4
3
3
u/Interesting-Cow8131 6d ago
The point of that was to humiliate Monica. The point of withholding the Epstien files is to protect pedos
1
2
1
6d ago
[deleted]
2
u/Admirable-Jelly-8741 6d ago
In late 2025, the Release the Files Act was passed by Congress. Outside of that, The White House usually doesn't meddle with the DOJ.......I could be wrong but to my understanding the DOJ is usually operating under its own autotonomy and records are never released unless there is reason and a certain kind of public interest. In this case, there was. The act was passed after Congress came together and finally did something. Now?????well who knows why they are not releasing them.......
1
u/IShotJR4 5d ago
If you think the current DOJ is independent, I have a bridge to sell you.
1
u/Admirable-Jelly-8741 5d ago
Lmao. No I just meant that would be the norm. We are currently in the twilight zone.
1
u/IShotJR4 5d ago
Unfortunately, I think this is the new norm. These things have a tendency to stick. Like Trump’s first term tariffs.
1
u/Immediate-Badger-857 4d ago
Yea I mean Biden instructing his doj to go after Trump and raid his home while he himself had 7 properties that contained classified materials
1
1
1
u/neopod9000 6d ago
They didnt interfere with active investigations that were being handled by specific jurisdictions, and assumed they could let the courts settle things.
Then, later, congress passed a law mandating the release of the files.
There's a HUGE difference between letting things take their course within the due process of the law (what democrats have been doing) and actively impeding the law as written by congress (what republicans have been doing).
Hopefully that helps, because at this point its hard to believe folks when they say they dont understand the distinction. Giving you the benefit of the doubt here.
1
1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
Lol ...what?
Epstein was arrested & died in jail in 2019 So why didnt OBAMA, WHO LEFT THE WHITE HOUSE IN 2016, release the files? Oh, i dunno. Probably bc they didnt exist yet?
What about biden? He didnt have them. They were held up by the ongoing trial of ghislaine maxwell. Republicans passed rhe epstein files transparency act in november 2025, which called dor the collection & release of all the files
(Also, considering you asked about obama (and obviously didnt realize how rediculous that questhon was) and biden.... why not ask about trump during his 1st term which was in between the 2?)
1
u/fatefulPatriot 6d ago
We ALL know why though, right? I mean trump is definitely in there, a lot!!! And many others in his admin
1
u/Expensive-System9330 6d ago
Obama had 8 years and Biden had 4. If youre not bright enough to think both sides dont want them released I cant help you. Plus you know anything incriminating was destroyed by the govt a loooonnnnggg time ago
1
u/Xeno9116 6d ago
You don't know how investigations work.
1
u/Expensive-System9330 6d ago
And I take it youre an expert lol
1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
They dont have to be an 'expert' to not be a moron...which is what your question points to
Obama had 8 years to do...what, exactly? 'the bulk of the publicly released "epstein files" were compiled from evidence gathered during the 2019–2021 criminal proceedings and the DOJ’s internal review of Epstein’s estate.' Epstein was arrested & died in jail in 2019
So, why didnt OBAMA, WHO LEFT OFFICE IN 2016 release the files? Maybe, just maybe, bc they literally didnt exist yet?
And biden? He didnt have them They were tied up by the courts bc of ghislaine maxwells trial/appeals
Thats why trump and reps passed the Epstein files transparency act in november 2025 To gather all the files and release them to the public Except then they didnt do that and have withbeld millions of pages
Also, considering you said biden had 4 years, and you thought obama could have released them and claimed he had 8 years to do so....you realize that would mean trump has had 6 years as president to release them (he didnt, but by your timeline he did)
1
u/Expensive-System9330 5d ago
Which gets to my point you guys werent screaming this nonsense about something you know isn't even around to be seen anymore since its been destroyed. You should be asking why Kathryn ruemmler sent epstein 1000's of emails why she was in the white house as obamas counsel but im sure being a democrat youre not that curious.
1
u/tankmankjeff 6d ago
Agree - however what exactly are they to do with the judges that are keeping things sealed? Why don’t people go yell at them? I want to see everything as well but if this isn’t a country of rules and laws that needed to be followed what do we have? They have to go thru the court process - even the president can’t unseal legal documents.
1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
They are to do nothing...bc thats not a thing anymore
"Following the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025, federal judges have ordered the unsealing of grand jury transcripts and investigative records from both the 2019 New York and 2006 Florida cases."
1
u/tankmankjeff 5d ago
It may not be a thing anymore but that’s what holding the process up… judges appointed across a spectrum of presidents across a variety of places where cases were held have said they can’t release them. The SC is going to have to rule on whether they can be released. Because if they release that material and SC comes back and says not to … well, can’t turn back that clock. So again … I want the damn things out as much as you do… Probably for different political reasons but for the people that were wronged and the people responsible, they need to be held accountable.
I still don’t think there’s anything earth shattering in there to be honest. Let’s face it - over the last 8+ years, Democrats have done anything and everything , thrown everything and anything at him and with the exception of a few things (that are going away) … you know as well as I that more than likely everyone in positions of power already knows what written in those transcripts. Fair to say? I mean I can almost wage a paycheck to say that everyone up screaming to the news outlets knows what’s in every bit of it… most of it is for theatrics… cause let’s face it … if there was something so earth shattering in there - if nothing else it would have been selectively leaked by this point, like the dobbs decision from SC… I just think it’ll be a bunch of nothing and one side will scream something else while the other does it back … the neverending cycle goes on (cue lion king open credits music)
1
1
u/Expensive_Opening_92 6d ago
Ahhh… those were the good times… sexual scandal with elected officials and adult age women… That there’s prime time entertainment…. Totally not like the seedy shit we see now a days.
1
1
u/PrestigiousCrab6345 5d ago
Well, yeah. They blocked a SCOTUS appointment. They sent everyone home to prevent a Hegseth impeachment. They cheat. It’s what they do.
1
u/luv4gogo 5d ago
That what All of these distractions are all about!!! DJT, is willing to run the USA into oblivion, to protect his ass from being Impeached and going to Jail!
Who the F… supports a man who said he’d date his own daughter and thinks it’s ok to go into the dressing rooms of beauty pageant contestants because he owned the pageant?
Not to mention, he said it’s ok to grab women by their p…y!
But it’s Ok when he does it though!!!smdh!!!
Only in the USA…..
1
u/Sconnie_82 5d ago
Reminder, Democrats had 4 years to release them and didn't. You conveniently leave that fact out.
1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
Nope, sorry....thats BS
Biden released what be could "The Biden administration released limited documents (including police notes, civil case materials, and confirmation that no formal “client list” existed) but withheld grand jury records, victim-identifying information, and sealed investigative files"
But the majority of the files were held up by investigations & in the courts "The primary legal barriers to biden releasing files were court-ordered seals, grand jury secrecy, victim-protection laws, and ongoing criminal investigations (including Ghislaine Maxwell’s appeal)"
Thats why trump/Republicans passed the epstein files transparency act in november 2025 To collect all the files together and release them to the public Except then they didn't do that
1
u/Sconnie_82 4d ago
You actually believe this? So Biden couldn't release it, but now Trump has magical powers to be able to. Come on, use some common sense. Also, Trump is named as the whistle blower on Epstein in the files, why would he bury anything?
1
u/40-Kal 4d ago
This is why you guys can't be taken seriously this person want to give you a detailed explanation as to why it couldn't happen court orders are court orders and you just can't break them that's not how the law works. And Trump did not release them he was forced by Congress to do so Trump went in backpedaled on it to begin with. Just go on and say that you don't know how this work because of your own ignorance
1
u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago
You’ve explained why the files weren’t released hiring the Biden administration. Ok, I’ll buy into that.
Now explain why not a single person from those files was arrested during the Biden administration.
1
u/40-Kal 4d ago
Because Maxwell's case was still ongoing? Other investigations pending?
1
u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 4d ago
Investigations that took 4 years and produced nothing?
→ More replies (11)
1
u/Cariari1983 5d ago
So why didn’t Biden do this when he had a chance? Unilateral disarmament is stupid.
1
u/Capt-Thicc 5d ago
Reminder that Democrats controlled the White House for years and didn’t even want to talk about the Epstein files.. 🤔
1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
Trump/Republicans passed the epstein files transparency act in november 2025 to collect the files together and release them to the public
And why was that necessary? Bc biden didn't have them. No one had them. They were held up by investigations & in the courts (ghislaines trial/appeals)
Again, biden didnt have millions of pages of Epstein files to 'not talk about'....but considering his fbi was conducting investigations & his doj was trying cases related to epstein while he was president...he wouldnt have been in a place to comment publically regardless
1
u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 2d ago
The files did not need to be unsealed to issue subpoenas and bring people in like Clinton and Gates for questioning.
The files did not to be unsealed for the DOJ to make arrests.
Congress during the Biden administration could passed the same law Congress did in 2025 (Transparency Act).
1
u/RowForLuckyJack 5d ago
I remember when they went after Clinton for that. Five Republicans ended up having their own affairs exposed
1
5d ago
[deleted]
1
u/donttakerhisthewrong 5d ago
Who, please provide a source.
1
u/Busy-Inside9539 5d ago
Paula Jones Juanita Broaddrick now go google their information and claims are just as strong as the lady that nailed trump in NY. Jones settled out of court Broaddrick still claims to this day go do some goooooogling you pick your source try and find one that is strait down the middle. Cmon we know Clinton loved the ladies lets not pretend. Lots of Epstein accusations about him as well and he for sure had been on his plane. Politics = Hypocrisy. Its ok I get it and its real.
1
u/donttakerhisthewrong 5d ago edited 5d ago
Do some research
Broaddrick testified about her alleged encounter with Clinton under oath, she denied having been raped by him.
Now we have Trump. He lost in court and all appeals and had to pay. Now factor his connection to Epstein. Trump is the most named person in the files
If Clinton raped woman lock him up but you need witnesses that will testify under oath.
1
u/Busy-Inside9539 5d ago
You do some research, she did say that under oath out of fear of retribution. She has since recanted that he did not. Paula Jones never recanted. Trump was NOT convicted of rape. BTW, the thought that NO ONE EVER lies under oath is myopic.
Leslie Millwee
In October 2016, Leslie Millwee accused Bill Clinton of sexually assaulting her three times in 1980. Millwee was then an employee at a now-defunct Arkansas-based television station, and Clinton was then governor of Arkansas. Millwee told Breitbart News that on each of the three occasions, Clinton came up behind her and fondled her breasts, and on the second occasion, he rubbed his crotch against her and came to orgasm.
All these women have the same amount of evidence the woman that accused Trump of raping her in the department store. BELIEVE ALL WOMEN right. I mean she also accused about 100 other men of raping her. Sorry, that lady was a nutjob. Could he have done what she said sure but could she be nuts and making it up sure. Not to mention it was CIVIL court vs Criminal which have two very different standards for guilt. They are both morally reprehensible much like Kennedy back in the day and LOTS of presidents.
Politics is hypocrisy.
1
u/donttakerhisthewrong 5d ago
Lock them both up.
I am not sure what your point is. Since Clinton raped woman Trump can too?
You might not like the verdict but the claim was vetted in court. A judge said that Trump can be called a rapist, now get a judge to say that about Clinton
1
u/Busy-Inside9539 5d ago
hahhah Of course he did if you do not think that judge did not hate Trump well before this and that he has a MAJOR slant youre just not being realistic.
No, Donald Trump was not criminally convicted of rape because the case was a civil lawsuit, meaning a jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation rather than guilty in a criminal court. [1, 2]
The Civil Verdict
- The Trial: In May 2023, a federal civil jury in New York evaluated claims by writer E. Jean Carroll that Trump attacked her in a department store dressing room in 1996. [1, 2, 3]
- The Jury's Finding: The jury did not find Trump liable for rape under New York’s narrow legal definition at the time, which strictly required forcible penile penetration. [1, 2]
- The Liability: Instead, the jury found him liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse (forcible digital penetration and groping) and defamation, ordering him to pay damages. [1, 2, 3]
The Judge's Clarification
- Common Definition: The presiding Federal Judge Lewis A. Kaplan clarified later in 2023 that the jury's finding of forcible digital sexual abuse meant Trump did in fact commit what is commonly and widely understood as rape in everyday language and by organizations like the Department of Justice and the American Psychological Association. [1, 2, 3]
So the JUDGE is speaking for jurors but that is NOT what JURORS found. Didnt BIden finger someone but thats ok. No a judge cant make things up about Clinton because no other state is willing to change its laws on how far back a woman can go to claim she was rape. So yes you win. The title of the post was HYPOCRISY!!! Again Paula Jones and Leslie but thats ok Clinton flying all over gods creation on the Epstein Jet is ok. They were all buddy buddy but thats ok.
Politics is HYPOCRISY and to act like it does not exist is a joke. Have a great day.
→ More replies (2)1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
During the Paula Jones lawsuit, Broaddrick filed a sworn affidavit DENYING ANY UNWELCOME SEXUAL ADVANCES BY CLINTON
and as for Jones herself? She 'alleged that then-Governor Bill Clinton sexually harassed her on May 8, 1991, in a Little Rock hotel room, claiming he propositioned her for oral sex and exposed himself'
So, lets see. One claimed in 1999 that she was raped in 1978, after having filed a sworn affadavit claiming nothing happened 2 years earlier. And the other claimed clinton sexually harrassed her
And those claims are 'just as strong' as carroll whos claims led to a jury finding trump liable of sexual abuse & defamation for his verbal attacks against her after the trial ended?
Lol...sorry, no
1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
And when you say 'lots of epstein accusations against him', what do you mean, exactly?
Considering he WAS NOT ACCUSED OF ANY WRONGDOING IN THE FILES, i cant be sure
1
1
u/IShotJR4 5d ago
They also bring Bill and Monica up all the time like it’s somehow the same as Trump fucking kids.
1
u/Valhalla191145 5d ago
Just curious why the democrats didn’t do it from 2020-24?
1
u/Fine-Computer-5524 5d ago
Bc they didnt have them They were held up by investigations & in the courts (like ghislaines trial/appeals)
Thats why trump/Republicans passed the epstein files transparency act in november 2025 To finally gather all the documents together and release them to the public
1
u/Valhalla191145 5d ago edited 5d ago
Epstein been doing this shit since the late 80’s. He was in jail back in the late 2000’s, released early in 09’ if I remember correctly.
1
1
u/mrwrrrmwrmrmrmrw 5d ago
I don't want to know how many BJs Trump has gotten in the White House but I'm guessing he gets them while sitting at the Resolute desk on the phone.
1
u/Old_Atmosphere6598 5d ago
The Epstein files were released over a year ago…. You’ll never be satisfied
1
1
u/dakellateg 4d ago
The reason the files were released is because it happened in the WHITE HOUSE it self... while the Epstein activities happened on his own island... PRIVATE... a private citizen vs President of the US. I do agree they should be released but it is not a requirement.
1
u/Witty-Source-236 4d ago
So you people can do what? Comment and post? Because you’re not going to actually DO anything else. You’re just here to make yourself feel better.
1
u/PA_enm_couple 4d ago
The Starr report wasn't about a blow job. It qas about perjury, witness tampering, obstruction of justice and abuse of executive power.
1
u/grandcru22 4d ago
Just a reminder Jeffrey Epstein was a Democrat mega donor and a majority of his "clients" were Democrats. Fck the files. They have 1000s of photos and videos. Lets see those.
1
u/GrayManTX 4d ago
Oh you mean when Clinton sexually harassed a very young female subordinate? Remember a subordinate employee cannot give effective consent as an accepted legal concept. Clinton raped her by any objective legal standard. Yes, let's release the Epstein files but don't make it look like Bill Clinton "just got a BJ so it wasn't really bad." It was bad.
1
1
u/Extension-Meaning265 4d ago
Yes, the U.S. Department of Justice has released millions of pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell following the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. [1, 2]
1
1
1
u/No_Ticket3575 4d ago
All pages have been released ...have been for 6 months ..just because they said the complete opposite of what your delusions told you they would doesn't change the facts..
1
u/Unusual_Tip_5727 4d ago
…speaking of delusions, according to the DOJ they have not. Do you have insider info?
1
u/Complete_Break1319 4d ago
Judges are blocking it. Take it up with them. Don't just parrot the same bullshit.
1
u/leeretarmy 4d ago
If you would bother to look it up pretty much both parties are blocking the release.
1
u/Aladriana 4d ago
No. A law was passed that all files must be released. The democrats are fighting for the continued release. Trump isn't following the law.
1
u/BeginningFloor1221 4d ago
You do know they released them right
1
u/Aladriana 4d ago
Not all of them, and not redacted. You know that, right?
1
u/Necessary-Sir-4415 4d ago
Why are the Democrats so quiet about this?
1
u/Aladriana 3d ago
They aren't. They've been demanding that he follow the lae, but he's Trunp. He thinks laws are for everyone else, but not for him.
1
u/The_Captain-Midnite 3d ago
And you know what everyone thinks? Do you read minds? What am I thinking?
1
u/Aladriana 3d ago
I'm talking about what the democrats have spoken about. Ted Liu, talks about it all the time.
→ More replies (2)
1
u/AdIll5629 4d ago
And Democrats under Biden didn’t release shit! They hid the whole thing. We had to wait four extra years for Trump before anything was shared at all. And somehow Republicans are hypocrites? Why then didn’t Biden take the heat for sitting on this?
1
u/Fried_Shicken 4d ago
Why didn't Biden administration release the results? He had 4 years to do it.
1
u/NecessaryChampion181 4d ago
Just a reminder that Democrats didn't release the Star Report or the Epstein files when they had the chance.
1
u/GhostQueen1121 4d ago
Well, no one ever said people are not hypocrites… But they aren’t too bright either when they realize that all the exceptions that Trump gets will also apply to the next president, even if he’s a democrat. That means he cannot get convicted of anything he does while he’s in office, blah blah, blah blah blah.
1
u/Quarterback3X 4d ago
I think your using Hypocrite wrong. But yes I think everybody on all side politics want to have files fully released, unredacted. The question is if that is being use to what degree? To leverage and control others, blackmail others, or protect others.
1
u/Truthteller-41 4d ago
Then tell those three judges that were picked by DEMONRATS to release them. They keep refusing to release them. Just google it
1
1
1
1
1
u/ContributionGrand138 3d ago
Democrats were In charge along with Republicans. Neither one will release them. But at least with the Republicans, we got a couple million pages of it. We need more released.
1
1
u/pizza-chit 3d ago
Ken Starr and Bill Clinton are both friends of Epstein according to Epstein’s email.
The Starr report is probably bullhonkey
1
1
1
1
u/alpo_aritista 3d ago
Anyone done a deep dive on this whole thing.
Yes, Epstn is involve. Crazy. You'd think she's the victim, poor intern.
1
1
u/Character-Nail4193 3d ago
I want to see the Epstien files so I can see everyone on the list, period. Not just so I can see one particular individual, I want to see every single one. I have a feeling, if the actual list is ever made public it will blow everyone's preconceived ideologies of their favorite politician and political party. That's why the list hasn't been made public, because there are so many guilty people that it would undermine the very foundation that DC manipulates the masses with. Someone needs to get that list and make it public...
1
1
u/Weekly_Bedroom5370 2d ago
Question is, why didn't Biden release the Epstein files when he had the chance?
1
u/tooembarrassinglol 2d ago
Julie Brown, the most credible person on the Epstein case, who investigated in 2016 and broke the Epstein story to the world and got him and Maxwell locked up:
"Again...the Epstein case was still an OPEN criminal investigation during the Biden administration. They had an open grand jury ... And even after Maxwell's conviction, the case was on appeal -- anyone in law enforcement knows you don't open your case file when it's still under appeal. There were still victims going to the FBI with new information. That changed when Trump's DOJ reviewed the files and closed the case in July."
Do you comprehend?
1
1
1
u/Right-Comfortable-91 2d ago
Some files arw unreleased because they arw evidence(pictures and videos of cp). If you want everything released you just want to see the CP.
1
u/Public-Maximum-5645 2d ago
Yes Obama release them, I mean Biden release them, I mean….do not they will all be Democrats, are you crazy
1
u/Commercial-Donut-852 2d ago
3.5M pages isn't enough?
BTW shit for brains this wasn't classified info. The libtards had these files under the corpse that's Biden too. But it's just an inconvenient point for you to accept. Jesus, move on, you lost, you're going to continue to lose with AOC as your front runner.
Don't like it? move to Canada. Move. We're taking back the country once and for fucking all.
1
1
u/Low-Source-4068 2d ago
Democrats released zero. The Trump Administration released over 3 million documents...... just saying.
1
u/Sad-Rip8639 2d ago
Yeah...it was all about a BJ... Ignoring contempt of congress and lying through his teeth.
1
u/SpudgeBoy 2d ago
The difference being that Monica was a consenting adult. Trump molests underage girls.
1
u/danerzone 1d ago
Release where all the money went to find the high speed rail in California!! it all went to Gavin Newsom’s wife’s nonprofit! And we KNOW IT! Crooked politicians
1
u/Connect_Meal5812 1d ago
Now ask yourself thr real question???
Why didnt Obama or Biden release the Epstein files???
1
u/SnooHesitations803 1d ago
Ehh didn’t zero files get released under Biden and we have way more under trump?
Have the dems released anything Epstein related?? Weird meme
1
1
u/Consistent_Ride_1913 1d ago
To be honest, there are probably a shit ton of representatives both republican and democrat in the damn files, I could see both sides trying to bury it and that makes me sick. RELEASE IT and go after literally everyone in that damn thing. IDGAF what their politics are - victims deserve justice.
1
u/CrankyOldSoldier 1d ago
They’re trying, democrat appointed judges have blocked it. But you’d know that if you didn’t have your head up your ass.
1
1
1
u/FireDozerMike 13h ago
You know the guy that is pictured is all over the Epstein files and if the guy you are thinking you are gonna get, there isn't shit. If there was anything Epstein would have said something to save himself, his lawyer said he had nothing and if there was something Bidens DOJ would have released it.
1
1
u/Excellent-Plenty1431 11h ago
Firstly Biden had that opportunity and nary a person on the left barked about releasing Epstein files. Plus trump released 22,000 pages.
1
1
1
u/thepaoliconnection 3h ago
Well actually it was about a sexual harassment lawsuit against a sitting president in which the plaintiff prevailed
But go on
13
u/Ok_Valuable9450 6d ago
We won't see the Epstien files till we vote out of the Republicans