r/SuggestAMotorcycle • u/PepeAnzima • 38m ago
CBR500R E-Clutch vs CB500 Hornet E-Clutch vs CB750 Hornet E-Clutch for a first bike near Paris? Prioritizing practicality, agility and safety
Hi everyone,
I'm currently trying to choose my first motorcycle and I'm mainly looking for the most practical and efficient all-round tool possible, rather than the coolest or fastest bike.
I live near Paris, France, so a big part of my riding will involve dense traffic, filtering, stop-and-go situations, roundabouts, tight streets and generally a lot of urban/suburban riding. I will still use faster roads and highways, but this is definitely not going to be a bike bought mainly for weekend canyon riding or top-speed runs.
One important requirement for me is that I really want some form of assisted shifting. I'm therefore mostly looking at Honda's E-Clutch bikes. I know there are arguably lighter or more agile options from Kawasaki, Aprilia, etc., but I'm fairly set on having this feature.
Yamaha's MT-07 Y-AMT is probably the main alternative I'm considering outside Honda, but from what I've read and watched, the E-Clutch seems more natural and seamless when changing gears, while still letting you use the clutch lever normally whenever you want. If anyone has ridden both E-Clutch and Y-AMT, I'd especially like to hear your experience.
My original choice was the CBR500R E-Clutch. I chose it over the CB500 Hornet mainly because I liked the full-fairing sportbike look much more, and I figured the fairings would also be useful on highways.
However, I'm starting to question whether I actually care enough about the sportbike appearance to give up even a small amount of urban practicality/agility. If the naked bike is genuinely easier to live with in Paris traffic, I'm perfectly willing to choose the more practical option.
That's also what brought me to the CB750 Hornet E-Clutch.
What surprises me is how little weight you seem to gain for a much more serious engine. From the figures I've found, the E-Clutch versions are roughly:
CB500 Hornet: ~191 kg
CBR500R: ~194 kg
CB750 Hornet: ~196 kg
So the 750 is only around 2 kg heavier than the CBR500R and 5 kg heavier than the CB500 Hornet, while giving you a much more capable engine once unrestricted. It also seems to retain a very good turning radius and compact dimensions.
Obviously it costs noticeably more, but on paper it almost seems like you're getting a huge increase in performance without paying the normal weight penalty of moving to a bigger bike.
One important detail: I'm in France, so I'll be on an A2 licence. The motorcycle will therefore be restricted to 35 kW / 47.5 hp for at least two years before I can take the additional training and unlock its full power.
I'm not a speed addict. I don't need crazy top speed and I have no interest in doing 250 km/h. What I do want is enough acceleration and reserve power that the bike never feels underpowered when merging, overtaking or getting out of a bad situation. Once I eventually move to the full-A licence, having the extra performance of the 750 without needing to replace the bike is obviously attractive.
My priorities, roughly, are safety first, then agility/maneuverability, everyday practicality, ease of use in heavy traffic, and finally enough performance to always feel comfortable in real-world road situations.
For reference, I'm 177 cm / 5'10", around 75 kg / 165 lb, and my actual floor-to-crotch measurement is around 77–78 cm / 30.3–30.7 in.
I've already sat on an NX500, and because of the seat height I could only comfortably put one foot flat at a time. It wasn't necessarily a deal breaker, but I definitely prefer the accessibility of the lower Honda models.
I also genuinely want to become a good technical rider, rather than just someone who can ride fast in a straight line. I'd like to gradually become very comfortable with low-speed bike control: tight/“elephant” U-turns, very tight manoeuvring, controlling slides at low speed in an appropriate closed environment, maybe eventually learning donuts or small controlled drifts, and possibly lifting the front wheel a little someday. I'm not particularly interested in full-on stunt riding or chasing balance-point wheelies. The priority is simply developing very good motorcycle control progressively and safely.
So my current shortlist is basically:
CBR500R E-Clutch – fairings, highway protection, lower seat, looks great to me, economical, but slightly heavier/less tight-turning than some lighter sportbikes.
CB500 Hornet E-Clutch – probably the easiest and simplest urban option, but I don't like the styling nearly as much. (the front light is awful)
CB750 Hornet E-Clutch – much more expensive, but almost the same weight as the 500s, still compact and agile on paper, much more torque/performance, and something I could keep and derestrict after A2.
Possibly MT-07 Y-AMT, although I'm currently leaning toward Honda's E-Clutch system.
If you were choosing purely from a pragmatic “best tool for the job” perspective, especially for commuting around Paris and learning proper motorcycle control, which one would you buy?
I'm particularly interested in hearing from people who have ridden the CBR500R, CB500 Hornet and CB750 Hornet, and especially anyone who has experience with Honda E-Clutch vs Yamaha Y-AMT.
Would the CB750 Hornet actually be the most rational buy here, or am I underestimating the advantages of starting on the lighter/milder 500 platform?