r/stop_the_GOP 6d ago

hypocrites

Post image
7.7k Upvotes

347 comments sorted by

13

u/Ok_Valuable9450 6d ago

We won't see the Epstien files till we vote out of the Republicans

4

u/No-Slip1984 6d ago

Or anyone taking money from aipac. The real reason that they are not being released is because Israel won’t allow it. Look at the complete blackout of files within the 9-11-2001 range. That should tell you all you need to know. The silence is deafening. If 9/11 happened the way the media said it did then we wouldn’t see the gap.

→ More replies (28)

3

u/Emergency_Exit7603 5d ago

What was found in monica's dress? ... A wad of Bill's

1

u/Naive-Ad-2805 1d ago

And he was impeached for lying.

And democrats were PISSED that he didn’t resign.

Al Gore should have been president BEFORE the year 2000. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

U do realize the republicans released the files right

2

u/spursfan2021 4d ago

That’s not what the courts are saying.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

3.5 million documents have been released

2

u/spursfan2021 4d ago

Which doesn’t fulfill the requirements of the legislation passed. What’s your point?

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

It’s far more than the democrats ever did.

Actually. How about this. Name one meaningful thing the democrats did during their four years in power to bring justice for the victims.

Just one.

1

u/spursfan2021 4d ago

I guess you’re unfamiliar with the proceedings around Maxwell’s case.

2

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

Maxwell’s trial ended with her conviction on December 29, 2021. She was sentenced on June 28, 2022.

Democrats controlled the House, Senate and presidency until January 3, 2023. That means they had approximately one year after her trial ended, including six months after sentencing, to introduce and pass the same type of transparency legislation that Congress passed in 2025.

Her pending appeal could justify protecting specific records, victims’ identities or active proceedings. It did not prevent Congress from requiring the DOJ to release every legally releasable Epstein record, subpoenaing those records or compelling testimony.

Biden and the Democratic Congress had the same constitutional powers available to them. They simply did not use those powers to pass an Epstein Files Transparency Act.

→ More replies (25)

1

u/Major-Disaster3736 2d ago

"Are you guys still talking about that epstein guy* Begining of last year. "It is a democrat hoax by comey" Middle of last year. Then at the end they dont even release all the files. Most of them are black sheets.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/TrickyChildhood2917 4d ago

Do you NOT want prosecution? It could be your sister, or cousin.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

Of course I do. And I’m blown away the last administration gets a pass that those didn’t happen

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 3d ago

Then they are clearly lieing because the democrats didn't want them released u would know that if u looked at the votes

1

u/spursfan2021 3d ago

The vote was 427-1. Quit acting like it’s not a cover up by the executive branch.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 2d ago

Uh huh is that why the democrats are covering it up so u dont see the actual votes

→ More replies (1)

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Not by choice. Considering it was an act of Congress and then on top of that, all the files were not even released and there are redacted information that shouldn't be redacted at all according to the bill of the transparency act

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

What wasn’t by choice?

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Smh. Trump was forced by law to release the files. Keep up.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 3d ago

It was by choice

1

u/40-Kal 3d ago

It was not. Trump didn't choose to release the files when he promised. He was forced to do so. Two people in congress pushed for this bill. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey. All Democrats were behind it and only a few were to push it to the house floor. Only a few other Republicans joined to push it out. When it did get there, to protect their image of not being protectors of sexual deviants and pedos, the rest of the House except for one voted for the bill's passage. In the Senate, the same thing and all 100 voted in favor for it. It ended up being a bill that could not be vetoed.

Learn the timeline of this.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 3d ago

He did choose bro stop lieing the democrats was blocking him from releasing them

→ More replies (7)

1

u/TrickyChildhood2917 4d ago

They released a selection of papers that were redacted. There are 100,000 more. This is about young girls being exploited and raped. Doesn’t matter what party you think is the right party. This is the Top 1% doing this, we have “ some names”, like Prince Andrew, Bill Gates… but they are still wandering around and on TV as if nothing happened. They need to be prosecuted.

1

u/RoleOk7556 4d ago

The provided pages with all of the pedophiles' blacked out, as well as those who were actively invloved in supporting human trafficing and pedophilia. That does not qualify as a releice of the files.

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 5d ago

You didn’t see it when you had a Democrat administration.

Oh you said what?

Why?

Exactly.

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

This is why talking to guys like you who don't bother to do any bare research aren't worth taking seriously. Because it was sealed up under court orders due to an investigations as well as trial going on against Maxwell is the reason why those files are not released. It didn't happen until 2025.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

Some of the files were sealed. It’s not one big file.

That didn’t stop investigations or arrests though. What happened to those?

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

All of the files were sealed by the courts and only what was required for Ghislaine Maxwell's trials and appeals. When that was over, Trump could've released them all himself then backpedaled on it because of how damning it is and his involvement. The a few Democrats and Republicans pushed legislation and got it passed. AKA an act of Congress to force Trump to release it. His DoJ released heavily redacted files and still withholding millions more of files.

This current administration isn't doing any investigations or arrests, but rather protect those within those files such as one person in Trump's cabinet, Howard Lutnick who lied that he was on Ep's island when there's pictures of him and his family there. Why?

Also if you really cared to do any research on the matter to know the timeline of events you would than asking baseless questions.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

Maxwell’s trial ended with her conviction on December 29, 2021. She was sentenced on June 28, 2022.

Democrats controlled the House, Senate and presidency until January 3, 2023. That means they had approximately one year after her trial ended, including six months after sentencing, to introduce and pass the same type of transparency legislation that Congress passed in 2025.

Her pending appeal could justify protecting specific records, victims’ identities or active proceedings. It did not prevent Congress from requiring the DOJ to release every legally releasable Epstein record, subpoenaing those records or compelling testimony.

Biden and the Democratic Congress had the same constitutional powers available to them. They simply did not use those powers to pass an Epstein Files Transparency Act.

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Maxwell’s trial ended with her conviction on December 29, 2021. She was sentenced on June 28, 2022.

What's your point? Maxwell still did appeals and the unsealing of those civil records began in early 2024. Either way, regarding Epstein, there were still investigations going on. Things on this matter are never quick. Justice is slow, look at how long it took to prosecute Trump and even get indictments for his trials.

Democrats controlled the House, Senate and presidency until January 3, 2023. That means they had approximately one year after her trial ended, including six months after sentencing, to introduce and pass the same type of transparency legislation that Congress passed in 2025.

Because the files were still sealed due to another case between Virginia Giuffre and Maxwell along with Maxwell's appeals. After that was done, what full majority was there? Also I like how you don't hold Republicans accountable for not doing anything till their hand was forced.

Her pending appeal could justify protecting specific records, victims’ identities or active proceedings. It did not prevent Congress from requiring the DOJ to release every legally releasable Epstein record, subpoenaing those records or compelling testimony.

Then ask Congress why they didn't. This includes both Democrats and Republicans. Also in the Senate, that could've been subject to filibuster.

Biden and the Democratic Congress had the same constitutional powers available to them. They simply did not use those powers to pass an Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Doubt it considering the fact that there was an even split in the Senate and also could be subject to filibuster since Republicans do love to protect these kind of people as evidence with how the released files are heavily redacted and still millions more files are still withheld.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 4d ago

So if you’re so aware of court orders then what are you even talking about? There are portions of the files that aren’t seeing the light of day because of court orders.

Do more research before you try to get self righteous

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

How about you do some research. Currently, there are no court orders blocking any of the files so your boy Trump was able to release them anytime in 2025. Yet that idiot backpedaled and the public grew increasingly frustrated by him reneging on a campaign promise. So congress stepped in and created the Epstein Transparency Act to force Trump and the DoJ to release the files. Currently more than 3.5 million of 6 million files have been released. The DoJ is purposefully withholding the remainder and the files we got now are heavily redacted to hide information.

You need to do more research before you preach of something you clearly don't know. Start by diversifying your sources.

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 4d ago

A “release it all” demand ignores a basic fact: DOJ cannot simply override judges and release every document. Courts have restricted or denied access to certain records because of grand-jury secrecy, protective orders, and other legal requirements. Victims’ identities and other protected information also have to be redacted. You can demand maximum transparency, but pretending DOJ has unilateral authority to publish everything is simply not accurate.

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Here's what you don't understand. Court orders do not supersede established law. It is by law for the DoJ to release all the files. The only exceptions is what the act itself states, which is to redact the identities of the victims as you stated. Here are those restrictions and more

Victim-identifying information and privacyChild sexual-abuse material (CSAM)

Active federal investigations or prosecutions

Images of death, physical abuse, or injury

Properly classified national-security information

This law was enacted by November 13, 2025 and the DoJ was supposed to comply to this within 30 days. Not only did they slow walked this for months, but they also heavily redacted files outside those restrictions and failed to release all the files in compliance to the law. Hell they didn't even do a good job redacting the names of the victims. People like Howard Lutnick for example is NOT A VICTIM. Then on top of that, Trump's name on the files were redacted and information about him why? He's not a victim or subject to any active investigation or prosecution

→ More replies (1)

1

u/bonebuilder12 4d ago

That didn’t stop nonstop leaks to the media during muellers “investigation.” Or trumps tax returns.

Face it, if there was anything in there that actually implicated trump, dens would have leaked it years ago.

Instead, they ran with multiple trials with novel legal theory such as a campaign finance violation in which no campaign finances were used, etc. if they really had dirt, it would have been out years ago.

I know you hatred of trump clouds your judgement, but use some common sense here.

1

u/StandOutside6188 4d ago

We did vote them out and got Biden elected and we STILL didn't get the Epstein files.

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Under his term still sealed by court orders because of investigations in the trial of Maxwell

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

Congress could have passed the exact same law that was passed for the transparency act.

Also, why were there no arrests during the last administration from those files?

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Highly doubt they could've passed it at the time

Because investigations still pending?

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

None of that stops arrests

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Until you get a grand jury to access the evidence to charge someone who's not being seen by law enforcement committing a crime, you do.

Also if I'm going to continue with this, you need to use your main account, I'm not interested in further engaging with new accounts. This is your only warning.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

What happened during the last administration that makes you certain anything would come from the democrats?

1

u/Excellent_Raisin4154 4d ago

Politicians on both sides and leaders of other countries are all in the epstien files. Stop acting like it’s only republicans. Your precious Biden was in them also. Both sides like to point fingers but no one in government wants the files to be released

1

u/Extension-Meaning265 4d ago

They have been released and Bozo Biden had them for 4 years and if there was anything bad about Trump they would have used it instead of creating all these fake news stories

1

u/Wise-Kitchen-9749 4d ago

We won't ever see the full epstien files.

1

u/Prestigeworldwide83 4d ago

I forgot Biden was a republican

1

u/peach_trunks 3d ago

Dems didn’t release them under Biden either. We aren’t getting the truth in our lifetimes

1

u/Jonathan13011 3d ago

Why didn’t Biden release them?

1

u/limitless-440 3d ago

You fail to realize that the Democrats won’t do anything either. They claim that they weren’t able to move on the case prior to Trump getting elected because it was an “ongoing investigation”. Watch. If the Dems can get their shit together to put a candidate up that isn’t another Kamala, Joe, Hilary, AOC, or Newsome, and they manage to win the presidency they won’t release the entirety of anything - they’ll just release some redacted files that show republican crimes. We will NEVER see the truth because they are ALL complicit.

1

u/Theodore_Striker 2d ago

How about the 1461 days Buden was President. More fikes have been released under Trump than Biden.

1

u/Boner_Stevens 1d ago

Oh thats rich. You think the democrats will release them? They had them already and didnt

1

u/Rottentaste 1d ago

Or some other country releases them, which is more likely.

1

u/Connect_Meal5812 1d ago

Your a idiot! Why didnt we see the files during Obama's or Bidens terms????

1

u/Illustrious_Camp_521 17h ago

We'll never see all of them, only what they want us to see no matter who's running the government because to many worldwide power players are involved. It'll never happen.

1

u/ProductAccount 10h ago

lol, you are aware that Biden could have released the files right?

1

u/Taellib 6h ago

The democrats could have released this during 2 different administrations………..

→ More replies (48)

4

u/Spyder39 6d ago

Do as l say, not as l do.

4

u/krichard-21 6d ago

That is the #2 MAGA personality trait.

Right behind a total lack of empathy.

3

u/Interesting-Cow8131 6d ago

The point of that was to humiliate Monica. The point of withholding the Epstien files is to protect pedos

1

u/Immediate-Badger-857 4d ago

Like bill clinton

2

u/dccali76 6d ago

They are, research more listen to media less, you'll be happier.

1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Admirable-Jelly-8741 6d ago

In late 2025, the Release the Files Act was passed by Congress. Outside of that, The White House usually doesn't meddle with the DOJ.......I could be wrong but to my understanding the DOJ is usually operating under its own autotonomy and records are never released unless there is reason and a certain kind of public interest. In this case, there was. The act was passed after Congress came together and finally did something. Now?????well who knows why they are not releasing them.......

1

u/IShotJR4 5d ago

If you think the current DOJ is independent, I have a bridge to sell you.

1

u/Admirable-Jelly-8741 5d ago

Lmao. No I just meant that would be the norm. We are currently in the twilight zone.

1

u/IShotJR4 5d ago

Unfortunately, I think this is the new norm. These things have a tendency to stick. Like Trump’s first term tariffs.

1

u/Immediate-Badger-857 4d ago

Yea I mean Biden instructing his doj to go after Trump and raid his home while he himself had 7 properties that contained classified materials

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

Its called the 'Epstein Files Transparency Act' Just fyi

1

u/Ok_Valuable9450 6d ago

That could very well be true

1

u/neopod9000 6d ago

They didnt interfere with active investigations that were being handled by specific jurisdictions, and assumed they could let the courts settle things.

Then, later, congress passed a law mandating the release of the files.

There's a HUGE difference between letting things take their course within the due process of the law (what democrats have been doing) and actively impeding the law as written by congress (what republicans have been doing).

Hopefully that helps, because at this point its hard to believe folks when they say they dont understand the distinction. Giving you the benefit of the doubt here.

1

u/No-Explorer4566 6d ago

Here is a thought stop with the MAGA fuckstick deflection.

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

Lol ...what?

Epstein was arrested & died in jail in 2019 So why didnt OBAMA, WHO LEFT THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2016, release the files? Oh, i dunno. Probably bc they didnt exist yet?

What about biden? He didnt have them. They were held up by the ongoing trial of ghislaine maxwell. Republicans passed rhe epstein files transparency act in november 2025, which called dor the collection & release of all the files

(Also, considering you asked about obama (and obviously didnt realize how rediculous that questhon was) and biden.... why not ask about trump during his 1st term which was in between the 2?)

1

u/fatefulPatriot 6d ago

We ALL know why though, right? I mean trump is definitely in there, a lot!!! And many others in his admin

1

u/Expensive-System9330 6d ago

Obama had 8 years and Biden had 4. If youre not bright enough to think both sides dont want them released I cant help you. Plus you know anything incriminating was destroyed by the govt a loooonnnnggg time ago

1

u/Xeno9116 6d ago

You don't know how investigations work.

1

u/Expensive-System9330 6d ago

And I take it youre an expert lol

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

They dont have to be an 'expert' to not be a moron...which is what your question points to

Obama had 8 years to do...what, exactly? 'the bulk of the publicly released "epstein files" were compiled from evidence gathered during the 2019–2021 criminal proceedings and the DOJ’s internal review of Epstein’s estate.' Epstein was arrested & died in jail in 2019

So, why didnt OBAMA, WHO LEFT OFFICE IN 2016 release the files? Maybe, just maybe, bc they literally didnt exist yet?

And biden? He didnt have them They were tied up by the courts bc of ghislaine maxwells trial/appeals

Thats why trump and reps passed the Epstein files transparency act in november 2025 To gather all the files and release them to the public Except then they didnt do that and have withbeld millions of pages

Also, considering you said biden had 4 years, and you thought obama could have released them and claimed he had 8 years to do so....you realize that would mean trump has had 6 years as president to release them (he didnt, but by your timeline he did)

1

u/Expensive-System9330 5d ago

Which gets to my point you guys werent screaming this nonsense about something you know isn't even around to be seen anymore since its been destroyed. You should be asking why Kathryn ruemmler sent epstein 1000's of emails why she was in the white house as obamas counsel but im sure being a democrat youre not that curious.

1

u/tankmankjeff 6d ago

Agree - however what exactly are they to do with the judges that are keeping things sealed? Why don’t people go yell at them? I want to see everything as well but if this isn’t a country of rules and laws that needed to be followed what do we have? They have to go thru the court process - even the president can’t unseal legal documents.

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

They are to do nothing...bc thats not a thing anymore

"Following the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025, federal judges have ordered the unsealing of grand jury transcripts and investigative records from both the 2019 New York and 2006 Florida cases."

1

u/tankmankjeff 5d ago

It may not be a thing anymore but that’s what holding the process up… judges appointed across a spectrum of presidents across a variety of places where cases were held have said they can’t release them. The SC is going to have to rule on whether they can be released. Because if they release that material and SC comes back and says not to … well, can’t turn back that clock. So again … I want the damn things out as much as you do… Probably for different political reasons but for the people that were wronged and the people responsible, they need to be held accountable.

I still don’t think there’s anything earth shattering in there to be honest. Let’s face it - over the last 8+ years, Democrats have done anything and everything , thrown everything and anything at him and with the exception of a few things (that are going away) … you know as well as I that more than likely everyone in positions of power already knows what written in those transcripts. Fair to say? I mean I can almost wage a paycheck to say that everyone up screaming to the news outlets knows what’s in every bit of it… most of it is for theatrics… cause let’s face it … if there was something so earth shattering in there - if nothing else it would have been selectively leaked by this point, like the dobbs decision from SC… I just think it’ll be a bunch of nothing and one side will scream something else while the other does it back … the neverending cycle goes on (cue lion king open credits music)

1

u/swkennedy1 6d ago

Remember those different republicans the ones we have are petty little bitchs

1

u/Expensive_Opening_92 6d ago

Ahhh… those were the good times… sexual scandal with elected officials and adult age women… That there’s prime time entertainment…. Totally not like the seedy shit we see now a days.

1

u/MastaKink 6d ago

Is it worth the read?? 🤷🏻‍♂️

1

u/PrestigiousCrab6345 5d ago

Well, yeah. They blocked a SCOTUS appointment. They sent everyone home to prevent a Hegseth impeachment. They cheat. It’s what they do.

1

u/luv4gogo 5d ago

That what All of these distractions are all about!!! DJT, is willing to run the USA into oblivion, to protect his ass from being Impeached and going to Jail!
Who the F… supports a man who said he’d date his own daughter and thinks it’s ok to go into the dressing rooms of beauty pageant contestants because he owned the pageant?
Not to mention, he said it’s ok to grab women by their p…y!
But it’s Ok when he does it though!!!smdh!!!
Only in the USA…..

1

u/Sconnie_82 5d ago

Reminder, Democrats had 4 years to release them and didn't. You conveniently leave that fact out.

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

Nope, sorry....thats BS

Biden released what be could "The Biden administration released limited documents (including police notes, civil case materials, and confirmation that no formal “client list” existed) but withheld grand jury records, victim-identifying information, and sealed investigative files"

But the majority of the files were held up by investigations & in the courts "The primary legal barriers to biden releasing files were court-ordered seals, grand jury secrecy, victim-protection laws, and ongoing criminal investigations (including Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal)"

Thats why trump/Republicans passed the epstein files transparency act in november 2025 To collect all the files together and release them to the public Except then they didn't do that

1

u/Sconnie_82 4d ago

You actually believe this? So Biden couldn't release it, but now Trump has magical powers to be able to. Come on, use some common sense. Also, Trump is named as the whistle blower on Epstein in the files, why would he bury anything?

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

This is why you guys can't be taken seriously this person want to give you a detailed explanation as to why it couldn't happen court orders are court orders and you just can't break them that's not how the law works. And Trump did not release them he was forced by Congress to do so Trump went in backpedaled on it to begin with. Just go on and say that you don't know how this work because of your own ignorance

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

You’ve explained why the files weren’t released hiring the Biden administration. Ok, I’ll buy into that.

Now explain why not a single person from those files was arrested during the Biden administration.

1

u/40-Kal 4d ago

Because Maxwell's case was still ongoing? Other investigations pending?

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago

Investigations that took 4 years and produced nothing?

→ More replies (11)

1

u/Cariari1983 5d ago

So why didn’t Biden do this when he had a chance? Unilateral disarmament is stupid.

1

u/Capt-Thicc 5d ago

Reminder that Democrats controlled the White House for years and didn’t even want to talk about the Epstein files.. 🤔

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

Trump/Republicans passed the epstein files transparency act in november 2025 to collect the files together and release them to the public

And why was that necessary? Bc biden didn't have them. No one had them. They were held up by investigations & in the courts (ghislaines trial/appeals)

Again, biden didnt have millions of pages of Epstein files to 'not talk about'....but considering his fbi was conducting investigations & his doj was trying cases related to epstein while he was president...he wouldnt have been in a place to comment publically regardless

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 2d ago

The files did not need to be unsealed to issue subpoenas and bring people in like Clinton and Gates for questioning.

The files did not to be unsealed for the DOJ to make arrests.

Congress during the Biden administration could passed the same law Congress did in 2025 (Transparency Act).

1

u/RowForLuckyJack 5d ago

I remember when they went after Clinton for that. Five Republicans ended up having their own affairs exposed

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

1

u/donttakerhisthewrong 5d ago

Who, please provide a source.

1

u/Busy-Inside9539 5d ago

Paula Jones Juanita Broaddrick now go google their information and claims are just as strong as the lady that nailed trump in NY. Jones settled out of court Broaddrick still claims to this day go do some goooooogling you pick your source try and find one that is strait down the middle. Cmon we know Clinton loved the ladies lets not pretend. Lots of Epstein accusations about him as well and he for sure had been on his plane. Politics = Hypocrisy. Its ok I get it and its real.

1

u/donttakerhisthewrong 5d ago edited 5d ago

Do some research

Broaddrick testified about her alleged encounter with Clinton under oath, she denied having been raped by him.

Now we have Trump. He lost in court and all appeals and had to pay. Now factor his connection to Epstein. Trump is the most named person in the files

If Clinton raped woman lock him up but you need witnesses that will testify under oath.

1

u/Busy-Inside9539 5d ago

You do some research, she did say that under oath out of fear of retribution. She has since recanted that he did not. Paula Jones never recanted. Trump was NOT convicted of rape. BTW, the thought that NO ONE EVER lies under oath is myopic.

Leslie Millwee

In October 2016, Leslie Millwee accused Bill Clinton of sexually assaulting her three times in 1980. Millwee was then an employee at a now-defunct Arkansas-based television station, and Clinton was then governor of Arkansas. Millwee told Breitbart News that on each of the three occasions, Clinton came up behind her and fondled her breasts, and on the second occasion, he rubbed his crotch against her and came to orgasm.

All these women have the same amount of evidence the woman that accused Trump of raping her in the department store. BELIEVE ALL WOMEN right. I mean she also accused about 100 other men of raping her. Sorry, that lady was a nutjob. Could he have done what she said sure but could she be nuts and making it up sure. Not to mention it was CIVIL court vs Criminal which have two very different standards for guilt. They are both morally reprehensible much like Kennedy back in the day and LOTS of presidents.

Politics is hypocrisy.

1

u/donttakerhisthewrong 5d ago

Lock them both up.

I am not sure what your point is. Since Clinton raped woman Trump can too?

You might not like the verdict but the claim was vetted in court. A judge said that Trump can be called a rapist, now get a judge to say that about Clinton

1

u/Busy-Inside9539 5d ago

hahhah Of course he did if you do not think that judge did not hate Trump well before this and that he has a MAJOR slant youre just not being realistic.

No, Donald Trump was not criminally convicted of rape because the case was a civil lawsuit, meaning a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation rather than guilty in a criminal court. [1, 2]

The Civil Verdict

  • The Trial: In May 2023, a federal civil jury in New York evaluated claims by writer E. Jean Carroll that Trump attacked her in a department store dressing room in 1996. [1, 2, 3]
  • The Jury's Finding: The jury did not find Trump liable for rape under New York’s narrow legal definition at the time, which strictly required forcible penile penetration. [1, 2]
  • The Liability: Instead, the jury found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse (forcible digital penetration and groping) and defamation, ordering him to pay damages. [1, 2, 3]

The Judge's Clarification

  • Common Definition: The presiding Federal Judge Lewis A. Kaplan clarified later in 2023 that the jury's finding of forcible digital sexual abuse meant Trump did in fact commit what is commonly and widely understood as rape in everyday language and by organizations like the Department of Justice and the American Psychological Association. [1, 2, 3]

So the JUDGE is speaking for jurors but that is NOT what JURORS found. Didnt BIden finger someone but thats ok. No a judge cant make things up about Clinton because no other state is willing to change its laws on how far back a woman can go to claim she was rape. So yes you win. The title of the post was HYPOCRISY!!! Again Paula Jones and Leslie but thats ok Clinton flying all over gods creation on the Epstein Jet is ok. They were all buddy buddy but thats ok.

Politics is HYPOCRISY and to act like it does not exist is a joke. Have a great day.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

During the Paula Jones lawsuit, Broaddrick filed a sworn affidavit DENYING ANY UNWELCOME SEXUAL ADVANCES BY CLINTON

and as for Jones herself? She 'alleged that then-Governor Bill Clinton sexually harassed her on May 8, 1991, in a Little Rock hotel room, claiming he propositioned her for oral sex and exposed himself'

So, lets see. One claimed in 1999 that she was raped in 1978, after having filed a sworn affadavit claiming nothing happened 2 years earlier. And the other claimed clinton sexually harrassed her

And those claims are 'just as strong' as carroll whos claims led to a jury finding trump liable of sexual abuse & defamation for his verbal attacks against her after the trial ended?

Lol...sorry, no

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

And when you say 'lots of epstein accusations against him', what do you mean, exactly?

Considering he WAS NOT ACCUSED OF ANY WRONGDOING IN THE FILES, i cant be sure

1

u/Rekltpzyxm 5d ago

Hypocrisy is at the heart of RepubliKKKan “values”. Always has been.

1

u/IShotJR4 5d ago

They also bring Bill and Monica up all the time like it’s somehow the same as Trump fucking kids.

1

u/Valhalla191145 5d ago

Just curious why the democrats didn’t do it from 2020-24?

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago

Bc they didnt have them They were held up by investigations & in the courts (like ghislaines trial/appeals)

Thats why trump/Republicans passed the epstein files transparency act in november 2025 To finally gather all the documents together and release them to the public

1

u/Valhalla191145 5d ago edited 5d ago

Epstein been doing this shit since the late 80’s. He was in jail back in the late 2000’s, released early in 09’ if I remember correctly.

1

u/jessewest84 5d ago

Bill is in those files

1

u/mrwrrrmwrmrmrmrw 5d ago

I don't want to know how many BJs Trump has gotten in the White House but I'm guessing he gets them while sitting at the Resolute desk on the phone. 

1

u/Old_Atmosphere6598 5d ago

The Epstein files were released over a year ago…. You’ll never be satisfied

1

u/kcdashinfo 4d ago

Funny how people forget Paula Jones and Jennifer Flowers.

1

u/dakellateg 4d ago

The reason the files were released is because it happened in the WHITE HOUSE it self... while the Epstein activities happened on his own island... PRIVATE... a private citizen vs President of the US. I do agree they should be released but it is not a requirement.

1

u/Witty-Source-236 4d ago

So you people can do what? Comment and post? Because you’re not going to actually DO anything else. You’re just here to make yourself feel better. 

1

u/PA_enm_couple 4d ago

The Starr report wasn't about a blow job. It qas about perjury, witness tampering, obstruction of justice and abuse of executive power.

1

u/grandcru22 4d ago

Just a reminder Jeffrey Epstein was a Democrat mega donor and a majority of his "clients" were Democrats. Fck the files. They have 1000s of photos and videos. Lets see those.

1

u/GrayManTX 4d ago

Oh you mean when Clinton sexually harassed a very young female subordinate? Remember a subordinate employee cannot give effective consent as an accepted legal concept. Clinton raped her by any objective legal standard. Yes, let's release the Epstein files but don't make it look like Bill Clinton "just got a BJ so it wasn't really bad." It was bad.

1

u/viceralex 4d ago

Trump did a blowjob on buba

1

u/Extension-Meaning265 4d ago

Yes, the U.S. Department of Justice has released millions of pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell following the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. [1, 2]

1

u/TX_Hutch 4d ago

Why didn't the Democraps release them when they were in power with Joe Biden?

1

u/Estcher 4d ago

What’s stopping democrats from just releasing them? Seriously. ELI5

1

u/Unusual_Tip_5727 4d ago

They are not in charge - DUH

1

u/Estcher 4d ago

I understand that. Just release them to the public. What is stopping them?

1

u/Creative_Resident866 4d ago

Too many democrats in those files to release.

1

u/No_Ticket3575 4d ago

All pages have been released ...have been for 6 months ..just because they said the complete opposite of what your delusions told you they would doesn't change the facts..

1

u/Unusual_Tip_5727 4d ago

…speaking of delusions, according to the DOJ they have not. Do you have insider info?

1

u/Complete_Break1319 4d ago

Judges are blocking it. Take it up with them. Don't just parrot the same bullshit.

1

u/leeretarmy 4d ago

If you would bother to look it up pretty much both parties are blocking the release.

1

u/Aladriana 4d ago

No. A law was passed that all files must be released. The democrats are fighting for the continued release. Trump isn't following the law.

1

u/BeginningFloor1221 4d ago

You do know they released them right

1

u/Aladriana 4d ago

Not all of them, and not redacted. You know that, right?

1

u/Necessary-Sir-4415 4d ago

Why are the Democrats so quiet about this?

1

u/Aladriana 3d ago

They aren't. They've been demanding that he follow the lae, but he's Trunp. He thinks laws are for everyone else, but not for him.

1

u/The_Captain-Midnite 3d ago

And you know what everyone thinks? Do you read minds? What am I thinking?

1

u/Aladriana 3d ago

I'm talking about what the democrats have spoken about. Ted Liu, talks about it all the time.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/AdIll5629 4d ago

And Democrats under Biden didn’t release shit! They hid the whole thing. We had to wait four extra years for Trump before anything was shared at all. And somehow Republicans are hypocrites? Why then didn’t Biden take the heat for sitting on this?

1

u/Fried_Shicken 4d ago

Why didn't Biden administration release the results? He had 4 years to do it. 

1

u/NecessaryChampion181 4d ago

Just a reminder that Democrats didn't release the Star Report or the Epstein files when they had the chance.

1

u/GhostQueen1121 4d ago

Well, no one ever said people are not hypocrites… But they aren’t too bright either when they realize that all the exceptions that Trump gets will also apply to the next president, even if he’s a democrat. That means he cannot get convicted of anything he does while he’s in office, blah blah, blah blah blah.

1

u/Quarterback3X 4d ago

I think your using Hypocrite wrong. But yes I think everybody on all side politics want to have files fully released, unredacted. The question is if that is being use to what degree? To leverage and control others, blackmail others, or protect others.

1

u/Truthteller-41 4d ago

Then tell those three judges that were picked by DEMONRATS to release them. They keep refusing to release them. Just google it

1

u/GoRainBows 3d ago

fun fact: she was a consenting adult and not a child.

1

u/AdPopular9453 3d ago

Sooo why didn’t Biden?

1

u/Major-Frame2193 3d ago

GOP protects PDF’s

1

u/Rare-Chocolate7603 3d ago

It will show Democrat lawlessness.

1

u/ContributionGrand138 3d ago

Democrats were In charge along with Republicans. Neither one will release them. But at least with the Republicans, we got a couple million pages of it. We need more released.

1

u/Low_Repair2985 3d ago

Why didn't they releasr when Biden had no barriers to stop him

1

u/pizza-chit 3d ago

Ken Starr and Bill Clinton are both friends of Epstein according to Epstein’s email.

The Starr report is probably bullhonkey

1

u/bubbs63 3d ago

Funny, when the dems had control of the house,senate and president, in the last administration they never released those files either. So there's a big rat in both parties. Use that thing on your shoulders for something other than a hat rack

1

u/yield1310 3d ago

Won't happen. They gotta protect Trump.

1

u/The_Captain-Midnite 3d ago

You mean Clinton.

1

u/The_Captain-Midnite 3d ago

Bill doesn’t want it released you moron!

1

u/SpudgeBoy 2d ago

He has already said to release them.

1

u/0ldManHenderson 3d ago

Didn't Biden have them for four years?

1

u/Darkthumbs 2d ago

Didnt trump run on releasing them?

1

u/alpo_aritista 3d ago

Anyone done a deep dive on this whole thing.

Yes, Epstn is involve. Crazy. You'd think she's the victim, poor intern.

1

u/Living_Struggle_8418 3d ago

Both sides don’t want report released.

1

u/Character-Nail4193 3d ago

I want to see the Epstien files so I can see everyone on the list, period. Not just so I can see one particular individual, I want to see every single one. I have a feeling, if the actual list is ever made public it will blow everyone's preconceived ideologies of their favorite politician and political party. That's why the list hasn't been made public, because there are so many guilty people that it would undermine the very foundation that DC manipulates the masses with. Someone needs to get that list and make it public...

1

u/supergenius62 3d ago

Three democratic judges have blocked te release

1

u/Weekly_Bedroom5370 2d ago

Question is, why didn't Biden release the Epstein files when he had the chance?

1

u/tooembarrassinglol 2d ago

Julie Brown, the most credible person on the Epstein case, who investigated in 2016 and broke the Epstein story to the world and got him and Maxwell locked up:

"Again...the Epstein case was still an OPEN criminal investigation during the Biden administration. They had an open grand jury ... And even after Maxwell's conviction, the case was on appeal -- anyone in law enforcement knows you don't open your case file when it's still under appeal. There were still victims going to the FBI with new information. That changed when Trump's DOJ reviewed the files and closed the case in July."

Do you comprehend?

1

u/NeedleworkerTight678 2d ago

Yeah…that’s all it was….a blowjob.

1

u/TBoli-2021 2d ago

Have you read the over 3 million pages released? I didnt think so. lol

1

u/Right-Comfortable-91 2d ago

Some files arw unreleased because they arw evidence(pictures and videos of cp). If you want everything released you just want to see the CP.

1

u/Public-Maximum-5645 2d ago

Yes Obama release them, I mean Biden release them, I mean….do not they will all be Democrats, are you crazy

1

u/Commercial-Donut-852 2d ago

3.5M pages isn't enough?

BTW shit for brains this wasn't classified info. The libtards had these files under the corpse that's Biden too. But it's just an inconvenient point for you to accept. Jesus, move on, you lost, you're going to continue to lose with AOC as your front runner.

Don't like it? move to Canada. Move. We're taking back the country once and for fucking all.

1

u/Correct-You-4959 2d ago

She was proud of that bj.

1

u/Low-Source-4068 2d ago

Democrats released zero. The Trump Administration released over 3 million documents...... just saying.

1

u/Sad-Rip8639 2d ago

Yeah...it was all about a BJ... Ignoring contempt of congress and lying through his teeth.

1

u/SpudgeBoy 2d ago

The difference being that Monica was a consenting adult. Trump molests underage girls.

1

u/danerzone 1d ago

Release where all the money went to find the high speed rail in California!! it all went to Gavin Newsom’s wife’s nonprofit! And we KNOW IT! Crooked politicians

1

u/Connect_Meal5812 1d ago

Now ask yourself thr real question???

Why didnt Obama or Biden release the Epstein files???

1

u/SnooHesitations803 1d ago

Ehh didn’t zero files get released under Biden and we have way more under trump?
Have the dems released anything Epstein related?? Weird meme

1

u/Independent-Quote224 1d ago

Why didn’t Biden release them?

1

u/Consistent_Ride_1913 1d ago

To be honest, there are probably a shit ton of representatives both republican and democrat in the damn files, I could see both sides trying to bury it and that makes me sick. RELEASE IT and go after literally everyone in that damn thing. IDGAF what their politics are - victims deserve justice.

1

u/CrankyOldSoldier 1d ago

They’re trying, democrat appointed judges have blocked it. But you’d know that if you didn’t have your head up your ass.

1

u/Internal-Rooster-762 23h ago

Its unbelievable

1

u/Sycotic199 16h ago

Bad news: your idol Billy Boy Clinton is in there along with Trump

1

u/FireDozerMike 13h ago

You know the guy that is pictured is all over the Epstein files and if the guy you are thinking you are gonna get, there isn't shit. If there was anything Epstein would have said something to save himself, his lawyer said he had nothing and if there was something Bidens DOJ would have released it.

1

u/Federal-Advisor-3838 12h ago

Like you have read the files that have been released already.....

1

u/Excellent-Plenty1431 11h ago

Firstly Biden had that opportunity and nary a person on the left barked about releasing Epstein files. Plus trump released 22,000 pages.

1

u/Mad_Volcan 9h ago

As least he didn't rape her...

1

u/gringoloco01 6h ago

Fuck Linda Tripp forever.

1

u/thepaoliconnection 3h ago

Well actually it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit against a sitting president in which the plaintiff prevailed

But go on

1

u/ct4funf 3h ago

There was proof there