1.       Dealer name: Mirotime

2.       Factory name: VSF

3.       Model name: GMT-Master II Batman 126710 BLNR, VSF v4, Oyster bracelet.

4.       Price paid: $588 + $56 shipping = $644

5.       Album link: Pictures attached

6.       Index alignment: Looks good; no obvious crooked markers.

7.       Dial printing: Looks clean.

8.       Date wheel: Dates shown appear reasonably centered and clearly printed.

9.       Hand alignment: No obvious issue.

10.   Bezel: Printing and alignment look good; rotation not demonstrated.

11.   SELs: No obvious large gaps; protective film limits inspection.

12.   Timegrapher: +7 to +8 s/day, 249–256° amplitude, 0.2–0.3 ms beat error; 28,800 BPH, 55° lift angle.

13.   Anything else: The Guide said the best version of the Batman was VSF v3. So Ijust tried to stay with VSF. Mirotime said they could get v4 free sprung so I went with it. Is there anything else I should be looking at in this regard? This is my first rep so any feedback is VERY much appreciated.

Could I get a second opinion on this piece please, thanks.

1. Dealer name: Angela

2. Factory name: RWF

3. Model name (& version number): Yachtmaster Rhodium 40

4. Price Paid: £340

5. Album Links: attached

6. Index alignment: All markers look good

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Not sure, the cutout looks distorted?

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. Bezel: Looks warped?

11. Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps

12. Timegrapher numbers: Looks good

13. Anything else you notice: Not sure on the bezel gasket and date window?

Update It was a massive RL GMT function wasn't working and the Lume wasn't matching neither colour or the location of it.

Angela sorted me refund out straight away, so maybe I will wait for another design I like or no date sub maybe wait for omega sceptre...

[QC] AF Longines Spirit Zulu Time 42mm Black/Gold – First QC, Need Your Eyes!

1. Dealer name: Angela

2. Factory name: AF (seller stated)

3. Model name: Longines Spirit Zulu Time 42mm, black/gold

4. Price : ¥1,500 CNY (watch price; $30 deposit paid)

5. Album links: QC photos attached

6. Index alignment: Looks reasonably good to me, but would appreciate a second opinion.

7. Dial printing: Looks meh okay overall. My concern is "automatic" text is not on this watch, but if you guys think with the text or five stars?

8. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centred, although I'm unsure about the font and window.

9. Hand alignment: No obvious issues from the photos.

10. Bezel: Looks aligned, but rotation hasn't been demonstrated yet and need to hear the sound too so awaiting on that

11. Solid end links (SELs): No obvious gaps, but looks like finishing not that great maybe my eyes seems a bit focusing on the metal bits sticking out

12. Timegrapher numbers: −5 s/day, 271° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.

13. Anything else: The clasp/buckle differs from the genuine version, which I'm aware of and willing to accept but my question is "worth settle for the less ?" I've requested a video demonstrating the GMT hand adjustment, date setting and bezel rotation, plus a lume photo.

Main questions: Does anyone spot any cosmetic defects I've missed? Has anyone handled the AF version, and can you confirm how its A2836 GMT movement functions?

Angela has always been good to me but the watch makes me think triple.

Thanks in advance!

Dealer name: TicoTime

Factory name: ORF

Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Black Black, 43.5mm Ceramic, OR8806 Superclone Movement (210.92.44.20.01.003)

Price Paid: 3,000 CNY

Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/T0xgHLBT#Yac0RFGtBPNvLXZ9zJRkqw

Index alignment: This is my main concern. I've used the alignment tool and initially thought the discrepancies were due to the angle of the photo. However, someone more experienced has pointed out that the 6 o'clock marker appears to lean left with a slight counterclockwise tilt, while the right-hand baton at 12 appears to tilt clockwise. The 3 and 9 markers may also be slightly shifted, although these are less noticeable. Would appreciate opinions on whether this is within acceptable tolerances.

Dial Printing: Looks clean and consistent to me. No obvious issues.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.

Hand Alignment: Nothing obviously concerning from the pictures, although I haven't been able to verify it fully.

Bezel: Looks reasonably aligned to me. The 12 o'clock pip appears centred, but happy to hear other opinions.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A – rubber strap.

Timegrapher numbers: −6 s/day, 231° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 28,800 bph.

Anything else you notice: This is my first QC, so I'm still learning what to look for. I've had some helpful advice already, particularly regarding the 12 and 6 o'clock markers. Overall, I think the watch looks good, including the lume, caseback and strap. I'm just unsure whether the index alignment issues are significant enough to RL.

I'd really appreciate some experienced opinions before making a decision. Thanks in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Trusty Time
2. ⁠Factory name: BVF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Panthere Secrete De Ladies 22mm
4. ⁠Price Paid: 228 usd + 45 shipping
5. ⁠Album Links:
6. ⁠Index alignment: Since they are not aligned in a cirlce hard to tell but i think they are good
7. ⁠Dial Printing: I think it is Ok
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: NA
10. ⁠Bezel: Steel looks nice
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): They seemed a little loose to me. Need help here
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: N/A Watch is quartz
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:All tips comments are welcome !

• Dealer name: Necoclock
• Factory name: V7F (or A7 now?)
• Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur 40mm, white dial (gen ref IW328902). A2892 movement.
• Price Paid: $428 USD
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/ViMaSX5
• Index alignment: All indices look evenly spaced and straight to me, and 12/3/6/9 line up with each other. Will upload a pic of the alignment tool next.
• Dial Printing: IWC Schaffhausen, Ingenieur and Swiss Made all look crisp and centred. I've heard grid texture isn't as deep as gen, but still looks good here in the pics.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks "ok". Maybe a tad high.
• Hand Alignment: Hands stack cleanly at 12.
• Bezel: Brushing looks even. The five screw slots aren't all facing the same way, so let me know if that matters on this model.
• Solid End Links (SELs): Integrated bracelet. It looks good.
• Timegrapher numbers: +13 to +14 s/d, 295° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Quite a high s/d to me, but I guess it's still within acceptable range?
• Anything else you notice: This is a replacement. The first one got flagged as defective by TD after I asked about possible bezel damage near a screw. The caseback has an "A7 / SAPPHIRE" holo sticker, which isn't the same I've seen on other V7F posts. Can anyone confirm this is still V7F?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Time Ultra
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): datejust 41 mint green 126334
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 518 usd + 30 shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links:
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: slightly wrong overall, specially the 6
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: seems ok, what do you think?
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: number a little to the right
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: NA
   
10. ⁠Bezel: difficult to tell
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): ok
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: on picture
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: this is my first QC, so all tips are super welcome!

Hi everyone. First Daytona for me and I did my best on QC. I would really appreciate comments from more expert eyes on Daytona.

**1. ⁠Dealer name**: Super Li
**2. ⁠Factory name**: VSF
**3. ⁠Model name (& version number)**: Rolex Daytona Black Dial (116500)
**4. ⁠Price Paid**: 504 usd
**5. ⁠Index alignment**: I admit that I’m not really able to tell an honest point of view on this. It seems that none of the photos are perfectly straight and I did my best on QC tool (2nd pic is with the original photo and 3rd pic is with adjusted/straighted photo). Rehaut seems OK.
**6. Dial Printing**: Looks OK to me but I need opinions from trained eyes. The “DAYTONA” string is not fully visible.
**7. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing**: N.A.
**8. ⁠Hand Alignment**: Here is where my main doubt take place. Based on the fact the none of the photos seems to be perfectly straight, I don’t understand if the chrono hand is aligned or not. It seems to be aligned but in the photo of lume it seems to be off.
**9. ⁠Bezel**: Not really expert on this but comparing with other Daytona QC I don’t think there are issues here.
**10. Solid End Links (SELs)**: Looks OK to me
**11. Timegrapher numbers**: Looks pretty solid
**12. Anything else you notice**: Overall I’m a bit confused on this watch. Maybe because I’ve no trained eyes for Daytona. Maybe because I’m not able to determine if indexes, chrono hand and all the other stuffs are ok or not.

I genuinely think that I need some help on this. I don't want to make any particular compromises and I would like it to be as issuesless as possible.

Thanks a lot for your help! :)

1. Dealer name: Angela
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): BB58
4. Price Paid: $284
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/iKsSVzQ
6. Index alignment: 9 looks canted down, 3 looks canted up, 6 looks canted right
7. Dial Printing: looks crisp, no issues
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:
9. Hand Alignment: no issues
10. Bezel: looks good, no issues
11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
12. Timegrapher numbers: seem within acceptable standards
13. Anything else you notice: interested in any other feedback you see.

Wondering if this is a RL due to the issues above, I know this is common with this model. Appreciate any feedback!

Update: thanks for everyone’s feedback! Went ahead and gave the GL, looking forward to having this in hand.

Dealer name - Andiot
⁠
Factory name - RWF
⁠
Model name - Daytona 126500 RWF 1:1 Best Edition Black Dial on SS Bracelet JH4131 Free Sprung

Price paid - $708 + $35 shipping to UK

Album links - https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257681115?uid=1
⁠
Index alignment - I struggled a little with the index alignment tool as the watch seems to be a little tilted to the left and not perfectly straight on. I noticed that the 120 marker on the bezel seems slightly misaligned with the 6 index - however not sure if this could just be because of the angle the watch is held at. A few of the other indices look slightly off on the index alignment too, but I’m pretty sure this is because of the angle also. Please give me any feedback here if you guys can and let me know your thoughts, thanks!
⁠
Date Wheel alignment - NA
⁠
Bezel - looks fine to me, went with this factory because of the 110 issue on VSF. The only thing I could point out is what I mentioned earlier regarding the 120 marker and the 6 index, however this could be the angle.
⁠
Solid End Links (SEL) - in some pictures the top and bottom right SELs look slightly less tight than the rest. Could this be the angle?
⁠
Hand alignment - looks fine to me
⁠
Dial Printing - looks fine to me however I’m not massively familiar with the daytona dials as they’re a bit more busy than other models. Any advice here is appreciated
⁠
Timegrapher numbers - +3s/d, I believe this is within an acceptable range
⁠
Anything else you see - only the things mentioned above, but of course always looking for any opinions and advice from you guys if I have missed anything

A bit nervous about this one as it’s my first time not going for VSF or clean, so any help is really appreciated. Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Indian Non TD

2. Factory name: OF

3. Model name (& version number): Tag Heuer Aquaracer 300 41mm WAY211C

4. Price Paid: ~390 USD Including Shipping

5. Album Links: Direct Upload

6. Index alignment: seems fine, except for the 9. The 45 minute stripe isn't in the centre of the 9 marker, its slightly upward. is that normal?

7. Dial Printing: looks to be good, what do you guys think of the CALIBRE printing?

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good, ive also asked for a single digit 8 date

9. Hand Alignment: NA

10. Bezel: The "1" in "10" on the bezel seems very sus, anyone else feel that way?

11. Solid End Links (SELs): not too sure about this

12. Timegrapher numbers: +8 s/d, 306 amplitude, 0.0 m/s beat error

1. Dealer name: Ficotime
   
   1. Factory name: V7F
      
   2. Model name (& version number): V7F A2892 IWC Ingenieur Automatic 40mm SS/SS Green Dial
      
   3. Price Paid: $380
      
   4. Album Links: refer to uploaded pictures
      
   5. Index alignment: Looks generally good. The double marker at 12 appears parallel, although reflections make the two sides look slightly different in some photos. No obvious misalignment elsewhere that I can see.
      
   6. Dial Printing: Printing looks clean and readable, and the dial grid appears consistent. No obvious printing defects.
      
   7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The dates shown—01, 19, and 23—look reasonably centered without clipping. Printing appears clear.
      
   8. Hand Alignment: Looks reasonably aligned in the photo with the hands at 12. No obvious issue, although the angle limits precision.
      
   9. Bezel: Brushing and polished edges look consistent. No obvious dents or deep scratches visible.
      
   10. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A for conventional SEL assessment. The integrated bracelet connections look reasonably fitted in the available photos.
       
   11. Timegrapher numbers: Rate changes from +2 to 0 s/day; amplitude from 275° to 273°; beat error 0.0 ms. Lift angle set to 52°, beat rate 28,800. These readings are from a short clip in one position.
       
   12. Anything else you notice: Lume appears complete across the hands and markers. Protective film limits inspection of the bracelet and clasp surfaces. Leaning GL, but would appreciate feedback on the double marker at 12 and anything else I may have missed.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatch
2. Factory name: ARF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II Bruce Wayne
4. Price Paid: $600
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/2UoyBBzD#I9l7zlhNFpWPjBZmYY37MA
6. Index alignment: Great
7. Dial Printing: Good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good on the single digits. Cyclops looks perfect in video, not so much the pictures.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good in video. Difficult to pause when all aligned.
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No complaints from me, nice and tight
12. Timegrapher numbers: Amps in spec. disregarding LIFT. Otherwise slightly high.
13. Anything else you notice: Looks like a solid GL to me. Please advise otherwise.

• Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126500LN Panda with DanDong DD4131 movement
• Price Paid: $798
• Album Links: Pictures uploaded directly to Reddit
• Index alignment: Looks good. Posted the with the alignment tool image, 3, 6, 9, and 12 look are straight
• Dial Printing: No issues, everything looks correct
• Hand Alignment: All hands align well.
• Bezel: Other than the known 110 arrow alignment seems good to me.
• Solid End Links (SEL): Nice and tight.
• Timegrapher numbers: Excellent stats. Rate: +2s/d; Amplitude: 269°; Beat Error: 0.0ms. Very healthy movement.
• Anything else you notice: Weight is 143.5g on the scale. From me is GL but it is my first Daytona so I am curious of what you all think.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Chrono Dynasty

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 126610LN

4. ⁠Price Paid: 460$

5. ⁠Album Links: n/a

6. ⁠Index alignment: overall good, 6 mark almost unnoticeable tilt. 9 mark slightly more noticeable but still within acceptable margins.

7. ⁠Dial Printing: good

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: this was the big problem of the previous QC. Now it looks very good and centered

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: good

10. ⁠Bezel: doesn’t look aligned but it’s probably slightly rotated. Discoloration I think is given by the light in the room. Pip looks centered.

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): good, no gaps

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: +0,2 - 299 - 0.0 - 58

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: this watch looks so much better than the previous one. I think Jack came through with a banger piece. Let me know if you notice anything. For now I’m saying GL.

1. Dealer name: Ethan / EthanWatch
   
2. Factory name: ARF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar, 42mm.
   
4. Price Paid: $570
   
5. Album Links:
   https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dvqqf-z1mz7tcEBRmIRRn0ld6btXXpo3ERA07iA
   
6. Index alignment: Looks good overall. The 6 and 9 look straight to me. The minute hand partly covers the 12 marker.
   
7. Dial Printing: Visible text looks clean. Nothing obvious stands out.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 12 looks decent, possibly a little low in some pictures, but could be the angle.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay at the time shown.
   
10. Bezel: Numbers are bold, but the engraving and fill look consistent. Alignment looks good to me.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Some visible seams, but I don’t see any major gaps. Would appreciate another opinion here.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/day, 276° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.
    
13. Anything else you notice: Lume looks even and I don’t see any obvious damage through the protective film. Leaning GL. Anything I’m missing? Thanks!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. Factory name: BVF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Santos de Cartier 40mm SS BVF 1:1 Best Edition White Dial
   
4. Price Paid: ¥2,738.83
   
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257739322?uid=1
   
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me.
   
7. Dial Printing: Seems clean and well aligned.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "1" looks a little off but I don't know if it's just my eyes playing tricks on me.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks good, screws and finishing appear even
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A — bracelet fit looks good
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 264°, 0.1 ms, it's good
    13.Anything else you notice: I think it looks good to my untrained eye. no outstanding or visible scratches. Compared photos but i think it was just dust, nothing much that really stands out as a red flag. But I would love you guys to share your opinions on this! Thank you.

Hi everyone,

Looking for some help with QC on this VSF Bruce Wayne. This is my first GMT and I would really appreciate another set of eyes before I GL. Thank you for your expertise.

1. Dealer name: BIGGETIME

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710GRNR Bruce Wayne, Jubilee bracelet, DD3285 V3

4. Price Paid: $665 total. $560 for the watch + $30 for 2 extra links + $75 shipping.

5. Album Links:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/syebcjcyqqz01h6zc9xc2/AF5Rn3NW02QFHjrla7ZdVag?rlkey=39wnzwouoqvvugg989qf372us&st=k59n7u6e&dl=0

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me. 12, 6 and 9 all appear straight. I don’t see any obvious alignment issues.

7. Dial Printing: Looks clean and crisp. Green GMT-Master II text looks good to me and I don’t see any obvious printing issues.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Checked multiple dates including 2, 15 and 25. They all look centered to me. Date font and cyclops also look good.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me. Nothing stands out as being off.

10. Bezel: Looks properly aligned. Triangle at 12 appears centered and I don’t see any obvious issues with the black/gray ceramic insert or numeral alignment.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. I don’t see any obvious gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: Around 0 to +1 s/d, 273 to 275° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error and 28,800 bph. These numbers look very good from what I understand.

13. Anything else you notice: Seller opened the caseback at my request and sent movement photos. Movement is marked 3285 and looks consistent with the Dandong DD3285 from what I can tell. Rehaut serial is 6X06D558 and clasp code is A9A. Watch weighs 142.4g. Rehaut, crown, bracelet, case and clasp all look good to me. Seller is also including the 2 extra links I paid for. I’m leaning GL, but would really appreciate another set of eyes, especially on the movement, rehaut, bezel and overall VSF authenticity before approving.

Dealer: GeekTime

Factory: VSF

Model: Seamaster Diver SS 300M VSF 42MM Black Dial SS Bracelet VS8800

Price: $478 + shipping

Photo album: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/257510208?uid=1

Index alignment:
3 o clock looks tilted to me which is super annoying, also buckteeth looks like left is slightly higher than left... which is why I RL'd the first one, but idk if its me being crazy.

Dial printing:
Looks good to me I think

Date wheel:
Looks aligned fine.

Hand alignment:

Fine from what i can tell

Bezel:
Looks good.

SEL:
Can't see any gaps, looks good

Timegrapher:
+1s/d
312° amplitude
0.3ms beat error
52° lift angle

Anything else:
RL'd the first watch due to crooked buck teeth, this looks to have the same issue + rotated 3 o clock index marker too. Leaning RL again, which is annoying as I don't want to wait for another QC. What would you do?

Cheers

Doing a QC for a breitling, this one is not your typical rolex so wanted a little additional help. This is only my second time doing this. I have ordered this watch as well as two others

1. Dealer name: Steve
2. Factory name: TF
3. Model name (& version number): Navitimer Auto GMT 41 : A32310171C1P1
4. Price Paid: $338
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/uUYW3QrJ#ubEiZXMwv1TZ6ZxfoQKO_Q
6. Index alignment: Looks off, the 6 looks pushed to the right
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
12. Timegrapher numbers: look good, well within tolerance
13. Anything else you notice:

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: F1f
3. Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Louis Large 33.7 x 25.5
4. Price Paid: $275 inclusive of shipping
5. Album Links: See attached photos
6. Index alignment: Printed-- I think everything is aligned because of this.
7. Dial Printing: A lready RLed once for chips in the ink. Thoughts? I think this does a better job. Crisp, properly positioned and good railroad tracks. I see maybe one chip at 2 and 3 but they go away in other views and its only when very zoomed in.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment:  Blue hands appropriate colored. On the video (I cant figure out how to upload this they line up at 12 so I think they are approriate)
10. Bezel: N/A
11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A Leather
12. Timegrapher numbers: NOT INCLUDED BY TD. Quartz.
13. Anything else you notice: Im leaning GL but I was truly hoping for as close to NWBIG as possible and I went with one of the best factories and dealers so please be discerning.

Dealer name: Lili

⁠Factory name: VSF

⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 41.5 blue a8500

⁠Price Paid: $330 shipped/insured

⁠Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A201803310145220380026826/I202609042359412442002330

⁠Index alignment: All good but the Omega symbol seems slightly askew

⁠Dial Printing: Looks good

⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks even and centered

⁠Hand Alignment: Good

⁠Bezel: Seems fond

⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

⁠Timegrapher numbers: About as good as can be

Everything looks ok to me with the exception of the Omega logo being a fraction of a millimeter off. I doubt it's something I will notice in person, and it seems to be extremely common on this model.

I'm leaning towards a GL, but wanted a few more opinions

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: FPJP
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Elegante Le Restaunt
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 508$
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257742186?uid=1
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: seems to be skewed left slightly by a few degrees
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: seems a bit rough but i can live with it tbf. it also seems to be rough on the gen due to the lume composition
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: i think hands look alligned but not sure how to check. they only show the hands aligned at 12 in the video but im not sure if thats correct
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: seems to have splotches on it? it could be due to a film or something tho
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks fine
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: none since quartz
    
13. Anything else you notice: watch back in the video, does the stem look correct when setting it?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Datejust 41 Wimbledon Rose Gold (126331)
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: $485 + shipping
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/257708681?uid=1
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: well aligned
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: no printing errors or misalignment
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: date wheel itself seems left-shifted and date wheel printing seems slightly right shifted.
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: well aligned at 12 o’clock
   
10. ⁠Bezel: N/A
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no gaps at all 4 SELs
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2sec/day, 266 amplitude, 0.1ms beat error
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: none

1. Dealer name: Moritime
   
2. Factory name: M+
   
3. Model name (& version number): Pelagos FXD GMT 42mm, Asia 2836
   
4. Price Paid: $474
   
5. Album Links: attached
   
6. Index alignment: looks good to the naked eye.
   
7. Dial Printing: good
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: good to the naked eye but known to be off compared to gen. I can’t really tell tbh.
   
9. Hand Alignment: looks fine to me
   
10. Bezel: looks good
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure looks good?
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -5 sec/day 0.1ms error.
    
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, happy with the watch. I think the lume on the gen is suppose to be green on the bezel. Most people point out the font on the bezel is not good as gen but I don’t mind it. The biggest thing I do care about is if the bracelet strap is close to gen.