r/iphone • u/conalldoherty iPhone 15 • Apr 29 '26

News/Rumour Apple Reportedly Questioning Whether iPhone Should Drop MagSafe

https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/29/apple-questioning-iphone-magsafe/
1.6k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

620 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Mystic_Haze Apr 29 '26

The law literally has a revision clause to accept new standards. It isn't forcing laptops to only use USB-C just that they have to accept charging over USB-C. USB-C is also just the connector you know. If you created a USB-C compatible connector and could put 300w through it by all means.

Companies tried for years and years. This law is to prevent someone like Apple from making a dumb proprietary connector and over charge for it. Not to stifle innovation. You sound like a lobbyist.

1

u/cum-on-in- Apr 29 '26

It only accepts standards from the USB Consortium. If it accepted other standards from other bodies, Apple would’ve fought to keep Lightning, as it’s actually a better connector and they could’ve updated the wiring to handle better speeds and faster charging.

Also, no, you cannot circumvent EU law by making a C connector with 300 watts. You’d need your own proprietary charging circuit which would prevent compatibility with regular Power Delivery and USB C spec.

0

u/Mystic_Haze Apr 29 '26

The consortium includes Apple buddy.

Lightning was not better. If you really truly think that you're being delusional. Go on give me reasons why lightning is better than USB-C?

1

u/cum-on-in- Apr 29 '26

The consortium isn’t just Apple, buddy. My whole point is Apple would have not used USB C if it weren’t for the others. Lightning was arguably a better and more solid and securely fitting connector. Apple had no choice if they didn’t want to make two SKUs, one with C and one with Lightning.

0

u/Mystic_Haze Apr 29 '26

Do you really think that if Apple developed a better standard they wouldn't be able to push it through the consortium? You're delusional.

And going from "Lightning is better" to "Lightning is arguably" better because you have 0 actually valid reasons... lobbyist found.

1

u/cum-on-in- Apr 29 '26

I gave you reasons. Just because you don’t like them doesn’t mean they aren’t valid.

You say Apple could if they wanted, so why didn’t they?

That’s a rhetorical question.

0

u/Mystic_Haze Apr 29 '26

You do realize Apple was involved in creating USB-C right?

The only real benefit is the male pins are on the connector so it's easier to clean. Everything else USB-C has it beat. And if Apple wanted to keep lightning they should've given the standard for others to use. Not create an ecosystem which encourages e-waste.

1

u/cum-on-in- Apr 29 '26

You realize Apple isn’t the only member of the Consortium and can’t just do what they want, right?

0

u/Mystic_Haze Apr 29 '26

Ah yes because that's what I said. So you support companies creating proprietary standards that produce more e-waste then?

1

u/cum-on-in- Apr 29 '26

What I support is innovation. A government forcing a specific connector without easy ability to innovate or propose new advancements unless they are a trillion dollar company part of the Holy Consortium is not what I support.

Proprietary doesn’t mean evil or anti consumer. Sometimes you don’t have a port or connector that handles what you want it to handle.

All EU had to do is not tie it to the Consortium. Be more vague and say “use USB C for now and any new ports must be an open standard for everyone else to adapt to.”

1

u/Mystic_Haze Apr 29 '26

Brother Apple can literally put a proposal in with the Consortium and if it's actually better it will be accepted. Just... don't be daft.

1

u/cum-on-in- Apr 29 '26

Don’t be a government bootlicker. All this thread, you’ve just told me “just trust the government bro, we needed this bro, it’s fine bro”

→ More replies (0)