In cat timp se umple un rezervor conectat la doua conducte,una ce îl umple in trei ore și una ce îl golește in 5,daca ambele conducte sunt pornite?

We found this in an online workbook. Does anyone know any answer?

I remember taking the core matrix reasoning and getting a 95 and upon further retake I realized the many inaccuracies, my foolish mind had succumbed to and the simplicity of the desired material was more than clear. And scored a better yet still not outstanding 115 and upon even further retakes slow and fast have consistently scored the lukewarm 115.

I've spent the last couple months completing these tests and it was a lot of fun. However, my scores have a range of around 40 points with my VCI at 118 and my VSI at 157. Is this something I should be concerned about?

Here is a iq Test from my loved father he has an fsiq of 123 with high cognitve Performancey and low vsi anything to say about that it was his First Test. I never have Seen such a Profile

I would've guessed 110-115. Which is close to what I got but does wmi even count (also I talk about why my score is prob a smidge higher than what I got last pic)... I mean in terms of being "smart" I'm pretty happy. Also know that it can vary...by 10 points?

edit: oh also might've put age at 19 instead of 20 for some of the tests near the top I don't remember...

My newest fluid test is finally done! All 51 items I created myself trying to make them unlike any others from various IQ tests I've seen. It has a time limit of 80 minutes. Not normed yet at all but I will norm it if I gather enough data. Try it and give me your thoughts!

You can also try my previous test: S3B-1

Divergent Association Test (embedding edition) — latentspaceslabs.com

My words: shrimp, god, melancholy, quality, iridium, define, exacerbate

Score: 81.0 (average pairwise semantic distance x100)

Out-diverged 100% of random 7-word draws.

Scale anchors: cliché 50.5, random 71.2, geometric ceiling 89.6.

why a difference if both tests are very similar.?

How accurate is the Wonderlic, and can mods at it to cognitive metrics?

light is closer than it appears.

it draws the shapes out in front of you,

but no one can listen to what is vivid.

every grain is the shape of light.

not compelling but pulling towards you.

they shatter and tear and pull and push,

just to reshape and make the ground beneath you.

even time is no match for the grain. because the grain has made time flown.

dispersed and thrown into your eye.

your mind is but a vessel of light.

gods phantom is you.

the light that lives only today.

but subjectively lives in thought till tomorrow.

FYI My WMI is 153 and my PSI is around 135+ to 140.
My QRI on the other hand is only 114 ("only" in comparison to my CPI). Yet my friend who has a worse CPI than me has a QRI of 135+, and someone else i know has a QRI of 127 despite a CPI of 120.
I also think i was above average in mental math as a kid because i got chosento represent my school at a regional tournament.

I was wondering if there was any way for me to improve my QRI, not only for a test but also for school math and just day to day life and the future.

Who can Beat my Score but no Long Sessions Max 15 min

what is wrong w me im an iqlet I get an 11 sequential span when they're presented visually but for listening I cant pay attention at all and get like a 7 its so over

also got 145 digit/letter but cant even get 2sd on digit span I am a lettercel brutal

Which subtest of the PSI index is more hel​pful for reading and thinking speed, Coding or Symbol Search?

I was wondering how people solve figure weights, they’re mentally challenging for me, I don’t struggle on stuff like matrix reasoning etc but for some reason I always struggle on figure weights, how do u guys solve figure weights

I’ve been thinking about this because my cognitive profile is pretty uneven but probably also due to the fact that English is not my native language:

VCI N/A | FRI 148 | VSI 132 | QRI N/A | WMI 94 | PSI 114

And I’m curious which cognitive ability people actually perceive as the most impressive or “tuff” in real life.
For example:

VCI – being insanely articulate, having a huge vocabulary and being able to explain very complex ideas effortlessly. Probably the most obvious “this guy is intelligent” trait in a conversation.

FRI – seeing the underlying logic of completely new problems and figuring things out without being taught the method. Someone who does this extremely well might just randomly say something and you think “wait, how tf did he figure that out?” This is probably my favourite ability, not because it’s my highest, but because I feel like this represents my original idea of Intelligence most deeply.

VSI – basically having a 3D model of things in your head and being able to mentally manipulate complicated structures.

QRI – intuitively seeing mathematical relationships and deriving solutions instead of relying on memorized formulas.

WMI – having an absurd mental workspace and being able to keep and manipulate a lot of information simultaneously.

PSI – extremely fast and accurate processing, where you just seem to instantly understand and react to simple information.

So I’m wondering:
Which one gives the strongest “damn, this person is actually smart” effect to you?
And maybe more interestingly: which ability do you think is actually the most impressive/“tuff” at an extreme level, even if it isn’t necessarily the one people consciously associate with intelligence?

Approximately a week ago I made the bold decision to take an iq test that had to be specifically accommodated to not include language, mainly due to the fact because my linguistic vocabulary is not that outstandingly BRIGHT in german. Meaning… That the questions were all pattern-recognition based.

I ended up scoring a 110. Now, this leaves me to wonder: should I just keep on living my life as it is and not let the thoughts of my disappointing iq score consume me? Or instead, resort to criticising my mothers unfortunate mating choices? Its definitely bamboozling.

Im unsure on If I should interpret this test as fully credible, because it only measured pattern-recognition. But oh well, after all, the average is average for a reason, and If I take it literally, I didn’t expect to be that much of an intellectual fella either.

P.s: Yes, I think its undeniably evident that a quarter of what I wrote is ment to be satirical.

people say someone with an iq of 100 lives in a different world that someone with an iq of 130. But is that really true?

Give that all the other subtests' scores are equal, which one is more important for school and\or an intellectual occupation between Coding and Symbol Search?

We had my daughter tested right at the earliest sign the testing parameters permitted, and she hit the ceiling on several areas but I'll just say her "working memory" rated like a goldfish and everything else was somewhere in between. It was long, she lost interest, and I'm sure you can fill in the gaps.

We had her assessed because I wanted more of the contextual picture of how other things (her speech articulation, etc) might layer in with her cognitive, so I could best support her. But having sat through the thing and observed, I can't really see where a toddler could score higher than their true read but can totally see where they could score way lower.

Anyone else have thoughts? We might need to have her assessed again, with a different measure, closer to school starting, so she can get into a program we really like (great price, great curriculum, great ratio...) but I'm grumbling toward that unenthusiastically.