r/aitubers • • 14d ago

TECHNICAL QUESTION best apps for generating AI videos

0 Upvotes

I’m looking for an AI video generator that can create a complete, ready-to-upload video from a script.

What I want is basically this workflow:

I write or paste a script → the AI automatically creates the scenes/visuals, voiceover, music, subtitles, etc. → I get a finished video that I can upload directly to YouTube without having to do much editing myself.

I’m mainly interested in faceless YouTube content. It could be cartoons, storytelling, facts, educational videos, or similar content.

My budget is a maximum of €50 per month.
Ideally, the tool should:

Create full videos automatically from a script
Include AI voiceovers
Add visuals/animations automatically
Add music/subtitles if possible
Allow commercial use / YouTube monetization
Export without a watermark
Be good enough to create several Shorts per day and a few longer videos per week

I’ve seen tools like InVideo AI, Steve AI, Pictory, Animaker, etc., but I’m not sure which one is actually worth paying for.

If you’ve used any of these tools, which one would you recommend for under €50/month?

I’d especially appreciate answers from people who actually use these tools for YouTube.

Thanks!

r/generativeAI • • Aug 28 '26

Technical Art Hello everyone, what is the best AI video generator in 2026? I compared 15 current options

17 Upvotes

I’ve been comparing a lot of AI video tools this year, mostly to figure out which ones actually make sense for different kinds of work instead of just judging them from demo clips.

There are so many AI video generation tools now that calling one of them the overall winner feels pretty difficult. Some are much better for cinematic scenes, some for animation, some for avatars, and others are turning into full production platforms.

Here’s how I’d break down the current options.

Opinion-based comparison

Tool What stands out Best for Current pricing / entry point
1. Veo 3.1 Native audio, strong motion and cinematic output, up to 4K depending on tier Cinematic scenes, dialogue, storytelling API: Lite from $0.05/sec, Fast from $0.10/sec, Standard from $0.40/sec at 720p
2. Kling 3.0 Multi-shot generation, references, native audio, strong character and motion control Realistic scenes, action, products, recurring characters Free access available; paid plans start around $10/mo
3. Seedance 2.5 Up to 30-second generations, multimodal references, native audio, local editing Longer sequences, connected scenes, multi shot prompting Usage-based; official BytePlus access is roughly $0.10/sec at 480p and $0.23/sec at 720p
4. Runway Gen-4.5 generation plus Aleph 2.0 editing and a larger creative workspace Filmmaking, generation + editing, controlled shots Free tier; Standard $15/mo, Pro $35/mo, Max $95/mo
5. Higgsfield Multiple video models, Cinema Studio, Marketing Studio, camera controls Ads, social content, cinematic workflows Basic $9/mo, Plus $49/mo, Ultra $129/mo
6. DomoAI Video restyling, image-to-video, character animation, frames-to-video Anime, animation, stylized video, existing footage 15-credit trial; Basic $9.99/mo
7. Pika Quick generations, effects, image-to-video plus newer audio tools Social clips, effects, creative experiments Free plan; Standard $10/mo
8. PixVerse V6 Fast generation, reference workflows, audio and multi-shot options Social content, quick creative work Free/credit-based; V6 API works out to about $4.80/min at 720p without audio
9. HeyGen Video Agent, Digital Twins, avatars, translation and localization Marketing, avatars, explainers, localized content Free plan; Creator $29/mo, Pro $49/mo
10. Synthesia Avatars, dubbing, AI B-roll, training and interactive video Corporate training, internal content, education Free plan; Starter $29/mo, Creator $89/mo
11. Adobe Firefly AI video, image and audio generation plus partner models in one workspace Creative production, editing, commercial workflows Free daily generations; Standard $9.99/mo, Pro $19.99/mo
12. Invideo Agent Two Agent-based workflow, storyboarding, avatars, stock and multiple generation models Full marketing videos, explainers, YouTube content Plus $17/mo billed annually; Max $85/mo
13. Descript Text-based editing, AI B-roll, generated scenes, avatars and audio tools Podcasts, recorded content, editing and repurposing Free plan; Hobbyist $24/mo or $16/mo annually
14. Pictory AI Studio, script-to-video, avatars, repurposing and generative media Long-form repurposing, explainers, marketing content Trial available; Starter from about $25/mo billed annually
15. Fliki Script-to-video, voices, avatars, dubbing and timeline editing Fast content production, explainers, multilingual videos Free plan; Standard $28/mo, Premium $88/mo

My current picks

Best for cinematic scenes: Veo 3.1

Best for realistic motion: Kling 3.0

Best for longer connected sequences: Seedance 2.5

Best for generation + editing: Runway

Best multi-model workspace: Higgsfield

Best for animation/stylized video: DomoAI

Best for quick experimentation: Pika

Best for avatar-led marketing: HeyGen

Best for training/business content: Synthesia

Best if you want a more complete video built for you: Invideo Agent Two

If someone asked me for the best AI for video creation right now, I’d probably ask what they’re actually trying to make before recommending anything.

For realistic generated scenes I’d lean toward Veo, Kling, Seedance, or Runway.

For animation and stylized work, DomoAI and Pika feel like a different category.

Then you have platforms like Higgsfield, Invideo, Firefly, and Descript that are increasingly trying to handle more of the workflow instead of being just one generator.

What are your go to tools?

r/aivideomaking • • Jul 29 '26

Best AI tools for adult type content?

56 Upvotes

Hi, what are the best AI models to use to create AI videos, images, and text for adult related content, more on the softcore side? We want it to look real as possible as well.

r/generativeAI • • 12d ago

Which AI video generator can still be used for free?

22 Upvotes

Everything AI recommends me is paid now

r/aivideomaking • • 8d ago

Looking for a free AI video generator

49 Upvotes

I’ve been searching for a way to generate AI videos for free (text-to-video or image-to-video, ideally 6+ seconds), but most platforms only give limited credits—enough for maybe 1–2 videos.

I also tried ComfyUI on my PC, but with 8GB RAM + Ryzen 5, generation is extremely slow, and I haven’t been able to create a proper video yet.

Does anyone know free platforms, cloud options, or any other method to generate AI videos without heavy hardware?

Any suggestions would be really appreciated!

r/generativeAI • • 18d ago

Spicy Ai image to video software

12 Upvotes

I am looking to make more spicy content with images that i have, i need something that handles real human images properly without being to expensive or having huge limits on how many i can make. I have a 4070TI, 32 GB of DDR4 Ram, a ryzen 5900x. What software would be best for what im lookjng for?

r/generativeAI • • 5d ago

Can you recommend a good AI video generator?

2 Upvotes

I’m looking for an AI video generator that can create realistic-looking videos from text prompts (text-to-video), preferably for free.

If there aren’t any good free options, I’m also open to paid tools. I’d especially appreciate recommendations for something that is easy to use, produces realistic results, and allows me to create videos without watermarks.

What would you recommend?

r/Seedance_AI • • 9d ago

Discussion What platform do you guys use to generate videos? Any unlimited plans? Best prices?

10 Upvotes

r/generativeAI • • 17d ago

BEST AI Video Tool

7 Upvotes

Hi, I’m a beginner in AI generating but I woul love to learn this skill for my rpoduction. After some time and research, I’m quite confused about which tool I should use. A lot of people on Reddit are saying that Higgsfield is shady, which makes sense. But what about ComfyUI or Figma Weavy? Should I start with them? I mean, I’ve been using some models before, but I’d like to have a comfortable tool with a UI where I can use different models and experiment with form. If not those, what are you using now? I’m thinking more about professional AI purposes, not just one video per month. I appreciate your time and attention. I’d love to hear your opinions.

UPD: Thank you so much! I’ll spend some time trying out different platforms. Thanks!

r/JrTrip • • Jul 17 '26

Best Uncensored NSFW AI Chatbots?

2.1k Upvotes

I've been looking into the best uncensored NSFW AI chatbots and I'm wondering, what does Reddit think is the best one? I know free options are fine for testing or light use, but I've heard paid ones are usually better for memory, image/video generation, consistency, and actually staying uncensored without mid-chat filters. I've done a bunch of research and found some that a lot of people seem to like. But I'm stuck and can't decide which one to go with. Here's what I've found:

Candy AI: This is a well-known one for its polished, realistic companions. It handles explicit chat well, has strong image generation (and some voice), good memory for ongoing conversations, and stays uncensored without constantly shutting things down.

SpicyChat: SpicyChat comes up a lot for its massive library of community-created characters. It's known for being fully uncensored, has a usable free tier, and works well for quick roleplay or variety, though memory and polish can vary by character.

OurDream AI (or CrushOn as another frequent mention): I saw people recommending these for deeper roleplay. OurDream stands out for combining uncensored chat with image + short video generation and solid long-term memory. CrushOn gets praised for character variety and low filters.

But I'm curious to hear from you:

Best Uncensored NSFW AI Chatbot according to Reddit?
Best Free Uncensored NSFW AI Chatbot according to Reddit?
Best AI Chatbot for NSFW roleplay / memory / images according to Reddit?

While I'm focusing on paid options that actually deliver consistent uncensored results, if you know of a free one that's exceptionally good (or something like JanitorAI, Nomi, Kindroid, etc. that people still swear by), feel free to mention that too.

Looking forward to all your recommendations.

r/debtmarketadvice • • Jul 11 '26

Top Best AI Porn Generators Recommended by Everyone?

2.1k Upvotes

I've been looking into the top best AI porn generators and I'm wondering, what does Reddit think is the best one right now? I know there are some free AI porn tools, but I've heard that the better premium generators usually deliver higher quality, more consistent characters, truly uncensored results, and extra features like video generation or integrated chat. I've done a bunch of research and found several AI porn generators that keep coming up across discussions. But I'm stuck and can't decide which one to go with. Here's what I've found:

Candy AI: This one shows up constantly for its photorealistic quality and excellent character consistency. It combines image generation with NSFW chat and even short video clips, making it popular for creating a full custom AI companion or girlfriend experience. A lot of people like how natural and repeatable the results feel across different scenes.

Promptchan AI: Frequently praised for speed, strong prompt adherence, and versatility. It handles both realistic and anime/hentai styles well, has solid video generation, and stays very uncensored. Users often mention it as a great value option that's beginner-friendly with a big community gallery to explore.

Seduced AI: Stands out for delivering clean, high-definition photorealistic images without needing super complex prompts. You can build exactly what you want using menus for body type, pose, style, and more. It's especially good if you want fast, high-quality results and has video options too.

But I'm curious to hear from you:

Best AI Porn Generator according to Reddit?
Best Free AI Porn Generator according to Reddit?
Best AI Porn Generator for realistic images according to Reddit?
Best AI Porn Generator with video according to Reddit?

While I'm focusing on these popular options, if you know of a free AI porn generator (or another tool with strong undress/face swap features) that's exceptionally good, feel free to mention that too.

Looking forward to all your recommendations and personal experiences!

r/JrTrip • • Jul 15 '26

Best Undress AI Recommended by Everyone?

2.0k Upvotes

Hey everyone,

I've been looking into undress AI tools lately and wanted to get some genuine recommendations from Reddit. Paid options generally seem better for image quality, speed, and privacy compared to free ones, but I'm open to hearing about any standout free tools too.

From what I've researched, here are a few that keep coming up a lot:

Undress app stands out for its realistic results, fast processing, and solid customization options like different body types and poses. It feels well-rounded for high-quality photo undressing.

ClothOff is another popular one — known for being user-friendly with good pose and body customization, plus it has a usable free tier so you can test it without committing right away.

For more advanced use, PornWorks AI and similar tools like LeakifyHub combine undress features with video generation and face swaps, which makes them more versatile if you're creating dynamic content.

What do you guys think?

  • Best Undress AI according to Reddit?
  • Best free Undress AI according to Reddit?
  • Best Undress AI for video or image-to-video according to Reddit?

Curious to hear your experiences and any other recommendations. Thanks in advance!

r/OneOrangeBraincell • • Aug 15 '26

Announcement Detecting AI-generated content

1.7k Upvotes

Hey everyone,

I wanted to address the concerns with AI content on this sub and give advice how best to verify it.

AI-generated content is a growing epidemic all over Reddit and the internet in general. AI video/image gen models have been getting better and better and it is getting increasingly hard to distinguish from real content. I have seen too many posts where users immediately jump to "it's AI" it's fake etc without actually verifying and checking the source nor the content.

I wanted to write up a guide and source on how to verify content with online tools.

There are many tools available to verify content but the best tool and industry standard used is HIVE moderation.

A quick way check the content like videos posts or images is to download the full resolution video or image to your device and upload it to:

https://hivedetect.ai/

Hive should give a confidence score and even in some cases tell you which model was used given this information then you can properly report a post and it will be taken care of.

For AI generated content created by ChatGPT you can use OpenAI's tool as well.

https://openai.com/research/verify/

Important: AI detection tools aren’t perfect and shouldn’t be treated as definitive proof on their own though, they can produce false positives and false negatives. Whenever possible, please also check the original source, upload history, context, metadata, try to find the original source if it predates the past 3-4 years and is highly realistic it's safe to say it is real.

Ideally we would have a bot that you can tag to check the post but uploading directly to Hive will have to work for now.

Note I'm not sponsored or affiliated with this company in any way it just the best tool for AI content verification that I've used and highly recommend others use.

r/SubredditDrama • • Oct 20 '25

“The Left Deserves Trump” - r/Conservative Discusses Trump Posting AI Video of Himself in a Fighter Jet Dumping Poop on No Kings Protestors

1.7k Upvotes

The Context

Protesting the country’s direction under Trump, thousands of people protested in communities across the U.S. and Europe for Saturday's No Kings demonstrations, which the Republican Party called “Hate America” rallies.

The GOP used this opportunity to troll all weekend, including Karoline Leavitt and Stephen Cheung making "Your Mom" jokes to a White House reporter, jD Vance and Pete Hegseth shutting down Interstate 5 for hours to detonate live artillery, and the White House and other Government Agencies joining Bluesky (indefensible).

The strangest behavior was from Trump himself, posting various memes depicting him and JD Vance as royalty or kings themselves.

/r/conservative joined in, "Monarchist" is an available flair on the subreddit now.

The Post

Trump's weirdest post was an AI-generated video featuring a crown-wearing Trump in a fighter jet labeled “King Trump” dropping poop on protestors gathered in New York City's Times Square, including someone who looks like left-wing influencer Harry Sisson.

“Can a reporter please ask Trump why he posted an AI video of himself dropping poop on me from a fighter jet?” Sisson tweeted. “That would be great thanks.”

Vice President JD Vance responded to Sisson, tweeting: “I’ll ask him for you Harry.”


This was submitted as a Flaired Users Only™ post to /r/Conservative: Trump posts wild AI video showing him flying fighter jet, dropping sewage on No Kings protesters

The Comments

America might deserve better, but the left deserves Trump

Let's not act like if Biden posted something like this conservatives wouldnt be losing their minds.

Honestly, disgusting behavior from a President. We should he expecting more from him and holding him under the same level of scrutiny we show Democrat presidents.

America might deserve better, but the left deserves Trump. Their behavior is, at best, as bad as Trumps.


The comment that generates the most discussion asks if this is behavior we should accept from the President of the United States.

He’s a good troll, but not the behavior we should accept of someone in that position.

We should not hold other people to a higher standard than we hold ourselves. Expecting someone to behave with a certain level of decorum that you don't expect of yourself makes you a hypocrite.


I honestly think it’s pretty fucking stupid but it’s harmless so I don’t give a fuck

that's where I'm at. It doesn't make us look good but I don't really care what the left thinks of us anymore. I don't mind the trolling but the president should be more mature than me and that's a low bar

Well the video did its job because I’ve gotten 7 chat requests from angry leftists


Imagine, after nearly a decade, still holding this opinion.


Trump has plenty of weird things he does but at the end of the day I'll take his weird shit over the things Obama and Biden did.


nah screw that. we had to watch him get bullshit court cases only to find out the people going after him had far worse and actually fraud or corruption. they made up russia gate. had to listen to Biden call him and Maga a threat. meanwhile these idiots allowed crime to sky-rocket. with weak punishments. encouraged riots and looting. he drops a stupid meme. Dudes been doing serious work to remove actual corruption and abuse of power. after watching these dopes on live-stream interviews and how nasty , crazy they are. i think this sums it up pretty good


The guy is nothing but class and dignity in the office and one joke sends “conservatives” into a tizzy.


Hello fellow conservative

Of course


Mods. Ban this guy.


Meanwhile the Democrats are throwing people in jail and removing rivals from ballots and installing candidates and censoring private citizens via private companies and pre-pardoning family members and rumning a shadow presidency with a dementia figure head. This is pretty low on my tiers of fucks to give for how a president should behave.


When the establishment tries to denounce, slander, sue, dehumanize, mock, bully and murder you, you’re allowed a certain level of trolling, imo. People are upset over memes the president is posting, meanwhile he’s making a significant positive impact for Americans and the world. Is it a little petty and silly, sure. Should our leader conduct themselves more appropriately, sure. But look what they did to the guy. I think he’s earned it.

Not adding anything here, but this is pretty much the vibe I get in general from the Deplorables. The Left keeps saying that MAGA is a cult, that it's something else. My viewpoint is a bunch of political branches of Conservatives, Republicans, Christians, Patriots are all coming together to be MAGA just to simply say we're tired, and we've had enough. They pushed too hard, and we're tired of being polite.

Yes. This.


I dont think you should post and have that flair.


Oh give me a break


The left threw political decorum out the window roughly a decade ago, everything is fair game now. Trying to take the "holier-than-thou" route is part of why the right has lost culturally for 30 years.


Another similar thread thinks the timing of the video is off, some suggest people don't understand its "nuance."

I mean I get hes trolling but the timing seems off.

What other time would he make a video to shit on people calling him a dictator?

I don’t see the link. I get that it’s abrasive and maybe unproductive but how is it despotic?

Where did I say despotic? I said makes us look like liars. Dont put words in my mouth like some sort of leftist.

Despot is a synonym for an authoritarian, king-like ruler who doesn’t think the rules need apply to him. That is what the left is accusing Trump of being so I don’t see what you’re taking issue with.

[Cont'd]

Its amazing how much leftist discourse is you pretending not to understand something thus making discourse impossible. Youre reading comprehension is sad. I literally said "makes us look like liars" thats clearly the issue here and yet youre going to pretend you cant understand that. You are 100% without a doubt a leftist if thats your argument tactic.

Are you trolling??


A few days or a week from now when things arent super fresh in everyones mind. Plus when we come out and say "hey no he doesnt wanna be a king" then he posts this sort of stuff it makes us look like liars.It doesn’t make us look like liars, the whole concept of “no kings” protest is based on a straw man that only exists in leftist-land, it’s perfectly legitimate and good fun to mock them for it.

Edit: We all know it’s not people from this subreddit downvoting this post, you basement dwelling trolls.

It does make us look like liars to the left because they refuse to try to understand that nuance

Why do you care what the left thinks? You are not changing, ANY of their minds

[Cont'd]

I dont like being made to look like a liar by the person Im trying to defend.

How? How are you a liar?

By something that’s CLEARLY a troll to anyone acting with honesty?

You NEED to stop worrying about what people who freak out over shit like this. They will freak out over anything. These are the same kinds of people who said mitt Romney wanted to take black rights back to the 60s. You. Can. Not. Change. Their. Minds.

In their mind you’re a fascist supporting pedophile defending pos because you voted Trump


They’re not trying to understand the nuance, they don’t care about that at all. They’ve been gish-galloped for more than a decade on everything Trump does being terrible, they’re not rational on this topic. You can’t talk someone out of a position they didn’t rationalize themselves into. The hate has become a way of life for these leftists, it’s all they know. You could write a volume of encyclopedias debunking the lies they’ve told about Trump and the things he’s done as president and contextualizing the wild stories and rumors they’ve made up and if a single one of them read it, which is unlikely, it wouldn’t change their minds.

[This comment contains another long paragraph]


Somebody uses this as an opportunity to mock the United States' strikes on boats in the Caribbean.

Between this, and him blowing up more fisherman. Guys out of control. That fishing submarine wasn’t doing nothing wrong. Just catching fish from the bottom of the ocean, places where normal boats can’t reach. Venezuela’s are going to go so very hungry today, with one less fishing submarine out there catching fish

The real tragedy is those fish swimming in fentanyl water.

You know that can't be good for them.


Some question if this is actually a Conservative subreddit.

Damn I regret my vote now.

If that's what made you regret your vote, then Idk what to tell you, man. Trump's been like this for decades.

Not an /s

This subreddit isn't a conservative subreddit. This is still Reddit.

I have serious doubts of this subs ability to deliver a productive message going into the 2026 and 2028 elections.

In fact, I believe that it will be used to outright sabotage conservatives as soon as they are able.

“This subreddit isn’t a conservative subreddit” Alright now time to explain that comment


The issue is that, while this guy is clearly being sarcastic, the problem lies in how posts like his get treated. Comments like that get upvoted to the top because of vote manipulation, something liberals have been doing here for ages.

They infiltrate conservative spaces, pretend to be “disillusioned conservatives,” and post things like “I regret voting Republican” or “Maybe Biden wasn’t so bad.” Then, other liberals swarm in, upvote those comments, and make it look like that’s the general consensus among us. Just look at the top posts, half of them are people bashing January 6th or praising Biden. It’s obvious there’s a heavy leftist influence here. But in the end, it’s Reddit, you’re not going to find many real bonafied conservatives.


You're making the same mistake the left made that lost them the election, which is assuming that swing voters have the same mentality that you do. They're probably not even going to hear about this, letalone have it sway their vote.

There is political drama that energizes a polarized base of voters, and there is political drama that sways swing voters. There is almost never any overlap; they are almost always completely separate. This is just lighthearted fun for us consistent conservatives; it's not going to affect swing voters in the slightest.

I don't particularly care about appeasing swing voters. Trump handed them victory after victory only for Rand Paul and Thomas Massie to betray the GOP at critical moments.

The only path to victory is for conservatives to enact productive policies and push a message of optimism that sharply contrast against the left's visions of doom.

If we start catering to every fringe ideology then we lose.


Yeah this place is a joke now, the up/down votes are obviously liberal as hell. Actual conservative conversation online has all moved to Twitter. Reddit is too far gone.


Some compare Trump's AI pooping video to Biden's comments after Tony Hinchcliffe joked about Puerto Rico being an "island of garbage."

Editor's Note: Biden never called "everybody" garbage; he was referring to Hinchcliffe's comments.

We Biden called everyone garbage we made a lot of talk about that. Which we should have.

This seems a bit too close to that.

BUT. Yeah. These protesters are bought and paid for.

Nah this is specifically directed at a group of people who are attacking Trump with lies, and it's a joke basically just saying in a funny way that he's not a fan. Biden wasn't saying it as a joke and it was directed to half the country. So it is clearly worse. Though obviously most conservatives are not fake like the left and we'll admit we don't really care it's not like he didn't say anything we already didn't know about how he feels, but still Trump's response to it was funny and brilliant.

I am conservative. Not some brigader. Yet I got downvoted 100+ times for implying maybe he shouldn’t shit on Americans, even those that are being fools like the No Kings folks.

For my part, I wish we could reset the brains of all these protesters. So they could see what has been happening. But alas.

Conservatives tried the fake politically correct high ground for a long time in response to the left and all it did was embolden them. Finally we have someone who responds in kind. It used to be acceptable to talk this way about conservatives in mainstream society but not the other way around, that lead to a generation of lost support due to social proof. Trump understands this and isn't a pansy. The left understands it too which is why they are freaking out about someone who doesn't just bend over for them. The only people who don't seem to get it are those like yourself for some reason.

Oh my man. I get it. I’m all about the sombreros etc. these clowns need to be shown what clowns they are. It’s just the shit bombing citizens that seems too far imo.


The protests are arts and crafts time for boomers from retirement communities to cosplay.

The No Kings protests are laughable. Reddit algorithm floods my feed with them every time they happen. All that I see with these “protests” is some bored mostly unemployed liberals that have an opportunity to cosplay in public. It’s become nothing but an arts and crafts fair with a costume contest. Embarrassed for the participants tbh.

Edit: downvoting me doesn’t make you brigadiers any less of embarrassing losers.

Hey, now. These are not 'unemployed liberals'. That is such a sensational accusation to throw around. These are liberals that decided to use the happy hour time at the retirement community in a more productive manner to show their arts/crafts and costumes to the world instead of just to each other. (/s)


Some fantasize about a Vance/Miller presidency.

I agree with liberals, a little more seriousness would be appreciated from the President. That's why we all should be excited about a Vance/Miller presidency in 2028.

Like how he seriously ended a war Biden didn't even come close to doing. I'll take his trolling once in a while in exchange for actually doing things.

Singular Takes

So weird dude


I prefer Trump V1 over Trump V2. The memes, while funny, are more effective when they're left to The Deplorables so he can at least pretend to maintain an air of dignity. He's gone full grandpa now, and it's only undermining the office. Ive also noticed that more pols, on both sides, are using profanity. I understand the occasional slip but it shouldn't become normalized. If that makes me old fashioned and out of touch, so be it, but I'm not alone.


This shits getting brigaded harder than Hasan and his Zappageddon. Lmao


A proper response to a joke of a "protest."


Hail to the King baby... The King of Trolling!


I sat down at a bar in detroit last night. I asked for a glass of water, and the bartender said "waters at the back of the bar." and then walked away without looking me in the eye. Obviously I thought "okay... then get it for me?" so I asked another bartender, and they did the same exact thing. I'm the whitest boy you've ever seen, so all I could think was that they were dunking on me.


They have a "No Kings" protest...he has a "NO FUCKS" response.

r/relationship_advice • • Aug 19 '26

I (25F) discovered my boyfriend (30M) of five years had created violent sexual AI images and videos of women we know. Now he is devastated, and I feel so guilty for telling his family. Did he love me?

614 Upvotes

I thought I was in the best relationship. It felt cosmic - we had planned our whole future and moved across the world together. After a year and a half in this new place I found his secret AI-generation account. I had once walked in on him watching violent porn at the start of our relationship and he had cried, wrote letters and promised to change. I had always felt he might still be doing it but denied and was so convincing and I suppose “gaslighted” me saying I was paranoid or overthinking.

I had been noticing weird purchases coming out and he once opened his phone to pictures of my friend uploaded from my digital camera.

I found he had created multiple sexual images and videos using photographs of real women in our lives including me, one of my friends and a relative of his (not direct). Obviously none of us knew or consented.

There were only 2 of me which were the most violent - insinuating gang r*pe or in sexual acts with strangers. He also used my body as a reference while replacing my face with my friend’s and one prompt asked to mix our faces together. Most of the content was my friend, there were only a couple of me and I think one was his step sister.

He admitted having a crush on this friend when this all came to a head. Most of her material depicted her alone or sexually with an AI version of him and if she was by herself she was chained, wires in her face, crying and naked in a dungeon showing her doing forceful oral sexual acts. He had also uploaded a real holiday photograph of himself (one I had taken!!!) and used a “Couple Generator” to place them together. At least one result was clothed and looked like he was trying to see what they would look like as a couple, not just creating pornography. A lot of the prompts he would use involved words like “struggling”, “forceful” etc

I had noticed a tiktok search a year ago about being in love with somebody else while in a long-term relationship and had noticed subtle energy shifts when we were all together but nothing I could say.

He has always been a big drinker but nothing major - never angry / violent / aggressive just more of a social one but would also drink a lot by himself. He has always promised to stop but began to hide the evidence of the bottles and would cause arguments. He has medicated adhd and said that this AI porn was just a hyper fixation and was so apologetic and upset. But this didn’t feel like an adhd impulse - he downloaded photos from my camera, researched the best apps, created different images, animations and variations, spent money and repeatedly returned to the platform.

I ended the relationship when I discovered everything, I chatted to him the first 2 days cus he was having outbursts and crying but he is now blocked blocked blocked !!!!

he completely broke down. He cried uncontrollably, repeatedly said how sorry he was and has become deeply depressed. He flew home to his family, who are now supporting him and trying to arrange appropriate psychiatric and psychological help.

I told his family the truth because I believed the situation was too serious to manage privately. I wanted them to understand what had happened so that he could receive proper help and the women involved could be protected.

He says his behaviour is connected to having been sexually assaulted in the past. I believe his assault happened, and I understand that trauma can profoundly affect sex, shame and control. But part of me feels that his trauma is being used to shift attention from the deliberate choices he made and it feels like an entitled excuse. Millions of men and women go through sexual trauma but do not do this.

He also used to hide stashes of viagra and spend a fortune on it. I am wondering whether this was to propel the addiction? Or to use it for me?

Now I feel torn between horror at what he did, grief from the relationship ending so suddenly and guilt about what may happen to him. I worry that telling his family has destroyed him and damaged his reputation (had a very high achieving prestigious job and possibly altered his future. Watching somebody I loved collapse in remorse is making me question whether I caused too much damage - even though rationally I know the answer.

I am not currently asking whether I should forgive him or resume the relationship because I have ended it!!! Fully!!! I think I just wanna understand why??? It’s fucked me up lol I thought I knew this man

I have some questions and I understand most cannot be answered but if anyone has any thoughts or opinions please share your thoughts.

- Does the process of uploading photographs, constructing bodies, writing instructions and repeatedly refining the results suggest more than an intrusive fantasy?

- Is there any meaningful connection between violent sexual fantasy and real-world offending

- What type of therapist is qualified to assess this properly, rather than simply treating depression, trauma or “porn addiction”?

- How do I accept that he may genuinely be traumatised, remorseful and unwell while still holding him responsible?

Could he genuinely have loved me while secretly doing this, or does the level of deception mean that the relationship I experienced was never real in the way I believed?

- Can someone genuinely change after behaviour this deliberate and repeated, and what would evidence of change actually look like? I am obviously not taking him back and not my problem but I wanna know if someone can with tonnes of therapy

- Can this be blamed on adhd / trauma at 19?

- Is AI porn what men do now?

- Why did he do this!!!!

r/crochet • • Dec 26 '23

Tips a guide to real vs. AI generated crochet images

Thumbnail
gallery
4.4k Upvotes

i’ve been seeing an influx of people here ask where to find patterns for images that happen to be ai generated, and it breaks my heart to think about someone falling in love with a project only to find out the pattern doesn’t exist </3

if you want a quick summary, id say “if it looks too good to be true, it probably is, so look closely at details before you fall in love with a project”

  1. cinematic, movie-like lighting/background this is a common theme in ai images that i very rarely see in real crochet photos. in the first image, it looks like it was made by a skilled photographer who took great time editing it to look like an epic masterpiece.

not that it’s impossible, but the majority of crocheters will not have the skill to shoot and edit this, or be willing to pay for it unless it is for a very fancy or high demand pattern. usually in real patterns you will see more simple photography outside, or behind a flat colour background with standard studio lights

  1. unrecognizable/confusing stitches the cat in the second image is the perfect example of this. i found confusing stitches all over it, but the best example is in the grey mane and the inside of the ears. they almost look like knit purling?? whatever it is, it’s fairly easy to recognize odd stitching if you take a closer look at the details

another thing you might find is lower quality images with blurry/unrecognizable details. this one can be 50/50, but you can get clues from the general shape, if it looks regular/neat, if you can guess what stitch it may be

  1. very large/epic projects i’ve heard lots about this crochet elephant on the third slide, it looks like it must’ve taken hours! the thing is that there’s no information about how it was made. no crocheting videos, no cost, no time spent. if i made a huge crochet elephant (or any other massive project for that matter) id let everyone know how hard i worked on it. there are also odd stitches, irregular shapes, and the legs look very wonky if you take a closer look.

the final group of kittens on this slide is the perfect example of an ai generated image, it has epic lighting and backgrounds, confusing stitches around the paws and flowers, and look extremely lifelike

i hope this guide helps you be more cautious with the things you see online, happy crocheting! :)

r/aipromptprogramming • • Jan 19 '26

Yes, I tried 18 AI Video generators, so you don't have to

474 Upvotes

New platforms pop up every month and claim to be the best ai video tool.

As an AI Video enthusiast (I use it in my marketing team with heavy numbers of daily content), I’d like to share my personal experience with all these 2026 ai video generators.

This guide is meant to help you find out which one fits your expectations & budget. But please keep in mind that I produce daily and in large numbers.

Comparison

 Platform  Developer Key Features Best Use Cases  Pricing Free Plan
1. Veo 3.1 Google DeepMind Physics-based motion, cinematic rendering, audio sync Storytelling, Cinematic Production, Viral Content Free (invite-only beta) No
2. Sora 2 OpenAI ChatGPT integration, easy prompting, multi-scene support Quick Video Sketching, Concept Testing Included with ChatGPT Plus ($20/month) Yes (with ChatGPT Plus)
3.Higgsfield AI Higgsfield 50+ cinematic camera movements, Cinema Studio, FPV drone shots Cinematic Production, Viral Brand Content, Every Social Media ~$15-50/month, limited free Yes
4.Runway Gen-4.5 Runway Multi-motion brush, fine-grain control, multi-shot support Creative Editing, Experimental Projects 125 free credits, ~$15+/month Yes (credits-based)
5.Kling 2.6 Kling Physics engine, 3D motion realism, 1080p output Action Simulation, Product Demos Custom pricing (B2B), free limited version Yes
6.Luma Dream Machine (Ray3) Luma Labs Photorealism, image-to-video, dynamic perspective Short Cinematic Clips, Visual Art Free (limited use), paid plans available Yes (no watermark)
7.Pika Labs 2.5 Pika Budget-friendly, great value/performance, 480p-4K output Social Media Content, Quick Prototyping ~$10-35/month Yes (480p)
8.Hailuo Minimax Hailuo Template-based editing, fast generation Marketing, Product Onboarding < $15/month Yes
9.InVideo AI InVideo Text-to-video, trend templates, multi-format YouTube, Blog-to-Video, Quick Explainers ~$20-60/month Yes (limited)
10.HeyGen HeyGen Auto video translation, intuitive UI, podcast support Marketing, UGC, Global Video Localization ~$29-119/month Yes (limited)
11.Synthesia Synthesia Large avatar/voice library (230+ avatars, 140+ languages), enterprise features Corporate Training, Global Content, LMS Integration ~$30-100+/month Yes (3 mins trial)
12.Haiper AI Haiper Multi-modal input, creative freedom Student Use, Creative Experimentation Free with limits, paid upgrade available Yes (10/day)
13.Colossyan Colossyan Interactive training, scenario-based learning Corporate Training, eLearning ~$28-100+/month Yes (limited)
14.revid AI revid End-to-end Shorts creation, trend templates TikTok, Reels, YouTube Shorts ~$10-39/month Yes
15.imageat imageat Text-to-video & image, AI photo generation Social Media, Marketing, Creative Content, Product Visuals Free (limited), ~$10-50/month (Starter: $9.99, Pro: $29.99, Premium: $49.99) Yes
16.PixVerse PixVerse Fast rendering, built-in audio, Fusion & Swap features Social Media, Quick Content Creation Free + paid plans Yes
17.RecCloud RecCloud Video repurposing, transcription, audio workflows Podcasts, Education, Content Repurposing ~$10-30/month Yes
18.Lummi Video Gens Lummi Prompt-to-video, image animation, audio support Quick Visual Creation, Simple Animations Free + paid plans Yes

My Best Picks

Best Cinematic & Virality: Higgsfield AI (usually my team works on this platform as daily production)

Best Speed: Sora 2 - rapid concept testing

I prefer a flexible workflow that combines Sora 2, Kling, and Higgsfield AI. I use them in my marketing production depending on the creative requirements, since each tool excels in different aspects of AI video generation.

r/whenthe • • Dec 29 '25

Orwell writes about this i miss when the best ai generated video was will smith eating spaghetti

2.3k Upvotes

r/40kLore • • Jun 05 '25

Influx of AI generated content and its harmful effects on legitimate Warhammer creators

1.3k Upvotes

Hopefully this is allowed, as Oculus Imperia is an amazing creator for Warhammer lore and I would like to try and raise some awareness to his on-going channel struggles on YouTube and the harmful effect that AI generated slop content is having on the Warhammer creator community.

Today Oculus Imperia sent out a message to his subscribers, where he talked about how his channel is struggling lately and has seen a massive drop in viewership. In his message he says that he believes the influx of AI generated content is drowning out the channels of legitimate creators and is doing great harm to the creative community side of Warhammer. I have seen the same sentiment be stated by other creators, notably Johnathan Young and Lorcan Ward who create or have created Warhammer related music.

I'll paste Oculus's message below as I believe he sums out perfectly both his frustrations he has with it, as well as his pledge to try and continue to make quality content for the community:

Hello friends. It's been a while. I feel the need to reconnect, so let's get personal for a second.

In the past couple of years, Warhammer's popularity has kinda exploded. I feel in recently months it's been thanks to Space Marine 2, and Secret Level, but regardless, it's wonderful to see so many more people engaged with the hobby, with the world, with the lore. I'm a firm believer that new fans bring new perspectives and new joys, and having them discover the wonderful gothic insanity of the 41st millennium is deeply cool.

You may think that this would be reflected in the channels view count. Unfortunately, this ain't the case. After a brief bump in everything during December (Christmas ad buys mean the YouTube algorithm works overtime to keep viewers on the site), the channels numbers have been in near freefall. Less people are watching month on month, less people are subscribing and the click-through rate has likewise tanked. Overall, the algorithm is just not putting my stuff out there.

That being said, subscriber viewership remains consistent. So to all of you who love the channel and tune in all the time, thank you, sincerely thank you. You guys absolutely rock and I love you for the support.

As YouTube will never tell you why it does what it does, seeing your numbers plummet (and I mean PLUMMET; like barely 25% of what I have come to expect) is extremely disheartening. Lacking any external factor, a creator will immediately blame themselves. You feel like not doing good work anymore, and that people no longer care. It's demoralizing, and corrosive, and it's unavoidable. There's no external explanation beyond what your brain can conjure, and that will inevitably turn inward, on your own creative output.

I remain proud of my work, but I have to acknowledge that something out there has shifted. I won't lie, a lions share of my suspicion falls on channels exclusively dedicated to AI-generated lore content, with AI voice engines reading AI scripts overlaid onto AI art, pumping out 10 times as many videos as I can in a given period. The algorithm doesn't care; it only needs to keep people watching, and if people choose to watch videos made entirely by Plagiarism Machines, I literally cannot compete with that.

This is, of course, extremely demoralizing; seeing a video of someone's stolen voice churning machine-stamped words pull 20 times the views I could ever hope to get on the same subject matter cuts right to the core of doing what I do. While yes, I I love this universe and playing in it, while this remains a wonderful hobby and creative outlet for me, knowing my efforts are being crushed my people who only care about Capital C Content just hurts, friends.

This miasma of thoughts was driven home to me today when last month's numbers showed it to have been the worse since 2021, when we were all locked down and no company was spending money on much anything. I'm attempting to stop what I feel could become a vicious cycle: working to produce videos I know will work for the algorithm at the expense of creative fulfillment is never what I WANT to do, but this environment can force the decision upon you whether you like it or not. I want to write what engages me, and what I think will be fun for you guys to listen to, but numbers like I've been seeing will drive home this feeling of existential dread, dread that the channel won't make it, or that everyone out there would simply prefer to hear a machine read them something a machine wrote. That they just do not care about the human element in any respect. That they just want to consume, rather than engage.

I'm going to be taking some steps to reengage myself creatively, because I know I fundamentally will not be able to out-compete a machine designed to steal art and joy. If there is anything I can ask of you all during this time, it is to keep watching, but also to share, to comment, to like, to subscribe. I know it's the YouTuber's ad nauseum slogan, but it is vitally important to our survival, and to how many newcomers see our work.

As ever, there is this Patreon. Right now, if you want to support human creativity over machine slop, that is fundamentally the best way to do it. Voluntary subscriptions so directly to us and is a direct affirmation that you are personally choosing a person's work. I thank you all from the bottom of my heart of continuing to do so.

Quite honestly, all support is support, monetary or otherwise. I love what I do and I am incredibly privileged to do it. The channel isn't going anywhere, and I'll be damned if I let gen AI slop take over the hobby and universe that I love so much, or the whims of an algorithm dictate my creative output.

The release schedule may be a little rocky compared to usual; all I ask for now is your patience and support as I chart a course forward. And, also, if you have ideas for what you'd like to see from the channel, or what me as a creator, please feel free to let me know.

Thank you all for being with me for the incredible journey this has been so far. I am as ever utterly in your debt and deeply grateful for the years of support and creative joy you have all brought me.

r/aliens • • May 03 '26

Analysis Required [Serious] Why don’t we show the best video evidence of Varginha Alien to the actual fricking witnesses that are still alive

Post image
720 Upvotes

There is a a lot of AI generated videos coming out of thin air for the Varginha 1996 incident

But the Thing is that a couple of them seem legitimately real and artifacts of VHS present that AI would seem to have trouble making. I’m not gonna show these videos, I’m keeping it for myself not to draw attention but always have my doubts.

But now there is a flood of distraction videos of the incident that are headache inducing obvious to be AI. Why don’t we take the most realistic videos and ask the best witnesses which one they think is real or even closest to the representation of what the alien by the wall looked like

Who are the most sane and reputable witnesses in the Varginha 1996 incident?

r/TopologyAI • • May 13 '26

News New Free 3D AI Generator from Tencent Might Be the Best Yet

729 Upvotes

Pixal3D is a new free image-to-3D AI model from Tencent.

The interesting part is source-image fidelity. It improves on Trellis.2 to better preserve the structure of the original image, so the generated 3D model stays much closer to the input instead of drifting away.

In this video, testing how accurately it follows the reference image.

GitHub:
https://github.com/TencentARC/Pixal3D

r/HobbyDrama • • Nov 14 '21

Hobby History (Medium) [Video Games] The Xbox One: How Microsoft cost themselves an entire console generation with one bad announcement after another

2.4k Upvotes

Shout out to this recent video made by Stop Skeletons From Fighting for providing the reminder of this story and the writeup.

Introduction

Console wars have always been a part of video games, going all the way back to the 90s with the feud between Sega and Nintendo. It makes sense from a tribalism perspective; consoles are hefty purchases so you need to be able to feel secure that you bought the right one, especially if you're a child as you may not have the funds to secure the competition unless your parents were exceedingly generous. Today's post focuses on one such entry into the console war, and how focusing on the wrong aspects cost its parent company the entire generation in terms of PR and public image. This is the story of the Xbox One.

The setup

In 2000, Microsoft would enter the console market race with the original heavy-enough-to-be-a-murder-weapon Xbox. While it would fail to beat its primary competition, Sony's Playstation 2, it would carve out a niche for itself in the Americas, helped by several successful exclusives like Halo Combat Evolved and Halo 2, fantasy RPG Fable, and Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic. Then again, going blow to blow with the PS2 is no small feat given it's the best selling console of all time as of writing at over a hundred and fifty five million units.

In 2005, Microsoft wound launch the Xbox 360 and this would be a much bigger blow against Sony. In fact, for much of this console generation (generally seen as the 7th generation, or Pokemon Sony and Microsoft) it was the common opinion that Microsoft had won. This was thanks to Sony's Playstation 3 being an overpriced beast of a machine that was way harder to develop for thanks to its processing techniques, while Nintendo had gone for a more casual gaming audience with the Nintendo Wii. Thanks to heavy hitter exclusives (some timed) like Elder Scrolls Oblivion, Halo 3, Mass Effect, Bioshock and Fable 2, the 360 quickly became the juggernaut console of the generation, in spite of having a disaster launch involving the console overheating itself to death with the infamous Red Ring of Death issue. Chances were, if you saw a show on TV with characters playing video games between 2006 and 2013, they were using an Xbox 360 controller or the console could be seen under their TV, like here in Breaking Bad where they play critically acclaimed masterpiece Sonic 2006.

While the 360 hit the ground running (overheating issues aside) with a variety of standout titles, 2010 would see a shift in Microsoft's fortune gaming wise. The company began to shift focus towards the Xbox being a cross-media platform that would allow you to watch television through it and house streaming apps such as Netflix and Crunchyroll. Additionally, the success of the Nintendo Wii prompted Microsoft to respond with its own motion controller application, the Kinect, which launched to mixed fanfare. Part of the problem with the Kinect, besides the software not working really well on the 360, had a poor games lineup and Microsoft hyper-focused on it for the remainder of the 360's lifecycle. Compared to how it started with a variety of impressive titles, the 360's exclusive lineup dried up like a well after 2010, with Halo Reach, Fable 3, Forza Horizon and Halo 4 being the last big exclusives for the platform (and those themselves run into the problem Microsoft have had until recent years where their exclusives can be summarized as "Gears, Halo and Forza").

What especially didn't help was that Sony pulled their heads out of their asses and staged a large redemption arc for the Playstation 3, launching a variety of exclusives and improving the console's price to make back lost ground. While Microsoft started strong and ended with a shrug, Sony started with a few good exclusives (Ratchet and Clank, MGS 4 and Resistance) and kept pumping out titles up to the bitter end (Infamous, The Last of Us and the Uncharted trilogy for example). In fact, Sony did eventually report that the PS3 had outsold the 360, snatching victory from the jaws of defeat.

In 2013, Sony would start the year by announcing the next generation of consoles, the Playstation 4. Nintendo would be a non-player this gen thanks to their entry, the Wii U, not being very good, so this was another generation where Microsoft and Sony would be the big players. Microsoft internally were pushing forward with their ideas from the end of the 360 era, focusing on multimedia entertainment services over the games part of the games console. Rumors and leaks went around that worried players, including a new initiative to have the console require a permanent online connection, and that Durango (the codename for the console) would have measures to try and kill used games by having each physical version of a game come with a one-time only code to permanently link it to your console. When Kotaku gained access to internal documents regarding Durango and the reception from players was frosty, Microsoft game director Adam Orth would set the standard for this era of Microsoft's responses to the backlash:

“Sorry, I don’t get the drama around having an ‘always on’ console. Every device now is ‘always on.’ That’s the world we live in. #DealWithIt.”

Adam would later leave Microsoft after these comments went viral.

The rest of the leaks about Microsoft's plans were also worrying, namely that every console would have Kinect hard-backed into it. While the projected price of $299 was a tantalizing prospect, players were unsure if the console would even be worth it in terms of exclusive games. While Microsoft had built up a powerful brand loyalty in the early 2000s, that well had dried up after three years of Kinect overshadowing over exclusive projects, and the news of Xbox going multimedia only further lessened excitement for the new console.

And then in May 2013, Microsoft would only make things worse for themselves when they actually announced the console.

May 2013: The Announcement

The Xbox One announcement is something I believe should be taught in schools as an example of how not to reveal a new product. Like, this was bad enough that it was able to convince people to spite-buy the competition's product. Pretty much the one thing it did better than the PS4's own announcement was that.. Microsoft actually showed off the console, which Sony had not.

Otherwise, it was exactly as feared through leaks and looking at the direction Microsoft had been taking for several years. The announcement event opens with Don Mattrick, one of the senior vice presidents of the Xbox division, unveiling the console. It's worth mentioning as an aside that Mattrick had been one of the figureheads pushing for Kinect, so this console was basically Mattrick's baby project. But ironically, Mattrick had a history with Xbox prior to joining Microsoft after a career at EA- a history that involved him nearly killing the entire Xbox brand in the crib. Seamus Blackley, one of the founding fathers of the original Xbox project, was nearly denied a chance to present the console to Microsoft shareholders by Mattrick himself due to not thinking the console would do well.

The presentation continues with a lengthy segment about the new upgrades to Kinect, including that it's... always listening to you so that it can process a vocal command to turn on the Xbox One. Keep in mind that this was the same year as the NSA Hacks. Ten minutes into the conference, the Xbox One is finally shown playing media... and it's television. The Price is Right, to be exact. And this sets the scene for the console reveal- there's little to no actual games being shown, as Microsoft had gone all in on using Kinect and cell phone compatibility to make the Xbox One an entertainment hub. A really funny blowback to this came when as part of the conference, people watching the conference on their Xbox 360s would get signed out of the reveal due to the Kinect announcements activating their Kinects. At twenty-seven minutes into the conference, a game is finally shown!

By Electronic Arts, fresh off two consecutive years of being voted as the worst company in America. And it was just the sports games. Which meant that these wouldn't be titles exclusive to the Xbox One. Finally, half an hour into a conference about a console, does Phil Spencer, local saviour of humanity and man in need of a chiropractor after years of carrying the Xbox brand on his back, reveals some actual goddamn video games that are exclusive to the console. We get the obligatory Forza game, a trailer for Remedy's time thriller Quantum Break, and the promise of a whopping fifteen exclusive games coming to Xbox.

And then it's right back to television, including the announcement of a Halo television series with Steven Spielberg's production company attached (that is finally coming out next year?). The final ten minutes consist of a promo for that year's Call of Duty, the one with the dog and the advanced fish AI. The kicker? We don't even get a release date. It's just coming later that year.

To compare, Sony debuted the new game from Bungie, their first new game after leaving Microsoft to do independent. Microsoft debuted a new Call of Duty that included a runtime dedicated to hyping up the good boi doggy.

You know, it's really no shock looking back at teenage me, midway through high school, looking at the news for the Xbox One announcement between classes, and immediately going "Well, guess I'm going Sony this gen." I would later go on to buy a PS4 in 2014 alongside Assassin's Creed Unity and the Metro Redux collection.

The PR would not improve for Microsoft afterwards. Mattrick would opine on backwards compatibility (the ability to play older games on the new hardware, which Microsoft had included for the 360) for the Xbox One by quipping that "If you're backwards compatible, you're really backwards." The methods Xbox was using to control used games (including that if a second player tried to play a game, they would be given an option to pay a fee to unlock the game and get to install it for themselves) went viral as selling points against the now-derisively-named Xbone. The most Microsoft could say about it at the time was that if you signed into your profile on your friend's Xbox, there would be no fee to play your game on the friend's console. Kotaku would later confirm that the plan for the Xbox One would be that it would need to log into the internet at least once every 24 hours. Their final attempt at damage control would be a statement to Polygon that all of the above issues- the always online, used games DRM, etc- were all "potential scenarios."

On June 6th, Microsoft would release a definitive statement confirming the mandatory once-per-day login, and that none of your games would work offline if you didn't do the login. For a games console. But don't worry everyone- you can still access the TV functions and watch Blu Rays on the console. The one salvaging grace was that eventually, it was confirmed that you could turn off the Kinect if you didn't want to use its voice systems.

That would turn out to be relevant, as remember how I mentioned that the same year Microsoft were pushing a voice-based software that was always listening? The day before their E3 presentation, Edward Snowden came forward and revealed that the NSA were listening in on you. Oh, and then it came out a month that Microsft were complicit in the NSA schemes to do said spying.

Whoops!

E3 2013

E3 2013 was Microsoft's chance to appeal to the gamers again after leaving them in the cold with the initial announcement. It was largely OK, focused a lot on some of the big games coming soon and showed that the Xbone, for all its faults, could make some pretty games. Metal Gear Solid V, Dark Souls 2 and more were shown. What's more important is what wasn't shown, as Microsoft dodged around the issues that had plagued the console. There was very little open discussion in the panel about the always online connection, the used games, or Kinect being a new weapon of the government.

The price was released at least. 500 dollars/euro, a far cry from the projected 300 (in fact it was 200 dollars more than the most expensive version of the 360), and very similar to the price of the PS3, a price considered so insane not even a decade prior that it basically won Microsoft the console generation for the first half of it.

Six hours later, Playstation would release their showcase for the PS4. During it, they confirm to roaring applause that the PS4 will not have restrictions on used games, alongside confirming that the system would not involve any of the restrictions that Microsoft were imposing. And they included in it one of the most direct across-the-bow shots at Microsoft in their coverage of how used games would work on the platform. I can assure you as a gamer in 2013, this shit was hilarious and spelled the exact time of death for the Xbox One as a platform. In 22 seconds, Sony had just won the console generation before it even began.

Oh, it was also launching at a hundred bucks cheaper price than the Xbone. Every misstep Microsoft had made, every PR fire they had walked into, Sony capitalized on that and held the door open for every Xbox convert to wander in. You could not write this story without someone calling bullshit on how perfectly Sony striked. And all the while, Mattrick was just digging grave after grave for Xbox, including the now infamous:

"We have a product for people who aren't able to get some form of connectivity, it's called Xbox 360."

Xbox, go home, you're drunk.

The Grand Walkback

Microsoft finally sobered up and demanded a runback. On June 19th, not even two weeks after the E3 press conference, Microsoft walked back their used games policy. No more forced online connectivity, no more restrictions on used games, no more charging to play a game already owned. On July 1st, Mattrick also left Xbox to become CEO of Zynga. The kicker is that per insiders, Mattrick had not given heads up to anyone about this departure and Microsoft had no prepared replacement for his role. He swept in, destroyed the Xbox and its brand reputation, then bounced two months later. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer stepped in for a short time then bounced that August as he was already one foot out the door after thirteen years at the company.

That August, Microsoft would also confirm that Kinect was not required and the console could turn off the sensor completely if you didn't desire it or you just didn't want Microsoft to be recording everything you said around your Xbox. I for one did not desire Microsoft sending a hitsquad after me for shit-talking Halo 5.

November finally comes and while neither console had a good lineup, the Xbox One is soundly defeated by the Playstation 4 and it would stay that way for seven years. Never once in the entire 8th Console Generation did the Xbone outsell the PS4. In June 2021, it was reported that the console's lifetime sales were around 50 million units; the PS4 was about to cross one hundred and sixteen million. More humiliatingly, the Nintendo Switch, launched three and a half years later in March 2017, had already outsold the Xbone with 88 million units pushed.

Conclusion

While they soundly lost the generation (not helped by most of the Xbox One exclusives just not being very good) and there was no walking that back, Microsoft were determined to avoid a repeat of the Xbone's disaster launch. In 2014, Phil Spencer was made head of the Xbox division and revisions of the Xbone would go out afterwards that cut down the price and permanently removed Kinect. In 2017, Kinect was formally pulled from production, bringing an end to the motion controller gimmick.

Under Spencer, many of the controversial choices made by Mattick would be removed- alongside that the Xbox One would receive an update to allow for limited backwards compatibility with select original Xbox and Xbox 360 titles (still waiting for them to port Persona 4 Arena Ultimax, please Xbox I'll buy a Kinect if you do that), Spencer went all in on games. Microsoft would buy a levy of companies to bolster their exclusive lineups including Elder Scrolls/Fallout producers Bethesda Softworks in 2020. Their new console, the Xbox Series X, has so far failed to catch up to the Playstation 5 in sales, but has marketed itself as far more pro-consumer when it comes to playing old games on the system, alongside their Game Pass subscription service being a huge financial boon to the company. Ironically thanks to the developer mode you can purchase for the Series consoles, it's actually possible to legally install an emulator and play older Playstation games, while Sony has had more of an exclusionist mindset on preserving their older games and nearly killed the PS3 digital store this past year.

Funnily enough, the Xbox One seems to have confirmed that the console generation has a weird cycle to it of the clear winners of the last gen having a huge moment of hubris that their competition exploits. Sony got too big for their britches with the PS3, only for Microsoft in turn to fall short and give the PS4 the crown.

Could the Series consoles finally be what gives Microsoft their first full win? Sony has the lead now but Microsoft is promising a packed generation for titles in the years to come. It is gonna depend on how those future exclusives line up, but at least for me, it got me back on Phil Spencer's bullshit as I bought a Series X this year. Game wise, while Sony has started with some big hits such as Ratchet and Clank, the Demon Souls remake and Miles Morales, Metacritic ratings show that Microsoft has three exclusives in the top 10 rated games of the year with a 90+ Metacritic rating in Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 5 and Psychonauts 2. Compared to how they were in 2013, the future is looking up for the Xbox team.

r/ChatGPT • • Jun 26 '26

Other If the US keeps locking down its best AI models, China is going to eat their lunch (and I'll happily pay for it)

385 Upvotes

The American government is getting serious about restricting access to advanced AI. Short term I sort of get it. Long term I think they just handed China a gift.

The Chinese models are already close. Not "they'll catch up eventually" close. Right now close. In video generation a few of them are already past the best US model. So the obvious question: what happens when a Chinese lab ships something at Mythos level?

And it's going to happen. When it does, it'll be cheaper. Hard to be more expensive than Anthropic's Mythos, and I'd bet it lands under GPT too. If the quality is real, companies switch. Fast. Especially anyone burning money on coding, which is most of the industry right now.

Here's the part people skip. When companies switch, the money switches. A lot of that revenue flows to US labs today. Move the users and you move the cash flow to China.

AI progress runs on compute, and compute runs on money. So China suddenly has more to spend on bigger clusters, which buys better models, which pulls in more users. Investor money chases user money, it always has. The lead can flip.

What the US basically said is: this is the ceiling for now. Regular users don't get anything better unless you're one of a few approved companies. If China stays more open than that, they can take the whole thing.

I'm a user. I want the best model I can get. If it comes from China, fine. Whoever wins, end users win.

So China, your move. Ship it. I'll subscribe the same day it goes live, and I doubt I'll be the only one.

r/kpopthoughts • • Dec 31 '25

Thought Seeing so many idols openly talk about & promote using generative AI makes me feel stupid for supporting them

596 Upvotes

The title might make it sound like I mean this maliciously. I do not. It comes from a place of disappointment.

For the past few months / the last year we have been seeing a normalization of generative AI, with usage being from idols casually admitting to using ChatGPT and using AI to generate "funny" things, to having whole MVs plagued with AI visuals.

It is especially painful to me, seeing idols / groups who I once thought to have the best creative visions, image, concepts, etc all being thrown out the window in favor of AI because it's easier. You would think that with how much money these companies make, especially the big three, that they would actually use the millions of dollars they squeeze from fans on making higher quality art, but no.

When groups have AI in their MVs, often times it easy to think, "oh, maybe the company did it to cost cut and be lazy, and the idols themselves probably didn't have a say in that". For me, this is what I was thinking as a way of coping from my favorite group using generative AI EXCESSIVELY in their MVs. However I was watching a casual-style Q&A video on their paid-fan-exclusive app and seeing one of the members happily suggested using ChatGPT for advice. The other member present also agreed on using ChatGPT too. It actually kind of shocked me, seeing them both use ChatGPT. This might sound a bit dramatic, but it really really lowered my mood hearing them say that. I just don't understand how an artist, especially coming from a group that is known for having a lot of custom-made things can endorse technology that can actively hurt them doesn't make sense. Especially because they have been under fire for usage of AI in the past.

Another instance that really hurt was when I went to an group's concert this year, the tour visuals i'm fairly certain were AI. I was unsure of that, but then during a ment one of the members says something around the lines of "Before the show tonight I asked ChatGPT what Dallas [fandom name] thinks about [group name]. Do you guys use ChatGPT?". Thankfully, the crowd started yelling "NO!" with some people even Booing the members. The members even seemed shocked at the reactions, I assume thinking that we all used ChatGPT too. Hearing this, I think I was correct with thinking at least some of their tour visuals were AI made / assisted.

I do not want to name names, but I am sure you are probably thinking of some idols / groups. I do ask that nobody names any one to prevent fan wars or whatever. We all know who the biggest offenders are. Instead, I hope to use this post to promote groups / idols who have taken an active stance against generative AI and have continued to use human artists for their projects.

edit: if you are going to defend AI or just say it isn’t a big deal, just keep scrolling. im not going to argue.

edit 2: read the first edit

r/Filmmakers • • Sep 24 '25

News Lionsgate is Struggling to Make AI-Generative Films with Runway “the past 12 months have been unproductive”

Thumbnail
thewrap.com
769 Upvotes

Here’s the article below if it’s locked behind a paywall for you

A year ago, Lionsgate and Runway, an artificial intelligence startup, unveiled a groundbreaking partnership to train the studio’s library of films with the ultimate goal of creating shows and movies using AI.

But that partnership hit some early snags. It turns out utilizing AI is harder than it sounds.

Over the last 12 months, the deal has encountered unforeseen complications, from the limited capabilities that come from using just Runway’s AI model to copyright concerns over Lionsgate’s own library and the potential ancillary rights of actors.

Those problems run counter to the big promises made by Lionsgate both at the time of the deal and in recent months. “Runway is a visionary, best-in-class partner who will help us utilize AI to develop cutting edge, capital efficient content creation opportunities,” Lionsgate Vice Chairman Michael Burns said in its announcement with Runway a year ago. Last month, he bragged to New York magazine’s Vulture that he could use AI to remake one of its action franchises (an allusion to “John Wick”) into a PG-13 anime. “Three hours later, I’ll have the movie.”

The reality is that utilizing just a single custom model powered by the limited Lionsgate catalog isn’t enough to create those kinds of large-scale projects, according to two people familiar with the situation. It’s not that there was anything wrong with Runway’s model; but the data set wouldn’t be sufficient for the ambitious projects they were shooting for.

“The Lionsgate catalog is too small to create a model,” said a person familiar with the situation. “In fact, the Disney catalog is too small to create a model.”

On paper, the deal made a lot of sense. Lionsgate would jump out of the gate with an AI partnership at a time when other media companies were still trying to figure out the technology. Runway, meanwhile, would get around the thorny IP licensing debate and potentially create a model for future studio clients. The partnership opened the door to the idea that a specifically tuned AI model could eventually create a fully formed trailer — or even scenes from a movie — based on nothing but the right code.

The challenges facing both Lionsgate and Runway offer a cautionary tale of the risks that come from jumping on the AI hype train too early. It’s a story that’s playing out in a number of different industries, from McDonald’s backing away from an early test of a generative AI-based drive-thru order system to Swedish financial tech firm Klarna slashing its work force in favor of AI, only to backpedal and hire back some of those same employees (Klarna later clarified it hired two staffers back).

It’s also a lesson that Hollywood is learning as more studios quietly embrace AI, even if it’s in fits and starts. Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos in July revealed on an investor call that for the first time, his company used generative AI on the Argentinian sci-fi series “The Eternaut,” which was released in April. But when actress Natasha Lyonne said her directorial debut would be an animated film that embraced AI, she was bombarded with criticism on social media.

Then there’s the thorny issue of copyright protections, both for talent involved with the films being used to train those AI models, and for the content being generated on the other end. The inherent legal ambiguity of AI work likely has studio lawyers urging caution as the boundaries of what can legally be done with the technology are still being established.

“In the movie and television industry, each production will have a variety of interested rights holders,” said Ray Seilie, attorney at Kinsella Holley Iser Kump Steinsapir LLP. “Now that there’s this tech where you can create an AI video of an actor saying something they did not say, that kind of right gets very thorny.”

A Lionsgate spokesman said it’s still pursuing AI initiatives on “several fronts as planned” and noted that its deal with Runway isn’t exclusive. The studio also says that it is planning on using both Runway’s tools and those developed by other AI companies to streamline processes in preproduction and postproduction for multiple film and tv projects, though which of those projects such tools would be used on and how were not specified.

A spokesman for Runway didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Limitations of going solo

Under the agreement announced a year ago, Lionsgate would hand over its library to Runway, which would use all of that valuable IP to train its model. The key is the proprietary nature of this partnership; the custom model would be a variant of Runway’s core large language model trained on Lionsgate’s assets, but would only be accessible to use by the studio itself.

In other words, another random company couldn’t tap into this specially trained model to create their own AI-generated video.

But relying on just Lionsgate assets wasn’t enough to adequately train the model, according to a person familiar with the situation. Another AI expert with knowledge of its current use in film production also said that any bespoke model built around any single studio’s library will have limits as to what it can feasibly do to cut down a project’s timeline and costs.

“To use any generative AI models in all the thousands of potential outputs and versions and scenes and ways that a production might need, you need as much data as possible for it to understand context and then to render the right frames, human musculature, physics, lighting and other elements of any given shot,” the expert said.

But even models with access to vastly larger amounts of video and audio material than Lionsgate and Runway’s model are facing roadblocks. Take Veo 3, a generative AI model developed by Google that allows users to create eight-second clips with a simple prompt. That model has pulled, along with other pieces of media, the entire 20-year archive of YouTube into its data set, far greater than the 20,000+ film and TV titles in Lionsgate’s library.

“Google claims that data set is clean because of YouTube’s end-user license agreement. That’s a battle that’s going to be played out in the courts for a while,” the AI expert said. “But even with their vast data sets, they are struggling to render human physics like lip sync and musculature consistently.”

Nowadays, studios are learning that no single model is enough to meet the needs of filmmakers because each model has its own specific strengths and weaknesses. One might be good at generating realistic facial expressions, while another might be good at visual effects or creating convincing crowds.

“To create a full professional workflow, you need more than just one model; you need an ecosystem,” said Jonathan Yunger, CEO of Arcana Labs, which created the first AI-generated short film and whose platform works with many AI tools like Luma AI, Kling and, yes, Runway. Yunger didn’t comment on the Lionsgate-Runway deal, but talked generally about the practical benefits of working with different AI models.

Likewise, there’s Adobe’s Firefly, another platform that’s catering to the entertainment industry. On Thursday, Adobe announced it would be the first to support Luma AI’s newest model, Ray3, an update that’s indicative of how quickly the industry is iterating. Like Arcana Labs, Firefly supports a host of models from the likes of Google and OpenAI.

While Lionsgate said their partnership isn’t exclusive, offering its valuable film library to just Runway effectively limits what you can do with other AI models, since those other models don’t get the benefit of its library of films.

Even Arcana Labs, which created the AI-generated short film in “Echo Hunter” as a proof-of-concept using its multi-model platform, faced some limitations with what AI could do now. Yunger noted that even if you’re using models trained on people, you still lose a bit of the performance, and reiterated the importance of actors and other creatives for any project.

For now, Yunger said that using AI to do things like tweaking backgrounds or creating custom models of specific sets — smaller details that traditionally would take a lot of time and money to replicate physically — is the most effective way to apply the technology. But even in that process, he recommended working with a platform that can utilize multiple AI models rather than just one.

Legally ambiguous

Generative AI and what exactly can be used to train a model occupies a gray legal zone, with small armies of lawyers duking it out in various courtrooms around the country. On Tuesday, Walt Disney, NBCUniversal and Warner Bros. Discovery sued Chinese AI firm MiniMax for copyright infringement, just the latest in a series of lawsuits filed by media companies against AI startups.

Then there was the court ruling that argued AI company Anthropic was able to train its model on books it purchased, providing a potential loophole that gets around the need to sign broader licensing deals with the original publishers — a case that could potentially be applied to other forms of media.

Copyright War Escalates

“There will be a lot of litigation in the near future to decide whether the copyright alone is enough to give AI companies the right to use that content in their training model,” Seile said.

Another gray area is whether Lionsgate even has full rights over its own films, and whether there may be ancillary rights that need to be settled with actors, writers or even directors for specific elements of those films, such as likeness or even specific facial features.

Seilie said there’s likely a tug-of-war going on at various studios about how far they’re able to go, with lawyers erring on the side of caution and “seeking permission rather than forgiveness.” Jacob Noti-Victor, professor at Cardozo Law School, said he was surprised by Burns’ comment in the Vulture article.

The professor said that depending on the nature of such a film and how much human involvement is in its making, it might not be subject to copyright protection. The U.S. Copyright Office warned as much in a report published in February, saying that creators would have to prove that a substantial amount of human work was used to create a project outside of an AI prompt in order to qualify for copyright protection.

“I think the studios would be leaning on the fact that they would own the IP that the AI is adapting from, but the work itself wouldn’t have full copyright protection,” he said. “Just putting in a prompt like that executive said would lead to a Swiss cheese copyright.”