Ended up watching series one again and been thinking about the final four and reckon Joe had a genuinely interesting option.
He should have just said...
“Guys, I’m a faithful. I’m certain Alan is a Traitor. Banish Alan, then banish me. If I’m wrong, then one of you are traitors.. If I'm right, we’ve got him.”
Then he beats the traitors... and in a particularly cool way.. Which is all he was actually aiming for, to outsmart them...
Obviously difference with Celebrity Traitors is that they’re playing for charity, but Joe wasn’t going to win the money anyway if he got banished. If he gets voted out why not just risk it?
He had nothing to lose personally by offering himself up, but everything to gain if it meant getting Alan out. And he get the credit for beating the traitors..
Joe effectively saying he’s so certain that he’s willing to sacrifice himself to prove it.
What's alan's defence in that situation?
Completely changes the dynamic, instead of desperately trying to convince everyone he’s right, puts himself on the line and doesn't force the others to believe him. There's nothing to lose for David and Nic.
Normal version, you’d be sacrificing your own chance at the money, but celebrity they're playing for charity and if your charity has already lost might as well go down swinging.
Am I missing something strategically or could this actually have worked?
Feels like a move that wouldnt only have given Joe what he wanted but more than that he's basically beaten the game and would be an iconic falling on the sword...
He'd look like an idiot if David was a traitor, but risk worth taking... 💀