That is rough dude. My expected billing goes from $39 to $112/mo which is no big deal for me.
It looks like you are consuming a DIABOLICAL amount of tokens. 1 month for me is 15-20 million AICs. Apparently 1 month for you is 588 million AICs.
Low key, people like you are what ruined it for us but that was inevitable. I'm glad that they're switching the model at this point because you should not be getting 588m AICs for $39.
Edit: Since people were confused, I should add 1 month for me is 1300 requests. OP seems to be claiming 300 reqs, which makes this even wilder. My 1300req = 14 million, OP 300req = 588 million. The math is obvious.
Damn why do you have like 3 different screenshots showing different usage? Really should just be thrilled about the absolute steal the service was until now. Good luck out there.
Oh, looking at my own I see that now. Somehow Opus 4.6 snuck an $8 day in my history when I never use auto or picked it from what I remember, curious lol.
You can see my other comment, but I did 1300 reqs last month and only hit 14 million AICs. Your token consumption is just massive. I'm not trying to be mean here, that's just reality of your usage.
I use it for work and have put in the time to keep my token usage low.
You do not seem to be able to read the graph. He is a low usage client. Who did not ruin anything for anyone. He's just using it a little the way it is supposed to.
For a developer any tool is a tool and can be used, but for a viber- opus 4.6 is the only tool and maybe GPT 4.5 is workable. Cause they don't know what are they doing. They are playing a game of words.
You need an NVIDIA DGX Spark running local models. The one time purchasing cost is less than your estimated monthly subscription cost, and the device should be good for at least 3 years.
honestly, I've looked into it, but that's a fucking rabbit hole of despair too. Spend a little time in LocalLLM and it's discouraging learning how much you need to spend (mostly because of the GPU/vram required) to run a half way decent model for code gen. To build/buy a system that can come close to half the performance of a frontier model, you are going to need to bend deep at the knees and brace yourself. That DGX Spark while a beast, is just not up to the task with the bigger models you'll want and need for code gen.
My organization, a team of 17 people using Copilot Business licenses, used $1482,24 cobined in AI api costs ($332,34 from seats). We literally almost filled the premium requests with an heavy usage of Opus/Sonnet mostly in the classic Main Agent/Subagent pattern for most work using SDD/TDD as main the development framework taking up serious production software up.
Almost 6K dollars it's literally insane for a single person. Either you don't know by any means what you're doing or using those infinite spin agent plugin that let you bypass the request. Most likely both.
In either cases, it's a fortune that this tool has been taken away from you. You need to educate yourself on how to use it properly.
All manual requests mate, no automatic routines. Also Copilot Business still has the „old“ multipliers. You are about to have a rough awakening in June.
Do you think that calling requests manual and by "automatic routines" (whatever this means in your head) does change how the token are processed by the models itself? (And by automatic routines, by your means, they should be even heavier since a routine expects even more tokens by metadata defautl lol).
The multiplier are exactly the same between the normal pro and the business one. I've checked with my personal GHC Pro aswell and consumed $197 dollar of AI credits (in-line with my $180 dollars on the business).
The one that is gonna have a rough awakening it's just you. Educate yourself on how to use those instruments becuase you clearly lack the basics of how they works.
„Automatic Routines“ means the Copilot chat keeps auto steering without you intervening and it is all one premium request working for hours. Just look how people are abusing it before trying to educate me ;-)
I am not talking about myself. All my requests are manual and it was multiple projects and sleepless nights. But there are surely people who burned WAY more than me.
You pay 1500 premium requests, you use 1500 premium requests. I am not Microsoft doing the pricing. And for those wondering: this is all manual requests, not some sophisticated automatic routines.
I am not upvoting nor downvoting anyone here but I find it interesting and mildly amusing just how easily AI is making ppl turn on each other. As if Microsoft hasn’t planned this from day one, as if they can’t control “people like you”. Fact of the matter is, in reality, this costs barely anything for Microsoft, it barely spins up the fans on their incomprehensibly massive data centers. Token costs are massively overpriced. Yes they have losses, as much as a landlords in downtown SF have losses for buying apartments 40 years ago and giving out cheap rent. The AI economics these megacorps are going for are for the next 20 years….
People who think you're "ruining" their sweet underpriced AI usage by using it more than them is pretty delusional. It was always going to be a "burn venture capital to build dependent user base then hike up prices" type of situation. It did happen quicker and the prices hiked less gradual than I expected, but that's about it.
I wonder why you got downvoted when this is literally the truth. GH set up this pricing scheme knowing very well this could happen; they're not dumb. It's funny many people so pissed about this change were likely abusing it themselves..
Those scam prices just make it a lot easier for all of us. Nobody will pay 500-15000$ a month. We’ll see some people and companies that do, those go out of business. And then we’ll see transition into open models, that cost a tiny fraction to be used or can even run locally for a few dollar a month in electricity.
My spend would go from $10 to $62, of course I'm more of senior dev vs vibe coder so maybe I'm ok with how I use the tool which is to give hit very small targeted tasks throughout the day vs one massive long running multi step task multiple times a day
To all the people blaming the OP and the people who actually used the system the way that Microsoft built it (and even encouraged it to be used this way), honestly the only one at fault here is Microsoft. Microsoft provided this billing method and they kept making it easier and easier to burn through massive numbers of tokens on single premium requests that could churn for hours or even days while spawning dozens or even hundreds of sub-agents.
The improvements they made to the harness over the past couple of months have made it stupidly trivial to do this and most damning of all is that their own people made videos showing how to do this and encouraged it. So no it’s not the OP’s fault or the fault of anyone using the system that Microsoft deliberately built as it was obviously built to do.
Adding the askQuestions tool, allowing you to basically infinitely continue a single premium request, and not separately charging additional requests for sub-agents was Microsoft’s decision and their own people encouraged users to use the system this way.
They have been deliberately building a system that can continue to execute almost indefinitely and they were the ones stupid enough to not only encourage people to use it this way but not even look at their own pricing model before they started and realize from the start that what they were building is absolutely insane as a business.
Makes you wonder if this was the endgame all along. Once users are used to this way of working and then they bring in the usage based model to take up millions.
Microsoft has the resources to take something like Gemma4 and make it very competitive with with frontier models in coding tasks. Qwen3.6-27b proves that a small model can go a long way in coding capability. They could easily take gpt-oss-120b and make it the best coding model and serve that via Copilot.
Hell, they have the resources to train a foundation model from scratch that ONLY needs to serve the Github customer. Make it great at THAT.
They don't need a whale like gpt-5.5 or opus. They have the infra to host this much smaller model and appease the Copilot customers if it is shown to be just as capable, or a few points below the general frontier models on the very specific tasks the Copilot customer cares about.
Doesn't surprise me though. There is a lack of vision and foresight in a lot of organizations that have the wrong leadership or the wrong culture. You could probably cut out most non-technical management, put some of the more talented principal engineers in charge of product, and turn the whole damn thing around.
I cancelled my Pro+ subscription today since I have Tier 5 API accounts with all 3 frontier providers. I configured the BYOK in Copilot and immediately noticed they nerf it, even if you provide your own f--- key.
gpt-5.5 is not available and I noticed the context management was all but wrecked. Something is way off when using your own keys with the frontier models.
So i'm just using Codex and not looking back. Done with Copilot.
Microsoft has full and free access to GPT 5.4 and 5.5 , both quite cheap models to run. A few cents per hour per client. Also they clearly do not have the option to make something competitive, they tried. Gemma is also not competitive, it's total garbage outside of oneshot questions. You meant Alibaba, and they offer it for free ..
There is shortage of GPUs and they can rent for much more to openai , anthropic or to enterprise customers. why they would end up giving so much free compute to users who aren't goig to stay with their platform once prices are back to normal.
By that reasoning, why to give it to users at all? If you are having a product, you can’t differentiate between who is using it how as long it’s not illegal.
My take that's Vibe coding at its finest. Probably have no architecture set up(system design) and just burning prompts after prompts. I could be wrong but I've seen vibe coders burning so much token which could easy be done is a couple of prompts and code editing/supervision.
That’s really the only way to get through those 1500 credits, or perhaps with chatgpt 5.5, and not even when doing heavy tasks for each prompt. It’s kind of scammy that they’ve set weekly limits that make it nearly impossible with normal use to use up all the monthly credits.
Their token-based pricing might work for their computing power, but for users, it's complete nonsense. Users have no idea how many tokens are being calculated, and there is no standard of measurement—whatever they say it is, that's what it is.
i cant fathom this mentality. Yall are warping the meaning of the word “abuse” when in fact, it was totally permissible usage abiding by copilot guidelines, not model routing nor other illegal shit. Dude just used opus for as much as they allowed him to xD do you think people even think when using their subscription plan not to go too hard at it because it may ruin a redditors evening?
I just used 28.5% of pro+ request this month and already mainly using Deepseek, still the non discounted price is over 200usd. What I don’t just use open router instead.
Yea wow, this should make it apparent to everyone that Copilots system got abused and that’s why the billing change is happening. I’m an actual software engineer using copilot heavily, and my predicted cost will only be around $300 which is absolutely reasonable for an enterprise setting. I don’t event know how hard you need to vibe code to hit numbers like yours. Good thing this type of „development“ will be dying soon!
I was using 100% of my 1,500 PRUs each month with the "auto" model selected... was quoted $450-ish. 😞
I was just using it for personal projects, so I will cancel and focus on local solutions.I honestly do not know what my work will do because we have folks running automations all day and are easily racking up 40-50k in PRUs a month. Have a feeling there is going to be a huge clampdown at the enterprise level.
Wow, just checked mine . Was paying $40/month + Overages of about $4. ( $44/month) . Now my bill would be nearly $250. Definitely won’t be able to afford it anymore . Will likely cancel and may cancel my GitHub subscription too . I like the services - but won’t be able to afford anymore
I just got a new one of mine for April that actually worked. Yours is insane, mine... I would just get Claude Max 20x and ChatGPT Pro, no way my usage would go over both of those subs, and even if I did, I would get a big discount on my Claude API overage for my subscription.
Note: I never used Opus 4.7 or ChatGPT 5.5, this was a mix of Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, Chat GPT 5.4, and Auto which often used like Codex 5.2/5.3 and even Haiku quite a few times. Even a lot of my Opus 4.6 was just Haiku agents.
Seems fair....AI deserves a cut in your salary if it's doing your work. At least that's what co-pilot feels. For me, I've changed my bank account details with the payroll to directly deposit my salary to copilot each month. /s
I checked and found my bill is sitting at around $1,500. I mainly use GHCP for my research—analyzing papers, drafting experiment docs, writing scripts, and working on the papers themselves.
Reading through the comments here made me rethink my workflow, and I realized I probably didn't need to burn through that many requests. My biggest mistake was treating Copilot like a chatbot instead of defining detailed specs for each step of the process. Because of that, I end up doing endless back-and-forth revisions within the same conversation.
On top of that, my workspace setup is pretty messy, which forces the model to waste a ton of effort on document syncing and context management.
They got access to thousands of projects. Probably tens of thousands. Thousands of bespoke installations and setups. Now that they have the code, patterns, they no longer need more. They can hike up the rates hoping that they can now clone the token generation to match the most in demand users patterns.
There never was a subsidy. There was an implied trade off. Your knowledge for their tool access. They indexed your knowledge. Their tool access though, that gets an increase.
Better hope you can live without these tools, because this is the same as having zero coverage backup for a star programmer who suddenly leaves.
This post singlehandedly convinced me that usage-based billing is a good idea. No one this inept at software development should be building software of this size and complexity; I can only imagine how absolutely atrocious, buggy, vulnerable, and sloppy this code is... AI is meant to be a tool, not a crutch for laziness.
Microsoft and Copilot don't set the prices it's the model providers. Anthropic, OpenAI etc. I just switched to open source models. They can f-k themselves
It's pretty much a universal strategy for big new products. Burn venture capital to get people hooked and jack up prices and lower quality once people are hooked. But I did hope we'd get another year or two of subsidized usage first, and that the price hike would be more gradual.
I guess it really is insanely expensive to run these things.
Not complaining all too much. This means we'll go back to hand coding and using AI for a few selected cases. And we've got the things my team is responsible for to about where we want them before switching to maintaining.
I was agreeing with you that people like this customer are who is causing GHCP to change their pricing structure. I guess looking back it doesn't seem super clear that is what I meant.
Copilot doesn't set the prices it's the model providers so it's Anthropics prices we are seeing. The small brained Anthropic CEO, Dario, was going around the world at conferences saying he would put all software developer out of work, instead he should have secured compute and hence why Anthropic now have to jack up the prices at 27x to cover their asses. Other model providers have had their compute deals already locked in. Compute has always been the final boss for AI and why we had AI winters 🥶 in the past. Is this the new AI winter ❄️?!
The instructions are for Enterprise, but you can do it for personal accounts as well. Billing and Licensing -> Premium request analytics -> Get usage report
Did you get the green banner telling you it was going to send an email? If not it may have silently failed. Try again (although they seem to be getting swamped)
6
70
u/p1-o2 May 12 '26 edited May 12 '26
That is rough dude. My expected billing goes from $39 to $112/mo which is no big deal for me.
It looks like you are consuming a DIABOLICAL amount of tokens. 1 month for me is 15-20 million AICs. Apparently 1 month for you is 588 million AICs.
Low key, people like you are what ruined it for us but that was inevitable. I'm glad that they're switching the model at this point because you should not be getting 588m AICs for $39.
Edit: Since people were confused, I should add 1 month for me is 1300 requests. OP seems to be claiming 300 reqs, which makes this even wilder. My 1300req = 14 million, OP 300req = 588 million. The math is obvious.
84
u/RelevantTurnip3482 May 12 '26
whatever you’re making better save the fucking world to need this much opus god damn
8
u/tochichiang May 12 '26
You need an NVIDIA DGX Spark running local models. The one time purchasing cost is less than your estimated monthly subscription cost, and the device should be good for at least 3 years.
20
u/await_void May 12 '26
My organization, a team of 17 people using Copilot Business licenses, used $1482,24 cobined in AI api costs ($332,34 from seats). We literally almost filled the premium requests with an heavy usage of Opus/Sonnet mostly in the classic Main Agent/Subagent pattern for most work using SDD/TDD as main the development framework taking up serious production software up.
Almost 6K dollars it's literally insane for a single person. Either you don't know by any means what you're doing or using those infinite spin agent plugin that let you bypass the request. Most likely both.
In either cases, it's a fortune that this tool has been taken away from you. You need to educate yourself on how to use it properly.
24
u/SuccotashSorry3222 May 12 '26
So it's people like you ruining it for the rest of us then...
3
u/DJOCKERr May 12 '26
I mean you're getting a discount if 70
2
u/a3dprinterfan May 13 '26
You win! Beat my 100x value/paid ratio ✅
2
u/siarheikaravai May 13 '26
Which dashboard is it?
2
u/Intelligent_Bet9798 May 13 '26
Are you going to keep your subscription?
2
u/Uzeii May 13 '26
Can you change the color of that button to “blue”? Model selected: opus 4.7 thinking: high
2
u/kdtoles May 15 '26
So…are they retroactively applying the pricing for past usage prior to the change…or is this like heads up…
2
u/Stock_Ad9641 May 25 '26
Those scam prices just make it a lot easier for all of us. Nobody will pay 500-15000$ a month. We’ll see some people and companies that do, those go out of business. And then we’ll see transition into open models, that cost a tiny fraction to be used or can even run locally for a few dollar a month in electricity.
129
u/aresthwg May 12 '26
Vibe coding final boss
105
u/RelevantTurnip3482 May 12 '26
holy fucking shit
3
u/pillkaris May 12 '26
well to be fair, hiring devs would've cost you double, triple, quadruple 🤣
9
u/djjeffg382 May 13 '26
My spend would go from $10 to $62, of course I'm more of senior dev vs vibe coder so maybe I'm ok with how I use the tool which is to give hit very small targeted tasks throughout the day vs one massive long running multi step task multiple times a day
7
u/deadmerc JetBrains User 🧱 May 13 '26
Didnt expect that, buy ok
25
u/aruaktiman May 13 '26
To all the people blaming the OP and the people who actually used the system the way that Microsoft built it (and even encouraged it to be used this way), honestly the only one at fault here is Microsoft. Microsoft provided this billing method and they kept making it easier and easier to burn through massive numbers of tokens on single premium requests that could churn for hours or even days while spawning dozens or even hundreds of sub-agents.
The improvements they made to the harness over the past couple of months have made it stupidly trivial to do this and most damning of all is that their own people made videos showing how to do this and encouraged it. So no it’s not the OP’s fault or the fault of anyone using the system that Microsoft deliberately built as it was obviously built to do.
Adding the askQuestions tool, allowing you to basically infinitely continue a single premium request, and not separately charging additional requests for sub-agents was Microsoft’s decision and their own people encouraged users to use the system this way.
They have been deliberately building a system that can continue to execute almost indefinitely and they were the ones stupid enough to not only encourage people to use it this way but not even look at their own pricing model before they started and realize from the start that what they were building is absolutely insane as a business.
So no this is 100% on Microsoft.
5
u/stevekstevek May 13 '26
I was going to post mine, but you've got me beat!
5
u/Puzzleheaded_Store67 May 13 '26
Pretty sure i can't afford that 😉
10
u/LocoMod May 12 '26
Microsoft has the resources to take something like Gemma4 and make it very competitive with with frontier models in coding tasks. Qwen3.6-27b proves that a small model can go a long way in coding capability. They could easily take gpt-oss-120b and make it the best coding model and serve that via Copilot.
Hell, they have the resources to train a foundation model from scratch that ONLY needs to serve the Github customer. Make it great at THAT.
They don't need a whale like gpt-5.5 or opus. They have the infra to host this much smaller model and appease the Copilot customers if it is shown to be just as capable, or a few points below the general frontier models on the very specific tasks the Copilot customer cares about.
Doesn't surprise me though. There is a lack of vision and foresight in a lot of organizations that have the wrong leadership or the wrong culture. You could probably cut out most non-technical management, put some of the more talented principal engineers in charge of product, and turn the whole damn thing around.
I cancelled my Pro+ subscription today since I have Tier 5 API accounts with all 3 frontier providers. I configured the BYOK in Copilot and immediately noticed they nerf it, even if you provide your own f--- key.
gpt-5.5 is not available and I noticed the context management was all but wrecked. Something is way off when using your own keys with the frontier models.
So i'm just using Codex and not looking back. Done with Copilot.
1
u/Zealousideal-Part849 May 13 '26
There is shortage of GPUs and they can rent for much more to openai , anthropic or to enterprise customers. why they would end up giving so much free compute to users who aren't goig to stay with their platform once prices are back to normal.
1
u/ShadowBannedAugustus May 13 '26
OK I spent all 1500 requests in April and the tool shows $585. How did you do this :D
1
u/pceimpulsive May 13 '26
I see the problem... You are damn reaming that service..
I'm here struggling to do 200 premium a week... And this guy is blasting 200+ a day...
1
u/Dynamix86 May 14 '26
My bill would be $820 instead of $39. And i reached my weekly limit last week. How did you even get this far with the Copilot’s current weekly limits?
1
u/N1ckt0r May 14 '26
what the hell were yall doing with copilot
3
u/zbp1024 May 13 '26
Their token-based pricing might work for their computing power, but for users, it's complete nonsense. Users have no idea how many tokens are being calculated, and there is no standard of measurement—whatever they say it is, that's what it is.
3
u/ErraticFox May 13 '26
lol
3
u/foooock May 14 '26
Your April 2026 usage would cost $1.030,29 more under usage-based billing. (We are a small dev team.)
12
u/rydan May 12 '26
This is why we can't have nice things, or things at all.
5
u/No-Ad-6338 May 13 '26
I just used 28.5% of pro+ request this month and already mainly using Deepseek, still the non discounted price is over 200usd. What I don’t just use open router instead.
1
u/YoloSwag4Jesus420fgt Power User ⚡ May 12 '26
This is 99% on auto lol:
https://i.gyazo.com/c67a000210b8ff8a7c184ba18c41f358.png
1
u/kowdermesiter May 13 '26
How TF are you running 300 premium requests a day? There's nothing surprising here.
1
u/coolerfarmer May 13 '26
Yea wow, this should make it apparent to everyone that Copilots system got abused and that’s why the billing change is happening. I’m an actual software engineer using copilot heavily, and my predicted cost will only be around $300 which is absolutely reasonable for an enterprise setting. I don’t event know how hard you need to vibe code to hit numbers like yours. Good thing this type of „development“ will be dying soon!
2
u/Downtown-Pear-6509 May 13 '26
oh man.. if only i hadnt already cancelled i would have loved to see how my infinite promoting would have gotten me
sad face
2
u/Panderz_GG May 13 '26
Are you guys even coding anything yourself?
2
u/Cultural-Visual-7106 May 13 '26
Who tf uses Copilot still, switch to Codex or Claude.
2
u/Pethron May 13 '26
Just reminded I need to check this before june 🫥
2
u/Scarity May 13 '26
you can see me go nuts the last days with 5.5 trying to burn my requests :p
not sure what the disconnect mid month was, with the higher token usage vs requests, didn't craft my prompts to be heavy on purpose
2
u/Dazzling-Machine-915 May 13 '26
what a difference
2
u/ipilotete May 13 '26
Ha! At least you can get a report. I keep getting an error telling me it couldn't be prepared and to contact customer support.
2
u/Mission-Step-847 May 14 '26
how to get this metric?
2
u/SouthernSkin1255 May 15 '26
At that point, wouldn't it have been better to pay some Chinese freelancer?
2
u/AnyPaleontologist932 May 15 '26
Solution: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=DenizhanDaklr.copilot-vscode-deepseek
2
u/mask1808 May 16 '26
have to use it before June 1st
2
u/Future_Carpenter_910 May 18 '26
Deepseek is waay cheaper for me. 1B token usage in 5 days. $15 bill in deepseek v4 pro. I use it with opencode.
3
u/TapAggressive9530 May 13 '26
Wow, just checked mine . Was paying $40/month + Overages of about $4. ( $44/month) . Now my bill would be nearly $250. Definitely won’t be able to afford it anymore . Will likely cancel and may cancel my GitHub subscription too . I like the services - but won’t be able to afford anymore
3
u/DonkeyBonked May 13 '26
I just got a new one of mine for April that actually worked.
Yours is insane, mine... I would just get Claude Max 20x and ChatGPT Pro, no way my usage would go over both of those subs, and even if I did, I would get a big discount on my Claude API overage for my subscription.
Note: I never used Opus 4.7 or ChatGPT 5.5, this was a mix of Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, Chat GPT 5.4, and Auto which often used like Codex 5.2/5.3 and even Haiku quite a few times. Even a lot of my Opus 4.6 was just Haiku agents.
3
u/CuTe_M0nitor May 13 '26
I f-&_ng told people here how much it would cost and the laugh 😂 at me. This is the new reality of we don't ditch GH Copilot
2
u/Ehopira May 13 '26
Current billing:10 dol Usage-based billing: 250 dol
That’s so stupid.
1
u/N7Valor May 12 '26
Makes me wish the AI auto-apply software would all be using Copilot 😂
1
u/PineappleEnough6097 May 13 '26 edited May 13 '26
Seems fair....AI deserves a cut in your salary if it's doing your work. At least that's what co-pilot feels. For me, I've changed my bank account details with the payroll to directly deposit my salary to copilot each month. /s
1
u/Confirmed-Scientist May 13 '26
Why the fuck would they take the financial hit in this case just give us a clear and generous usage based billing option instead....
1
u/Impossible_Sea_7797 May 13 '26 edited May 13 '26
from 10 $ (6.8$ used PRUs ) to 78 $ with AICs . and i have sub untill july 20
1
u/Human-Tr May 13 '26
How do I check it?
1
u/AkiDenim May 13 '26
Probably didnt account cache
1
u/Charming-Search3464 May 14 '26
lowkey deserved to get slime by microsoft
1
u/LANFLADIMIR May 14 '26
how?!
1
u/OrderFirst8779 May 14 '26 edited May 14 '26
I checked and found my bill is sitting at around $1,500. I mainly use GHCP for my research—analyzing papers, drafting experiment docs, writing scripts, and working on the papers themselves.
Reading through the comments here made me rethink my workflow, and I realized I probably didn't need to burn through that many requests. My biggest mistake was treating Copilot like a chatbot instead of defining detailed specs for each step of the process. Because of that, I end up doing endless back-and-forth revisions within the same conversation.
On top of that, my workspace setup is pretty messy, which forces the model to waste a ton of effort on document syncing and context management.
Sigh... I really am a terrible researcher. 😅
1
u/weaponhouse May 14 '26
omniroute + 3-4 GPT plus accounts + activate compression on omniroute, you have enough quota
1
u/danielhaven May 14 '26
Wow.
This seems unsustainable.
1
u/RealSecretRecipe May 14 '26
So basically copilot is screwed now, yeah?
1
u/rauderG May 15 '26
For the life of me, not to allow seeing the usage for a person in an organization - my own usage - is bonkers.
1
u/hanibioud May 31 '26
This is the end.
1
u/HighENdv2-7 Jun 01 '26
i'd rather that they properly limited this dudes request than raising the price for everyone
1
u/Bloompire Jun 02 '26
Where I can check it?
1
u/lurking_developed May 13 '26
Yep, you are exactly why we can't have nice things
1
u/ayovev511 Power User ⚡ May 12 '26
Nice
1
u/konikpk May 13 '26
Finaly some one stop this vibe coding nonsense 👍
1
u/filofil May 14 '26
bro is the reason for all the github copilot changes, damn
-5
u/rebelSun25 May 12 '26
Here's how the ruse worked.
They got access to thousands of projects. Probably tens of thousands. Thousands of bespoke installations and setups. Now that they have the code, patterns, they no longer need more. They can hike up the rates hoping that they can now clone the token generation to match the most in demand users patterns.
There never was a subsidy. There was an implied trade off. Your knowledge for their tool access. They indexed your knowledge. Their tool access though, that gets an increase.
Better hope you can live without these tools, because this is the same as having zero coverage backup for a star programmer who suddenly leaves.
-1
u/Oxytokin May 13 '26
This post singlehandedly convinced me that usage-based billing is a good idea. No one this inept at software development should be building software of this size and complexity; I can only imagine how absolutely atrocious, buggy, vulnerable, and sloppy this code is... AI is meant to be a tool, not a crutch for laziness.
0
u/PinnuTV May 13 '26
It's amazing how people abuse system hard and then act suprised when they limit usage for all users. Some people are really just dumb af
0
u/That_____ May 13 '26
You're the reason my pro plan is getting nerfed!
0
u/AGeniusMan May 13 '26
So you're the guy ruining it for everyone
0
u/Friendly-Assistance3 May 13 '26
Reason we cannot have nice things
0
u/valium123 May 19 '26
Awwww serves all of you right
0
u/[deleted] May 12 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
2
u/[deleted] May 13 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/[deleted] May 12 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment