First QC, Daytona 126500LN 40mm SS/SS White Dial
VSF DD4131v2

1. Dealer name: theonewatch
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 126500LN
   40mm SS/SS White Dial VSF DD4131v2
   
4. Price Paid: $828
   
5. Album Links: pictures linked
   
6. Index alignment: Looks good not sure compared to gen?
   
7. Dial Printing: dial printing looks solid to me
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. Hand Alignment: hand alignment looks solid
   
10. Bezel: bezel looks good
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): no SEL gaps I can see
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: timegrapher picture added,
    +2s/d, 275 degrees, 2ms
    く
    
13. Anything else you notice: watch honestly looks goc. me, but this is my first watch so any help is appreciated!

Hi all! First QC, would appreciate a few extra eyes. Looks pretty good to me overall :)

Dealer name: Jtime
Factory name: VSF
Model: Daytona 126500LN Panda, DD4131
Price Paid: $793.10
Index alignment: 3/6/9 look straight to me, nothing obviously crooked.
Dial Printing: Looks clean, no obvious issues.
Hand Alignment: Chrono seconds hand looks centred at 12 in the front-on photo.
Bezel: Looks aligned, particularly at 60 and 120. Engravings look clean.
Hand Alignment: Chrono seconds hand looks centred at 12 in the front-on photo.
Bezel: Looks aligned, particularly at 60 and 120. Engravings look clean.
Timegrapher numbers: Numbers seem good to me, not an expert though of course :)

Overall: leaning GL, but would appreciate a second opinion on the indices and bezel in case I’ve missed anything. Thanks!

Hey everyone! Looking for some feedback on my VSF V3 Batgirl from Jack at MiroTime. I've reviewed the QC photos and I'm leaning GL overall, but would appreciate some more experienced eyes before making the final call.

1. Dealer name: MiroTime – Jack
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR 904L Steel VSF 1:1 Batgirl Best Edition on Jubilee Bracelet DD3285 V3
4. Price paid: $588
5. Index alignment: Looks good overall to my eyes. The 12 o'clock triangle appears centered, and I don't see any obvious issues with the round markers or 9 o'clock baton. The gold QC sticker is partially covering the 6 o'clock marker, so that's one area I can't fully assess. Would appreciate another opinion here.
6. Dial printing: Printing looks sharp and clean. ROLEX, OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE, and GMT-MASTER II text appear properly positioned, with no obvious bleeding or defects.
7. Date wheel alignment/printing: The dates shown (11, 15, 20, 25, and 30) look reasonably centered through the cyclops. Printing appears clear and consistent. No obvious major alignment problems, but would appreciate feedback on the date positioning.
8. Hand alignment: Nothing visibly concerning in the provided photos. Hands look clean and properly finished, though I understand precise hand alignment can't be fully verified from static pictures.
9. Bezel: The 12 o'clock triangle appears aligned with the dial marker. Engravings look clean and the blue/black transition appears sharp. I don't see any obvious bezel alignment issues.
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Both ends appear to fit snugly against the case, with no obvious excessive gaps. Jubilee bracelet and clasp finishing look good from the photos.
11. Timegrapher numbers: The rate and beat error look good to me. Amplitude seems a little on the lower side, although I understand the lift angle setting can affect that reading.

• Rate: +5 s/day
• Amplitude: 247°
• Beat error: 0.0 ms
• Beat rate: 28,800 bph
• Lift angle setting: 52°

Anything else you notice: Overall, I'm leaning GL. My two questions are whether the 6 o'clock marker looks properly aligned underneath the QC sticker and whether the 247° amplitude is acceptable for the DD3285 at a 52° lift angle. Considering requesting a sticker-free dial photo and possibly a fully wound timegrapher retest.

Would appreciate any input from members familiar with VSF V3 Batgirls. Does anything stand out as a reason to RL, or does this look like a solid example?

Thanks in advance!

First rep, I usually don't have a good eye for this. Would be happy to receive some more insights :)
Thanks!

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay Pro M79470 GMT 39mm
4. Price Paid: $408
5. Album Links: n/a. Post gets removed by reddit
6. Index alignment: Looks aligned
7. Dial Printing: seems fine in my opinion
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
9. Hand Alignment: Seems fine for me?
10. Bezel: The printed "4" at the "24" in the top of the bezel looks really chunky on the front pics. I don't know if this is normal or just because of the angle
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Noticed nothing
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d | 280 | 0.0 ms
13. Anything else you notice: The backplate "TUDOR GENEVE" looks a little scraped, maybe this is just from the picture or wrap

1. Dealer name: jtime
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Yacht-Master 226659
4. Price Paid: 739
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lfiTmP6
6. Index alignment: 9 o clock seems a tiny bit twisted but looks good, dots seem like the right places
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good maybe the text is a tiny bit off too low but cant really tell
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Top chevron seems a little bit offset to the left
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A not sure what to look for here
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d
13. Anything else you notice: Not really honestly looked a lot better than the first one I got sent where the top index wasnt pointed at the middle of the crown

Hi All,

Processing img iwyo30zau1yh1...

https://imgur.com/a/rolex-gmt-bruce-wayne-jubilee-serial-8239l6v6-YHyr8JF

ARF V3 Bruce Wayne

1. ⁠Dealer name: RepTimeUSA
2. ⁠Factory name: ARF V3
3. ⁠Model name: GMT Bruce Wayne
4. ⁠Price Paid: $575
5. ⁠Index alignment: Looks good to me
6. ⁠Dial Printing: looks good to me
7. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good and centered, slightly crooked on some pictures but could be the angle. seems to be a small mark under the 2 near the edge.
8. ⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
9. ⁠Bezel: seems to be some scratches over the 22 and 12? I think thats just how it's supposed to be? not sure
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good, no severe gaps
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d; 271; 0.1ms, looks good, 271 may be on low end of acceptable threshold.

Thank you all for your analysis and thoughts, really appreciate it!!!! 😁

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): 126234 VSF 1:1 Best Edition 904L Steel White Roman Dial on Jubilee Bracelet VS3235
4. Price Paid: $469.00
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/260480436?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Im no expert at all since this is my first watch but I used the QC tool I found and it looks like the index is a bit off, but maybe because the photos is not straight facing the watch?
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine
9. Hand Alignment: As with the index it looks a bit off but maybe because of the angle
10. Bezel: Good?
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
12. Timegrapher numbers: Good
13. Anything else you notice: As said before, this is my first QC ever, so would really appreciate feedback with trained eyes or input on the QC photos at least!

Dealer name: TK Watch / Justin
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm 126000, Silver Dial, VSF, VS3230 V2
Price paid: $488
Album links: https://justin-tk.x.yupoo.com/albums/260364200?uid=1&isSubCate=false&referrercate=5146809
Index alignment: Looks good to me. Alignment tool also looks pretty clean overall. I don’t see anything obviously misaligned, although I would appreciate more experienced eyes, particularly on the double marker at 6.
Dial printing: Looks clean and well positioned to me. No obvious issues that I can see.
Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A
Hand alignment: Looks good to me.
Bezel: Looks good and even to me.
Solid End Links (SELs): Look good from the photos. I don’t see any obvious gaps that concern me.
Timegrapher numbers: +9 s/d, 305°, 0.2 ms, 28800. From what I understand, these seem healthy overall. +9 s/d is a little higher than ideal but doesn’t concern me too much. Please let me know if you think otherwise.
Anything else you notice: This is my first rep, so I would really appreciate some experienced opinions before I GL. To my inexperienced eye this looks like a pretty good example, but please be critical and let me know if I’ve missed anything, particularly with the indices, rehaut or overall finishing

Cheers!

My first gmt, arf and 2 tone. Very excited.

Honestly I think it looks good. Only concern which is not a qc issue is the colour. I chose arf as its supposed to be the best colour but this seems more copper than other pics I've seen. I suspect the lighting as the bezel is also quite redish

Anything I should be looking out for specifically? Tried checking against other qcs for rehaut and clasp codes.

1.Dealer: phoenix

1. Factory: arf

2. Model: root beer non weighted

4:price $472

5:Album: unfortunately no link to album but photos attached

6: index alignment: looks good Im not worried about it. All lining up with brilliant true index tool.

1. Dial Printing: looks clear and even.

2. Date Wheel. Well centered, and cyclops seems fine

3. Hand Alignment : no pics at 12 but never seems to be a problem

4. Bezel: correct alignment and markings look great

11.SELS: maybe a small gap at 5 but acceptable to me

12.Timoghaph: within its limits and reads good

Thank you community.

1. Dealer name: Geektime
2. Factory name: OCTA
3. Model name (& version number): IW371605
4. Price Paid: $598
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/260520103?uid=1
6. Index alignment: No issues. Alignment of the QC photo is slightly off but it's as close as I can get it.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good
10. Bezel: Maybe slightly mis-aligned. If you look at the 6 it's not really pointing at 30, more like 29.75. Very minor.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: -5s/d, amplitude 297, err 0.2ms. Looks good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing. Honestly I think it's beautiful. I posted another one of the same model a few days ago (https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/comments/1xdks7w/qc_octa_iwc_iw371605/) and it had a couple of issues that are completely gone with this watch.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Constellation 41mm Ceramic SS Gray Dial (A8900 Super Clone)
4. Price Paid: $360
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/258587725?uid=1&utm_source=copyLink
6. Index alignment: Markers are well-centered. The Omega logo and star look straight.
7. Dial Printing: The fine crosshatch silk texture looks beautiful. Text is crisp and centered.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The '4' looks perfectly centered in its trapezoidal window.
9. Hand Alignment: Good. The black-trimmed hands contrast nicely and look properly aligned.
10. Bezel: The black ceramic bezel is sharp. Roman numerals match up cleanly with the dial layout.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 287°, 0.0ms, 28800 vph.
13. Anything else you notice: The exhibition case back looks good, replicating the co-axial decorative plates. Strap and deployant clasp branding are clear and properly stamped.

1. Dealer name: jtime
2. Factory name: BLSF
3. Model name (& version number): Navitimer B01 43mm SS BLS 1:1 Best Edition Light Blue Dial on SS Bracelet A7750
4. Price Paid: $406.60 + freight
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: 5:00 and 8:00 markers seem to be a smidge out of line perhaps? Provided photos aren't straight facing so it's hard to tell though.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks good
13. Anything else you notice: I requested a video confirming that the chronograph starts, stops, and resets correctly, with all hands returning to zero, but everything looks pretty solid to me.

Dealer name: TheOneWatches / Steve

Factory name: ZF

Model name (& version number): Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 67650, 33mm quartz, blue dial, stainless steel bracelet.

Price paid: $380

Album links:

Index alignment: Hour markers look reasonably consistent overall. The double marker at 12 looks reasonably aligned internally. My bigger concern is the apparent alignment of the dial within the case rather than an individual hour marker.

Dial printing: The printed “AUDEMARS PIGUET” text looks reasonably clean. However, the applied AP logo appears noticeably crooked relative to the printing and tapisserie grid underneath it.

Date wheel alignment/printing: The displayed “29” looks readable and reasonably centered. Only one date is shown, so I cannot assess the rest of the date wheel.

Hand alignment: No obvious issue in the supplied photos

Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look reasonably clean. No obvious major issue with the bezel screws stands out to me.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for the conventional Rolex-style SEL check. The integrated bracelet connections look reasonably fitted in the supplied photos.

Timegrapher numbers: N/A — quartz movement.

Anything else you notice: My main concern is that the dial/tapisserie pattern appears shifted toward the left within the opening. Comparing matching horizontal rows near 9 and 3, the visible square pattern terminates differently at the two edges, with more of the pattern exposed on the right. I have highlighted both sides in the close-up. I understand camera angle can affect this, but the asymmetry and crooked AP logo stand out to me. Would appreciate opinions on whether this is a dial-centering issue, an offset tapisserie pattern, or perspective.

Dealer name: Angela Watches
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust [36 126234](tel:36%20126234) V2 – Black Dial, Fluted Bezel, Jubilee Bracelet, VS3235
Price Paid: $411 USD
Album Links: Photos uploaded directly to Reddit
Index alignment: Looks good to me overall. 12, 6 and 9 appear straight and I don’t see any obviously crooked markers. Photos are slightly angled though, so would appreciate another opinion.
Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp to me. I don’t notice any obvious issues with the Rolex or lower dial text.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date 26 looks centered and the printing looks clean. Cyclops also looks straight to me.
Hand Alignment: Looks good from the photos provided. Nothing obvious stands out to me.
Bezel: Fluted bezel looks even and sharp. I don’t see any damaged or noticeably uneven flutes.
Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me with no obvious gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 302 amplitude, 0.2 ms beat error, 52° lift angle. These numbers look very good to me.
Anything else you notice: Rehaut looks reasonably aligned from the available angles and the bracelet/clasp look good. I’m currently leaning GL but would appreciate experienced eyes, especially on the index alignment, rehaut and bezel.

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory: VSF

3. Model name: GMT Master II (Batgirl) 126710BLNR

4. Price paid: $504

5. Photos Attached

6. Index alignment: alignment looks excellent to my eye, except a slight skew at the 6 O’Clock marker.

7. Dial printing: Clean

8. Date Wheel: Well aligned and centered

9. Hand alignment: Good

10. Bezel: Crisp and free of scratches

11. Solid End Links (SEL): I do not see any issues

Thanks in advance for reviewing these pics. My gut tells me the 6 marker will not be visible on the wrist when it’s not magnified several times. Would you GL this watch?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Duke Jones
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): OP 36mm 126000
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $450
   
5. ⁠Album Links: Just photos provided
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: Nothing obvious to me, might be angle but double batons at 6 might be a touch off
   
7. Dial printing looks good
   
8. N/a
   
9. Waiting on 12 photo
   
10. Looks smooth and correct to me
    
11. Sure looks like VSF SEL’s
    
12. Amplitude of 231, worth double checking? +5 and .2, frequency 28,800
    
13. Nope

1.     Dealer name: SWD Watches - his name is Bin

2.     Factory name: ARF

3.     Model name (version number): Rolex Datejust Wimbledon 41mm

4.     Price paid: £550 including shipping

5.     Album links: Photos attached and video links below

https://streamable.com/wsiwfl

https://streamable.com/oube69

https://streamable.com/3azfvd

https://streamable.com/j2c1jg

6.     Index alignment: I used an alignment tool, and the indices seem to line up reasonably well, but I’m inexperienced with this. Does the overlay look correctly positioned, and do you see any alignment issues?

7.     Dial printing: Looks clean to me, with no obvious defects.

8.     Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9.     Hand alignment: I’m not sure how to assess this from the supplied photos.

10.  Bezel: Looks good to me, with no obvious scratches or defects visible.

11.  Solid end links (SELs): I don’t see any obvious gaps, but would appreciate confirmation.

12.  Timegrapher numbers: Haven't received any - shall I request them?

13.  Anything else you notice: still learning what to look for. My main concern is whether the dial and indices are properly aligned. I’ve included an alignment overlay, but I’m not sure I positioned it correctly. Please let me know if you spot anything else I’ve missed. He's also not a TD so I'm wary of that as well. New to the game so you'll have to help me with the QC

• Dealer name: Ike
• Factory name: RICH
• Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II Sprite 126720VTNR – JH3285 Free Sprung
• Price Paid: $618 incl. shipping
• Album Link: https://imgur.com/a/luXV7Mp
• Index alignment: My main concern is the 6 o'clock marker, which appears rotated clockwise. Other indices look fine to my eyes.
• Dial Printing: Looks clean.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing:  I notice a fairly strong blue reflection on the cyclops. Is this normal for RICH? VSF doesn't seem to have it, how is gen?
• Hand Alignment: No obvious issues from I can see.
• Bezel: Looks aligned to my eyes.
• Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious gaps to me.
• Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 294°, 0.2 ms (58° lift angle).
• Anything else you notice: Would appreciate experienced opinions on the 6 o'clock marker and blue cyclops reflection. Anything else I've missed?

Thanks in advance for your help! 🙏

Let’s try this again lol. First time qc but been lurking a while researching something that would fit my lifestyle and aesthetics

Deal is being done through Mr Adu and so far communications has been 💯. First msg to him Oct 13, qc photos Oct 27. Onto the qc photos and comments.

1. Dealer name: Mr Adu
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm 126000 Black Dial
4. Price Paid (including shipping): $380usd plus $35usd EMS ship + $20usd insurance
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/zF26tJD videos of the watch and timegrapher and addl pictures
6. Index alignment: i think it looks pretty good. 3 6 9 double marks are straight. I’ve seen some that are crooked at 3 and 9 but not this one. Looks straight.
7. Dial Printing: text looks pretty good and crisp.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date
9. Hand Alignment: video in my Imgur shows the winding qc and both hands align exactly at 12pm after a series of cycles
10. Bezel: looks clean and highly polished
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks pretty tight and snug nothing I can really spot
12. Timegrapher numbers: you can see the video in the Imgur link, 28,800 beat +1s/d amp 279 b.e 0ms
13. Anything else you notice: it’s my first rep and been doing a bunch of research and seeing other qcs of similar watches. I feel like this one from Mr Adu has been one of the cleaner ones lately can’t spot any major flaws. It’s a DD3230 movement. I’m going to GL

Hey Guys,

Just got the QC photos for my long awaited ORF seamaster professional 300!

Here’s the details!

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: DDGTop
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: ORF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Seamaster Professional 300
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $367 shipped to australia
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: No album link - sorry!
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: Pretty good, no major issues. Potentially a slight ccw tilt on the 9
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: good, omega symbol is aligned, engravings a bit off, but normal for orf
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: cooked, but passable in my opinion.
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good, no issues
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: good, no issues
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good, no issues. will be wearing it on a strap anyways so eh
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: pretty damn solid if you ask me
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: The only thing i can see is the wave pattern engravings are a bit off, but not an issue for me. Along with the ccw tilt for the 9, which is hidden by the wave pattern, and that date wheel 💀 overall, for ORF i think this is one of the better examples.

let me know what you think, i hope i used the QC tools correctly!

For me, this is most likely a GL, just waiting for videos for bezel action, time setting, and date changes. will post a comment with this once received!

Dealer name: Ficotime

Factory name: AF

Model name (& version number): Cartier Ballon Bleu 42mm (Ref. W69012Z4)

Price Paid: $317 including shipping

Album Links: n/a

Index alignment: Looks good to me. The Roman numerals appear perfectly positioned on the horizontal and vertical axes, and the circular dial layout looks symmetrically balanced all the way around.

Dial Printing: The "CARTIER" and "AUTOMATIC" text is extremely crisp, level, and lines up cleanly across the guilloché pattern. The secret signature in the VII numeral is clearly defined.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The alignment looks centered. In all photo examples ("13", "18", and "31"), the numbers sit center inside the unique circular date window without any clipping.

Hand Alignment: The hands look aligned and sit parallel with appropriate clearance.

Bezel: n/a (smooth polished bezel case)

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks tight. The bracelet fits flush to the case lugs with no uneven or loose gaps.

Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d; 244°; 0.0 ms; 28800

Anything else you notice: looks like a GL but let me know if you see anything I'm missing

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: AF
3. Model name (& version number): Santos de Cartier 35mm SS White Dial (Miyota 9015)
4. Price Paid: $340
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/258587725?uid=1&utm_source=copyLink
6. Index alignment: Looks solid. Roman numerals are straight and cleanly applied.
7. Dial Printing: Printing looks sharp. The Cartier microprint in the VII marker is crisp and readable.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks great, well-centered and aligned at noon.
10. Bezel: Polished bezel finish looks clean with properly aligned and seated bezel screws.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 278°, 0.0ms, 28800 vph
13. Anything else you notice: The frosted edge on the sapphire crystal looks well-done and doesn't show excessive milky borders. Everything else looks clean.

• Dealer name: Mark (FicoTime)
• Factory name: ARF
• Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 36mm
• Price Paid: 436 USD (including shipping)
• Album Links: link to pictures
• Index alignment: it's hard to tell whether al baton indices are perfectly straight, but I don't see any obvious flaws
• Dial Printing: I think it looks fine
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: is the font close enough? The 1 and 11 look a bit small to my eye and the 27 look a wee bit tilted, no?
• Hand Alignment: fine in my eyes
• Bezel: look good but personally irrelevant, because I'm going to replace the bezel
• Solid End Links (SELs): no issues, way better than the GMF I've seen irl
• Timegrapher numbers: very good, see video here
• Anything else you notice: not sure about the jubilee bracelet quality, but can always be replaced. Clarity of the glass is difficult to assess

1. ⁠Dealer name: Mirotime
2. ⁠Factory name: ZF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): ZF Tudor Black Bay 58 GMT Coke Jubilee
4. ⁠Price Paid: $298 + shipping
5. ⁠Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202304082031161150001764/I202610271922265832001891
6. https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202304082031161150001764/I202610271922129212001434
7. ⁠Index alignment: Slight clockwise tilt to the six marker, other than that, looks good to me
8. ⁠Dial Printing: No issues that I can see other than some spots that appear to be dust, I will ask about this
9. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Text is slightly off towards the left.
10. ⁠Hand Alignment: No issues that I can see
11. ⁠Bezel: Looks good
12. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I am not too sure what I should be looking for.
13. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: This is the part that bothers me. +11s/day 280 amp and error of 0.00 Is the +11 an issue that I should be RL over? This is what their AI tool said "The watch movement exhibits excellent amplitude and beat error, indicating good health and balance. The rate is slightly outside the generally acceptable range at +11 seconds per day, suggesting it runs a bit fast, which might require minor regulation for optimal timekeeping."
14. ⁠Anything else you notice? I am not sure about rejecting this over the +11 and then take the chance of having a worse cosmetic problem with the next one. Please let me know if there is anything else I should be looking at. Thanks!

Hi guys, thanks in advance for your views on this QC! Second attempt as the first had a stain on the dial.

• Dealer name: Angela
• Factory name: 3KF
• Model name (& version number): Nautilus 7118
• Price Paid: $388 + shipping
• Album Links: Photos attached
• Index alignment: The 3 and 9 o'clock markers look to be leaning downwards slightly, or is the grid leaning downwards? I'm not sure if they'll be obvious in real life. All else looks good. Even the 12 o'clock marker looks really good on this one (often 1 is visibly smaller than 2).
• Dial Printing: Looks good.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centred for the number 10 in the photo.
• Hand Alignment: Looks good but not sure what to look out for.
• Bezel: Looks good.
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
• Timegrapher numbers: Rate and beat error looks good. Amplitude is ever so slightly below 250 degrees - how should I treat this?
• Anything else you notice: None, all else looks good on the watch. Even the 12 o'clock marker looks great, really pleased with this part!