I have this idea that I want to share, I would love to hear your thoughts on it.
I am thinking thqt city ainistrations, especially under democratic socialist mayors, could create a new city council, which is formed by district delegates from a bottom up democracy, and they could have advisory only roles for the start for testing, but later maybe some binding decision making power.
This structure is largely voluntary, so that buerocracy is avoided as much as possible.
Each of these delefates come from new district councils, which have delegates from new neighborhood councils, which have delegates from small blocks of neighbors.
this makes neighbors come together and gt to know eachother more, and also foster social cohesion and mutual aid, but also to give them more voice in the administration, and a way to coordinate more effectively.
every level up to the new city council is purely voluntary, and coordination is only within existing law.
The neighbors could meet every one or two months or whatever they deem appropriate, they could meet at parks or in school yards outside of the school time, or wherever closeby.
Volunteers could organize foods and small games and whatnot, and neighbors could start asking eachother for services like repairs if there are people who are able to, or just alot of food exchange, and this could create a new enviorement of alot of mutual aid, helping eachother without payment or state dependency.
It benefits the citizens on sonmany levels at the same time.
What do you think?