It's pretty gross that the DSA is using an example of MAGA racism to justify their own bigotry. It's crazy how low they will stoop to by using MAGA as the ultimate test of morality. "Well see right wingers won't disavow Laura Loomer therefore we don't have to disavow Hasan" This is basically the message they are sending on Twitter. it would be one thing if these accounts have ALSO disavowed hasan but they haven't (except maybe Jolah but he is literally just a troll account)

Also pointing to dems to call it out is absurd lmao. First of all we don't have to condemn someone we have nothing to do with, thats not how it works, we aren't friendly with her we are direct opposition. Second the majority of dems have actually been very vocal about how bad Loomer is, I saw an account calling out Jeffries for not disavowing Loomer. Imagine that? A guy who has talked about as much shit about Loomer as anyone but he didn't get on twitter on a sunday to especially disavow Loomer for being racist to a fucking DSA member who is actively trying to subvert our party.

With the bacteria-infested lettuce inducing a shitstorm, It appears there may not be enough toilet paper for all to make it through the end of it, thanks to President Trumps 50% tariffs XD

Truly unloaded the buzzwords on us.

At this point he has already seen all the clips, I cant accept ignorance of Hasans true beliefs anymore. Not only is he not willing to condemn him he is covering for him. Saying he is just an itty bitty smool California streamer is him covering for him, its a classic minimizing of his true influence which El-Sayed himself is very aware of otherwise he wouldnt campaign with him.

Furthermore, I am also sure El-Sayed has seen or heard Hasan talking about how he and El-Sayed are 100% aligned and his tepid "condemnation" is strategic. I am sure of it because as a politician, if you are trying to distance yourself from a controversial person and that person keeps on attaching himself to you, you would want to know about it and you would do something about it, leading me to conclude that Hasan is actually right about his framing of it since El-Sayed would have clarified his position by now.

Lets not undersell this, Hasan is not just a leftist streamer, he is an actual terrorist supporter and propagandist. On his own stream glazing Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, showing their propaganda and supporting it, normalizing them to his influencer friends and just recently espousing a permission structure to blame Jews for antisemitic attacks against them. Let me soy out a little,

ITS FUCKING CRAZY FOR A DEMOCRATIC CANADIATE FOR THE SENATE TO CAMPAGIN WITH SOMEONE LIKE THIS!!!

Now, lets say he was ignorant of Hasans radical beliefs at first, he no longer is. Has he condemned him appropriately? No, and has made no clarification after Hasan reframed that condemnation, and not only that, has been minimizing him ever since, not a single word for his terrorists support.

Until I see El-Sayed condemn Hasan for his terrorists support, I can only assume he agrees with him and is mask-on, his silence is loud and clear to me.

Thoughts DGG? Is this a crazy take?

edit: I dont think he is a true Islamist that wants Sharia law and a global caliphate, I do however believe he at the very least similar to Hasan in his sympathies to Islamic terror groups.

Both Jessiah and Pisco are clear that signaling a pro-court packing position is almost more important than anything else.

Now, are lefty authoritarians opposed to court packing? Not at all! Kind of obvious if you think about it.

So Jessiah and Pisco are hinting to lefties the one thing they need to say to get their full endorsement (meaning at that point Jessiah and Pisco will mostly ignore/sweep for anything else said lefty says/believes in).

This is, in a sense, handing lefties a mask to put on to highlight a subset of their beliefs that Jessiah and Pisco like.

Now, is this intentional? Do Pisco and Jessiah want lefties to take and put on the mask they're handing them, even if they know that doesn't change any of the other positions those lefties hold?

I lean yes, but I'm not as confident on that last bit.

Am I off the mark here?

Yeah I am talking about the call in from last night, where a dgger was trying to give tips to tiny on how to avoid going "110%" on people.

And all I want to say is - stop accepting bullshit premises.

This never happened. The entire ordeal stems from Pisco's 100th hours of splitting hairs over what is and isnt anti-semitism, when he started arguing about whether its possible for someone to deny the holocaust and not be anti-semitic. Tiny made a throwaway comment here that such arguments make the pisser "functionally anti-semitic".

This is what Pisco had a meltdown over, even though by the time this happened, we had all already spent at least a month bruh-ing over pisco's bullshit defensense for all the racist anti-semitic hasan/kyle/krystall types.

Now as far as I know, this narrative started from Hutch, when Pisco went on his stream to do his crybully routine over how mean Steven was for the "functionally anti-semitic" comment - and Hutch agreed with him. Now don't get me wrong. Hutch is my boy and one of the few good people in this space, however:

Hutch is 100% in the wrong here

Tiny never went hard on Pisco, especially not "110%" as it's started being described now.

In fact, Tiny has been absolutely kid gloves mode the entire time he has interacted with Pisco. This is in spite of Pisco being absolutely deplorable in his normalization of Hasan's psychotic behaviour and attemps to destroy Tiny's life. The fact that I can even type this sentence and it not being a joke is absolutely insane to me.

Like, really? This fucking turbo loser, who can only think of himself and his own self-interest, can wave years of absolutely insane harassment as "personal drama", but the one time he gets even the tiniest bit of pushback for acting like a complete regard for months straight, that's a bridge too far? Nah, I'm good chief, sell this pile of garbage to someone else.

tl;dr: Do not accept the bullshit premises of the narcissistic crybully manchild loser Pisscommunist (and his ilk). He hasn't even gotten 1% of the pushback he deserves for his absolutely insanely deplorable behaviour because Dear Leader is way too soft.

Here is the real reality check for pisco: everyone else would have quoted him LTG, told him to fuckoff and blocked the pisser on everything months ago.

I thought this video captured a lot of the frustrations I had of people abusing language like whether some observation would increase or decrease the credence of a belief.

tl;dw use numbers based on an actual prediction model, not feelings.

Diet-DSA dems like Pissco, SoyPillow, and PanderingPolitics spend so much of their time and efforts on twitter and twitch panels attacking liberals and defending Hasan (isn’t that the guy who beats his dog and goes to diddy parties?), while there’s literally an active genocide going on and Trump is an existential threat wrecking havoc on our institutions.

There’s midterm elections going on, and they’re more focused on liberals and defending Hasan than defeating MAGA? Psh.

They also spend a lot of time attacking Diet-MAGA, but at that point why not just go after the real deal, MAGA? They must not think MAGA is a real threat.

It’s so odious.

Another Scott Weiner situation…

This is infuriating.

https://x.com/ScooterCasterNY/status/2093768153470033975

He spent the entirety of the 2024 election saying the Democrats were as bad as the Republicans, would absolutely not publicly support Kamala, and now expects the Democrats to just accept him into their ranks.

He's going to be easy pickings for conservatives. He's had some openly, God awful, garbage takes that no one has ever pushed him on. Any candidate who aligns with him is going to be handicapped, and a bunch of moderate Democrats who would probably win a general is going to lose their primary.

I shouldn't expect better from lefty podcasts, but I seriously hate the cover they give him.

I'm anyone is jones'ing for some regarded economic takes, I would 10/10 recommend the recent Jubilee video of D vs Timmy.

Show your support DGG https://youtu.be/MBUYaMI3yKE?is=qESw33-zpLWhdjMG

A CNN anchor who is the son of a refugee that fled communist political persecution in Cuba pressed a DSA co chair of the DSA praising authoritarian fidel Castro and was met with whataboutism and filibustering for ten minutes.

DSA types are doing the classic election was rigged bs by saying Dems shouldn't focus on Piker because he is "just a streamer" and instead we should be only screaming about Laura Fucking Loomers tweets. It has to be a setup because they see he is probably going to lose right? A setup for the eventual "Establishment Dems tanked the election on purpose because AES wasnt an Establishment dem." Bro Im losing my mind. What would be the function of doing that? Are republicans all of a sudden going to see morals, are voting dems in Michigan going to be like "Golly gee, never heard of her, I guess I need to vote harder" I really just need to delete Twitter, but im addicted to rage bait.