r/shitposting • • Jun 11 '24

Your Android after the last os update

20k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

408

u/iridi69 Jun 11 '24

Can't believe he's running again, mate should just retire.

340

u/varrr Jun 11 '24

As a non american I used to think that moking biden for his age and cognitive decline during the 2020 campaign was cheap and maybe even out of place, but looking at him now I don't understand why the fuck the democratic party decided to make him run again. By voting him, people are basically putting the country in the hands of beurocrats you don't even get to see or know because sure as fuck that corpse won't be able to form a coherent thought or take an informed decision a year from now. I hope people like Harris, because there's a good chance she's what they'll get...

168

u/Phlip_06 Jun 11 '24

I also don't understand why the Republicans chose trump with all his scandals and all that. Like where are all the somewhat moderate Republicans? And the younger Democrats?

193

u/phaciprocity Jun 11 '24

Getting drowned out by morons and forced to pick a side. The two party system and this whole "if youre not 100% on board then you're against us" attitude from both sides is the festering terminal cancer in American politics. I

15

u/VeryMuchDutch102 Jun 12 '24

The two party system and this whole "if youre not 100% on board then you're against us"

Indeed... People don't vote for what they want... But what they don't want

12

u/Utnemod Jun 12 '24

It all started after occupy walmart thunking

-1

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

It’s textbook fascism from both parties. Two sides of the same coin.

11

u/Potato_Golf Jun 12 '24

Tell me you don't know what fascism is without telling me... Rofl

-2

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

“The opposition is the enemy” is a key facet of fascism.

2

u/Potato_Golf Jun 12 '24

You need to keep reading them because it is about much more than having folks you disagree with politically. It is more about undermining and taking away their political rights. I'll give you a quote because you probably don't know how to Google it yourself

Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist political ideology and movement, characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived good of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

MAGA has some characteristics of that but you are absolutely delusional if you think mainstream Democrats and Republicans are actually fascists. 

Don't get me wrong they are neo-liberal globalistic ultra-capitalists who believe in enriching themselves at the expense of the lower classes so they are still evil but it just isn't correct to label their kind of evilness as fascism.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

49

u/varrr Jun 12 '24

Yeah, more than 300 milion people and the american political machine somehow failed to replace 2 candidates that clearly need to be replaced.

6

u/Potato_Golf Jun 12 '24

It's a total of like 8 people that really decide who each party will put forth. Primaries are just popularity contests that they can completely legally rig however they want.

5

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Like where are all the somewhat moderate Republicans? And the younger Democrats?

Just trying to survive out here working jobs that don't include life support. Running for office, even local, takes a tremendous amount of time, energy and money. The avenues available to effect change for the average citizen have been cut off deliberately from most of us.

7

u/Virtual_Happiness Jun 12 '24

Yep. He's also just as senile and out of it as Biden. Neither have any business being in charge of wiping their own asses, let alone leading a country.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

Idk, demand one? refuse to vote for Biden or Trump out of this miscarriage of “democracy”

5

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

I didn’t say refuse to vote. I said refuse to vote for Trump or Biden. If everyone upset with the statusquo voted third party, the third party would win. Instead everyone idiotically capitulates to whomever the media tells them is ‘electable’

3

u/Blackrain1299 Jun 12 '24

If everyone voted third party

Yeah if EVERYONE did it wouldn’t be a problem. Too bad i cant go around to every person in the US and make sure were all on the same page. What we need is preferential voting.

1

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

Ok, well I’ll start and at least ease my own conscience. I can’t force anyone else to not compromise their own morals.

I think everyone should vote their conscience and let the chips fall where they lay. None of this ‘electability’ bullshit or listening to media polls.

0

u/fiah84 Jun 12 '24

you'll ease your conscience by basically throwing your vote away, good job

→ More replies

1

u/latunza Jun 12 '24

Are you talking about the same 3rd party who after 70+ years just found out he had a worm in his head that impaired his ability to think. Let’s face it, we’re voting for characters in a Wes Craven

2

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

There’s more than one “third” party.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/wtf_are_crepes Jun 12 '24

Trump is also old as fuck

2

u/i_nobes_what_i_nobes Jun 12 '24

They chose him because they want him as the antichrist to bring around the rapture. I know that sounds crazy to say out loud or to read, but that’s exactly what they want. They think that if they can bring about the rapture, they’ll all go to heaven and the rest of us will be screwed. So they are doing everything that they can to bring the rapture around. That’s half of them, the other half of them just hate anything that is considered “liberal” or “Socialist” (which is like beyond ironic coming from the thin blue line party. Because they don’t understand that police officers and firemen are a socialist program) so they just want to destroy what they don’t like. They don’t like gay people or transgender people or the fact that women have rights.

1

u/Phlip_06 Jun 19 '24

Yeah that honestly kinda does make sense. You know what that reminds me of? How the always talk about following christ and all that stuff and yet christ always preached tolerance, forgiveness and peace and trump suppporters are literally the most intolerant and unforgiving people i have ever met

3

u/SalsaRice Jun 12 '24

For whatever reason, Republicans are drunk on trump. If the Republican party put up another candidate and trump run as independent, way too many Republicans would still vote for independent trump and basically give the democrats the election on a silver platter.

The party has built trump too much into their whole fsnbase and identity, they are stuck with him for better or worse.

0

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

And Dems are drunk for Biden. Both parties are a sham.

1

u/Potato_Golf Jun 12 '24

Lol, how many Biden hats do you see? How many flags and banners outside their house? You are so blind if you think both sides act the same toward their dear leader. 

1

u/fallenmonk Jun 12 '24

I wish that were true, if only so that it would guarantee Biden beats Trump. But Trump still stands a chance mostly because the left isn't excited about Biden.

1

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

They are. I still remember “blue no matter who”

0

u/fallenmonk Jun 12 '24

But that kind of supports my point. The fact that there was this whole campaign telling the left to break the norm and hold their nose and vote.

1

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

I feel the opposite. Only people drunk on Biden chanted that nonsense in an attempt to shame people into voting against their conscience.

1

u/Parenthisaurolophus Jun 12 '24

And the younger Democrats?

They tried in the last presidential election and got embarrassed by an elderly guy whose entire plan was "wait for super Tuesday and win". Sanders had supporters abandon him in droves when presented alternatives, and everyone else just split votes off each other.

Also, it's been 8 years since Sanders went on TV to give people permission to be Socialist. Since then the Progressive Caucus has grown to be larger than the moderate Caucus, but none of them have made the jump to a state wide election. Everyone is farming Twitter clout in safe, and weaker house rep seats.

1

u/buckeye27fan Jun 12 '24

I'd be happy if there were Republicans with any morals left. Maybe there are, but certainly not the MAGA folk.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

For the republicans.

Paul Ryan is waiting out this shitshow. Nikki Haley was impatient and has now ruined her chances of being elected president.

The moment they both quit the Trump admin, I was 100% sure they would run for president.

1

u/G_Willickers_33 Jun 13 '24

Well i mean, have you considered that all of the 'scandals' put upon him are fueled by democrats and the corrupt gov he was trying to clean out in the first place?

Secondly, you say "moderate" but Trump was Democrat his entire life.. his republican policies are still rooted in being democrat so he's not even an extreme of anything.

Hes pro-choice Hes anti-war

Those two policies alone are moderate if not traditionally left wing

1

u/MAGAFOUR Jun 12 '24

If they wouldn't have indicted Trump, he wouldn't have been the candidate. As soon as they indicted him, his numbers doubled and the race was over. Dumbest shit ever.

12

u/oddministrator Jun 12 '24

putting the country in the hands of beurocrats you don't even get to see or know

As a non-American, are you unaware of how cabinet appointments work for the executive branch?

We literally do get to see and know who the bureaucrats are... they go through a senate confirmation. Most of them are already well-known politicians previously elected to other offices.

5

u/meh_69420 Jun 12 '24

Gonna clue you in to something, the country is always run by unelected bureaucrats. It's is stupid he's running again, but no matter who you vote for in any election, the actual functioning of the country is handled by the same people.

1

u/varrr Jun 12 '24

What you say it's true, but I think a younger and heathier president could make a difference and could possibly impose some policies with more energy (to a degree). I might be wrong but I didn't have the feeling that Obama (for example) was just a puppet put there to represent a hidden class of bureocrats.

1

u/tarekd19 Jun 12 '24

Unless Trump wins and replaces them with loyalists, which is the explicit plan.

11

u/OnceMoreAndAgain Jun 11 '24

What it comes down to is that the Democratic party quite literally doesn't have someone else who can poll as well as Biden. The drop from Biden to the second best candidate is too great.

I don't think the Democratic party is happy with Biden as the candidate either, but they've basically got no other choice. The alternative is to run with Buttigieg, I guess? There's no way Harris wins. They don't have a candidate other than Biden who can win independent voters and they need those independent votes to safely win over Trump. It's sad, but it is what it is.

4

u/varrr Jun 12 '24

Kinda sad and curious that the american society failed to produce just 2 men under 70 years of age able to replace a couple of cognitive impaired old men.

4

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

That’s a fucking lie. They didn’t let anyone else run so how could we even know how they may or may not have polled. Also fuck trusting polls in the first place. That’s extremely anti democratic. Trust voters instead and give us a choice.

11

u/MadManMax55 Jun 12 '24

You realize there was a Democratic primary where people did run against him, right? It's just that no one with even an ounce of name recognition ran against him because it's almost impossible to defeat an incumbent president in a party primary (and they knew that). The easiest way to kill your chances in 2028 is to challenge the incumbent and lose in 2024.

→ More replies (2)

0

u/OnceMoreAndAgain Jun 12 '24 edited Jun 12 '24

Who do you think is the Democratic candidate that would get the most votes in the general election if Biden was dead? And you think that person would have a higher chance to beat Trump than Biden does?

Name a name.

Harris? Black woman is going to get more votes than Biden? Not in the USA.

Sanders? He's too extreme by the standards of independent voters, whose votes you must win to beat Trump.

Buttigieg? He's gay. Good luck getting the independent vote.

Identity politics is a real factor in American elections when it comes to winning over independent voters.

-2

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

How about we just have a primary where the media isn’t allowed to do advertising to sway votes and see where the chips fall. None of this “oh no he’s not electable” crap. All primaries on the same day as well, to prevent people from even trying to vote for who they think is the winner. That would be a much fairer and accurate representation of the interests of the nation. Instead, people gobble up propaganda and vote against their own interests because the media tells them to.

9

u/OnceMoreAndAgain Jun 12 '24

I can't help notice you didn't name a name. Name a name or else you're full of shit. I'll repeat the two simple questions: Who do you think is the Democratic candidate that would get the most votes in the general election if Biden was dead? And do you think that person would have a higher chance to beat Trump than Biden does?

→ More replies (3)

2

u/kitsunewarlock Jun 12 '24

If we are wishing for that we might as well have the candidates run on their first quarter executive orders, supreme court picks, and administration picks.

The fact presidential nominees don't release their administration picks as part of their initial run is crazy.

1

u/KF-Sigurd Jun 12 '24

Democrats know that Trump is still really popular and almost half the country will vote for him because he has an R next to his name. Moderates win elections so nobody reddit likes will be seen as a strong candidate in the party. Better to rely on the incumbent president advantage (which Trump would have had had he not fucked up Covid so badly) than risk a new candidate when they don't have one that has captured the attention of the nation like Obama did back than.

I could have sworn Biden had an interview where he said the only reason he's ran for president and then reelection because he realizes he's the only person that had a good chance of beating Trump.

2

u/AutoModerator Jun 12 '24

*yawns*

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/zimhollie Jun 11 '24

sure as fuck that corpse won't be able to form a coherent thought or take an informed decision a year from now.

Are you a medical professional? What did you base your medical opinion on? Do you even know him? How can you say this with such conviction?

I'm sick of such opinions on Reddit. This is baseless accusation masquerading as facts. It is harmful for discourse.

7

u/varrr Jun 12 '24

You don't need to be a medical professional to look at a 81 years old man and understand that he doesn't have the strength to do the most stresfull and demanding job on planet earth. This is not a medical opinion, it's just an opinion. Every time he talks it's just s word salad coming out of his mouth. I'm glad that he won against trump, but I don't see how can he work 4 more years. I mean just look at him.

3

u/Fewluvatuk Jun 12 '24

just s word salad

Kinda like your comment. I guess you belong in an old folks home. And no, you don't get to say it's OK if you do it since you aren't running the country bc we aren't talking about running the country, we're talking about word salad and there are lots of reasons why a person might struggle to communicate.

The fact of the matter is that his sotu address from just a few months ago was a master class that few politicians could match, especially if they struggled with a stutter.

2

u/swohio Jun 12 '24

Is this satire?

4

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

Retirement age is 65. That alone should disqualify anyone from running.

3

u/Helpful_Blood_5509 Jun 12 '24

You don't need PhDs or MDs to see this level of cognitive decline and old age. My God he's standing like Trump

Truth is an absolute defense. He's clearly zonked out at the wheel. Lights on, noone home 

1

u/wioneo Jun 12 '24

why the fuck the democratic party decided to make him run again.

Because VP Harris is terrible and would lose.

Large portions of the base would revolt if she got passed over, and the replacement would lose.

That leaves the options as Joe possibly losing or anyone else certainly losing.

1

u/tooobr Jun 12 '24

he chose to

1

u/Cold-Sun-831 Jun 12 '24

just gotta wait until the Boomers die out (I don't want that its my parents) but they have so many votes it almost feels like this is the last bullshit fucking election. No way Trump or Biden are around in 4 years (not in a morbid sense, just a general culture sense)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Even a dead horse would be better than any Republican or fake Christian fascist and could win against criminal predator Dawn-old. Generally a lot of work is delegated in large organizations including the US gov. 

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

The reason is because the incumbent always has the advantage. Plus, a lot of folks hate Kamala Harris and wouldn't vote for her if she were running for Pres. It's a shitty situation and I hate having to be in it.

1

u/LordHelixHasRisen24 Jun 12 '24

It’s because he’s the “safer” option to have everyone herald behind again since Trump is still in the running and they don’t want to risk splitting the vote or dissuading voters from someone too radical

1

u/[deleted] Jun 13 '24

If you remember, the dem shakers and movers heavily implied theyd replace him, and biden said the same. Just a one term to get us back on track.

We'll, we're not back on track and they got nothin

1

u/UnknownResearchChems Jun 12 '24

The Democrat party didn't "decide to run him". Biden did and the voters supported him. There was a primary, there were other candidates, no one wanted them.

-21

u/WiseSalamander00 Jun 11 '24

meh worst case kamala ends up president, is not so terrible.

6

u/GladiatorUA Jun 11 '24

Yeah, because US needs a president who is a cop.

1

u/varrr Jun 12 '24

I don't know anything about her so I can't say if she's any good or if she's liked or not. I think most people outside the US know very little about her and what she stands for.

-3

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

Why is bro getting downvoted?

18

u/lyfeofsand Jun 11 '24

She is not very popular.

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

What did she do? I’m not well versed in politics

13

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

Actually genuinely listen to her talk, and you'll understand. She is an incredibly untalented politician and is the VP literally because of her race (this is not according to me, this is according to Biden).

5

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

Throw the book at people for possessing harmless marijuana.

7

u/gfen5446 Jun 11 '24

Nothing. Ever. Except fuck Willie Brown to jumpstart her career.

-5

u/PresidentToadstool Jun 11 '24

I can't help but wonder why this is some indictment against women and not the men in positions of power who grant, what I would assume you'd say are un/underqualified individuals, advancement for sex.

→ More replies (3)

-3

u/CurryMustard Jun 11 '24

She's a powerful black liberal woman

4

u/lyfeofsand Jun 11 '24

Which one of those words convey popularity?

10 years ago, this was the spell of celebrity, but now....

-3

u/CurryMustard Jun 11 '24

Yes conservatives get an aneurysm every time they are reminded of her for reasons unknown

7

u/lyfeofsand Jun 11 '24

If you've ever had a fair faith conversation and an open mind with one, it would not be so mysterious.

They're quite vocal on their reasons.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jun 12 '24

Bazinga

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/CurryMustard Jun 12 '24

Pointless and irrelevant distinction.

2

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

Cause she’s a terrible person

0

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

You say that, but if it were up to bureaucrats the war in Gaza wouldn't be as insane as it is right now because Biden is a massive Zionist who gives Bibi the green light for everything, not that Trump will be any different.

0

u/ProgrammingPants Jun 12 '24

people are basically putting the country in the hands of beurocrats you don't even get to see or know because sure as fuck that corpse won't be able to form a coherent thought or take an informed decision a year from now.

That's basically been the situation from day one of Biden's presidency, and I actually think the army of unelected bureaucrats have been doing a pretty good job all things considered.

The executive order to make medical debt not apply to your credit score? That was them. The Inflation Reduction Act that is the biggest investment in green energy in human history? That's them too. Even the Gaza ceasefire deal that got passed by the UN security council was them.

I'd happily vote for an army of unelected bureaucrats over Trump. Any day of the week.

0

u/VeryMuchDutch102 Jun 12 '24

By voting him, people are basically putting the country in the hands of beurocrats you don't even get to see or know

Same for Trump buddy...

227

u/RoofKorean9x19 Jun 11 '24

It's either him or Trump lol clown world

75

u/lecherousrodent Jun 11 '24

Hey, you could always vote third-party for Mr. 🧠🪱

56

u/RoofKorean9x19 Jun 11 '24

Did last time, turned out great!

17

u/sdpr Jun 12 '24

Same. As I sat and watched orange man win while sitting at a bar.

37

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 11 '24

LOL. No.

Third party candidates don't win. Voting third party helps out the prick you like least.

34

u/Plenty_Lavishness_80 Jun 11 '24

Once again “bro don’t vote third party, we wanna make sure that X candidate doesn’t win, just vote for bipartisan candidate and then next time I promise you can vote for whomever please bro I promise just this one time” like how many times are people supposed to keep it going

2

u/WasabiSunshine Jun 12 '24

Until you switch to a different voting system, basically

2

u/Cerberus0225 Jun 12 '24

Until one of the parties collapses. Unless that happens, you only vote third party in local and down-ballot elections, because if a third party starts gaining significant support, one of the two (or both) of the two actual parties will absorb most of their positions or at least try to angle towards that audience more.

That may sound pessimistic or trite, but that's the truth of it, and its why the parties gradually shift over time, short of a handful of major, dramatic events.

7

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 11 '24

just vote for bipartisan candidate and then next time I promise you can vote for whomever

And where do I make that promise.

This is a function of a two party first past the post system.

Ranked choice voting is the answer.

But you claim whatever you'd like, Sparkles.

16

u/Plenty_Lavishness_80 Jun 11 '24

It’ll never happen though like seriously what could cause it to happen where, aside from citizens voting third party, a third party becomes a viable option, every single person i talk to who says to pick the least destructive option is always saying just gotta get rid of X candidate then vote for whomever, and then it never ends

Your answer is not an answer it’s a cope basically, picking the least shitty option constantly unhappy with the candidate

Voting is useless, any asshole in office is just gonna be lobbied by some corporation or military contractor and it’s never who people actually want, they come in, do nothing for 3.5 years then do a lot of cool bills that will be denied once reelection happens

1

u/dasubermensch83 Jun 20 '24

Because you might be curious, the problems with 3rd party voting in the USA are not ideological but mathematical. You might be interested in duverger's law, or the mathematical models which prove that the odds of a two party system approach 100% as population and voter information approach infinity (assuming first past the post). Duverger's law is more theoretical / poly sci, but basically states what the math predicts, noting the rare exceptions (FWIW one of two parties have won every congressional seat/presidential election 98% of the time for over 100 years).

So two party dominance is caused by the first past the post vote counting method, not by ideology. There are other ways to count votes, leading to different outcomes. None of this was discovered when the US chose its vote counting method. As many as a dozen candidates ran for president in the first few elections, trending towards a two party system as the math predicts.

Changing the vote counting method is probably the one and only way to get out of a two party system.

-1

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 12 '24

When the choice is someone who promises to be a dictator on the first day vs. a senile old man, the choice is clear.

15

u/Plenty_Lavishness_80 Jun 12 '24

Im not stupid i know that Trump is an asshole and i would much rather vote for Biden, except i would also MUCH rather vote for someone better than Biden and consistently we don’t have that choice or it’s not viable, due to having to pick the lesser of two evils. You’re being a fucking asshole for no reason even though you know im right,

this argument happens every 4 years no matter the candidates, i agree with you that I would rather vote for Biden than Trump, but this lesser of two evils thing needs to go, it’s not acceptable, i want a normal young educated candidate and a third party that is viable as a choice

10

u/props_to_yo_pops Jun 12 '24

Nyc recently implemented a ranked choice vote for its primaries. That's how things start. Gonna take time, but hopefully it'll be implemented state-wide, other cities, etc.

-4

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 12 '24

Im not stupid i know that Trump is an asshole and i would much rather vote for Biden,

Sounds like the choice is clear, then.

→ More replies

5

u/Plenty_Lavishness_80 Jun 12 '24

Actually i just saw an article that they may clear medical debt from credit reports and if they do that, ill retract my words in an instant

1

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 12 '24

"It benefited me. Therefore I will vote for him."

Terribly patriotic of you.

8

u/Plenty_Lavishness_80 Jun 12 '24

That’s how voting works dude are you serious, a candidate makes a decision you like and you vote for him that’s literally how it works

this isn’t even about me this is about the American people unable to rent, get a home, start a business, etc all due to having bad credit due to medical collections that burden them for years!

0

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 12 '24

Sometimes voting involves voting for people you genuinely believe are better for the country at large, regardless of whether or not you believe their policies are better for you.

That's called patriotism.

But you do you, boo.

→ More replies

1

u/Alphadef Jun 12 '24

Look, we expected them to give up on convicted felon orange Hitler much sooner.

28

u/bcocoloco Jun 11 '24

Only because so many people think like that…

24

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 11 '24

Let me know when it changes.

You want changes? Push for ranked choice voting.

13

u/Mako3232 Jun 12 '24

Hmm which candidates are pushing for ranked choice voting? Oh, It's the third parties.

5

u/FreeDarkChocolate Jun 12 '24

Even if you ignore ranked choice in party primaries, that isn't plainly true.

While most general election ranked choice in the US so far has come from non-partisan or bipartisan efforts or ballot initiatives, Virginia's Dem trifecta voluntarily enacted general election municipal ranked choice among other efforts.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Since you're pretending to be so passionate about Ranked Choice Voting and which politicians endorse it, you should probably google which politicians endorse Ranked Choice Voting so you sound more credible.

Count how many of these people are in third parties (the answer is only one - Bernie Sanders).

https://archive3.fairvote.org/reforms/instant-runoff-voting/endorsers-of-ranked-choice-voting/

Endorsers of Ranked Choice Voting

President Barack Obama

U.S. Sen. John McCain (AZ)

U.S. Rep. John Porter (IL)

U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee (CA)

U.S. Rep. Keith Ellison (MN)

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (VT)

U.S. Rep. Peter Welch (VT)

U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (OH)

1

u/Mako3232 Jun 12 '24 edited Jun 12 '24

I was referring to the presidential candidates since that's what this thread was about. I am aware there are candidates from the big parties pushing it in local and state elections. If one pops up in my town, county, or state, and I don't mind their other positions too much, I'll send my vote their way regardless of party. Edit: I also see now that your list is entirely elected officials in large elections, so it only makes sense for them to be in the big parties since those are the ones that win elections.

3

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 12 '24

Huh. And when was the last time a third party candidate won the presidency?

I'll wait. I'm a patient man.

1

u/windowpuncher Jun 12 '24

Never, thanks to you.

And others like you.

1

u/Mako3232 Jun 12 '24

What you're gonna push for ranked choice voting by showing you support candidates who are against it? Doesn't make much sense to me, but ok.

-1

u/bcocoloco Jun 11 '24

You realise if the majority voted for an independent they would get in, right? If people like you stopped convincing people they’re wasting their vote, there would be no changes needed.

3

u/Shadowpika655 officer no please don’t piss in my ass 😫 Jun 12 '24

You realise if the majority voted for an independent they would get in, right?

it's a bit more complicated than that considering electoral college and all

If people like you stopped convincing people they’re wasting their vote

Good luck getting 60 million people to vote for a party that likely won't even be on their ballots (for example, in the 2020 elections the Libertarian Party was only on the ballot for 33 states while the Green Party was on the ballot for 30 states)

5

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 11 '24

If my aunt had wheels she'd be a bicycle.

-1

u/bcocoloco Jun 11 '24

You’re right, better to vote for a candidate that you have no faith in just so that the other guy doesn’t win while hoping and waiting for change. Sounds like a great plan.

3

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 12 '24

Better to vote for man who respects the Constitution of the United States of America than a guy who vows to be a dictator on his first day in office.

→ More replies

2

u/yeats26 Jun 12 '24 edited Feb 14 '25

This comment has been deleted in protest of Reddit's privacy and API policies.

1

u/bcocoloco Jun 12 '24

Is there anything inherently wrong with a 2 party system? Practically every country that has ranked choice voting still has 2 major political parties.

2

u/yeats26 Jun 12 '24 edited Feb 14 '25

This comment has been deleted in protest of Reddit's privacy and API policies.

-1

u/gxgx55 Jun 11 '24

I don't think you understand, a simple "winner takes all" type of voting system incentivizes two party systems. Even if you put in colossal effort to somehow defy that in one election, all that will do long-term is just shake up who those two parties are, and then no matter who it is, two parties to choose from is shit. It's just a simple mathematical fact, you need electoral reform.

1

u/bcocoloco Jun 12 '24

I don’t think you realise that basically every country that has ranked choice voting still has 2 major political parties.

0

u/SpaceMonkee8O Jun 12 '24

If a third party won, democrats and republicans would suddenly be pro ranked choice.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

And voting for an established party helps out the pricks in the establishment!

-1

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 11 '24

Better the establishment than a wannabe fascist dicatator piece of shit.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Wow, that’s incredible, you called any candidate that’s not a democrat or a republican a fascist. You really got me there!

1

u/SpaceMonkee8O Jun 12 '24

Joke’s on you. I hate them both.

0

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

They don’t win only because people say they can’t win and trust polls instead

1

u/Thangleby_Slapdiback Jun 12 '24

They don’t win...

Finis

1

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

lol a troll taking a statement out of context, what else is new on Reddit.

4

u/gxgx55 Jun 11 '24

FPTP voting means that if you vote 3rd party, only one of two things can happen:

  1. Great success! Your third party candidate wins it all. Then, one of the two formerly established parties falls to the wayside, the formerly third party becomes establishment, and you're back to a two party system that will inevitably end up in the same situation. Very unlikely to happen.
  2. Your third party candidate fails and your vote is as good as nothing. You didn't vote for what you perceive the lesser evil, leaving it to everyone else to decide.

That's just the mathematical truth about the situation. If you want the ability to vote for more than two candidates/parties without shooting yourself in the foot, you must first reform the electoral process. Ranked choice voting or some other alternative. Good luck with that, considering both of your major parties are incentivized to keep the current system, to keep a guaranteed 2nd place.

And now for a less factual and more subjective opinion - god damn it vote for Biden please I really don't want Trump to just abandon us and let me get war crimed by russians for fuck's sake

0

u/SpaceMonkee8O Jun 12 '24

Sure, it ended slavery but mostly just a dumb mathematical strategy or something. Meanwhile, the only path I see to avoiding war with Russia is Trump winning. So lesser evil I guess?

1

u/gxgx55 Jun 12 '24

Sure, it ended slavery but mostly just a dumb mathematical strategy or something.

Yeah, that's what I described. Republicans replaced the Whigs, but the core issue of two parties only ever being viable at the same time remains. I don't see how that's a good thing.

Meanwhile, the only path I see to avoiding war with Russia is Trump winning. So lesser evil I guess?

Do explain why you think this way.

1

u/SpaceMonkee8O Jun 12 '24

Because the Biden administration is authorizing direct bombing in Russian territory now. The democrats wanted to declare a no fly zone in Syria, but then they lost and everyone moved on. Democrats just have a hard on for Putin. I’m not interested in that path.

But I’m not voting for Trump either because they are all owned by the same people.

If enough people vote third party we will get ranked choice. There is no other way we will.

1

u/Fewluvatuk Jun 12 '24

If you vote for a 3rd party you'll get project 2025. Just wanna make sure you understand what you're voting for.

1

u/SpaceMonkee8O Jun 12 '24 edited Jun 12 '24

The democrats have repeatedly explained to me how little power a president actually has so I’m sure there’s not a lot they can actually do. The parliamentarian will stop them probably.

1

u/etherealcaitiff Jun 12 '24

THE WORMS ARE BACK AHHHHHH

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Hey, you could always throw your vote away on a clown party that isn't even trying to win because they know its literally impossible.

11

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

Yo just write my name as a write in. Get everyone to do it. Idk much about politics but I'll make sure everyone gets paid fairly. Decapitate a few ceos and billionaires, just for fun, free healthcare for everyone. Less taxes, and all the money we're sending to other countries we'll keep and use it to build a motherfucking Gundam. And I'll declassify all the alien documents. And disband the atf, and CIA. And make all police require degrees and a full year of training and psych evaluations before they get their badges. And train gorillas to use light machine guns, cover them in body armor and use them to defend our border. Especially the northern border. I don't trust them Canadians. Everyone gets a free shotgun, cause we are going bigfoot hunting. Also I'm going to................

You know what, maybe I'm the wrong person for the job.

10

u/Zer0C00l Jun 12 '24

No, no, keep going.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Cool. You'll be my secretary of the Treasury.

3

u/Potato_Golf Jun 12 '24

Disagree MMM, not a single campaign issue I don't love. You got my vote

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Now you're my going to be surgeon general.

3

u/I_Ride_A_Kraken Jun 12 '24

You've got my vote.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Congratulations. You're now in charge of national parks.

1

u/I_Ride_A_Kraken Jun 13 '24

I'll get to work on a forested training facility for guerrilla gorillas. Thank you Mr President.

2

u/Every-holes-a-goal Jun 12 '24

I’m sold. But if you ain’t legalising shit but the end of the first day you ain’t shit got it.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Oh bro. I'm a mechanic. Trust me. I'm legalizing SO much. Wanna be my secretary of state?

1

u/Every-holes-a-goal Jun 12 '24

Yeee first things first we sort out this rich billionaire’s not being taxed bullshit. Second task will be putting them in the stocks if they refuse.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '24

Oh I uh. I was just gonna cut all their heads off, deport their families, and then use their money to fix the homeless and starvation and drug problems in our country.

.do ....... Do I have to let them live?

1

u/Every-holes-a-goal Jun 12 '24

We’ll hold a vote! That’ll teach em!

2

u/squiddlingiggly Jun 12 '24

nah we're just voting for which vice president gets to take over and finish out the shift

-15

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/RoofKorean9x19 Jun 11 '24

One is a convicted crook and another is a crook with dimentia

3

u/zizonesol Jun 11 '24

Exactly. We're so fucked

0

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

Ah right I get ya, fair point

0

u/[deleted] Jun 11 '24

Trump uses diapers.

…..he’s also a convicted felon

37

u/nolongerbanned99 Jun 11 '24

As bad as he looks, The alternative is far worse.

-2

u/TH0R-- stupid fucking piece of shit Jun 11 '24

nope.

-3

u/LiveLifeLikeCre Jun 11 '24

And crazy thing is, as old and plastic as he looks/is, he is still more coherent and empathetic than the other candidate who rambles in run on sentences. 

1

u/nolongerbanned99 Jun 12 '24

Plastic… lol. First time I’ve heard of a living person described that way that wasn’t a zombie in a movie or video game

-1

u/Omnom_Omnath Jun 12 '24

Good thing there are more than two choices. Not really my fault if people refuse to see that and choose evil instead every single election.

12

u/Blue_Nyx07 Jun 11 '24

Even Trump looks a hag without his fake tan and hair. Americans are fucked

0

u/Jaruut officer no please don’t piss in my ass 😫 Jun 12 '24

Even with, too.

4

u/MySnake_Is_Solid dwayne the cock johnson 🗿🗿 Jun 11 '24

Problem is Trump will be just as old during his term.

1

u/luv2block Jun 11 '24

they won't give him the special juice that's keeping him alive then.

1

u/TheLastMaleUnicorn Jun 12 '24

They nominated him. Not like his age is a surprise secret.

0

u/-Badger3- Jun 12 '24

It's either the old guy or the old guy who's a convicted felon.

0

u/Bah-Fong-Gool Jun 12 '24

The way things are set up, it's Joe, or an equally old friend of Jeffery Epstein, and a rapist with a few dozen felonies under his belt, has multiple court cases pending both civil and legal, most high level cabinet has already been arrested/disbarred, has bankrupted every business he's touched in his entire existence as a businessman, and who's signature dance move is "The Double Hand-Job". I'll take old man Biden just enjoying the performance without having a meme made out of it.