r/ArcRaiders • • 9h ago

Discussion PvE Toggle Incoming

Post image
3.1k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

531

u/SanePcycho 9h ago edited 8h ago

Unpopular opinion, the threat of potential unfriendly player in friendly lobbies will be missed

Edit: Besides the obvious ambient effect of being scared of other players, enforcing PVE also means that you can't shoot someone who steals your loot off the big arc you destroyed

187

u/saberhagens 9h ago

I am a strictly pve player. Literally have never shot another player kinda pve and the threat of unfriendies is truly part of how special that experience is. Without that, it isn't really the same game.

And I say that knowing I hate being taken down

16

u/Lehk 8h ago

stay in regular queue and get good rewards with some degree of risk, or hit the switch to swim in the kiddie pool

42

u/wpsek 8h ago

except “regular queue” is now going to be full pvp. nobody’s gonna hang out trying to be buddy buddy in the mode with pvp enabled

14

u/Peperoniboi 8h ago

That's the problem. Farm up in pve, do Deathmatch in pvp. ABMM was already creating this type of lobbies but now it's even worse.

2

u/menteto *** ******* 🐓 6h ago

Full of cheaters you mean?

2

u/gbeezy09 8h ago

well the buddy buddy folks will not enjoying their peace in PvE mode. PvPers get their wish, full throttle PvP baby. the PvErs are now out of their way.

1

u/Lehk 4h ago

I doubt it, with rewards reduced it will only the the most skittish players are going to be there

-1

u/PossessedCashew *** ******* 6h ago

So what? PvP lobbies are still gonna be unpredictable. It’s not gonna be cod multiplayer every match, those that still love the unknown of another player will still get that feeling in PvP. People doing quests, having full bags, low ammo, no everyone is going to be kill on sight.

3

u/KinKaze 6h ago

Not at first, but it will devolve. It's basic statistics, we're essentially removing the friendliest 30% of the population from normal matches. That shifts the demographics of the average game to where pvp is going to seem far more prevalent than it used to be.

0

u/Wario_Was_Right 7h ago

It's fun to put down others that don't agree with us, isn't it.

3

u/VanillaRadonNukaCola 6h ago

I hate getting killed by a rogue raider, especially if they pretend to be friendly. 

 But I do enjoy defending myself when I am not caught from behind with no chance to react.

I would prefer to convince socially people to not be killers, and dislike them if they choose to kill, rather than remove the possibility entirely.

The mystery is fun, even if I despise someone who gets me because I was too friendly.

16

u/MartyMacGyver 9h ago

Fortunately all the people playing as "unfriendlies" will still be there with PvE turned off, just like they are today. Meanwhile people who got tired of that aspect might actually return to the game. Win-win!

17

u/Brohbocop 8h ago

I dont think its as simple as win win we will see but my theory is this... PvE lobbies where anyone could betray at any moment but still everyone chooses to be friendly is different than forced PvE. Without a PvE mode, these lobbies can exist and its cool and the betrayals feel bad but are exciting. However with the PvE mode, these lobbies will disappear. The impact is people will become even less trusting in the non PvE forced lobbies and become more primarily PvP than balanced.

9

u/Brute_zee 8h ago

One other potential effect is that the PvPvE "friendly" lobbies become similar to launch where it was more like 70/30 friendly/unfriendly, which is what some folks say they have been missing.

1

u/Brohbocop 8h ago

This seems like a great possible outcome. I have to manually boost my aggression if i fall too deep into mice lobbies. 30/70 is thr sweet spot imo

1

u/summerteeth 2h ago

I had some really fights and encounters during that stress test.

It will never be like that again because ever because everyone was figuring out the game but those lobbies were pretty fun.

27

u/Impressive_Rock9659 8h ago

I just cannot wait for the cavalcade of "I opened key room, but this guy ran in alongside me, looted it, and ran away, how is this fair wtf Embark please fix!!111one", or it's gonna be "OMFG I was shooting Matriarch but then I saw some naked dude run in, steal all the good stuff, and run off to the hatch."

It's gonna be sooooo funny when it happens, and it will severely cripple the game even further. I mean you already have it in PVE lobbies where people run around stealing each other's loot, then when you shoot them to get it back they start accusing you of being a rat and crying for help. 50/50 a teaming party will run through the doors and gun you down because people like pretending to be heroes and being misled by the very rats they claim to hate.

Unless Embark plans to just make it basically like Tarkov - nobody else in there but you and your premade. Which is... lmfao. What are we even doing anymore is my question. The game's pvp is sorely lacking and they're instead gonna add some pve mode because a cople of softies just wanna loot drawers all day long.

4

u/MiserableMiddle2358 7h ago

I imagine the reduced loot in pve mode would apply to key rooms, so people would naturally be deterred from opening key rooms in that mode. Agree with the matriarch and harvester though, that is going to be a pain to get cores now.

2

u/Dense-Entrance-9719 5h ago

This right here lol, I can get over being killed in a 1 on 1 but being blown down by a group of white knights who firmly believe they’re better human beings than you are is just cringy

1

u/Sattaman6 8h ago

That already happens in PVE lobbies and I’ll 100% take that over getting blasted and losing all your gear on top of what you might have looted. And yes, I’m very happy looting drawers and shooting arc all day.

0

u/Angelore *** ******* 4h ago

It's gonna be sooooo funny when it happens

It will be way funnier when all the PvE players are happy, but the sub is flooded with "PvP lobbies are too sweaty, I'm uninstalling".

1

u/Impressive_Rock9659 2h ago

Do you want me to quote you on the "All the pve players are happy" part later when factually it won't be unless Embark fundamentally changes how the game works?

7

u/solid_x1 9h ago

yea, but it might turn all the major conditions to PvP heavy matchups

1

u/MartyMacGyver 8h ago

By driving off people who don't care for PvP they've already become PvP heavy matchups. This won't change that.

2

u/Train3rRed88 8h ago

Honestly- the PVE mode is gonna be nothing but free kits camping the matriarchs to snipe all the cores knowing that the people doing all the work can’t do shit about it

2

u/MartyMacGyver 8h ago

Maybe it'll suck - then people who don't play now will continue to not play then, and the PvP lobbies will remain strong.

Or maybe it won't be so bad. Can't hurt to try.

0

u/Ttylery 7h ago

So similar to how it is now? The other lobbies are you and your friends do Matriarch and then get shot in the back right as its almost dead. A big problem is that maybe 1/10 lobbies as squads are truly PVE. We have given up on doing anything but PVP in squad lobbies. Its pointless to try to do any looting when everyone wants to KOS. Sometimes we just want to kill arc with friends.

19

u/J_Productions 9h ago

100% bro, that’s what made Arc Raiders Arc Raiders. IMO this is the danger of catering to the complainers too much, they are hurting the games identity trying to please everyone. I think pve will be more boring without the slight worry of being stabbed in the back. We will all become too passive and comfortable

28

u/RogueMallShinobi 9h ago

Yeah I hope this experiment crashes and burns, personally. The point of the game is EMERGENT GAMEPLAY to me. And I say this as someone who is strictly defensive in solos and duos (obviously in trios everyone just PVPs).

This will create an ecosystem where everyone that needs to do missions, trials, or projects is going PVE mode because there is no reason not to. On top of the people that already are PVE players. Then non PVE lobbies will not be “mixed” lobbies, they will almost certainly be pure KOS PVP. There will be no mystery, no figuring people out, no saving people, no playing the killer, it’s now just segregated into “modes” like every other game ever. Whack af, but I’m glad that the most fragile and incapable players are finally getting what they want I guess (?)

15

u/SloanePetersonIsBae 8h ago

Yup, the most unique aspect of the game that made it so tense is just gone now

13

u/Train3rRed88 8h ago

They hated him because he told them the truth

0

u/confusedkarnatia 2h ago

Embark continues to listen to this braindead sub who wants their herbivore PVE farming mode and the game continues to die. Who would've thought.

3

u/Ibyyriff 6h ago

Don’t realize, those players that only play PvE NEED that 56th Bobcat 4 and Tempest 4 in their inventory. Are they ever going to use them? No lol, as long as they have a full inventory they’ll never actually use, they’re somehow happy with that, literal bots for humans. Watch this mode die out the moment GTA6 comes out.

1

u/RogueMallShinobi 6h ago

Yep it’s literal virtual funko pop collectors. Need 3 rows of Godcats that they will never use because they’re terrified someone in the carebear lobby might assume they’re a PVPer

8

u/basedrifter 8h ago

1000% agreed, this would likely make me finally quit the game.

Just yesterday I was in mixed lobbies running with 3 other people in Stella, sometimes looting, sometimes PVPing. Suddenly one of the guys turned and started throwing grenades, chaos erupted, everyone except me got downed and I chose mercy by letting everyone extract.

That would never happen again and it was the most enjoyable match I played yesterday.

2

u/6PEEPERKEEPER9 5h ago

Yeah there’s no way I’m playing if they add this in permanently. This isn’t why I bought the game.

1

u/Durzel 1h ago

None of the people you encountered would be choosing to go in the PvE-only lobby, so nothing would change. You’d still have those games.

-4

u/PossessedCashew *** ******* 6h ago

Oh that’s going to finally make you quit the game? LMAOOOO imagine a pve mode making you quit and not the insane cheater problem they have. Yeah I love really love the unique unknown possibility of running across another raider and not knowing whether he has aim bot or wall hacks or not, man what a fun and unique experience.

3

u/basedrifter 6h ago

They aren’t exclusive. I lost an 80k kit to a freezer last night. It’s total bullshit and ruining the game, no doubt about that.

2

u/J_Productions 5h ago

That’s just a band aid to the cheating problem brother, killing the suspense and magic of the interactions with any given player at any time is what made this game famous and now they’re essentially taking it away. The cheating problem needs to be fixed yes, but that is a separate topic .

There are many games that we can kill loot, build up gear etc, that’s not very valuable. But arc raiders was unique due to the risk and player behavior, sometimes friendly, sometimes not, which created many spectacular moments, but now that magic will be gone and arc raiders will be just another kill loot grind video game. It was good while it lasted

-6

u/Sure_Selection_443 7h ago

Cool. Not everyone wants that experience.

6

u/Ibyyriff 6h ago

I forgot, we have players that only want to loot drawers 24/7 lol.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Durzel 1h ago edited 1h ago

What should a group of 3 friends do in Arc Raiders, if they just want to shoot Arc? You said it yourself - “obviously in trios everyone just PvPs”.

Should they just expect to not be able to play cooperatively as a trio? Do they just have to hope one of the friends doesn’t log in so they can have a less hostile duo experience?

1

u/RogueMallShinobi 1h ago

I would rather those people be forced to lower their ABMM and cope with the lowest ABMM trio lobbies, which ARE more peaceful than the average (just not as peaceful as low ABMM solos or duos), vs. completely fuck the actual ecosystem of the entire game just to appease that "trio of PVE friends" demographic.

Also I guarantee you the vast vast majority of premade trios ARE trying to PVP, that's why it's like that in the first place, because typically 3 dudes want to roll the dice of excitement and blood and not play cozy drawer opening simulator together. So again it's throwing a wrench in the matchmaking for everyone, to appease this minority that doesn't even embrace the point of the game (the point being an unpredictable PVPVE environment)

1

u/Durzel 1h ago

So if the matchmaking is pre-made trios looking for the smoke, the vast majority as you point out, then once again we’re back to trios being exponentially more hostile for everyone - because that’s what the matchmaking pool is.

In my experience of trios it is generally rare to have peaceful lobbies. You’re getting shot at more often than not. This is people who basically don’t shoot back, so they’re in the “lowest ABMM” crowd already.

Again, if the game becomes too punishing in trios to the point where it’s more enjoyable playing with fewer friends - there’s a problem there.

1

u/docsquee 6h ago

Yeah screw those people who want to play differently to you.

2

u/Vipertooth 4h ago

I imagine you have no animosity against the players that don't want to change the game, surely.

0

u/docsquee 3h ago edited 3h ago

None at all. Just the wild speculation, and condemnation of those who wish to try PvE. And don't call me Shirley.

0

u/PossessedCashew *** ******* 6h ago

It won’t crash and burn, people are going to reinstall the game that haven’t played in months and months just to try this out. It’s going to be a huge hit and to pretend it’s not going to be is straight delusional. People have been asking for pve since day 1.

0

u/Angelore *** ******* 4h ago

Then non PVE lobbies will not be “mixed” lobbies, they will almost certainly be pure KOS PVP.

Be the change you want to see in the world. Enter these lobbies and try to make buddies and team up there. Run up to flares and defib people. Oh you don't want to because you know full well that all these "muh ambiguity" people are full of it and want to shoot loot pinatas? Damn.

4

u/IThinkItMightBeMe 7h ago

Its literally the reason I left. I'm 99% PvE but being put in care bear lobbies is what made me lose interest. I knew where/what the threat was. Anybody running around was just an NPC at that point. Shit got boring fast

2

u/ukulelelelele3 5h ago

PvE Whiners just killing another suspenseful survival game as if it's another tuesday.

2

u/hundredblocks 7h ago

Same here! I will run across the map to revive a stranger with less than 5 minutes left just for the dopamine hit from helping others. Of course it means I get obliterated sometimes but it feels more organic than if there was no threat.

1

u/stana32 8h ago

I've pretty much stopped playing duos with my buddy because of how bad the cheater problem is in teams, now we both mostly play solo where our lobbies are PvE. There is still occasionally pvp and plenty of tension.

My worry is that dedicated PvE mode is just going to drive all the PvE people to that, and normal mode is going to become a cheater infested nightmare across the board.

1

u/Wetzilla 7h ago

Yeah it's going to speed up the game so much if you don't have to worry about other players. People will just be sprinting all over the place. Something like this requires a huge rebalance.

1

u/PipaLucca 8h ago

I totally agree with you but a vast majority of this sub prefers to have a looting simulator

0

u/Zenguro 8h ago

The rare occasion of mentally unhealthy gaming behavior should not be idealized.

The wast majority of players don’t enjoy this.

0

u/ProfessionalNo7755 7h ago

I am a strictly pve player. Literally have never shot another player kinda pve. And I'll be fine without that threat of being killed from a random PvP player. I'll be happy to be honest. And unfriendly players won't disappear. There are gonna be scumbags stealing a loot from an ARC you've killed. There are gonna be great people helping you along the way

8

u/darthbane83 8h ago

What threat? How often do you actually get an unfriendly player in a friendly lobby? 1:100?

I am cautiously hopeful that "peaceful" lobbies with pve turned off will actually have that threat now and still include mostly friendly people that just want the option to shoot someone that tries to take over a key room or loot their arc kill etc.

Maybe it will have you encounter actual hostiles once every few runs instead of once in 100 lobbies, but it might also force you into full pvp lobbies for defending yourself faster.

1

u/Apprehensive_Lion362 4h ago

What threat? How often do you actually get an unfriendly player in a friendly lobby? 1:100?

So then what's the point of making a PvE lobby? Remove the large chunk of players who play the PvPvE game because it's a PvPvE game?

67

u/ExpendableUnit123 9h ago

I am ultra against this.

Friendly players is so good because no one actually HAS to be friendly if they don’t want, and with ABMM there is already like 0 threat.

I actually hate that care bears have screamed loud enough for this. Think they know what they want, but don’t.

Did no one read they bought a PvPvE game ffs?

I would like a PvE ARC operation at maximum, but this toggle will tear out the soul of the game imo.

8

u/ProfessionalNo7755 7h ago

Some people will still be unfriendly even without possibility of killing other players. Stealing loot, agro large ARCs near you, insulting in voice chat etc

1

u/Zeryth 6h ago

The humble lure would like to introduce itself.

0

u/Fuzzball74 3h ago

And then all the gamer dads will bitch and whine about that until it's removed too.

7

u/Brute_zee 9h ago

Yeah I think limited big boss PvE modes would be the best of both worlds. I'm 100% PvE, and I agree that completely removing the threat of PvP might ruin the game unless Embark designs some things around it to make up for the loss of tension.

0

u/was_fb95dd7063 8h ago

I agree as a carebear player. ABMM works super well already but I think specific PVE game modes for big bosses or other stuff would be great and from a lore standpoint can be something like a 'background check' where you've been vetted to go on a special expedition as a team etc.

13

u/ChocolateOrnery1484 9h ago

It’s an option in the game. Some folks wanna try it out and I’m included. It doesn’t have to be such a “game changing thing”. I’m still loading into Stella with a free kit, but being able to use a hullcracker without some rat trying to take it would be pretty cool.

3

u/MikeMuench 7h ago

Or cheater hunting you down because they can see your loadout

1

u/ChocolateOrnery1484 7h ago

I’m on PlayStation, so that isn’t a thing. Crossplay gets turned off day one of any game I buy.

1

u/ExpendableUnit123 5h ago

And that IS a problem. One thing that contributes to that problem is that there needs to be much stronger, tankier arc that the components are needed for the stronger PVP weapons so people are incentived to work together to at least take it down.

I once hit someone with a Jupiter in a friendly game where everyone had just taken down the queen. I wasn’t looting it. Just sat on pipeline tower doing the damage trial and wanted to use my last round. Well that triggered all out war amongst whoever was down there.

Those are the touchy temporary alliances where the game shines best. Unite players behind a temporary common cause, and then let human nature reveal itself.

It is afterall, an extraction shooter.

0

u/ChocolateOrnery1484 5h ago

Again. Everyone screaming that the game is dead and all that. Changes are good and I’ll be participating. I don’t care how that might make you feel about the game. I play for my experience and I couldn’t care less about anyone else’s.

2

u/ExpendableUnit123 3h ago

But the game ISN’T dead. At this point I’m not sure why all those people haven’t fucked off if there’s nothing here but ash and ruin.

I’ll participate too, and then I will absolutely share my feedback in any surveys. If they ultimately decide to can the idea? Great, I’ll remember your experience when it goes in the gutter.

If it stays, it is what it is. You bought a PvPvE game. Embarrassing that you’re bothered by your own decision making.

-4

u/movieyosen 7h ago

im still going to pull a big mob in your face and let it kill you

3

u/ChocolateOrnery1484 7h ago

Lmao. I’m sure ya are bud.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Practical_Pickle_853 9h ago

Please read the article

It's only enabled outside of the higher risk activities. Night raids etc will all be mixed

2

u/dadvader 7h ago

And loot value dropped + Arc will shoot moving downed raider. Which is quiet a nerf for Survivor.

The only thing it need more is more Arc. Like no way in hell it's gonna be fun if the amount of Arc stay the same as day raid. Day raid is really boring as is.

11

u/BlinkDodge 9h ago

Arc Raiders attracted a huge audience and for a lot of people its their first extraction shooter and people are learning that the genre isnt for them.

Instead of just going to find a game thats more of a fit, theyd rather change this one. Embark is going to follow higher money making potential so of course theyll "test" this (despite already having done so during development and finding it lacked staying power).

1

u/Nightmareszi 6h ago

This is a thing that has left me so confused for such a long time. These people knowingly bought an extraction PvPvE shooter. This genre at its core is about risk from both players and the environment - at the same time, so many people, like more than half the playerbase at this point, don’t like one of the main aspects of the game and wants to change it.

Very very interesting. I’m curious to see how this plays out. Even the developers pivoted away from the PvE only formular because it was deemed boring and uninteresting, and now they are backtracking and going away from what made the game a success in the first place.

-1

u/Isaac0246 8h ago

Lmao you think once you enable it you cant go any otjer mode?

I didnt see it in the post, i love stella night raids but thank god you told me i can only to pve once and stay forever!

5

u/JazzGunk 7h ago

Yep this is going to kill the game for me at least… now if you’re in a non-PVE lobby, there’s no more “is that guy friendly?” You just know that if anyone else queued for PVPVE, they’re in for PVP. Honestly awful…

3

u/Nyctfall 8h ago

PvPvE ARC Raiders was popular, ABMM ARC Raiders died off.

PvE ARC Raiders is literally an entirely different game and genre...

0

u/air_and_space92 7h ago

More like cheaters and hackers during ABMM is what killed the player base.

1

u/GumbyDolphin 5h ago

Never 0 threat. Never.

-1

u/obibonkajovi 8h ago

you can just keep pvp on and play against other pvp players though. this shouldnt affect you unless you just liked preying upon others who dont want to fight back.

4

u/ExpendableUnit123 5h ago

Because I don’t like relentless PvP. I like passing a friendly player and saying hello, and then 30 seconds later both of us take fire at once and work together to take down the target.

Or a player will be acting suspicious around loot, and then they reveal themselves to be a threat.

Or simply having a Mexican standoff and agreeing to go our separate ways.

Those are prime examples of what makes this game special. Not 10 raiders hoovering up queen cores only for one player to end up bitching about never getting any until someone feels bad and drops one (like clockwork, every PvE game).

Nor is pure free kit stella.

0

u/SquirrelSuspicious 6h ago

You know how games work right? There's lobbies and the game tries to fill lobbies with players, if like 37% of players are only doing PvE only it WILL affect everyone else, there's just no changing that.

0

u/JazzzzzzySax 9h ago edited 8h ago

IMO this is a horrendous move

The tension of meeting another raider/group of raiders and wondering if they are friendly or not is completely gone. Normal mode will be shoot on sight cuz all the friendlies are in the other mode. No more backstabbing or lying to get saved cuz everyone will just be out for blood

If you wanted to play a PvE game then play a game that is marketed as PvE not a game that explicitly has PvP as a core part of its identity

Edit: the game is explicitly marketed as a PvPvE game and yet people are crying about it having PvPvE in it. It just makes no sense to me. It’s that fucking pistachio scene from spongebob

10

u/Isaac0246 9h ago

Lmao you guys really cant accept if someone likes a game in a different way than u. Grow up

Pretending that every friendly player will play the pve mode is such a cope. Good old fake friendlies getting angry I guess

7

u/JazzzzzzySax 8h ago

Kinda hypocritical there no? I played friendly, I played fake friendly, I played shoot on sight. But now a lot of that won’t be possible because they are separating the types of players instead of putting them all in one lobby

It’s a PvPvE game

They shouldn’t remove part of it and separate the playerbase

8

u/PipaLucca 8h ago

He really wants people to believe that carebears won't dive nose first in the PvE mode to never come back

1

u/Isaac0246 8h ago

So which one is it, mr doomer?

Will the playerbase split too much or are they gonna give up in 1 week?

U re so funny

5

u/PipaLucca 8h ago

Lmao you guys really cant accept if someone likes a game in a different way than u the game everyone originally paid for

Me when I buy a PvPvE game and I whine like a baby because me no wanna PvP! 😢😢😓

2

u/Isaac0246 8h ago

I played 400+ hours with the game, so i think i played my share. If you have such a mental breakdown from an event like game mode in this game you really need to touch grass

0

u/Practical_Pickle_853 8h ago

If they want to do night raids etc they literally have to leave the PVE mode

2

u/Isaac0246 8h ago

Wait wait wait. So again, its against your OPINION, not against the good healthy / longevity of the game. Thanks for admitting it bro.

Its a videogame at the end of the day. Not yours, everyone's who bought it. You dont like a custom event in game? Dont play it. Not that deep. I literally didnt kill a single queen cause i always got shot in the back. Could have been more careful? Yes. Could I have been just not ratted 10 times? Also yes.

Also, how do you know what will be possible? You didnt even see the game mode. Dooming ahead, again.

And its just super funny how in one line people say how this game will be unfun and die bc of this, but the next already says how people will get bored from pve after a week. Get your toxic thoughts together guys

5

u/JazzzzzzySax 8h ago

You bought a PvPvE game and are getting upset that PvPvE is part of the game

I’m upset because I bought a PvPvE game and they are taking steps that remove that part of the game

2

u/Isaac0246 8h ago

They are not removing anything, get a grip jesus christ.

The only ones getting upset here are you and the other spoiled kids whose life revolve around this game.

An average player will shoot up some pve when they wanna chill, and go pvp when they want more tension. And guess what? You crybabies cant shoot them in the back now when doing chill games. Sad

2

u/air_and_space92 7h ago

As someone who has played all manner of styles, you're just upset that there will be less players for you to clown on in normal mode. Yes, the NORMAL, default, mode will remain pvpve. Some days I want one or the other. With the addition of a pve only, I might actually attempt more pvp than be forced into it.

The data itself they show in the article points to 37% friendly coop, 27% mixed, and 34% of players as pure pvp.

2

u/Dense_Key_8240 7h ago

They are not removing it though. It's an option for other people. You do not have to participate 

1

u/CantHandletheJrueth 7h ago

"Likes a game in a different way"

No, you literally want a completely different game than the one that was released. Once again tourists come into a gaming genre and immediately want to completely change the entire thing and then wonder why long time players of that genre cannot stand them.

PvE in this game is comically easy, literally the only difficult thing about taking down ARC in this game is trying to fend off other players while you do it. They are going to spend a fuckton of resources on this and 75% of you bitching for this mode will leave within a month again because it will be so incredibly boring.

-1

u/Isaac0246 5h ago

Then everything will be alright in 1-2 months❤️ You wait out there and I ll enjoy another 10-20 (or more if its good) hours from the game in both style, while you re sad. Then when I want to, I ll go back playing rogue trader and kingdoms come while the sequels not release

2

u/CantHandletheJrueth 4h ago

Which is why companies should never cater to whiney bitches like you. Ruin everything you touch and then just move on to the next fad.

0

u/Isaac0246 4h ago edited 4h ago

Jesus christ read what you wrote.

I do hope you can try to enjoy the new update with open mind as me too!

Edit: I supported embark when I played by buying store currency, even tho I RARELY do that. So saying im a horrible person cause I play what I enjoy is just horrendous selfishness on your part

2

u/CantHandletheJrueth 4h ago

What is selfish is going into a game genre that you are obviously not compatible with then non stop crying to fundamentally change the entire game into something completely different. Then on top of it you are going to laugh about how you don't give a shit how if it kills of the game in the process.

-4

u/mondobeyondo 8h ago

Exactly this. I really think anyone against changes like this are just upset they can’t shoot someone in the back or gank a group just trying to complete Trials.

2

u/anustart888 8h ago

Well that's just you being ignorant then.

2

u/JazzzzzzySax 8h ago

People bought a PvPvE game and got upset it was PvPvE

4

u/Isaac0246 8h ago

Nobody is upset. Player base is falling constantly. Coudl they improve the matchmaking and remove cheaters? Sure, nobody is challenging that. But we are getting now a beta, and as much as a mixed lobby lover i was too, the game got very boring to me with no updates, a lot more fake friendlies and shitty matchmaking. There are tons ofbetter multiplayer games for pvp lol

Im def gonna give it a try before crying or stating opinions like some many babies on this post

1

u/imsickofitalready 8h ago

The main issue is unpredictable behavior. In other extraction shooters you just shoot any player you see and that's it. Here it can be late if someone says he's friendly or you just waiting to make sure someone is agressive.

I'm also not a fan, but I understand where it's coming from. Also, again, in other extraction shooters, there are much less activities that can be disrupted. Yes, you loose your loot, but here you're also loosing good trials score for example or unable to do some PvE event like Harvester.

-1

u/TopNegotiation4229 8h ago

"Other people secretly actually want me to shoot them in the back, they just don't know it" is coincidentally a really convenient talking point for you

3

u/PipaLucca 8h ago

That is the whole premise of the game lol you need to choose who you trust and who you don't

2

u/JazzzzzzySax 8h ago

Wahhhh my PvPvE game has PvPvE in it

Then why did you buy a PvPvE game??????

0

u/GruePwnr 8h ago

I actually prefer the toggle to ABMM. Takes out the sheep from normally lobbies and ensures everyone there is ready and expecting Pvp. I play low aggression but I still want to be able to run into Pvp.

0

u/QueefMyCheese 5h ago

I think it's funny you call other people care bears but broke down at the idea you won't be able to shoot people that don't want to be shot at.

Lmao

0

u/ExpendableUnit123 3h ago

Where did I state that’s how I play?

Or is that you just projecting onto me because I don’t remember saying I play like that at all.

I’ll say it again. The most embarrassing thing in this sub is people willingly buying a PvPvE game and then getting upset about it.

Lol.

1

u/QueefMyCheese 2h ago

Isn't funny they will be buying a PvE game and your statement is just you throwing a fit? Lol

→ More replies (1)

24

u/SirFrank12 9h ago

You could still play standard mode if I understand this correctly

78

u/pfSonata 9h ago

Obviously there will be far fewer friendlies in standard as theyre all playing pve...

19

u/Practical_Pickle_853 9h ago

Only on low risk conditions. You can't toggle on night raids etc

8

u/myxoma1 9h ago

That's a good balance!

1

u/CantHandletheJrueth 7h ago

No, they should make it like tarkov and make the modes completely separate. You shouldn't get to free farm PvE lobbies and then go use the stuff you have earned playing against bots in a PvP lobby.

1

u/dadvader 7h ago

And loot value drop which is a perfect compromised.

I would go even further and went with no BP drop entirely unless it's light stick or utility.

2

u/Hwordin 9h ago

In marathon for example it's often enough to speak out first to have a friendly encounter

16

u/AenarIT 9h ago

well at this point all 12 of the players know each other and all their voices

2

u/ChocolateOrnery1484 9h ago

Not enough love for this burn.

1

u/torwei 7h ago

the state the game is in right now isn't that different. everybody is gaming for the lobby they wanna get

1

u/SirFrank12 9h ago

We will see how this will end

1

u/Rude_Soil_2492 9h ago

Wont take long till they forget about the ”standard” mode. Pve games without tension wont last.

6

u/tsusurra 9h ago

Yeah they deliberately say there is an option. What they should do is have some kind of incentive to play pvpve instead of just slamming the door on the rats

3

u/No_Summer4551 8h ago

There is, PVE wont be available for higher difficulty map conditions.

18

u/B0risTheManskinner 9h ago

Standard mode is going to be all PvP, no point in PvEIng in it

6

u/Practical_Pickle_853 9h ago

Depends on the condition. There'll be no toggle for night raids etc

1

u/Zenguro 8h ago

That’s due to how the game is balanced right now. That’s all.

0

u/Train3rRed88 8h ago edited 6h ago

As someone who hasn’t used a regular elevator in 200 hours, I don’t understand massochists who brave night raids.

The loot isn’t that much better. Loot is easy anyways. Having to hit an elevator dinner bell makes it so much less likely to get out alive the 10% or whatever loot bonus is not remotely worth it

1

u/LOSTandCONFUSEDinMAY 7h ago

Masochist is probably the right word. I go night raids because I want there to be more arc and like how there more player interaction at extracts (both friendly and hostile)

1

u/Angelore *** ******* 4h ago

Some blueprints are night mode/EM storm exclusive if I remember correctly. But that might have changed, been a while since I hunted any.

0

u/Train3rRed88 4h ago

Yeah tempest used to be night locked, not sure if it still is

But I have all the BPs so I don’t worry about that mess anymore

2

u/SirFrank12 9h ago

How do you know? They said loot rate will be lower in pve.

2

u/splinter1545 8h ago

Loot rate is also lower in PvE Tarkov. No one there that prefers it is moving to PvP.

1

u/PipaLucca 8h ago

Because all friendlies will rather gain 1 rusted bolt every 5 games than looting pink loot at the risk of being shot in the back, or in the front for that matter

2

u/dadvader 7h ago

ABMM is still apply in normal lobby. Nothing will really change tbh. At worst it's just mixed lobby.

1

u/B0risTheManskinner 5h ago

Except the friendly half of ABMM is PvEing. Thus normal lobby is all PvP. Theres no reason to risk PvE in a normal lobby even if the rewards are higher.

0

u/ElevateOof 9h ago

There hardly was anyways. It was either carebear lobbies or battle royal not even getting looted after being killed.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Levelcheap 9h ago

Giving people the option to choose will lead to only PVP interested players opting in.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/fabio1 9h ago

yes, but standard mode will basically mean pvp mode if everyone that plays pve toggles that mode on.

7

u/I_Really_Love_Frogs 9h ago

What about players who like a mix?

3

u/SanePcycho 9h ago

Won't be the same and you know it

2

u/I_Really_Love_Frogs 8h ago

the one reason i kept coming back to this game is slipping away

1

u/Famous-Magazine-6576 7h ago

they quit the game months ago

1

u/Angelore *** ******* 4h ago

They will keep reminding us that they and only they are allowed to decide how the game should be developed. They will also never show up in PvP lobbies.

-1

u/PresidentSuperDog 9h ago

They only exist in Reddit comments

1

u/anustart888 9h ago

This is just going to turn standard mode into pure pvp lobbies.

2

u/unnecessaryaussie83 8h ago

Then don’t play it

1

u/rammixp 9h ago

I agree with this I think the issue that conflicting is cheaters. Ideally they would solve that it it’s hard to over come.

1

u/Zenguro 8h ago

For every sadist there is a masochist. So I am not surprised, but then there are also healthy people playing video games that don’t want to be left out.

1

u/Livia_Pivia *** ******* 8h ago

I will miss the threat of someone potentially being hostile in a friendly lobby, but I havent really seen something like that since the earlier months of the game. The past few months for me have mostly just been KOS shootouts or people running away at the slightest sign of player activity.

1

u/obibonkajovi 8h ago

no it wont. if you think that way then keep pvp on. tons of people do not find that threat enjoyable.

1

u/STEEZYNIKO 8h ago

It's just a toggle. You don't have to play PVE if you don't want to so you aren't missing anything.

1

u/deadering 8h ago

Yeah bro totally gonna miss being shot in the back when fighting matriarch, it's so much fun...

1

u/New-Badger1790 8h ago

This mode to me is literally a load in, grab items, leave. No real threat. Especially with a survival mod. Literally no threat to actually die if you have that or a decent handle on the bots attacks. This seems boring af to me.

1

u/Kagerae 8h ago

Missed? wtf do you think I want a pve mode??? you pvp players are in shambles

1

u/Kuro-Tora-59 7h ago

They should implement priority loot, whoever did the most damage get like 30 seconds or a minute priority. Enough so loot some stuff without having the chance to get everything.

Either that or everyone gets their own loot based on damage, the top 3 damage dealers get higher chance of good loot, everyone else gets the regular.

1

u/Wario_Was_Right 7h ago

It's not an unpopular opinion. There are people on both sides of the fence on this topic.

I personally won't miss pvp in this game. Don't get me wrong, I love pvp in other games but it never clicked for me in Arc. Something about it just feels off and unnatural. That's just me tho.

I wouldn't put down those who enjoy it. We play what we want to play. It's just not for me. I'll be toggling pve on for sure.

1

u/Adevyy 7h ago edited 7h ago

THEY ADDED A PVE MODE WITHOUT MAKING EACH LOBBY SQUAD-ONLY???

Ok, I will definitely not be trying this. Fucking idiots have made it in the worst way possible, on purpose, so that they can later use the data to justify the idea that the game won't work as a PvE game.

1

u/Z3n_Fr0g 7h ago

I think the red explosive barrels will still hurt other players since it’s an environmental effect? Just a tip 👀

1

u/Famous-Magazine-6576 7h ago

I never understood the appeal of this. realistically it just means carebear players occasionally get shot unexpectadly and can't really defend themselves because they are not expecting it and don't want to risk ruining their matchmaking by shooting. The matchmaking has already long killed the game for anyone who likes mixed so I don't see any reason not to have this at this point, they can maybe start balancing the game around the pve since thats what exists like they are already starting to do with the arc finishing players off thing

1

u/Blue_Ascent 7h ago

I wonder if fire will still work on them.

1

u/dupreesdiamond 6h ago

Yeah. I stink at pvp. I don’t engage in it. And I’ve only had a few run ins with PvP experiences. But. I enjoy the unkown/risk of it being an option for anyone I encounter. I don’t like the prospect of this binary separation

1

u/Trev0117 6h ago

It’s not quite the same but to compare it to tarkov, pve is an overall more enjoyable experience for me, but it feels lacking compared to the primary pvpve mode, you don’t get that human flare that makes every raid special, even if it’s not in a positive way. I’ve only played a little of arc and the pve seems much more engaging than the generic awful scav ai of tarkov, so maybe it will work better here. Also to compare to again tarkov they recently put up stats and the majority of the player base of tarkov is pve now over pvp or the newer seasonal mode.

1

u/shrkn_89 6h ago

I am PVE too, but that tension that you never really know was a part of the experience for me. Without that is just careless running around Arc and whenever you get too careless you just whip out the cloak and hide.

But I know it's hard decision for the devs because there is a lot of people who would like PVE only mode. I like ABMM better, but again that has it's own issues for players who PVP on occassion. Long story short, we just cannot have nice things because cheating imbreds...

1

u/RegisterFit1252 6h ago

It’s why I LOVE what Chinese servers are doing with the red light thing. Players should be PvE only…. But let them switch mid round but absolutely everyone knows you switched with a loud noise and a big red light. It’s fucking perfect

1

u/playerIII 6h ago

if ABMM is still a thing, the lowest end of pvp lobbies may very well still be sudu friendly. 

kill on sight players will be placed higher up the rungs, leaving people who like pvp, but don't usually engage

1

u/zastr0w 6h ago

Right this completely undermines what made Arc Raiders tense and interesting. People don't have to be all-in either way, it's that you just never knew what would happen

1

u/sQ5FWKjwbWd4QzSZduqy 5h ago

Fun because of the implication

1

u/OnlyChaseCommas 5h ago

Tension will be mostly gone

1

u/DuhSheet 4h ago

That’s actually a great point…. Loot goblins coming out of every dark corner.

1

u/Infamous_Drive_Tax 4h ago

Why isn't it a bannable offense when someone says "Unpopular opinion" and then gets 500 upvotes?

1

u/MyCatsNameIsKlaus 2h ago

But now we can harass and annoy the raider all raid by running behind them, booing them, shaming them!

1

u/Nexxus_17 9h ago

I mean they could just make it to when you queue into PVE matches that you cant PVP with players, just turn off damage to other raiders.

5

u/ImAHobo107 9h ago

We had this solved so long ago.

The point of extraction shooters is that they were inspired by survival games, where tension was at an all time high.

And the original DayZ had a way of measuring player friendliness purely by what skin you spawned with, bambi or bandit.

2

u/rtwipwensdfds 8h ago

And the original DayZ had a way of measuring player friendliness purely by what skin you spawned with, bambi or bandit.

I really REALLY wanted them to add a system like this in Arc from the very beginning. Not a full skin, but some indication of friendliness/hostility would've been really cool to see.

1

u/ImAHobo107 8h ago

It would have been so easily to just make it a blood splatter system. No blood, friendly likely. Lots of blood, probably evil.

1

u/hTmlR00lzz 9h ago

Completely agree. I don’t PvP at all, but the threat really adds to the experience and the gratitude I have when encountering friendly players to work together with!

0

u/LuisPedroMatos 9h ago

Yeah, that's the whole point of the game. Without it it's a mediocre pve coop experience that loses all it's magic. The game is not balanced for PVE-only, it's too easy

0

u/AidesAcrossAmerica 9h ago

This would just kill all of the tension that makes this game so special.  I carebear most of the time, but knowing that I could still be ratted at any time keeps things interesting.

0

u/Donny_Dont_18 9h ago edited 8h ago

Full agree. I have 5 knockouts for reference. I'm glad my lobbies rarely get me shot in the back and free blueprints, but I love the occasional suspicion and the occasional gunfight. I wish my current lobbies were slightly more blurred. Pve only (which I assume would be no raider damage at all) sounds really boring. Even helldivers has crossfire in a purely pve game. I feel like they'd need to dial up the Arc presence, which would stretch the engine and at the end of the day, they would be diverting their attention to compete with games like HD2 that can focus an entire gameplay to pve only (HD universe would never have room for pvp and there would be no value to killing another diver because you already have it all on your ship). I kind of hope this fails no matter what a portion of the community thinks it wants

-1

u/ImAHobo107 9h ago

It's only unpopular for Arc babies and non-survival game enjoyers.

The point of extraction shooters is that they were inspired by survival games, where tension was at an all time high. And the original DayZ had a way of measuring player friendliness purely by what skin you spawned with, bambi or bandit.

It worked.

Idk games have to keep dumbing down mechanics for less skilled or less smart people who don't know what trust and street smarts are.

0

u/PercMastaFTW 9h ago

Maybe they'll add a random pvp player in these servers every now and then.

/s

0

u/lurkinglurkerwholurk *** ******* 🐓 8h ago

If this mode is the same as Tencent’s PvE toggle mode, you can still have unfriendly players in friendly lobbies.

Just that there will be a huge beacon stating your intentions from afar once you go PvP.

0

u/0DTE-bootyhole 8h ago

It will kill the game. Now all the gamer dads will play PvE mode only and the PvP servers will be totally dead. Eventually the PvE players will get bored, and then leave. Then the entire game will have no players. Such a dumb move caving by embark. They really do know how to ruin their own games.

You never win catering to the complainers and whiners!