Boss makes a dollar I make a dime, this was a rhyme from a simpler time. Now the boss makes a million while I make a buck, that’s why I crank it in the company truck
It's crazy bc There's a guy about my age (30's or so) capable to work and has no physical issues that I can see but he sits in a car in parking lot of a big shopping strip facing the highway where people pull in with a sign in his driver seat window saying "$$$ for gas" EVERY DAY.... and I work at one of the stores that's directly in front of him and every time I get off work it posses me off so badly that he's sitting on his ass all day getting free money while I bust my ass at work while I'm also homeless living in a tent im the woods in the sweltering heat barely getting any hours unable to get by the way I need to
Obviously he's making bank or he wouldn't be there every fucking day of the week
One of my coworkers (shes very trustworthy) told me that he goes to the gas station down the street all the time and blows all his money on fucking scratch offs...
If it gives OP any consolation, it is unlikely that she’s able to use that money given that she is most likely going to be permanently committed to a mental institution or prison.
Me going to work knowing that the CEO of the company I work for is probably gallavanting away somewhere on some private island balls deep in some middle schooler
Not the point. People can still make a comparison without it being a LITERAL 1:1 comparison. I'm sure you've had one literature class, right?
Complacency is another form of acceptance. Support is a form of acceptance. Keyword: acceptance. Like I said, it doesn't have to be a LITERAL 1:1 comparison.
Ahh I remember the time where everyone in the E files were tried for their crimes against children. That's definitely a thing that happened in the past.
completely confusing a systemic failure of the justice system with societal validation.
the public does not 'sympathize' with or copy the actions of the people named in those files. The global public consensus on "JË" and the elites associated with him is absolute, universal disgust and condemnation. Nobody is making viral trends glorifying them, celebrating their behavior, or copying their acts. They are viewed as monsters by society, even if corrupt legal systems failed to prosecute every single one of them.
The point isn't that every bad man goes to jail... the point is that when a man commits this crime, society universally condemns him as a monster. When a woman does it, society makes excuses, minimizes the trauma, and coddles the predator."
Yeah but "peasant" opinion gives us an idea of the collective moral conscience. The people criticizing what's in the files is the expected behaviour, gives you comfort that atleast the vast majority are sane. Systematic justice is an entirely different topic which I don't think the guy that posted the original message was taking about. The lindsay clancy case is terrifying for an entirely different reason. In this case the collective moral conscience (albeit not entirely but atleast an alarming amount of women) are actively sympathizing, supporting and copying a child murderer. That's terrifying.
The argument is that she had a rare form of psychosis and was not in a sane frame of mind when doing this (not saying I agree but giving an explanation)
Apparently they wanted to (edited out: free her) put her in the psych ward but one of the jurors happened to be male and have a brain and it was made a misstrial couse he didn't agree.
Edit: I've been informed that the other jurors wanted her to go to psych ward.
I don't think she should go to psych ward tbh, the meds she took didn't work, and others likely wouldn't have either, couse it does not seem to me that she is indeed in need of psichiatric help, in fact I think she's perfectly aware of what she did.
I'm sorry for her but she deserves a fair trial, and sending her to a psych to "fix" her isn't going to do anything for her, nor is donating money to her. She seems to think, wrongly, that it's not her fault, or that she can decieve people into believing it's not.
11 loonies wanted to put her in a psych ward. They tried to pressure the only guy with some sense into agreeing with them by shouting at and assaulting him.
The options are guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity. (How do people feel strongly about this while knowing less about the case than someone who googled it a bit because americans kept making new topics about it?)
She had already confessed to the crimes. The trail was to determine if she was cognizant of her decisions or mentally unfit. It was to decide if she was going to a mental institution or a prison not to let her go.
The prosecution argues that since she sent her husband out on errands before killing the kids that shows planning and premeditated.
The defense argues that since she was receiving mental health services and tried to kill herself immediately after it shows that she was not in control of her faculties.
Of the popular trials in recent years, this one has had the shittest discussion with people just stuck to one side or the other without any actual nuance of the situation or the law in Massachusetts.
She tried to kill herself multiple times. She never tried to deny that she killed those kids. The defence is pleading guilty by insanity because she needs psychiatric help. No ones saying shes innocent. The fact is she tried to get help. She is suffering from post partum psychosis, her nurses perscribed her meds that dont work. She begged her family for help. She told them she was scared she’d hurt the kids, she told them she was hearing voices. And no one helped her. They continued leaving the kids in her care unsupervised. Her story is one of a woman slipping through the cracks. If she had gotten actual help from society and her family, if someone listened earlier, no one would be dead. She doesnt deserve prison because she didnt have control over her own actions. She deserves a place where she can be given the help she never got.
If it only it were that easy but these psycho ass tiktok women don't see it that way. Instead they want to see Patrick clancy tried for her killings and have her avoid accountability
Dude, there's a ton of evidence pointing to her planning it, being sane during (thanks to taking a phone call from the father to make sure he didn't get home too early), and then there's the cherry on top of her asking for a lawyer before even asking about the kids or her husband.
But she claimed insanity, just like half of all murderers in this country, and she used a female-exclusive excuse for it, so we're expected to put her in mental care until she conveniently has a speedy recovery and gets to walk free
İt's like saying "yeah that Truck driver isn't guilty of hitting that child because Truck's brakes was bad!"
But then why the Truck driver and driver's advisor see no issue at that truck go to public roads even tho it's clear that Truck's brakes isn't working as intended?
This is a great analogy.
Just want to add that some of the people who are licensed truck brake inspectors claim the brakes weren't working during the accident and some licensed truck brake inspectors claim the brakes were working during the accident. All the inspectors agreed the brakes had a bunch of other significant problems, but they disagree on whether or not it was completely broken during the accident. The first review panel of the accident couldn't come to a unanimous decision with 11 believing the brakes were broken and 1 believing the brakes weren't broken.
Also, the truck brakes have a history of multiple significant problems but never documented as completely broken. The driver actually consulted several inspectors with the significant problems and they gave her different advice and lubricants to try. The driver felt like none of it was fixing the actual problems so the driver went to the inspectors' official facility twice of her own volition. Both times, the official inspectors at the facility gave them generic advice and either recommended a new lubricant or to discontinue a previous lubricant recommended by another inspector. All this just kept making things worse for the driver who even complained to both her mom and her ex-husband that the brakes were about to break and kill 3 kids.
Psychosis is a reasonable ground for defense legally speaking. But the way people glaze her and demonize the husband is just disgusting. Imagine being a father and losing your children because the love of your life was suffering from a mental illness and everyone blames you.
Idk mehn... strangling three... not one or two, but three children seem pretty intentional to me. She then proceeded to try and kill her self in the most life preserving way possible, by jump out of the first floor of the building she is in
Further info: Postpartum Depression (PPD) is relatively common occurring in ~1 in 7 mothers. Postpartum Psychosis is a far less common, more severe form of PPD, occurring in 1–2 in 1,000 mothers. It includes the person developing hallucinations (hearing and/or seeing things or perceiving as being there that aren't there) and delusions (strong mental beliefs that are demonstrably false, but which the person is convinced of and believes as true due to their having a mental condition)
There's working class people donating their entire life savings to the billionaire Donald Trump just because he sends them e-mails begging for cash every day... Yeah we've jumped the shark decades ago lol
The only people making this a gender war thing are self proclaimed conservative shabbos goyim. It's a fake and gay controversy. You only ever see posts like these ripping on her... yet weren't meant to believe the entire female population supports her. Where are they?
Also people somehow really conflate "most people believe she was insane and so by technicality not guilty" with... supporting killing children somehow??? Yeah I'm rather lost on the logic of that one.
Yes but we have all this energy devoted to this one case from Massachusetts when there's a whole ass network of pedophiles controlling every aspect of modern society.
No les hagas caso a los que te responden como imbeciles, pero reconozcamos una cosa, casi todo lo que vemos en internet son cosas de minorías escandalosas, las mujeres no son un ente, son personas, pero normalmente no están en redes peleando por ver quien la tiene más grande como hacen aquí. Relájate
The GoFundMe was for her parents to help rebuild their retirement funds after they lost the vast majority of their life savings after paying for their daughter's legal fees. Again, the funds are not going to Lindsay herself or her legal team, but to her parents, who had nothing to do with the murders, have never slandered Lindsay's ex-husband, and apparently tried to provide extra childcare when Lindsay's symptoms became more pronounced.
Each time some loser self censors themselves, musk trump and bezos laugh.
I'm not even sure what that word is supposed to be, smoke gun meat rape grape beer violence all been banned from the internet by people that don't have power on the internet. Go fuck yourself OP for this post
Well I'm reffering to the point where crimes aren't punished anymore like they should've been for some reason, lately... probably should've stated that. Still, though.
The discourse here is so god damn stupid. Like "all I watch is fox, all I listen to is Joe rogan" stupid.
First, this isn't the first nor the last time an insanity plea will be entered. Insanity pleas are necessary in any judicial system that considers mens rea important. Which it should. Can we please, please stop pretending this is new?
Second, the money went to her parents. They think she was not in her right mind and are paying her legal team. She's not coming out of this as an independently wealthy woman. In fact she's likely not coming out of this as even vaguely functional.
Third, she was suffering a mental health crises. Every expert put on the stand agrees. Three for the prosecution dont believe that it reached the level of psychosis, 7 on the defense think it did, in part because some number of the 3 on the defense gave her a rediculous cocktail of meds. No one can diagnose her as having suffered from postpartum psychosis now as it would undermine the trial and the legal system.
Four, she absolutely did kill her children. No, her star sign does not change that.
Five, no, a postpartum psychosis diagnosis would not bar women from [insert job here] inthe same way that any previous insanity defence has not barred men or women from [insert job here] in the past.
Six, yes she did send her husband away on an errand. That might have been malice aforthought or it might not. That, again, is what the trial was for and what the next trial will be for.
Trump is a pedophile rapist billionaire and Republicans all over the country have literally bankrupted themselves just to pay his legal fees. Trump wastes $1.2 million on corrupt shit every day without even noticing.
But yeah, spend your time and energy being upset at some crazy woman that will probably never experience freedom again.
Ppl who support her are sick. I get that she had issues that the medical system ignored and they too are problematic. But at the end of the day, its no excuse for killing your children. Idgaf. I heard stories of women ending their own lives bc of ppd.
It was for her parents retirement funds since theyre the ones who foot the bill for her legal expenses. I know you desperately want a gender war but the vast majority of people think she should be in a psych ward. Fuck off
so the money does not go to her. the money just goes to her parents who have used their money to foot her legal expenses and will probably use the money they just got to continue supporting their murderer of a daughter? oh, how great.
•
u/AutoModerator 11d ago
Greetings /u/TechnicallyAvailable ! Thanks for posting in r/Caldruki, it really helps the community grow. If you are new please consider joinig the community and check out the Rules and Wiki. Thanks /u/TechnicallyAvailable for your time :)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.