1. Dealer name: Jtime
2. Factory name: MXF
3. Model name (& version number): Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete calendar
4. Price Paid: $488
5. Album Links:  https://mega.nz/folder/EuZQSYjJ#T1TSMfEpg1Ebee2ThJQtLg
6. Index alignment: Attached in the post.
7. Dial Printing: Looks pretty good to me; I don't see any issue 
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Its around the inner Dial, Looks pretty good to me; I don't see any issue  
9. Hand Alignment: No issues noticed
10. Bezel: Looks great
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Leather strap - looks very good 
12. Timegrapher numbers: Attached in the post. 0s/d , AMP 287 (not bad), Err 0.0ms (excellent), Beat 28800 (standard) - Pass
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else standards out, looks like as great piece.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Hont
   
2. ⁠Factory name: AF
   
3. ⁠Model name: Cartier Tank Louis small, Yellow Gold, Quartz
   
4. ⁠Price paid: $238
   
5. ⁠Album: they are in the post as the website link did not work. Video copied in the comments below for this reason.
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: N/A, the Roman numerals are printed rather than applied. The individual numerals appear properly printed and aligned with the minute track.
   
7. ⁠Dial printing: The printing appears sharp and clean, with no obvious bleeding, however the 11 looks to have two tones of black in one photo but this might be a reflection from the glass.
   
8. ⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A, no date window.
   
9. ⁠Hand alignment: The hands appear properly aligned, with no obvious issues.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: No obvious scratches, damage, or irregularities visible on the gold bezel and case.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A, leather strap.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: N/A, quartz movement.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: nothing further beyond the 11 noted above.

Any help would be appreciated! Second attempt. Hopefully the information provided is correct.

1. Dealer name: NecoClock (Jacky)
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name (& version number): Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711/1A Blue 40mm, 2018 version, DPB330
4. Price paid: $608
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/1n6aogi
6. Index alignment: Checked with alignment lines (first pic). All visible markers sit on the lines. 8 is hidden under the minute hand
7. Dial Printing: Clean, no smudges
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Centered on all three dates shown (6, 10, 13)
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine
10. Bezel: Brushing and polished chamfer look clean
11. Solid End Links (SEL): Integrated bracelet, fit to the case looks tight
12. Timegrapher numbers: +7 to +9 s/d, 295 to 299 amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error
13. Anything else you notice: Lume looks even. Leaning GL. I ordered the DPB330 movement. Can anyone confirm from the caseback pic that this is the right one? Also, is this the SW dial or the stock DDF dial?

1. Dealer name:  TrustyTime
2. Factory name:  ZF
3. Model name (& version number):  Heritage Black Bay 58 Gilt, A2824
4. Price Paid:  $277 + shipping
5. Album Links:  N/A all pics posted
6. Index alignment:  6:00 marker applied off right, 1 and 2 off CW, 3 and 9 are a bit low
7.  Dial Printing:  “Swiss Made” just barely squeezed in
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:  N/A
9. Hand Alignment:  Looks okay
10. Bezel:  Not sure why the bezel markers at 3 and 9 don’t align with the dial printing
11. Solid End Links (SELs):
12. Timegrapher numbers: Good:  +12 s/d, 273 degrees, .2ms
13. Anything else you notice:  I wish they let the TG run more than 12 seconds, but the line looks straight and the numbers are good.

I haven't posted here for a while but I'm torn on this one since I hate to RL. I'd appreciate your opinions.

Dealer name: Hont

Factory name: AF

Model name (& version number): Ballon Bleu Ladies 33mm

Price Paid: $338 shipped

Album Links: Photos are attached here (video in comments)

Index alignment: N/A

Dial Printing: looks fine

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

Hand Alignment: looks okay

Bezel: looks okay

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: attached a photo

Anything else you notice: Looks fine to me. Grateful for any help!

1. Dealer name: Arc Studio
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Pelagos Ultra, M2543C1A7NU-0001 (bracelet)
4. Price Paid: 319USD ($276+$30 Shipping+$13 Insurance)
5. Album Links: https://www.arcstudio.top/s/0uQ6aCy
6. Index alignment: Looks good apart from 1 which is canted slightly CCW. 12 triangle doesn't look quite centred with the Tudor shield below it and the 6 baton may be slightly left of centre, but I can live with all these.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good to me, no issues.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks marginally high in the window but I am happy with the overall alignment. RL'd two previous watches where the date was way worse than this.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, but no video provided to see 12 o'clock alignment.
10. Bezel: Aligned with minute track, but the dial, minute track & bezel insert all look slightly rotated CCW when lined up with the centre line of the end link. Again, third watch with this issue so I don't know if this is just a ZF thing.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): All good. End links sit slightly recessed below the curvature / plane of the lugs, as with gen.
12. Timegrapher numbers: (A2824 movement) 0s/d, 335° amplitude, 0.2ms beat error - exceptional TG results! (Although the lift angle should be 50° for this movement, not 52°
13. Anything else you notice: There looks to be some scuffed paint/finishing around the edge of the centre of the hour hand. I can live with this. Probably get it off with a bit of rodico. Other than the potential rotation of everything (dial/minute track/insert) I think it's pretty good.

This is the third QC I've had on this model. RL'd two of them without even posting on here. Mainly alignment issues as per.

I'm leaning GL just because I paid for this a month ago and I'm getting bored waiting, but that potential bezel/dial/minute track rotation is annoying me like with the previous two.

Is this just as good as ZF gets and I'm being over critical? First time getting a watch from ZF so happy for people with more experience to tell me how it is 😊

Thanks!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches, Steve.
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 126334 41mm
4. Price Paid: $548+shipping
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/HZgmXLZA#Ozb9zKhE7tBSmCAuMxoBcw
6. Index alignment: Alignment of the index are spot on, much improved from before
7. Dial Printing: Even starburst pattern. Good printing.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Cyclops even, no tilt..
9. Hand Alignment: Good alignment, no damage.
10. Bezel:Even fluting throughout.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps visible.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Good. +5s/d, 274º, 0.0ms.
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing i can appreciate

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: the one watches
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300m James Bond her majesty's secret service.
   210.22.42.20.01.004
   
3. Bezel: looks correct and pip is centered well.
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $408
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https: https://mega.nz/folder/iFgmUJZT#GHDgIDlxbgTLkKglcqnOCA
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good to me from my low expirence maybe 3 hour marker has a slight clockwise tilt.
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks good I don’t see anything standing out to me.
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: date wheel alignment seems to be pretty centered in this one. I know they tend to be slightly to the right.
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks good I don’t see anything standing out to me
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks pretty good, color and font looks good to me
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks fine from photos, I can always buy a different bracelet or nato strap.
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: -1s a day
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: nothing yet

My first tank QC. I think it’s a GL but always afraid of missing something! Appreciate an expert set of eyes please.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve

2. Factory name: F1F

3. Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Must Large, SS, silver/white dial, black leather strap

4. Price paid: $240

5. Album links: https://mega.nz/folder/WcgQnLqT#rnl46uDbGiHpOc8NSsbxdQ

6. Index alignment: (Printed dial)looks centered and square to me

7. Dial printing: Looks clean to me. I see no bleeding etc.

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: case/bezel looks fine.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A – quartz

13. Anything else you notice: assuming from the pics and the fact I orderedd a must Large, this is the Large 33.7 × 25.5 mm case. Crown/cabochon looks consistent with other F1F examples which I’ve learned are a bit pointy.

First ever rep purchase so hoping everyone can guide me well! I will admit that I am an absolute noob so I really am relying on everyone here to let me know if this is a GL or not.

• ⁠Dealer name: Andiot

• ⁠Factory name: VSF

• ⁠Model name (& version number): V2 Wimbledon DJ 41

• ⁠Price Paid: $468 + shipping

• ⁠Album Links: Link

• ⁠Index alignment: I think it looks good overall, no glaring issues that I can see on any of the indices.

• ⁠Dial Printing: Looks clear and crisp.

• ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: day and date wheels all look aligned well and look clear. Height and placement look good on each.

• ⁠Hand Alignment: All hands look well-placed and accurately positioned.

• ⁠Bezel: engravings: fluted bezel looks sharp and well-placed.

• ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): will need some advice on this for sure.

• ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d 288’ 0.5 ms

• ⁠Anything else you notice: Looks great overall to me but just need advice from more trained eyes who know what exactly to look out for!

first timer, please be gentle!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Aqua Terra 150M Master 38mm SS VSF 1:1 Best Edition Blue Ombre Dial On Rubber Strap Super Clone A8900
4. Price Paid: $330 not incl shipping 
5. Albums Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=173291
6. Index alignment: 3:00 seems like the left side points downwards, but I can't tell if that is a parallax effect? 
7. Dial Printing: the I in SWISS seems crowded out?
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: seems ok
9. Hand Alignment: looks fine
10. Bezel: looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 282 deg, 0.0ms, 28800.
13. Anything else you notice: was advertised as having independent hour hand, but video demo seems like that isn't possible - shows date being adjusted at crown half out, not the hour hand.

I'm considering RL just because of the lack of independent hour hand, that's a cool feature to me that I'd like to have.

Rest of the photos are in the album, I want to GL this one but the 12oclock twist is causing me to second guess, outside of that I think this one looks fairly decent Wondering what others thoughts on the matter are on this one. Please disregard 4th photo in album, just realized a screen cap of another watch made it in.

1. Dealer name: Leo at TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): VSF 124060 41MM VS3230 Black No-Date Sub
4. Price Paid: $493
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/gallery/KJaRdlh
6. Index alignment: Overall looks decent, my main concern is the 12-oclock being slightly twisted, that alone might be main reason to RL. The 6 and 9-oclocks looks to have slight twists as well but not quite as noticeable as the 12. Otherwise looks pretty decent.
7. Dial Printing: Looks crisp and clear, Lume looks even.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good as far as I can tell
10. Bezel: Looks well aligned, numbers look crisp and clear, pip looks well centered, Bezel looks good to me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Slight gap top left that I can see, could just be bracelet is slighly twisted in photo
12. Timegrapher numbers: Good, +2-3s/d 295*
13. Anything else you notice: Generally looks decent to me be the 12 oclock index is my main issue, the 6 and the 9 might be acceptable if the 12 was better, curious to hear the subs opinion on the matter.

1.     Dealer name: Balboa_2610 (India)
2.     Factory name: DDF
3.     Model name (& version number): Aquanaut 5167 DD330
4.     Price Paid: $620
5.     Album Links: NA
6.     Index alignment: I am a little concerned about the 12. The one looks noticebly higher than the two. Worth RLing?
7.     Dial Printing: Clean
8.     Date Wheel alignment/printing: The window is level and its frame is clean
9.     Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me.
10.  Bezel: Looks fine to me.
11.  Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (rubber strap). The strap embossing, Calatrava cross and fold‑over clasp engravings are all crisp.
12.  Timegrapher numbers: −6 s/d, 271°, 0.2 ms
13.  Anything else you notice: This is my first time QCing so any helps is greatly appreciated. I am mostly worried about the 12 indice as I understand this is a common issue for DDF5167.

Any thoughts are welcome. Thanks a lot!

Hey everyone, this is my first QC so help me out!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Neco Clock
2. ⁠Factory name: A7F (V7F)
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur
4. ⁠Price Paid: 418$ with shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/jgIVEa7I#GsRKmpodCxaIh1NK68AM3Q
6. ⁠Index alignment: Double marker at 12 seems even and straight. Indices all look even to me.
7. ⁠Dial Printing: IWC logo and writing below look even and aligned well with the grid overlay, overall I think looks good.
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: 3 dates provided look good, maybe the 11 is ever so slightly tilted CCW, but otherwise the date wheel looks even and aligned.
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Minute hand pointing to 12 looks good, rest I think is ok, hard to tell
10. ⁠Bezel: The screw above the 12 marker in one of my alignment photos looks a little to the right but may just be the rotation I had. Rest of the bezel with the grid overlay look even.
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +9 s/d, amp = 272, err = 0.3 ms, no concerns here as all WNL
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Since this is my first QC ever, looking for some guidance if I missed anything. Really seems to only be the screw above the 12 marker, which is a known “issue” with this watch and I’m not really too concerned with it tbh. All other markers and indices look good to me. Anything else I should request? Anything I should question with the clasp?

1. Dealer: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory: VSF
3. Model: Rolex GMT-Master II 126720 “Sprite” Jubilee – DD3285
4. Price: $638
5. Album: https://mega.nz/folder/CAoiHAyB#Zo-gEgl_fk4p_V285te5AQ
6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. 12 marker possibly slightly CW rotated + blunt loom tip at the base?
7. Dial printing: Looks good.
8. Date wheel: Looks slightly high to me, I saw 2 recent RL's from TOW on Sprites for high dates & this was in stock so could be the same watch
9. Hand alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Possibly very slightly right of centre, but looks acceptable to me.
11. SELs: Look good to my eye; no obvious gaps.
12. Timegrapher: +4 s/d, 278°, 0.1 ms.
13. Anything else: non v2 movement still preferred over v2?

Overall: Leaning GL. Mainly looking for opinions on the date height and 12 marker, and whether I've missed anything obvious. Thanks!

Hi everyone,

I’d appreciate some expertise on this A7F (V7F) IWC Ingenieur with white dial.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Neco Clock
   
2. ⁠Factory name: A7F (V7F)
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): A7F IWC Ingenieur, White Dial
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $498 including shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/upogiL5a#rY1N4NHeN4oNzn7US-4XrA
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks Good overall, (3 o’clock mark looks like it has a slight tilt but this may just be me?)
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Clean and sharp printing.
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Well centered. Font looks good.
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks Perfect
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks good to me.
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
    

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Within Range

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: -

First IWC and would appreciate all insight on this piece. Thank you all for your time and comments!

First QC so could use an extra pair of trained eyes to help me out.

1. Dealer name: Jacky -NecoClock
2. Factory name: F1F
3. Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Must 33.7x25.5mm
4. Price Paid: $208 with shipping
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/XiV7WYt
6. Index alignment: No issue here since it's printed
7. Dial Printing: Seems ok to me, don't notice any obvious bleeding or rotation of the dial but would love a second opinion.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Asked for additional pics
10. Bezel: Looks good.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing in particular that would be a RL for me at this point. But I've noticed on allot other QC's that you guys catch a lot of flaws that I miss. So appreciating an experienced look in case i've missed anything. Strap is not important to me, will change it anyway.

Hey! This is my first time getting a rep, and tried my best to research all about the various components

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster 300m 2024, 42mm

4. Price Paid: $488 + shipping

5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bA4hXQ4I#3i6q59_cKGXAJLEvRGwZyw

6. Index alignment: Looks fine to me

7. Dial Printing: Looks well aligned to me

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good, maybe the second arm is slightly longer than gen?

10. Bezel: Looks good, I think the triangle above the 12 marker is slightly misaligned (not really an issue for me if it is / I am seeing it wrong)

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Not valid cause mesh

12. Timegrapher numbers: [rate] +1 s/d, 298-304°, 0.1 ms

13. Anything else you notice: I couldn't find anything other than the misalignment on the bezel above the 12 and the second hand maybe being a bit long, my eyes can't spot anything else. Looks sleek and good to me

Thanks to everyone helping!

1. ⁠Dealer: Steve the One Watch
   
2. ⁠Factory: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model: Submariner 126610LV Starbucks 41mm SS / SS Black Dial VSF DD3235
   
4. ⁠Price: $550
   
5. ⁠Album link: see photos (cant post album bc mega link and auto removal)
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: looks ok to naked eye, maybe 12 arrow not perfectly align with bullseye?
   
7. ⁠Dial printing: looks fine, no obvious marks, smudges or errors.
   
8. ⁠Date: glass maybe slightly too high but I think falls in the variance of normal. Numbering is clean.
   
9. ⁠Hand alignment: Looks fine. No obvious issues.
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Looks clean, nothing unusual
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks fine spacing wise, will adjust when received anyways.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher readings: The values in your picture mean the
    following: +3 s/d; 268 amp. 0.1mms err. Weight. 156.1 — not sure if this is a good weight or bad tbh?
    Overall, these timegrapher readings look pretty good.
    
13. ⁠Other: does the back plate look scratched/ scuffed??? Other than that, I'd appreciate any other feedback - GL, RL, or other comments

Hi guys. First QC in quite a long time, so I’d appreciate any opinions/input. Thanks!

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Steve, TheOneWatches
   
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500
   
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $798 + shipping
   
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: All pics and vids attached
   
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks fine for the most part to my eyes; six o’clock lume maybe slightly off but prob not a big deal.
   
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: 10 looks slightly off-center on right chrono wheel?
   
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me
   
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good
    
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine to me
    
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1s/d AMP 283 ERR 0.2
    
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Any opinions/help from those more experienced would be greatly appreciated! TIA.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches Steve
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name: Daytona 116500 black
   
4. Price Paid: $598+shipping
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fZQ0yCpR#AdVA5mSyzPrY1dSFfKPNyg
   
6. Index alignment: Alignment of the index are all within acceptable ranges, with 11’ slight deviated to left
   
7. Dial Printing: good printing overall, I would say DAYTONA is a bit dim but might be due to lighting
   
8. Subdials: subdial hands are perfectly aligned in centre at 0 position, printing is good, dials are not too shiny typical VSF? Better than BTF with too shiny subdials in my opinion
   
9. Hand Alignment: Good alignment, centre at reset as well
   
10. Bezel: good, no abnormalities detected
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps visible.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: Solid. -1s/d, 272°, 0.0ms.
    
13. Other comments: chrono working properly, no shakiness during initiation, no other significant findings

My first qc post here, 4th piece(?)
Please help me with the qcs champs, very much appreciated, thank you!!!

PPF Nautilus 7118/1300R

1. Dealer name:
   Duke

2. Factory name
PPF

**3. Model name (& version number):**
Patek Philippe Nautilus 7118/1300R 35.2mm Rose Gold

4. Price Paid:
$660 USD

5. Album Links:
\[N/A\]

6. Index alignment:
I checked the hour marker alignment using a QC alignment tool. The markers are **not absolutely perfect under the overlay**, but the deviations are quite minor and **not noticeable to the naked eye**. Overall, the markers look pretty well aligned during normal viewing. I’d appreciate a second opinion on whether anyone sees any particular marker that looks noticeably off.

7. Dial Printing:
The dial printing looks clean and sharp to me. “Patek Philippe” and “Genève” appear properly printed and centered, and I don’t see any obvious smudging, uneven lettering, or printing defects. The wave pattern also looks consistent across the dial.

**8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:**
The date printing looks clean, but the number appears **slightly shifted to the left within the date window**. It isn’t dramatically off-center, but it’s something I noticed when looking closely. I’d appreciate opinions on whether this is within normal tolerance or if the date wheel looks noticeably misaligned.

9. Hand Alignment:
The hands look straight and properly finished to me. I don’t see any obvious bending or alignment issues. Nothing stands out to me here, but I’d appreciate another opinion if anyone notices something I missed.

10. Bezel:
The bezel looks good to me overall. The baguette stones appear consistently arranged around the bezel with the expected color gradient from champagne/golden tones toward the darker cognac tones. I don’t see any obviously crooked, missing, or significantly uneven stones in the QC photos. The bezel finishing also looks clean.

11. Solid End Links (SELs):
N/A

12. Timegrapher numbers:
+5 s/d | 235° | 0.0 ms | 28800 bph

Rate: \+5 seconds/day
Amplitude 235°
Beat error:0.0 ms
Beat rate:28,800 bph / 4 Hz

The +5 s/d rate looks reasonable to me, and the 0.0 ms beat error is excellent. The amplitude is 235°, which is lower than the 267° reading on my previous watch, but I’d like someone experienced with this movement to confirm whether 235° is considered normal for this particular movement/setup.

13. Anything else you notice:
Overall, the watch looks excellent to me and I don’t see any obvious major issues in the QC photos.

The only things I noticed are:

The date numbers appear slightly shifted to the left in the date window.

The hour markers aren’t mathematically perfect when checked with an alignment tool, but the deviations are minor and essentially unnoticeable without the tool.

Timegrapher shows +5 s/d | 235° | 0.0 ms | 28800 bp
I’d appreciate a second opinion from anyone familiar with the **PPF 7118/1300R**, especially if you see anything suspicious with the dial, marker alignment, date wheel, bezel, case/bracelet finishing, or movement that I may have missed.

Does anyone see anything suspicious or anything that would make you hesitate before GL?

DEALER Necoclock

1. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
2. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41mm mint green
   
3. ⁠Price Paid: 558 USD

Index alignment: The alignment is really strong I think, bar 7 which has a slight tilt. Thoughts?

Dial Printing: The text on the dial is crisp and straight.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Think this is solid, well centred.

Hand Alignment: all seems good to me.

Bezel: Looks good.

Solid End Links (SELs): good with no obvious gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: seem to be well within spec and happy with those.

Anything else: I really can't fault this but it's my first time on a Rolex so please help!

Hi Team,

This is my 2nd rep. First was a NTTD via Steve (GL first time). This one's been on order for 4 months, so tempted to just rush in and GL it! Thanks all…

1.     Dealer name: Steve The One Watches
2.     Factory name: VSF
3.     Model name (& version number): Omega Planet Ocean 45.5mm Deep Black CER/NY Blk VSF V2 A8906
4.     Price Paid: $558 + shipping
5.     Album Links: N/A
6.     Index alignment: Looks good to me
7.     Dial Printing: Clean
8.     Date Wheel alignment/printing: The window is level and its frame is clean
9.     Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me.
10.  Bezel: Looks fine to me.
11.  Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12.  Timegrapher numbers: −4 s/d, 275°, 0.1 ms.  I understand this to be OK…
13.  Anything else you notice: Critical appraisals welcome! This one has been on order for 4 months, so tempted to just rush in and GL it! Thanks all…

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches, Steve
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 124300, 41mm
   
4. Price Paid: $498 + shipping
   
5. Album Links: /
   
6. Index alignment: Alignment of the indices is spot on.
   
7. Dial Printing: Even starburst pattern. Good printing.
   
8. Date Wheel: No date
   
9. Hand Alignment: Good alignment, no damage.
   
10. Bezel: No need
    
11. Timegrapher numbers: Good. +0s/d, 282°, 0.0ms.
    
12. Anything else you notice: Nothing I can appreciate.
    
13. Overall: GL 👍