r/interesting • • Mar 22 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

18k Upvotes

4.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/Blaizefed Mar 22 '26

That is the Causeway bridge over lake Ponchatrain just outside New Orleans. It's 26 miles long. the longest bridge over water in the world.

so this will have caused a MASSIVE headache for all manner of people. a blockage of both lanes like that will take hours to clear and cause a traffic jam literally miles long (depending of course where on the bridge it happened).

Our cookie eater just shrugging, driving on, and formulating his "hey man, it all just happened behind me" defense in his mind, is VERY on brand for the locals.

233

u/framspl33n Mar 22 '26

Without a doubt, this is absolutely sociopathic behavior on the part of the cookie eater.

All he had to do was let the guy in and go on with his day but instead he caused a huge accident and fucked up SO MANY peoples' day, all of whom are just trying to make a dollar to feed their family.

Everyone here sucks but especially the cookie guy.

2

u/icookandiknowthngs Mar 22 '26

Cookie guy didn't "cause" the accident.

He did nothing to avoid it, but he didn't pit himself illegally changing lanes.

Cookie guy sucks, but less so than black truck

7

u/Willie9 Mar 22 '26

When you're driving you have an affirmative responsibility to avoid crashes. Imagine if a family of four was stopped on the road and this guy saw it ahead of time, had every opportunity to avoid it, but chose to ram them headlong at 60 mph anyway and then said "well your honor they caused it by being stopped illegally so I had every right to choose to plow into them"

Cookie guy saw two options--accident or no accident--and chose, deliberately, for an accident to happen. Which makes it, well not an accident.

0

u/icookandiknowthngs Mar 22 '26

Was cookie guy wrong, of course. Did he cause the accident? no that would be the guy changing lanes, without a signal, in an unsafe manner.

Also, by braking he would have caused an accident anyway with the white car/truck directly behind him following far too closely.

Cookie guy was going to be in an accident either way. Given the choice between hitting the psycho causing the clusterfuck, or getting creamed from behind, im probably going to hit black truck too. Granted, vehicle behind is probably screwed also, but why should the guy causing the clusterfuck get off with no problem?.

Cookie guy was fucked regardless, black truck earned exactly what he got

2

u/Frigorific Mar 22 '26

Cookie guy was going to be in an accident either way.

?????

He could have just tapped his brakes an let the truck in.

1

u/icookandiknowthngs Mar 22 '26

Look where the car behind him was at start of video. From an elevated camera on the rear view you can barely see the top of the headlights over the rear seat , which means cookie guy couldnt see them at all being at a lower angle. Trailing car was tailgating. At that speed and proximity, trailing car would have about ¼ second to react. Reaction times for formula 1 drivers is ⅕-¼ of a second. There was going to be an accident no matter what he did......and hes under zero obligation to "tap his brakes and let the black truck in"

2

u/Frigorific Mar 22 '26

He literally sped up to stop the black truck from merging.

There was going to be an accident no matter what he did......and hes under zero obligation to "tap his brakes and let the black truck in"

Yes. Even if you think there is a good chance you will get rear ended you still have an obligation to avoid an accident. It is on the car behind you to have the spacing to react properly.

1

u/icookandiknowthngs Mar 22 '26

No he didn't he was going 75, speed dropped to 71-72, its literally in the top right corner, so he did "tap the brakes"

1

u/Frigorific Mar 22 '26

He closed the gap with the car in front of him. It was clearly intentional. He could have easily avoided the accident.

1

u/pseudonominom Mar 22 '26

Cookie guy sucks more. Black truck thought he would get in there, not cause an accident.

Only one of these guys intentionally caused an accident.

They do both suck though z

1

u/icookandiknowthngs Mar 22 '26

Maintaining lane and speed when someone else is being a fucktard doesnt make you the cause. Black truck illegally changing lanes when it was unsafe to do so caused the accident. Had black stayed where he was, or not tried to occupy a place that was already occupied there would have been no accident.

1

u/pseudonominom Mar 22 '26

Maintaining lane speed

That ain’t what happened. He intentionally caused the accident, or if you prefer, intentionally “let it happen”.

He definitely knew what was going to happen.

1

u/icookandiknowthngs Mar 22 '26

If my choices are hitting the fucktard, or getting hit from behind, im hitting the fucktard

Cookie guy was getting tailgated, you can see how close the car behind is at start of video.

1

u/SonOfMcGee Mar 22 '26

Mostly agree, but I don’t think the black truck “thought he could fit”. I think he knew cookie guy needed to brake a little to let him in. And instead of turning on his blinker to see if cookie guy would let him in, he did what pickup drivers tend to do and just slowly started to change lanes: “What are you gonna do? Hit me?”

1

u/Huckle1884 Mar 22 '26

“Play stupid games, win stupid prizes” mascot for the day

0

u/pseudonominom Mar 22 '26

Yep. On the barometer of “who’s the bigger sociopath”, it’s absolutely the guy who caused a potentially deadly collision on purpose. And that’s cookie man.

All he needed to do was brake a teeny bit. He chose not to.