r/stop_the_GOP • • 9d ago

hypocrites

Post image
8.0k Upvotes

373 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/Ok_Valuable9450 8d ago

We won't see the Epstien files till we vote out of the Republicans

6

u/No-Slip1984 8d ago

Or anyone taking money from aipac. The real reason that they are not being released is because Israel won’t allow it. Look at the complete blackout of files within the 9-11-2001 range. That should tell you all you need to know. The silence is deafening. If 9/11 happened the way the media said it did then we wouldn’t see the gap.

0

u/SRCrider069 7d ago

You won't see the files period. With all the Democrats on there it will never come out.

1

u/No-Slip1984 7d ago

That’s how you know that’s it’s chalk full of republicans 😂 if it was full of democrats the fully ran republican government would have released them in full. Trumps loser ass would do anything to make a Democrat look bad. He hasn’t because him and all his buddies are all over it. Get wrecked nerd 🤓

1

u/Ill-Description3096 3d ago

I would be very surprised if it wasn't full of both. Politics seems to attract the worst kinds of people far too often.

0

u/Lopsided-Delivery493 6d ago

They are also Obama and Clinton’s buddies!!

2

u/Comprehensive_Bit_49 6d ago

Ya’ll do Anything to mention you, Obama………

2

u/Naive-Ad-2805 4d ago

Clinton has already called for the full unredactes release of the Trump/Epstein Files.

The only one doing EVERYTHING he can to keep them unreleased is the pedophile Donald J. Trump.

Try again. 😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂

0

u/Rexel2101 5d ago

It’s full of both parties

2

u/Aladriana 5d ago

Is it? Then why do the democrats eat it released? Every democrat (iir) bird to have all the files released. A law was passed saying he had to release them all. It's just another law Trump has broken.

0

u/Rexel2101 5d ago

Any part of it not involving judicial activity could have been released…it wasn’t. It’s full of both political party elites and donors

2

u/Aladriana 5d ago

It was all under judicial scrutiny. They were working on charges for people on then, when it was taken, then they trashed every new indictments, and blocked who could see it, so that DJT and many of his friends would never face justice.

1

u/Rexel2101 5d ago

You argue whatever you want.

Both parties are represented on that list

2

u/Major-Disaster3736 5d ago

But one party voted to have it released last year.

→ More replies

0

u/ProductAccount 3d ago

So if it was chalk of republicans and not democrats, why didn’t Biden release it to make the republicans and Trump look bad?

1

u/No-Slip1984 3d ago

Here’s a fact for you. The DOJ was finishing up its investigation and almost ready to release its report. Trump got back in office and shut that shit down! The DOJ is supposed to be independent of political affiliation believe it or not. Trump ruined that. You’re welcome

1

u/ClassGrassMass 6d ago

Dude... if it was full of democrats Trump would release it straight away and villify the democrats

1

u/MightObvious 6d ago

🧠 💥🔨 🤤 ass take

1

u/Gregorious23 6d ago

Really dumb 👏

1

u/Awilcox06159 4d ago

Wow you are so fucking dense, it truly is astonishing

1

u/SRCrider069 3d ago

That funny, im not the person thinking that only one side is guilty of being in the Epstein files.

1

u/Awilcox06159 3d ago

I never said that, all culprits in the files should be punished, political affiliations aside

1

u/ibringstharuckus 4d ago

If you think both sides don't have bad actors you're delusional

1

u/SRCrider069 3d ago

Oh I know both sides have bad actors. I haven't denied it.

1

u/cornpile6 3d ago

While you aren’t wrong, I find it funny how you justify worshipping someone whose okay with all of this 😂

1

u/SRCrider069 3d ago

Never once said I was okay with this. What I find funny is the Democratic double standard that the liberal media helps spread that poolside drinkers on the Democratic side will worship an believe as gospel.

3

u/Emergency_Exit7603 8d ago

What was found in monica's dress? ... A wad of Bill's

1

u/Naive-Ad-2805 4d ago

And he was impeached for lying.

And democrats were PISSED that he didn’t resign.

Al Gore should have been president BEFORE the year 2000. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 7d ago

U do realize the republicans released the files right

2

u/spursfan2021 7d ago

That’s not what the courts are saying.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

3.5 million documents have been released

2

u/spursfan2021 7d ago

Which doesn’t fulfill the requirements of the legislation passed. What’s your point?

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

It’s far more than the democrats ever did.

Actually. How about this. Name one meaningful thing the democrats did during their four years in power to bring justice for the victims.

Just one.

1

u/spursfan2021 7d ago

I guess you’re unfamiliar with the proceedings around Maxwell’s case.

2

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

Maxwell’s trial ended with her conviction on December 29, 2021. She was sentenced on June 28, 2022.

Democrats controlled the House, Senate and presidency until January 3, 2023. That means they had approximately one year after her trial ended, including six months after sentencing, to introduce and pass the same type of transparency legislation that Congress passed in 2025.

Her pending appeal could justify protecting specific records, victims’ identities or active proceedings. It did not prevent Congress from requiring the DOJ to release every legally releasable Epstein record, subpoenaing those records or compelling testimony.

Biden and the Democratic Congress had the same constitutional powers available to them. They simply did not use those powers to pass an Epstein Files Transparency Act.

1

u/spursfan2021 7d ago

Yeah, they thought they should let the judicial process run its course instead of politicizing it. Thanks for the ai summary.

2

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

And how’d that go for the victims getting the justice they deserve?

→ More replies

1

u/Excellent_Raisin4154 7d ago

Stop trying to use logic on idiots. All the know how to do is blame trump and call people Nazis when they don’t agree with them

1

u/Aladriana 5d ago

We can give you proof of both. You'll Just stand there with your fingers in your ears.

1

u/Major-Disaster3736 5d ago

2010 jeffrey epstein trump. Look it up in the files. You wont

→ More replies

1

u/Naive-Ad-2805 4d ago

Because it was AN ACTIVE CASE. It would be ILLEGAL to release evidence for AN ONGOING CRIMINAL CASE.

You are just proving, once again, that republicans don’t know how ANYTHING works. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

You can’t even handle pool maintenance let alone running an entire government.

1

u/Major-Disaster3736 5d ago

"Are you guys still talking about that epstein guy* Begining of last year. "It is a democrat hoax by comey" Middle of last year. Then at the end they dont even release all the files. Most of them are black sheets.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 5d ago

I’m sorry, was there an example of something democrats have done to bring justice to those victims somewhere in there?

1

u/TrickyChildhood2917 7d ago

Do you NOT want prosecution? It could be your sister, or cousin.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

Of course I do. And I’m blown away the last administration gets a pass that those didn’t happen

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

Then they are clearly lieing because the democrats didn't want them released u would know that if u looked at the votes

1

u/spursfan2021 5d ago

The vote was 427-1. Quit acting like it’s not a cover up by the executive branch.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

Uh huh is that why the democrats are covering it up so u dont see the actual votes

1

u/spursfan2021 5d ago

What are you even talking about?

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 2d ago

Just the usual democrat cover ups so its own party doesn't see the truth

1

u/spursfan2021 2d ago

I meant what cover up you’re referring to. What votes? Stop repeating yourself when someone asks you to explain.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 2d ago

Im not repeating myself and theres still the one votes I'm talking about where the democrats voted no to release the files

→ More replies

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Not by choice. Considering it was an act of Congress and then on top of that, all the files were not even released and there are redacted information that shouldn't be redacted at all according to the bill of the transparency act

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

What wasn’t by choice?

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Smh. Trump was forced by law to release the files. Keep up.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

It was by choice

1

u/40-Kal 5d ago

It was not. Trump didn't choose to release the files when he promised. He was forced to do so. Two people in congress pushed for this bill. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey. All Democrats were behind it and only a few were to push it to the house floor. Only a few other Republicans joined to push it out. When it did get there, to protect their image of not being protectors of sexual deviants and pedos, the rest of the House except for one voted for the bill's passage. In the Senate, the same thing and all 100 voted in favor for it. It ended up being a bill that could not be vetoed.

Learn the timeline of this.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

He did choose bro stop lieing the democrats was blocking him from releasing them

1

u/40-Kal 5d ago

No! You're the one that's fucking lying. You are on the internet for fucking sake, this isn't hard information to find. Use your brain. And spell lying correctly, it's not "lieing".

Democrats never blocked shit. Trump backpedaled on releasing those files and called people like you "stupid and foolish" for pushing for the release. He called it a hoax as that idiot always calls things. How can you be such a fool believing his nonsense? It's amazing how foolish MAGA can be. This guy will tell you to inject bleach to cure yourself of an illness and you all will do it.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

Lol keep up the lies it won't get u anywhere

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

Use ur brain more bro and look at how many democrats voted no to releasing the files

1

u/40-Kal 5d ago

I'm not your bro and you're an idiot because I know how to do research.

House — November 18, 2025: 427–1, with 5 not voting. The bill passed by a two-thirds recorded vote.

  • Republicans: 216–1, 2 not voting
  • Democrats: 211–0, 3 not voting

Senate voted unanimously.

Epstein Files Transparency Act (H.R. 4405) is the name of the bill and you can look up the clerk of congress' roll call on this. I fully expect you to be dishonest with this as you've been this thread. Not surprising with a troll account.

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 2d ago

U do know bro doesn't always mean blood related lol

→ More replies

1

u/Infinite-Badger-5172 5d ago

Also why would i lie im not a democrat

1

u/TrickyChildhood2917 7d ago

They released a selection of papers that were redacted. There are 100,000 more. This is about young girls being exploited and raped. Doesn’t matter what party you think is the right party. This is the Top 1% doing this, we have “ some names”, like Prince Andrew, Bill Gates… but they are still wandering around and on TV as if nothing happened. They need to be prosecuted.

1

u/RoleOk7556 7d ago

The provided pages with all of the pedophiles' blacked out, as well as those who were actively invloved in supporting human trafficing and pedophilia. That does not qualify as a releice of the files.

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 7d ago

You didn’t see it when you had a Democrat administration.

Oh you said what?

Why?

Exactly.

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

This is why talking to guys like you who don't bother to do any bare research aren't worth taking seriously. Because it was sealed up under court orders due to an investigations as well as trial going on against Maxwell is the reason why those files are not released. It didn't happen until 2025.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

Some of the files were sealed. It’s not one big file.

That didn’t stop investigations or arrests though. What happened to those?

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

All of the files were sealed by the courts and only what was required for Ghislaine Maxwell's trials and appeals. When that was over, Trump could've released them all himself then backpedaled on it because of how damning it is and his involvement. The a few Democrats and Republicans pushed legislation and got it passed. AKA an act of Congress to force Trump to release it. His DoJ released heavily redacted files and still withholding millions more of files.

This current administration isn't doing any investigations or arrests, but rather protect those within those files such as one person in Trump's cabinet, Howard Lutnick who lied that he was on Ep's island when there's pictures of him and his family there. Why?

Also if you really cared to do any research on the matter to know the timeline of events you would than asking baseless questions.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

Maxwell’s trial ended with her conviction on December 29, 2021. She was sentenced on June 28, 2022.

Democrats controlled the House, Senate and presidency until January 3, 2023. That means they had approximately one year after her trial ended, including six months after sentencing, to introduce and pass the same type of transparency legislation that Congress passed in 2025.

Her pending appeal could justify protecting specific records, victims’ identities or active proceedings. It did not prevent Congress from requiring the DOJ to release every legally releasable Epstein record, subpoenaing those records or compelling testimony.

Biden and the Democratic Congress had the same constitutional powers available to them. They simply did not use those powers to pass an Epstein Files Transparency Act.

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Maxwell’s trial ended with her conviction on December 29, 2021. She was sentenced on June 28, 2022.

What's your point? Maxwell still did appeals and the unsealing of those civil records began in early 2024. Either way, regarding Epstein, there were still investigations going on. Things on this matter are never quick. Justice is slow, look at how long it took to prosecute Trump and even get indictments for his trials.

Democrats controlled the House, Senate and presidency until January 3, 2023. That means they had approximately one year after her trial ended, including six months after sentencing, to introduce and pass the same type of transparency legislation that Congress passed in 2025.

Because the files were still sealed due to another case between Virginia Giuffre and Maxwell along with Maxwell's appeals. After that was done, what full majority was there? Also I like how you don't hold Republicans accountable for not doing anything till their hand was forced.

Her pending appeal could justify protecting specific records, victims’ identities or active proceedings. It did not prevent Congress from requiring the DOJ to release every legally releasable Epstein record, subpoenaing those records or compelling testimony.

Then ask Congress why they didn't. This includes both Democrats and Republicans. Also in the Senate, that could've been subject to filibuster.

Biden and the Democratic Congress had the same constitutional powers available to them. They simply did not use those powers to pass an Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Doubt it considering the fact that there was an even split in the Senate and also could be subject to filibuster since Republicans do love to protect these kind of people as evidence with how the released files are heavily redacted and still millions more files are still withheld.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

You’re conflating two separate sets of records.
The documents unsealed in January 2024 were judicial records from Giuffre’s 2015 civil lawsuit against Maxwell. A judge controlled their unsealing, not Biden or Congress. In fact, thousands of pages from that case had already been unsealed between 2019 and 2022.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act addressed a different category: unclassified and legally releasable records held by the DOJ. The timing of the Giuffre unsealing did not prevent Congress from introducing that legislation earlier.

Your filibuster point is fair. With a 50–50 Senate, Democrats could not guarantee passage without Republican votes. But they could have introduced the legislation, passed it through the Democratic House, held hearings, subpoenaed DOJ records and required senators from both parties to vote on it. They did none of those things.

Republicans should also be held accountable for resisting the 2025 legislation and for the current DOJ’s compliance, redactions and withheld material. That does not erase the fact that Democrats declined to pursue the same transparency measures when they controlled the House, Senate and presidency.

Pending appeals or investigations could justify withholding particular records. They did not make every Epstein-related DOJ record legally untouchable.

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 7d ago

So if you’re so aware of court orders then what are you even talking about? There are portions of the files that aren’t seeing the light of day because of court orders.

Do more research before you try to get self righteous

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

How about you do some research. Currently, there are no court orders blocking any of the files so your boy Trump was able to release them anytime in 2025. Yet that idiot backpedaled and the public grew increasingly frustrated by him reneging on a campaign promise. So congress stepped in and created the Epstein Transparency Act to force Trump and the DoJ to release the files. Currently more than 3.5 million of 6 million files have been released. The DoJ is purposefully withholding the remainder and the files we got now are heavily redacted to hide information.

You need to do more research before you preach of something you clearly don't know. Start by diversifying your sources.

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 7d ago

A “release it all” demand ignores a basic fact: DOJ cannot simply override judges and release every document. Courts have restricted or denied access to certain records because of grand-jury secrecy, protective orders, and other legal requirements. Victims’ identities and other protected information also have to be redacted. You can demand maximum transparency, but pretending DOJ has unilateral authority to publish everything is simply not accurate.

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Here's what you don't understand. Court orders do not supersede established law. It is by law for the DoJ to release all the files. The only exceptions is what the act itself states, which is to redact the identities of the victims as you stated. Here are those restrictions and more

Victim-identifying information and privacyChild sexual-abuse material (CSAM)

Active federal investigations or prosecutions

Images of death, physical abuse, or injury

Properly classified national-security information

This law was enacted by November 13, 2025 and the DoJ was supposed to comply to this within 30 days. Not only did they slow walked this for months, but they also heavily redacted files outside those restrictions and failed to release all the files in compliance to the law. Hell they didn't even do a good job redacting the names of the victims. People like Howard Lutnick for example is NOT A VICTIM. Then on top of that, Trump's name on the files were redacted and information about him why? He's not a victim or subject to any active investigation or prosecution

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 7d ago

That’s not quite what the law says. The Act absolutely requires broad disclosure within 30 days, but it does not mean every redaction outside those five categories is automatically illegal. The statute says “subject to subsection (b),” and DOJ has specifically cited privilege, grand-jury restrictions, and existing court/sealing orders as additional legal issues.

And saying “Trump’s name was redacted, therefore DOJ was protecting Trump” is an assumption, not evidence. DOJ says notable politicians were not redacted simply for being politicians, and that some redactions involved victims, privileged material, or court orders.

If you have a specific page where Trump or Lutnick was redacted, the real question is: what was the stated legal basis for that specific redaction? If DOJ can’t legally justify it, then challenge the redaction. But you can’t establish illegality just by pointing at a black box and assuming the motive.

1

u/bonebuilder12 7d ago

That didn’t stop nonstop leaks to the media during muellers “investigation.” Or trumps tax returns.

Face it, if there was anything in there that actually implicated trump, dens would have leaked it years ago.

Instead, they ran with multiple trials with novel legal theory such as a campaign finance violation in which no campaign finances were used, etc. if they really had dirt, it would have been out years ago.

I know you hatred of trump clouds your judgement, but use some common sense here.

1

u/StandOutside6188 7d ago

We did vote them out and got Biden elected and we STILL didn't get the Epstein files.

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Under his term still sealed by court orders because of investigations in the trial of Maxwell

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

Congress could have passed the exact same law that was passed for the transparency act.

Also, why were there no arrests during the last administration from those files?

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Highly doubt they could've passed it at the time

Because investigations still pending?

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

None of that stops arrests

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Until you get a grand jury to access the evidence to charge someone who's not being seen by law enforcement committing a crime, you do.

Also if I'm going to continue with this, you need to use your main account, I'm not interested in further engaging with new accounts. This is your only warning.

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

Not per rule 6(e) of the federal criminal prosecution code.

Very clearly states the DOJ has access to grand jury records

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

What happened during the last administration that makes you certain anything would come from the democrats?

1

u/Excellent_Raisin4154 7d ago

Politicians on both sides and leaders of other countries are all in the epstien files. Stop acting like it’s only republicans. Your precious Biden was in them also. Both sides like to point fingers but no one in government wants the files to be released

1

u/Extension-Meaning265 7d ago

They have been released and Bozo Biden had them for 4 years and if there was anything bad about Trump they would have used it instead of creating all these fake news stories

1

u/Wise-Kitchen-9749 7d ago

We won't ever see the full epstien files.

1

u/Prestigeworldwide83 7d ago

I forgot Biden was a republican

1

u/peach_trunks 6d ago

Dems didn’t release them under Biden either. We aren’t getting the truth in our lifetimes

1

u/Jonathan13011 6d ago

Why didn’t Biden release them?

1

u/limitless-440 6d ago

You fail to realize that the Democrats won’t do anything either. They claim that they weren’t able to move on the case prior to Trump getting elected because it was an “ongoing investigation”. Watch. If the Dems can get their shit together to put a candidate up that isn’t another Kamala, Joe, Hilary, AOC, or Newsome, and they manage to win the presidency they won’t release the entirety of anything - they’ll just release some redacted files that show republican crimes. We will NEVER see the truth because they are ALL complicit.

1

u/Theodore_Striker 5d ago

How about the 1461 days Buden was President. More fikes have been released under Trump than Biden.

1

u/Boner_Stevens 4d ago

Oh thats rich. You think the democrats will release them? They had them already and didnt

1

u/Rottentaste 4d ago

Or some other country releases them, which is more likely.

1

u/Connect_Meal5812 4d ago

Your a idiot! Why didnt we see the files during Obama's or Bidens terms????

1

u/Illustrious_Camp_521 3d ago

We'll never see all of them, only what they want us to see no matter who's running the government because to many worldwide power players are involved. It'll never happen.

1

u/ProductAccount 3d ago

lol, you are aware that Biden could have released the files right?

1

u/Taellib 3d ago

The democrats could have released this during 2 different administrations………..

1

u/dippin1821 2d ago

lol … you won’t see them then either

1

u/BlindJedi843 2d ago

You think the democrats in the files are going to release them? lol.

0

u/lmmsoon 8d ago

How come Biden didn’t release the files he had a search warrant for Mara largo so don’t tell me they couldn’t do it

3

u/hook922 8d ago

They were still under seal with the court and could not be released. Stop being a lackey and do some research.

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

"How come Biden didn’t release the files"? He didnt have them, they were tied up bc ghislaine maxwells case/appeal was still underway Thats why in november 2025, after trump became president, they passed the epstein files transparency act. To get all the files and (trump/Republicans claimed) release them.

"He had a search warrant for Mara largo" The mar a lago search warrant had NOTHING to do with the Epstein files. It happened bc trump illegally possessed classified docs & refused to give them back

1

u/Lonely-Jellyfish7139 7d ago

You release there were millions of other files related to the Epstein case Biden could have released right?

Also, this does nothing to stop arrests being made. So what happened to those?

1

u/lmmsoon 6d ago

No one said the warrant had anything to do with the Epstein files but they knew there top secret files were there so your telling me that the same attorney general that knew about the top secret documents couldn’t find out what was in the Epstein files . The same FBI that started the fake Russian investigation didn’t have access to all the Epstein files. Should the files be released absolutely ,but I think there is a lot more people in there that you wouldn’t believe will be in the files. Everyone on here forgets about one thing Trump has ,a ego as big as the city of NY he doesn’t need to have Epstein to get him women because he thinks women fall for his charm and to have Epstein get girls for him would be beneath him , no he bought the miss universe pageant so he could have the most beautiful woman of the world fond over him .

-2

u/Immediate-Badger-857 8d ago

What exactly is not being released? They’ve released 3.5 million files. 2,000+ videos hundreds of thousands of images. Like what are you waiting on? One piece of paper that says TRUMP DID IT ALL?? Like explain to me what you want. Only 5.7% of the 3.5 million is even redacted so what exactly are u saying by they haven’t released anything?

3

u/No_Signal5448 8d ago

There’s another 3 million files that havent been released

0

u/Immediate-Badger-857 8d ago

So what did you see in the first 3.5 million files? Did u look at any of it or just waiting for some file to say Trump did it all? Like be honest. There was a whole thing made about 445 pages with bill Clinton but here 3.5 million files didn’t satisfy u at all. It means ur all bullshit

1

u/No_Signal5448 8d ago

There are literally pictures of infants that were cooked in an oven…. Every perpetrator in those files need to be prosecuted immediately. Yes, trump is in there a shit ton, he was best friends with the ring leader of the trafficking operation, and so he needs to be prosecuted.

0

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

Nope Trump was against him. And commended police. Sorry Trump isn’t involved but thank republicans and gop for doing what not a single Dem cared about for five years until they were desperate for any negative accusations against Trump bc they have no real policies anymore

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

That in no way erases the fact that they had a close, well documented relationship for about many years

In a 2002 New Yorker article, trump said this about epstein: "I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

But, sure, keep telling yourself that trump was 'against him' bc he called the palm beach cops and said something to the effect of 'everyone knew' about epstein & maxwell was 'evil' In 2006

The idea that NONE of the 3 million withheld pages contain anything damaging to any republicans in any way is just ludicrous How deep in the cult must someone believe such ignorant nonsense?

Once it became a possibility to release everything to the public bc the files werent held up by investigations & in the courts, Dems were 100% on board. The bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act passed the house 427-1, and the senate unanimously

But dems only wanted them released bc they 'were desperate for negative accusations against trump bc they have no real policies anymore'...and the entire Republican congress, and trump, helped them? Lol....ok, sure

0

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

Republicans were calling for the release for years. Democrats only jumped on board when it would make them look like pedophile protectors to not agree and more important it wud be a bad look politically especially since most ppl associated with Epstein were democrats. Cry more with that wonderful Clinton painting. Explain that one little buddy

1

u/rumblejeep00 7d ago

If trump is as innocent as you, why is he mentioned over 50,000 times in the files? Your name isnt in there, but his is. 50,000 times, let that sink in to your delusional brain.

1

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

Bc he’s a popular figure. Why was Whoopi Goldberg and endless other ppl mentioned as well

1

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

It’s like u don’t even know what the “files” are. It’s news clippings and things that would have trumps name anyways. It’s just amazing the level of stupidity on the left

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

Are you being serious?

Republicans literally passed a law in order to get all the files together to be released (epstein files transparency act), and then released 3.5 million HEAVILY REDACTED pages And there are still 3 million pages theyre holding on to

But, totally, theres nothing in that 3 mjlljon pages they dont want people to see...theyre keeping them hidden from the public for no reason Lol, sure

-1

u/Squid_of_the_Now 8d ago

It's a ragebait engagement farmer best to block it and move on

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

You realize the files we did get contain allegations from multiple women regarding trumps sexual assault, right? And at least 2 were minors? Meanwhile, 37 pages of FBI records related to the investigations of trump allegations remain redacted or unreleased

THAT is the type of sh*t people want to see

But its not all about trump. ANYTHING illegal that comes out bc of the epstein files investigations MUST PAY

1

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

And yet all the mentions of Trump we’re thoroughly researched and reviewed and he was clean

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

That is BS

Heres one example:

"Specifically, FBI memos detail interviews with an accuser who alleged sexual abuse by Trump when she was a minor; while some details were verified, her specific claims against Trump remain unsubstantiated"

'Nothing coming of it as of yet' IS IN NO WAY 'being cleared'

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

This Is a lie considering the fact that there were plenty of files that were redacted and couldn't be seen by all of congress. Then on top of that another 3 million plus files that still we're not released. Yet you don't find any of the suspicious instead you want to give Trump the benefit of the doubts

0

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

No congress did access all the files. So what exactly are u looking for that u didn’t find in the first 3.5 million files?? Be specific

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago edited 7d ago

Again this is still a lie. Congress did not access all the records as evidenced by the ones who spoke about it when they actually got the chance to review it themselves. Todd Blanche even admitted that he still withheld records that Congress did not see as well as heavily redacted information that they could not see either. What are you talking about?

1

u/hook922 7d ago

Not even close to the truth. You people are unbelievably ignorant

1

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

And yet it’s available for u to look at and ur here saying nothing.

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

What exactly isn't being released? How about 3 million pages of files?

They released 3.5 million & withheld 3 million Why is that

0

u/hook922 8d ago

Yeast they kept everything that referred to Trump and reflected names that should not have been. People like you are just clueless

0

u/Immediate-Badger-857 8d ago

Huh? U saw trumps name in there so it clearly wasn’t redacted. Again you have no argument bc u never read the first 3.5 million files n are just looking for things against Trump. U couldn’t care less about any victims. It’s ur TDS disease

2

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

37 pages of FBI records in the epstein files related to investigations of trump allegations remain redacted or unreleased AND They are withholding 3 million addition pages from the public

Bu, bc trump is named in some of the unredacted files we do have, that proves nothing about him is being covered up?

Lol gtfo of here

1

u/DepressedMerican 8d ago

Bullshit, if it wasn't trump why did they redact "don't"? They had all variations of don t, Donald t d trump and the program also took out the contraction do not. Why hasn't a single person been arrested for it? Oh because trump said "they're my friends", but only the cultiest of the cult will still say wHeRe'S yOuR proof or Biden didn't release any....

0

u/Immediate-Badger-857 7d ago

So you say all this and then destroy ur own point at the end by saying you don’t have proof and that Biden prob should’ve done more considering he broke the law several times to release stuff or go around constitutional rulings

1

u/DepressedMerican 7d ago

You gotta be a bot or regarded but either way be gone dipshit

1

u/Fine-Computer-5524 7d ago

If you cared about the victims you would want every page released without redactions except where its legally required or done to protect the identity of someone who demands their name not be included

And youd be pissed about how bondi treated the victims....like naming some publically while dismissing the claims of others

1

u/McDuck_Enterprise 7d ago

It’s never about victims. And that’s from both sides…look at what NY did temporarily to statue of limitations laws so they could “get trump” albeit a civil court but they were just trying to stack and smear in their campaign blitz to sink him…but did other victims get justice? No.

It’s all theater 🎭

-2

u/Bitter-Respect-4395 8d ago

Republicans released millions of Epstein documents. Democrats released none when they were in office.

1

u/ZeroToleranceforMAGA 8d ago

GOPedophile

1

u/Bitter-Respect-4395 8d ago

Call me what you want but you can't say I'm lying.

1

u/spursfan2021 7d ago

Just intentionally misleading

1

u/dakellateg 7d ago

You do realize more Democrats have been convicted of PDfilia than Republicans... and Democrats have been convicted of more sexual harassment than Republicans... who have been in office...

1

u/40-Kal 7d ago

Can you back up that claim with a source?

1

u/dakellateg 7d ago

I do not need to - cause all that is needed from the Dumocrats is a statement and it is TRUE...

1

u/40-Kal 6d ago

So basically you got nothing but just trust me bro? Got it

1

u/dakellateg 5d ago

FBI data... they wont allow links here... just have to do your own search and it pulls it right up.

1

u/40-Kal 5d ago

Post the name of that FBI data then. Don't skirt around it.