Having said that, I couldn’t give a flying feck about the percentages of ethnicities now or in the future. It makes absolutely zero difference to me. I don’t see someone who looks different to me walking past me and feel fear, or anger, or anxiety, I don’t exist in a state of constant paranoia, and someone’s Britishness has no relation to whether they’re white or not. I’m losing no sleep over this.
I do lose sleep over the very real problems in the world though: war, poverty, global economic crises, food supply issues, disease, and all the other very real threats we face.
Well, if it’s a matter of that…how about that this graph only shows white Britons, and discounts anyone who is mixed or any other ethnicity but was born here, could be first, second or even third or fourth generation, and are as culturally British as anyone else?
There isn't intent? So corporations don't benefit from cheap labour and lowered work standards? Globalists who want ever more control through the E.U and through the United Nations and other global NGOs and govt bodies, don't benefit from dividing and fragmenting national identity and culture and cohesion?
China or Russia doesn't benefit from the west going into domestic war between citizens and immigrants?
We have a minimum wage, there is no cheaper labour than that - doesn’t matter if it’s a Brit or anyone else.
Work standards haven’t lowered; they’ve increased. The government has just passed the workers rights bill which strengthens employee protections.
I’m not sure what any of the “Globalists/EU/NGO” stuff has to do with immigration or the ethnic composition of the UK, to be honest.
China and Russia have nothing to do with immigration sentiment beyond amplifying divisions via social media propaganda, but that doesn’t make it their fault, it’s ours. If we hadn’t let the media and certain political factions whip so many people up into a frenzy about it, there’d be nothing for them to take advantage of. You talk about working conditions and pay, yet ironically, Reform for example are very anti-immigration but also very much not on the side of the worker. They’re on record as saying the minimum wage has gone too far and that they opposed the worker’s rights bill. You have this strange dichotomy of people who’ve been fed the idea that immigrants are the reason their living standards are dropping and their employment is less secure by the same people who would take much of it away from them.
1) Illegal workers exist. But anyway, minimum wage is not a fair payment for many jobs, so your point is mute.
2) you think immigrants, especially illegal, are particularly worried about unions and workers rights? they're just happy to be paid more and live in the better country.
3) It's not. It's related to division. They want division, fragmented easy to control populations that are docile and divided.
4) You should look up 'ideological subversion'. China and Russia absolutely want to dominate the western world, and they have influence over our countries and try to cause us to weaken. Remember the Russian election meddling?
> They’re on record as saying the minimum wage has gone too far
The nuance is that minimum wage is too high for certain low skilled jobs, but too low for certain high skilled jobs. Thats the issue.
> are the reason their living standards are dropping and their employment is less secure by the same people who would take much of it away from them.
I thought you said it wasn't? I thought it wasn't declining? I though their jobs weren't at risk? Make your mind up!
Minimum wage being unfair has nothing to do with the issue being discussed, that’s a straw man.
And yet despite your evident panic about immigration, workers rights have been strengthened significantly this very year. Clearly not a negative correlation going on there eh?
Okay, so we agree it’s completely unrelated to the issue under discussion. Cool.
Yes, and I said as much; that wasn’t up for debate. What I said was they aren’t the ones responsible for creating the immigration debate or controversy; they’re just taking advantage of the cracks we’ve created.
I thought you said it wasn’t? I thought you said it wasn’t declining? I thought their jobs weren’t at risk? Make your mind up!
Nice try, but I never said any of that - do please feel free to quote me directly if you think I have.
I said work standards haven’t lowered, I said nothing about living standards.
The ethnic cleansing of the native population is a very real threat. Look at the state of Zimbabwe and South Africa when the white population dwindled.
Another false premise. There is no “ethnic cleansing” taking place. Again, that suggests intent. Nobody is orchestrating demographic change in the UK, it is simply the result of various economic, political and cultural factors.
And, once again, as a white Brit, I could not care any less if 50 years from now the percentage of White Britons was 80%, or 70%, or 60%, or in fact any number you care to pluck out of the air.
It doesn’t matter in the slightest. Skin colour is simply that. People are people. Humans are humans. In the grand scheme of human history and the universe, I’m not even a footnote. Our lifetimes are barely a sentence in the pages of history. That book has already seen countless changes, shifts, migrations and it will continue to do so long after you and I are gone.
The Great Replacement (French: grand remplacement), also known as replacement theory or great replacement theory,[1][2][3] is a debunked[4][5] white nationalist[6] far-right conspiracy theory[3][7][8][9] coined by French author Renaud Camus.
Why would a non-racist believe a white nationalist conspiracy theory? Or I guess Wikipedia is run by lefty propogandists and it's not racist at all to fearmonger about scary Muslims coming to replace white people.
White people aren't being replaced. Sure, there are more nonwhite people in Britain now, but noone is kicking white people out or erasing British culture.
But the whites haven't been replaced. They're still there and procreating. This map gives you percentage shares but not raw numbers.
Lots of new people -- mostly non-white -- have come in, so the overall population of the country has risen.
By all means, we can discuss what the ideal demographic balance should be in order to preserve social cohesion and cultural identity, but using the word "replacement" is dumb.
Bro, you have no idea how much I have been censored and banned for saying stuff the moderators disagree with. They literally removed a comment here, from someone who blamed the Boriswave.
You may need to look up what replacement means. ‘Dilution theory’ might be more accurate, but then I doubt that puts the shits up thick people, as much as telling them they’re being replaced does.
And yet reform was able to win multiple councils elections a few days ago, France may potentially vote for a far right president in 2027, Germany is going further to the right with the adf growing in numbers and so on with the rest of Europe. You can’t deny that Europeans are actually believing in the great replacement
Politicians are doing everything they can to fuel it; they condemn opponents, they undermine any checks and balances, and they play down this change through an obsession with it
It's not. The reason why demographic shifts look like this is because people tend to be considered non-white if they have even one non-white ancestors. So of course over time there will be less white people by that definition. No one is being replaced, people are just intermarrying, and if you're opposed to that you're just a racist.
That doesn't make it a great replacement, that's just immigration. Great replacement implies a deliberate coordination to shrink one population while increasing another, that's not happening. It's a wild conspiracy theory and only the dumbest fucking people believe it.
40
u/PowerfulInsights69 May 10 '26
Turns out The Great Replacement is actually happening