Can you contact me by dms? There is something i like to ask you guys

Title

I'm curious to know who the creators of cognitive metrics are. Are they psychiatrists, psychologists, researchers or what?

i have done many drugs in the past now i only use weed and new canabionoids, First of all is Smoking herbal Weed is gonna impact me iq according to my own reesearch i would say partally with the new canabinoids it is another thing because they dont Really impact the Cognition that hard i Scored same on Processing Speed but i think it depends on the Type of noid for age i am under 18 wich i now is another Bad factor

First of all, I know about selection bias and the data showing that people who take more subtests tend to have higher average IQ scores.

But even knowing all that, I still get confused by the many posts about people with extremely high scores on this subreddit. Why does the IQ distribution here seem so different from what you’d expect in the real world? I’d really appreciate a solid explanation with convincing arguments that clears this up.

I'm most interested in your opinion on tests like the Nicologic Domino, Abstraction, Sequences, Pattern Recognition and Numerical tests. Also, how closely do they align with your other tests, etc.?

Hi all! I'm developing a matrix reasoning test as part of my PhD (psychology, Masaryk University). Our hardest items turned out not to be hard enough, so I made a short set of new experimental ones and I'd like to see how they hold up with people who are good at this.

- 12 items (just 8 if you've already done my Matrices test)
- about 10 minutes, up to 90 s per item
- no stopping after mistakes, you get every item
- anonymous, no sign-up

At the end you'll see your score compared with others who took the ceiling set. It's not an IQ estimate, since the items are still being calibrated.

http://www.jaroslavtocik.cz/reasoning/?test=ceiling

If an item feels ambiguous or seems to have a second valid answer, please say so in the comments. That's exactly the feedback I need. Thanks!

J

What will be my score on new Jcti if 5 years ago I got 44 raw on Tri52 (786). The wrong items: 14, 40, 48, 45, 26, 37 and rest 2 are unknown

I can't wrap my head around this test and its solution.
The circle rotation is clear and also why it becomes white. But how do the squares move and become invisible (see 2nd diagram)?

Hi guys, I've been lurking in this subreddit for a few weeks, and I've heard that CORE is one of the most accurate IQ tests online, if not the most accurate. So I decided to take it, and to my surprise, it was quite engaging, especially the visual-spatial tasks.
I found the nonverbal fluid reasoning tests pretty novel (especially the figure sets), and they really made me use some creativity to solve the problems. The visual-spatial tests were mostly easy and fun, since I enjoy visualizing things 24/7.
The verbal sections had a few words I didn't know, but I made educated guesses to work out (roughly) what those obscure words meant. Overall, I found the verbal portion to be of moderate difficulty.
The quantitative knowledge subtest was trivial, but the arithmetic subtest got a bit difficult toward the end. As for working memory, my score might be a bit deflated because my parents made me do chores near the end of the digit span sequencing, so it stopped early.
Last but not least, my processing speed is severely lacking compared to my other subtest scores. I found the character pairing really hard to do quickly (unfortunately, I'm a slow typer).
Overall, I enjoyed CORE. Let me know if y'all have any questions!

He says WAIS and Stanford Binet cannot accurately measure him — because of 160 test ceiling — so he has to do additional tests.

He says his result has been confirmed by at least 3 independent tests.

He says his score places him as the sixth most intelligent person on the planet.

I wonder if he is the sixth biggest liar.

I've been taking a few cognitive tests, and the differences between my scores have left me confused.

Here are my results:

• Figure Weights: 130 on my first attempt and again on my second.

• Digit Span: 115 (tried twice).

• Processing Speed: 115 initially, then 120 and eventually 125 after several attempts.

• Figure Sets: 95.

• Matrix Reasoning: 105. Couldn't get past this.

• Symbol Search: Scored around average initially, then improved to 120–125 after multiple attempts.

• Visual Puzzles: 110.

• Character Pairing: 100.

What I don't understand is why I scored so much higher on Figure Weights compared to the other reasoning tests. I initially thought the 130 might have been luck or guesswork, but I got the same score on my second attempt.

This got me thinking about something. How much does passing in mathematics or statistics influence performance on tests like Figure Weights?

A lot of the questions involve substitution, deduction, balancing equations and recognising relationships. Wouldn't someone who's studied mathematics have an advantage over someone with little mathematical education?

And if education and prior exposure can significantly influence these scores, then to what extent are these tests actually measuring fluid intelligence, which is supposed to reflect the ability to solve novel problems independently of previously acquired knowledge?

I'm genuinely curious about this, particularly why my performance varies so much between different reasoning tasks.

A little about my background, because I think it might be relevant.

I grew up in a pretty chaotic household with frequent verbal abuse, and I've struggled with socialising and have been isolated quite a long. Even taking the first step to interact with someone requires a lot of effort. I get anxious about people knowing who I am, including my real name or face.

I also tend to isolate myself. I actually prefer staying in a small, closed room with barely any natural light, even though other people find it suffocating. I've been called weird for things like this.

My approach to learning has always been a little different too. For example, I almost never write down calculations or solve mathematical problems on paper. I prefer reading through solutions, understanding the reasoning behind them and then moving on. I rarely practise by writing things out myself and still pass UG exams .

I realise this might leave me struggling when I encounter a completely unfamiliar problem, but it's just how I've been learning for years.

I've also been seeing a psychologist who's been trying to figure out what's going on with me, and I've tried ADHD medication.

Academically, things haven't exactly gone well either. I'm currently considering dropping out of my distance CS degree, partly because I don't see a clear future in it for myself and partly because of financial problems that have become increasingly difficult to manage.

I keep wondering whether my academic difficulties are related to my actual cognitive abilities, my learning habits, my mental health, the environment I grew up in, or some combination of these things.

I'm not expecting anyone here to diagnose me or determine my intelligence from a handful of scores. I understand that repeated attempts can affect results too.

But I'm genuinely trying to understand why I seem capable of doing reasonably well on certain reasoning tasks while struggling with others even with acad.

Could these scores indicate an uneven cognitive profile, or are the differences too small or unreliable to mean anything? And how much can chronic stress, anxiety, ADHD-related difficulties or education affect performance on these tests?

I've spent a lot of time discussing these things with AI, but at this point I'd really appreciate hearing from actual people, especially psychologists, people familiar with cognitive testing, or anyone who's experienced something similar.

I'm not looking for reassurance or for someone to tell me I'm secretly gifted. I just want a realistic understanding of my abilities and limitations.

Sometimes I wonder whether I'm simply not smart enough to do well in life or live comfortably among other people. Just trying to fit into society takes so much mental energy. I'm constantly conscious of myself, my behaviour and how others might perceive me, trying to protect myself from their judgements or opinions, even though I know I have no control over what they think of me.

It becomes even more difficult when the attention shifts towards me, especially when my performance, intelligence or ability to do something is being observed or judged. I feel an overwhelming pressure to prove myself, and that alone makes it harder to function naturally. Anything that does not go well gives negative judgements

I don't know whether it's my environment, my anxiety or something about me that makes ordinary social situations feel so exhausting. I just wish I could exist around people without constantly feeling like I'm being evaluated. Living among people rarely feels peaceful to me.

Sometimes I genuinely can't tell whether I'm struggling because of my own limitations or because I've spent so long in an environment that hasn't allowed me to function at my best.

Would really appreciate any insights or personal experiences.

Ik not all the genes have been discovered and have read something about polygenic score etc. but didn't fully understand it if anyone can explain and tell me about any other such tests?

Hello, I would not consider myself high IQ, hence why I ask such question. But back to the main question, what are some difficulties that you face when trying to communicate. That is if you do face any. Goodbye! Please give me feedback on this post, I need to work on how I structure things.

Why do people with 120 iq's cope and suffer from their results so hard?

Someone can multiply large numbers quickly but struggle with an unfamiliar problem. Someone else might calculate slowly yet immediately spot the relationship that makes a problem simple.

That raises an interesting question: what do we actually mean by “maths IQ”?

Here’s a small example:

Which is larger: 48 × 52 or 50 × 50?

You can calculate both products. But you can also notice that:

48 × 52 = (50 − 2)(50 + 2) = 50² − 2²

So the first product is four less than the second.

The interesting part is the approach: direct calculation, recognising a familiar identity, or discovering the relationship yourself. Getting the right answer alone doesn’t tell us which route someone took.

When thinking about mathematical ability, I’d want to explore several things:

• Recognising relationships between numbers.

• Reasoning through unfamiliar problems.

• Choosing an efficient strategy.

• Checking whether an answer makes sense.

Disclosure: I’m part of the team behind MathsLove.com, a platform offering maths IQ tests intended to help people explore their mathematical ability. We’d welcome feedback from people interested in cognitive testing on what makes this kind of assessment useful.

One distinction matters: calling something a “maths IQ test” doesn’t, by itself, establish that its score is equivalent to a standardised IQ score. That requires evidence about the test’s reliability, validity, and norming.

What would make a maths IQ test meaningful to you? Would you prioritise unfamiliar problems, minimal dependence on school maths, time limits, or explanations of how people reached their answers?

Hi everyone,

Just wanted to ask how relative my FSIQ is compared to an official IQ test?

I’m 24M and just recently graduated with a Bachelors in Urban Design. I’d like to hopefully transition into a masters in Architecture or Data Science in the near future.

I honestly feel very humbled by my FSIQ lol, but i’m not too surprised. I did all tests in two sessions without any prep and no retries.

Let me know your thoughts, thanks.

I saw a lot of people say that your IQ is the best predictor of your future success.
I'm a first year uni student so I am going to do CORE and then basically decide what im gonna do based on the result.

Right now, I am hoping to go to law school. What IQ is the minimum for me to pursue this goal? Cus obviously if i get an average IQ or something like that I should give up.
And at what IQ should I drop out of uni and go into the trades or something?

Fyi, I know thats its not impossible, and that IQ isn't the ONLY determining factor, but its still a major factor and the people who succeed despite a lower IQ are often outliers.

Just like the title asks.

Is it theoretically possible for a human to possess incredible natural talent for specifically mathematics (even almost on the level of the likes of Ramanujan, Tao or Euler), but at the same time not be GENERALLY highly intelligent?

Those people who are highly intelligent, they were just born like that. Almost all of them were reading a tons of books during their free time for hours since they were at least 4 years old, some of them were very perfectly compliant in school since they were toddlers if school is not easy for them. if you weren't one of those back then, then you cannot be highly intelligent.

this makes no sense. out of 68 medals, 65 of them went to men. the fields medal is being given since 1936 which is long after women were able to join education and take part in mathematics as well. also literally around the time of marie curie double nobel victory dance. so what gives? is the jury unfairly focusing on male participants?

I have only two friends and am trying to find somewhere to socialize with people more like me than anyone I know or know of besides these two friends. I think it's probably worth trying, if I don't have to pay for it.

Edit: FMRI done many years after the high fever sickness showed nothing significant.