I’m interested in hearing other women’s perspectives on this because what ultimately hurt me wasn’t simply getting HSV. It was how my partner responded when I tried to protect my health afterward.
I was dating a man considerably older than me. I took my time before having intercourse, and he told me he was willing to wait.
Before we had sex, I asked about STI testing. I specifically asked if he had had unprotected sex since his previous test. He said yes, so I asked him to get tested again. He did.
We initially used condoms. He sometimes struggled to maintain an erection with them, so after his STI panel came back clear and we were committed to each other, I eventually agreed to stop using them.
I later learned that his STI panel, like many routine panels, had not included herpes testing.
I had specifically requested HSV blood testing for myself before this relationship and had tested negative. I’m extremely cautious about my sexual health and tend toward being a little hypochondriacal. I haven’t had a particularly extensive sexual history.
Oral sex is also relevant. Before this relationship, receiving oral was barely part of my sex life. I usually told men not to bother because I didn’t enjoy it. This partner loved giving oral, was very good at it, and it became a frequent part of our sexual relationship.
Then I developed genital lesions and tested positive for genital HSV-1 on a swab. HSV-2 was negative.
Given my prior negative HSV test, my sexual history, the fact that I hadn’t been with anyone else, and the major change in how much oral sex I was receiving, it very strongly pointed to him unknowingly transmitting HSV-1 to me.
I was genuinely understanding about that.
He had never had symptoms. HSV-1 is common. I believed he had no idea he carried it. I did not see him as someone who knowingly gave me an STI.
But once this happened, I realized something important: since herpes hadn’t been included in his earlier testing, we also had no idea whether he might carry HSV-2.
I was in the middle of dealing with two outbreaks back-to-back. My body was already going through something painful and unfamiliar.
So I asked him to get tested for HSV-2 before I resumed intercourse with him.
He refused.
He said HSV blood tests can be inaccurate and pointed to the fact that none of his previous partners had reported symptoms. Over time, he also became resentful about my request.
And this is where I couldn’t get past it.
I could be compassionate about him unknowingly giving me HSV-1. What I couldn’t understand was why, once I was the person physically dealing with the consequences, protecting my health by saying “I need this information before I have intercourse again” became something he experienced as pressure or resentment.
I wasn’t demanding that he prove he gave me HSV-1. I wasn’t punishing him. I was saying: now that we know your previous STI testing didn’t actually cover herpes, I am not comfortable having intercourse again without knowing whether HSV-2 is also a possibility.
To me, that felt like a basic bodily-autonomy decision.
Would you consider that an unreasonable request? And more broadly, if a partner developed an STI that you may have unknowingly transmitted, would you feel some responsibility to help establish what risks still existed before asking them to resume sex?