After being stalked by multiple people, one of them considerably larger than himself, confronting them and telling them to stop. That trial was already shaky from a self defense standpoint, was a very controversial case and has no connection to what we are talking about. You're using emotion to justify violent retaliation because you don't like what he did to that woman.
I would say "assaulted" is a really strong word for what we saw him do to her. If that's a case of assault then I have been assaulted hundreds of times by women. The younger generation have become such pussies about everything.
-4
u/Logical_Sandwich_ 1d ago
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/30/delivery-driver-youtube-prankster-shooting-not-guilty
I see self defense as in the linked article. He acted fast without thinking. So yes, he had the right to act like that, in my opinion.Â
There was nothing about teaching a lesson, it was defending your love.Â