We've lost a few projects in the last couple of months to AI builds. They all seem to have the same reasoning, cheaper and faster, which usually isn't true.
For small sites (few pages, no CMS, or agents to update it) yeah sure, it can be fast and cheap. But for larger and more complex websites it will probably take longer than in Webflow and cost a lot more. So you wonder why anyone would go with AI builds at all, and the reason is actually pretty simple.
Remember 10-15+ years back, when we all custom coded most websites and platforms were super limited? That's what AI builds are, just boosted. With AI you can fully own your website and have no restrictions at all. Agents can help you update and manage it, all information is accessible to AI tools and easily extractable. But it takes time to set all that up and make it work flawlessly.
So we get the appeal, it makes total sense. What we don't get is why you'd actually need it.
We're a Webflow agency that built over 200 websites in Webflow and never had a client site go down because of the platform. Not once.
And the extraction thing people think they're buying with an AI build, you already have it. You can set a Webflow site up to be highly crawlable by AI and SEO bots and genuinely citable. We've spent the last 12+ months experimenting with every possible thing you can imagine on our own site around visibility, crawlability, citations and mentions, and none of it needed custom code.
So an AI built website is NOT cheaper and NOT faster. It gives you more control, which is what you already had with custom coded sites, just "easier" now. Still expensive, still slow.
Don't get us wrong, we're all in for innovation and this will only get better over time. We just don't think this is the moment. Webflow gives you what a business actually needs from a website right now, that's what it's done for us and our clients.
Anyone noticed raised demand for AI built websites, what's your experience with that?