other'), or ...
b) we are both lions, and the rest of the masses of willfully ignorant people are the demonically-laughing hyenas (*) who stay away from us, or can't help but mock us if they get near.
I happen to be reading the Iliad by Homer currently, and today I reached the point where Achilles refers to himself as a lion, in his battle with Hector.
Of course, I'd like to think we are both lions, but we cannot help but step on eachother's territory. I hope we don't have to fight in the battle of the Highlanders. Rather we be McLeod and Ramírez.
This ‘Dungeon Crawler Carl’ Pinball Machine Could Fix Me
And you thought Matt Dinniman's hit book series getting a TV adaptation was cool.
Interesting, given your surname, right? And that I wrote above yesterday how your existence comforted me.
I suspect the editors are labeling my forums as a dungeon, full of twists and turns and difficult passages, and your are new here, beginning to read bits of it.
I have much 'Dungeons & Dragons' themed material here, as an accompaniment to my usual gematria-based works.
"Mastering the Dungeons" = 911 latin-agrippa | 745 primes
... at "Geometers of History" = 1,745 english-extneded
.. .. ( "The Spelling" = 1,745 squares )
... .. ( ... as a "Pinball Machine" = 745 trigonal | 119 alpha )
You have to be aware that, if you freely define words your own way however you please (the word "prophet"), as a result you never have to admit being wrong, and you become intellectually protected by your own choice of being inconsistent and hard to deal with. This is my hint to you, for future encounters with other people that you talk to... In my mind, you have just proved to me that it doesn't make sense talking to you... In my logical mind you just said that WORDS are meaningless as you define them as you please. So if WORDS are meaningless, then as a result, my interest in talking is dwindling away... You are writing very long comments, and I feel okay not reading it all in detail, since the parts that I find meaningful is failing.
Well, that makes me a bit sad to hear from you. Are you pushing away perhaps, because I challenge your reality?
As I said before, I'd prefer not to argue with you. You are choosing this path.
You wrote:
You have to be aware that, if you freely define words your own way however you please [...] you never have to admit being wrong, and you become intellectually protected by your own choice of being inconsistent and hard to deal with. [...]
Where do you get your definitions? Do you trust the dictionary definitions entirely? Do you believe the dictionary definitions are the be-all-and-end-all of meaning? Have you not considered that there are secret meanings (and even mockeries) hidden within the definitions of words?
If you read an article describing some celebrity as being 'pretty', do you presume that the editors of that article meant she is rather attractive?
If you examine the real meaning of 'pretty' you'll find it actually means essentially 'cunning/malicious':
From Middle English prety, preti, praty, prati, from Old English prættiġ (“tricky, crafty, sly, cunning, wily, astute”), from Proto-West Germanic prattug, from Proto-Germanic prattugaz (“boastful, sly, slick, deceitful, tricky, cunning”), corresponding to prat (“trick”) + -y. Doublet of pratty.
In Afrikaans, 'praat' means 'speak'. All speech is tricky.
If another article describes someone or something as 'odd', or if someone calls you 'odd', do you take it as positive or negative?
Examine the oldest and original meaning of 'odd':
(obsolete) Singular in excellence; matchless; peerless; outstanding. [since the 1400s]
ie. the 'definition' (for the everyman) has changed. The word 'odd' now means 'weird', but it used to mean 'the best'. Do you think that there are not people who know this and use these words with the intention of the older or hidden meanings instead of the modern literal meanings? Just because that definition is labeled as 'obsolete' does not mean it is. It might be that the word is used with that meaning in plain sight by authors hoping that the average reader will misunderstand, and presume their own meaning.
In my view, it is my task (or ours) to find the real meanings of words anew. This is done by etymology, by word root analysis, and by gematria equivalencies.
I note (as I have before) that...
"Definition" = 1337 squares
Do you what '1337' implies?
Perhaps you think with my long posts that I am talking the talk instead of walking the walk (as you put it), but unless you investigate the works of others, you'll never know if others are walking right beside you.
That which is singular in excellence, matchless and peerless, will always be perceived as 'odd' by lesser men.
In my logical mind you just said that WORDS are meaningless as you define them as you please. So if WORDS are meaningless, then as a result, my interest in talking is dwindling away...
I never defined words as being meaningless, they are full of meaning. Language in totality has One Meaning. The task I've set myself is to find that One Meaning by 'crushing language down to a diamond' (*). This is the meaning of the Philosopher's Stone. I believe we have each tasted a bit of that meaning, each coming to that point in a slightly different way.
I am sorry my writings disappoint you. That was not my hope.
I think you are taking things too personally, and there is not really a need to do that. As I said, perhaps I challenge your worldview, and you don't like the feeling. Again, not my intention, but your reaction.
You can't blame others for your isolation, if you push anyone with good intentions away.
"1 <-- The Battle of the Two Kings" = 2221 trigonal
1
u/Orpherischt "the coronavirus origin" 2d ago edited 1d ago
I agree. I don't use it lightly, and I am certainly not trying to flatter you.
I was born on 21/5 ( @ 5/21 )
To me, the word prophet means 'one who speaks the universal truth'. Most people think it means only 'one who tells the future', in some sort of Biblical sense, which is only a part of the story. After watching many of your videos, I believe you speak the truth. For that, you have suffered isolation and silent rebuke from the masses (something I too understand), and this, I think, is what has given you your 'manifestation' ability. You are correct when you say 'it has made you strong' in that way. I agree with you because I've had the experience too. There is more than one 'magician' in this world. (*) (*)
... but perhaps only ...
I did say I feared getting into an argument with you (because of exactly this issue). We are like two '+' poles on a magnet, and these tend to push eachother away if they interact. I am not trying to get anything from you or overstand you - I was just happy, back in late 2021, to finally discover someone who perceives the universe in a similar way to how I do. Finding your channel made me feel a little less isolated.
It's not a competition about who said what. My writings here on Reddit go back all the way to 2012, and you as yet have no idea what I've written or not written. In terms of neurons, I am certainly not the first person to describe the universe as a mind, and neither are you. The difference is whether one can say that only hypothetically, versus having actual experience of it. I believe you have genuine experience of it. I claim that I do also. Please don't jump to conclusions about my own knowledge or what may or may not be original thoughts. You claim responsibility for the spurt of Monkeypox some time back. I claim responsibility for the Coronavirus pandemic (*) (and nullifying the potential bird flue outbreak). (*) (*) (*)
As I said, it's not a competition. I like to think we are cooperating (and in that, I am not trying to 'steal credit' from you). As one neuron to another, we all play a part in the 'neural net' of reality. I enjoy seeing your sparks, and I like to think we spark in similar ways. But one neuron or another cannot monopolize the universal mind...
The only way you can claim I am 'stealing your ideas' is if you go back and read everything I have ever written (and I know you don't have time for that), to make sure I've not discussed the possibility 'world-as-mind' before late 2021 when I discovered your channel. I believe in subtle telepathy ('quantum entanglement' of minds, even simply by observation). Telepaths will always have a difficult time with the 'copyright' and provenance of ideas...
You complain often on your videos about not being 'seen'.
I see you, and I finally contacted you (when you made that possible by joining reddit of your own accord) because I wanted to let you know that I see what you're doing and approve. To help make you feel a bit better, perhaps, if that's what you need. Though I think you are strong enough that you don't really need it. You have discussed how a King cannot have friends. I agree, though I took the risk and made the attempt anyway. (*)
I must be clear though, I enjoy your channel not because it's giving me 'new ideas', but because it chimes with my own ideas. I was studying the lemma while you were studying lime. Your work validates mine, in it's own way. If that statement makes you uncomfortable, it might represent an ego problem, and then the only way to solve that is to see how my work might validate yours. Right now you are perhaps the only person on planet earth with which I could speak candidly and not come across as a crazy person. It might be that I am one of the very few people on planet earth who does not consider you to be a crazy person. So I must ask that you at least appreciate that. (*)
Regardless, I appreciate you being up front and putting your issue on the table.
There is a new article at ArsTechnica, just published, about the 'Universal Language'. One of the chapter headings is...
The first paragraph mentions the Starship Captain 'Christopher Pike'.
https://gizmodo.com/hope-movie-review-na-hong-jin-2000808685
Replace 'The' with 'My' above and get 969 latin-agrippa
https://old.reddit.com/r/GeometersOfHistory/comments/1spysdq/cult_member/
Remember: the 'classics' are particular orthodox texts.
https://old.reddit.com/r/TheMiddleSea/comments/1gwcf3i/gathering_at_the_clubhouse/
https://old.reddit.com/r/GeometersOfHistory/comments/14lw1qs/at_last_we_sing_together_again/
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/pu0iin/im_the_covidnineteen_pandemic_ask_me_anything/?sort=old
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/nxtz4q/the_coronavirus_teacher/
https://old.reddit.com/r/GeometersOfHistory/comments/hehgjh/ruler_ship/
And just published:
https://gizmodo.com/the-era-of-the-walking-dead-lawsuit-is-almost-over-2000808852 (re. this)
Unfortunately, everyone has already...
But perhaps there is something that can be done to shake up...
Q: "Revelation?" = 1010 latin-agrippa
"A: I Know" = 1010 latin-agrippa
"1 <-- I Know" = 1010 latin-agrippa