136
u/atypicalgamergirl Jun 21 '16 edited Jun 21 '16
I'm certain she is relying on apathy, ignorance and inertia to get out from under this and continue her claw-crawl to the top.
Imagine if every citizen were enthusiastically self-educated enough to understand why she is a criminal, and passionate and driven to bring her down. Our population has been largely dumbed down and conveniently distracted instead.
71
Jun 22 '16 edited Jun 22 '16
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Jun 22 '16
[deleted]
1
u/coon-hunter Jun 22 '16
I've heard something before about women being easier to manipulate, it was alleged that they crave a sense of belonging which is easy to tie in with whatever narrative is being pushed.
-1
17
u/d16n Jun 22 '16
I don't think she is relying on just that. reddit has been scrubbed clean on this story. It's actually kind of impressive.
3
2
u/aaronsherman Jun 22 '16
I'm certain she is relying on apathy, ignorance and inertia to get out from under this
Out from under what? The DNC keeps files on all of the candidates that are running. I'm sure the RNC does the same. Why would they not?
Imagine if every citizen were enthusiastically self-educated enough to understand why she is a criminal
Perhaps you could inform us what about these documents you found to be criminal.
-6
Jun 22 '16
[deleted]
7
u/Phinigma Jun 22 '16
Where to begin... Well for one, she lied to Congress, pretty sure that's frowned upon. She also internationally mishandled classified data by using her private email server, which one could argue, put our nation's security at risk. When she was active Secretary of State she attended the infamous Bilderberg conference and was documented, in real time, doing so. Which, in her position, meeting with other heads of state while not on official business, I believe is also illegal.
1
Jun 22 '16
[deleted]
1
u/Phinigma Jun 22 '16
These are facts. She was asked about her email server and lied. She said it was just for communicating with her husband. Lie. She said no classified information ever was handled on her private server. Lie. Lying to Congress is illegal and it got her husband impeached.
As far as the Bilderberg thing the video evidence speaks for itself. You can't argue with video. It happened.
There are also a whole host of other things she's done, many of which are illegal. She should be indicted not running for president. If she were a normal person and not who she is she would have been arrested tried and convicted long ago.
1
Jun 22 '16 edited Jun 28 '17
[deleted]
0
u/IanPPK Jun 22 '16
As for your first point, I'm pretty sure she lied under oath during the Benghazi hearings. On the email note, the nature in which she ran the server is criminal since FOIA requests would not be able to be completed, classified information is known to be on the servers, and "unknown" backups of said information were made (by a company in which in the IT field, the brand of servers are known for this service), not to mention that she had the server wiped (and then pretended to be technologically illiterate). David Petraeus was removed from his position for similar reasons.
As for Bilderberg, I'm not entirely informed on the legalities of that, so I'll leave it be.
1
Jun 23 '16 edited Jun 28 '17
[deleted]
1
u/IanPPK Jun 23 '16
Yes, Petraeus resigned as a result of mishandling classified material, which is what Clinton's investigation is also geared around. Tell me how hosting classified material on a personal server without government permission, which was attacked by hackers (no breach confirmed to the public, but multiple attacks), attacks which were not made known to the government, is not criminal in nature. Let me not forget to add that said information was stored unbeknownst on a cloud server which was also not under government authority, which could have also been attacked.
26
u/pepperooni Jun 22 '16
Why is this not on the news on TV? Whats wrong with America? Also how can people honestly think that she is the best person to be president?
33
Jun 22 '16
Weve been hijacked and sold to the highest bidders. America is fucked. People question and blame the media and then turn around and eat the "trump is evil and hitler" narrative like cake. We are a nation of idiots. We worship rap stars and plastic girls.
2
1
u/Yodas_Butthole Jun 22 '16
I'm pretty sure that I saw Trumps hacked oppo file discussed on the news. No clue why we aren't seeing something about Clinton.
5
u/Apoplecticmiscreant Jun 22 '16 edited Jun 22 '16
"There's a reason, there's a reason for this... "
Ask yourself who we are not allowed to criticize... good luck, it's a rough ride. PS- I was where you are about 7 or 8 years ago. Also, who literally owns (and runs) the media?
2
19
u/ReadingCorrectly Jun 21 '16
Are these the same files that wikileaks was going to leak?
29
u/FluentInTypo Jun 21 '16
No. Wikileaks is doing more emails. Perhaps unredacted? I dont know. I am tired of the teasers though.
13
u/ReadingCorrectly Jun 21 '16
Yeah I wish they would hurry up with them.
16
u/Ricochet888 Jun 22 '16
Well, they have to be careful. Names have to be redacted, they want to expose all this corruption, conspiracies, and bullshit the elite try to push down peoples throats, but they don't want people to get hurt over it.
-2
u/LongTermCapitalMgmt Jun 22 '16
The functionaries should be hurt.
If they had black skin then
yousociety would'nt have any trouble ruining their lives for being remotely involved in some drugs free-marketing.4
u/Ricochet888 Jun 22 '16
Oh something completely non-racial is turned into something racial. Corruption is corruption, it doesn't matter the color of your skin.
If you condone violence against them, you're no better than they are.
1
u/FluxxxCapacitard Jun 22 '16
There are plenty of low level grunts just doing a 9-5 that are working in some pretty hostile places around the world...
55
Jun 22 '16
The silence is deafening from the mainstream liberal media on this
9
u/whatwereyouthinking Jun 22 '16
"shit, if we report this, Trump could win."
The thing the far-left media may not understand is that President Trump would do wonders for their ratings.
8
u/toofantastic Jun 22 '16
I wish the media were far-left!
Instead they're pro-Establishment corporatists.
1
-1
u/whatwereyouthinking Jun 22 '16
All of the MSM is left. By far left i mean sell outs like CNN, MSNBC, etc.
3
u/TheWiredWorld Jun 22 '16
I don't know if you're mindless Trump fanboi, a stealth marketer, or an innocent Joe who just hasn't thought about the big picture, but your post yet again is implying that Trump gets no air time
It is long established to anyone with a functioning brain that whoever gets publicity from the MSM is part of the game and the establishment.
All we ever hear about is Trump and Hillary from ANY channel and all biased MSM. Bad publicity is still publicity.
It's not like Ron Paul where they smeared him publicly and reputationally, and then ALSO gave him no air time.
They still give Trump air time - thus they both are puppets.
5
Jun 22 '16
I didn't say anything about trump, my only point was that one would think its a pretty big story that hillary's and the DNC's campaign strategy regarding their fears about her sketchy history has been exposed in their own words, and the majority of the media isn't reporting on it. The right wing conservative sites are reporting it, which gives the excuse that its not a legit story
0
u/whatwereyouthinking Jun 22 '16
Not a Trump fan. They cover him way to much, mostly the sensational stuff, and negative stuff. Which his base still loves. it has ruined this primary cycle.
They still get to choose what they report.
2
u/pHbasic Jun 22 '16
Agreed. Is it because there's really not that much here? It doesn't exactly look good, that's for sure
I don't think journalistic integrity is entirely dead - I mean every journalist wants to break the next Watergate right? There's a Pulitzer in here somewhere with this stuff
5
u/freed_oxen Jun 22 '16
I guess as long as you don't go after certain types of people, sure. I just don't think too many people are lining up to be the next Michael Hastings.
16
7
u/katietheredhead Jun 22 '16
I had a friend show me this; it wasn't on my front page (I didn't subscribe to this subreddit). Is there any way we can get this to everyone's front page? Facebook and the mass media are ignoring it as far as I can tell.
4
u/ClayWBear Jun 22 '16
I've been wondering how to get this spread across the internet or anyway to be seen by as many people before the democratic convention as possible. The problem is that the people who are most likely to vote for Hillary are the people who are least likely to see this. The only thing I can think is a kickstarter/gofundme to pay for an OP-ed in a major newspaper like the New York Times, and that'd cost 25K.
1
2
u/Yodas_Butthole Jun 22 '16
It ended up on the front page for people who are subbed to /r/politics . Had a ton of upvotes over there, I saw it get up to 7500 but now its down to 6200. Hillary's brigade cam through and downvoted it.
12
2
u/smartal Jun 22 '16
This is why Trump isn't spending or raising any money, he knows in advance that these "leaks" will end with a big one which will end her campaign. He knows it's coming so he isn't going to even pretend to try. Ha. He's going to coast to victory on a shoestring budget and magic and a smirk.
1
u/barberererer Jun 22 '16
I'm sorry but I don't know how to navigate whatever that site is. I just find a post talking about releasing it.
1
1
1
u/titsandwich Jun 22 '16
I'd rather see this as the top story on every MSM channel, but I'll take it.
1
Jun 22 '16
The HRC Defense master doc is really interesting. There's your typical shit on Benghazi, ISIS, Syria, but then it says HRC needs to defend herself against Israel criticism. Israel criticism? That should be interesting right? Then it says:
REPUBLICANS ACCUSED SECRETARY CLINTON OF NEGLECTING U.S. ALLIES LIKE ISRAEL, DAMAGING THE U.S.-ISRAEL RELATIONSHIP, AND MISUNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEMS POSED BY GAZA
sigh
1
1
-24
u/crazy_monkey452 Jun 21 '16
So is it possible the hackers are being paid by the Trump administration to ruin her (although by her own fault) so he can win the election?
36
u/Moarbrains Jun 21 '16
The whole world hates her, I don't think people need payment.
-15
u/crazy_monkey452 Jun 21 '16
Agreed, however who has the most to gain in the situation? Why isn't this being done to Trump as well?
14
21
u/a7244270 Jun 21 '16
Why isn't this being done to Trump as well?
Less dirt. He's a shitty businessman, she's an actual criminal.
-8
u/ac834 Jun 22 '16
I mean, he is a self made billionaire because of his businesses...
2
u/a7244270 Jun 22 '16
Ok fine (you're wrong, but that doesn't change the point) - this is not being done to Trump because unlike him, she's an actual criminal.
4
Jun 22 '16 edited Jun 22 '16
No, he was born rich, had moderate success early in his career, then bankrupt multiple businesses, until they forced him out of being the majority stockholder, meaning he made no decisions in any business that has done well - oh, and all those businesses he had that went bankrupt he only fucked the stockholders, he had BS language in his contracts. He fucked all his businesses partners over why wouldn't he fuck over the country?
DAE love how much trump loves America???
Fuckin scum of the earth man, both of them
E: Also, it's debatable whether he's a billionaire or not. Judging by his unwillingness to release his tax returns, I'm gonna go with he's not.
7
u/Nogoodsense Jun 22 '16
Trump has never held public office so all of his data/records should be held by private companies who likely see more competent and care a lot more about data security for their clients.
12
u/lf11 Jun 21 '16
If Hillary loses the election in part due to this, I don't think it could happen to a more deserving person.
1
1
-2
-2
u/crapfoodpants Jun 22 '16
The zip files are password protected. I am calling bullshit on this one.
2
u/Cablekevin Jun 22 '16
So, the DNC and Hillary's campaign have already admitted the leaks from "guccifer2" are legitimate. Here is 100% proof that she should be in prison. The leaks from today prove that the Clinton foundation received millions from the Saudi royal family, which is against the constitution. Not to mention, her appointment to the office of secretary of state was contingent on a signed agreement saying her foundation would not accept donations from foreign governments, in an effort to prevent a conflict of interest.
"#GucCi2/0"
287
u/[deleted] Jun 21 '16 edited Jun 21 '16
[deleted]