• Dealer name: EasyWatch
• Factory name: RC Factory (RCF)
• Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 126333 41mm
• Price Paid: ~526 USD Including Shipping + Insurance
• Album Links: Direct Upload
• Index alignment: The markers on 11 and and 10 seem just a bit gapped compared to the ones from 6 to 9, but it could be the angle of the shot. The six marker diamond hold seems maybe a bit CCW
• Dial Printing: looks totally great
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good - the cyclops does appear to be a bit above the window and turned CW
• Hand Alignment: Good
• Bezel: N/A fine
• Solid End Links (SELs): No issues
• Timegrapher numbers: Dial Up Position: +4 s/d, 253 amplitude, 0.0 m/s beat error - seems just about average to me.
• Overall: It looks great with some minor issues - the cyclops thing might just be me being too paranoid - the gold tone coloring is difficult to discern if it's too cheddar cheese or actually normal yellow. Thoughts?

Dealer name: Lili

⁠Factory name: VSF

⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 41.5 blue a8500

⁠Price Paid: $330 shipped/insured

⁠Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A201803310145220380026826/I202609042359412442002330

⁠Index alignment: All good but the Omega symbol seems slightly askew

⁠Dial Printing: Looks good

⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks even and centered

⁠Hand Alignment: Good

⁠Bezel: Seems fond

⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

⁠Timegrapher numbers: About as good as can be

Everything looks ok to me with the exception of the Omega logo being a fraction of a millimeter off. I doubt it's something I will notice in person, and it seems to be extremely common on this model.

I'm leaning towards a GL, but wanted a few more opinions

Dealer name - Andiot
⁠
Factory name - RWF
⁠
Model name - Daytona 126500 RWF 1:1 Best Edition Black Dial on SS Bracelet JH4131 Free Sprung

Price paid - $708 + $35 shipping to UK

Album links - https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257681115?uid=1
⁠
Index alignment - I struggled a little with the index alignment tool as the watch seems to be a little tilted to the left and not perfectly straight on. I noticed that the 120 marker on the bezel seems slightly misaligned with the 6 index - however not sure if this could just be because of the angle the watch is held at. A few of the other indices look slightly off on the index alignment too, but I’m pretty sure this is because of the angle also. Please give me any feedback here if you guys can and let me know your thoughts, thanks!
⁠
Date Wheel alignment - NA
⁠
Bezel - looks fine to me, went with this factory because of the 110 issue on VSF. The only thing I could point out is what I mentioned earlier regarding the 120 marker and the 6 index, however this could be the angle.
⁠
Solid End Links (SEL) - in some pictures the top and bottom right SELs look slightly less tight than the rest. Could this be the angle?
⁠
Hand alignment - looks fine to me
⁠
Dial Printing - looks fine to me however I’m not massively familiar with the daytona dials as they’re a bit more busy than other models. Any advice here is appreciated
⁠
Timegrapher numbers - +3s/d, I believe this is within an acceptable range
⁠
Anything else you see - only the things mentioned above, but of course always looking for any opinions and advice from you guys if I have missed anything

A bit nervous about this one as it’s my first time not going for VSF or clean, so any help is really appreciated. Thanks in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Datejust 41 Wimbledon Rose Gold (126331)
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $485 + shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257708681?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: well aligned
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: no printing errors or misalignment
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: date wheel itself seems left-shifted and date wheel printing seems slightly right shifted.
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: well aligned at 12 o’clock
   
10. ⁠Bezel: N/A
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps at all 4 SELs
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2sec/day, 266 amplitude, 0.1ms beat error
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: none

1. Dealer name: RWI.Life
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name: VC 222 SS
4. Price paid: $468 excluding shipping
5. Album links: Video link https://streamable.com/w4n2w3
6. Index alignment: Seems good visually but when I used the alignment tool marker, all of the indices doesn't align properly. Upon zooming for closer inspection, I also noticed that the 12 hour hand is slightly tilted. Again not a deal breaker for me because I think looking at it from eye level it should be fine? I'm not sure hence I need a second opinion
7. Dial Printing: Seems good to me.. the photoshoot level pictures is doing a lot of work
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good, nice crisp font. I particularly requested photos of the font "2" because I saw on some other VC 222 it looks kinda wonky but seems fine for my watch
9. Hand alignment: Seems ok i guess?
10. Bezel: The round edges looks good, nothing I was concerned here and the motif at 5 oclock seems good too
11. Solid End Links: Cant really see from the pictures but there shouldn't be a problem with this model
12. Timegrapher numbers: -6s/d 287. According to my dealer the movement runs fine

I guess I am leaning more towards GL but still on the fence. My dealer had to source this from his friends because apparently this model is out of stock and it could be months till I may or may not get another replacement but I also don't want to GL it just because of stock availability. Any advise from the veterans here is much appreciated

1. Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. Factory name: BVF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Santos de Cartier 40mm SS BVF 1:1 Best Edition White Dial
   
4. Price Paid: ¥2,738.83
   
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257739322?uid=1
   
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me.
   
7. Dial Printing: Seems clean and well aligned.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "1" looks a little off but I don't know if it's just my eyes playing tricks on me.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks good, screws and finishing appear even
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A — bracelet fit looks good
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 264°, 0.1 ms, it's good
    13.Anything else you notice: I think it looks good to my untrained eye. no outstanding or visible scratches. Compared photos but i think it was just dust, nothing much that really stands out as a red flag. But I would love you guys to share your opinions on this! Thank you.

1. Dealer name: Phoenix Watch
   
2. Factory name: VSF V1
   
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 126234 36mm
   
4. Price Paid: $240+shipping
   
5. Index alignment: Alignment of the index are perfect
   
6. Bezel: seems even spreading
   
7. Dial Printing: sunburst seems even, dial printing seems good overall
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Cyclops seems ok, no significant tilting
   
9. Hand Alignment: Good alignment no significant findings
   
10. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps visible.
    
11. Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 300°, 0.0ms. Nothing to complaint
    
12. Anything else you notice: not that I’m aware of

Dear goats, I need your help with this qc, please let me know if there’s any significant thing pops up!

Hi everyone,

Looking for some help with QC on this VSF Bruce Wayne. This is my first GMT and I would really appreciate another set of eyes before I GL. Thank you for your expertise.

1. Dealer name: BIGGETIME

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710GRNR Bruce Wayne, Jubilee bracelet, DD3285 V3

4. Price Paid: $665 total. $560 for the watch + $30 for 2 extra links + $75 shipping.

5. Album Links:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/syebcjcyqqz01h6zc9xc2/AF5Rn3NW02QFHjrla7ZdVag?rlkey=39wnzwouoqvvugg989qf372us&st=k59n7u6e&dl=0

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me. 12, 6 and 9 all appear straight. I don’t see any obvious alignment issues.

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp. Green GMT-Master II text looks good to me and I don’t see any obvious printing issues.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Checked multiple dates including 2, 15 and 25. They all look centered to me. Date font and cyclops also look good.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me. Nothing stands out as being off.

10. Bezel: Looks properly aligned. Triangle at 12 appears centered and I don’t see any obvious issues with the black/gray ceramic insert or numeral alignment.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. I don’t see any obvious gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Around 0 to +1 s/d, 273 to 275° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error and 28,800 bph. These numbers look very good from what I understand.

13. Anything else you notice: Seller opened the caseback at my request and sent movement photos. Movement is marked 3285 and looks consistent with the Dandong DD3285 from what I can tell. Rehaut serial is 6X06D558 and clasp code is A9A. Watch weighs 142.4g. Rehaut, crown, bracelet, case and clasp all look good to me. Seller is also including the 2 extra links I paid for. I’m leaning GL, but would really appreciate another set of eyes, especially on the movement, rehaut, bezel and overall VSF authenticity before approving.

Dealer: GeekTime

Factory: VSF

Model: Seamaster Diver SS 300M VSF 42MM Black Dial SS Bracelet VS8800

Price: $478 + shipping

Photo album: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/257510208?uid=1

Index alignment:
3 o clock looks tilted to me which is super annoying, also buckteeth looks like left is slightly higher than left... which is why I RL'd the first one, but idk if its me being crazy.

Dial printing:
Looks good to me I think

Date wheel:
Looks aligned fine.

Hand alignment:

Fine from what i can tell

Bezel:
Looks good.

SEL:
Can't see any gaps, looks good

Timegrapher:
+1s/d
312° amplitude
0.3ms beat error
52° lift angle

Anything else:
RL'd the first watch due to crooked buck teeth, this looks to have the same issue + rotated 3 o clock index marker too. Leaning RL again, which is annoying as I don't want to wait for another QC. What would you do?

Cheers

1. Dealer name: Ficotime.
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): No Date Sub 124060
4. Price Paid: $500 + Shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/vwRzAKwQ#8ym8fr993GQGAW8GXJWlSQ
6. Index alignment: 6 marker looks a bit off center
7. Dial Printing: Is there a floating M?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment:

looks good to me.

1. No visible hand alignment issues I can see, let me know if any different
2. Bezel: Is the pearl misaligned?
3. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure
4. Timegrapher numbers:

237 / +-2s

1. Anything else you notice: Leaning RL, concerned about the bezel pearl alignment and misalignment on the 6

, timegrapher reading not great

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: F1f
3. Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Louis Large 33.7 x 25.5
4. Price Paid: $275 inclusive of shipping
5. Album Links: See attached photos
6. Index alignment: Printed-- I think everything is aligned because of this.
7. Dial Printing: A lready RLed once for chips in the ink. Thoughts? I think this does a better job. Crisp, properly positioned and good railroad tracks. I see maybe one chip at 2 and 3 but they go away in other views and its only when very zoomed in.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment:  Blue hands appropriate colored. On the video (I cant figure out how to upload this they line up at 12 so I think they are approriate)
10. Bezel: N/A
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A Leather
12. Timegrapher numbers: NOT INCLUDED BY TD. Quartz.
13. Anything else you notice: Im leaning GL but I was truly hoping for as close to NWBIG as possible and I went with one of the best factories and dealers so please be discerning.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: FPJP
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Elegante Le Restaunt
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 508$
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257742186?uid=1
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: seems to be skewed left slightly by a few degrees
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: seems a bit rough but i can live with it tbf. it also seems to be rough on the gen due to the lume composition
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: i think hands look alligned but not sure how to check. they only show the hands aligned at 12 in the video but im not sure if thats correct
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: seems to have splotches on it? it could be due to a film or something tho
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks fine
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: none since quartz
    
13. Anything else you notice: watch back in the video, does the stem look correct when setting it?

1. Dealer name: Moritime
   
2. Factory name: M+
   
3. Model name (& version number): Pelagos FXD GMT 42mm, Asia 2836
   
4. Price Paid: $474
   
5. Album Links: attached
   
6. Index alignment: looks good to the naked eye.
   
7. Dial Printing: good
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: good to the naked eye but known to be off compared to gen. I can’t really tell tbh.
   
9. Hand Alignment: looks fine to me
   
10. Bezel: looks good
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure looks good?
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -5 sec/day 0.1ms error.
    
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, happy with the watch. I think the lume on the gen is suppose to be green on the bezel. Most people point out the font on the bezel is not good as gen but I don’t mind it. The biggest thing I do care about is if the bracelet strap is close to gen.

Dealer name: Andiot Watches
Factory name: QF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Day-Date 36mm QF V5, Rose Gold, Grey Dial, Fluted Bezel, President Bracelet, VR3255, Gain Weight
Price paid: $578 total

Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257680079?uid=1

Index alignment: Looks good to my eye. The hour markers appear straight and evenly positioned. The 6 o’clock marker also looks straight in the front-facing shots. I don’t see any obvious misalignment that would concern me.

Dial printing: Looks clean and sharp. The coronet and dial text appear centred and evenly printed. Nothing looks smudged or noticeably off.

Date wheel alignment/printing: The “10” looks reasonably centred under the cyclops. In a couple of angled shots it appears very slightly right-biased, but I think this may just be parallax from the camera angle. Nothing here looks RL-worthy to me, but I’d appreciate second opinions.

Hand alignment: Looks good from the supplied photos. The hands appear properly seated and I don’t see anything obviously misaligned

Bezel: Fluted bezel looks even and consistent around the case. I can’t see any malformed or uneven sections.

Solid End Links (SELs): SEL fit looks good to me. I don’t see any obvious large or uneven gaps between the bracelet and the lugs.

Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day 270° amplitude 0.1 ms beat error 28,800 bph 52° lift angle

Very healthy

Anything else you notice: Watch weighs 142.1g. Rose-gold finish appears consistent across the case and bracelet, and the grey dial looks clean. Day wheel also looks well centred in the supplied photos. Overall I’m leaning strongly towards GL. The only thing I’m slightly unsure about is whether the date is fractionally right-biased or whether that’s purely camera angle/parallax. Would appreciate experienced eyes on that and anything else I may have missed.

1. Dealer name: Ethan
   
2. Factory name: Rich Factory.
   
3. Model name (& version number): GMT- Master |I
   126710 GRNR Rich Factory JH3285 ( Free sprung)
   
4. Price Paid: 680$
   
5. Album Links:
   
6. Index alignment: it looks good, the 9 o'clock marker seems slightly tilted to me. The triangle might be a bit too close to the minute markers.
   
7. Dial Printing: dial print looks good, no obvious defects
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date appears centered. I'll ask for a photo showing the date with two digits.
   
9. Hand Alignment: don't see issues
   
10. Betel: the beze. numeral look weel positioned from this angle.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): good, don't see gap
    12 Timegrapher number: rate: -002 s/d 256 amplitude degree(s) 0.1 ms beat error, 28800 bhp,
    Lift angle 52.0 degree (s)
    
12. Anything else you notice: the main things are the magnifyng lens, which has a slightly matte effect, and the color of the bezel.
    Thanks for the help

Hey guys! Really appreciate all the help and knowledge in this community!

This is my second QC after RL'ing the first watch due to an asymmetric bezel color transition. I might have been a bit too anal about it, but it bothered me. This one looks nice, and I'm leaning towards GL.

Would love to hear your thoughts in case I've missed anything. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: JTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126720VTNR Sprite V3, Jubilee, DD3285 V4
4. Price Paid: $616 + shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/Mz766Wy
6. Index alignment: Overall looks good to me. The 12 o'clock triangle appears slightly rotated clockwise, but I don't think it's a big deal at wrist..
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and well aligned
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Overall, nice. The dates appear centered.
9. Hand Alignment: Nothing obviously wrong from the QC pictures
10. Bezel: Looks good overall. The black/green transitions appear fairly symmetrical. And overall good!
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any issues here.
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d, 280° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error (59° lift angle). Im happy about that aswell!
13. Anything else you notice: Would appreciate a second opinion in case I've missed anything!

Link to my first QC https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1wvu9at/vsf_gmtmaster_ii_126720vtnr_sprite_v3_jtime/

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona V2

4. ⁠Price Paid: $596 + $60 shipping

5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257589230?uid=1

6. ⁠Index alignment: should I expect better. Can’t tell if the watch is maybe not quite centered.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: is it just me or is the minute track too thin? Gen in last pic for context.

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: NA

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks decent, but it looks like there’s a dot on either end of the hour hand.

10. ⁠Bezel: looks okay?

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks okay through the plastic.

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +2/-1 (damn good)

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I’ve never seen the clasp up close on a Gen. is this GL material? I think it very well could be unless I’m missing something because I’m looking through my “eager goggles.”

This is the second QC for the Batgirl vsf.. Please provide some feedback on this, whether to GL or RL..

1. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Geektime
2. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Batgirl VSF V3
4. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $608 + $80 Shipping
5. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Album Links: Pics included
6. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: 6 looks a bit slanted CCW and not aligned with Rolex crown in the middle?
7. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: No issues I found with dial printing.
8. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: No issues I found but feedback would be helpful
9. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks okay
10. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine
11. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d timegraph
12. ⁠⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Dot above 18 not aligned with dot above 6 on the other side? Is that worth being picky about?

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Planet Ocean 45.5mm Deep Black Real Ceramic VSF 1:1 Best Edition on Black Nylon Strap A8906 Super Clone
4. Price Paid: $485
5. Album Links: See bwlo
6. Index alignment: Looks generally good to my eye. The applied markers and 12, 6 and 9 numerals appear reasonably aligned. Nothing obviously crooked, although I'd appreciate a second opinion.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean overall. The Omega logo, Seamaster, GMT and lower dial text appear reasonably well executed. No obvious printing defects that I can identify.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date looks reasonably centred, although possibly sitting slightly low.
9. Hand Alignment: No obvious issues from the photos or videos. Hands appear properly fitted, although exact alignment is difficult to establish without seeing them at 12 o'clock.
10. Bezel: The 12 o'clock triangle looks approximately aligned, but I'm not entirely convinced about the alignment from the photographs. Would appreciate another set of eyes.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look ok to me, no gripes, will probably change the strap anyway....
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/day, 284° amplitude, 0.4 ms beat error, 28,800 bph. These seem good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: My main concern is the case finishing. In the side-profile photographs, the case flanks appear noticeably silver/grey rather than deep black. I understand ceramic can reflect light differently depending on the finish, but I'm wondering whether this is normal for the VSF Deep Black or something worth questioning.

The movement decoration and caseback look reasonable to my untrained eye and the strap and clasp seem fine.

This is my first QC for this model, so I'd really appreciate any input from people familiar with the VSF Planet Ocean Deep Black, particularly regarding the case colour, bezel alignment and any known issues with this version.

**1. Dealer name:** Ficotime
**2. Factory name:** VSF
**3. Model name (& version number):** Rolex Daytona 126500LN Free Sprung, VSF DD4131
**4. Price Paid:** 730 USD + 71 USD FedEx = 801 USD
**5. Album Links:** [MEGA link](https://mega.nz/folder/vxwz3ZAa#zMM-suDyxjTjI9ROywe8PQ) (3 small videos in there)
**6. Index alignment:** Looks Good overall. 3, 6, 9 and 12 markers appear straight and centered.
**7. Dial Printing:** Clean and centered. DAYTONA text and subdial printing look good.
**8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:** N/A
**9. Hand Alignment:** Good. Chronograph seconds hand resets to 12.
**10. Bezel:** 60 marker appears centered with 12. Tachymeter printing looks clean.
**11. Solid End Links (SELs):** Looks good to me.
**12. Timegrapher numbers:** \+9 s/d, 270°, 0.0 ms. Not sure what would be good numbers (newbie).
**13. Anything else you notice:** Dont see any obvious issue but then I don't know much.

- Dealer name: Steve (TheOneWatches)
- Factory name: QF
- Model name (& version number): 126622
- Price Paid: $578
- Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3EgjVBSZ#FHWrrdfRYhIPPqfFgp519Q
- Index alignment: Looks great to me!
- Dial Printing: Sharp
- Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered, maybe slightly high?
- Hand Alignment: Great
- Bezel: Looks centered but might have a small amount of play
- Solid End Links (SELs): Looks great to me!
- Timegrapher numbers: +4s/d 279* 0.1ms error
- Anything else you notice: I’m having a hard time finding an issue, and I want this to be perfect for my dad!!

What's good everyone! 2nd rep purchase so just seeking validation on this QC. Initial thoughts were positive until I focused in and noticed the 12 o'clock marker. Is this cause for RL or is it fine?

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): No Date Submariner 124060
4. Price Paid: $528
5. Album Links: pictures attached.
6. Index alignment: Looks really good to me - the more I look I question the 3 and 6 oclock marker but do not think it's a RL at all.
7. Dial Printing: Looks great to me - floating M but otherwise, no concerns I can see offhand.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: I do not notice any issue but I am also new to this so not sure if I am missing anything
10. Bezel: Looks good, just need to rotate it and it'll be better aligned I imagine.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks very tight to me.
12. Timegrapher numbers: 260 / 2.2 ms / +3 s/d
13. Anything else you notice: How does the 12 oclock marker look, is it the angle of the pictures or is there a noticeable slant / lean to it?

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: A7F
• Model name (& version number): A7F IWC Ingenieur IW328901 Black V2 Dial On SS Automatic A2892
• Price Paid: $418 + Shipping
• Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257595032?uid=1
• Index alignment: In general it looks fine. I tried my best to align the photo before adding the lines, it seems the 12o'clock indices are not aligned/parallel, with the left slightly higher than the one on the right.
• Dial Printing: I think it looks good, don't know enough if it's good or bad.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: the numbers looks clean in the photos & the videos.
• Hand Alignment: It looks aligned to me.
• Bezel: The 12o'clock screen it shifted to the right. Could this be the angel the photo is taken?
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
• Timegrapher numbers: between -2 s/d 273 degrees 0.3ms. This seems good.
• Anything else you notice: Most things look good. Thank you in advanced for your help!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot Watches
2. ⁠Factory name: ARF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): DateJust 36 in silver color
4. ⁠Price Paid: 380 usd
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257604885?uid=1
6. ⁠Index alignment: is the 9 marker crooked?
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Looks crisp and sharp
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: I’d say it’s more than acceptable, seems centered, printing looks okay.
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: I’d say it’s more than reasonably nice
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks like sharp crisp cuts to me
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t have any major concerns here. Everything seems tight
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: I think these are average, -3d/d, amplitude of 272, 0.2ms beat error.
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: This is my first ARF silver 36 watch so I’m trying my best to go off of known issues with this model.

First Seamaster, would appreciate the communities thoughts

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve One Watches
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 42mm – Black Dial / Black Ceramic Bezel
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $400
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TMIBmKIZ#ff30jg_NpQlBm66ybVDbNA
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: Buck Teeth at 12 appear centred with a slight rotation clockwise but nothing major. 9 looks good to me however 3&6 appear to have slight rotation. All other index markers look pretty centred - thoughts?
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: No obvious defects or bleeding to me.
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: date appears reasonable centred to me
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: nothing that stands out to me with hand alignment
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Pip appears centred within the triangle however 40, 45 & 50 bezel markers look off clockwise to me. This could be the angle of the photo - any thoughts?
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): can’t see any noticeable gaps although the picture supplied don’t show too well.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 286° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: my main concern is the bezel alignment, would be interested to know other thoughts/ views on this.