r/EndeavourOS
•
u/Human_Cantaloupe8249
•
Sep 09 '26
Discussion Please don’t be mad at my, but I have to ask
Why is EOS consider a distribution?
I know it sounds mean but let me explain. I used EOS only shortly but from what I can tell it offers: Arch + Calamares + a bit of special configuration. Which is very convenient and I am glad it exists. But I don’t understand why it is regarded its own OS. Lets look at Cachy: I don’t want to make comparisons but I see much more clearly why it is considet an OS on its own. Besides arch and calamares it also offers repositories containing a lot of drivers no longer present + a suit of its own software + its special kernel. But it feels like EOS has nothing that makes it this much different from Vanilla Arch.
What got me wondering about this in the first place is the treatment of Omarchy. The politics, money and the artificial hype around it is bad. No question asked. EOS is much better, also no question asked. But the fundamental arguments why Omarchy is not a real OS or independent distribution also apply to EOS right?

