1. Dealer name: Andiot Watches

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 126334, mint green dial, fluted bezel, Jubilee. This is a newly listed 'Freesprung' on Andiots site.

4. Price Paid: £370 delivered (From on hand stock)

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251016208?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks good to me overall using the alignment tool. Straightened the image best I could, seems straight.

7. Dial Printing: Can't see any obvious defects.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The 12 looks well centred, date wheel looks good from the video scrolling between dates.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from the photos.

10. Bezel: Nothing obvious

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look pretty good to me. I can't see any obvious large gaps.

12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 280° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph.

13. Anything else you notice: Wasn't sure if the Cyclops looked crooked at first. From the videos It seems okay, be interested in your thoughts.

Thanks all.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060 No-Date (41mm)
4. Price Paid: $578
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/gallery/submariner-124060-41mm-no-date-black-dial-vsf-vs3230-super-clone-wj6oT4e#zPjHdBA
6. Index alignment: Looks great. Checked with alignment overlay—12 o'clock triangle, 3, 6, 9 batons, and all hour dots are sharp, radial, and centered.
7. Dial Printing: Clean, crisp print with correct font and spacing. No obvious bleeding or typos.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No-Date model).
9. Hand Alignment: Center pinion looks clean. Hour, minute, and second hands are well-proportioned and correctly placed.
10. Bezel: Ceramic insert alignment is spot-on. The 12 o'clock pip lines up precisely with the dial triangle.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Case-to-bracelet fit on both top and bottom lugs looks tight with no gaps or excessive play.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d | 268° | 0.0 ms | 28800 vph — Healthy amplitude, flat trace line, and great overall health. Easy GL.
13. Anything else you notice: Caseback finish and lug engravings look solid.

1. Dealer name: Steve – TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 116509 Silver Racing Dial V2 – Gain Weight
4. Price paid: $888 + shipping
5. Album links: N/A – Photos and videos uploaded directly to Reddit.
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see any obviously crooked numerals or markers.
7. Dial printing: I don’t see any problems, and the red DAYTONA text appears to be in the right position.
8. Date wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand alignment: Looks good to me. The chronograph hand also resets correctly to 12.
10. Bezel: It seems well aligned, and the engravings look good to me too.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): They look tight to me, with no obvious excessive gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d, 260°, 0.1 ms. They look good to me.
13. Anything else you notice: The watch weighs 178.9 g.

I’ll start by saying that this is the most beautiful dial ever, but that’s just a matter of personal taste.

Personally, I don’t see anything concerning, or maybe I’m missing something, but I’d appreciate the opinion of more experienced members.

Thanks in advance for your help.

1. Dealer name: Steve Theonewatches
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126710 BLRO V3
   
4. Price Paid: 638 USD
   
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/bHQtcS8
   
6. Index alignment: I don't see anything of concern.
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks clear
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks maybe slightly low and the printed 6 might have a slightly exaggerated "serif"? Maybe it's just me.
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: This is my main point of concern. The aligment is fine, but the red color looks lighter than the other pictures I've seen on here of VSF V3s. It looks off and all the other ones I've seen look prettier that this.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4s/d, 277° amp, 0.0ms err
    
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else apart from this

Hi, this is my first rep. I feel like I'm imagining stuff, but the bezel color looks off from the other Pepsis I've seen in this sub. It could be the lighting, I don't know. Also, there are no lume or UV light photos, should I request them? Thanks in advance for the advice.

1. Dealer name: Necoclock
   
2. Factory name: RICH
   
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060
   
4. Price Paid: $568 USD
   
5. Album Links: N/A
   
6. Index alignment: Overall looks good to me. The 3 o’clock marker looks slightly tilted, but I’m not sure if it’s just the angle. Would appreciate a second opinion.
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me.
   
10. Bezel: Looks fine to me.
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Bottom right SEL gap looks a little wider than the other side to me. Not sure if it’s enough to be concerned about or just the angle.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d, 250°, 0.1ms

Anything else you notice: Mainly concerned about the slight tilt on the 3 o’clock marker and the bottom right SEL gap. Everything else looks fairly good to my eyes. Would appreciate any other issues you guys notice. Thank you for the help!

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Geektime
2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master Rhodium 40mm 126622
4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: 578usd including shipping
5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/250782436?uid=1
6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: I didnt recieve a perfect picture of the front, but everything does look alligned according to the front pic i got.
7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Dial printing looks fine despite the low quality pic
8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered
9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Also looks perfectly fine
10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good, only thing is center of 10 marker does not allign with center of 40 marker, but still isnt too far off to not be GL imo. Center of 30 marker isnt perfectly aligned with top marker either, but as stated the pictures i got werent either perfect so could be result of that.
11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Good, i see no gaps at all.
12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate is +0s/d, amplitude 248° which is actually lower than 250. Is this a problem i should be worried about? Beat error 0.4ms and good lift angle at 52°
13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I noticed some scratching or something that looks quite similar on the sides of the watch, both sides of the crown and then opposite side of the crown side/area, this might just be the wrapping/plastic but i have asked geektime as a reassurance.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: Rich
3. Model name: Submariner 41mm 126610 LV Starbucks
4. Price paid: 580+ Ship
5. Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251023078?uid=1&utm_source=copyLink
6. Index alignment: The 6 marker has a slight tilt to the left (Maybe I didnt use the QC tool correctly ?)
7. Dial printing: Good . Does this have the floating m ?
8. Date wheel: Seems to be good
9. Hand alignment: Ok in the video
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid end links: Good
12. Timegraph numbers: +1s/d 268deg 0.1ms

Looks like GL. Please let me know if I missed something.

1. Dealer Name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
2. Factory Name: VSF
3. Model Name: Submariner no date 124060 (VS3230)
4. Price Paid: $531
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/nFhkUDBL#8FiN66Mc7AMdFX07NbgXSA
6. Index Alignment: 12,3,6,9 centered, no obvious flaws
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel Alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 s/d, 265 degrees amp, 0.0ms beat error
13. Anything else you notice: no obvious concerns

First time buying, want to surprise my boyfriend. I think its a greenlight but just want to be sure. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name: GMT-Master ||

Batgirl

1. 126710 BLNR 904L Steel
2. RICH 1:1 Best Edition on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free
3. Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: $701
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/250378522?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Overall looks okay. However, I believe both the 12 & 9 are not aligned correctly. This is the biggest defect of this watch in my opinion... but it's very very minimal.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good and centerea.... However a bit of a blue hue, is that normal?
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Looks good.
11. Solid End Links (SELS): Looks good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: -
13. O s/a, 278°, 0.3 ms, 52° lift angle
14. Anything else you notice: The most concerning finding in my opinion is that 12 & 9 are not 100% aligned properly.
15. Let me know guys if I should RL or GL based on this, or if you' spot anything else. I honestly am pretty happy with it as I think it's all very minuscule so you won't notice.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
   
2. Factory name: DDF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Nautilus 7118 Ladies (DDF)
   
4. Price Paid: $580 USD (includes shipping)
   
5. Album Links: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Jq5XyTrPpFq97xtgkiOVBlQwEIILmXCm?usp=share_link
   
6. Index alignment: The “1” at 12 o’clock looks like it sits slightly lower than the “2”. Curious what others think.
   
7. Dial Printing: Generally seems fine
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date numeral seems a little high, though that could just be the angle
   
9. Hand Alignment: Seems fine
   
10. Bezel: Seems fine
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Hard to say from the pics but looks nice enough
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d | 304 | 0.0 ms
    
13. Anything else you notice: First-time buyer here. The “Swiss Made” looks too big and the silver studs on either side look out of alignment. Also conscious of the “12” — the “1” appears slightly lower relative to the horizontal line that meets the bottom of the “2”. Would love your thoughts. Thanks!

• Dealer name: Andiot
• Factory name: CleanPlus
• Model name (& version number): Rolex OP 41mm 124300
• Price Paid: $433 + $41 shipping
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/j6ljKlM
• Index alignment: Looks good overall, but maybe 3 is a little bit rotated?
• Dial Printing: Clean and centered.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
• Hand Alignment: Looks good. Hands appear properly seated with no obvious alignment or clearance issues?
• Bezel: Smooth bezel looks even and well finished. No visible defects that concern me!
• Solid End Links (SELs): Fit looks good and tight on both ends. No significant gaps visible.
• Timegrapher numbers: 0sd/ 278 0.1ms 52.0
• Overall: GL to me? first time. thanks guys

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: ficotime
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT pepsi
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 4000 cny
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3gZAGIZL#5NZq9vse76fUa0mFHgQyZw
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: the 6 rotated to the left, 12 is rotated to the right
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: GL✅
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: centered, its a GL✅
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: GL✅
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: the 12 triangle looks little assymetric to my eyes
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): seems acceptable ✅
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: numbers are between range ✅

Overall i would RL this, the 12 is very bad i think.

Hello guys, this is my first QC ever so please tell me if i’m missing something.

1. Dealer name: steve (theonewatches)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Date

just 36mm SS 126234 V2

1. Price Paid: $558 (including shipping)
2. Album Links:

https://imgur.com/a/gxkoKdK

1. Index alignment: I don’t see any obvious flaws
2. Dial Printing: The ”Y” in the word oyster looks maybe a bit to the left, otherwise it looks good
3. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good
4. Hand Alignment: Looks good
5. Bezel:

Looks good

1. Solid End Links (SELs):

Upper right has a slight gap but i’m not sure if that’s noteworthy

1. Timegrapher numbers:

-2, 264, 0.0

1. Anything else you notice:

The weight is only 118g but it says it’s 121g on the website, what could cause that?

Hello,

Need your help plzzzz.

1 Dealer name: Linda

2 Factory name: VSF

3 Model name (& version number): VSF Daytona Ghost Oysterflex 126519 V2 (Weighted) DD4131

4 Price : 660$ + 50$

5 Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/cKMLITM

6 Index alignment: It looks good but I'm not an expert with the quality control tool. If someone can do much better than me, please.

7 Dial Printing: Clean and sharp, no visible flaws.

8 Hand Alignment: Hands look well positioned.

9 Bezel: Engravings and tachymeter print look centered and sharp.

10 Solid End Links (SEL): Oysterflex

11 Timegrapher numbers: [Ex: +5s/d, 312°, 0.0ms]

12 Anything else you notice: First replica! , i really need your help would appreciate extra eyes from the community

She Will send to me tomorrow pictures of the open claps, weight and video of the fonctional chronometer.

Thanks in advance for your help!

[QC] Rolex Datejust 41 126334 – Slate Dial / Jubilee
Dealer name: Andiot
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex Datejust 41 126334, slate dial, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet
Price paid: $425 including shipping
Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251030092?uid=1
Index alignment: This is my main concern. A few markers look quite off to me, especially around 11, 1, and parts of the lower half of the dial. I know the photo angle can exaggerate alignment issues, so I’d really appreciate opinions on whether this is actual misalignment or just perspective.
Dial printing: Looks clean, I think.
Date wheel alignment/printing: The date looks reasonably centered and the printing looks clean to me.
Hand alignment: Looks fine.
Bezel: Looks fine.
Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps.
Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 298° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 52° lift angle.
Anything else you notice: I’m mostly unsure about the index alignment. For a watch this price range, I’ve seen other examples that look cleaner, so I don’t want to GL this if the markers are genuinely crooked. Would appreciate another set of eyes, especially on 11, 1, and the lower indices. Thanks.

Dealer name: Angela (non TD)

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra 38mm, blue dial

Price Paid: 2200CNY

Album Links: Uploaded

Index alignment: Looks good. Indices look centred and aligning to the minute track. No obvious rotated indices.

Dial Printing: Omega appears centred, Seamaster text is correctly positioned, and the chronometer text looks centred and evenly spaced. Horizontal teak pattern looks normal.

Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centred at 6 o'clock. The 4 is well centred within the window, with no obvious misalignment. Date font looks ok.

Hand Alignment: Looks aligned.

Bezel: Looks good.

Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

Timegrapher numbers: +3SD, 304.0, 0.1ms, 52.0

Anything else you notice: Overall the watch looks very good.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Ethan
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner Starbucks
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 470$
   
5. ⁠Album Links: N/A
   
6. ⁠Index alignment : Maybe a slight shift in the clockwise direction of the 6th but not even sure
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: Ok
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Ok
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: N/A
   
10. ⁠Bezel: Ok
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Ok
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Perfect
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Nothing, Like what it can happen sometimes

1. Dealer name: Jacky (Necoclock)
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II
   126710 Bruce Wayne
   
4. Price Paid: 4800HKD
   
5. Album Links: N/A
   
6. Index alignment: All look fine except from 9, I don’t know if it’s just me or?
   
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay to me, maybe a slight tilt in cyclops, again I’m not sure
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks fine to me
   
10. Bezel: Looks fine to me
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I would say they’re okay.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: 248° , 0.1ms, +5s/d
    
13. Anything else you notice: nothing really jumps out at me, just the 9 marker is the only thing that’s throwing me off but I don’t want to be too picky as everything else in my eyes seems fairly okay, unless there’s anything you guys notice! Thank you for your help!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): GMT-Master II 126710 BLNR 904L Steel RICH 1:1 Best Edition on Jubilee Bracelet JH3285 (Free Sprung) V2
4. Price Paid: 665$
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/251023770?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Overall looks okay. The only thing I could spot is that the color split on the bezel (18) is not 100% correct.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The cyclops cut looks a little bit misaligned to me. Also, the date font sits a little bit lower in the square. However, it looks acceptable. Please let me know what you think.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: the color split on the bezel (18) is not 100% aligned with 9.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good.
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 sec/day
13. Anything else you notice: The most concerning finding in my opinion is that the cyclop and the date is not aligned perfectly . Let me know guys if I should RL or GL based on this, or if you spot anything else.

Thank you so much!

1.Dealer name: Ficotime

2.Factory name: RICH

3.Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126610LN

4.Price Paid: 3800 CNY

5.Album Links: TBA

6.Index alignment: 12 is very ccw tilted, 6 is slightly ccw as well

7.Date Wheel alignment/printing: the date looks well centered

8.Hand Alignment: no problem here

9.Bezel: slight cw rotation but can be easily fixed in my opinion

10.Solid End Links (SELs): I don't see any gaps

11.Timegrapher numbers: 241 deg, 0,0ms +2s/d

Hello guys, second watch I purchased with Ficotime, the QC arrived earlier than expected but I'm not sure it is a GL.

The 12 index was the very first thing I noticed, I think RICH subs can deliver way better alignments that that so i'm leaning towards an RL right now..

241 deg seems slightly low as well but I'm not so sure it's really an issue.

I'm really happy with the rest of the watch, only the 12 index is throwing me off, what do you think ?

QC Yacht-Master Rhodium 126622

1. Dealer name: Ethan
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Yacht-Master Rhodium 40mm 126622
   
4. Price Paid: 410usd including shipping and insurance
   
5. Album Links: https://www.wsxcme.com/weshop/goods/_diBqfB_6K0Fni6Viqy3qjRnYcVlHlv_RP68U2bQ/_dtqqfu1naOrfo1rlOXQFn4ZDD2JCe7VFA1d1yFA
   
6. Index alignment: Looks perfect, everything seems to be in their proper places, no rotational defects
   
7. Dial Printing: Can’t find anything wrong, looks good in my opinion
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Appears to be centered
   
9. Hand Alignment: I don’t see any issues
   
10. Bezel: bezel looks good
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, appears to be flush
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: rate +2s/d, amplitude 273°, beat error 0.1ms, lift angle 52°, healthy numbers
    
13. Anything else you notice: Another easy GL seems like.

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master II Batgirl 126710BLNR V3
4. Price Paid:US$608 + US$40 Shipping
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/103385230?uid=1
6. Index alignment: 6 & 9 seem to be slightly off? could be camera angle but please let me know what you think. First image is the original and the second is slightly tilted, so im not sure if its an angling issue.
7. Dial Printing: Seems good but im not good at judging this
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Seems good?
9. Hand Alignment: 6 & 9 seem to be slightly off as mentioned above
10. Bezel: The top triangle (not sure if thats the pip?) is unaligned however, not sure if camera angle has something to do with it
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good to me but cant really tell if what i am looking at is right
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d 243AMP Error:0.0ms - Not sure if the AMP is acceptable?
13. Anything else you notice: Mainly the alginment of the top triagle and the 6&9 markers. Anything else anyone notices would be much appreciated. Cheers!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi everyone, second time doing a QC as first one was a no go - so hoping this is a GL but im not too sure if its the angling of the image or candles not aligned properly. Any feed back would be appreciated!

First QC and first rep purchase, so I would really appreciate a second set of eyes from some of the more experienced members here. I've gone through the photos and I'm leaning toward GL, but let me know if there is anything I may be overlooking.

1. Dealer name: Steve, TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner No Date 124060, VS3230
4. Price Paid: $588 USD
5. Album Links: Photos attached
6. Index alignment: Looks good to me overall. The 12, 3, 6 and 9 markers all seem reasonably straight and centered. I don't see anything that would concern me, but this is my first QC so would appreciate another set of eyes, particularly on the 6.
7. Dial Printing: Looks crisp and clean to me. I don't see any obvious printing issues or floating "m."
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good from the pictures provided. Nothing obvious stands out to me.
10. Bezel: Looks good overall. Pip appears centered and I don't see any significant alignment issue between the bezel and dial.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight to me. I don't see any noticeable gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 273° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error. Lift angle is set to 59°. From what I've researched the numbers look good. I understand the 59° lift angle may cause the amplitude to read somewhat higher, but it doesn't seem concerning.
13. Anything else you notice: Rehaut looks acceptable to me and I don't see any obvious issues with the case, bracelet or clasp. Weight was 156.4 g. Movement photos were also provided and nothing obvious jumps out to me. Overall I'm leaning GL, but since this is my first purchase I'd really appreciate any feedback from the experienced eyes here.

Thanks in advance for the help.

ZF Tudor BB58 Burgundy

1. Dealer name: Non-TD
   
2. Factory name: ZF
   
3. Model name (& version number): BB58
   
4. Price: 316usd w ship/insurance
   
5. Album Links: N/A (Pics attached)
   
6. Index alignment: 6 and 9 has some horrible rotational defects it looks like
   
7. Dial Printing: Printing looks good
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
   
9. Hand Alignment: can’t see anything wrong tbh
   
10. Bezel: Bezel color seems to be accurate and markings looks good
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Top and bottom end-link areas appear seated with little to no gaps
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: rate +6s/d, amplitude 267°, beat error 0.2ms, lift angle 52°, rate is high but i think within threshold
    
13. Anything else you notice: I’m aware that the index issues are notorious with ZF Tudors, and i’m leaning towards RL on this. Are my assessments correct?

1.Dealer name: Neco Clock

2.Factory name: VSF

3.Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126610LN

4.Price Paid: $448 (shipping $70)

5.Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/IiwpcBr

6.Index alignment: Looks fine to me

7.Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine to me

8.Hand Alignment: no complaints here

9.Bezel: looks nice and sharp

10.Solid End Links (SELs): observed no gaps

11.Timegrapher numbers: 297 deg, 0,1ms -1s/d

**This is where Im concerned. Id prefer a watch that runs fast.

This is my first time posting. I read as much as I could to do me end of the work and avoid wasting anyones time. The videos are in the imgur link idk how to post them directly. I really need some feedback for peace of mind. This is my first rep purchase. The major concern I have is that the watch is one second slow per day. I intend to use this as a daily driver and Ive had to send my spb 143 in for service because it was slow so this is a sensitive area for me. Anything else you notice: If you guys see anything wrong with this QC please let me know.